💥Mains Ready By December. Smash Mains & Smash PYQ Admissions Open

Search results for: “”

  • Can Parliament remove a judge who has resigned?

    Why in the News

    A parliamentary inquiry committee found all three charges proved against a former High Court judge, including failure to explain cash recovered from his residence and interference with evidence. The issue is whether the removal process can continue after his resignation.

    Removal of Judges: Constitutional Framework

    1. Article 124(4): Supreme Court judges can be removed only for proved misbehaviour or incapacity.
    2. Article 217: Deals with the tenure and removal of High Court judges.
    3. Judges (Inquiry) Act, 1968: Provides the inquiry mechanism and formulation of charges.
    4. Parliamentary approval: Removal requires a special majority in each House, in the same session.
    5. Final step: After Parliament passes the address, the President issues the removal order.

    What did the Inquiry Committee Find?

    • All three charges were proved.
    • The judge failed to satisfactorily explain the cash recovered from his residence.
    • The committee found attempts to interfere with evidence.

    Key Constitutional Issue After Resignation

    • Removal is primarily linked to holding judicial office.
    • Resignation ends the judge’s tenure, creating a question about whether Parliament can still complete the removal process.
    • Possible consequences involving pension or future disqualification make the issue constitutionally significant.
    • There is no settled precedent on completing the removal process against a judge who has already resigned.

    Prelims Facts

    • Ground for removal → Proved misbehaviour or incapacity
    • High Court judge → Article 217
    • Supreme Court judge → Article 124
    • Inquiry procedure → Judges (Inquiry) Act, 1968
    • Removal requires → Special majority in both Houses
    • Final removal order → President
    • Policy disagreement → Not a ground for removal
    • Historical fact → No Indian judge has so far been removed after completion of the parliamentary removal process.

    “[2025, GS2, 15] “Constitutional morality is the fulcrum which acts as an essential check upon the high functionaries and citizens alike…” In view of the above observation of the Supreme Court, explain the concept of constitutional morality and its application to ensure balance between judicial independence and judicial accountability in India.”

    [2021] With reference to Indian Judiciary, consider the following statements:
    1. Any retired judge of the Supreme Court of India can be called back to sit and act as a Supreme Court judge by the Chief Justice of India with prior permission of the president of India.
    2. A High Court in India has the power to review its own judgement as the Supreme Court does.
    Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

    [A] 1 only

    [B] 2 only

    [C] Both 1 and 2

    [D] Neither 1 nor 2

  • The constitutional limits on arrest, reaffirmed

    Why in the News

    An explainer revisits the constitutional limits on arrest after a 2025 Supreme Court ruling. It reaffirms that an arrested person must be meaningfully informed of the grounds of arrest.

    What does Article 22 guarantee on arrest?

    1. Grounds of arrest: Article 22(1) requires that grounds be communicated meaningfully, not as a formality.
    2. Legal counsel: The arrested person has the right to consult a lawyer of choice.
    3. Production before magistrate: Article 22(2) requires production within 24 hours of arrest.
    4. No prolonged custody: Continued detention beyond 24 hours requires Magistrate’s authorisation.
    5. Exception: These safeguards under Article 22(1) and 22(2) do not apply to enemy aliens and persons detained under preventive detention laws under Article 22(3).

    What did the recent ruling and precedents establish?

    1. Vihaan Kumar (2025): The Court held that failure to communicate grounds vitiates the arrest.
    2. Arnesh Kumar (2014): Arrest must be the exception for offences carrying up to seven years, not routine.
    3. D.K. Basu (1997): The Court prescribed safeguards including an arrest memo, informing relatives and medical examination to prevent custodial abuse.
    4. Arrest memo: Procedural safeguards require a documented arrest memo.

    What did the Supreme Court Rule in Vihaan Kumar Case?

    The judgment of the Supreme Court of India (Supreme Court) in the case of Vihan Kumar vs. State of Haryana (2025) marked a crucial milestone in protecting the fundamental rights of arrested persons.

