For Beginners & Senior Students: Art & Culture by Civilsdaily

A comprehensive coverage of NCERTs, NIOS & CCRT Material. Click here & spend next 30 minutes to 10X your confidence

Lodha Committee Report: Restoring the glory of the game

To put an end to excesses and imbalances, corruption and red tape, all of which have harmed the game, the Lodha committee has examined reforms in the working of the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) to make its functioning transparent.


 

What is the Lodha committee?

The Lodha committee was formed in January, 2015 by the Supreme Court after the Mudgal committee report on IPL.

In its earlier report in July 2015, the Lodha committee delivered its judgement by banning Meiyappan and Kundra for life and suspending the owners of Chennai Super Kings and Rajasthan Royals for 2 years.

Let’s analyse the report under various dimensions

The Lodha Committee has suggested sweeping reforms in the structuring and governance of cricket in the country.


 

Structural Reforms: A major overhaul

  • The committee recommended that a 9-member apex council replace the 14-member BCCI working committee.
  • Each of these office-bearers has a three-year term and can contest for a maximum three terms.
  • The Lodha Committee also calls for dividing the governance into two parts: cricketing and non-cricketing.

The non-cricketing management will be handled by 6 professional managers headed by a CEO, and the cricket matters like selection, coaching and performance evaluation should be left to the players

Organisation & Office-bearers: Restrictions imposed

  • Each of these office-bearers has a 3-year term and can contest for a maximum three terms.
  • There will be a mandatory cooling off period after each term. Therefore, no office-bearer can hold office consecutively in a row.
  • No BCCI office-bearer can be Minister or government servant.

State Cricket Associations: One Vote/State

The Committee recommended that one association should represent an entire state and only one vote per state.

Indian Premier League: Maintain distance

  • It recommends separate governing bodies for the IPL and BCCI.
  • There should be a 15-day gap between IPL season and national calender.

Betting: Legalize it

  • It made a strong recommendation to lawmakers to legalise betting in cricket for all except cricket players, officials and administrators.
  • The players and others banned officials should disclose their assets to BCCI in a measure to ensure that they do not bet.

Betting is a $ 400 billion phenomenon practised across the globe and lawmakers in India should enact laws to legalise it.

Fixing: Criminalize it

The committee said that match-and spot-fixing should be made a criminal offence.

Conflict of Interest & Corruption

  • One individual hold only one post in cricket administration. The office-bearers would have to choose between positions in respective state associations and the parent body.
  • A former High Court judge should be appointed as ethics officer by the BCCI to administer issues relating to conflict of interest, misdemeanour and corruption.
  • A former Supreme Court judge should be appointed ombudsman to resolve internal disputes.

Transparency: Bringing RTI to BCCI

It recommended that the Legislature must seriously consider bringing BCCI within the purview of the RTI Act

Securing player’s interest

  • It recommended the setting up of a Players’ Association to safeguard the interests of the cricketers.
  • The report said players that are the driving force of the game, but they had been reduced to the status of employees and subordinates of those governing the game.
  • The idea is to give players voice, use their expertise and skills for the development and betterment of the game

Women Cricket: Often ignored by BCCI

The Women’s Cricket Committee to be formed to exclusively pay attention to this much ignored department, along with Women’s Selection Committee.

The proposed measures could radically alter the way the BCCI functions as well as vastly improve its public image and impart much-needed credibility.


 

Published with inputs from Pushpendra 

Any doubts?


  1. Profile photo of mayank Yadav mayank Yadav

    Does the post of president in bcci is office of profit?

  2. Profile photo of sanchita bramhankar sanchita bramhankar

    Great!!!

  3. Profile photo of Siddhartha Singh Siddhartha Singh

    Thanks

  4. Profile photo of Root Root

    Justice Lodha’s recommendations have made BCCI uncomfortable! They are meeting again to revisit the clauses. Good time for you guys to revisit the Newscards and CD explains.

  5. Profile photo of Udayan Subuddhi Udayan Subuddhi

    Great!

