💥Join UPSC 2027,2028 Mentorship (August Batch) + XFactor Notes & Microthemes PDF
Talk to Mentor

Civilsdaily

Login

Search results for: “”

  • Groundwater risk from solar irrigation is a property of the model, not of solar power

    Why in the News

    India’s agricultural solar programme has installed over 2.5 million solar pumps in five years, and the government is now preparing PM-KUSUM 2.0. The standard objection is that free solar power removes every incentive to limit pumping and will therefore deepen the groundwater crisis. That objection treats solar irrigation as a single model, when the groundwater outcome is determined by ownership structure, pricing incentive and local hydrogeology.

    What is PM-KUSUM?

    1. About: The Pradhan Mantri Kisan Urja Suraksha evam Utthan Mahabhiyan (PM-KUSUM) is India’s agricultural solar programme, administered by the Ministry of New and Renewable Energy.
    2. Delivery so far: It has installed over 2.5 million solar pumps over the past five years, made affordable for smallholder farmers through subsidies.
    3. Three routes: It supports decentralised grid connected solar plants on barren land, standalone off grid solar pumps, and the solarisation of existing grid connected agricultural pumps.
    4. Next stage: The government is preparing PM-KUSUM 2.0, whose design challenge is to advance the clean energy transition without worsening an already over exploited groundwater base.

    What is a feed in tariff?

    1. About: A feed in tariff is a guaranteed per unit price at which a distribution utility buys electricity that a small generator exports to the grid.
    2. Why it matters here: A high enough tariff converts every unit of electricity not used for pumping into cash income, so saving water becomes profitable rather than merely virtuous.

    Why is the standard objection to solar irrigation incomplete?

    1. The objection itself: Heavily subsidised or free electricity has driven unsustainable groundwater abstraction, falling water tables, depleting aquifers and growing fiscal burdens on energy utilities, and solar is assumed to extend that pattern.
    2. First gap, the single model assumption: The debate treats solar irrigation as one model, typically a farmer running a standalone pump with no incentive to conserve water, when models differ by design, ownership structure and pricing incentive.
    3. Second gap, energy as the only variable: The debate discounts local hydrogeology, cropping patterns, marginal returns to irrigation and soil type, all of which shape irrigation behaviour independently of the energy source.
    4. Third gap, evaluation in a silo: Solar irrigation is judged as either a water intervention or an energy intervention, when its consequences span water, energy and food together.
    5. The reframed question: The question is not whether solar irrigation is inherently good or bad for groundwater, but what kind of model is deployed, where, and with what incentives.

    How do ownership and pricing change the groundwater outcome?

    1. Grid connected models create a price for restraint: Models that let farmers sell surplus solar electricity back to the grid give a direct financial reward for using less water.
    2. Gujarat’s Suryashakti Kisan Yojana: Around 100 agricultural feeders were transitioned to solar energy under the scheme.
    3. Measured behaviour change: Solar farmers showed significantly slower growth in energy consumption and in irrigation application than non solar farmers, indicating more sustainable water use.
    4. The tariff that produced it: The scheme offered around Rs 7 per unit as a feed in tariff, a meaningful incentive to conserve electricity and export energy.
    5. Income effect: By exporting energy, farmers earned an average of roughly Rs 21,900 annually, converting them from energy consumers into energy producers.
    6. Standalone pumps vary too: Even for standalone off grid pumps under PM-KUSUM, utilisation and the extent to which the pump replaces diesel rather than grid electricity vary widely with installed capacity, the depth of the water table and years of operating experience.

    What does the Bangladesh model show about pricing solar water?

    1. The dominant model there: Bangladesh’s most common arrangement is the fee for service centralised solar model, in which a pump owner supplies water to multiple farmers within a fixed command area.
    2. The revenue logic: The owner earns from selling water, so the pump is operated as a business rather than as a private convenience.
    3. The measured result: Farmers using solar irrigation did not apply more water than farmers using diesel, even though solar irrigation was 20 to 30 percent cheaper.
    4. The mechanism behind it: Excessive irrigation by one farmer reduces the operator’s ability to serve others, so efficient and equitable groundwater use becomes a condition of the business remaining financially sustainable.
    5. What the case demonstrates: A cheaper energy source did not raise water use once the water itself carried a price and a rationing constraint.

    Why does the same pump produce different outcomes across regions?

    1. Hard rock aquifer regions: Where storage capacity is limited and cropping is rainfed, each additional unit of irrigation water yields high marginal benefit, and water use changed little between solar and non solar users regardless of the energy source.
    2. Punjab and Haryana: Irrigation is already widespread and dominated by water intensive rice and wheat, leaving little scope to expand irrigated area, so solar is unlikely to drive further over exploitation.
    3. The real question in those States: Whether solar can make water, energy and food systems more sustainable by replacing subsidised fossil fuel electricity with grid connected solar, cutting subsidy costs and emissions together.
    4. Eastern India: Irrigation expansion has been constrained by access to energy rather than to water, with large rainfed areas, high diesel costs and unreliable power.
    5. Policy consequence: Solar irrigation policy must follow a differentiated regional approach with context specific model choice, paired with stronger groundwater monitoring and adaptive management to catch emerging stress early.

    What does solar irrigation change beyond groundwater?

    1. Emissions from pumping: Groundwater irrigation in India is estimated to generate between 45 and 62 million tonnes of carbon dioxide a year.
    2. Fiscal burden: Agricultural electricity subsidies across States amount to over Rs 1 lakh crore a year.
    3. Per farmer mitigation: Estimates from Gujarat suggest each grid connected solar farmer offsets approximately 12.3 tonnes of carbon dioxide annually through on farm solar use and electricity exported to the grid.
    4. Payback on public money: Subsidies covered nearly one fourth of government investments within the first two years.
    5. Scale of the opportunity: Applied across India’s more than 25 million agricultural pumps, the mitigation and fiscal implications are substantial.

    Should policy prioritise saving water or expanding access?

    1. The case for saving water: In water stressed regions, grid connected solar can be expanded through individual pumps or by taking entire agricultural feeders solar, with both models rewarding farmers for saving water.
    2. The case for expanding access: Where farmers still lack reliable irrigation, the priority is expanding access rather than saving water.
    3. The instrument each case needs: Standalone solar pumps remain the preferred option in areas with limited irrigation, poor grid access and low groundwater risk.
    4. The distributional point: Emphasis should shift from individual ownership to scaling through water user associations, water selling entrepreneurs and farmer cooperatives in India’s most irrigation deprived regions.
    5. Why the tension is real: A single national design cannot simultaneously suppress pumping in Punjab and expand it in Bihar, so the same programme must carry two opposite incentive structures.

    Why has the current design of both models underperformed?

    1. Weak uptake of surplus sale: The approach of paying farmers to save water by selling surplus electricity to the grid has seen limited uptake.
    2. Feeder transitions do not change behaviour: Feeder level transitions to solar have performed better on delivery, but in their current form do little to change pumping behaviour.
    3. What individual pumps need: Simpler grid connection procedures and attractive buyback prices that reflect the local value of water and crops.
    4. What distribution companies need: Distribution companies (DISCOMs), which buy and supply the power, must themselves be incentivised to support the individual pump model.
    5. What feeder solarisation needs: Pairing with water saving incentives such as support for micro irrigation and direct cash payments for reduced pumping, on the model of Punjab’s Pani Bachao Paisa Kamao and Haryana’s Mera Pani Meri Virasat schemes, so the gain is not confined to the distribution company.

    Challenges to PM-KUSUM

    1. Farmer contribution barrier: Even after central and State subsidy, the residual farmer share blocks the poorest applicants. e.g. smallholders in Bihar and Jharkhand, where the same pump costs a larger share of annual income than in Gujarat.
    2. Slow solarisation of existing pumps: Retrofitting grid connected pumps depends on a distribution company agreeing to buy the surplus at a workable price. e.g. the limited uptake of the surplus sale route recorded in the current programme.
    3. Feeder solarisation without behavioural conditions: Solarising a feeder cuts the utility’s power purchase cost without altering how much a farmer pumps. e.g. feeder transitions that improved supply economics while leaving abstraction unchanged.
    4. Unmetered farm supply: Without metering, neither pumping nor saving can be measured, so a water saving payment has no basis. e.g. Punjab, where agricultural supply is largely flat rate and unmetered.
    5. Land availability for decentralised plants: Barren and fallow land near substations is scarce in densely cultivated districts. e.g. canal command areas of western Uttar Pradesh with almost no uncultivated parcels.
    6. After sales service: A solar pump with no local technician becomes a stranded asset. e.g. standalone pumps idling in remote blocks for want of repair and spare parts.
    7. Equity of ownership: Individual ownership concentrates the benefit in farmers who already own a borewell and a landholding. e.g. tenant cultivators and landless water buyers, who gain nothing from a pump subsidy tied to land title.

    Conclusion

    The groundwater question about solar irrigation has been asked at the wrong level, because the outcome is set by ownership structure, pricing incentive and local hydrogeology rather than by the energy source. Gujarat’s feed in tariff and Bangladesh’s fee for service model both show that water use falls once restraint carries a price, while standalone pumps in energy constrained Eastern India are correctly an access instrument rather than a conservation one. PM-KUSUM 2.0 therefore has to carry two opposite incentive structures within one programme, tightened in water stressed States and loosened where irrigation is scarce. The unresolved condition is measurement, since no water saving payment can operate on a farm supply that is neither metered nor monitored.

    “[2025, GS3, 15 marks] Examine the factors responsible for depleting groundwater in India. What are the steps taken by the government to mitigate such depletion of groundwater?”

  • How India plans to count caste now, and what went wrong earlier

    Why in the News

    The Registrar General of India has settled on an open ended question on caste for the ongoing Census, with no predetermined list of castes supplied to the enumerator. The same method in 2011 returned nearly 46.7 lakh distinct caste names and produced no usable table, which places the design of the question, rather than the decision to count, at the centre of the exercise.

    What is an open ended caste question?

    1. How it works: The respondent states a caste in their own words and the enumerator records that answer as given, with no dropdown list or code frame to select from.
    2. No verification step: The enumerator is duty bound to enter what is stated, including a surname offered in place of a caste name.
    3. Errors become data: A misspelling of the stated name becomes an entry in the caste column in its own right.
    4. The colonial precedent: The same open method was used until the 1931 Census, the last census whose caste data were released.

    Why does an open ended question produce unusable data?

    1. Interchangeable names for one group: Rajput, Thakur, Singh and Kshatriya may be used interchangeably by the same respondent for the same identity.
    2. The same name meaning different groups: Rajput in the Bundelkhand region cutting across Uttar Pradesh and Madhya Pradesh may also refer to the Other Backward Class Lodh community.
    3. Surnames that cross categories: Singh is a surname running across castes and across reservation categories, so it identifies nothing on its own.
    4. Volume without structure: The result is a very large number of entries that may all belong to a single caste, with no rule for collapsing them afterwards.
    5. The 2011 outcome: The open method returned nearly 46.7 lakh distinct caste names, against the 4,147 castes recorded in the last comprehensive caste census of 1931.

    What did the 1931 Census reveal about counting caste?

    1. Caste as a subjective category: The 1931 Census report itself recorded the difficulty of enumerating caste once respondents were free to name their own.
    2. New identities appearing between rounds: Sections of the leather working caste among Dalits in Punjab assumed a new religious identity as Aad Dharmis, meaning people of the original, pre Aryan religion of India.
    3. The scale of that shift: 418,789 persons enumerated themselves as Aad Dharmis, roughly the same number as Christians in Punjab at that time, in a category that did not exist in 1921.
    4. The pattern was not local: Similar names appeared in other regions, including Adi Dravida, Adi Andhras and Adi Karnatakas.
    5. Consolidation to bolster numbers: The report recorded grazier castes combining under the term “Yadava” the Ahirs, Goalas, Gopis, Idaiyans and other milkmen castes, a movement already effective in 1921.
    6. What both moves show: Caste counts respond to claims of new social status and to the arithmetic advantage of a larger group, not only to who people are.

    How did caste enumeration lapse after 1931?

    1. 1941: Caste details were collected but caste was dropped from the final tabulation.
    2. 1951: The government led by the first Prime Minister decided there would be no caste enumeration, in a newly independent India shaped by the ideals of equality and secularism.
    3. 2011: The Socio Economic and Caste Census conducted under the then government failed to produce usable caste data because of open ended enumeration.
    4. The data withheld: The Union government eventually withheld the raw caste data from the 2011 exercise.

    What did the Bihar caste survey show about using a list?

    1. The exercise: A statewide caste survey was ordered by the then Chief Minister of Bihar in 2023.
    2. The administrative choice made: State officials compiled a list of castes for the purpose, on the view that enumerating without a list would create an administrative nightmare.
    3. The contest that followed: Questions were raised after the data were released about how the lists were prepared and about the methodology used.
    4. What it establishes: A list makes tabulation possible and simultaneously makes the list itself the contested object, since inclusion and placement decide entitlement.

    What alternative design do experts propose?

    1. A predetermined list: A former chairman of the Indian Council of Social Science Research, who was a member of the expert committee on Telangana’s caste data, holds that a predetermined list is necessary.
    2. Building on lists that already exist: Scheduled Caste, Scheduled Tribe and Other Backward Class lists are already recognised by the government, so only a similar list of castes in the general category is needed for the list to be exhaustive.
    3. The error trade off: Such a list may still carry a margin of error of about 2 to 3 percent, which is smaller than the error produced by open ended enumeration.
    4. Columns for non identification: Separate columns for “no caste” and “no religion” are needed for people who do not identify with either.
    5. Separate questionnaires by group: Distinct questionnaires are proposed for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes, because the exclusion each faces differs, untouchability related for the former and physical and geographical isolation for the latter.
    6. No separate schedule for Other Backward Classes: A separate questionnaire is held to be unnecessary for OBCs, since social and educational backwardness would be captured by the Census exercise anyway.
    7. Questions on internal hierarchy: A Valmiki community activist campaigning for sub categorisation holds that the schedule must ask about hierarchies and exclusions within the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes, since some castes within them are more deprived than others.

    How many caste groups does the state already recognise?

    1. Scheduled Castes: The Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment lists 1,208 Scheduled Castes, with different castes appearing in the category in different States.
    2. Scheduled Tribes: A Press Information Bureau year end release of 2022 lists exactly 730 Scheduled Tribes.
    3. What the two lists prove: A workable, State specific enumeration frame already exists for the reserved categories, which is why the general category is the only gap in a list based design.
    4. The residual problem: The lists are State specific, so a single national code frame still has to reconcile the same caste appearing in different categories across States.

