RTI – CIC, RTI Backlog, etc.

[op-ed snap] Diluting a rightop-ed snap


Mains Paper 2: Governance | Important aspects of governance, transparency & accountability

From UPSC perspective, the following things are important:

Prelims level: RTI Act

Mains level: Proposed amendments in the RTI Act and its impact on legislation’s core cause


Bid to tinker with salaries, tenures of information commissioners

  1. The bill to amend the Right to Information (RTI) Act, 2005, that was to be introduced but was deferred in Rajya Sabha, ostensibly pertains only to the status of information commissioners (ICs) at the Centre and in the states
  2. It proposes that “The salaries and allowances payable to and other terms and conditions of service of the chief information commissioner and the information commissioners shall be such as may be prescribed by the central government”
  3. It also states that the ICs “shall hold office for such terms as may be prescribed by the Central government, instead of five years”

Government’s reasoning and its impact

  1. The government has argued that the legislation intends to correct an anomaly in the original Act, which placed ICs on par with election commissioners
  2. If the changes proposed in the bill are carried out, they will dilute the RTI Act considerably

Why is current structure of act important?

  1. The Act allows an Indian citizen to seek “information from any authority in the country on the payment of Rs 10”
  2. Its efficacy hinges on the independence of the commissioners who are the final appellate authority for those denied information
  3. The Act, therefore, stipulates that these officials exercise their powers “without being subject to directions under any other authority”
  4. Making them dependent on the government for their tenure, therefore, strikes at the core mandate of the Act
  5. In fact, the bill, in its original avatar, had a provision for deputy commissioners who would function as per the direction of the government but the Parliamentary Committee recommended the deletion of this clause because “it would curb the independence and autonomy of the commissioners”

Objective of RTI & Way Forward

  1. The fundamental objective of the RTI Act is to ensure transparency in the government’s functioning
  2. Currently, there are four vacancies in the Central Information Commission, even though more than 23,000 appeals are pending before the agency
  3.  In the first week of July, the Supreme Court termed the shortfall in ICs as “very serious” and asked the Centre and the states to fill up the vacant positions
  4. In drafting the new bill, the government also seems to have gone against the spirit of the deliberations in Parliament that led to the enactment of the RTI law

Leave a Reply

Please Login to comment
Notify of