Mains Ready By December. Smash Mains & Smash PYQ Admissions Open
Talk to Mentor

Civilsdaily

GS Paper: GS2-01.Indian Constitution-Historical underpinnings & evolution; Features, amendments, significant provisions, basic structure of Constitution

  • Why the Supreme Court upheld the constitutional validity of the UP Madarsa Act, 2004?

    Why in the News?

    The Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of the Uttar Pradesh Board of Madarsa Education Act, 2004 (Madarsa Act), except for the provisions related to higher education.

    What were the grounds for the SCt’s decision to uphold the UP Madarsa Act?

    • Applicability of Basic Structure Doctrine: The Supreme Court clarified that the basic structure doctrine, which is typically applied to constitutional amendments, does not apply to ordinary legislation like the Madarsa Act.
      • The court emphasized that a law can only be struck down for violating fundamental rights or legislative competence, not for infringing on the basic structure of the Constitution.
    • State Regulation of Education: The court affirmed that states have the authority to regulate educational institutions, including madrasas, as long as such regulations are reasonable and do not infringe on minority rights.
    • Right to Education: The Supreme Court referenced its previous rulings regarding minority institutions’ rights to provide religious education while managing their administration.
      • It concluded that the Madrasa Act does not violate the right to free and compulsory education under Article 21A, as it allows madrasas to offer religious instruction alongside secular education.

    About Uttar Pradesh Board of Madarsa Education Act, 2004 (Madarsa Act):

    • The Uttar Pradesh Board of Madrasas Education Act, 2004 (Madarsa Act) provides a legal framework for the operation and regulation of madrasas in the state.
    • It aims to standardize education in these institutions by integrating both religious and secular curricula, primarily following the National Council of Educational Research and Training (NCERT) guidelines.
    • The Act established the Uttar Pradesh Board of Madarsa Education, which is responsible for preparing course materials, conducting examinations, and overseeing educational standards from the ‘Maulvi’ level (equivalent to Class 10) to ‘Fazil’ (equivalent to a Master’s degree).

    How does this ruling affect the regulation of madrasa education and its alignment with secular principles?

    • Regulation of Madarsa Education: The ruling empowers the state to regulate madarsa education, ensuring that it meets certain standards without compromising its religious identity.
      • It ensures that madrasas can continue to provide Islamic education alongside secular subjects, but within a structured and monitored environment that does not undermine the state’s authority over educational standards.
    • Alignment with Secularism: The SC’s judgment does not force madrasas to secularize completely. Instead, it recognizes the coexistence of religious and secular education within the institution’s framework, reflecting India’s constitutional commitment to religious freedom and secularism.
      • By upholding the law, the SC suggested that the government can promote secular education while respecting the rights of minority institutions to impart religious education.

    Implications of Striking Down Higher Education Provisions:

    • Conflict with the University Grants Commission (UGC) Act: The SC struck down provisions that allowed the Madarsa Board to grant higher education degrees (such as Kamil and Fazil), ruling that such powers conflicted with the UGC Act, which reserves the authority to grant degrees to universities recognized under central or state law.
      • This decision limits Madarsas’ ability to independently issue degrees for advanced religious education.
    • Impact on Madarsa Students: Students seeking degrees like Kamil (bachelor’s equivalent) or Fazil (master’s equivalent) from Madarsas will no longer receive these credentials through the Madarsa Board.
      • This may affect the formal recognition of madrasa graduates, limiting their ability to pursue higher education or professional opportunities that require university-recognized degrees.
    • Alignment with National Educational Standards: The SC’s decision brings madrasas in line with the UGC Act, ensuring that degree-awarding powers are centralized within recognized institutions. This promotes uniformity and compatibility with the broader national education system.

    Way forward: 

    • Collaborate with Recognized Universities: Madarsas can partner with recognized universities to offer degrees for advanced religious studies, ensuring compliance with the UGC Act while retaining the essence of religious education.
    • Integrate Secular and Religious Education Standards: To enhance educational outcomes, the government could provide support for curriculum development in madrasas, balancing religious teachings with secular subjects in alignment with national educational standards.

    Mains PYQ:

    Q The Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009 remains inadequate in promoting an incentive-based system for children’s education without generating awareness about the importance of schooling. Analyse. (UPSC IAS/2022)

  • Not all private property is ‘material resource of community’ for redistribution: Unpacking the SC verdict

    Why in the News?

    A  9-judge Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court, in a majority judgment (8:1), held that not every private resource can be considered a ‘material resource of the community’ to be used by the government to serve the ‘common good’ under Article 39(b).

    • This overturns the earlier interpretation formed in 1977 that has been followed by the Supreme Court till 1997.