    Challenges to caste enumeration in the Census

    1. Self declaration cannot be verified: No enumerator can test a stated caste against any record, so the count is a record of claims. e.g. the 1931 appearance of 418,789 Aad Dharmis in Punjab was a reclassification, not a demographic change.
    2. Category and caste are conflated: Respondents answer with a reservation category rather than a caste, which destroys the disaggregation the exercise exists to produce. e.g. an entry of “OBC” or “General” tells the statistical office nothing about the specific community.
    3. State specific lists break national aggregation: The same caste name sits in different categories in different States. e.g. a community listed as OBC in one State appears in the general category in a neighbouring one, so a national total is not additive.
    4. Political stakes shape the answer: Enumeration takes place while reservation and sub categorisation demands are live, which gives groups a reason to consolidate. e.g. the Yadava consolidation of Ahirs, Goalas, Gopis and Idaiyans recorded in 1931 combined several castes into one larger head.
    5. Enumerator discretion at the point of entry: With no code frame, spelling, phrasing and abbreviation decisions rest with the field functionary. e.g. a misspelt surname entered as a caste becomes a distinct caste in the final dataset.
    6. Publication risk: Caste tables invite legal and political contest, which creates an incentive to withhold rather than release. e.g. the raw caste data of the 2011 exercise were never published.
    7. Sub caste invisibility: A single caste head hides sharp deprivation differences within it. e.g. sub categorisation demands within the Scheduled Castes rest on the claim that a few communities capture most of the benefit.

    Conclusion

    The choice of an open ended caste question repeats the design that failed in 2011 and that the 1931 report had already flagged as unstable. A predetermined list built on the existing Scheduled Caste, Scheduled Tribe and Other Backward Class rolls, extended to the general category, is the correction experts have placed on record, along with separate questionnaires for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes and questions on internal hierarchy. The self enumeration window is currently open, so the question design is close to being frozen. Whether the exercise yields a usable caste table will be settled by the code frame, not by the decision to count.

    “[2009] Consider the following statements:

    1. Between Census 1951 and Census 2001, the density of the population of India has increased more than three times.

    2. Between Census 1951 and Census 2001, the annual growth rate (exponential) of the population of India has doubled.

    Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

    (a) 1 only

    (b) 2 only

    (c) Both 1 and 2

    (d) Neither 1 nor 2

  • [20th August 2026] The Hindu OpED: The IISERs have a leadership problem

    Question (2014, GS2): “Should the premier institutes like IITs/IIMs be allowed to retain premier status, allowed more academic independence in designing courses and also decide mode/criteria of selection of students? Discuss in light of the growing challenges.
    Linkage: This question directly addresses the central conflict in your prompt: the struggle of premier national science and technology institutes to maintain their academic independence and elite status when confronted with structural and administrative constraints.

    Mentor Comment

    Several of the seven Indian Institutes of Science Education and Research are operating under temporary, divided or incomplete leadership, with chairpersons holding simultaneous charge of two or three other institutions and nominated positions for eminent scientists lying vacant. The institutions were created to give students an intellectually vibrant research environment and prize autonomy as an essential ingredient of good science, which sits against a statutory Board structure dominated by government officials and nominees.

    What are the Indian Institutes of Science Education and Research?

    1. Why they were created: The Indian government created the Indian Institutes of Science Education and Research (IISERs) to offer students an intellectually vibrant research environment and to bring them into research at a relatively early stage by the standards of the Indian system.
    2. What they prize: They treat autonomy as an essential ingredient of good science, specifically the ability of scientists to decide which questions are worth pursuing and with what resources, and top down control is inimical to that vision.
    3. Their statutory basis: They were brought within the framework of the National Institutes of Technology, Science Education and Research Act, 2007.
    4. How many there are: Seven IISERs are in operation, each with its own Board of Governors.

    How are IISER Boards of Governors constituted?

    1. The statutory requirement: The 2007 Act requires each IISER to have a Board of Governors that includes senior government officials and other government nominees.
    2. Named ex officio positions: The IISER statutes specify, among others, the secretary of higher education and the director of the Indian Institute of Science (IISc), Bengaluru.
    3. The accountability rationale: Publicly funded science should be publicly accountable, which is the justification for the government presence on the Boards.
    4. Where the rationale runs out: Suboptimal appointments or outright vacancies are objectionable because they lead to policy paralysis at best, which is a failure of accountability rather than an exercise of it.

    What does the current composition of the seven Boards show?

    1. The IISc director’s spread: The director of the Indian Institute of Science is an ex officio member of most IISERs.
    2. IISER Pune: The chair of its Board is also the chairperson of the Visvesvaraya National Institute of Technology, Nagpur.
    3. IISER Berhampur: Its Board chair was given additional charge while also chairing the Board of the Indian Institute of Information Technology, Guwahati. Nominated positions on the same Board lie vacant, including one for an Indian Institute of Technology director and two for eminent scientists.
    4. IISER Bhopal: Its current director is listed as director in charge, after the previous director left to join NITI Aayog in June.
    5. IISER Thiruvananthapuram: Its chairperson simultaneously chairs the Boards of the Indian Institute of Information Technology, Kottayam and the Indian Institute of Information Technology, Design and Manufacturing, Kurnool.
    6. The cumulative position: Interim appointments are routine and vacancies arise during transitions, and ex officio positions change when officials move between posts, but taken together several IISERs are operating under temporary or incomplete leadership.

    Who is leading India’s basic science institutions?

    1. IISER Pune’s chairperson: A retired Indian Administrative Service officer whose educational background is in commerce and journalism.
    2. IISER Pune’s director: A chemical engineer by training, whereas the IISERs have little focus on engineering.
    3. IISER Thiruvananthapuram’s chairperson: A surgeon.
    4. IISER Tirupati’s chairperson: A chemical engineer and the co founder of an industrial group.
    5. IISER Berhampur’s chairperson: An executive in the footwear industry.
    6. The measurable outcome: Going by awards, fellowships or global achievement and recognition, there are few outstanding scientists in positions of authority on the IISER Boards today.

    Why does the professional background of a chairperson matter for a basic science institution?

    1. There is no legal bar: No rule requires that the chairperson of a scientific institution must be a scientist.
    2. Why it matters regardless: It bears on each institution’s credibility and on its vision, both of which rest on who is seen to be setting the research direction.
    3. What the Boards do gain from outsiders: Expertise in administration, industry, finance and public policy is genuinely useful to a Board.
    4. What the case for scientists rests on: Institutions focused on basic science should draw their leadership from the scientific community, where many people combine distinguished research careers with substantial experience in running academic and research organisations.
    5. The practice that was dropped: The government had earlier appointed the finest scientists to the IISERs’ helm before discontinuing the practice.
    6. The question that actually arises: It is not whether the current leaders are competent, it is why India’s many accomplished scientists are not being asked to lead institutions whose central purpose is basic science.

    How does divided and interim leadership weaken institutional autonomy?

    1. Attention divided across institutions: Leaders whose attention is already split between two or three institutions cannot supply sustained direction to any one of them.
    2. Control shifting away from scientists: With outsiders and divided attention at the top, scientists have less control over decisions that affect their own work.
    3. Rotation instead of recruitment: The availability of a research cadre calls into question the practice of moving the same people between institutions rather than recruiting from the scientific community.
    4. Administration falling behind: People familiar with the IISERs’ functioning describe an administration losing its ability to keep up with students’ needs in respect of a good education in basic science.
    5. The internal assessment: A senior scientist at one of the IISERs described the position as one in which there is no vision or imagination and no sense of leadership propelling the institution towards its core goals of carrying out high quality frontier research in and teaching basic science at an international level.
    6. The powers that go unused: By design, the directors and the Board hold the power to institute positive changes, so the deficit is one of direction rather than of authority.

    Challenges to institutional autonomy in India’s basic science institutions

    1. Lagging decline masked by reputation: An institution whose governance has begun to decline can remain scientifically productive for years as long as the people who built its reputation remain and the institutional label is still valuable, which delays any corrective response. e.g. the IISERs continue to attract strong entrants through the joint admission route while several Boards run without full leadership.
    2. Concentration of authority: Weak collegial governance shifts decisions towards a small group at the top, reducing faculty participation in academic direction. e.g. the flagging of a risk of concentration of authority as a consequence of the IISERs’ present leadership arrangements.
    3. Risk averse research culture: Where leadership lacks a research background, funding and hiring decisions favour safe incremental work over frontier problems. e.g. the expectation of an increasingly risk averse institutional culture as the cumulative effect of the IISERs’ governance decline.
    4. Vacancies in nominated positions: Seats reserved for eminent scientists and institute directors go unfilled, removing the very expertise the statute intended the Board to carry. e.g. the IISER Berhampur Board, with one Indian Institute of Technology director position and two eminent scientist positions vacant.
    5. Interim leadership without a mandate: A director in charge cannot commit an institution to long horizon research investments. e.g. IISER Bhopal, run by a director in charge after the previous director left for NITI Aayog in June.
    6. Government nominee dominance: The statutory requirement of senior officials and nominees on the Board makes institutional direction dependent on the postings cycle of the civil service. e.g. the ex officio membership of the secretary of higher education on IISER Boards under the 2007 Act statutes.
    7. Underfunding of basic research: India’s gross expenditure on research and development remains below one per cent of gross domestic product, so institutional autonomy is further constrained by dependence on annual government grants. e.g. the persistent share of roughly 0.64 per cent of gross domestic product against the two per cent and above spent by comparable research economies.
    8. Faculty attrition to better resourced systems: Weak governance and uncertain research support push early career scientists towards positions abroad or in the private sector. e.g. the reliance of schemes such as Ramanujan and Ramalingaswami fellowships on reversing exactly this outflow.

    Conclusion

    The IISERs were created on the premise that scientists deciding their own research questions produces better science than top down direction, and the statutory Board structure was the accountability counterweight to that autonomy. The counterweight has become the whole of it, with chairpersons drawn from outside the scientific community, ex officio members spread across several institutions, and seats reserved for eminent scientists left vacant. Restoring the earlier practice of appointing distinguished scientists to the helm, and filling the nominated positions the statutes already provide, requires no change in the law.

    Basic Scientific Research in India

    1. What it covers: Basic research is investigation directed at understanding fundamental phenomena without a specified application, distinguished from applied research and from experimental development.
    2. Institutional spread: It is conducted through the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research laboratories, the Department of Atomic Energy and Department of Space institutions, the Indian Institutes of Science Education and Research, the Indian Institute of Science, the Tata Institute of Fundamental Research and the central universities.
    3. Scale of national spending: India’s gross expenditure on research and development stands at roughly 0.64 per cent of gross domestic product, against about two per cent or more in most comparable research economies.
    4. Composition of that spending: The government accounts for the larger share of research spending in India, whereas in most leading research economies the private sector accounts for the bulk of it.
    5. Global standing on output: India ranks among the top three countries in the world by annual volume of scientific publications, and its citation impact remains below that publication rank.
    6. The IISER model: The IISERs were designed as a distinct category from the Indian Institutes of Technology, combining a five year integrated science programme with a research faculty, so that undergraduates enter laboratories early.
    7. The funding reform: The Anusandhan National Research Foundation, established under the Anusandhan National Research Foundation Act, 2023, is intended to fund research across universities and colleges, with a substantial share of its corpus expected from non government sources.

    Government Initiatives for Science Education and Research

    1. Anusandhan National Research Foundation: Established under the Anusandhan National Research Foundation Act, 2023 as the apex body for seeding, growing and promoting research across the natural sciences, engineering, mathematics, environmental and earth sciences, health and agriculture, with a mandate to fund university and college research.
    2. INSPIRE: The Innovation in Science Pursuit for Inspired Research programme of the Department of Science and Technology offers scholarships to school students, undergraduate and postgraduate scholarships in the basic and natural sciences, and faculty fellowships.
    3. Kishore Vaigyanik Protsahan Yojana: A fellowship programme to identify and support students with an aptitude for research careers in the basic sciences, since merged into the INSPIRE stream.
    4. Ramanujan and Ramalingaswami Re entry Fellowships: Offered by the Science and Engineering Research Board and the Department of Biotechnology respectively to bring Indian scientists working abroad back into Indian institutions.
    5. PM Research Fellowship: Provides doctoral fellowships at institutions of national importance with an enhanced stipend and a research grant, to retain top undergraduates within the domestic research system.
    6. National Research Professorship and J.C. Bose Fellowship: Recognise and support distinguished scientists to continue active research beyond conventional retirement.
    7. Vigyan Jyoti and Women in Science and Engineering KIRAN: Target the participation of girls and women in science, technology, engineering and mathematics education and research careers.

    Key Facts about the IISERs

    1. Number and locations: Seven institutes, at Kolkata, Pune, Mohali, Bhopal, Thiruvananthapuram, Tirupati and Berhampur.
    2. Year of first establishment: The first two, at Kolkata and Pune, were established in 2006, followed by Mohali in 2007, Bhopal and Thiruvananthapuram in 2008, Tirupati in 2015 and Berhampur in 2016.
    3. Statutory status: They are Institutes of National Importance under the National Institutes of Technology, Science Education and Research Act, 2007.
    4. Administering ministry: The Department of Higher Education in the Ministry of Education.
    5. Flagship programme: A five year BS-MS dual degree in the basic sciences, with admission through the IISER Aptitude Test and other channels.
    6. Governance structure: A Board of Governors chaired by a chairperson, with a director as the chief executive, and a Senate for academic matters.
    7. Named ex officio Board members: The secretary of higher education and the director of the Indian Institute of Science, Bengaluru, among others.

    Back2Basics: National Institutes of Technology, Science Education and Research Act, 2007

    1. What it is: A central Act that declares certain institutions to be Institutes of National Importance and provides for their incorporation, governance and funding.
    2. Enacted: 2007, originally covering the National Institutes of Technology, and later extended to the IISERs and to the Indian Institutes of Engineering Science and Technology.
    3. What Institute of National Importance status confers: Autonomy to award its own degrees, direct central funding, and exclusion from the University Grants Commission’s affiliation framework.
    4. Governance it prescribes: Each institute has a Board of Governors as the principal executive body, a Senate for academic decisions, a chairperson, a director and a registrar.
    5. Composition requirement: The Board must include senior government officials and other government nominees, which is the provision that places the secretary of higher education and the Indian Institute of Science director on IISER Boards through the institute statutes.
    6. The Council: The Act also creates a Council for the institutes it covers, chaired by the Union Minister in charge, to coordinate across them.
    7. Why it governs this item: It is the statutory source of both the IISERs’ autonomy and the government dominated Board structure that the present appointments have made the operative feature.

