Mains Ready By December. Smash Mains & Smash PYQ Admissions Open
Talk to Mentor

Civilsdaily

Search results for: “”

  • SC voids Yes Bank’s $883 mn AT-1 bond write-off

    Why in the News

    Yes Bank’s 2020 rescue wiped out its additional tier-1 (AT1) bondholders but only locked in its shareholders for a few years, reversing the usual rule that owners lose before lenders. The Supreme Court of India has now set aside that write-off of about ₹84 billion ($883.70 million), a blow to the lender and to the regulators who defended it.

    What are AT1 bonds, and why were Yes Bank’s written off?

    1. What it is: An AT1 bond is a bond with no maturity date that counts toward a bank’s Tier 1 capital, the core cushion that absorbs losses. Like a shock absorber, it pays higher interest but can be written off or turned into equity under stress.
    2. Why banks issue them: Under the global Basel III capital norms, they let a bank raise loss absorbing capital without issuing new shares. Investors are paid more for carrying that extra risk.
    3. Collapse and rescue: Yes Bank was declared insolvent six years ago. Under the Yes Bank Reconstruction Scheme, 2020, issued under the Banking Regulation Act, 1949, investors led by the State Bank of India (SBI) put money into the bank.
    4. Unequal burden: The AT1 bonds were written off in full. Equity holders, who normally absorb losses first, faced only a three year lock-in on 75% of their shares.
    5. The takeaway: The rescue reversed the usual order of loss, so bondholders paid for the bank’s failure ahead of its owners.

    How did the dispute reach the Supreme Court?

    1. High Court ruling: Yes Bank’s AT1 bondholders challenged the write-off, and the Bombay High Court ruled in their favour in 2023.
    2. Appeal by lender and regulators: Yes Bank, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) and the Union government appealed that ruling to the Supreme Court.
    3. Supreme Court outcome: The Supreme Court has now set aside the write-off, so the bondholders’ win in the High Court stands.
    4. New ownership: Japan’s Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation (SMBC) now holds a 24% stake in Yes Bank, so the bank facing the bondholders’ claim has a new major shareholder.

    Why does the ruling matter beyond Yes Bank?

    1. Creditor hierarchy: Insolvency practice ranks lenders above shareholders. A rescue that erases bondholders but spares equity turns that order upside down.
    2. Limits on regulators: The ruling narrows how freely the RBI and the Union government can impose losses in a future rescue.
    3. Cost of bank capital: Banks sell AT1 bonds only if investors trust that write-offs follow fixed rules, so a write-off later voided affects how such bonds are priced.

    Challenges

    1. Judgement based triggers: A regulator decides by judgement when AT1 bonds may be written off, so investors challenge the decision in court.
    2. Mis-selling to small savers: AT1 bonds were sold to retail investors as safe products. Eg. Securities and Exchange Board of India penalised Yes Bank (2021).
    3. Global precedent: Other regulators face the same dispute. Eg. Switzerland’s 2023 write-off of Credit Suisse AT1 bonds.
    4. Slow resolution: A dispute lasting six years leaves the bank’s capital position and investors’ claims unsettled.

    Way Forward

    1. Codify the loss order: The RBI should state that equity absorbs losses before AT1 bonds in any reconstruction scheme.
    2. Objective trigger: Define the point of non-viability (when a bank cannot survive without rescue) in published, measurable terms.
    3. Institutional buyers only: Keep AT1 bonds limited to institutional investors who can price the write-off risk.

    Conclusion

    The Supreme Court has undone a rescue measure that made a bank’s lenders bear losses ahead of its owners. How Yes Bank settles the revived bonds, and whether the RBI rewrites its rules for bank rescues, is what to watch.

    Matching Previous Year Question

    “[2015] Basel III Accord’ or simply ‘Basel III’ often seen in the news, seeks to (a) develop national strategies for the conservation and sustainable use of biological diversity (b) improve banking sector’s ability to deal with financial and economic stress and improve risk management (c) reduce the greenhouse gas emissions but places a heavier burden on developed countries (d) transfer technology from developed countries to poor countries to enable them to replace the use of chlorofluorocarbons in refrigeration with harmless chemicals ANSWER: (b)”

  • Rs 53,428 cr. cleared for social assistance scheme till 2030-31

    Rs 53,428 cr. cleared for social assistance scheme till 2030-31

    Why in the News

    The Centre’s pension scheme for poor elderly people, widows and persons with disabilities has been renamed from the National Social Assistance Programme (NSAP) to the Pradhan Mantri Samajik Sahayata Yojana, with its budget fixed for five years. The Union Cabinet approved Rs 53,428 crore for 2026-27 to 2030-31. Critics argue the scheme is already too small to reach everyone eligible.

    What is the NSAP?

    1. What it is: The NSAP pays small monthly pensions from the Centre to poor elderly people, widows and persons with disabilities. It works like a minimum floor, to which States add their own benefits.
    2. Why it was introduced: It took effect on 15 August 1995 to set minimum national standards for social assistance across States.
    3. Constitutional basis: It gives effect to Article 41, a Directive Principle, a constitutional goal courts cannot enforce, asking the State to provide public assistance in old age, sickness and disablement.
    4. Components: Three pension sub-schemes cover old age, widowhood and disability, alongside a family benefit scheme for households that lose a breadwinner and Annapurna.
    5. The takeaway: The NSAP is the Centre’s main cash safety net for people who cannot work, so its size decides how many of them are protected.

    What has the Cabinet changed?

