Agricultural Sector and Marketing Reforms – eNAM, Model APMC Act, Eco Survey Reco, etc.

[op-ed snap] The shackled Indian farmer


Mains Paper 3: Agriculture | Issues related to direct & indirect farm subsidies & minimum support prices

From the UPSC perspective, the following things are important:

Prelims level: Not much

Mains level: Problems in Indian agricultural setup and solutions for these problems


Woes of farmers rising

  1. Farming in India, mostly done on a small scale, without much technology, or insurance, is one of the most difficult jobs
  2. Farmers deal with tens, if not hundreds, of variables and uncertainty, and still manage
  3. The problem is that farmers are not allowed to use all their resources and engage with global markets

Ways in which Indian farmers are shackled

  • Market limitations
  1. The government has over the years, under the guise of protecting farmers, severely limited the market for their produce
  2. This is institutionalized through the agriculture produce market committee (APMC)
  3. It is obvious that a larger market for any farmer means that more consumers can compete for the produce enabling better prices
  4. However, the APMC prevents this, by dividing the market geographically into different regions and insisting that a farmer can only sell to the mandi in his region
  5. Further, traders in a mandi need a licence
  6. This prevents consumers, wholesale and retail food companies from buying directly from the farmer
  7. Mandi licences are naturally given only to those with political patronage, often used as a side business for politicians
  8. The farmer receives depressed prices, while the final consumer pays a high price for the same produce
  • Minimum support price (MSP)
  1. MSP has been impoverishing farmers and consumers for decades
  2. The government promises high prices, to “help” farmers, but is not able to deliver on those promises by actually buying all the produce
  3. Farmers produce more expecting a high MSP and are forced to dump their produce when MSPs are not delivered
  4. Indian farmers lament when they have a bumper crop as prices and MSP fall
  5. One reason for this is also that India has either heavily regulated or banned futures trading in agriculture
  6. Futures trading helps smooth cycles in the market
  7. However, Indian farmers are not allowed to participate in this kind of market and so they cannot use the bumper crop in a given year to prevent the downside from bad crops in other years
  • The absence of land market
  1. Farmers have been denied a market for land, their biggest asset
  2. In several cases, farmers are not allowed to sell their land to non-farmers, and they cannot themselves easily change the use of their land
  3. This has limited and depressed the market for agricultural land, and the price agricultural land can fetch
  4. Farmers, thus, are unable to exit farming
  • Land titling
  1. Land titling records are such a mess and farmers face additional uncertainty
  2. Goons may possess land illegally in areas where there are no good records
  3. Worse, without good land records, the ability to raise credit using land as collateral is limited
  4. The government has also, with good intention, regulated local moneylenders by limiting the interest rates, further reducing access to credit
  5. This means farmers essentially only have state-owned banks and cooperatives to turn to for credit and are at the mercy of government policies to avail farm loans
  • Controlled inputs
  1. The inputs used by farmers are severely controlled
  2. Farmers are prevented from buying most of their inputs in market settings, because of statutes such as the Essential Commodities Act
  3. The government, having killed the private market for any of these inputs, forces the farmers to now beg for and rely on subsidies
  4. The government, in turn, promises free electricity and water, which are unreliable because of the massive shortages caused without a price system
  5. Farmers would rather pay for the reliable supply of water and electricity than a free subsidy, but in most input areas, private players cannot enter and sell to farmers
  • No experiments in new technologies
  1. Farmers are not allowed to experiment with new technologies used across the world
  2. Whether this is technology in fertilizer, machinery, or pesticides, the Indian government does not allow it
  3. So, farmers must wait for a state-ordained “green revolution”, where new technology is introduced once a century
  4. On the other hand, farmers could be creating their own mini-revolutions every season if they could experiment with global technologies
  5. The most problematic is the partial ban on genetically modified (GM) seeds
  6. A lot of the new GM seeds are more resistant to pests and bacteria, and reduce the need for other inputs such as pesticides, water and fertilizer, with potential for huge gains for farmers
  7. Any experimentation is done illegally and a black market has emerged for GM seeds, harming both farmers and produce

Way forward

  1. Farmers don’t need the help the government has provided over seven decades
  2. The government’s “help” is the cause of the distress
  3. Farmers actually need the government to get out of their way
Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments