Samachar Manthan | Weekly CA Enforcer + Writing Assessment Program- Starts 17th December

Know more click here | Non Flagship students Join here | Flagship TS subscribers  Join here

12 Aug 2017 | GS 3 | As a premier think-tank of the Government of India, NITI provides critical knowledge, innovation and entrepreneurial support to the country. Critically evaluate the working of NITI Aayog since its inception.

 Discuss

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

  •  Kunal Aggarwal @kunalaggarwal

    Attached

    Attachments:
    •  RK Sahoo @ramakant-sahoo

      OFFICIAL CD REVIEW:
      – Good introduction and conclusion….shorten it further…
      – Good points and articulation of ideas and well structured too…
      – You have breached the word limit ….and be more specific and logically conclude a point like substantiate with A composite water index and the Agricultural marketing index has been developed( do not leave it mid way)
      – more examples and besides the suggestions made , important ones like independent reviews, regulatory impact assessments could have been added.
      -Otherwise very good attempt…work on fine tuning…don’t make it too generalist points esp in such question where u can substantiate.
      Marks Allocated: 5/10

    •  Mohit Raj @mohitraj

      One small doubt, Can we say NITI Aayog a Autonomous body…??
      Though it functions independently but ministers and PM are part of it. In answer, Won’t it be wrong to say it so ??

    •  RK Sahoo @ramakant-sahoo

      Yes the context is functional autonomy here…( though governmental representation is there with PM )…On the similar lines would u call RBI an autonomous body? Yes,it is autonomous in its functioning even though its under government ambit…nevertheless, it is better to explicitly mentioned but otherwise it is implicitly understood just as you have referred in your question…

    •  Mohit Raj @mohitraj

      Got it Sir, Thank you so much…!!

  •  Payal @ibad-shah

    Attached

    Attachments:
    •  RK Sahoo @ramakant-sahoo

      OFFICIAL CD REVIEW:
      – Very good structuring and relevant content especially the examples(keep it up) …you could have mentioned the 3 year agenda and 15 year action plan of Niti Aayog in the 1st part.
      – Solutions and way forward is missing like independent reviews, regulatory impact assessment etc…… conclusion and introduction is average…
      – very good attempt!
      Marks Allocated: 4.5/10

    •  Payal @ibad-shah

      thank u sir

  •  Narayana Sarma @narayanacbe

    National Institution for Transforming India (NITI) Aayog was set up in 2014 as a think tank after scrapping of erstwhile Planning Commission. Since its inception, the autonomous NITI has contributed a lot towards knowledge, innovation and entrepreneurial support. The performance of NITI Aayog has been good so far and it is justified as follows,
    – NITI Aayog has been successful in promoting “Cooperative Federalism” due to bottom to top approach
    – It has developed a “Outcome-based Monitoring” of states through ranking and identification of “Champion States”, thus promoting “Competitive Federalism”
    – NITI Aayog has successfully developed “socio-economic upliftment” schemes such as Sustainable Action for Transforming Health and Education “(SATH)”
    – It has contributed to “innovation growth” by introducing “India Innovation Index”
    – NITI Aayog has offered “knowledge on common areas” Eg: Water Index
    – It has developed short and long term “plans successfully” Eg: “3 Years Action” and “15 Years Vision and Strategy” Plans
    Despite good track records, NITI’s performance is not satisfactory due to following reasons,
    -NITI Aayog is “biased” in favour of “Manufacturing” and lacks focus towards Agriculture or Services
    -NITI Aayog has “not transformed” its policies and visions “into implementation”
    -The “meeting of Team India” under NITI Aayog does “not take place often” and has “no visible results”
    -NITI Aayog, unlike its predecessor, “does not monitor social welfare schemes in states”
    Thus, NITI Aayog has been successful in given time and it could do better. Statutory backing and effective implementation are the ways forward.

    •  RK Sahoo @ramakant-sahoo

      OFFICIAL CD REVIEW:
      – Full marks on enriched content and articulation of answer….impressive points…good structuring and introduction too…please verify when Niti aayog was set up i.e. 1st jan 2015..avoid factual errors..could have included the agri marketing index too..
      – more suggestions for improvement could have been given like independent reviews, Regulatory impact assessment etc..
      – Otherwise, very good answer! keep it up!! going good!!
      Marks Allocated: 5.5/10

    •  Narayana Sarma @narayanacbe

      Thanks a lot @ramakant-sahoo sir. Your reviews have truly helped in improving my answers.