    1. Prefix dropped: The “Indira Gandhi” prefix is removed from all three pension sub-schemes.
    2. Disability pension revised: The Cabinet changed who qualifies for the disability pension (eligibility criteria) and how much it pays (assistance rates). The new figures have not been made public.
    3. Rest unchanged: Old age and widow pensions and the family benefit scheme continue “in their existing form”.
    4. Budget locked in: The outlay is fixed for the full five years, so it does not rise on its own with prices or population.

    Why do critics call it inadequate?

    1. Fixed beneficiary cap: The NSAP limits its three pension schemes to 3.09 crore beneficiaries, a number set in advance. Several other welfare schemes instead identify beneficiaries from Socio Economic and Caste Census (SECC) 2011 data.
    2. Eligibility without entitlement: Azim Premji University’s handbook, “Realising Rights: A Handbook of Welfare in India”, finds the ceiling matches neither administrative capacity nor the number of eligible people. So qualifying for a pension does not guarantee receiving one.
    3. Static assumption: An Associate Professor at Azim Premji University says the decision assumes the number of beneficiaries will stay the same, ignoring demographic change and inflation.
    4. Shortfall estimate: If prices rise 5% a year, paying even today’s beneficiaries would cost about Rs 55,698 crore, more than the approved outlay.

    Challenges

    1. Exclusion by quota: Under a fixed cap, an eligible elderly person or widow waits for a vacancy instead of receiving a pension on qualifying.
    2. Ageing population: The elderly share of India’s population is rising, so a frozen cap covers a shrinking fraction of those in need.
    3. Eroding value: Central pension amounts are not indexed to inflation, so their real value falls every year.
    4. Unequal top ups: States add very different amounts, so a pensioner’s income depends on her State of residence.

    Way Forward

    1. Index to prices: The Ministry of Rural Development should link central pension amounts and the outlay to the Consumer Price Index.
    2. Data based ceiling: Replace the fixed cap with a ceiling drawn from current poverty and population data, revised every year.
    3. Mid term review: Revisit the five year outlay halfway through against actual demand.
    4. Publish disability changes: Release the revised disability criteria and rates so applicants know what they can claim.

    Conclusion

    The renaming leaves the scheme’s central weakness, a fixed beneficiary ceiling, untouched for five more years. Whether the outlay is revisited as prices and the elderly population rise will decide if eligibility turns into an actual pension.

    Back2Basics: Socio Economic and Caste Census (SECC) 2011

    1. What it is: A household survey of economic deprivation and caste, begun in 2011 across rural and urban India.
    2. Who ran it: The Ministry of Rural Development led the rural survey and the then Ministry of Housing and Urban Poverty Alleviation the urban survey.
    3. How it is used: Its deprivation criteria identify beneficiaries for schemes such as Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana Gramin and Ayushman Bharat Pradhan Mantri Jan Arogya Yojana.

    Matching Previous Year Question

    “[2008] Consider the following statements with reference to Indira Gandhi National Old Age Pension Scheme (IGNOAPS): 1. All persons of 60 years or above belonging to the household below the poverty line in rural areas are eligible. 2. The Central Assistance under this Scheme is at the rate of Rs. 300 per month per beneficiary. Under the Scheme, States have been urged to give matching amounts. (a) 1 Only (b) 2 Only (c) Both 1 and 2 (d) Neither 1 nor 2 ANSWER: (d)”

  • A split verdict, faltering remedies and people’s power

    A split verdict, faltering remedies and people’s power

    Why in the News

    The choice of the Chief Election Commissioner (CEC) and Election Commissioners (ECs) was to be shielded from the executive after Anoop Baranwal vs Union of India (2023), yet a 2023 law handing it back to a government led panel remains in force. In Dr. Jaya Thakur vs Union of India, a two judge Bench of the Supreme Court delivered a split verdict on that law, leaving it to a Constitution Bench.

    What did Anoop Baranwal settle, and what does the 2023 Act do?

    1. What it is: The CEC and ECs run elections as neutral umpires. A Constitution Bench in Baranwal held that a committee with executive predominance, one the government of the day controls, cannot select them, much like one team cannot pick the referee.
    2. The 2023 Act: The Chief Election Commissioner and Other Election Commissioners (Appointment, Conditions of Service and Term of Office) Act, 2023 gives selection to the Prime Minister, a Union Minister he chooses and the Leader of the Opposition.
    3. Government majority: The Prime Minister and his Minister form two thirds of the committee, so the Opposition leader can always be outvoted.
    4. Lifelong immunity: The Act also gives the CEC and ECs lifelong immunity for their acts and words in office.
    5. The takeaway: Whoever controls the selection committee decides who runs elections.

    How did the two judges split?

    1. Justice Dipankar Datta: Baranwal settled the position, so the Act must be tested against it. A panel led by the Prime Minister and his Minister has the executive predominance Baranwal barred.
    2. Justice Satish Chandra Sharma: The issues were important enough to need a reference to a larger Constitution Bench.
    3. Common order: On September 23, 2026, the judges jointly sought an early hearing by a Constitution Bench.
    4. Delay as failure: Counsel for the petitioners calls the reference an “institutional confession” that the Court failed to decide in time.

    Why is the referral itself under question?

    1. Undisclosed link: Justice Sharma’s son has served as empanelled standing counsel, a lawyer on the regular panel, for the Election Commission of India (ECI) in the Madhya Pradesh High Court. The link went undisclosed, a possible conflict of interest.
    2. Recall petitions: Petitions in the Supreme Court now seek to recall and nullify Justice Sharma’s order.
    3. Rupa Ashok Hurra vs Ashok Hurra (2002): A Constitution Bench indicated that a judge’s failure to disclose a link with the subject or the parties vitiates, or taints, the judgment, so it warrants a revisit.
    4. Judicial ethics codes: The Bangalore Principles of Judicial Conduct bar impropriety and its appearance, including sitting where a family member is linked to the case. The Court’s Restatement of Values of Judicial Life (May 1997) agrees.

