From UPSC perspective, the following things are important :
Prelims level : Basic Vs Fundamental Rights
Mains level : Debate over right to a minimally decent life
- The thought-provoking aftermath of the horrific tragedy in Muzaffarpur, Bihar has led to serious questions on the nature of governance in India.
- First, like the constitutional principle of a basic structure, it is time to articulate an equally robust doctrine of basic rights.
- Second, these basic rights must be viewed primarily as positive, rights not against interference from the state (negative rights) but to the provision of something by it.
- Third, just as individuals are punished for legal violations, the government of the day must also be punished for the violation of these basic rights.
But what are basic rights? How are they different from other fundamental rights?
- Basic rights flow from basic needs such as physical security or subsistence.
- Needs are different from wants. Basic needs are different: their non-fulfillment can cause great harm, even kill.
- Moreover, wants are subjective; one cannot be mistaken We may not be able to tell if we need an antibiotic because mind can’t tell the difference between bacterial and viral infections.
- This determination is done by a more objective criterion. Needs depend on the way human bodies are constituted.
- They are a solid necessity; one cannot get on without them. Nor can they be fulfilled by substitutes. For us, nothing can take the place of water, food and air.
- It is true that though terribly important, basic needs are not what we live for.
- They don’t make our life worth living. But anything really worth pursuing depends on the satisfaction of basic needs.
Their fulfillment: A necessity
- When basic needs are not fully met, we feel vulnerable and helpless. We complain and demand elementary justice from our community, especially from the state.
- Elementary justice requires that before anything else, the state does everything at its disposal to satisfy all basic needs of its citizens, particularly of those who cannot fend for themselves.
- We feel aggrieved when the state abdicates this responsibility.
What does the language of rights add to the idea of basic needs?
First, a right is something that is owed to us; it is not a favour
- So, rights help the recognition of anything that satisfies basic needs as an entitlement.
- Basic rights are claims on the state to provide us with goods and services that satisfy our basic needs.
- Second, when something is identified as a basic right, it puts the state under a duty to enable its exercise. The state becomes its guarantor.
- For example, the right to physical security, the first basic right, is socially guaranteed when the state provides its people a well-trained, professional police force.
- When society and its government render on its commitment to do so, we hold them accountable.
- It follows that basic rights are a shield for the defenseless against the most damaging threats to their life which include starvation, pestilence and disease.
The second is the right to minimum economic security and subsistence, that includes clean air, uncontaminated water, nutritious food, clothing and shelter
- By showing the devastation caused by its absence, the Muzaffarpur tragedy amply proves that the right to primary health care is also an integral part of the right to subsistence.
- A straightforward link exists between malnutrition and disease.
- AES, the biochemical disease that results from eating litchi fruit pulp, occured only in malnourished children.
- It is common knowledge that malnourishment lowers resistance to disease. A similar link exists between disease, unemployment and poverty.
What can be done to ensure minimum basic rights?
- Credible threats to these rights can be reduced by the government by establishing institutions and practices that assist the vulnerable.
- For example, by setting up hospitals with adequate number of doctors, nurses, beds, medical equipment, intensive care units, essential drugs and emergency treatments.
- For this, proper budgetary allocation is required that depends in turn on getting one’s political priority and commitment right.
- When a government fails to provide primary health care to those who can’t afford it, it violates their basic rights.
Need for a Legal Accountability
- To these two basic rights, the author adds a third — the right to free public expression of helplessness and frustration, if deprived of other basic rights.
- The scope of freedom of expression is large and all of it can be deemed basic.
- But the relevant part of it is, the right to make one’s vulnerability public, be informed about the acts of commission and omission of the government regarding anything that adversely affects the satisfaction of basic needs,
- The right to critically examine them and hold state officials publicly accountable is a basic right on a par with right to physical security and subsistence and inseparably linked to them.
The clear message
- In short, defaulting governments must be held legally accountable.
- The systematic violation of basic rights by authorities could be treated on a par with the breakdown of constitutional machinery.
- These three basic rights can be summed up in a single phrase, the right to a minimally decent life. This is a threshold right.
- A society may soar, strive for great collective achievement. There are no limits to the longing for a better life.
- But the point of having a threshold of minimal decency is that our life must not fall below a certain level of existence.
- Anything short of a minimally decent life is simply not acceptable. It is this precisely that horrifies us about the callousness of the Bihar government in Muzaffarpur and governments in India more generally.
- They routinely abdicate responsibility for the suffering they directly or indirectly cause.
- This is why we must ask why governments are not immediately and severely penalized when they undermine the exercise of these basic rights.