    What are Constitutional Provisions?

    • Part IV of the Constitution contains the Directive Principles of State Policy (DPSP) where government should strive to achieve social and economic justice in our society.
    • Article 39(b) in Part IV provides that ‘ownership and control of material resources of the community are so distributed as best to subserve the common good.’
    • Articles 19(1)(f) and 31 originally guaranteed right to property and compensation for acquisition as a Fundamental Right respectively.
      • Article 31C that was added through the 25th amendment in 1971, provided an exception that laws made to fulfil the principles under Articles 39(b) and (c) shall not be void on the ground that it violated Fundamental Rights including right to property.
    • In the Kesavananda Bharati case (1973), a 13-judge Bench of the Supreme Court upheld the validity of Article 31C but made it subject to judicial review.
    • In 1978, the right to property was omitted from Fundamental Rights and made a constitutional right under Article 300A.
      • Any law to acquire private property by the government should only be for a public purpose with adequate compensation meted out.

    What were earlier judgments?

    • In the State of Karnataka vs. Ranganatha Reddy (1977) case, the Supreme Court upheld a law nationalizing private bus services, with Justice V.R. Krishna Iyer interpreting “material resource of the community” in Article 39(b) to include all national wealth.
    • This minority opinion influenced the Sanjeev Coke Manufacturing Company vs. Bharat Coking Coal Limited (1982) case, which also supported nationalization, and was referenced in Mafatlal Industries Limited vs. Union of India (1996).

    What is the current ruling?

    • The SC recently ruled in the Property Owners Association vs. State of Maharashtra case that not all privately owned properties qualify as “material resources of the community” under Article 39(b).
    • A 9 judge bench, stated that only certain properties, based on their nature and impact on public welfare, can be considered for state acquisition to serve the common good.
    • This decision marks a shift from earlier interpretations that emphasized that individual property rights are protected and not every private asset can be appropriated by the state.
    • The ruling also noted that the term “distribution” in Article 39(b) includes both state acquisition and redistribution to private entities when it benefits the community.

    What criteria should determine if a privately owned resource qualifies as a ‘material resource of the community’?

    • Purpose and Public Utility: Privately owned resources may be classified as “material resources of the community” if they are essential for societal welfare, addressing collective needs, or fulfilling significant public purposes, such as energy, water, or land critical for infrastructure.
    • Proportionality and Fairness: The court emphasized that any state action must be proportional, balancing public benefit with the impact on private owners.
    • Economic Impact and Control: Resources that substantially impact the national economy or are crucial for maintaining societal equity (such as natural resources) may be considered community resources, but this does not apply to general private property.

    How does this ruling impact the balance between individual property rights and the state’s ability to intervene for public welfare?

    • This ruling reinforces individual property rights, clarifying that private property cannot be arbitrarily acquired under the guise of benefiting society. The state must justify the acquisition based on substantial, verifiable public welfare needs.
    • Limitations on State Power: By rejecting an expansive interpretation of Article 39(b), the court limits state power, ensuring that only properties directly tied to public interest and welfare fall under this category.

    What are the potential economic implications of this ruling in India?

    • Investment Climate: This ruling strengthens protections for private property, likely improving investor confidence by assuring that property rights are safeguarded from excessive state intervention.
    • Economic Development and Social Equity: By narrowing the scope of Article 39(b), the ruling limits redistributive policies to sectors where public welfare is a clear priority, allowing economic resources to be distributed in a manner that considers social equity while respecting individual rights.
    • Real Estate and Industrial Sectors: The ruling could positively affect sectors with high-value assets, such as real estate and industry, as businesses will have greater certainty regarding property ownership and security.

    How might this decision influence future legal interpretations and legislative actions?

    • Refined Scope for Article 39(b) Applications: Future legislation under Article 39(b) must specifically justify how resources qualify as “material resources of the community,” likely limiting nationalization or acquisition to specific, strategically important sectors.
    • Increased Judicial Scrutiny on Property Rights: Courts are likely to more critically evaluate state actions that aim to redistribute private property, requiring robust evidence of public interest and alignment with constitutional principles.
    • Potential for Policy Revisions: Laws that invoke Article 39(b) and related provisions may need to be reviewed to ensure they comply with this interpretation, leading to a more nuanced application of public welfare policies.

    Way forward: 

    • Establish Clear Guidelines for Public Interest Acquisition: The government should define transparent criteria for categorizing “material resources of the community,” ensuring acquisitions serve substantial public welfare needs and align with societal priorities, especially in areas like infrastructure and essential services.
    • Strengthen Judicial and Legislative Safeguards: Introduce legal safeguards to protect individual property rights, allowing courts to rigorously assess state actions on property acquisition, ensuring proportionality, fairness, and adherence to constitutional principles.