    Why look beyond the courts?

    1. Ambedkar’s 1951 speech: Justice Datta quoted B.R. Ambedkar’s speech of October 28, 1951. It cited Shyama Prasad Mukherjee’s charge that officials were helping the ruling Congress.
    2. Ambedkar’s warning: Ambedkar warned that a failed parliamentary democracy would end in “rebellion, anarchy and Communism”.
    3. Laws undone by politics: The Court upheld the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 (TADA) and the Prevention of Terrorism Act, 2002 (POTA). TADA was later allowed to lapse and POTA was repealed.
    4. Emergency verdict: The Court upheld the Emergency, including in ADM Jabalpur (1976), yet voters removed that government at the next election.
    5. Farm laws: Parliament repealed the farm laws in 2021 after massive protests.

    Challenges

    1. Contested umpires keep working: Commissioners chosen under the challenged Act will run elections until a Constitution Bench rules.
    2. Recusal left to conscience: No written procedure obliges a judge to disclose a family link before hearing a case.
    3. One resignation fixes little: Protests, including by the Cockroach Janta Party, seek the CEC’s resignation, but a successor would come through the same selection design.
    4. Low public trust: Voters already doubt electoral institutions, and delay deepens it.

    Way Forward

    1. Neutral selection body: Parliament should repeal the 2023 Act and let a neutral body select the CEC and ECs.
    2. Hearing schedule: The Chief Justice of India should form the Constitution Bench promptly with a fixed timeline.
    3. Written disclosure: Judges should record any family link with a party or counsel before a hearing begins.
    4. Review of the rolls: The controversial revision of electoral rolls should be revisited and wrongful deletions undone.

    Conclusion

    Who chooses India’s election umpires is settled in principle but open in practice. The pace of the Constitution Bench and the fate of the recall petitions will show whether courts or the street settle it first.

    Matching Previous Year Question

    “[2026, GS2, 10 marks] Is the right to vote a fundamental right? Discuss the position of the Election Commission of India while undertaking the revision of electoral rolls. Can it also examine the question of citizenship of voters?”

  • Assess resource availability for data centres: NITI Aayog

    Assess resource availability for data centres: NITI Aayog

    Why in the News

    Data centre approvals would move from project by project clearances to approvals tied to verified availability of electricity, water and other infrastructure, planned across whole infrastructure corridors rather than site by site. The shift is proposed in an evaluation framework developed jointly by the National Institution for Transforming India (NITI) Aayog and Deloitte India. The framework also asks States to weigh each project’s economic benefits against the public support it receives.

    What is a data centre, and why does it strain local resources?

    1. What it is: A data centre is a building full of servers, powerful computers that store and process data for apps, cloud services and artificial intelligence. It works like a factory that never shuts and must always be kept cool.
    2. Power and water demand: Servers draw electricity round the clock, and many sites use water to cool them, so a large campus competes with nearby homes, farms and industry for both.
    3. Local opposition: As the sector has expanded rapidly, residents have opposed projects over the water, electricity and land they take.
    4. The takeaway: Clearing a data centre without first checking local power and water can leave residents paying for a facility the area cannot sustain.

    How fast is India’s data centre capacity growing?

    1. Number of facilities: India had 271 data centres as of January 2026, according to the Council on Energy, Environment and Water (CEEW), a policy research institution.
    2. Installed capacity: Their capacity, the electrical load the facilities are built to draw, stood at about 1.57 gigawatts (GW) in August 2026, according to the Union government.
    3. Projected capacity: Industry estimates put capacity at 4.5 to 6.5 GW by 2030, several times today’s level.

    What does the framework ask of States and developers?

    1. Long range water checks: Before a project is sited, States would assess how much water is available in each season over the next 20 to 30 years.
    2. Existing users first: States must protect existing users of water and power, so a new campus does not cut supply to towns and farms.
    3. Developer funded grid: Developers must pay for grid assets, the power lines and equipment built only for their projects, rather than passing that cost to other consumers.
    4. Net benefit test: States must count the land, infrastructure and utility concessions they give a project as a public cost, and set that cost against the economic benefits they claim.
    5. Outcome linked incentives: The framework proposes tying incentives to measurable results: employment, renewable energy use, efficiency and local procurement.

    Who will oversee it, and is it binding?

    1. Five pillar framework: The framework is organised as a ‘five pillar framework’, which also covers environmental safeguards, climate risks and governance.
    2. Central audit: The framework proposes a central audit mechanism to check compliance. The Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (MeitY) would be the nodal, or lead, Ministry.
    3. Legal status unclear: The document does not say whether the framework has been formally adopted or whether its recommendations will bind States.

    Challenges

    1. Advisory status: Until it is adopted, States competing for investment can skip the resource checks and keep offering open ended concessions.
    2. Water stressed hubs: Data centres cluster in large cities that already face water shortages. Eg. Chennai, a data centre hub, ran short of water in 2019.
    3. Coal heavy grid: Round the clock demand is met largely from coal fired power, so rapid growth raises emissions unless renewable supply keeps pace.
    4. Thin water data: Few States hold the long term hydrological records that multi decade seasonal assessments require.
    5. Few local jobs: Highly automated facilities employ few people once built, so employment linked incentives reward little.

    Way Forward

    1. Formal notification: MeitY should issue the framework as guidelines and link any central support to compliance.
    2. Published assessments: States should publish water and power assessments for each corridor before allotting land.
    3. Low water cooling: Developers should adopt closed loop or air cooling and disclose annual water and power use.
    4. Verified green power: Developers should contract renewable power for new capacity, checked by the central audit.