    1. Mandatory information about the reasons for arrest: The Supreme Court has made it clear that the person arrested must be informed of the reasons for his arrest immediately. This is
      a fundamental right guaranteed under Article 22(1) of the Constitution.
    2. Arrest is invalid: If the accused is not informed of the reasons for the arrest, the arrest becomes illegal and unconstitutional.
    3. Cancellation of further proceedings: If fundamental rights are violated during the arrest process itself, subsequent remand orders issued by the courts or charge sheets filed by the police cannot rectify that mistake (Vitiated).
    4. Language awareness: The reasons for the arrest should be communicated in a language that the accused understands, and should not be a mere formality.

    Human rights and dignity (Article 21)

    1. Ban on shackles in hospitals: The Supreme Court has strongly condemned the practice of shackles and chains on Vihan Kumar when he was admitted to the hospital due to medical reasons.
    2. Right to Life: The court held that the right to live with dignity is part of Article 21 , and chaining the accused to a hospital bed falls under the category of human rights violation.

    How is preventive detention different?

    1. Without trial: Preventive detention permits custody without a charge to prevent an anticipated act.
    2. Advisory Board: Detention beyond three months requires review by an Advisory Board.
    3. Narrow safeguards: Several ordinary arrest protections under Article 22 do not apply to preventive detention.
    4. Preventive: Unlike ordinary detention, it is not punitive. It is intended to prevent an anticipated act prejudicial to specified interests.
    5. No 24-hour Magistrate requirement under Article 22(3).
    6. Grounds of detention must generally be communicated, subject to non-disclosure in public interest.

    What is the “Golden Triangle”?

    1. Articles 14, 19, 21: Together they form the core of personal liberty jurisprudence.
    2. Maneka Gandhi (1978): Established that a law depriving personal liberty must prescribe a procedure that is just, fair and reasonable.
    3. Article 22: Provides specific procedural safeguards against arbitrary arrest and detention, complementing the broader protection under Article 21.

    Conclusion

    The ruling restates settled safeguards and closes an enforcement gap on communicating arrest grounds. It sharpens the line between lawful arrest and arbitrary detention.

    PYQ Relevance

    [UPSC 2023] “The Constitution of India is a living instrument with capabilities of enormous dynamism. It is a constitution made for a progressive society.” Illustrate with special reference to the expanding horizons of the right to life and personal liberty.

    Linkage: The PYQ examines the expanding scope of the right to life and personal liberty under Article 21. Arrest safeguards and preventive-detention limits show how judicial interpretation strengthens protection against arbitrary deprivation of liberty.

  • Anti-paper-leak law amended amid exam-integrity protests

    Why in the News

    The Public Examination (Prevention of Unfair Means) Amendment Bill, 2026 seeks to strengthen the 2024 law against organised cheating and examination paper leaks amid concerns over NEET and recruitment examination irregularities.

    What is the Public Examination Act, 2024?

    1. Objective: Criminalises organised cheating, paper leaks, impersonation and other unfair means.
    2. Coverage: Applies to major public examinations conducted by bodies such as UPSC, SSC and NTA.
    3. Penalties: Provides imprisonment and heavy fines for organised examination malpractice.
    4. Focus: Targets organised networks rather than genuine candidate errors.

    Why was it amended?

    • Exam-leak crisis: Repeated paper leaks and irregularities exposed weaknesses in examination governance.
    • Enforcement gaps: Strengthening was considered necessary after experience with the 2024 framework.
    • Public trust: Fair examinations are essential for merit-based recruitment and equal opportunity.

    What does the crisis reveal?

    • Aspiration-opportunity gap: Large numbers of candidates compete for limited government jobs.
    • Institutional trust deficit: Repeated leaks undermine confidence in recruitment institutions.
    • Governance challenge: Legal punishment alone cannot ensure examination integrity without secure technology, accountable agencies and speedy investigation.

    Prelims Pointers

    • Act: Public Examinations (Prevention of Unfair Means) Act, 2024
    • Ministry/Department: Department of Personnel and Training
    • Targets: Organised cheating, paper leaks and impersonation
    • Important distinction: The Act does not automatically cover all university or State board examinations unless the concerned government adopts the framework.

    “[2024, GS2, 15] What are the aims and objects of the recently passed and enforced, The Public Examination (Prevention of Unfair Means) Act, 2024? Whether University/State Education Board examinations, too, are covered under the Act?”