    Mains PYQ:

    Q How did land reforms in some parts of the country help to improve the socio-economic conditions of marginal and small farmers? (UPSC IAS/2021)

  • Why India is at risk of becoming a ‘diminishing democracy’

    Why in the News?

    In her book “Democracy on Trial: Majoritarianism and Dissent in India”, Zoya Hasan points out that, though India’s democracy is strong in elections, it has struggled with fairness and freedoms due to growing majoritarianism since 2014.

    What factors contribute to the erosion of civil liberties in India?

    • Majoritarian Politics: Since a decade ago, India’s democracy has seen a shift toward majoritarianism, with the rights of minorities, particularly Muslims, facing marginalization.
      • This tilt toward majoritarian views fosters unequal treatment, weakening the universal protection of civil liberties and undermining the democratic principles of inclusion and equality.
    • Compromised Media Landscape: Traditionally, media acted as a watchdog on power, but now it frequently functions as a government advocate.
      • This shift has narrowed public discourse on civil rights and accountability, reducing the media’s role in preserving civil liberties.
    • Legislation Targeting Minorities: Laws such as the Citizenship (Amendment) Act (CAA) are seen as religiously discriminatory, especially when considered with the National Register of Citizens (NRC).
      • Such laws challenge the Constitution’s guarantee of equal rights for all citizens, placing undue pressure on certain communities and further eroding civil liberties.

    Role of Political Institutions in Undermining Democracy:

    • Judicial Autonomy and its Challenges: While the judiciary has traditionally been a pillar of democracy, recent trends indicate compromised judicial independence.
      • There are instances where courts appear reluctant to challenge the executive because political pressure may be impacting judicial autonomy, thereby diminishing an essential check on power.
    • Media’s Decline as a Check on Power: Media independence has weakened as corporate and political influences have taken root, limiting its role in holding power to account.
    • Legislative and Executive Power Dynamics: The increasing concentration of power within the executive, combined with a legislative body that often aligns with the ruling agenda, limits checks and balances.

    Impact of Political Polarization on Democratic Processes:

    • Divisive Identity Politics: Identity-based polarization is intensifying, with significant events such as the Ayodhya dispute and the Shaheen Bagh protests illustrating how political narratives can frame majority identities against minority rights.
    • Silencing of Dissent: Governmental responses to protests, like those against the CAA, often include the use of force, indicating reduced tolerance for opposition.

    Steps taken by the Election Commission of India:

    • Voter Education and Awareness Campaigns: The ECI has launched extensive voter education campaigns to promote awareness about the electoral process, emphasizing the importance of informed voting.
    • Monitoring and Regulation of Political Parties: The ECI has increased scrutiny over political parties’ funding and activities to ensure transparency.
    • Strengthening Electoral Laws: Recent amendments to electoral laws have been made to enhance the integrity of elections.
    • Use of Technology: The ECI has implemented technology-driven solutions such as Electronic Voting Machines (EVMs) and Voter Verified Paper Audit Trails (VVPATs) to ensure transparency and reliability in the voting process.

    Way forward: 

    • Strengthening Institutional Independence: Reinforce the autonomy of key institutions like the judiciary, media, and law enforcement through stricter legal safeguards and transparent appointment processes.
    • Promoting Inclusive and Balanced Governance: Establish mechanisms to ensure equal representation and protection for all communities, addressing grievances through impartial review processes. Implementing inclusive governance policies can help counter majoritarian biases and foster a more cohesive democratic environment.

    Mains PYQ:

    Q To enhance the quality of democracy in India the Election Commission of India has proposed electoral reforms in 2016. What are the suggested reforms and how far are they significant to make democracy successful? (UPSC IAS/2017)

  • [26th October 2024] The Hindu Op-ed: Sharpen the anti-defection law, strengthen democracy

    PYQ Relevance:

    Q) The role of individual MPs (Members of Parliament) has diminished over the years and as a result healthy constructive debates on policy issues are not usually witnessed. How far can this be attributed to the anti-defection law, which was legislated but with a different intention? (UPSC CSE 2013)

    Q) The Individual Parliamentarian’s role as the national lawmaker is on a decline, which in turn, has adversely impacted the quality of debates and their outcome. Discuss. (UPSC CSE 2019)

    Q) To what extent, in your view, the Parliament can ensure accountability of the executive in India? (UPSC CSE 2021)

    Prelims:
    Which one of the following Schedules of the Constitution of India contains provisions regarding anti-defection? (UPSC CSE 2014)
    a)  Second Schedule
    b)  Fifth Schedule
    c)  Eighth Schedule
    d)  Tenth Schedule

    Mentor’s Comment:  The Anti-defection law (10th Schedule) was introduced to maintain political stability and uphold the electoral mandate by discouraging party-hopping among elected representatives. However, its effectiveness has been compromised due to several loopholes and implementation challenges.