    Conclusion

    India’s data centre growth now has a resource first framework on paper, with no word yet on whether it binds anyone. Whether MeitY adopts it and States write its water and power checks into their own data centre policies is the step to watch.

    Matching Previous Year Question

    “[2017] In India, it is legally mandatory for which of the following to report on cyber security incidents? 1. Service providers 2. Data Centres 3. Body corporate Select the correct answer using the code given below: (a) 1 only (b) 1 and 2 only (c) 3 only (d) 1, 2 and 3 ANSWER: (d)”

  • Food, fuel nudge wholesale inflation in Sept. to 11.4%

    Food, fuel nudge wholesale inflation in Sept. to 11.4%

    Why in the News

    Wholesale inflation is usually read as a food and fuel story, but in September non food manufactured goods, known as core inflation, drove more than half of the rise over August. Wholesale Price Index (WPI) inflation reached 11.4%, a record in the new series and a 49 month high on the old one.

    What is the WPI, and why does it have two series?

    1. What it is: The WPI tracks the average change in prices of goods traded in bulk between businesses, before they reach shops. It is like the price a shopkeeper pays the wholesaler, not the price a customer pays.
    2. What it covers: It covers only goods, in three groups: primary articles (farm and mineral goods), fuel and power, and manufactured products.
    3. New series: The new WPI uses 2022-23 as its base year, the year whose prices are set at 100.
    4. Old series: The older series, on a 2011-12 base, has a long history. The new one starts only in April 2024, so September’s figure is read on both.
    5. The takeaway: Wholesale prices show cost pressure on firms before it reaches shop shelves, so a rise here warns of higher inflation ahead for households.

    What pushed wholesale inflation up in September?

    1. Food articles: Food inflation rose to 8.1% from 5.7% in August.
    2. Low base: Food prices had contracted 6.8% in September last year, so the year on year comparison lifts this year’s rate, a base effect.
    3. Fuel and power: Inflation rose to 25.85%. That is only a three month high, because fuel prices had risen even faster in May and June.
    4. Manufactured goods: Inflation hit a series high of 9.8%, up from 8.4% in August.
    5. Non food primary articles: Inflation stayed high at 10.3%, its lowest level in four months.

    Why does the core reading matter?

    1. Core WPI: It covers non food manufactured goods and leaves out volatile food and fuel, so it shows whether price rises have spread through industry.
    2. Driver of the rise: Core WPI accounted for more than half of the 147 basis point uptick in the headline. A basis point is a hundredth of a percentage point.
    3. Cost pass through: ICRA, a credit rating agency, reads this as pass through of input costs: firms paying more for fuel and materials raise the prices of what they make.
    4. Broad based pressure: The PHD Chamber of Commerce and Industry said the rise across food, fuel and manufactured products means businesses must closely monitor input costs and pricing.

    Challenges

    1. Retail spillover: Higher factory costs tend to reach consumer prices with a lag, adding to household inflation.
    2. Short new series: With only two and a half years of data, the new series offers little history for judging trends.
    3. Base effects: A low year ago base can exaggerate the headline, as with food this September.
    4. Imported fuel: India imports most of its crude oil, so global price swings pass straight into fuel and power.

    Way Forward

    1. Watch core WPI: The Monetary Policy Committee should weigh core wholesale inflation alongside the retail measure it targets.
    2. Link the two series: The Office of the Economic Adviser, which compiles the WPI, should publish a linked back series joining the new and old indices.
    3. Cushion fuel costs: The Centre should calibrate fuel taxes to limit pass through of fuel price spikes.

    Conclusion

    Wholesale inflation is no longer only about food and fuel, since factory goods now carry much of the rise. Whether core WPI keeps climbing, and how much of it reaches retail prices, is what to watch in the coming months.

    Matching Previous Year Question

    “[2010] With reference to India, consider the following Statements: 1. The Wholesale Price Index (WPI) in India is available on a monthly basis only 2. As compared to Consumer Price Index for Industrial Workers (CPI (IW)), the WPI gives less weight to food articles. Which of the statements given above is/are correct? (a) 1 only (b) 2 only (c) Both 1 and 2 (d) Neither 1 nor 2 ANSWER: (c)”

  • FDI windfall as Cabinet clears 60.7% IDBI stake sale to Canada’s Fairfax

    FDI windfall as Cabinet clears 60.7% IDBI stake sale to Canada’s Fairfax

    Why in the News

    IDBI Bank is passing from Life Insurance Corporation (LIC) and government control to a foreign strategic buyer, in the largest ever foreign direct investment (FDI) in India’s financial sector. The Cabinet Committee on Economic Affairs (CCEA) has chosen Toronto based Fairfax Financial Holdings to buy a 60.72% stake for Rs 52,878 crore.

    What is the IDBI sale, and why is it called a restructuring?

    1. What it is: In a strategic disinvestment, the state sells a controlling stake, with management control, to a private buyer, like a family selling most of its business to a new owner who runs it.
    2. How IDBI reached LIC: Poor financial health led LIC to buy a majority stake in IDBI Bank in 2019 and become its promoter, the controlling owner. The bank was then classed as private.
    3. Who sells: Before the sale LIC held 49.24% of the bank and the government 45.48%.
    4. Who stays: After the sale LIC will hold 19% and the government 15%. The Finance Minister called it “not a disinvestment, but a restructuring”, since the government remains invested.
    5. The takeaway: A sale pending for over four years now hands a state backed bank to a foreign promoter, and the state keeps a minority stake.

