[op-ed snap] Bureaucracy reboot

Mains Paper 2 : Civil Service |

Note4Students

From UPSC perspective, the following things are important :

Prelims level : Nothing Much

Mains level : Need of laterl entry in civil services

CONTEXT

After selection of nine lateral entrants as joint secretaries in various ministries/departments on a contract basis, the Narendra Modi government plans to extend such induction of private sector domain experts to the lower-level deputy secretary and director posts as well.

Background

• According to a report in this newspaper, the Department of Personnel & Training has been tasked with opening up as many as 400 posts — out of the 1,300-odd at these levels under the Central Staffing Scheme — for lateral hiring.
• If implemented, this would constitute the single biggest reform of public administration in independent India.
• The current administrative system, wherein top positions are manned by career bureaucrats having little specialised knowledge and recruited through a common civil services examination, has clearly outlived its utility.

Need for reforms 

• A liberalised economy requires not generalists, but people who understand industrial processes and new technologies, taxation, finance, trade and investment in a dynamic, globalised setting.
• Even the old “steel frame” model of governance needs revisiting in favour of more nimble, entrepreneurial public service organisations focusing on performance and delivery by incorporating private sector management practices.
• The right approach today would be to fill top/senior government positions by selecting subject matter specialists and posting them in departments for which they are best-suited.
• The nine joint secretary-level lateral hires short-listed by the Union Public Service Commission in April were for specific departments: Agriculture, civil aviation, commerce, economic affairs, environment, financial services, renewable energy, road transport and shipping.
• Alternatively, the “generalists” can be forced to turn “specialists” through mid-career professional development programmes or extended tenures in particular departments/fields.

• A couple of cautionary notes are, however, in order.
• The first is the process of selecting candidates for lateral entry, which has to be transparent, robust and credible.
• Filling 400 posts without conducting formal competitive exams can invite legal challenges, more so if they are seen to be at the expense of the “natural” All-India or Central Civil Services claimants to these jobs.
• Second, if lateral appointments become the order of the day — which they should — what will happen to reservations for communities that are already under-represented in the upper rungs of government?
• Conclusion
• Striking a balance between merit and ensuring adequate representation for disadvantaged communities is necessary even in a regime of lateral entry.