    Today’s editorial emphasizes the need for reforms to the anti-defection law in India. It argues that these reforms are essential to enhance the integrity of the democratic process and align with the government’s initiative of “One Nation, One Election” (ONOE).

    _

    Let’s learn!

    Why in the News?

    The Anti-Defection Law is in the news due to a SC’s directive for the Maharashtra Legislative Assembly Speaker to resolve disqualification petitions by December 31, 2023.

    • Additionally, there are growing discussions about the law’s effectiveness and calls for reforms, as critics argue it restricts legislators’ freedom of expression and accountability to constituents.
    • The debate highlights the need for a balance between party discipline and democratic representation.
    What is the Significance of the Anti-Defection Law?

    • Government Stability: It prevents political defections that can lead to governmental instability, ensuring a consistent ruling party.
    • Upholding Electoral Mandates: The law helps maintain the will of the electorate by discouraging elected representatives from abandoning their parties post-election.
    • Party Discipline: It fosters unity within political parties by requiring members to adhere to party directives, especially during critical votes.
    • Reduced Corruption: The law helps reduce corruption and promotes accountability among politicians by curbing defections motivated by personal gain.
    • Legal Framework for Disqualification: The law provides clear grounds for disqualifying members who defect, ensuring a systematic approach to addressing defections.

    How does the current Anti-Defection Law undermine Democratic Representation?

    • Restriction on Freedom of Expression: Elected representatives are often forced to vote along party lines, limiting their ability to express dissent or represent their constituents’ views.
    • Ambiguity in Disqualification: The lack of a clear timeline for resolving defection cases can lead to bias and manipulation, complicating accountability and representation.
    • Exploitable Loopholes: Provisions allowing groups of legislators to defect without penalty can encourage opportunistic behaviour, undermining political integrity.
    • Stifling Legislative Debate: Strict adherence to party lines diminishes robust debate, preventing diverse perspectives on critical issues from being voiced. 

    What are the proposed Amendments?

    Two key amendments to the Tenth Schedule of the Indian Constitution:

    • Time Frame for Decisions: Need to establish a four-week deadline for Speakers or Chairpersons to resolve defection cases. If no decision is made within this period, defecting members should be automatically disqualified.
    • Public Notice of Party Whips: Need to Implement a transparent framework for issuing party whips, such as publishing them in newspapers or using electronic communication. This would ensure that all members are adequately informed about party positions.

    Conclusion: India’s anti-defection legislation underscores the necessity of adapting legal frameworks to contemporary political realities to preserve democracy’s integrity and functionality. By addressing existing gaps in the law, India can foster a more robust democratic environment conducive to effective governance and public trust.

  • Madarsa Education Act: SC reserves order on appeals against Allahabad HC’s ‘Unconstitutional’ verdict

    Why in the News?

    The Supreme Court reserved its decision on appeals challenging the Allahabad HC’s verdict, which declared the Uttar Pradesh Board of Madarsa Education Act, 2004 as ‘Unconstitutional’.

    What is the UP Madarsa Education Act of 2004?

    • The UP Board of Madarsa Education Act, 2004, was enacted to establish a regulatory framework for madrasas in the state.
    • Aim: To ensure the delivery of quality education in these institutions while aligning them with constitutional principles.
    • Key Provisions: The Act set up the Uttar Pradesh Board of Madarsa Education, responsible for prescribing curricula, conducting examinations, and certifying students in registered madrasas.
    • State Involvement: It allowed the government to provide grants, regulate the functioning of madrasas, and inspect their adherence to standards, ensuring uniformity and compliance with educational norms.

    On what grounds did the Allahabad HC declare the Madarsa Act as ‘Unconstitutional’?

    • Violation of Secularism: The Allahabad High Court ruled that the Act violated the principle of secularism, which is a fundamental aspect of the Indian Constitution.
      • The court held that the state’s direct involvement in the administration and funding of religious institutions like madrasas contradicted the secular character enshrined in the Constitution.
    • Equality Before Law: The Act was also found to contravene Article 14, which ensures equality before the law.
      • The court noted that providing special educational arrangements for madrasas amounted to favoring a particular religious community, which was deemed discriminatory against others.

    What are the key arguments on the Constitutionality of the Madarsa Education Act before the SC?

