The Permanent Court of Arbitration decisions against India in the Vodafone and Cairn cases points to the necessity to rethink in India's approach to the Bilateral Investment Treaties. In light of this, examine the issues with India's stand its implications. 10 marks - Civilsdaily

The Permanent Court of Arbitration decisions against India in the Vodafone and Cairn cases points to the necessity to rethink in India’s approach to the Bilateral Investment Treaties. In light of this, examine the issues with India’s stand its implications. 10 marks

Mentor’s comment- https://www.thehindu.com/opinion/lead/despite-arbitration-tug-of-war-mutual-settlement-is-key/article33983317.ece In the intro, briefly describe the purpose of bilateral investment treaties (BITs). In the body, briefly mention … Continue reading The Permanent Court of Arbitration decisions against India in the Vodafone and Cairn cases points to the necessity to rethink in India’s approach to the Bilateral Investment Treaties. In light of this, examine the issues with India’s stand its implications. 10 marks