BCCI reforms: Centre moves SC against Lodha committee recommendations

  1. What? The Govt has moved the Supreme Court against implementation of the Lodha committee recommendations on administrative reforms in the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI)
  2. Why? The govt maintains that it was not heard when the court decided to implement some recommendations which go against its interests
  3. Attorny General Rohatgi appeared on behalf of Railway Sports Promotion Board, Services Sports Control Board and All India Universities
  4. These three members of BCCI, which held full membership earlier, now stand relegated to associate member status without voting rights as per the Lodha committee’s “one state-one vote” recommendation

Note4students:

The accountability and transparency drive into sports bodies’ domain, started by Lodha committee, has taken a new turn here. The issue is worth following. Note the govt arguments, btw!

Nobody can escape the verdict from the highest court of the land: Lodha

  1. What: On Monday, the SC, acting on the third Status report and also on the previous ones, removed president Anurag Thakur and secretary Ajay Shirke from their posts
  2. Why: Not much has changed since the SC’s decision to validate the Justice Lodha committee’s report on reforms in cricket
  3. The reforms proposed a complete makeover of the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) in order to rid the system of a group of individuals who had held on to power for a long time
  4. In the last 5 1/2 months, the SC and the member committee of Justice R.M. Lodha, Ashok Bhan and R.M. Raveendran found that the majority of the BCCI members did not show any inclination in complying with the recommendations before the deadline of Dec 15, 2016
  5. The Lodha Committee filed three Status reports explaining the impediments faced by it in implementing its own recommendations as mandated by the SC
  6. Twice, the Committee proposed to the apex court that the principal office-bearers of the BCCI be replaced by a panel of administrators from within the Board
  7. In its last Status report, the Committee stated that since the SC had accepted its recommendations almost in toto, those who came under the purview of its recommendations stand disqualified or cease to exist
  8. Future action: It’s expected that, most probably on Jan 19, the Committee of Administrators will come into existence
  9. They will ensure that the BCCI’s Memorandum of Association, Rules and Regulations is replaced by the one authored by the Justice Lodha Committee
  10. Clearly, the SC wants the BCCI itself to be part and parcel of the implementation process with the Committee of Administrators playing the facilitator role

Note4students:

All SC judgments are important for mains.

Back2basics:

The Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) is the national governing body for cricket in India. The board was formed in December 1928 as a society, registered under the Tamil Nadu Societies Registration Act. A consortium of state cricket associations and the state associations select their representatives who in turn elect the BCCI officials. BCCI does not depend on the Government of India for its finances.

[op-ed snap] The price of defiance

  1. Context: President and secretary of BCCI have been removed for defying the SC’s order to accept reforms suggested by a court-appointed committee (Lodha Committee)
  2. President Anurag Thakur now faces legal action for contempt of court as well as prosecution for perjury
  3. Supreme Court was only seeking to reform the manner in which cricket is administered in the country
  4. In the court’s view, the appointment of the Justice R.M. Lodha Committee and adoption of its recommendations were part of a project to bring transparency and accountability to the BCCI
  5. While the court expected cooperation and compliance, the BCCI responded with obstructionist tactics and defiance
  6. The SC will now appoint a committee of administrators to supervise the board’s affairs

Note4students:

We have linked the newstrail on this card. Click on the tree icon and read more t consolidate your notes.

Back2Basics:

Recommendations of Lodha Committee:

  1. Lodha panel wants BCCI to come under RTI Act
  2. Recommends legalisation of betting
  3. The panel recommends players and BCCI officials should disclose their assets to the board in a measure to ensure they do not bet
  4. It proposes one state, one vote. Also no proxy voting of individuals
  5. No BCCI office-bearer can have more than two consecutive terms
  6. A maximum of three terms for office bearers with no more than two consecutive terms. It further says there should be a cooling period after each term.
  7. No BCCI office-bearer can be Minister or government servant, recommends Lodha panel
  8. In no case President will hold post for more than 2 years
  9. It recommends a steering committee headed by former Home Secy G K Pillai with Mohinder Amarnath, Diana Eduljee and Anil Kumble
  10. Panel recommends separate governing bodies for the IPL and BCCI

Perjury:

  1. Intentional act of swearing a false oath or of falsifying an affirmation to tell the truth, whether spoken or in writing, concerning matters material to an official proceeding
  2. Contrary to popular misconception, no crime has occurred when a false statement is (intentionally or unintentionally) made while under oath or subject to penalty—instead, criminal culpability only attaches at the instant the declarant falsely asserts the truth of statements (made or to be made) which are material to the outcome of the proceeding
  3. For example, it is not perjury to lie about one’s age except where age is a fact material to influencing the legal result, such as eligibility for old age retirement benefits or whether a person was of an age to have legal capacity.