    Way Forward

    1. Restore scientist leadership at the helm: Reviving the earlier practice of appointing distinguished scientists as chairpersons and directors requires no amendment to the 2007 Act, only a change in the selection practice.
    2. Fill the vacant nominated seats: Appointing to the eminent scientist and institute director positions already provided in the statutes restores the scientific expertise the Board structure was designed to carry.
    3. Bar simultaneous multiple chairmanships: A rule against holding the chair of more than one Institute of National Importance would end the divided attention that leaves several IISERs without sustained direction.
    4. Time bound filling of directorships: A fixed outer limit on how long an institute may run under a director in charge would prevent interim leadership becoming the standing arrangement.
    5. Publish selection criteria and search process: A transparent search committee process, with published criteria for research standing and institution building experience, would make appointments contestable on merit.
    6. Build a leadership pipeline from the research cadre: Structured administrative training for mid career scientists would widen the pool beyond the same individuals rotated between institutions.
    7. Strengthen Senate authority over academic direction: Vesting curriculum, faculty recruitment and research priorities firmly with the Senate would insulate scientific decisions from Board level turnover.
    8. Raise and stabilise research funding: Multi year block grants through the Anusandhan National Research Foundation would reduce the dependence on annual allocations that constrains long horizon research.

  • Transmission Constraints Emerge as the Binding Limit on India’s Renewable Expansion

    Why in the News

    Insufficient transmission lines have emerged as a major obstacle to India’s renewable energy expansion, with many solar projects being curtailed during daylight hours, a rating agency assessment released on 19 August 2026 found. The constraint has shifted the binding limit on India’s energy transition from how fast capacity can be built to how much of it the grid can actually carry, and new project bidding has collapsed in response.

    What is curtailment of renewable power?

    1. Forced reduction of output: Curtailment occurs when a power generator is forced to reduce or stop producing electricity because of oversupply and grid congestion, even though the plant is capable of generating.
    2. Why solar is hit hardest: Solar output peaks in the middle of the day, when several projects on the same corridor feed in simultaneously and demand is not correspondingly high, so the surplus cannot be evacuated.
    3. What it costs the generator: A curtailed unit is generation permanently lost, since sunlight cannot be stored without additional storage capacity, and the fixed cost of the asset continues to accrue against a smaller output.
    4. Scale of the problem: Around 37% of renewable energy capacity at substations affected by curtailment in the northern, western and southern regions operates under short term access arrangements, and this capacity faces 30% to 50% curtailment during the day.

    What is Temporary General Network Access?

    1. Short term use of spare grid capacity: Temporary General Network Access (T-GNA) is a short term arrangement that allows a renewable energy project to use available capacity on the inter-State transmission system, typically for periods ranging from a single time block to about 11 months.
    2. Why it is precarious: T-GNA gives no firm entitlement to evacuate power, so projects operating under it are particularly vulnerable to curtailment, which raises their operational costs and, on prolonged use, reduces the supplier’s revenues.

    What is the inter-State transmission system?

    1. The national transmission backbone: The inter-State transmission system is the network of high voltage lines and substations that carries power across State boundaries, planned centrally and operated as a single national grid, on which access rights are allotted separately from generation approvals.

    What is a Power Purchase Agreement?

    1. The contract that makes a project bankable: A Power Purchase Agreement (PPA) is the long term contract under which a distribution company or intermediary agrees to buy a defined quantity of power from a generator at an agreed tariff, and without a signed PPA a project has no assured revenue stream against which lenders will disburse.

    What is firm and dispatchable renewable energy?

    1. Renewable power with an assured supply obligation: Firm and dispatchable renewable energy (FDRE) is renewable generation contracted with an obligation to supply a specified quantum during specified hours, achieved by combining solar, wind and storage, so that the buyer receives a guaranteed profile rather than whatever the weather delivers.

    What is round the clock renewable power?

    1. Renewable supply across all 24 hours: Round the clock (RTC) power is a contracting structure in which the developer commits to supply renewable energy across every hour of the day at a specified availability, again by combining complementary sources with storage.

    How severe is the curtailment, region by region?

    1. The affected regions: Curtailment at substations has been recorded in the northern, western and southern regions, the three regions carrying the bulk of India’s solar and wind capacity.
    2. Share on temporary access: Around 37% of renewable capacity at affected substations across these three regions operates under T-GNA.
    3. The daily loss: Capacity operating under T-GNA faces 30% to 50% curtailment during daylight hours.
    4. Western region: About 55% of the affected capacity in western India was under T-GNA, and peak curtailment reached 8,617 MW as of 6 August 2026.
    5. Northern region: The corresponding peak curtailment figure for the northern region was 5,573 MW.
    6. What the concentration means: The western region, which hosts the largest solar and wind clusters, is also the region most dependent on temporary access, so the two vulnerabilities compound rather than offset.

    Why has new capacity bidding collapsed even as construction continues?

    1. Construction pipeline remains large: More than 150 GW of renewable projects were under construction as of 30 June 2026.
    2. Awards have fallen sharply: After 40.6 GW was awarded in 2024-25, awards fell to 14.7 GW in 2025-26 and stood at only 4.7 GW through 10 August 2026.
    3. Contracts awarded but not signed: Between 40 GW and 45 GW of capacity with bids already awarded remained without signed PPAs as of April 2026.
    4. Delays in firming PPAs: Delays in converting awarded bids into signed PPAs are identified as an impediment independent of the transmission constraint.
    5. Land acquisition: Land acquisition for both generation sites and transmission corridors continues to stall projects.
    6. Distribution company finances: The financial position of distribution companies limits their willingness to sign long term purchase obligations at all, since a new PPA adds a fixed payment liability to a stressed balance sheet.
    7. The bidding mix is changing: New bidding is shifting toward firm and dispatchable renewable energy and round the clock power, which require storage and therefore carry a higher tariff than plain solar.

    Is the binding constraint on India’s energy transition generation capacity or grid capacity?

    1. The generation side is not the problem: More than 150 GW is under construction and renewable energy including large hydro is projected to account for more than 35% of electricity generation by 2029-30, against 22% in 2024-25.
    2. The evacuation side is: Capacity is being commissioned faster than transmission corridors are being built, which is why up to half of the output of projects on temporary access is being discarded during the hours it is generated.
    3. The market has already priced the constraint: New awards fell from 40.6 GW to 4.7 GW in eighteen months, which is the developer response to a corridor that cannot carry what is already built.
    4. Storage is the second missing input: Timely execution of intra-State and inter-State transmission infrastructure, along with greater storage capacity, is identified as critical to sustaining renewable additions, because a line that is congested at noon is idle at night.
    5. Why this reframes the target: A target expressed in installed capacity measures what has been built, while a target expressed in share of generation measures what actually reaches consumers, and curtailment is precisely the gap between the two.

    How is transmission and renewable infrastructure financed in India?

    Source: Backgrounder, Infrastructure Financing.docx

    1. Why bank lending failed: Commercial banks funded 25 to 30 year infrastructure assets with one to three year deposits, and this asset liability mismatch produced stressed assets crossing Rs 10 lakh crore in Indian banking by 2017.
    2. National Bank for Financing Infrastructure and Development: Established in 2021 under a dedicated Act of Parliament as India’s first dedicated infrastructure development finance institution, providing non recourse long term financing with 20 to 30 year tenors that match infrastructure asset life.
    3. Its scale: As of December 2025 it had sanctioned approximately Rs 3.03 lakh crore and disbursed approximately Rs 1.09 lakh crore.
    4. Partial Credit Enhancement: It partially guarantees bonds issued by infrastructure companies and special purpose vehicles, upgrading their credit rating from BBB to AA or AAA so that insurance companies and pension funds can participate, with the first such facility sanctioned in February 2026.
    5. Sector specific development finance institutions: REC and PFC finance power generation, transmission and distribution by raising long term bonds and lending to State electricity boards and private power companies.
    6. POWERGRID InvIT: The first Infrastructure Investment Trust in the power sector, set up in 2020, with proceeds channelled into new and under construction transmission projects.
    7. How an InvIT recycles capital: The sponsor transfers only the right to collect revenues for a defined concession period and receives upfront capital which it reinvests in new projects, while ownership is never transferred and the asset reverts at the end of the concession.
    8. The SEBI safeguard: SEBI requires a minimum of 80% of InvIT assets to be in completed operational projects, which protects investors from construction risk, and InvITs may raise debt up to 49% of asset value.
    9. Infrastructure Risk Guarantee Fund: Announced in the 2026-27 Budget, it provides partial guarantees to lenders financing infrastructure projects, covering a portion of the loss on default so that lenders extend credit where they previously refused, while the partial cover preserves due diligence incentives.
    10. Sovereign green bonds: Issued by the Government of India since 2022-23 with proceeds ring fenced for renewable energy, clean transport and sustainable water management, establishing a sovereign benchmark for long term green paper.
    11. The recycling logic: The architecture is designed so that the government builds, the asset stabilises and generates revenue, the asset is monetised through an InvIT, and the capital returns to fund the next tranche of the National Infrastructure Pipeline without a fresh budget allocation each cycle.
    12. Monetisation targets: The National Monetisation Pipeline 2.0, announced in February 2026, targets Rs 16.72 lakh crore including private sector investment of Rs 5.8 lakh crore over 2025-26 to 2029-30, nearly three times the first pipeline’s target.

    Challenges to India’s Renewable Energy Expansion

    1. Transmission build lags generation build: A solar park can be commissioned in about a year while a high voltage corridor takes several years, so the two cannot be commissioned in step. e.g. peak curtailment in western India reached 8,617 MW as of 6 August 2026 on capacity that was already generating.
    2. Temporary access gives no firm evacuation right: Projects on T-GNA can be curtailed at the system operator’s discretion, which makes their revenue unpredictable and their debt harder to service. e.g. around 37% of affected capacity across three regions runs on T-GNA and faces 30% to 50% daytime curtailment.
    3. Storage capacity is inadequate to absorb the midday surplus: Without batteries or pumped hydro the same corridor is congested at noon and underused at night. e.g. the shift in new bidding toward firm and dispatchable and round the clock contracts is itself an admission that plain solar without storage no longer clears.
    4. Distribution company finances limit offtake: Loss making distribution utilities avoid signing new long term purchase obligations irrespective of tariff. e.g. 40 GW to 45 GW of awarded capacity remained without signed PPAs as of April 2026.
    5. Right of way and land acquisition for transmission corridors: Transmission lines cross many districts and require sustained land and forest clearances along the whole route. e.g. land acquisition is named alongside transmission constraints as an independent impediment to project completion.
    6. Geographic concentration of resource: Solar and wind resources are concentrated in a few States while demand centres lie elsewhere, so the transition is dependent on long distance evacuation. e.g. the western and northern regions together account for the two largest curtailment figures recorded.
    7. Tariff pressure from cheap early bids: Projects awarded at very low tariffs in earlier competitive rounds have thin margins that curtailment erases entirely. e.g. the collapse of awards from 40.6 GW in 2024-25 to 4.7 GW through August 2026 shows developers withdrawing rather than bidding lower.
    8. Grid stability with high variable renewable share: A grid carrying more than 35% renewable generation needs inertia, frequency response and balancing reserves that thermal plants currently supply. e.g. must run thermal capacity has to be retained and paid for even as it operates at low plant load factors.
    9. Module and cell supply chain dependence: Domestic content requirements raise capital costs while imported modules expose projects to trade policy shocks. e.g. changes in duty on imported solar cells and modules have repeatedly reset project economics after bids were submitted.
    10. Delayed payments to generators: Payment delays by distribution utilities strain developer working capital independently of curtailment. e.g. the late payment surcharge rules had to be framed specifically to enforce a payment discipline that contracts alone did not achieve.

    Conclusion

    India’s renewable programme has moved past the point where generation capacity is the constraint, and the evidence for that is a 150 GW construction pipeline coexisting with up to 50% daytime curtailment on capacity that is already running. The market has responded not by building more but by bidding less, with awards falling from 40.6 GW to 4.7 GW in eighteen months, and by shifting toward firm and dispatchable contracts that price the constraint into the tariff. Whether renewable energy reaches more than 35% of generation by 2029-30 now depends on the execution of intra-State and inter-State transmission lines and on storage capacity, not on the pace of solar commissioning.

    “[2022, GS3, 15 marks] Do you think India will meet 50 percent of its energy needs from renewable energy by 2030 ? Justify your answer. How will the shift of subsidies from fossil fuels to renewables help achieve the above objective? Explain.”

  • Supreme Court makes school students the instrument for changing household waste behaviour

    Why in the News

    The Supreme Court has directed the Department of School and Higher Education to integrate theoretical and practical instruction on solid waste management so that students train their own family members. The order rejects the assumption that solid waste is a problem for sanitary workers alone, holding that a minuscule number of sanitary workers cannot handle the waste generated by a population of 1.4 billion. The order was passed on 18 August and released on Wednesday.

    What are the Solid Waste Management Rules, 2026?

    1. About: The Solid Waste Management (SWM) Rules, 2026 are the subordinate rules that set the national standards for the segregation, collection, transport, processing and disposal of municipal solid waste.
    2. Benchmark for audit: The Court treated these Rules as the extant standard against which existing waste infrastructure must be completely audited and upgraded.
    3. Where implementation power sits: The Court agreed with the Additional Solicitor General that the true power to implement the Rules lies with householders, local body officers and every direct and indirect contributor of waste, not with the municipal machinery alone.

    What are the five categories of waste the Court identified?

    1. Biodegradable waste: Organic waste from kitchens, markets and gardens that decomposes and is treatable by composting or biomethanation.
    2. Non biodegradable waste: Plastics, metals, glass and packaging that persist and require material recovery or recycling.
    3. Hazardous waste: Waste with toxic, corrosive, reactive or infectious properties requiring specialised handling and treatment.
    4. Electronic waste: Discarded electrical and electronic equipment carrying both recoverable metals and toxic components.
    5. Construction waste: Debris from building, renovation and demolition, which is the heaviest stream by volume in a growing city.
    6. The Court’s conclusion from the set: The volume and complexity of these five streams have outgrown what any single class of workers can be expected to handle.

    Why did the Court call the sanitary worker assumption constitutionally unethical?

    1. The prevailing assumption: The Bench held that the assumption that solid waste is a problem for sanitary workers alone, while the rest of the population remains passive generators, is neither legally correct nor practically sustainable, and is constitutionally unethical.
    2. The general feeling in society: The Court described the regrettable attitude as one where a person is entitled to generate but not to cooperate and control the impact of solid waste management at the threshold.
    3. Arithmetic of the mismatch: Every human being and their activities result in pollution, yet all contributors expect a minuscule percentage of sanitary workers to handle it.
    4. The responsibility it fixed: The Court held that this perception shall be eradicated and that waste management shall be the responsibility of all contributors.
    5. The public health warning: Continued complacency would lead to pandemic and endemic situations.

    What monitoring machinery has the Court already put in place?

    1. Trigger for the committee: The imbalance between the volume of waste generated and the infrastructure to collect it alarmed the Court on 25 May, when it constituted a monitoring committee.
    2. Five Union Secretaries: The committee comprises the Secretaries of the Ministries of Housing and Urban Affairs; Environment, Forest and Climate Change; Jal Shakti; and Panchayati Raj and Rural Development; and the Department of Drinking Water and Sanitation.
    3. Pollution regulator: The Member Secretary of the Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) is the sixth member.
    4. Design logic of the composition: Urban services, environmental standards, water and sanitation, and rural local government are placed in a single body because waste crosses all four jurisdictions.