    • For the Act’s Constitutionality:
      • Promoting Educational Rights: Petitioners argued that the Act was intended to improve the quality of education in madrasas by incorporating modern subjects, thereby fulfilling the state’s obligation under Article 21A (Right to Education).
      • Minority Rights Protection: They contended that the Act safeguarded the rights of religious and linguistic minorities to establish and administer educational institutions of their choice under Article 30.
    • Against the Act’s Constitutionality:
      • State Involvement in Religious Education: Critics argued that the state’s involvement in regulating and funding madrasas blurred the line between state and religion, thus it leads to violating the secular framework.
      • Discriminatory Approach: It was contended that the Act granted privileges to one community’s educational institutions, potentially discriminating against others.
      • Alternative Educational Models: The state’s direct regulation of madrasas was seen as unnecessary when secular education could be provided through other existing educational frameworks.

    What are the wider Implications of the SC’s decision on the Madarsa Education Act?

    • Impact on Minority Educational Rights: If the Supreme Court upholds the Act, it may strengthen the right of minorities to receive state support for their educational institutions.
      • Conversely, striking down the Act could set a precedent for limiting state involvement in religious institutions.
    • Revisiting the Secularism Principle: The ruling could lead to a reassessment of how secularism is interpreted, particularly concerning state interactions with minority educational institutions.
    • Implications for Other Religious Schools: The judgment could have broader ramifications for other religious institutions that receive government aid or regulation, potentially prompting similar legal challenges.
    • Integration of Madrasas into Mainstream Education: If the Act is declared unconstitutional, the state may need to find alternative ways to integrate madrasa students into the formal educational system without compromising on their cultural and religious needs.

    What reforms are necessary to modernize madrasa education and address public perceptions?

    • Curriculum Integration: Need to introduce a balanced curriculum that combines religious studies with modern subjects like science, mathematics, and social studies to make madrasa education more holistic and aligned with mainstream education standards.
    • Teacher Training and Certification: Ensure that madrasa teachers receive proper training in contemporary pedagogy and modern subjects.
    • Infrastructure Development: Improve madrasa facilities to provide a conducive learning environment. This includes better classrooms, libraries, laboratories, and access to technology for digital learning.
    • Monitoring and Evaluation: Establish a framework to regularly assess and monitor the quality of education in madrasas.
    • Vocational and Skill-Based Training: Incorporate vocational courses and skill development programs to equip students with practical skills that can improve their employability.
    • Awareness Programs: Need to run awareness campaigns to inform the community about the value of modernizing madrasa education.

    Way forward: 

    • Reform the Act to Align with Secular Principles: Amend the Act to focus on educational standards without direct state involvement in religious affairs, ensuring compliance with constitutional values of secularism and equality.
    • Promote Inclusive Educational Models: Integrate madrasa education into the mainstream system by introducing modern subjects while respecting cultural and religious contexts, allowing students to benefit from both secular and religious education.

    Back2Basics: Minority Educational Institutions in India:

    Details
    Constitutional Provision Article 30(1) of the Constitution of India grants linguistic and religious minorities the right to establish and administer educational institutions of their choice.
    Legislative Framework National Commission for Minority Educational Institutions Act, 2004 safeguards the educational rights of minorities as per Article 30(1).
    Definition A “Minority Educational Institution” is defined as a college or institution established or maintained by a person or group from amongst the minorities (Section 2(g) of the Act).
    Judicial Precedent In T.M.A. Pai Foundation vs. State of Karnataka (2002), the Supreme Court ruled that minority status is determined by state demographics, not national population.
    Rights of Minority Institutions Article 29 protects the interests of minorities by allowing them to conserve their distinct language, script, or culture.

    • Minority institutions do not have an absolute right to appoint staff;
    • This was upheld in the context of the West Bengal Madrasah Service Commission Act, 2008.
    Recognized Minority Communities Muslims, Sikhs, Christians, Buddhists, Jains, and Zoroastrians (Parsis) are recognized as minority communities under the National Commission for Minorities Act of 1992.
    Significance Minority educational institutions play a crucial role in preserving the cultural and linguistic heritage of minority communities while providing access to education.

    Mains PYQ:

    Q National Education Policy 2020 conforms with the Sustainable Development Goal-4 (2030). It intends to restructure and reorient the education system in India. Critically examine the statement. (UPSC IAS/2020)

  • Secularism is a core part of the Constitution: SC

    Why in the News?

    On Monday, October 21, 2024, the Supreme Court affirmed that secularism is an integral and fundamental component of the Basic Structure of the Constitution.

    Is Secularism an Unamendable Part of the Indian Constitution?