Appoint Pillai as BCCI observer, Lodha panel tells SC

  1. Who: Former CJI R.M. Lodha-led SC committee
  2. What: It reiterated its recommendation to remove office-bearers who are 70 years old
  3. And also Ministers and those who have already served at the Board’s helm for nine years
  4. This was its third report filed in the apex court, and the panel reiterated that the SC had upheld its recommendations in a July 18, 2016 judgment
  5. It said the time has come to implement them so that work on reforming the Board could go ahead
  6. The panel sought the disqualification of the following: BCCI office bearers who are not Indian citizens
  7. Those who hold any office or post in a sports or athletic association or federation apart from cricket
  8. Those declared insolvent or of unsound mind and administrators charged with a crime

SC rejects BCCI’s charge

  1. Case in SC: Charges were levelled by the BCCI that the Justice R.M. Lodha Committee had exceeded its brief and was trying to “run cricket” in India
  2. Decision: The SC dismissed these charges
  3. The BCCI had argued that while the July 18 judgment of the apex court gave the BCCI a six-month window to implement the changes, the Lodha panel chopped it to just two months
  4. SC View: The Lodha Committee was given full authority to fix specific timelimits

Supreme Court stops BCCI funds to State cricket associations

  1. SC closed shut the funding of the 25 State associations of the BCCI, barring them from using the board’s funds till they accept the Justice Lodha Committee reforms in ‘letter and spirit’
  2. In case the associations continue to resist the Lodha reforms, the money disbursed to them would be invested in fixed deposit accounts until they change their minds
  3. Earlier, SC had warned that there would be no domestic cricket matches if the BCCI and its members do not fall in line with the Lodha Committee reforms

SC to hear Lodha panel plea to remove BCCI top brass

  1. Context: A newly constituted Special Bench of Chief Justice T.S. Thakur and Justices AM Khanwilkar and DY Chandrachud on BCCI issue
  2. What? It will hear Lodha Committee’s recommendation to oust the entire top brass of the cash-rich cricket body
  3. Why oust? For blatant violations of the July 18 Supreme Court judgment directing them to implement the panel’s recommendations for transparency in cricket administration
  4. Background: BCCI thinks they are a law unto themselves. Fall in line or else we will make you- Chief Justice Thakur had warned BCCI earlier

SC ruling on Lodha panel unconstitutional- why?

  1. Overreach: According to former Justice Katju, the Supreme Court has over-reached itself and indulged in judicial legislation
  2. It was also unmindful of the fact that there are several larger Bench decisions prohibiting the same
  3. The order is legislative in nature and could not have been passed validly by the Court
  4. SC could have no doubt forwarded the Lodha Committee’s recommendations to Parliament with their own recommendation that they be enacted as a law by Parliament
  5. However, to direct itself that the recommendations be implemented is clearly a legislative act not within the court’s domain
  6. On Lodha Committee: It was only mandated to examine and make suitable recommendations to the BCCI for such reforms in its practices and procedures and such amendments to the memorandum of association, rules and regulations as may be considered necessary
  7. Instead, the Lodha Committee sent its recommendations to the Supreme Court

SC ruling on Lodha panel unconstitutional, says Katju

  1. Context: BCCI reforms conundrum
  2. News: Former Justice Markandey Katju lashed out at the Supreme Court and its committee led by the former Chief Justice of India R.M. Lodha
  3. Reason: The intention to clean up cricket may be good, but it cannot be done by throwing the law to the winds
  4. Law to the winds: The SC judgment on BCCI to implement suggested reforms has not only violated the Tamil Nadu Societies Registration Act but also the Constitution
  5. Background: Justice Katju was appointed by the BCCI to head a four-member panel to advise and guide it on the July 18 Supreme Court verdict
  6. SC verdict: Asked BCCI to implement the Lodha Committee’s recommendations in six months to overhaul the cricket body to usher in accountability