    Why did the Court fall back on education rather than penalty?

    1. The limit of law: The Bench accepted the reality that law alone could not induce good civic behaviour, and that the change had to come from within.
    2. The instrument chosen: The Court held that an educated child is the most effective and least coercive instrument for educating a parent or a relative.
    3. The tension this creates: Rules, standards and a five Secretary committee are enforceable instruments with fixed accountability, while behavioural change through schoolchildren has no compliance date and no defaulter.
    4. The reversal of the usual direction: Compliance is being routed through the household rather than through the municipal contractor, which shifts the burden to the very generators the Rules had earlier treated as passive.

    What directions did the Court issue?

    1. Curriculum integration: The Department of School and Higher Education must integrate, with immediate effect, both theoretical and practical knowledge on solid waste management.
    2. Students as trainers: Students are to be equipped to train their own family members in waste handling at the household stage.
    3. Teachers as trainers of trainers: Teachers are to be trained so that they can deliver the practical component.
    4. District level engagement: District Collectors must engage with households and educational institutions.
    5. Infrastructure audit: The waste infrastructure needs a complete audit and upgradation to meet the extant standards of the Solid Waste Management Rules, 2026.

    Conclusion

    The Court has reclassified solid waste from a service delivery failure of municipal sanitation into a generation side behavioural failure of 1.4 billion contributors, and has held the passive generator assumption to be constitutionally unethical. Its enforceable directions are the curriculum mandate on the Department of School and Higher Education, the engagement duty on District Collectors and the infrastructure audit against the Solid Waste Management Rules, 2026. The five Secretary committee constituted on 25 May continues to monitor the volume and infrastructure mismatch. The next stage will turn on whether the Department reports a dated curriculum integration plan, since the order carries an immediate effect direction but no separate compliance schedule.

    “[2018, GS3, 10 marks] What are the impediments in disposing the huge quantities of discarded solid wastes which are continuously being generated? How do we remove safely the toxic wastes that have been accumulating in our habitable environment?”

  • Census 2027: rights groups flag gaps in disability categories

    Why in the News

    Disability rights organisations have objected to the nine category disability question proposed for Census 2027, against the 21 specified disabilities recognised in law. The objection turns on a design choice, since the categories printed on the schedule decide which conditions can be counted at all, and a condition without its own box is recorded inside a broader one or not at all.

    What does Census 2027 propose to record on disability?

    1. The nine proposed categories: Seeing, hearing, speech, mobility, intellectual disability, mental illness, disability due to acid attack, disability due to chronic neurological disease, and blood disorder.
    2. What carries over from 2011: Six of the nine, namely seeing, hearing, speech, mobility, intellectual disability and mental illness, are the 2011 Census categories, with “mental retardation” renamed “intellectual disability”.
    3. What is new: Acid attack, chronic neurological disease and blood disorder are the three additions over the 2011 schedule.
    4. Multiple disability recording: The questionnaire allows up to three disabilities to be recorded for one person, entered in the order of severity.

    What are “specified disabilities” under the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016?

    1. The statutory list: The Rights of Persons with Disabilities (RPwD) Act, 2016 recognises 21 specified disabilities in its Schedule, covering physical, intellectual, mental, blood related and multiple disabilities.
    2. The expansion it made: The Act replaced the Persons with Disabilities Act, 1995 and raised the recognised types from seven to 21, treating disability as a dynamic and evolving concept.

    Why do rights groups say the nine categories fall short?

    1. The assurance on record: The Union Minister of State for Social Justice and Empowerment stated in March 2026 that Census 2027 would capture data on all 21 disabilities.
    2. Conditions without a distinct box: Autism spectrum disorder, specific learning disabilities, dwarfism, leprosy cured persons and multiple disabilities including deafblindness are not distinctly placed under any proposed category.
    3. Distinct conditions collapsed into one: Thalassemia, haemophilia and sickle cell disease are reduced to the single category “blood disorder”, which erases the difference between three separate conditions with different prevalence and support needs.
    4. Other statutory conditions absent: Cerebral palsy, muscular dystrophy and multiple sclerosis are recognised in the Act but not separately represented in the proposed schedule.
    5. Scale of the objection: The statement of the National Platform for the Rights of the Disabled (NPRD), citing information from the Politics and Disability Forum, was endorsed by more than 400 signatories.

    What is the Registrar General’s defence of the design?

    1. Broad categories by design: The nine are described as broader categories that include other detailed specific disabilities within them.
    2. Severity ordering retained: The option to record up to three disabilities in order of severity is offered as the mechanism for capturing multiple disability.
    3. Consultation claimed: Categories were finalised after consultation with the Department of Empowerment of Persons with Disabilities, the Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment, and other stakeholders.
    4. Enumerator competence: Field functionaries are not technically qualified to assess or confirm a specific disability, which is the stated reason for keeping categories broad.
    5. Training provided: A three day training covering all aspects of the questionnaire is held for enumerators and supervisors.
    6. Comparison with 2011: The 2027 schedule enumerates a larger number of disabilities than the 2011 schedule did.

    Why does the classification itself decide the count?

    1. The instrument sets the ceiling: An enumerator can only record what the schedule offers, so a condition without a category is absorbed into a broader one and disappears from the published table.
    2. Untrained recognition: Broad categories without a notified training module on which specific disability sits under which head leave the classification to the enumerator’s judgement.
    3. The respondent’s own knowledge: A person who neither communicates nor understands the correct name of their disability cannot correct a wrong entry, which compounds the error.
    4. Self declaration and stigma: Census disability data is self reported, and households under reported disability in earlier rounds because of stigma, which a broad category does nothing to correct.
    5. Downstream consequence: Undercounting a specific group weakens the evidence base for scheme design, budget allocation and reservation entitlements tied to that disability.

    What did the 2011 Census record on disability?

    1. Total count: The 2011 Census counted 2.68 crore persons with disabilities, which was 2.21 percent of the country’s population.
    2. Categories used: The 2011 schedule carried six of the nine categories now proposed.
    3. Concentration of the count: Movement or locomotor, hearing and vision related disabilities together accounted for over half of the country’s population with disabilities.
    4. What the 2011 base implies: A count already limited to six categories in 2011 sets the comparison base against which any 2027 increase will be read.

    Challenges to accurate disability enumeration

    1. Self reporting and stigma: Households conceal disability, particularly mental illness and intellectual disability, to avoid social consequences for marriage and employment. e.g. the 2011 Census figure of 2.21 percent sits well below global disability prevalence estimates of around 15 percent of population.
    2. Untrained enumerators on clinical categories: A three day training cannot equip a field functionary to distinguish autism spectrum disorder from intellectual disability. e.g. specific learning disabilities are invisible without assessment and were absent from the 2011 count entirely.
    3. Severity capping at three: Persons with more than three conditions lose the rest of their profile, which particularly affects multiple disability. e.g. deafblindness combines two sensory disabilities and has no distinct category in the proposed schedule.
    4. No linkage to certification data: Census figures are not reconciled with the Unique Disability ID database, so the two official counts diverge. e.g. UDID certification is issued against the 21 statutory categories while the Census will record nine.
    5. Question placement and time: The disability question sits late in a long household schedule, where fatigue produces default negative answers. e.g. the 2027 self enumeration form is completed by the respondent without any enumerator prompt at all.
    6. Definitional change across rounds: Renaming and regrouping categories between censuses breaks comparability of the time series. e.g. “mental retardation” in 2011 becomes “intellectual disability” in 2027, and three blood conditions are merged into one new head.

    Conclusion

    The dispute is not about whether Census 2027 counts persons with disabilities but about whether its nine category schedule can carry the 21 categories the law recognises. The Registrar General’s position is that the nine are containers holding the specific conditions, and the rights groups’ position is that a container without a notified mapping and enumerator training will not produce disaggregated data. The self enumeration window for snowbound areas is open until 31 August 2026, with the second phase of population enumeration in those areas from 1 to 30 September 2026 and a revisional round from 1 to 5 October 2026. Any change to the disability question must therefore be made before the main enumeration schedule is frozen.

    “[2026] Which of the following statements with regard to the persons with disabilities in India is/are correct?

    1. The Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, an Act passed by the Parliament of India in 2018, mandates reservation in education and employment, places a legal duty on Governments to ensure accessibility and non-discrimination.

    2. The Sugamya Bharat Abhiyan focuses on achieving universal accessibility for Persons with Disabilities across three key domains, built infrastructure, transport systems and information and communication technology.

    3. The National Divyangjan Finance and Development Corporation (NDFDC) is a public sector organisation set up by the Ministry of Corporate Affairs as a not-for-profit company to promote entrepreneurship among Persons with Disabilities (PwDs).

    (a) 1 and 2

    (b) 2 only

    (c) 1 and 3

    (d) 1 only

  • The myth called ‘perfect victim’

    Why in the News

    The Goa Division Bench of the Bombay High Court on 6 August set aside a 2021 trial court judgment and convicted a former magazine editor of raping a former colleague, sentencing him to ten years of rigorous imprisonment. The High Court termed the trial court’s ruling perverse and held that it had fallen for the notion that a sexual assault complainant must be a ‘perfect victim’ and conduct herself in a certain way to appear credible. The ruling sets the evidentiary record against a stereotype of expected victim behaviour that has shaped Indian adjudication for four decades.

    What is the ‘ideal victim’ concept?

    1. Who theorised it: The Norwegian criminologist Nils Christie set out the concept of the ‘ideal victim’ or ‘perfect victim’ in a chapter of the same name in the book From Crime Policy to Victim Policy, published in 1986.
    2. What it claims: Victimhood is not an objective state established by the facts of the offence, it is a status that society grants or denies according to how far the complainant matches an expected profile.
    3. Where it is produced: The idea is propagated by the media, social media, films and the larger society, and race, class and gender determine who is cast as innocent and deserving and who as undeserving of sympathy.
    4. Why it matters in court: Once the profile becomes the test of credibility, a complainant who departs from it has her account doubted regardless of the evidence on record.

    What five attributes did Nils Christie assign to the ‘ideal victim’?

    1. Weakness relative to the offender: The victim is often female, disabled, very young or very old, and is therefore weak in relation to the offender.
    2. Respectability of activity: The victim is engaged in what society treats as respectable activities at the time of the offence.
    3. Blamelessness of location: The victim cannot reasonably be blamed for being where she was during the crime.
    4. No prior acquaintance: The victim does not know the offender personally.
    5. A stereotypically bad offender: The victim is attacked by a perpetrator who is big and bad.
    6. The additional condition: While being weak, the victim must have enough social power to influence sympathy and have her victim status recognised, which is why the poorest complainants are least often believed.

    What is the current status of protection for sexual assault survivors in India?

    1. The governing offence: Rape is defined and punished under Section 63 and Section 64 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, with the minimum sentence set at ten years of rigorous imprisonment.
    2. Consent defined in statute: Consent is defined as an unequivocal voluntary agreement, and the absence of physical resistance does not by itself amount to consent.
    3. Past sexual history excluded: Evidence of a complainant’s general immoral character or previous sexual experience is no longer relevant to the question of consent, following the amendment of the evidence law in 2003 and its retention in the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023.
    4. The presumption on consent: Where sexual intercourse is proved in specified aggravated cases and the woman states she did not consent, the court presumes the absence of consent.
    5. Procedural protections: Trials are held in camera, the survivor’s identity may not be disclosed, and her statement is to be recorded by a woman officer, with a two month outer limit for completing the trial.
    6. The workplace framework: Sexual harassment at the workplace is governed by the Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013, which codified the Vishakha guidelines.
    7. The gap that persists: None of these provisions govern the inferences a judge may draw from a survivor’s demeanour, which is what the Supreme Court’s report of 3 August 2026 addresses.

    Constitutional Provisions Related to Gender Justice and Fair Adjudication

    1. Article 14: Guarantees equality before the law and equal protection of the laws, the basis for challenging a differential standard of credibility applied to women complainants.
    2. Article 15(1): Prohibits discrimination on grounds of sex.
    3. Article 15(3): Permits the State to make special provision for women and children.
    4. Article 21: Guarantees life and personal liberty, read to include the right to live with dignity and bodily integrity.
    5. Article 39(a) and 39(d): Direct the State to secure an equal right to an adequate means of livelihood and equal pay for equal work for men and women.
    6. Article 39A: Directs the State to secure equal justice and free legal aid so that opportunities for securing justice are not denied by economic or other disabilities.
    7. Article 42: Directs the State to make provision for just and humane conditions of work and for maternity relief.
    8. Article 51A(e): Places a fundamental duty on every citizen to renounce practices derogatory to the dignity of women.
    9. Article 141: Makes the law declared by the Supreme Court binding on all courts, the route through which the Vishakha guidelines operated before Parliament legislated.

    How has the ‘ideal victim’ standard shaped Indian judgments?

    1. Mathura, 1979: In the custodial rape case of a teenager, the Sessions Court relied on the survivor’s previous sexual experience to reason that she had likely consented, describing her as habituated to sexual intercourse. The Supreme Court, while acquitting the accused policemen, noted the absence of any alarm or resistance from the survivor and of injuries on her body.
    2. Bhanwari Devi, 1992: In the gang rape of a social worker, the Jaipur District and Sessions Court in 1995 acquitted the accused of gang rape, reasoning that it was unlikely that upper caste men would pollute themselves by having sexual relations with a Dalit woman. Her caste status was what made her an unlikely ‘ideal victim’ in the court’s eyes.
    3. What that case nonetheless produced: The Bhanwari Devi case became the catalyst for the formulation of the Vishakha guidelines and later for the enactment of the Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013.
    4. The Jindal case, 2017: A Punjab and Haryana High Court division bench, in an interim order, suspended the sentences and granted bail to three former law school students convicted of gang raping and blackmailing a classmate, describing the survivor’s behaviour as having a perverse streak.
    5. The reasoning in that order: The bench acknowledged that the allegations of threat and blackmail lent sufficient diabolism to the offence, but read her statement as offering an alternate conclusion of misadventure stemming from a promiscuous attitude and a voyeuristic mind, placing her sexual behaviour at the centre of its assessment.
    6. The trial court in the present case, 2021: The Goa Sessions Court noted several discrepancies in the survivor’s versions, and held that while she had claimed to be in shock and trauma after exiting the lift on 7 November 2013, the closed circuit television footage showed her composed and smiling.
    7. The common thread: Each ruling demanded a performance of trauma from the survivor, and treated any departure from the expected behaviour as a reason to doubt her credibility rather than to examine the evidence.

    Why did the High Court call the trial court’s reasoning perverse?