    What conditions come with the sale?

    1. Continuity terms: Fairfax must retain the bank’s name for three years after completion, and its capital is locked in for five years.
    2. One promoter, one bank: Fairfax owns 40% of Thrissur based CSB Bank through FIH Mauritius Investments. Since one promoter cannot own two banks, it must merge CSB with IDBI Bank or exit CSB within two years.
    3. Glide path: Fairfax must cut its stake to 26% over 15 years, on a schedule to be settled with the Reserve Bank of India (RBI). It must first clear the RBI’s compliance process.
    4. LIC’s exit path: LIC must bring its holding down to 15% within two years of completion.
    5. Residual sale: The CCEA has empowered the Alternative Mechanism, a panel of Union Ministers that settles sale terms, to sell the government’s remaining stake on the open market.

    Why does it matter for the budget and the banking sector?

    1. Disinvestment target: The proceeds will help the Centre meet its Rs 80,000 crore disinvestment target for 2026-27.
    2. Raised so far: The Department of Investment and Public Asset Management (DIPAM), which runs government stake sales, reports Rs 55,757 crore raised so far.
    3. Foreign capital in finance: Other foreign buyers of Indian lenders include Emirates NBD, with 60% of RBL Bank, and Japan’s Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group (MUFG), with 20% of Shriram Finance.
    4. Disinvestment record: Earlier strategic sales include Air India and Neelachal Ispat Nigam Limited in 2022, Ferro Scrap Nigam Limited in early 2025, and Indian Medicines Pharmaceuticals Corporation Limited in May.

    Is the price fair?

    1. Bid premium: Fairfax bid Rs 81 a share, above the Rs 70.38 close on the last trading day before ‘best offer bids’ were invited.
    2. Market reaction: On the day of approval IDBI Bank shares surged 9% to close at Rs 90.39, on speculation the sale was imminent.
    3. Employee objection: IDBI Bank officers and the employees’ union oppose the sale, saying the price is too low. A separate fund now covers the pensions of former employees.

    Challenges

    1. Slow dilution: Promoter control stays concentrated for years, and the exact stake reduction path is still to be settled with the RBI.
    2. Merger disruption: Folding CSB Bank into IDBI Bank within the deadline can unsettle customers and staff of both banks.
    3. Valuation dispute: A market price above the bid feeds the charge that a public asset was sold cheap.

    Way Forward

    1. Publish the glide path: The RBI should set out Fairfax’s stake reduction schedule before completion.
    2. Disclose the valuation basis: DIPAM should publish how the reserve price was set, to answer the underpricing charge.
    3. Protect staff terms: The new promoter should honour existing service conditions through the CSB Bank decision.

    Conclusion

    The IDBI sale turns a long stalled privatisation into a foreign owned bank. What to watch is the RBI’s approval of the glide path, Fairfax’s choice on CSB Bank, and whether the deal closes on schedule.

    Key numbers

    1. Sale timeline: best offer bids invited 18 May 2026; completion expected by March 2027.
    2. Emirates NBD in RBL Bank: nearly $3 billion, completed June 2026.
    3. MUFG in Shriram Finance: $4.4 billion.
    4. Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation (SMBC) in YES Bank: 24.2% for a little under $2 billion (2025).

    Matching Previous Year Question

    “[2025] Consider the following statements: I. Capital receipts create a liability or cause a reduction in the assets of the Government. II. Borrowings and disinvestment are capital receipts. III. Interest received on loans creates a liability of the Government. Which of the statements given above are correct? (a) I and II only (b) II and III only (c) I and III only (d) I, II and III ANSWER: (a)”

  • The myth of ‘unskilled’ labour

    The myth of ‘unskilled’ labour

    Why in the News

    The ‘unskilled’ wage grade was meant to set minimum wages by the skill a job demands. Factories now use it to withhold annual increments, health benefits and safety training. Labelled workers lose more fingers in accidents and suffer more wage theft, and the state’s own wage schedules keep the label alive.

    What does the ‘unskilled’ label do?

    1. What it is: Wage law sorts workers into grades, from unskilled to highly skilled, each with its own minimum wage, like a pay scale where the grade, not the work done, fixes pay.
    2. Legal basis: The Code on Wages, 2019 requires governments to weigh skill level, geographical area and whether work is arduous or hazardous when fixing minimum wages.
    3. Separate floors: Union wage schedules then set different floors for otherwise comparable work. September’s daily farm rate ran from ₹528 for unskilled to ₹694 for highly skilled work.
    4. Official definition: Weeding and manually watering crops count as unskilled, needing “only” physical effort. Highly skilled work means calibrating a combine harvester or managing pest outbreaks.
    5. The takeaway: The grade decides pay, benefits and training, so a wrong label costs a worker far more than a wage gap.

    What does the label cost workers?

    1. Injury gap: The Safe in India Foundation found that ‘unskilled’ auto sector workers lost 2.27 fingers per accident on average, against 1.54 for skilled workers.
    2. Cause of injuries: Employers put ‘unskilled’ workers on dangerous power press machines without training or safety measures.
    3. Contractor practices: Contractors deny construction workers personal protective equipment and often the final month’s pay, knowing labourers lack legal recourse.
    4. Wage theft: The International Institute of Migration and Development, Thiruvananthapuram, estimates ‘unskilled’ migrant workers in Keralam’s construction and hospitality sectors face 40% more wage theft.
    5. Unequal relief: After wage protests in Noida and New Delhi, Uttar Pradesh raised interim pay to ₹13,690 a month for ‘unskilled’ and ₹16,868 for ‘skilled’ workers, who face the same inflation.