    [2021] With reference to the Union Government, consider the following statements:
    1. N. Gopalaswamy Iyengar Committee suggested that a minister and a secretary be designated solely for pursuing the subject of administrative reform and promoting it.
    2. In 1970, the Department of Personnel was constituted on the recommendation of the Administrative Reforms Commission, 1966, and this was placed under the Prime Minister’s charge.
    Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

    [A] 1 only

    [B] 2 only

    [C] Both 1 and 2

    [D] Neither 1 nor 2

  • Parliament clears renaming of Kerala to “Keralam”

    Why in the News

    Both Houses passed a Bill to rename Kerala as “Keralam”, its name in Malayalam. The change follows two resolutions of the Kerala Assembly and routes through the constitutional process for altering a state’s name.

    How is a state renamed under the Constitution?

    1. Parliament’s power: Under Article 3, Parliament can alter the name of a state by law.
    2. Presidential referral: Such a Bill needs the President’s recommendation and the views of the affected state legislature.
    3. Simple majority: The change is passed by ordinary legislative majority, not a constitutional amendment.

    Why “Keralam”?

    1. Linguistic identity: “Keralam” is the state’s name in Malayalam, and the change aligns official usage with local usage.
    2. Assembly resolutions: The Kerala Assembly twice sought the change unanimously.

    Why does the process matter?

    1. Union primacy: Only Parliament, not the state, can effect the legal renaming.
    2. Federal courtesy: The state legislature’s view is sought, but its resolution is not binding.

    Back2Basics: Article 3 of the Constitution

    1. Scope: Formation of new states and alteration of areas, boundaries, or names of existing states.
    2. Initiation: Only on the President’s recommendation, after seeking the state legislature’s views.
    3. Nature: Treated as an ordinary law, reflecting the “indestructible states” feature of Indian federalism.

    “[2022, GS1, 15] The political and administrative reorganization of states and territories has been a continuous ongoing process since the mid-nineteenth century. Discuss with examples.”

    [2025] Consider the following pairs :
    State:Description

    1. Arunachal Pradesh: The capital is named after a fort, and the state has two National Parks
    2. Nagaland: The State came into Existence on the basis of a Constitutional Amendment Act.
    3. Tripura: Initially a Part ‘C’ State, it became a centrally administered territory with the reorganization of State in 1956 and later attained the status of a full-fledged State
    How many of the above pairs are correctly matched?

    [A] Only one

    [B] Only two

    [C] All the three

    [D] None

  • Parliament curbs states’ power to tax minerals

    Why in the News

    Parliament passed the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Amendment Bill, 2026. It bars states from imposing specified levies on mineral rights except on terms set by the Centre, reopening a fiscal federalism dispute.

    What does the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Amendment Bill, 2026 do?

    1. Levy restriction: States cannot impose specified taxes on mineral rights or mineral-bearing land except as the Centre prescribes.
    2. Dues extinguished: Pre-amendment dues estimated near 2 lakh crore rupees stand extinguished.
    3. Scope: The Bill applies to major minerals such as iron ore, coal, bauxite, manganese, and copper.

    Why is this a fiscal federalism flashpoint?

    1. 2024 ruling reversed in effect: The Supreme Court in 2024 upheld states’ power to tax mineral rights, which the Bill now constrains.
    2. Revenue dependence: Mining was 84.9% of Jharkhand’s non-tax revenue in 2024-25.
    3. Mineral-rich states hit: States holding large mineral reserves lose an expected revenue stream.

    What is the Centre’s justification?

    1. Uniform rates: The government argues uniform mineral rates prevent a patchwork of state levies.
    2. No revenue loss claim: The Centre states that states retain powers over minor minerals.
    3. Investment climate: Predictable levies are framed as protecting mining-sector investment.

    What are the major debates surrounding it?

    1. Tax versus royalty: The dispute turns on whether a levy on minerals is a tax or a royalty, which the 2024 ruling addressed.
    2. Tribal concerns: Mineral belts overlap with Scheduled Areas, raising questions of local benefit-sharing.
    3. Divisible resource control: Centralising mineral levies shifts fiscal power toward the Union.