    • Part of the Basic Structure: The Supreme Court has consistently held that secularism is an essential and indelible part of the Basic Structure of the Indian Constitution. This means that even though the Preamble was amended in 1976 to include the word “secular,” the principles of secularism were considered inherent in the Constitution from the start.
    • Kesavananda Bharati Case (1973): The landmark judgment established the “Basic Structure Doctrine,” which states that certain fundamental features of the Constitution cannot be altered or destroyed through amendments. Secularism, along with democracy, rule of law, and judicial review, was deemed a part of this unamendable structure.
    • Equality and Fraternity: The right to equality (Article 14) and the emphasis on fraternity in the Constitution have been interpreted by the judiciary to embody secularism as a core value, ensuring the protection of all religions and the principle of state neutrality in religious matters.
    • Indira Gandhi’s 42nd Amendment (1976): The amendment officially added the term “secular” to the Preamble, though the court’s view is that secularism was always implicitly present in the spirit of the Constitution.

    How Does Indian Secularism Differ from Western Models?

    • Equal Respect for All Religions (Sarva Dharma Sambhava): Indian secularism emphasizes the equal respect and treatment of all religions, rather than the strict separation of religion and state seen in Western secular models.
    • State Intervention for Social Reform: Unlike Western secularism, where religion is often seen as a strictly private affair, Indian secularism allows the state to engage with religious institutions to reform practices that may be discriminatory or harmful (e.g., abolition of untouchability or regulation of religious endowments).

    What Implications Do Challenges to Secularism Have for Indian Democracy?

    • Erosion of Minority Rights: The rise of majoritarian politics, fueled by Hindu nationalism, threatens minority rights and equality before the law, with accusations of fostering an environment where attacks on minorities are tolerated.
    • Centralization of Power: The concentration of power has weakened institutional autonomy, curtailed civil liberties, and marginalized minority voices, impacting the democratic principles of secularism and dissent.
    • Impact on Governance and International Relations: Religious considerations in policymaking can result in discriminatory practices, harm India’s international reputation regarding human rights, and attract global criticism.

    Way forward: 

    • Strengthen Legal Safeguards: Reinforce constitutional provisions that protect secularism by ensuring strict enforcement of anti-discrimination laws and promoting inclusive policies that uphold the principles of equality, fraternity, and state neutrality in religious matters.
    • Promote Civic Education on Secularism: Increase public awareness and education about the significance of secularism in India’s constitutional framework to foster social harmony and counter identity-based politics, reinforcing the values of pluralism and unity in diversity.

  • Minority Institutions

    Why in the News?

    • The Supreme Court stated that laws regulating institutions run by religious or linguistic minorities do not inherently violate the principle of secularism.
      • The CJI made this observation while hearing a challenge to the Allahabad High Court’s decision to strike down the Uttar Pradesh Board of Madrasa Education Act, 2004.

    Why do we need to discuss this?

    • The 2004 Act regulated madrasas in Uttar Pradesh, and the High Court concluded that it violated secular principles.
    • It had ordered the transfer of madrasa students to regular schools, which affected nearly 17 lakh students across 16,000 madrasas in the state.
      • Petitioners pointed out that the High Court believed that madrasas violated Article 28 of the Constitution, which prohibits religious instruction in institutions fully funded by the State.

    Key Observations made by the SC:

    • A law regulating a minority institution does not, by itself, violate secularism.
    • The CJI referred to the Hindu Religious Endowments and Charitable Institutions Act, which regulates the administration of religious institutions in many states, from Maharashtra to Tamil Nadu.
    • The CJI emphasized that the State has the right to legislate to improve the quality of education in government-aided minority-run institutions.
    • He noted that children attending madrasas need a broad-based education to learn essential subjects required to lead a proper life and become worthy citizens.

    About Minority Educational Institutions in India:

    Details
    Constitutional Provision Article 30(1) of the Constitution of India grants linguistic and religious minorities the right to establish and administer educational institutions of their choice.
    Legislative Framework National Commission for Minority Educational Institutions Act, 2004 safeguards the educational rights of minorities as per Article 30(1).
    Definition A “Minority Educational Institution” is defined as a college or institution established or maintained by a person or group from amongst the minorities (Section 2(g) of the Act).
    Judicial Precedent In T.M.A. Pai Foundation vs. State of Karnataka (2002), the Supreme Court ruled that minority status is determined by state demographics, not national population.
    Rights of Minority Institutions Article 29 protects the interests of minorities by allowing them to conserve their distinct language, script, or culture.

    • Minority institutions do not have an absolute right to appoint staff;
    • This was upheld in the context of the West Bengal Madrasah Service Commission Act, 2008.
    Recognized Minority Communities Muslims, Sikhs, Christians, Buddhists, Jains, and Zoroastrians (Parsis) are recognized as minority communities under the National Commission for Minorities Act of 1992.
    Significance Minority educational institutions play a crucial role in preserving the cultural and linguistic heritage of minority communities while providing access to education.