    Why is ‘unskilled’ a misnomer?

    1. Skills expected: ‘Unskilled’ workers must spot defects, use power tools, hold tolerances in repetitive production, and recognise hazardous gases in confined spaces.
    2. Learned farm techniques: Weeding and irrigation need learned skills: identifying weeds, assessing soil and planning work around the weather.
    3. Credentials over competence: Workers gain embodied knowledge (skill learned by doing), yet institutions call them unskilled because they lack formal credentials, which concentrates them in informal jobs.
    4. Social ranking: The labour market ranks workers by caste, class, gender and increasingly migration, and this ranking shapes what work counts as ‘skilled’.

    How does the state keep workers ‘unskilled’?

    1. State made status: ‘Unskilled’ is a status the state keeps in place, not a natural fact about the work, and the state fails to improve these workers’ job security.
    2. Informalisation: Municipal corporations hire sanitation workers through contractors, so competence matters less for job status. These workers also miss safety protocols.
    3. Self reinforcing trap: Low wages stop workers from earning qualifications or escaping precarious work, and precarious work makes employers unwilling to train them.

    Challenges

    1. Grades by job title: Wage schedules grade the task, not the worker’s tested competence, so experienced workers stay at the bottom.
    2. Weak recourse: Workers without contracts or legal support rarely contest withheld pay or unsafe assignments.
    3. Safety tied to grade: Safety training follows the worker’s grade rather than the hazard of the machine they operate.

    Way Forward

    1. Certify skill on the job: Expand Recognition of Prior Learning under Skill India to certify skills workers already use.
    2. Regrade by task content: The Union and States should regrade wage schedules by each task’s hazard and judgment content.
    3. Safety for every grade: Labour inspectors should enforce training and protective gear for anyone on hazardous machines.
    4. Equal inflation relief: Wage revisions should index every grade to the same inflation measure.

    Conclusion

    The ‘unskilled’ grade has turned from a wage category into a social ranking that denies workers pay, safety and benefits. Whether wage boards regrade work by what it demands and certify skills learned on the job will decide if the label stops trapping workers.

    Back2Basics: Code on Wages, 2019

    1. What it does: It consolidates four wage laws, including the Minimum Wages Act, 1948 and the Payment of Wages Act, 1936.
    2. Statutory floor wage: The Centre sets a floor, and no State may fix its minimum wage below it.
    3. Universal coverage: Minimum wages now cover every worker, up from about 30% of workers earlier.
    4. In force: It is one of the four Labour Codes, in effect from 21 November 2025.

    Matching Previous Year Question

    “[2024, GS3, 15 marks] Discuss the merits and demerits of the four ‘Labour Codes’ in the context of labour market reforms in India. What has been the progress so far in this regard?”

  • India’s China+1 lessons lie within its own States

    India’s China+1 lessons lie within its own States

    Why in the News

    Global firms adding factories outside China pick a State, not “India”, according to a 2026 East Asian Institute study based on 50 interviews with executives and policymakers. The best models for other States are at home, in Tamil Nadu and Karnataka.

    Why do States, not India, win China+1 investment?

    1. What it is: China+1 means global firms keep factories in China but add another country, like a shop keeping a second supplier in case the first fails.
    2. The State as the unit: Firms do not see India as one monolithic market. They pick a State, which offers the land, power, approvals, workers and suppliers a factory needs.
    3. Models sought abroad: Policy debate urges India to copy Vietnam, Mexico or Poland, yet the most instructive factories are already rising near Chennai and Bengaluru.
    4. The takeaway: Where a factory lands depends on what a State has built over decades, not on a national pitch.

    How did Tamil Nadu and Karnataka build their pull?

    1. Tamil Nadu’s cluster: Foxconn assembles iPhones at Sriperumbudur and Tata Electronics has expanded at Hosur. Fresh approvals under the Electronics Components Manufacturing Scheme (ECMS), a subsidy for parts makers, are commitments, not finished factories.
    2. Decades of preparation: None of this began with China+1. Tamil Nadu spent four or five decades building technical education, an automobile and components industry and a supplier base.
    3. Limits of the model: Tamil Nadu now runs short of land, power and labour. So it relies on migrant workers and courts capital intensive manufacturing and innovation led exports.
    4. Karnataka’s talent route: Bengaluru began with software and engineering talent, not an automobile base. Foxconn has a campus at Devanahalli, and Tata Electronics took over Wistron’s iPhone plant at Narsapura in a late 2023 deal.

    What can national incentives do, and what can they not?

    1. Tariff plus subsidy: The Production Linked Incentive (PLI) pays firms on extra output made in India. A 20 per cent duty plus a 6 per cent PLI payout means competitors “cannot compete”.
    2. PLI succession: The electronics PLI ended in March 2026. The Cabinet approved a successor scheme in July.
    3. ECMS spread: In January the Centre cleared 22 ECMS proposals across eight States, calling it “geographically balanced industrial growth”.
    4. Press Note 3 eased: In March the Cabinet eased Press Note 3, the rule that curbs investment from countries sharing a land border with India.

    What do the investment and trade numbers hide?

    1. Tamil Nadu ranks fifth: In the Department for Promotion of Industry and Internal Trade (DPIIT) data on foreign direct investment (FDI) inflows, Tamil Nadu is only fifth, at about 6%.
    2. Head office rule: DPIIT records FDI against the company’s head office State, so it says little about where factories are built.
    3. Assembly, not components: “Very few components are manufactured in India”, so backward linkages (local suppliers feeding the factory) remain thin.
    4. Slow sourcing: One firm has reached only about $600 million of its $1 billion target for buying inputs in India, because local value addition takes years to build.
    5. Trade gap: Electronics imports run at more than twice exports, so component manufacturing has ground to cover.