    Conclusion

    The amendment centralises control over mineral taxation soon after the Supreme Court affirmed states’ taxing power. The immediate stage is enactment, with a likely constitutional challenge the next development.

    Back2Basics

    Constitutional Framework Governing mineral taxation

    1. Entry 50, State List: Taxes on mineral rights, subject to Parliament’s limitations relating to mineral development.
    2. Entry 54, Union List: Regulation of mines and mineral development declared expedient in public interest.
    3. Article 246: Distributes legislative power between Union and states via the Seventh Schedule.

    What did the Supreme Court hold in 2024?

    The Mineral Area Development Authority v. SAIL judgment is the constitutional backdrop to the 2026 amendment. The 9-judge Constitution Bench, by 8:1 majority, held that royalty is not a tax and that States have legislative competence to tax mineral rights under Entry 50, State List. It also recognised the States’ power to tax mineral-bearing land under Entry 49, State List.

    • Royalty ≠ Tax: Royalty paid under the MMDR Act is consideration for the right to extract minerals and is distinct from a tax.
    • State Taxing Power: States can impose taxes on mineral rights under Entry 50, List II, subject to limitations imposed by Parliament.
    • Mineral-Bearing Land: States can also levy taxes on land under Entry 49, List II.
    • MMDR Limitation: The Court held that the MMDR Act, as it then stood, did not impose a limitation on the States’ taxing power.

    Why is the 2026 Amendment significant?

    The 2026 amendment seeks to alter this position prospectively by restricting State taxation of mineral rights and mineral-bearing lands, except in accordance with conditions or restrictions prescribed by the Centre

    PYQ Relevance

    [UPSC 2025] Examine the evolving pattern of Centre-State financial relations in the context of planned development in India. How far have the recent reforms impacted the fiscal federalism in India?

    Linkage: The 2025 PYQ examines the evolution of Centre–State financial relations and their impact on fiscal federalism. The Bill raises fresh concerns over the Union’s role in restricting States’ mineral revenue powers and fiscal autonomy.

  • NITI Aayog wants manufacturing to move beyond assembly

    Why in the News?

    A NITI Aayog report titled Key Sectors to Position India as a Global Manufacturing Hub calls for deeper localisation and value addition across four sectors. It argues that India’s manufacturing remains stuck at assembly, with high import dependence for inputs.

    What does the report cover?

    1. Four focus sectors: Chemicals, telecom and networking equipment, textiles, and solar photovoltaic (PV).
    2. Central diagnosis: India assembles finished goods but imports the high-value inputs, capping domestic value addition.

    What are the sector-specific findings?

    1. Chemicals: The industry stood at $200-220 billion in FY25, roughly 3% to 3.5% of the global market, growing 6% to 8%.
    2. Textiles: About 80% of textile and apparel producers are MSMEs, limiting scale and technology adoption.
    3. Import reliance: Around 35% of mono-ethylene glycol, a key textile input, is imported.
    4. Solar PV: Domestic capacity depends on imported cells and wafers.

    Why does deeper localisation matter?

    1. Value capture: Assembly adds little domestic value, so moving up the chain raises incomes and jobs.
    2. Strategic resilience: Import dependence for inputs exposes India to supply shocks and price volatility.
    3. Trade balance: Substituting imported inputs narrows the manufacturing trade deficit.

    What are the challenges to a manufacturing hub strategy

    1. Scale deficit: An MSME-heavy base struggles to achieve globally competitive scale.
    2. Technology gap: Weak research and development limits movement into complex components.
    3. Logistics cost: High freight and power costs erode cost competitiveness.
    4. Skilling shortfall: A shortage of trained industrial labour slows productivity gains.
    5. Input ecosystem: Absence of a domestic supplier base for critical inputs keeps assembly dependent on imports.

    Conclusion

    The report reframes the manufacturing goal from output volume to domestic value addition. Its recommendations depend on building an input-supplier ecosystem, which the Production Linked Incentive (PLI) scheme alone has not delivered.