     

    PYQ:

    [2011] In India, if a religious sect/community is given the status of a national minority, what special advantages it is entitled to?

    1. It can establish and administer exclusive educational institutions.

    2. The President of India automatically nominates a representative of the community to Lok Sabha.

    3. It can derive benefits from the Prime Minister’s 15-Point Programme.

    Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

    (a) 1 only

    (b) 2 and 3 only

    (c) 1 and 3 only

    (d) 1, 2 and 3

  • SC upholds Section 6A of Citizenship Act as valid

    Why in the News?

    On October 17, 2024, political parties widely welcomed the Supreme Court’s decision upholding Section 6A of the Citizenship Act, addressing citizenship under the Assam Accord.

    What is Section 6A?

    • Section 6A of the Citizenship Act, added in 1985, grants citizenship to immigrants in Assam who entered between January 1, 1966, and March 25, 1971, under the Assam Accord provisions.

    What are the implications of upholding Section 6A for citizenship in Assam?

    • Legal Recognition of the Assam Accord: The verdict reinforces the Assam Accord’s legal status, acknowledging the cut-off date of March 25, 1971, for granting citizenship to immigrants. This solidifies the Accord’s role as a foundational legal document addressing the state’s citizenship issues.
    • Clarifying Citizenship Status: The ruling provides legal clarity on the citizenship status of individuals who entered Assam between January 1, 1966, and March 25, 1971. They are granted citizenship if they comply with specific conditions, while those arriving post-1971 are deemed illegal immigrants.
    • Impact on the NRC Process: The decision may influence the National Register of Citizens (NRC) process in Assam by determining who is eligible for inclusion. The cut-off date could guide the verification of citizenship claims, potentially affecting those at risk of being declared stateless.

    How does this ruling interact with existing immigration laws and policies?

    • Consistency with the Foreigners Act: The ruling aligns with existing immigration policies under the Foreigners Act, where illegal immigrants are identified and potentially deported.
    • Implications for Deportation and Detection: The verdict mandates continued efforts to detect and deport illegal immigrants who arrived post-March 25, 1971.
      • This may intensify identification and deportation processes, requiring robust legal and administrative mechanisms.
    • Role in NRC and Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) Debate: The ruling interacts with ongoing discussions about the CAA, which grants citizenship to non-Muslim migrants from neighboring countries who entered before December 31, 2014.

    What are the broader constitutional implications of this decision?

    • Federalism and Regional Autonomy: The judgment upholds Assam’s unique historical and cultural context, recognizing the state’s special legal provisions under the Assam Accord.
    • Right to Equality and Non-discrimination: By validating different cut-off dates for citizenship determination in Assam compared to the rest of India, the ruling raises questions about equal treatment and the uniformity of laws across the country.
    • Judicial Endorsement of Accord-based Legislation: The ruling sets a precedent for upholding legislation based on historical accords or regional agreements.

    Way forward: 

    • Full Implementation of the Assam Accord: Ensure the complete execution of all clauses of the Accord, including detecting, deleting, and deporting illegal immigrants, while providing support to those recognized as citizens to integrate smoothly into society.
    • Strengthen Legal and Administrative Frameworks: Enhance the infrastructure for the NRC process, deportation mechanisms, and border management to maintain consistency in immigration policies, while addressing humanitarian concerns for affected individuals.

  • Article 142 of the Indian Constitution

    Why in the News?

    The Supreme Court declined a PIL seeking directions under Article 142 to include sexual offences against men, trans-persons, and animals in the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), which replaced the Indian Penal Code (IPC).

    Supreme Court’s Observations:

    • The petitioner argued that the new BNS omitted Section 377 of the IPC, which previously criminalized ‘unnatural sex’ and carnal intercourse involving a man, woman, or animal.
    • In the Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India (2018) case, the Supreme Court struck down Section 377 to the extent that it criminalized consensual sexual acts between adults.
    • Non-consensual homosexual acts remained punishable under this provision.
    • The BNS does not include provisions criminalizing sexual offences against men, trans persons, and animals.
    • During the hearing, the bench comprising CJI DY Chandrachud and Justices JB Pardiwala and Manoj Misra stated that:
      • The Court cannot direct Parliament to create or reintroduce an offence.
      • The creation of offences falls within the parliamentary domain, not under the court’s jurisdiction, even with Article 142.

