Mains Paper 2: Polity | Structure, organization & functioning of the Executive & the Judiciary
From the UPSC perspective, the following things are important:
Prelims level: Right to Self-Defence
Mains level: Expanded scope of the aforesaid right
- The right to self-defence extends not only to one’s own body but to protect the person and property of another; the Supreme Court has interpreted the provisions of the Indian Penal Code (IPC).
- The court acquitted a forest ranger, who was jailed for shooting an alleged sandalwood smuggler in 1988.
Key points of SC ruling
- The court observed that the right of private defence extends not only to “the defence of one’s own body against any offence affecting the human body but also to defend the body of any other person.
- The right also embraces the protection of property, whether one’s own or another person’s, against certain specified offences, namely, theft, robbery, mischief and criminal trespass.
- The court explained that the right does not arise if there is time to have recourse to the protection of the public authorities. Nor does it extend to the infliction of more harm than is necessary.
- When death is caused, the person exercising the right of self-defence must be under reasonable apprehension of death, or grievous hurt, to himself or to those whom he is protecting, the court explained.
Right to Self-defence
- Sections 96 to 106 of the IPC deals with the right to private defence.
- It is not necessary that there should be an actual commission of the offence in order to give rise to the right of private defence.
- A person who faces imminent and reasonable danger of losing his life or limb may in an exercise of self-defence inflict any harm even extending to death on his assailant either when the assault is attempted or directly threatened.
- It is enough if the accused apprehends that such an offence is contemplated and it is likely to be committed if the right of private defence is not exercised, the court ruled.