    Back2Basics

    Government Initiatives for manufacturing

    1. Make in India: Umbrella programme to raise manufacturing’s share of GDP.
    2. Production Linked Incentive (PLI) scheme: Output-linked incentives across 14 sectors.
    3. National Manufacturing Mission: Announced to coordinate sectoral manufacturing push.
    4. MUDRA & Credit Guarantee Scheme: Improve access to institutional credit for MSMEs, supporting investment, expansion and employment generation.
    5. Semicon India Programme: Supports semiconductor fabrication, packaging and related ecosystems to build strategic manufacturing capabilities and reduce import dependence.

    Key Concepts

    Assembly vs. Value Addition

    1. Assembly-led model: Importing components and assembling finished products in India.
    2. Value-added manufacturing: Domestic production of components, intermediate goods, technology and final products.
    3. Key concern: High domestic output does not necessarily mean high domestic value capture.

    China+1 Strategy

    1. Global firms are diversifying supply chains beyond China.
    2. India can leverage this opportunity, but competitive costs, reliable infrastructure and deeper localisation are essential.

    PYQ Relevance

    [UPSC 2025] Discuss the rationale of the Production Linked Incentive (PLI) scheme. What are its achievements? In what way can the functioning and outcomes of the scheme be improved?

    Linkage: The 2025 PYQ examines the role and effectiveness of the PLI scheme in strengthening India’s manufacturing sector. The report highlights the need to move beyond assembly towards deeper localisation, domestic value addition and stronger supplier ecosystems.

  • A predictable rise: retail inflation climbs to a 19-month high

    Why in the News

    Retail inflation rose to 4.45% in July 2026, its highest reading in 19 months. The number stayed above the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) target of 4% for a second straight month, even as the central bank held its policy rate.

    What is the Consumer Price Index (CPI) inflation target framework?

    1. Flexible inflation targeting: The RBI is mandated to keep CPI inflation at 4%, within a tolerance band of 2% to 6%.
    2. Monetary Policy Committee (MPC): A six-member committee sets the repo rate to steer inflation toward that target.
    3. Mandate basis: The framework flows from the amended Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934, and a 2016 agreement between the government and the RBI.

    What is driving the price rise?

    1. Food inflation: Vegetables led the increase, with sharp jumps in onion, garlic and ginger prices.
    2. Fuel and transport: Higher energy costs fed into the headline number.
    3. Rural stress: Rural food inflation ran ahead of the national average.
    4. Imported pressure: A depreciating rupee and disrupted West Asian crude supply raised input costs.

    Why does core inflation tell a calmer story?

    1. Core below 3%: Inflation excluding food and fuel stayed under 3%, showing weak underlying demand pressure.
    2. Divergence: The gap between headline and core inflation points to a supply-side food shock rather than broad overheating.

    Why did the RBI hold the repo rate?

    1. Rate on hold: The MPC kept the repo rate at 5.25% for a fourth straight meeting.
    2. Balancing act: A food-driven spike is not easily controlled by interest rates, so the RBI avoided tightening into a supply shock.

    Conclusion

    Headline inflation is being pushed by food and fuel, not by demand. The RBI has chosen to hold rates, and the trajectory depends on whether the monsoon eases vegetable prices in the coming months.

    Back2Basics

    What is Fiscal versus Monetary control of inflation?

    1. Monetary tools: Repo rate, cash reserve ratio, and open market operations, used by the RBI to manage demand-side inflation.
    2. Fiscal and supply tools: Buffer stocks, import duty cuts, and export curbs, used by the government to tackle food-supply shocks.

    Types of Inflation

    1. Headline Inflation: Overall CPI inflation, including food and fuel.
    2. Core Inflation: Inflation excluding volatile food and fuel prices.
    3. Food Inflation: Rise in prices of food items such as cereals, vegetables, pulses and edible oils.
    4. Demand-Pull Inflation: Caused by aggregate demand growing faster than supply.
    5. Cost-Push Inflation: Results from rising input costs such as fuel, wages and raw materials.
    6. Imported Inflation: Domestic prices rise due to higher global commodity prices or currency depreciation.
    7. Built-in Inflation: Persistent inflation arising from wage-price expectations and indexation.