    About Article 142:

    Details
    Definition • Grants discretionary power to the Supreme Court to pass orders or decrees necessary for complete justice in matters before it.
    • Allows the court to act beyond the limits of statutory law if required.
    Purpose • Ensures justice is delivered in cases where regular laws may not provide adequate remedies.
    • Aims to empower the Supreme Court to address extraordinary situations effectively.
    Key Clauses • Article 142(1): Allows the Supreme Court to pass enforceable orders across India for doing complete justice.
    • Article 142(2): Empowers the court to secure attendance, discovery of documents, or punishment for contempt.
    Notable Cases • Bhopal Gas Tragedy (1989): Supreme Court awarded $470 million compensation, bypassing limitations of ordinary law.
    • Ayodhya Case (2019): Directed the formation of a trust for Ram Mandir construction.• Liquor Sale Ban (2016): Imposed a 500-metre ban on liquor shops along highways using Article 142, extending it beyond central government orders.
    Constructive Application • Invoked for environmental protection, such as in the Taj Mahal cleanup.
    • Justice for undertrials by addressing systemic delays in the judicial process.
    Controversies • Accusations of judicial overreach in certain cases, where actions have seemingly breached the separation of powers principle.
    • Supreme Court Bar Association v. Union of India: Clarified that Article 142 should supplement, not replace the law.
    Impact on Governance • Empowers the Supreme Court with a tool for upholding justice, but raises debates over checks and balances in a democratic system.

     

    PYQ:

    [2019] With reference to the Constitution of India, prohibitions or limitations or provisions contained in ordinary laws cannot act as prohibitions or limitations on the constitutional powers under Article 142. It could mean which one of the following?

    (a) The decisions taken by the Election Commission of India while discharging its duties cannot be challenged in any court of law.

    (b) The Supreme Court of India is not constrained in the exercise of its powers by laws made by the Parliament.

    (c) In the event of grave financial crisis in the country, the President of India can declare Financial Emergency without the counsel from the Cabinet.

    (d) State Legislatures cannot make laws on certain matters without the concurrence of Union Legislature.

  • What special status is Ladakh seeking?

    Why in the News?

    Climate activist Sonam Wangchuk was detained at the Delhi border on Monday night while leading a group of protesters seeking to petition the Central government for Ladakh’s inclusion in the Sixth Schedule of the Constitution, along with other demands for greater autonomy for the region.

    What is Asymmetrical federalism?

    • Asymmetrical federalism refers to a system where some regions or states within a country have more autonomy or special provisions than others. This contrasts with symmetrical federalism, where all states or regions have equal powers.
    • Example in India: The Indian Constitution follows asymmetrical federalism, where certain regions like those under the Fifth and Sixth Schedules or specific northeastern states have special provisions and greater autonomy compared to other states.

    Which are the other States seeking constitutional safeguards?

    • Ladakh: The Union Territory of Ladakh has seen increasing demands for inclusion in the Sixth Schedule of the Constitution to safeguard its indigenous culture and provide greater autonomy.
    • Arunachal Pradesh: The state has passed a resolution seeking inclusion in the Sixth Schedule to grant more autonomy to its tribal populations.
    • Manipur: The Hill Area Committee in Manipur has also demanded inclusion in the Sixth Schedule for its tribal areas, particularly the ‘Hill areas’.

    Do the Fifth and Sixth schedules grant areas under them more autonomy?

    • Fifth Schedule: Grants special protections to ‘scheduled areas’ in 10 states. These areas are governed by Tribes Advisory Councils (TACs) and Governors, who have the power to regulate land transfers, businesses, and the applicability of laws.
    • Sixth Schedule: Provides greater autonomy to ‘tribal areas’ in four northeastern states (Assam, Meghalaya, Mizoram, and Tripura) through Autonomous District Councils (ADCs).
      • ADCs have more legislative, executive, and financial powers, including the ability to regulate land use, social customs, and taxation.

    Why did the British create provisions for ‘excluded’ and ‘partially excluded’ areas?

    • British Policy of Isolation: To avoid unrest and rebellion among the tribal populations, the British adopted a policy of ‘isolation’ by creating ‘excluded’ and ‘partially excluded’ areas in tribal regions under the Government of India Act, 1935.
    • Excluded Areas: These were mostly in the northeastern hilly regions, where the Governor had the authority to legislate.
    • Partially Excluded Areas: These included tribal regions in Central and Eastern India, where laws from central and provincial legislatures were applicable but with modifications, ensuring minimal interference with tribal customs and governance.

    Conclusion:  The government should initiate meaningful consultations with local stakeholders in regions like Ladakh, Arunachal Pradesh, and Manipur to address concerns about cultural preservation and autonomy, ensuring that any constitutional reforms reflect the aspirations of the indigenous populations.