    1. What the trial court examined: It focused on the complainant’s conduct, her reactions and her personal background rather than on the evidence on record.
    2. What the High Court held about that: It termed the ruling perverse, and identified the specific error as the assumption that a complainant must conduct herself in a certain way to appear credible.
    3. The finding on trauma response: The High Court noted that a survivor has already faced trauma and might feel too ashamed, nervous or confused to respond clearly when questioned repeatedly in an unfamiliar environment.
    4. What that does to the demeanour evidence: Composure on camera minutes after an assault ceases to be evidence of consent once trauma is recognised as producing varied responses.
    5. The outcome: The conviction was recorded and a sentence of ten years of rigorous imprisonment imposed on the former editor for raping a former colleague.

    Why does the ‘ideal offender’ stereotype collapse in this case?

    1. The mirror concept: Christie held that the ‘ideal offender’ must be framed as purely bad, dangerous and a stranger to the victim, so that it becomes easy for society not to like him.
    2. When the frame breaks: Where the offender is a familiar person with a good background story, the ideal dynamic breaks down.
    3. How it broke here: The accused’s social status and his image as a liberal intellectual complicated the stereotype of the ‘ideal offender’.
    4. The consequence for the complainant: On Christie’s argument, when there is no ideal offender to hate, it becomes hard to perceive an ideal victim to sympathise with, so the doubt is transferred to the complainant.
    5. Why this is the core of the item: The two stereotypes operate as a single mechanism, and a complainant’s credibility is set not by her evidence but by how easily society can dislike the man she accuses.
    6. The structural result: This produces a hierarchy of victimisation in which those thought undeserving are perceived as having contributed to the situation and receive less sympathy or none at all.

    How is the judiciary correcting course?

    1. The institutional apology: In 2025, a former Chief Justice of India apologised on behalf of the judiciary for the Supreme Court’s judgment in the Mathura case, calling it a moment of institutional embarrassment.
    2. The report of 3 August 2026: The Supreme Court issued a report recommending greater gender sensitivity in judicial writing.
    3. What it cautions against: It cautions judges against drawing adverse conclusions from delayed reporting, from a lack of physical injuries, from inconsistencies in testimony, or from a survivor’s demeanour.
    4. The reasoning it supplies: It records that trauma affects people differently, which removes the empirical basis for treating a uniform behavioural response as a test of truthfulness.
    5. What the present ruling adds: The Bombay High Court applied that reasoning to set aside a completed acquittal, which converts a recommendation about judicial writing into an operative ground of appeal.

    Major debates surrounding the credibility of sexual assault survivors

    1. Demeanour as evidence: One position treats a complainant’s behaviour after the offence as relevant corroboration, the other holds that trauma responses vary so widely that demeanour carries no evidentiary value.
    2. The sole testimony rule: Indian law permits conviction on the sole testimony of the prosecutrix if found reliable, and the contest is over what makes testimony reliable when there is no medical or electronic corroboration.
    3. Delay in reporting: Delay is read by one line of reasoning as weakening the complaint and by another as the ordinary consequence of shame, dependence and fear of the accused’s social position.
    4. Character evidence in practice: The statutory bar on past sexual history has not removed the use of a complainant’s background and conduct as a proxy, which is precisely the defect the High Court identified here.
    5. Class and caste in the assessment: The Bhanwari Devi ruling turned on the improbability of upper caste men assaulting a Dalit woman, which shows social hierarchy operating as an evidentiary presumption.
    6. Judicial training against judicial discretion: Prescribing what inferences a judge may not draw is defended as necessary correction and resisted as an intrusion on the appreciation of evidence.
    7. The absence of measurement: There is no systematic dataset on how often acquittals turn on demeanour or conduct reasoning, so the scale of the problem is argued from a succession of named cases rather than from evidence.

    Challenges to eliminating victim stereotyping in adjudication

    1. Reasoning migrates to sentencing and bail: Barred from the finding on consent, stereotype reasoning reappears in orders on bail and on suspension of sentence. e.g. the 2017 Punjab and Haryana High Court interim order suspending the sentences of three convicted law students on a reading of the survivor’s promiscuous attitude.
    2. Social hierarchy operating as evidence: Caste and class assumptions are treated as improbability findings rather than as prejudice. e.g. the 1995 Jaipur District and Sessions Court reasoning that upper caste men would not pollute themselves with a Dalit woman.
    3. Electronic evidence read against the survivor: Footage recorded minutes after an assault is used to test a trauma response against an expected script. e.g. the 2021 Goa Sessions Court relying on closed circuit television footage showing the complainant composed and smiling after exiting the lift.
    4. Status of the accused shaping the inquiry: A respected or well connected accused shifts the burden of explanation onto the complainant. e.g. the present case, where the accused’s standing as a magazine editor and liberal intellectual complicated the stereotype of the ideal offender.
    5. Recommendations without binding force: A report on judicial writing does not bind a trial court in the way a statutory provision does. e.g. the Supreme Court’s report of 3 August 2026, whose recommendations reach trial judges only through appellate correction.
    6. Time to correction: Reversal comes at the appellate stage, years after an acquittal. e.g. the 6 August 2026 High Court conviction reversing a trial court ruling of 2021 on an incident of November 2013.
    7. Attrition before trial: Complainants withdraw under social pressure long before any court examines the evidence, so the reported cases understate the problem. e.g. the Mathura case, whose 1979 acquittal produced the nationwide campaign that led to the criminal law amendment of 1983.

    Conclusion

    The ‘ideal victim’ framework explains why Indian courts have repeatedly assessed a complainant’s respectability, caste, prior sexual history and post assault demeanour rather than the evidence on record. The High Court’s reversal on 6 August is the first appellate ruling to name that framework as the reason a trial verdict was perverse, and it applies the Supreme Court’s report of 3 August 2026 on gender sensitivity in judicial writing to an operative outcome. What remains unaddressed is that the correction arrives only on appeal, years after an acquittal, and that a report on judicial writing does not bind a trial court in the way a statutory bar does.

    What is Victimology?

    1. About: Victimology is the systematic study of the victim of a crime, the victim’s relationship with the offender, and the treatment the victim receives from the criminal justice system and from society.
    2. Rationale: It emerged because criminal law is framed as a contest between the State and the accused, which leaves the person actually harmed without a defined position in the proceedings.
    3. Primary victimisation: The harm caused by the offence itself.
    4. Secondary victimisation: The further harm caused by the response of the police, the courts, the media and the community, including hostile cross examination and disbelief.
    5. Victim precipitation: An older strand of the discipline that examined the victim’s own conduct as a contributing factor, now largely discredited in sexual offence contexts for shifting responsibility onto the complainant.
    6. Victim typologies: Classifications of victims by vulnerability and by perceived blameworthiness, of which Christie’s ‘ideal victim’ is the best known.

    Key Concerns Regarding Victimology in India

    1. No statutory standing for the victim: The victim is a witness in the prosecution’s case rather than a party, so the conduct of the trial rests with the State.
    2. Uneven victim compensation: Compensation schemes framed under the criminal procedure law vary widely between States in quantum and in disbursal time.
    3. Secondary victimisation in trial practice: Repeated questioning in an unfamiliar environment and cross examination on conduct reproduce the harm the trial is meant to remedy.
    4. Absence of support services: Trained counsellors, support persons and witness protection are unevenly available across districts.
    5. Blame allocation persists in reasoning: Discredited victim precipitation logic survives in judicial language about conduct, demeanour and lifestyle.
    6. No data on outcomes by victim profile: Conviction rates are not disaggregated by the survivor’s caste, class or relationship to the accused, so disparities cannot be measured.

    Laws and Rules Governing Sexual Offences and Survivor Protection in India

    1. Indian Penal Code, 1860: Defined rape under Section 375 and punished it under Section 376 until its replacement in 2023.
    2. Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 1983: Enacted after the Mathura acquittal, it created the offence of custodial rape and introduced a presumption against consent in specified cases.
    3. Indian Evidence Act, 1872, as amended in 2003: Removed the provision permitting evidence of the prosecutrix’s general immoral character in a rape trial.
    4. Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005: Provides civil remedies including protection, residence and monetary orders.
    5. Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012: Creates gender neutral offences against children with child friendly trial procedures and special courts.
    6. Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 2013: Enacted on the recommendations of the Justice J.S. Verma Committee, it widened the definition of rape and created offences of stalking, voyeurism and acid attack.
    7. Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013: Codified the Vishakha guidelines and requires an Internal Committee in every workplace with ten or more employees.
    8. It also requires a Local Committee at the district level for establishments below that threshold and for the unorganised sector.
    9. Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 2018: Introduced the death penalty for the rape of a girl below twelve years and raised minimum sentences.
    10. Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023: Replaced the Indian Penal Code, 1860, with rape defined in Section 63 and punished in Section 64.
    11. Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023: Replaced the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 and retains the bar on evidence of the complainant’s past sexual history.
    12. Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023: Carries the trial procedure, including in camera proceedings and the recording of the survivor’s statement by a woman officer.

    Key Facts about Gender Justice Jurisprudence in India

    1. Vishakha versus State of Rajasthan, 1997: Laid down binding guidelines on workplace sexual harassment under Article 141, which governed the field for sixteen years until Parliament legislated in 2013.
    2. Tukaram versus State of Maharashtra, 1979: The Mathura acquittal, which triggered an open letter from four law professors and the nationwide campaign leading to the 1983 amendment.
    3. State of Punjab versus Gurmit Singh, 1996: Held that the testimony of a rape survivor is on the same footing as that of an injured witness and needs no corroboration as a rule.
    4. Justice J.S. Verma Committee, 2013: Constituted after the December 2012 Delhi gang rape, it reported within 29 days and its recommendations shaped the Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 2013.
    5. Handbook on Combating Gender Stereotypes, 2023: Issued by the Supreme Court, it lists stereotyped terms used in judgments and supplies the neutral alternatives.
    6. International Day for the Elimination of Violence against Women: Observed on 25 November, marking the start of the sixteen days of activism ending on Human Rights Day.
    7. National Commission for Women: Established under the National Commission for Women Act, 1990 as the statutory body for the review of legal safeguards for women.

    Back2Basics: Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013

    1. What it is: A central statute creating a civil mechanism for the prevention and redressal of sexual harassment of women at the workplace.
    2. Origin: It codified the Vishakha guidelines laid down by the Supreme Court in 1997, which themselves arose from the gang rape of a social worker in Rajasthan in 1992.
    3. Administering ministry: The Ministry of Women and Child Development.
    4. Internal Committee: Mandatory in every workplace employing ten or more persons, headed by a senior woman employee, with at least half its members being women and one member drawn from a non governmental organisation.
    5. Local Committee: Constituted by the District Officer for establishments with fewer than ten employees and for complaints against the employer.
    6. Coverage: It extends to the organised and unorganised sectors, to domestic workers, and to clients, customers and visitors at a workplace.
    7. Timelines: A complaint is to be filed within three months of the incident, the inquiry completed within ninety days, and action taken within sixty days of the report.
    8. Duties on the employer: Providing a safe working environment, displaying the penal consequences of harassment, organising awareness programmes and filing an annual report.

    Way Forward

    1. Convert the report into a practice direction: Issuing the 3 August 2026 recommendations as a binding practice direction under Article 141 would reach trial courts directly rather than through appeal.
    2. Mandatory reasoning standards in acquittals: Requiring a trial court to record why the evidence on record, and not the complainant’s conduct, produced an acquittal would make stereotype reasoning visible on the face of the order.
    3. Gender sensitisation in judicial academies: Sustained modules in State judicial academies for trial judges and public prosecutors, using the Supreme Court’s handbook on gender stereotypes as the syllabus.
    4. Trauma informed examination protocols: Recording the survivor’s evidence through a support person and in a single sitting reduces the repeated questioning the High Court identified as producing confused responses.
    5. Statutory bar on demeanour inference: An express evidentiary provision that a survivor’s demeanour is not relevant to consent would close the gap that the bar on past sexual history left open.
    6. Disaggregated conviction data: Publishing outcomes by the survivor’s caste, class and relationship to the accused would replace argument from named cases with measured disparity.
    7. Strengthen victim support infrastructure: Fully staffed one stop centres, district witness protection under the 2018 scheme, and timely compensation reduce the attrition that removes cases before trial.

    “[2014, GS4, 10 marks] We are witnessing increasing instances of sexual violence against women in the country. Despite existing legal provisions against it, the number of such incidences is on the rise. Suggest some innovative measures to tackle this menace.”

  • Supreme Court orders a time bound eviction framework for Agasthyamalai encroachments

    Why in the News

    The Supreme Court has held that clearing encroachments inside the protected areas of the Agasthyamalai landscape requires a structured, time bound and closely monitored framework. Encroachments have survived decades of directions from the Madras High Court and the top court, so the Court has shifted from ordering eviction to removing the benefits that keep illegal occupation viable. The Court also raised the option of using paramilitary forces to carry out the evictions.

    What is the Central Empowered Committee?

    1. About: The Central Empowered Committee (CEC) is a body that examines forest and wildlife compliance matters and reports its findings and recommendations directly to the Supreme Court.
    2. Mandate in this case: The Court directed it last year to survey the entire Agasthyamalai landscape and identify every non forestry activity running contrary to the Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 and the Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972.
    3. Output: It submitted an interim report carrying division wise findings and recommended a time bound, division wise encroachment eviction plan.

    What did the Central Empowered Committee find on the ground?

    1. Kanyakumari Wildlife Sanctuary: An area of 427.40 hectares stands encroached, with 237.09 hectares caught in litigation. Verified maps of the reserve forest are not available.
    2. Srivilliputhur-Megamalai Tiger Reserve: As per official records of 2020, around 4,595 individuals are encroaching upon 5,071.27 hectares of reserved forest land.
    3. Nature of the occupation: The encroachments there are old, with many holdings under permanent cultivation of silk cotton, cardamom and beans.
    4. Structures inside forest land: A total of 116 government and public utility structures have been constructed inside forest lands without prior approval.
    5. Encroachers on the government payroll: A total of 118 individuals listed as encroachers were identified as serving or retired government employees, including personnel from the Army, the Police, the Forest Department and other State departments.
    6. Kalakad-Mundanthurai Tiger Reserve: The total extent of encroachment is 10.16 hectares by 998 families.

    Why does encroachment in Srivilliputhur-Megamalai carry consequences beyond the forest boundary?

    1. Upper catchment function: The Committee recorded the reserve as one of the most ecologically vulnerable areas because it forms the upper catchment of the Vaigai river.
    2. Downstream dependence: The Vaigai is a critical water source for five downstream districts, so degradation of the catchment transfers the cost to users outside the forest.
    3. Permanent cultivation: Standing plantation crops convert a temporary trespass into a settled land use that resists seasonal eviction.
    4. Enforcement record: Despite clear orders from the Madras High Court to remove encroachments, no significant progress has been made so far.

    What did Tamil Nadu offer in its defence?