    Why Food Inflation Matters in India

    1. Policy Challenge: Food inflation is largely supply-driven, limiting the effectiveness of monetary policy alone.
    2. High CPI Weight: Food has a large weight in the CPI basket, making food-price changes strongly influence headline inflation.
    3. Household Impact: Food inflation directly erodes purchasing power, especially for low-income households.
    4. Rural Vulnerability: Rural households spend a larger share of income on food, making them more exposed to food-price shocks.
    5. Inflation Expectations: Persistent food inflation can raise wage and price expectations, creating second-round effects. (Secod Round Effect: Persistent food inflation can spill over into wages, input costs and inflation expectations, turning a temporary supply shock into broader inflation.)

    PYQ Relevance

    [UPSC 2024] What are the causes of persistent high food inflation in India? Comment on the effectiveness of the monetary policy of the RBI to control this type of inflation.

    Linkage: The PYQ talks about food inflation and limits of RBI monetary policy. Current inflation shows how supply-side food shocks can persist despite subdued core inflation.

  • NASA invites ISRO to join the Moon Base programme

    Why in the news?

    The National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) has asked the Indian Space Research Organisation (ISRO) to join its Moon Base programme, a project to establish a permanent research station on the Moon. The offer exposes a tension between the chance to accelerate ISRO’s own crewed-mission goals and the risk of locking India into another agency’s technology ecosystem. Space cooperation has continued to progress even amid the volatility of India-US relations.

    What is the Moon Base programme?

    1. About: An ambitious project to establish a permanent research station on the Moon where astronauts can live, work, and carry out experiments for extended periods.
    2. Sequence: It is the logical follow-up to landing humans on the Moon, aimed at preparing the ground for longer stays.

    What is the Artemis programme?

    1. About: A US-led programme that aims to land humans on the Moon before 2028, the first crewed return since 1972.
    2. Purpose: It is spearheaded by the United States and is designed to move faster and more efficiently by bringing in partner countries and private companies.

    What are the Artemis Accords?

    1. About: A US-led coalition of spacefaring countries setting principles for cooperative and sustainable lunar exploration, which India has already signed.
    2. Contested feature: The Accords sidestep and seek to replace the 1979 Moon Agreement, a framework for multilateral governance of lunar resources.

    What is the 1979 Moon Agreement?

    1. About: An international agreement that seeks to develop a multilateral governance framework for the use of lunar resources.
    2. Relevance: The Artemis Accords are seen as an alternative that the Moon Agreement’s supporters view as bypassing multilateral governance.

    What does India gain from joining?

    1. Crewed-mission experience: ISRO, which plans to land humans on the Moon by 2040, would gain hands-on experience in executing complex crewed missions.
    2. Technology access: Participation offers access to technologies relevant to sustained lunar operations.
    3. Existing commitments: India has signed the Artemis Accords and agreed with the US to develop a strategic framework for human spaceflight cooperation.
    4. Strategic stakes: Over coming decades the Moon could become strategically and economically important as countries begin to extract lunar resources.

    What are the risks of joining? (the central tension)

    1. US-led alliance perception: The Artemis Accords are increasingly seen as a US-led alliance, and two major space powers, China and Russia, are not part of it.
    2. Technology lock-in: It is important that ISRO does not get locked into NASA’s technology ecosystem, which would make it vulnerable to technology denial.
    3. Goal displacement: Cooperation should help ISRO achieve its own goals faster, not lead it to abandon or delay them in the service of someone else’s goals.
    4. Wariness of structures: India has been wary of joining such international structures, and signing the Accords already represented a choice.

    Government Initiatives in the Space Sector

    1. Gaganyaan: India’s human spaceflight programme to send astronauts to low-Earth orbit.
    2. Bharatiya Antariksh Station: India’s planned space station for sustained microgravity research.
    3. IN-SPACe: The body enabling private participation in the space sector.

    Challenges for India’s Lunar Cooperation

    1. Technology denial: Dependence on foreign systems risks future denial.
    2. Alliance optics: Alignment with a US-led coalition affects ties with other space powers.
    3. Governance gap: Competing frameworks leave lunar resource rules unsettled.
    4. Cost and capability: Crewed deep-space missions demand large, sustained investment.
    5. Autonomy risk: Partner timelines may divert ISRO from its own priorities.