    Challenges

    1. Thin domestic value: One executive called the exports “assembled products with 20 per cent inputs in India”.
    2. Regional concentration: Growth is “largely happening in the southern and western parts”, not in Bihar, Chhattisgarh or Jharkhand.
    3. Policy continuity: Investors want commitments honoured across political turnover, tested after Tamil Nadu’s change of government in May 2026.
    4. Thin subsidies: Spreading subsidies thinly will not replicate Tamil Nadu’s supplier networks or Karnataka’s technical labour pool.

    Way Forward

    1. Document State playbooks: Lagging States should study how Tamil Nadu and Karnataka prepared land, trained workers, cleared approvals, nurtured suppliers and retained investors.
    2. Locate FDI by plant: DPIIT should also record FDI by the State where the plant is built.
    3. Supplier development: Component schemes should favour local firms that supply parts to existing assemblers.

    Conclusion

    India’s gains from firms leaving China have come from States that spent decades building industrial ecosystems, not from national incentives alone. Whether lagging States build supplier networks and skilled workforces, not thinner subsidies, will decide if the shift spreads beyond the south and west.

    Key numbers

    1. FDI equity shares, October 2019 to March 2026 (DPIIT): Maharashtra 31%, Karnataka 21%, Gujarat 15%, Delhi 13%.
    2. ECMS approvals, January 2026: ₹41,863 crore, 33,791 expected direct jobs.
    3. Electronics trade, 2025-26: exports about $48 billion; imports about $116 billion.
    4. Foxconn, Devanahalli: about 50,000 jobs targeted; women about 80% of workforce.

    Matching Previous Year Question

    “[2025, GS3, 15 marks] Discuss the rationale of the Production Linked Incentive (PLI) scheme. What are its achievements? In what way can the functioning and outcomes of the scheme be improved?”

  • Drought report: On southwest monsoon, drought in Karnataka and Andhra Pradesh

    Drought report: On southwest monsoon, drought in Karnataka and Andhra Pradesh

    Why in the News

    Karnataka and Andhra Pradesh face substantial drought after a deficient southwest monsoon, and both seek extra central help from the National Disaster Response Fund (NDRF). That help now waits on the findings of an Inter-Ministerial Central Team (IMCT), so relief timing rests with the Centre.

    How does a State get central drought aid?

    1. What it is: The national drought framework weighs agricultural and hydrological indicators and ground truthing, or field checks, before a State gets extra NDRF support. It works like a surveyor checking an insurance claim.
    2. Why it was tightened: Declarations were once beset by subjective, sometimes exaggerated claims. Since 2009, the Manual for Drought Management, its updates and Finance Commission decisions have tightened them.
    3. Central verification: An IMCT of officials from several Union ministries visits the State. It verifies the reported losses before aid is approved.
    4. Central reluctance: The Centre has resisted releasing NDRF aid before, including to Karnataka in 2024, and has increased States’ own relief obligations.
    5. The takeaway: A stricter process curbs inflated claims, but it can delay aid when drought is real.

    How severe is the drought in the two States?

    1. Karnataka’s deficit: Karnataka reportedly suffered a rainfall deficit close to 35% in June to September, damaging red gram, maize, cotton and sugarcane.
    2. Karnataka’s declaration: It has declared 217 of 240 taluks drought hit and petitioned the Centre for NDRF aid and higher input subsidies.
    3. Andhra Pradesh’s shortfall: Andhra Pradesh recorded a 53% shortfall in June to August, and over half its mandals are declared drought hit.
    4. Andhra Pradesh’s response: Horticulture crops are at risk, so the State has set aside funds to protect them and directed drinking water conservation.
    5. Weak monsoon: The 2026 summer monsoon was the poorest since 2015, amid warnings of a strengthening El Nino. A study attributing this drought to it is pending.

    Why is drought more than a funding question?

    1. Debt and tenancy: Drought deepens farmer indebtedness, and relief tied to land ownership leaves out tenant farmers.
    2. Advice without limits: Both States offer incentives and advisories for micro-irrigation and less water intensive crops, but impose no binding limits on water use.
    3. Rising climate risk: The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) warns of expanding drought conditions in South Asia, so deficient monsoons will recur.
    4. Interlinking distraction: The protracted river interlinking project should not displace sustainable groundwater use and crops suited to local rainfall and aquifers.

    Challenges

    1. Narrow relief norms: Input subsidy under disaster relief norms is paid only where crop loss reaches 33% or more, leaving moderate losses uncovered.
    2. Slow release: Central aid follows a State memorandum, the IMCT visit and a High Level Committee decision, often months after crops fail.
    3. Insurance gaps: Enrolment in the Pradhan Mantri Fasal Bima Yojana has been voluntary since 2020, and several States have at times opted out of it.
    4. Groundwater stress: Rain fed farms fall back on depleting aquifers in dry years, which deepens the next drought.

    Way Forward

    1. Verified, prompt release: The Centre should release support as soon as the IMCT findings are publicly verified.
    2. Relief beyond ownership: States should extend drought relief to tenant farmers and act on farm indebtedness.
    3. Binding water discipline: States should store water and ration consumption through binding limits, not advisories alone.
    4. Resilience incentives: The Centre should reward drought resilience even in deficient monsoons and broaden agricultural insurance.
    5. Crop and income support: Match crops to local rainfall and aquifers, with income support for farmers who switch.

    Conclusion

    Relief for Karnataka and Andhra Pradesh now hinges on how quickly the Centre acts. Beyond this season, the test is whether States impose binding water limits and the Centre rewards resilience instead of waiting on river interlinking.