    1. Detailed affidavit: The State filed an affidavit listing the steps its authorities had already taken against encroachment.
    2. Resistance on the ground: It acknowledged resistance from encroachers as a live obstacle to eviction drives.
    3. Pending litigation: It cited ongoing court cases that block action on specific parcels.
    4. Social profile of encroachers: It stated that many encroachers were landless and drawn from economically weaker sections.
    5. Law and order risk: The Committee separately recorded that law and order problems arose whenever the Forest Department attempted evictions, making a joint effort necessary.

    Can the difficulty of rehabilitation justify indefinite postponement of eviction?

    1. The Court’s acceptance: The Bench accepted that the complexity of the rehabilitation task is real and cannot be understated.
    2. The limit it set: That complexity cannot serve as a perpetual justification for the indefinite postponement of legally mandated eviction and restoration measures.
    3. What the two positions expose: The State’s constraint is genuine and its cost falls on the forest, so every year of delay converts an unlawful occupation into a settled claim.
    4. The shift in remedy: The Court moved from repeating an eviction order that had failed for decades to withdrawing the entitlements that make continued occupation rational.

    What has the Supreme Court directed?

    1. Action against government servants: Disciplinary and legal action must be initiated against all 118 identified government servants found to be encroachers.
    2. Moratorium on state benefits: A blanket moratorium was sought on the extension of welfare schemes, public utilities, transport facilities, electricity supply and infrastructure support within encroached forest areas, so that illegal occupation is neither incentivised nor legitimised.
    3. Freeze on new activity: A complete prohibition was ordered on the approval or commencement of any new non forestry activity within Agasthyamalai.
    4. A monitored framework: The matter requires a structured, time bound and closely monitored framework rather than periodic directions.
    5. Force option: The Court went as far as to suggest using the paramilitary to evict the encroachers and protect the ecologically sensitive region.

    Why has the political economy of eviction defeated three decades of orders?

    1. Benefits without title: Welfare schemes, electricity and transport reaching encroached parcels signalled state acceptance, which is precisely what the moratorium now targets.
    2. Enforcers as beneficiaries: With 118 serving or retired government employees among the encroachers, including Forest Department personnel, the enforcing agency contained a section of the offenders.
    3. Numbers as leverage: Evicting 4,595 individuals in a single reserve converts a forest law question into a mass displacement question that no district administration will initiate alone.
    4. Electoral exposure: The newly formed coalition government in Tamil Nadu faces two major Dravidian parties in the Opposition that are likely to resist an eviction touching thousands of families.
    5. Restoration burden: Beyond eviction, the State carries the task of resettling and rehabilitating the displaced families and restoring the original forest cover.

    Conclusion

    The Supreme Court has accepted that a repeated eviction order is not a remedy when the State’s own benefit delivery keeps encroachment viable, so it has attacked the incentive rather than only the occupation. The directions now require disciplinary action against 118 government servants, a freeze on welfare and utility extension inside encroached forest, and a prohibition on fresh non forestry activity in Agasthyamalai. The State must now produce a division wise, time bound eviction and restoration plan while simultaneously resettling landless families it has itself described as economically weak. Whether the moratorium survives the political cost of enforcing it is the test the next hearing will apply.

    Protected Area Governance in India

    1. About: A protected area is a legally notified tract managed primarily for the conservation of wildlife and its habitat, with human use restricted by statute rather than by administrative discretion.
    2. Four statutory categories: The Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972 provides for National Parks, Wildlife Sanctuaries, Conservation Reserves and Community Reserves, each with a different level of permitted human activity.
    3. Scale: India’s protected area network covers a little over 5 percent of the country’s geographical area, while recorded forest cover is close to a fifth of it.
    4. Tiger reserves: A tiger reserve is constituted with a core or Critical Tiger Habitat, kept inviolate, and a buffer zone allowing regulated coexistence.
    5. Diversion control: Any use of forest land for a non forest purpose requires prior central approval under the Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980, which is why the 116 unapproved structures in Agasthyamalai are themselves an offence.
    6. Judicial supervision: Forest governance in India has been supervised continuously by the Supreme Court since the 1996 T.N. Godavarman Thirumulpad proceedings, which extended statutory forest protection to all land recorded as forest.

    Laws and Rules Governing Forests and Wildlife in India

    1. Indian Forest Act, 1927: Provides for the constitution of reserved forests, protected forests and village forests, and defines forest offences and their penalties.
    2. Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972: Establishes protected areas, prohibits hunting of scheduled species and regulates trade in wildlife articles.
    3. 2006 amendment: Created the National Tiger Conservation Authority and the statutory concept of Critical Tiger Habitat.
    4. 2022 amendment: Restructured the species schedules and gave effect to India’s obligations under the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES).
    5. Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980: Bars the dereservation of reserved forest and the use of forest land for non forest purposes without prior approval of the Union government.
    6. Van (Sanrakshan Evam Samvardhan) Adhiniyam, 2023: Renamed the 1980 Act and exempted specified categories of land and strategic projects from prior approval.
    7. Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Act, 2006: Recognises individual and community forest rights of forest dwelling Scheduled Tribes and other traditional forest dwellers and provides the only lawful route for settling occupation claims.
    8. Compensatory Afforestation Fund Act, 2016: Governs the use of funds collected as compensatory afforestation and net present value from diverted forest land.
    9. Environment (Protection) Act, 1986: Provides the umbrella power under which eco sensitive zones around protected areas are notified.

    Key Facts about Protected Areas in India

    1. Project Tiger was launched in 1973 and Project Elephant in 1992.
    2. The National Tiger Conservation Authority and the Wildlife Crime Control Bureau are the two central bodies created under the Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972 and its amendments.
    3. Critical Tiger Habitat is notified under Section 38V of the Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972 on the basis of scientific evidence.
    4. The Western Ghats were inscribed as a UNESCO World Heritage Site in 2012 under the natural criteria.
    5. Wildlife Week is observed from 2 to 8 October every year.
    6. India’s biosphere reserves follow the core, buffer and transition zoning of the UNESCO Man and the Biosphere Programme.

    Back2Basics: The Agasthyamalai Landscape

    1. Location: It occupies the southern end of the Western Ghats, straddling the Tamil Nadu and Kerala border, and is named after the Agastyamalai peak.
    2. Designation: The Agasthyamalai Biosphere Reserve was designated in 2001 and was added to the UNESCO World Network of Biosphere Reserves in 2016.
    3. Protected areas on the Tamil Nadu side: Kalakad-Mundanthurai Tiger Reserve, Srivilliputhur-Megamalai Tiger Reserve and Kanyakumari Wildlife Sanctuary.
    4. Protected areas on the Kerala side: Neyyar, Peppara and Shendurney Wildlife Sanctuaries.
    5. Kalakad-Mundanthurai Tiger Reserve: Notified in 1988 as Tamil Nadu’s first tiger reserve, it is often called a river sanctuary for the number of streams rising within it.
    6. Srivilliputhur-Megamalai Tiger Reserve: Notified in 2021 as Tamil Nadu’s fifth tiger reserve, it forms the upper catchment of the Vaigai river.
    7. Species: The landscape holds the endemic lion tailed macaque, the Nilgiri tahr and the Nilgiri langur, alongside tiger and elephant populations.
    8. Communities: The Kani tribal community lives in the landscape and is associated with the traditional knowledge of the Arogyapacha plant.

    Challenges in Protected Area Management in India

    1. Encroachment and regularisation pressure: Long standing occupation acquires political protection and becomes practically irreversible. e.g. the 427.40 hectares encroached in Kanyakumari Wildlife Sanctuary, of which 237.09 hectares sit in litigation.
    2. Unauthorised construction inside forest land: Public agencies themselves build without the prior approval the Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 requires. e.g. the 116 government and public utility structures recorded inside Agasthyamalai forest land.
    3. Linear infrastructure fragmentation: Roads and railway lines cut habitat into blocks and raise animal mortality. e.g. animal deaths on the national highway running through Kaziranga National Park during the annual Brahmaputra floods.
    4. Human wildlife conflict: Crop and life losses on the periphery erode local support for strict protection. e.g. repeated elephant deaths on the Madukkarai railway stretch near Coimbatore.
    5. Rights settlement conflicting with eviction: Claims under the Forest Rights Act, 2006 and eviction drives run on separate tracks with no sequencing. e.g. the Supreme Court’s February 2019 order in Wildlife First v Union of India directing eviction of rejected claimants, which was stayed within weeks.
    6. Invasive species: Alien plants suppress native fodder and degrade grazing habitat. e.g. the spread of Lantana camara and Senna spectabilis across Bandipur and Wayanad.
    7. Frontline capacity deficit: Vacancies and weak equipment leave beat level protection thin. e.g. the Forest Department in Agasthyamalai being unable to conduct evictions without a joint force because of law and order risk.

    Way Forward

    1. Division wise time bound plan: Adopt the Committee’s recommendation of a division wise eviction schedule with named officers, fixed dates and monthly reporting to the Court.
    2. Sequence rights settlement before eviction: Complete the disposal of individual and community claims under the Forest Rights Act, 2006 in each division first, so eviction proceeds only against occupation that has no legal basis.
    3. Rehabilitation package before displacement: Notify a resettlement package with alternative land, housing and livelihood support before any eviction of landless families, on the pattern of the voluntary village relocation model used in tiger reserves.
    4. Departmental accountability: Complete disciplinary proceedings against the 118 serving and retired government employees within a fixed period and publish the outcome.
    5. Verified cadastral mapping: Prepare and publish verified maps of the reserve forest boundaries of Kanyakumari Wildlife Sanctuary using satellite imagery, since the absence of maps is itself an enabler of encroachment.
    6. Utility linkage audit: Audit every electricity connection, road and welfare scheme extended into forest parcels and terminate those inside notified boundaries.
    7. Catchment restoration: Fund assisted natural regeneration of the vacated Vaigai upper catchment through the Compensatory Afforestation Fund, with downstream district water users as monitored stakeholders.

    “[2020] Among the following Tiger Reserves, which one has the largest area under “Critical Tiger Habitat”?

    (a) Corbett

    (b) Ranthambore

    (c) Nagarjunsagar-Srisailam

    (d) Sunderbans

  • Due diligence: curbs on surrogate advertising must avoid regulatory overreach

    Why in the News

    The Maharashtra Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Commissioner has begun summoning celebrity endorsers of a pan masala brand, treating the endorsement as a surrogate promotion of tobacco. The action moves enforcement from the manufacturer to the person who supplies the brand recall, and it tests whether the state can discharge the burden of proof that the courts have already placed on it.

    What is surrogate advertising?

    1. Definition: Surrogate advertising is the promotion of a banned product through a legally saleable substitute that carries the same brand name, packaging and visual identity.
    2. How it operates: A tobacco or liquor manufacturer registers an extension product such as elaichi, soda or music CDs, then advertises that extension so the parent brand stays visible where direct advertising is prohibited.
    3. The legal test: An advertisement becomes surrogate when the substitute product has no market identity independent of its association with the prohibited product.
    4. The case at hand: The FDA holds that the pan masala brand endorsed by three leading film actors has no identity independent of tobacco, so endorsing it amounts to endorsing tobacco.

    What is endorser liability?

    1. Meaning: Endorser liability is the statutory responsibility placed on a celebrity or influencer for a false or misleading claim made in an advertisement they lend their name to.
    2. Source of the duty: The Consumer Protection Act, 2019 created this liability along with monetary penalties, which removes ignorance of the manufacturer’s intent as a defence.

    Why has enforcement shifted from the manufacturer to the endorser?

    1. The asymmetry named: The person carrying the persuasive power bears almost none of the health or economic cost of the product being consumed.
    2. Where the cost lands: The consumer absorbs that cost, and an underfunded public health system absorbs the treatment burden that follows.
    3. Why the manufacturer route stalls: Brand extension is legal on its face, so acting only against the manufacturer leaves the advertisement itself untouched.
    4. Why the endorser route bites: Requiring endorsers to explain their decision making applies the endorser liability principle at the enforcement stage rather than only after a complaint.
    5. The wider field: The same asymmetry runs through advertisements making unsubstantiated health claims such as “boosts immunity”, and through educational and financial products.

    What must the state prove before it can call an advertisement surrogate?

    1. The governing ruling: The Delhi High Court in DGHS vs Som Pan Product Pvt. Ltd. (2024) held that the state carries the responsibility of proving a case of surrogate advertising.
    2. Brand registration is not proof: The mere registration of an extension brand does not by itself establish that the advertisement is surrogate.
    3. Legality is not a shield either: The existence of a technically legal product does not automatically permit the particular advertisement built around it.
    4. What follows for the FDA: Suspicion must be converted into inquiries under the Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products Act (COTPA), 2003 and its Rules and under the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006 that survive judicial scrutiny.

    Why does the existing regulatory regime struggle with such advertisements?

    1. Fragmentation: Regulation is scattered across a series of Acts and Rules with no single authority owning the surrogate advertising question end to end.
    2. Forum shopping: Advertisers use the multiplicity of legal and administrative instruments to draw the judiciary into the dispute and stall enforcement.
    3. Definitional gap: No statute defines the threshold at which an extension product’s independent market identity becomes real rather than nominal.
    4. Health stakes: India carries the world’s largest burden of oral cancer, which is what makes treatment of these advertisements as unfair trade practices a consumer health question rather than a marketing dispute.

    Does tougher enforcement strengthen the rule or invite regulatory overreach?

    1. The case for acting: Penalties or prohibitions in this case would materially narrow the space that surrogate advertising currently exploits.
    2. The case for restraint: An action that fails the evidentiary standard set in 2024 becomes a precedent that advertisers cite in every later proceeding.
    3. The self defeating outcome: Enforcement seen as arbitrary strengthens the very practice it was meant to end, by converting a public health question into a dispute about administrative excess.
    4. The distinction that matters: Targeting the marketing chain is legitimate, targeting individuals without completing the statutory inquiry is not.

    Challenges to regulating surrogate advertising

    1. Proving the negative: The state must establish that a lawfully sold product has no independent market, which requires sales and distribution evidence that regulators rarely collect. e.g. brand extensions in elaichi and mouth freshener categories report genuine retail sales, which manufacturers cite as proof of independent identity.
    2. Split jurisdiction: Tobacco control sits with the health administration, food safety with the FDA and unfair trade practices with consumer authorities, so no single body carries the case through. e.g. the present action begins with a state FDA whose primary statute is the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006, not COTPA.
    3. Digital advertising escapes the frame: Influencer posts and platform advertisements are transient and geo targeted, so they leave little evidence for a later inquiry. e.g. short video endorsements of betting and fantasy gaming platforms circulate widely without the disclosure labels print and television carry.
    4. Weak deterrence in practice: Penalties are small relative to advertising budgets and are contested for years. e.g. tobacco control prosecutions under COTPA are typically compounded at low fines rather than pursued to conviction.
    5. Sponsorship and event routes: Prohibited categories reach audiences through sports and cultural sponsorship where the brand appears without any product claim. e.g. surrogate liquor branding through music, soda and sporting event sponsorship has continued despite the advertising prohibition.
    6. Enforcement capacity: State drug and food administrations are staffed for sampling and licensing work, not for evidentiary media investigations. e.g. food safety officer vacancies in several States leave routine sampling targets unmet, before any advertising inquiry is added.