Supreme Court accepts Lodha panel report- 2

  1. 1 person should hold 1 post in cricket administration to avoid any conflict of interest
  2. There should be a players’ association in the BCCI
  3. Reforms not accepted: Parliament to decide whether the functioning of the BCCI can be brought under RTI as recommended by the Lodha panel
  4. Also, Parliament will be deciding on whether to legalise betting in cricket or not

Supreme Court accepts Lodha panel report- 1

  1. News: The Supreme Court accepted major recommendations of the Lodha Committee on reforms to the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI)
  2. Reforms accepted: Ministers and civil servants and those above 70 are not allowed to become BCCI members
  3. BCCI will have a CAG nominee – scrapped all other administrative committees in the BCCI after the CAG nominee comes in
  4. Members will have a 3-year term with a cooling-off period between 2 successive terms
  5. One-State-One-vote recommendation was accepted – states that have more than 1 cricket association (Maharashtra, Gujarat) will have voting rights on a rotational basis

Lodha panel did not bar politicians from BCCI

  1. News: The Supreme Court clarified to the BCCI that the CJI R.M. Lodha Committee never recommended barring politicians from holding posts in the Board
  2. Clarification: The committee report only suggested a ban on government servants and ministers donning the role of cricket administrators
  3. Rationale: Politicians as a category cannot be barred, there is a politician in everyone

Are you refusing to be reformed, SC asks BCCI

  1. News: SC asks BCCI was against Lodha panel’s recommendation to have a nominee from the CAG office on board
  2. BCCI’s Argument: SC is crossing judicial limits to interfere in its private affairs like internal management, flow of finances and membership patterns
  3. Significance: The apex court said the Lodha Committee recommendations was meant to help the Board perform its public functions in the best way

Don’t delay reforms mooted by Lodha panel, SC tells BCCI

  • Context: Justice Lodha Committee recommendations, which suggested big-reforms in cricket
  • News: SC said that it would not allow delay in the much-needed reforms to usher purity back into Indian cricket
  • The court also questioned cricket administrators holding simultaneous memberships in both the BCCI and State bodies
  • Challenge: BCCI has many complaints with the recommendations of Lodha committee

Read more about Lodha Committee Report

Accept Lodha report, fall in line: SC to BCCI

The court gives BCCI time till March 3 to respond to the Justice Lodha panel report.

  1. Describing the Justice R.M. Lodha Committee report on overhaul of BCCI as straightforward, rational and understandable
  2. The SC sternly advised the cricket body to “fall in line” with the recommendations and save itself further trouble
  3. These recommendations deserve respect. They have come from the most respected members of the legal community, Chief Justice T.S. Thakur said
  4. The “impediments” which would visit the Board, starting with how BCCI would even lose its registration under the Tamil Nadu Registration Act

Sweeping changes recommended in BCCI

  1. The Lodha committee has urged lawmakers to legalise betting in cricket for all except cricket players, officials and administrators.
  2. It recommended that a 9-member apex council replace the present 14-member BCCI working committee.
  3. Govt. servants, ministers should be banned from holding BCCI posts.
  4. Each of the office-bearers shall have a 3-year term and can contest for a maximum 3 terms.
  5. There will be a mandatory cooling-off period after each term.

Lodha committee report to focus on purity of game

  1. The report may change the destiny of the game and its administration for the better.
  2. The report is expected to reveal a mechanism to deal with conflict of interest situations, recommend measures to streamline BCCI elections.
  3. It will fix eligibility of candidates and criteria for disqualification and any other recommendations it sees fit in the BCCI functioning.
  4. The committee was set up by the apex court to usher in reforms in the BCCI, whose decision would be binding on the BCCI.


:( We are working on most probable questions. Do check back this section.







Highest Rated App. Over 3 lakh users. Click to Download!!!