    “[2025] Consider the following space missions:

    I. Axiom-4

    II. SpaDeX

    III. Gaganyaan

    How many of the space missions given above encourage and support microgravity research?

    (a) Only one

    (b) Only two

    (c) All the three

    (d) None

  • What psychiatric genetics can and cannot tell an Indian family

    Why in the news?

    Families of patients with psychiatric illness increasingly ask whether the condition is in their blood and whether a genetic test can settle their child’s future. There is a tension between the real progress of psychiatric genetics and its limited power to predict individual outcomes, especially for Indian populations underrepresented in genomic databases. The central point is that genes load the dice but do not determine destiny.

    What is a genome-wide association study (GWAS)?

    1. About: A GWAS compares millions of common genetic variants across very large groups of people with and without a condition, to find variants that appear more often in one group. . It compares DNA markers, most often single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs, between individuals with a condition and healthy control groups.
    2. What it yields: It behaves like a satellite map highlighting genomic areas of interest, showing where to look for biological mechanisms rather than pinpointing a cause.

    What does polygenic risk mean?

    1. About: In common psychiatric disorders no single gene variant has a large effect, unlike single-gene diseases such as Tay-Sachs disease or Duchenne muscular dystrophy.
    2. Mechanism: Risk is polygenic, emerging from the combined influence of thousands of variants together with rare genetic changes, development, environment, and chance.

    What is a polygenic risk score?

    1. About: A polygenic risk score (PRS) compresses many small genetic effects into a single number meant to estimate a person’s inherited susceptibility.
    2. Limits: It cannot say whether a person will become ill, at what age, how severe it will be, or which medicine will work, because it captures only part of genetic liability.

    How Polygenic Risk Works

    1. Many small changes: Instead of one major gene causing an illness (like in cystic fibrosis), polygenic conditions involve hundreds or thousands of tiny DNA changes called single nucleotide polymorphisms
    2. Adding it up: Each individual variant adds or subtracts a tiny amount of risk; a PRS totals these up to estimate your overall genetic predisposition.
    3. Common conditions: It applies to complex diseases like heart disease, type 2 diabetes, schizophrenia, and certain common cancers

    What have the major GWAS findings shown?

    1. Schizophrenia: A 2022 landmark study identified associations at 287 genomic regions and pointed to genes active in neurons and synapses.
    2. Bipolar disorder: A large 2021 study identified 64 associated regions.
    3. Regulatory signals: Many signals lie in DNA that regulates when and where genes switch on, not in stretches that directly encode a protein.
    4. Shared risk: A December 2025 study in Nature reported that some inherited risk is shared across schizophrenia and bipolar disorder.

    Why is prediction unreliable, especially in India?

    1. Score does not contain life: A person with a higher score may remain well while a person with a lower score may fall ill, because the score does not contain childhood adversity, sleep disruption, substance use, medical illness, or access to care.
    2. Expert caution: The International Society of Psychiatric Genetics has cautioned that current scores for schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and depression are not accurate enough for routine clinical prediction.
    3. Ancestry bias: Genomic databases have drawn disproportionately from people of European ancestry, so scores are often less accurate in other populations.
    4. Indian diversity: The GenomeIndia project generated whole-genome data from 10,000 healthy, unrelated Indians across 83 population groups and documented extraordinary genetic diversity, so a score developed elsewhere cannot simply be imported.

    What can genetics usefully change in the clinic today?

    1. Reduces blame: A mother did not cause schizophrenia by being too strict and a father did not transmit bipolar disorder through a moral failing, and biology matters.
    2. Avoids fatalism: Genetic vulnerability should not be converted into a verdict, and no test can declare a person safe or doomed.
    3. Focus on modifiable risk: The useful approach is to track early warning signs, avoid intoxicants, sleep well, seek help promptly, and focus on recovery.
    4. Visible risks: Many risks are visible without sequencing, such as lost sleep before a manic episode, escalating cannabis use, treatment stopped due to stigma, and distance from specialist care.