    Conclusion

    The action against celebrity endorsers is a defensible extension of endorser liability into the enforcement stage, and it addresses a real asymmetry between who persuades and who pays the health cost. Its survival depends entirely on whether the inquiry under COTPA, 2003 and the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006 meets the evidentiary standard the Delhi High Court fixed in 2024. A well grounded order would narrow the space for surrogate advertising across tobacco, health claims, education and finance. An unsupported one would leave the practice stronger than it found it.

    Advertising Regulation in India

    1. What it covers: Advertising regulation governs the content, placement and truthfulness of commercial communication, and reaches the advertiser, the agency, the publisher and the endorser.
    2. Mixed model: India uses statutory control for specific product categories alongside self regulation by the Advertising Standards Council of India (ASCI), a voluntary industry body whose code is not itself law.
    3. Statutory anchor since 2019: The Central Consumer Protection Authority (CCPA), constituted under the Consumer Protection Act, 2019, can order the discontinuation of a misleading advertisement and impose penalties on the advertiser and the endorser.
    4. Prohibited categories: Direct advertising of tobacco products is banned, and liquor advertising is restricted, which is precisely what creates the incentive for brand extension.
    5. Scale: India is among the world’s largest advertising markets by volume of impressions, with digital and influencer marketing now the fastest growing segment and the least documented.

    Laws and Rules Governing Advertising and Surrogate Promotion

    1. Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products Act (COTPA), 2003: Prohibits direct and indirect advertisement, promotion and sponsorship of tobacco products and regulates sale to and around minors.
    2. Section 5: Bars advertisement of cigarettes and other tobacco products, including indirect advertisement, which is the provision surrogate advertising is tested against.
    3. Consumer Protection Act, 2019: Defines misleading advertisement, creates the CCPA, and imposes liability and penalties on manufacturers and endorsers.
    4. Endorser penalty: Provides monetary penalty on an endorser for a false or misleading advertisement, with a prohibition on further endorsements for a stated period on repetition.
    5. Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006: Regulates food product claims and advertising, and prohibits misleading claims about the nature, quality or health effect of a food.
    6. Cable Television Networks (Regulation) Act, 1995: Bars advertisement of prohibited products on cable television through the Advertisement Code framed under it.
    7. Drugs and Magic Remedies (Objectionable Advertisements) Act, 1954: Prohibits advertisements claiming cure for listed diseases and conditions.
    8. Central Consumer Protection Authority (Prevention of Misleading Advertisements and Endorsements) Guidelines, 2022: Set conditions for a non misleading advertisement, regulate bait and surrogate advertisements, and fix due diligence duties for endorsers.
    9. Endorsement Know hows for digital advertising, 2023: Require celebrities, influencers and virtual influencers to disclose a material connection with the advertiser in a clear and prominent manner.

    Government Initiatives in Advertising and Consumer Protection

    1. National Tobacco Control Programme (NTCP): Implemented by the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare to enforce COTPA, run awareness campaigns and support cessation, targeted at tobacco users and youth.
    2. National Tobacco Quitline and mCessation: Provide telephone and mobile based cessation support to tobacco users seeking to quit.
    3. Jago Grahak Jago: Consumer awareness campaign of the Department of Consumer Affairs, aimed at informing consumers about misleading advertisements and grievance routes.
    4. National Consumer Helpline and the INGRAM portal: Give consumers a single point to lodge complaints against misleading advertisements and unfair trade practices.
    5. Eat Right India: Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) campaign to curb misleading food claims and promote safe and healthy food, aimed at consumers and food businesses.

    Key Facts about Tobacco Control and Advertising Regulation

    1. World No Tobacco Day is observed on 31 May each year.
    2. India has the world’s largest burden of oral cancer, which is the health basis for the strict treatment of tobacco surrogate advertising.
    3. India is a party to the World Health Organization Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO FCTC), the first international public health treaty, which India ratified in 2004.
    4. Pictorial health warnings must cover 85 percent of the principal display area on both sides of a tobacco product package in India, among the largest such requirements globally.
    5. The Advertising Standards Council of India (ASCI) was set up in 1985 as a voluntary self regulatory body and its code has no statutory force of its own.

    Challenges in Advertising and Consumer Protection Regulation

    1. Self regulation without teeth: ASCI rulings bind only members and carry no penalty, so a non member advertiser faces no consequence. e.g. several offshore betting and crypto platforms advertising into India are outside ASCI’s membership entirely.
    2. Influencer economy outpaces disclosure rules: Paid endorsements are presented as personal opinion, and disclosure labels are omitted or hidden. e.g. financial influencers recommending securities without registration led the Securities and Exchange Board of India to restrict regulated entities from associating with unregistered advice givers.
    3. Dark patterns in digital interfaces: Design choices such as false urgency and forced action steer consumers without any express claim to test. e.g. the Department of Consumer Affairs notified guidelines in 2023 listing thirteen specified dark patterns on e commerce platforms.
    4. Regulatory capacity gap: The CCPA and State food and drug administrations have small investigation teams against a very large advertising volume. e.g. misleading claims in the coaching and edtech sector produced a separate CCPA advisory only after repeated complaints.
    5. Cross border advertising: Advertisements served from outside India for products banned within India are hard to reach through domestic statutes. e.g. offshore betting platforms advertise through surrogate news and sports content channels aimed at Indian audiences.
    6. Health claims without evidence: Immunity, weight loss and fortification claims sit between food law and drug law and are contested at the margin. e.g. claims on health supplements and nutraceuticals repeatedly draw FSSAI action for lacking substantiation.

    Back2Basics: Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI)

    1. Governing Act: Established under the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006.
    2. Year established: Constituted in 2008, with the Act’s substantive provisions brought into force from 2011.
    3. Parent ministry: Functions under the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare.
    4. Mandate: Lays down science based standards for articles of food and regulates their manufacture, storage, distribution, sale, import and advertising.
    5. Composition: Headed by a Chairperson of the rank of Secretary to the Government of India, with a Chief Executive Officer and members drawn from States, industry, consumer groups and food technology.
    6. Enforcement structure: Implemented on the ground by State Food Safety Commissioners, Designated Officers and Food Safety Officers, which is why a State FDA leads the present action.

    Way Forward

    1. Complete the statutory inquiry: Convert the summons into a documented proceeding under COTPA, 2003 and the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006 that records evidence of the extension product’s dependent market identity.
    2. Define independent market identity: Notify an objective test combining sales volume, distribution reach and advertising spend of the extension product relative to the parent brand.
    3. Single window coordination: Create a joint mechanism between the CCPA, the health administration and State food and drug administrations so one authority carries a surrogate advertising case to conclusion.
    4. Raise the penalty to advertising spend: Link penalties to the advertising outlay of the campaign so the fine is not absorbed as a cost of business.
    5. Mandatory pre certification for prohibited categories: Require prior vetting of advertisements for brand names shared with tobacco and liquor products before release.
    6. Extend disclosure enforcement to digital: Audit influencer endorsements for the material connection disclosure and publish enforcement outcomes so the rule becomes visible.
    7. Consumer side remedy: Publicise the CCPA and National Consumer Helpline routes so complaints against misleading endorsements do not depend on regulator initiative alone.

    “[2014, GS2, 12.5 marks] The setting up of a Rail Tariff Authority to regulate fares will subject the cash strapped Indian Railways to demand subsidy for obligation to operate non-profitable routes and services. Taking into account the experience in the power sector, discuss if the proposed reform is expected to benefit the consumers, the Indian Railways or the private container operators.”

  • SEBI’s Closing Auction Session: Better Price Discovery, and the First Manipulation Case

    Why in the News

    The Closing Auction Session (CAS), introduced by the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) on 3 August 2026 to replace the average based method of fixing stock market closing prices, has raised mutual fund participation from 5% to 7% earlier to 25%. Within ten days of launch the regulator imposed a Rs 3.7 crore penalty on two entities for manipulating the same window, which exposes the trade off at the centre of the reform, that concentrating price discovery into a single transparent auction also concentrates the target for manipulation.

    How does the Closing Auction Session work?

    1. A fixed auction window: CAS is an official 20 minute auction held between 3:15 p.m. and 3:35 p.m., during which the exchange collects buy and sell orders from participants instead of executing continuous trades.
    2. A blind auction: Participants cannot see the full order book during the window, which prevents an order placed at the last instant from being priced against a visible book.
    3. Matching at the equilibrium price: At the end of the window all orders are matched at a single equilibrium price, defined as the price at which the maximum number of shares can be traded.
    4. Deferred execution: In contrast to continuous trading, where bids and offers match instantly, an auction can only result in a trade after the exchange ends it, which allows more time for supply and demand to find a new equilibrium.

    What is the Volume Weighted Average Price?

    1. An average of executed trades: The Volume Weighted Average Price (VWAP) is the average price of trades executed over a defined period, weighted by the quantity traded at each price, and it was the basis on which exchanges earlier fixed the closing price from the last 30 minutes of continuous trading.
    2. Why an average is vulnerable: Because it averages trades that have already happened, a few large trades placed at the end of the period can pull the average disproportionately without any change in the underlying supply and demand.

    What is order imbalance?

    1. The gap between buy and sell interest: Order imbalance is the gap between cumulative buy quantity and cumulative sell quantity at different price levels within the auction, and a low imbalance indicates that the discovered price represents a more stable consensus.

    What is tracking error?

    1. Deviation of a fund from its benchmark: Tracking error is the extent to which an index fund's or exchange traded fund's return diverges from the return of the index it is meant to replicate, and it widens when the closing price used to value the fund differs from the price at which the index is computed.

    Why did SEBI replace the VWAP based closing price?

    1. The closing price is a reference, not a number: The closing price of a security is used for portfolio valuation, index computation, derivative settlement, mutual fund net asset value calculation and institutional investment decisions, so it must reflect the expectations of both buyers and sellers.
    2. The old method's weakness: Exchanges determined the closing price largely through the VWAP of trades in the last 30 minutes of continuous trading, and a few large last minute trades could disproportionately affect the final average, creating the possibility of price distortion.
    3. When distortion was worst: The vulnerability was concentrated on large event days, specifically index rebalancing days and derivative expiry days, when order flow is heavily one sided.
    4. The measured evidence: For NIFTY 50 stocks, volatility in the last half hour exceeded the volatility observed between 09:15 and 14:30 by 1.8 times on MSCI index rebalancing days and by 1.5 times on FTSE index rebalancing days in 2024.
    5. The conceptual shift: CAS converts closing price determination from passive averaging of past trades into dynamic demand and supply discovery, and reduces price noise while improving the information efficiency of Indian equity markets.
    6. The regulatory gain: The SEBI Chairperson stated that CAS provides the regulator with greater capability to identify manipulation than the earlier VWAP based system.

    What does the spread of closing auctions across major exchanges establish about the model?

    1. The peer group: With this move the National Stock Exchange and the Bombay Stock Exchange have joined NASDAQ, the New York Stock Exchange, the London Stock Exchange, Euronext, the Hong Kong Stock Exchange, Singapore Exchange, the Tokyo Stock Exchange and the Australian Securities Exchange, all of which fix closing prices by auction.
    2. United States, NASDAQ Closing Cross: A single price auction at the close that publishes indicative closing prices and order imbalance information in the minutes before the cross, so that participants can supply liquidity against a visible imbalance.
    3. United States, New York Stock Exchange Closing Auction: Designated Market Makers publish imbalance information before the close and are obliged to offset residual imbalance, which places an accountable intermediary inside the auction.
    4. United Kingdom, London Stock Exchange: A closing auction with a randomised end to the uncrossing phase, so that no participant can time an order to the exact final instant.
    5. Hong Kong Stock Exchange: Reintroduced its Closing Auction Session in 2016 with price limits and a random closing period, after an earlier version launched in 2008 was suspended in 2009 following manipulation concerns, which is the closest precedent for India's present position.
    6. Japan, Tokyo Stock Exchange: Uses the Itayose single price call auction method to determine the closing price, matching all eligible orders at one price.
    7. Australian Securities Exchange: Runs a single price closing auction with a randomised start, again to defeat last instant order timing.
    8. What the set demonstrates: Closing auctions were initially adopted to achieve efficient price discovery and have since become a liquidity event in their own right, with the volume share of closing auctions increasing across both Europe and America.

    Who gains from a cleaner closing price?

    1. Passive funds first: India's passive funds, which have expanded from a relatively small base to a multi crore asset base driven by exchange traded funds and index funds, are likely to be the biggest beneficiaries initially, because they depend on accurate closing prices to replicate benchmarks.
    2. Mutual funds have already moved: The SEBI Chairperson stated that mutual funds' participation rate in CAS has risen sharply to 25%, compared with 5% to 7% earlier.
    3. Large orders execute without leaking information: The auction allows large investors to participate anonymously and execute at a commonly discovered price, which reduces information leakage and the price impact that usually accompanies large orders placed close to market closing time.
    4. Foreign institutional capital: Foreign investors managing billions of dollars prefer markets with predictable closing mechanisms, so aligning India with international practice can improve institutional inflows into Indian equities.
    5. Better execution technology: Execution algorithms that analyse order imbalance, liquidity patterns and equilibrium prices push Indian markets toward institutional quality trading practices.
    6. A stronger valuation benchmark: A well functioning CAS makes the closing price a stronger valuation benchmark by incorporating the bid spread, order imbalance, liquidity and investor conviction, rather than only executed trade prices.

    Does concentrating price discovery into one window reduce manipulation or relocate it?

    1. The case that it reduces manipulation: Matching at a single equilibrium price with a blind order book removes the ability of a few late trades to pull an average, and the regulator gains a complete record of every order placed and cancelled inside the window.
    2. The case that it relocates manipulation: Concentrating the entire closing price determination into 20 minutes creates one high value target, and the first enforcement action arrived within ten days of launch.
    3. The evidence for the second reading: The alleged manipulation involved placing very large orders and cancelling them within seconds, a technique that works precisely because the auction aggregates orders before matching them.
    4. What actually changed: The manipulation did not disappear, it became visible, since the regulator could identify the pattern from the order and cancellation record in a way the VWAP system did not permit.
    5. The unresolved part: Detection after the event does not prevent the closing price on that day from being distorted, and the closing price then flows into index computation, net asset values and derivative settlement before the enforcement order is issued.

    What did SEBI's first CAS manipulation order find?

