Do you think that farm size and productivity has an inverse relationship as assumed by our small and marginal farmers? Explain why? What are the important determinants/factors that can help increase farmers’ income? (200 W)

Source:             

https://www.civilsdaily.com/news/op-ed-snap-for-the-farmer-things-to-do/

 

Model Answer:

Farm size can be assessed in many ways such as by mapping land area, value of output, value of sales or profits etc. However, productivity on farm depends on many factors like quality input, labour, modern method, scientific management etc. With study in recent years it has been witnessed that small farmers with small land holdings are able to produce more in comparison to large farm sized farmers.

The reasons for increased production from small landholdings:

  • Hard work: small farmers tend to work on the field themselves rather than hiring employees and employing machines. Hard work with effective monitoring helped them with increased output.
  • Better quality input: small farmers have also been benefitted with the government established institutions. Use of High Yielding Variety of Seeds, Checking soil health and sowing good output crops helped them in increasing farm output.
  • Scientific Management: Apart from this scientific management of farming, productivity and production has also helped them in increasing their farm output.

Does inverse relationship exist?

Productivity on farms depends on many factors. However, with the same traditional method of farming the small land holders were able to produce more with increasing output. This was because of their greater labour input and also there was no modern method of farming for big land holders to compare.

Since, the advent of modern method of farming, the landowners are now able to grow more in big or small farms both. Later, the progressive and commercial farmers started to employ more modern technology hence increasing output in comparison to small land holders.

Hence, we can say that the relationship of farm and output depends on the types of input and timing. The productivity also depends on effective utilization of resources.

However, despite increased productivity ensuring food security for the country through their hard work has not meant greater income and prosperity for the farmers. There are several possible solutions being discussed in the policy circles as how to increase the income of farmers.

In this regard, there are three fundamental sutras for a farmer’s prosperity:

  • Reduction in cost of cultivation
  • Increase in productivity and production and
  • Remunerative price for produce

Important determinants/factors that can help increase farmer’s income:

  • Price of seeds: Seed is the most important input as it is the carrier of scientific research and advancement in agriculture. Therefore, it is necessary that the newer seeds are affordable and accessible for the farmers. Newer varieties are high yielding and also pest and disease resistant.
  • The new hybrid seeds are terminal in nature hence, buying seeds every year for farmers with increasing price (as demand increases) is not possible. Hence, scientist must develop open pollinated varieties with better yields. This will help farmers to grow seeds for their own use from the open pollinated varieties with less or minimum cost.
  • Availability of seeds to public sector institutions: Hybrid varieties developed through public-funded research should be available to the public sector institutions without paying any royalty amount on a non-exclusive basis.
  • Access to formal credit should be made available to all farmers: Also, Agricultural credit should be based on land holding rather than the scale of finance of crops. This will bring equity in the flow of agri-credit and infuse capital in the backward regions in the agriculture sector.
  • Direct investment subsidy to the farmers: Many states have recently opted for direct investment subsidy to the farmers. This has been done on a flat area basis, without linking it to any particular input. Rather than providing cash transfer on a flat basis of the area of landholding, this direct transfer can be designed to incentivise the desired cropping pattern.
  • While agricultural credit can be linked to the landholding and made crop neutral, direct investment subsidy can be linked to the cropping pattern to ensure demand-led cultivation and the judicious usage of natural resources.
  • Through direct subsidy transfer, it should be possible to motivate the farmer to grow millets in a water-scarce area rather than paddy or sugarcane, which further deplete the water table.
  • Allowing the leasing of land will help find out the real tiller of land and it will be possible to extend the benefits of various schemes to the real cultivator rather than the landowner.
  • The unviable size of landholdings in most states: The size of landholding has decreased with some farmers holding average size of land like 0.73 ha and 0.39 ha in UP and Bihar respectively. If we take out the large farmers, then it will become obvious that most of the farmers in UP and Bihar own less than one and a half acres of land. With this landholding size, it is simply not possible to have a decent standard of living unless there are other avenues of additional income for the family.