    Conclusion

    The central idea is that psychiatric genetics will not identify people before they fall ill, but it can replace superstition and blame with a more accurate account of vulnerability. Prediction will remain probabilistic even as datasets grow larger and more representative. The task is to keep probabilities from being misunderstood, stigmatised, or commercialised, and to involve diverse populations while protecting privacy.

    Back2Basics:

    GenomeIndia Project

    1. Convening body: Funded by the Department of Biotechnology (DBT), Government of India.
    2. Aim: To build a catalogue of the genetic diversity of the Indian population.
    3. Scale: Generated whole-genome data from 10,000 healthy, unrelated Indians across 83 population groups.
    4. Significance: Provides an India-specific reference against which imported genetic risk scores can be tested rather than assumed to apply.

    Genomics in India: About

    1. Definition: Genomics studies the complete set of an organism’s DNA, including how variants relate to disease.
    2. Diversity: India’s population carries extraordinary genetic diversity across many groups, making a single national reference essential.
    3. Clinical caution: Risk scores derived from European-ancestry datasets can mislead when applied to Indian populations.

    Challenges in Psychiatric Genetics

    1. Weak prediction: Scores cannot forecast onset, severity, or treatment response for an individual.
    2. Ancestry gaps: European-dominated databases reduce accuracy elsewhere.
    3. Commercial overreach: Enthusiasm of commerce can outrun the science.
    4. Privacy risk: Genomic data raises serious privacy and consent concerns.
    5. Stigma: Misread probabilities can label people as patients-in-waiting.

    Way Forward

    1. Diversify datasets: Include diverse populations in genomic research.
    2. Community involvement: Involve clinicians and communities in deciding how data are used.
    3. Protect privacy: Enforce strong safeguards on genomic data.
    4. Integrate data: Combine genetic findings with developmental, clinical, and environmental information.

    PYQ Relevance

    [UPSC 2026] Which of the following statements with regard to Genome India Project is/are correct?

    1. It is a part of the Human Genome Project.

    2. The project is funded by the Department of Biotechnology (DBT), Government of India.

    3. Its primary aim is to build a catalogue of genetic diversity of the Indian population.

    (a) 1 only

    (b) 2 and 3 only

    (c) 1 and 2 only

    (d) 1, 2 and 3

  • Parliament passes National Co-operative Development Corporation (Amendment) Bill, 2026

    Why in the News?

    Parliament passed the National Cooperative Development Corporation (Amendment) Bill, 2026, enabling the NCDC to provide loans and grants directly to cooperative societies.

    What is NCDC?

    • NCDC (National Cooperative Development Corporation) is a statutory corporation established under the National Cooperative Development Corporation Act, 1962.
    • Functions under the Ministry of Cooperation.
    • Promotes and finances cooperatives involved in production, processing, marketing, storage and trade of agricultural and allied produce.

    What does the Amendment Change?

    • Direct lending: NCDC can directly provide loans and grants to cooperative societies.
    • Wider coverage: Definition of foodstuffs expanded to include processed food and other food items notified by the Centre.
    • No additional budgetary outlay: The Bill does not provide for additional government financial assistance.

    Why is it Needed?

    • Faster flow of credit by removing intermediary delays.
    • Supports over 8 lakh cooperatives with more than 30 crore members.
    • Extends cooperative financing into value added food chains.

    Why are States Concerned?

    • Cooperation is largely a State subject.
    • Direct central lending may bypass State governments and registrars.
    • Raises concerns about cooperative federalism and centralisation.

    Key Challenges

    • Financial weakness and poor governance of PACS (Primary Agricultural Credit Societies).
    • Dual regulatory control.
    • Regional concentration of cooperatives.
    • Delayed elections and audits.
    • Limited professional management.
    • Centre State friction.

    Constitutional Framework

    • Entry 32, State List: Incorporation and regulation of cooperative societies within a State.
    • Article 43B: Promotes voluntary formation and autonomous functioning of cooperatives.
    • Part IXB, Articles 243ZH to 243ZT: Constitutional provisions on cooperatives.
    • Multi State Cooperative Societies Act, 2002: Governs cooperatives operating across multiple States.