    1. The penalty and the entities: SEBI imposed a penalty of Rs 3.7 crore on Copthall Mauritius Investment Ltd. and Mansi Share and Stock Broking Private Ltd. and barred them from the market for allegedly manipulating trades during the CAS.
    2. The date and the context: The alleged violations occurred on 13 August 2026, the day on which weekly derivative contracts linked to the Sensex expired.
    3. The reference price rule: SEBI fixes the maximum permitted deviation from the reference price at 3% within the CAS.
    4. The buy side conduct: One entity placed large buy orders constituting at least 85% of all buy orders made in the minutes before the Sensex closed, all of them above the 3% deviation mark, and simultaneously cancelled its latest buy order.
    5. The sell side conduct: The other entity placed large sell orders across eight Sensex constituents totalling about 12.65 lakh shares, of which more than seven lakh shares were placed 2.5% below the reference price and 4.6 lakh shares below 1%, and cancelled them within four to five seconds.
    6. The alleged effect: The manipulation led to three price spikes.
    7. The alleged motive: SEBI's preliminary findings state that placing and then cancelling these large buy and sell orders allowed the noticees to avoid losses or wrongfully profit from positions in derivative trades that would otherwise have expired worthless.
    8. The stage of proceedings: The noticees have been given 21 days to respond to the interim order.
    9. The regulator's stated posture: The SEBI Chairperson stated that anyone manipulating the CAS would face strict and immediate action, that CAS exists for transparency, and that those who think they can manipulate CAS in order to discredit it are mistaken.

    Challenges to the Closing Auction Session

    1. Cash and derivative markets close at different times: Cash market closing prices are set through CAS while equity derivatives continue trading beyond the window, creating a temporary gap between spot and futures prices. e.g. on Sensex weekly expiry days the mismatch is largest, and it was on the 13 August 2026 expiry that the first manipulation case arose.
    2. Arbitrage strategies lose their reference: Arbitrage traders who price the spot against the future cannot do so cleanly when one leg is settled by auction and the other by continuous trading. e.g. cash and carry arbitrage positions built on a VWAP close now carry an unhedged residual through the auction window.
    3. Algorithmic and institutional models were built on the old mechanism: Institutional traders and algorithmic firms must rebuild strategies that assumed a VWAP based close, factoring in auction imbalances, indicative prices and real time order flow. e.g. SEBI itself stated that the problem is a lack of understanding, because algorithms and other players historically based their models on the old mechanism.
    4. Index levels jumped across the auction in early sessions: Participants raised concerns over the sharp difference between index levels recorded before CAS and after the auction on the first two trading days, though SEBI ruled out foul play. e.g. this gap appeared immediately after the 3 August 2026 launch, before participation had stabilised.
    5. Illiquid securities cannot generate a representative price: The efficiency of CAS depends on sufficient order participation, and in less liquid securities limited buy and sell orders may produce a closing price that does not represent broader market sentiment. e.g. this is why the mechanism was launched only for stocks with futures and options contracts rather than the whole cash market.
    6. Retail investors do not recognise the new closing price: For many retail investors the closing price has traditionally meant the last traded price or a VWAP figure, so intraday traders and derivative participants may find the auction price confusing. e.g. an investor comparing a broker application's last traded price with the official closing price on the same screen sees two different numbers.
    7. Order cancellation is a manipulation channel the auction structure enables: Large orders placed to shift the indicative equilibrium and then withdrawn before matching are the classic auction manipulation technique. e.g. the 13 August 2026 case involved sell orders cancelled within four to five seconds of being placed.
    8. The 3% deviation band can itself be gamed: A cap on deviation from the reference price becomes a target that orders cluster against rather than a limit they respect. e.g. all of the buy orders in the first enforcement case were placed above the 3% deviation mark.
    9. Derivative expiry concentration magnifies the stake: Restricting the number of weekly expiries per exchange concentrated open interest into fewer expiry days, so the value riding on a single closing price rose. e.g. the alleged manipulation was targeted at derivative positions that would otherwise have expired worthless.
    10. Enforcement is after the fact: An interim order issued days later cannot restore a distorted closing price that has already flowed into net asset values, index levels and settlement. e.g. the Rs 3.7 crore order came with a 21 day response window, long after the 13 August settlement had been completed.

    Conclusion

    CAS replaces a passively computed average with an actively discovered equilibrium, and on the evidence of the first three weeks it is working as intended, with mutual fund participation quadrupling and the regulator able to reconstruct manipulation from the order record in a way the VWAP system did not allow. What the first enforcement case shows is that the reform relocates manipulation rather than eliminating it, moving it from a diffuse 30 minute average into a concentrated 20 minute auction where it is more consequential but also more visible. The correct test of the mechanism is not the volatility of its first fortnight but measurable improvement in market quality, specifically lower tracking errors, reduced closing price variance, narrower spreads, improved liquidity and stronger price efficiency.

    India's Securities Market

    1. What it is: The securities market is the set of institutions through which companies and governments raise capital by issuing securities and through which those securities are subsequently traded, valued and settled.
    2. Two segments: The primary market handles fresh issuance through public offers and private placements, while the secondary market handles trading of already issued securities on exchanges.
    3. Regulatory architecture: SEBI regulates the securities market, the RBI regulates the government securities and money markets, and the Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India and the Pension Fund Regulatory and Development Authority regulate the institutional investors that participate in it.
    4. Two national exchanges: The Bombay Stock Exchange, established in 1875, is Asia's oldest stock exchange, and the National Stock Exchange, which began operations in 1994, introduced screen based nationwide electronic trading.
    5. Global standing in derivatives: India accounts for a very large share of equity option contracts traded globally, and the National Stock Exchange has ranked as the world's largest derivatives exchange by number of contracts traded for several consecutive years.
    6. Dematerialised holding: Securities are held in electronic form through two depositories, the National Securities Depository Limited and the Central Depository Services Limited, established under the Depositories Act, 1996.
    7. Settlement cycle: India moved to a T plus 1 settlement cycle for all listed equities by January 2023, becoming one of the first large markets to do so, and has since introduced an optional same day settlement segment.
    8. Rising retail and passive participation: Growth in demat account openings, systematic investment plans and index linked products has made passive funds a structurally important source of demand, which is why the accuracy of the closing price now carries system wide consequences.
    9. Investor protection funds: Exchanges maintain Investor Protection Funds and SEBI operates an Investor Protection and Education Fund funded partly from disgorged amounts and penalties.

    Laws and Rules Governing India's Securities Market

    1. Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992: Constitutes SEBI as a statutory body and gives it the powers to protect investor interests, promote market development and regulate the securities market.
    2. Section 11 confers the general power to regulate, and Section 11B the power to issue directions, including the interim orders under which market access is barred.
    3. Section 15HA provides the penalty for fraudulent and unfair trade practices, and Section 15J sets the factors for determining the quantum of penalty.
    4. Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1956: Governs the recognition and regulation of stock exchanges, the definition of securities and the listing of securities.
    5. Securities Contracts (Regulation) Rules, 1957: Prescribe minimum public shareholding requirements and the conditions for continued listing.
    6. Depositories Act, 1996: Provides for the dematerialisation of securities and the constitution and regulation of depositories and depository participants.
    7. Companies Act, 2013: Governs public issues, prospectus disclosure, related party transactions and corporate governance obligations of listed companies.
    8. SEBI (Prohibition of Fraudulent and Unfair Trade Practices relating to Securities Market) Regulations, 2003: Prohibit manipulative and deceptive devices, including placing orders with no intention of executing them, which is the provision under which order and cancellation manipulation is pursued.
    9. SEBI (Prohibition of Insider Trading) Regulations, 2015: Prohibit trading on unpublished price sensitive information and require listed companies to maintain structured digital databases of such information.
    10. SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015: Fix continuous disclosure, board composition and related party approval requirements for listed entities.
    11. SEBI (Substantial Acquisition of Shares and Takeovers) Regulations, 2011: Govern open offers on acquisition of control or of specified shareholding thresholds.
    12. SEBI (Intermediaries) Regulations, 2008: Govern registration and conduct of brokers, merchant bankers and other intermediaries, under which broking entities are proceeded against.
    13. Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002: Applies know your customer and beneficial ownership obligations to market intermediaries and foreign portfolio investors.

    Key Facts about SEBI and India's Exchanges

    1. CAS was launched on 3 August 2026, initially for stocks having futures and options contracts, and runs from 3:15 p.m. to 3:35 p.m.
    2. SEBI fixes the maximum deviation from the reference price within the CAS at 3%.
    3. Mutual fund participation in CAS rose to 25% from 5% to 7% earlier within the first weeks of operation.
    4. SEBI released its study on retail and non retail participation in the derivatives market for 2025-26 on 20 August 2026.
    5. An earlier SEBI study flagged that over 90% of trades by retail investors in the derivatives segment resulted in losses.
    6. SEBI's measures to curb excessive derivatives volatility include increasing lot sizes and limiting the number of expiries per exchange, while the Union Budget raised the Securities Transaction Tax on the segment.
    7. SEBI was established as a non statutory body in April 1988 and given statutory status by the SEBI Act, 1992 with effect from 30 January 1992.
    8. SEBI's headquarters is at the Bandra Kurla Complex in Mumbai, with regional offices in New Delhi, Kolkata, Chennai and Ahmedabad.
    9. Appeals against SEBI orders lie to the Securities Appellate Tribunal, and from there to the Supreme Court on a question of law.
    10. National Investors' Day, marking investor awareness, and the Investor Protection and Education Fund are both instruments through which SEBI discharges its investor protection mandate.

    Back2Basics: Securities and Exchange Board of India

    1. Governing Act: Constituted under the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992.
    2. Year established: Set up as an administrative body in April 1988 and given statutory powers with effect from 30 January 1992.
    3. Administrative ministry: Functions under the Department of Economic Affairs, Ministry of Finance.
    4. Threefold mandate: To protect the interests of investors in securities, to promote the development of the securities market, and to regulate the securities market.
    5. Composition: A Chairperson, two members from among officials of the Union Ministries dealing with finance and law, one member from the RBI, and five other members appointed by the Union Government, of whom at least three are whole time members.
    6. Appointment: The Chairperson and members are appointed by the Union Government, and the Chairperson can be removed only on the grounds specified in the Act.
    7. Jurisdiction: Covers stock exchanges, depositories, brokers, merchant bankers, mutual funds, foreign portfolio investors, credit rating agencies, listed companies and investment advisers.
    8. Quasi legislative power: Frames regulations binding on all market participants without requiring prior parliamentary approval, subject to laying before Parliament.
    9. Quasi judicial power: Conducts inquiries, passes interim and final orders, imposes monetary penalties, bars entities from the market and orders disgorgement of unlawful gains.
    10. Quasi executive power: Investigates, conducts search and seizure with the approval of a designated court, and calls for records from any person associated with the securities market.
    11. Appellate route: Its orders are appealable to the Securities Appellate Tribunal, a statutory tribunal constituted under the same Act.

    Challenges in India's Securities Market

    1. Retail losses concentrated in derivatives: Retail participation has grown fastest in the segment where retail outcomes are worst. e.g. a SEBI study found that over 90% of trades by retail investors in the futures and options segment led to losses.
    2. Speed advantage of co-located algorithmic trading: Firms with exchange co-located servers execute in fractions of the time available to other participants, raising questions of unequal access. e.g. the National Stock Exchange co-location matter, in which SEBI passed disgorgement orders, ran for years before resolution.
    3. Manipulation in small and mid cap counters: Thin float and low liquidity make price manipulation cheap in smaller listed companies. e.g. SEBI's action against Dhenu Buildcon Infra Ltd. for allegedly creating a Rs 1,000 crore unsecured loan through 46 transactions over eight days and converting part of it into equity through preferential allotment, leaving six entities with 99.70% of outstanding equity.
    4. Unregistered investment advice through digital channels: Social media based tip providers operate outside the registered investment adviser framework. e.g. SEBI has repeatedly issued orders against finfluencers running paid advisory channels without registration.
    5. Enforcement timelines outrun market timelines: Investigation, interim order, final order and appeal can take years while the price effect is realised in minutes. e.g. an interim order carrying a 21 day response window is issued after the affected settlement is complete.
    6. Corporate governance failures at listed entities: Related party transactions and fund diversion continue to surface after the fact. e.g. the Central Bureau of Investigation registered a case against Gensol Engineering Limited, Gensol EV Lease Limited and their promoters for allegedly causing a loss of Rs 672.74 crore to the Indian Renewable Energy Development Agency Limited.
    7. Concentration risk from passive investing: As index funds grow, index inclusion and rebalancing decisions move prices independently of company fundamentals. e.g. volatility on MSCI and FTSE rebalancing days for NIFTY 50 stocks ran 1.8 times and 1.5 times the normal session volatility in 2024.
    8. Cross border and offshore derivative exposure: Positions built through offshore derivative instruments and foreign entities complicate beneficial ownership tracing. e.g. the first CAS manipulation order named a Mauritius domiciled investment entity.
    9. Investor grievance redress capacity: The volume of complaints from a rapidly widening retail base outpaces the capacity of the online dispute resolution and grievance mechanisms. e.g. the SCORES platform and the Online Dispute Resolution portal were both introduced in response to backlogs rather than in anticipation of them.

    Way Forward

    1. Align the derivative and cash market close: Extend an auction based or reference linked close to the derivatives segment, so that the spot and futures legs settle against a consistent price and the expiry day arbitrage gap closes.
    2. Publish indicative equilibrium prices and imbalance during the window: Adopt the NASDAQ and New York Stock Exchange practice of disseminating indicative prices and order imbalance, so that participants can supply liquidity against a visible imbalance rather than trade blind.
    3. Randomise the auction close: Follow the London Stock Exchange and Australian Securities Exchange practice of a randomised uncrossing moment, so that an order timed to the final instant cannot determine the outcome.
    4. Penalise order and cancellation patterns directly: Frame an explicit order to trade ratio and cancellation threshold for the auction window, so that placing large orders with no intention of execution is actionable on the pattern itself rather than only on proof of derivative gain.
    5. Phase the extension to illiquid securities: Extend CAS beyond futures and options eligible stocks only where a minimum order participation threshold is demonstrated, so that thin counters are not given a closing price that no consensus supports.
    6. Run a structured transition programme for algorithmic participants: Publish auction microstructure documentation and offer a simulated environment, since the regulator has itself identified model dependence on the old mechanism as the core adjustment problem.
    7. Invest in retail investor communication: Explain through exchange and broker interfaces why the last traded price and the official closing price now differ, so that the change does not itself become a source of mistrust.
    8. Publish a market quality dashboard: Report tracking error, closing price variance, bid ask spreads and auction liquidity on a rolling basis, so that CAS is evaluated on the metrics the reform was designed to improve rather than on daily volatility.

    Matching Previous Year Question

    “[2025] Consider the following statements: I. India accounts for a very large portion of all equity option contracts traded globally, thus exhibiting a great boom. II. India's stock market has grown rapidly in the recent past, even overtaking Hong Kong's at some point in time. III. There is no regulatory body either to warn small investors about the risks of options trading or to act on unregistered financial advisors in this regard. Which of the statements given above are correct? (a) I and II only (b) II and III only (c) I and III only (d) I, II and III Answer: (a)”

More posts