Conclusion:

  • Therefore, affordable inputs, access to credit and formal land-leasing are some of the urgent requirements for increasing the prosperity of India’s small and marginal farmers.
  • Subscribe

    Do not miss important study material

4
Leave a Reply

Please Login to comment
2 Comment threads
2 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
3 Comment authors
Pritam KumarAnshika SinghDivya Recent comment authors
newest oldest most voted
Divya
Guest
Divya

CDTEST23733

“Farming looks mighty easy when your plough is a pencil and you’re a thousand miles from the corn field”.
Firstly, let us see what is farm size, productivity and their relation.
Farm size can be measured in many ways: by land area, value of output, value of sales or profits and employment.
Productivity is the ratio of output to input in production. It is a measure of the efficiency of production. It is related to the utilization or the use of resources to produce goods. It increases the output. It is the increase of output from each unit in the production process
Undoubtedly the production is dependent on the farm size, but the productivity is not. There are instances that the productivity of the small farms is more than the productivity of the large forms.

Do Inverse relationship still exists?

Many studies belied the general assumption that farm size and productivity have an inverse relationship. This is because, in past using the same technology as employed on the large farms, the smallholder was more productive because of his greater labour input. Hence said that, there is inverse relationship between farm size and productivity.
Later progressive and commercial farmers started to employ a higher level of technology. The small farmer was unable to compete the new technological inputs required investments that went beyond his capacity. Therefore, we cannot state that there is inverse relationship between productivity and farm size. The productivity is also dependent on the effective utilization of the resources.
There are instances where despite of small farm sizes, with the better quality inputs, hard work, scientific management, production and productivity has gone up. This results only when the small and marginal farmers are made accessible to present day technologies and facilities.
Important determinants or factors to increase farmers income:
However, ensuring food security for the country through their hard work and increased production has not meant greater income and prosperity for the farmers.

Three fundamental sutras for a farmer’s prosperity
Reduction in cost of cultivation,
increase in productivity and production, and
remunerative price for produce

1. Price of seeds:
Farmers go for hybrid seeds as these give better yield than the open-pollinated varieties. But the price of hybrid seeds is very much high.
Either scientists have to develop open pollinated varieties with better yields or the price of hybrid seed should bring down.
2. Hybrid varieties developed through public-funded research should be available to the public sector institutions without paying any amount on a non-exclusive basis.
Scientists should continue doing high-end research but for the public sector without accepting royalty from public sector units to make the fruits of science available to the farmers at a reasonable and affordable price.
3. Access to formal credit should be made available to all farmers
Many farmers depend up on informal sectors for credit, which lead to usurious rates and fettering conditions. Therefore, government should provide formal credit to all the farmers at low interest rates.
4. Remunerative price for produce
Many farmers are unhappy with the remunerative prices for the production. Farmers are not getting minimum price and eventually they are unable to pay debts. This is also a reason for suicides of the farmers. The government should bring some stringent policies to satisfy the marginal farmers.
5. Allowing the leasing of land
Allowing the leasing of land will help find out the real tiller of land and it will be possible to extend the benefits of various schemes to the real cultivator rather than the landowner.

Conclusion: Hence, affordable inputs, access to formal credit and new technologies, remunerative price can increase the increase the income of the famers.

Pritam Kumar
Guest

Hi Divya,
-Ideas and points brought are good, but it became too lengthy discussion…it seems you have copied pasted the points…It’s almost like an article and certainly not the answer…
Expertise lies when all these would have been written within word limit given… speaking about wider ideas in limited word is the ability of writing answer…

Though, nice attempt…your effort is appreciable, just need to sync the ideas with sentence articulation, the rest is good and well written…
Keep writing, will improve for sure…

Marks awarded: 5/12.5

Anshika Singh
Guest
Anshika Singh

Q3comment imagecomment imagecomment image

Pritam Kumar
Guest

Hi Anshika,
-Your ideas in first part seems okay…but there is nothing mentioned about inverse relationship…For example: It has been witnessed that small farmers with small landholdings are able to produce more with little investment. This is because of their increased labourship, limited investment, effective monitoring and control etc.
-The rest of the points are good…
-Though, conclusion could have been much better…
-Overall, good approach….well attempted…just need to focus on question and address the aspects asked…
Keep writing…

Marks awarded: 6/12.5