    Key numbers

    1. Karnataka’s NDRF request: Rs 11,000 crore.
    2. Andhra Pradesh mandals declared drought hit: 388 of 688.
    3. Andhra Pradesh horticulture: nearly 18,000 hectares at risk; Rs 190 crore set aside.

    Back2Basics: National Disaster Response Fund

    1. Statutory basis: The Fund is constituted under the Disaster Management Act, 2005, and held by the Centre to supplement a State’s own response.
    2. Link with the State fund: A State first meets relief from its State Disaster Response Fund, and the NDRF is used when that is inadequate for a severe disaster.
    3. Financing: It is financed by a cess and budgetary support, and audited by the Comptroller and Auditor General.
    4. Coverage: It covers notified disasters including drought, cyclone, flood, earthquake, landslide, pest attack, cloudburst and cold wave.

    Matching Previous Year Question

    “[2014, GS3, 12 marks] Drought has been recognised as a disaster in view of its party expense, temporal duration, slow onset and lasting effect on various vulnerable sections. With a focus on the September 2010 guidelines from the National disaster management authority, discuss the mechanism for preparedness to deal with the El Nino and La Nina fallouts in India.”

  • How to keep an economy stable using policy tools

    How to keep an economy stable using policy tools

    Why in the News

    Macroeconomic stabilisation has moved from John Maynard Keynes‘s assumed straight line links between economic variables to policy built on how households and firms actually behave. The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences has awarded the Sveriges Riksbank Prize in Economic Sciences in Memory of Alfred Nobel 2026 to Robert E Hall of Stanford University and Michael Woodford of Columbia University, “for microeconomic foundations of macroeconomic stabilisation“.

    What is macroeconomic stabilisation?

    1. What it is: Macroeconomic stabilisation means the policies governments and central banks use to smooth booms and slumps. It works like a thermostat, cooling an overheating economy and warming a slowing one.
    2. Inflation fight: The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) raised interest rates last week to contain inflation. Prices had risen after the war between the United States (US) and Iran and the Strait of Hormuz blockade lifted crude and commodity costs.
    3. Recovery support: In the years around the Covid-19 pandemic, the Union government cut direct taxes and the Goods and Services Tax (GST), and the RBI cut interest rates, to boost consumption and investment.
    4. Cost of doing nothing: Without intervention, inflation can soar and people cut all but essential spending. Many businesses then fail, jobs are lost and recovery takes much longer.
    5. The takeaway: Stabilisation policy decides whether a price or demand shock passes quickly or turns into years of lost jobs and output, which is why the economics behind it earned the prize.

    How did stabilisation policy rise and fall?

    1. Great Depression: A stock market crash in October 1929 began the Great Depression in the US. Thousands of banks and businesses failed, and the crisis spread to Europe.
    2. Scale of the slump: US gross domestic product (GDP), the value of annual output, fell by 30% and the unemployment rate soared to 25%.
    3. Laissez faire: The ruling view of the time held that governments should not intervene in the economy.
    4. Keynes’s remedy: In a slowdown, policymakers should cut rates and taxes and spend more, even on a budget deficit. They should raise rates when the economy overheats.
    5. Stagflation: In the 1970s, repeated oil price shocks brought high inflation and high unemployment together. Boosting growth spiked inflation and fighting inflation worsened unemployment, so Keynesian policy came to be seen as the problem.

    What did Hall and Woodford add?

    1. Grounded in data: From the late 1970s, the two rebuilt the Keynesian approach on research. Keynes had assumed linear links, such as between inflation and unemployment; they studied ground level data instead.
    2. Hall, the demand side: Hall studied how people decide how much to consume, and when they raise or cut spending, using household data.
    3. Hand to mouth households: In 1982, Hall used microdata on individual households to show that not everyone raises spending when they expect higher income. Hand to mouth households, which spend what they earn, do not.
    4. Woodford, the supply side: Firms do not change prices every day, and they look to the future when fixing them. So expectations about future interest rates shape today’s inflation.

    Why does their work matter for policy today?

    1. Forward guidance: Woodford’s finding means central banks must clearly convey what they intend to do, because firms set prices on that basis. This practice is known as forward guidance.
    2. Evidence based policy: Hall’s household level evidence on who changes spending, and when, has informed policy choices on supporting consumption.
    3. Resilience to shocks: A pandemic, wars that spiked commodity prices and policy missteps such as tariffs have hit the world economy. Growth has still surprised on the upside, partly because policy draws on such work.

    Conclusion

    Stabilisation policy now rests on evidence about how real households and firms behave rather than on assumed relationships, which has made a central bank’s communication a policy tool in its own right. How clearly the RBI signals its path as it fights oil driven inflation is a live test of that insight in India.

    Back2Basics: Sveriges Riksbank Prize in Economic Sciences

    1. Origin: Sveriges Riksbank, Sweden’s central bank, instituted the prize in 1968 to mark its 300th anniversary. It is not one of the five prizes in Alfred Nobel’s will.
    2. Award: The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences selects the laureates. The first prize, in 1969, went to Ragnar Frisch and Jan Tinbergen.
    3. Indian laureates: Amartya Sen won in 1998, and Abhijit Banerjee in 2019, with Esther Duflo and Michael Kremer.
    4. Prize money: This year’s laureates share 12 million Swedish kronor, about Rs 12 crore.

    Matching Previous Year Question

    “[2024, GS3, 10 marks] What are the causes of persistent high food inflation in India? Comment on the effectiveness of the monetary policy of the RBI to control this type of inflation.”

More posts