  •  Parvathy @parvathy2490

    Attached

    Attachments:
    •  RK Sahoo @ramakant-sahoo

      OFFICIAL CD REVIEW:
      – Good introduction…the body needs better structuring…points are too general except a few good points…substantiate work of niti aayog from innovation, healthcare angles…examples like agri marketing index, water index, AIM,Indian Innovation Index etc…
      – too much redundancy of few points…The second half needs improvement…Avoid long and complex sentences( Refer to above answer for more clarity)…don’t abruptly end your answer..
      – Keep writing!
      Marks Allocated:3.5/10

  •  LLJ @l-lj

    Attached

    Attachments:
    •  RK Sahoo @ramakant-sahoo

      OFFICIAL CD REVIEW:
      – Good introduction and structuring of your answer…lucid presentation of information…few points and examples are out of box and impressive…
      – However, you have digressed from the demand of the question in the later half…where is the critical analysis of the NITI aayog performance…way forward and suggestions missing….incomplete answer…
      – maintain consistency, good attempt otherwise…you have lot of potential to improve and maximise marks…
      Marks Allocated:4/10

  •  Avancha Anil @avanchaanil04

    Attached

    Attachments:
    •  RK Sahoo @ramakant-sahoo

      OFFICIAL CD REVIEW:
      – Introduction could have been better…structure is good …though you have very good content, articulation and flow of answer is inadequate….( for eg In point 5 and 6 points of first part, clarity of thought is missing….substantiate further…how it helps?? )
      – Use simpler and short sentences..Breakdown longer sentences…Points should convey the message in concise manner..
      – Conclusion – focus on language and better usage of words like Its premature to talk and criticize/ judge performance of niti aayog rather than too easy to talk… few key suggestions of independent reviews, regulatory impact asssessment, statutory backing could have been included.
      – otherwise, good structure and content..work on presentation and language.
      Marks Allocated: 4.5/10

  •  Vk Kumar @vkkumar

    Attached

    Attachments:
    •  RK Sahoo @ramakant-sahoo

      OFFICIAL CD REVIEW:
      – First 5 lines are redundant…just few lines of niti aayog along with its primary objectives is sufficient..such long intro not required.
      – Targeted content is missing…writing in points for better structuring of this answer is advisable…with positives and criticism and way forward…
      – some points are too general…mention the indexes- like water index, argi marketing index, 3 year agenda action plan etc.
      – Work more on content…answer not justifying enough to the critical analysis asked.
      Marks allocated: 3.5/10

    •  Vk Kumar @vkkumar

      Thank you sir. Will write properly as per pointers provided 🙂

  •  Mohit Raj @mohitraj

    Attached

    Attachments:
    •  Mohit Raj @mohitraj

      Please consider picture no 2 and 3 only..!!

    •  RK Sahoo @ramakant-sahoo

      OFFICIAL CD REVIEW:
      – Full marks on lucid presentation, targeted content and structuring too…introduction can be pruned further..just objective in few lines is sufficient, directly jump on to the core part of the question.. and good conclusion too..
      – A way forward and suggestions missing …like statutory backing, independent reviews etc… first sentence of the Conclusion is too long a sentences and complex…use simpler sentences, break it down..
      – otherwise, very good answer! Keep it up!
      Marks Allocated: 5.5/10

    •  Mohit Raj @mohitraj

      Thank you so much Sir,…!!!!
      Your reviews are always with minute details which help me to work comprehensively.

  •  Khemchand Gujjar @khemchand-gujjar

    Attached

    Attachments:
    •  RK Sahoo @ramakant-sahoo

      OFFICIAL CD REVIEW:
      – INTRO is average…too general points in the body…critical analysis needs you to substantiate its achievements and loopholes with examples like water index, agri marketing index, India innovation index…
      – criticism has limited content…you have not provided the suggestions or way forward ..
      – work on language and articulation skills…conclusion okay..
      Marks Allocated: 3.5/10

  •  arjun choudhary @arjun-choudhary1

    Attached

    Attachments:
    •  RK Sahoo @ramakant-sahoo

      OFFICIAL CD REVIEW:
      – Good introduction…avoid grammatical errors like ‘to fostering …’ in first para..
      – impressive content …good points substantiated with examples…
      – avoid repetitive points like cooperative federalism ( twice in first half which is redundancy )
      – criticism is not up to mark..suggestions and way forward could have been better like independent reviews, regulatory impact assessment etc..
      – good presentation and structuring skills( you underline key words, keep it up!!)
      – otherwise, good attempt.. you have potential for much more….keep writing!
      Marks Allocated: 4.5/10

This topic contains 28 replies, has 12 voices, and was last updated by  Vk Kumar 4 months ago.



Highest Rated App. Over 3 lakh users. Click to Download!!!