Mains Ready By December. Smash Mains & Smash PYQ Admissions Open
Talk to Mentor

Civilsdaily

GS Paper: GS2-01.Indian Constitution-Historical underpinnings & evolution; Features, amendments, significant provisions, basic structure of Constitution

  • Does India really need State Governors?

    Central Idea

    • The recent termination of a state minister’s appointment by Tamil Nadu Governor R N Ravi has sparked renewed debates on the role and necessity of Governors in Indian states.
    • While conflicts between state governments and the Governor’s office are not new, it is important to examine the position of the Governor and its constitutional implications.

    Who is a State Governor?

    • In India, the position of State Governors is established by the Constitution of India.
    • The constitutional provisions regarding State Governors can be found primarily in Articles 153 to 162 of the Indian Constitution.

    Here are the key aspects of the constitutional position of State Governors in India:

    • Appointment: The Governor of a state is appointed by the President of India. The President acts on the advice of the Council of Ministers headed by the Prime Minister.
    • Executive Power: The Governor is the head of the state executive and exercises executive powers on behalf of the President. The Governor is the representative of the President at the state level.
    • Constitutional Head: The Governor acts as the constitutional head of the state and performs ceremonial functions such as the opening and closing of the state legislature, giving assent to bills, and issuing ordinances.
    • Administrative Role: The Governor plays a crucial role in the administration of the state. The Governor appoints the CM and other members of the Council of Ministers, as well as certain high-ranking state officials.

    Powers and Functions

    • Legislative Functions: The Governor has a role in the legislative process. The Governor summons and prorogues the state legislature, addresses the legislature at the beginning of its first session after each general election, and gives assent to bills passed by the state legislature.
    • Discretionary Powers: The Governor has certain discretionary powers. For example, the Governor can reserve certain bills passed by the state legislature for the consideration of the President. The Governor can also withhold assent to bills under certain circumstances.
    • Emergency Powers: In cases of breakdown of constitutional machinery in a state, the Governor can recommend the imposition of President’s Rule, where the state government is temporarily suspended, and the Governor acts as the executive head of the state.
    • Link with Central Government: The Governor serves as a vital link between the state government and the central government. The Governor communicates with the President and the central government on various matters related to the state.

    Arguments for the Existence of the Governor’s Post

    • Preservation of Provincial Autonomy: The Constituent Assembly aimed to maintain the Governor as the constitutional representative of states in post-independence India.
    • Need for Centralization and Impartiality: Supporters argue that a certain level of centralized power is essential for a developing nation like India, and the Governor ensures impartiality in governance.
    • Continuity and Stability: The Governor’s presence provides stability and continuity in governance, and they play a significant role in administering oaths and delivering inaugural addresses.

    Arguments against the Governor’s Post

    • Interference and Politicization: Critics claim that Governors often interfere in the functioning of state governments, especially those led by opposing political parties, leading to politicization of the office.
    • Lack of Impartiality: Concerns arise about the impartiality of Governors appointed from political backgrounds, potentially influencing their decisions and actions.
    • Redundancy and Inefficiency: Some argue that the role of the Governor can be carried out by alternative mechanisms, and the office incurs unnecessary expenditure.

    Supreme Court’s Stand and Judicial Review

    • Limited Powers and Aid-Advice: The Supreme Court has established that Governors are required to exercise their powers upon the aid and advice of their ministers, except in exceptional circumstances.
    • Judicial Oversight: Through landmark cases, the Supreme Court has set limits on gubernatorial powers, ensuring their actions adhere to the Constitution and the law.

    Recommendations by Commissions and Committees

    • Administrative Reforms Commission (ARC): The ARC, in its report in 1969, emphasized harmonious relations between Governors and state governments, suggesting enhanced cooperation and limited interference.
    • Sarkaria Commission (1983): The commission proposed modifications to augment the responsibilities and influence of Governors while emphasizing impartiality and fixed tenures.
    • Punchhi Commission (2010): Recommendations included consultation with the Chief Minister during the appointment of Governors and expanding their responsibilities in specific areas.
    • Other Proposals: Various recommendations have been made, such as appointing Governors through a collegium, limiting their role to ceremonial duties, or abolishing the post in smaller states or union territories.

    Conclusion

    • The debate surrounding the role of Governors in Indian states continues to evolve.
    • While arguments for the existence of the Governor’s post revolve around preserving provincial autonomy, centralization, and stability, critics highlight concerns of interference, politicization, and redundancy.
    • Judicial oversight and recommendations from commissions and committees have aimed to strike a balance between the Governor’s constitutional responsibilities and the need for impartiality.

  • An unacceptable verdict in the constitutional sense

    constitutional

    What is the news?

    • A recent judgment by the Allahabad High Court in the case of Kiran Rawat vs State of UP.
    • The court declined the prayer of an inter-faith couple in a live-in relationship for protection from police harassment.
    • The court deemed the live-in relationship as a “social problem” and relied on personal laws on marriage

    Central Idea

    • A recent judgment by the Allahabad High Court has garnered significant national attention. The ruling in Kiran Rawat vs State of UP undermines the principles of constitutional morality in personal relationships, a notion repeatedly affirmed by the Supreme Court of India. The judgment, has been criticised for its departure from constitutional principles, disregard for precedent, and reliance on irrelevant personal laws.

    What is the case?

    • The case of the petitioners, a Muslim man and a Hindu woman, was short and simple. They are around 30 years of age, living together and their relation is based on mutual love and affection.
    • They alleged that the local police have been torturing them while living in a rented house, and sought protection from police harassment, allegedly done on the basis of a complaint made by a family member

    What is mean by constitutional morality?

    • Constitutional morality refers to the principles and values embedded in a constitution that guide the interpretation and application of its provisions.
    • It encompasses the spirit and objectives of the constitution, promoting justice, equality, freedom, and the protection of fundamental rights.
    • Constitutional morality goes beyond conventional social norms and customs, emphasizing the adherence to constitutional principles even in the face of opposition or prevailing societal beliefs.

    What is personal liberty?

    • Personal liberty refers to the individual’s freedom to make choices, decisions, and actions without undue interference or coercion from external forces, including the state or other individuals.
    • It is a fundamental right that is protected by various legal frameworks, including constitutions and human rights declarations.
    • Personal liberty encompasses various aspects of an individual’s life, including physical, mental, and emotional well-being, as well as their autonomy and privacy.
    • However, personal liberty is not an absolute right and may be limited in certain circumstances,

    Main factors that make the judgment unacceptable in the constitutional sense

    • Prioritizing Conventional Social Morality: The High Court is accused of being influenced by conventional social morality rather than upholding constitutional principles. This undermines individual autonomy and personal liberty, which are essential components of constitutional morality.
    • Disregard for Supreme Court Judgments: Despite citing Supreme Court judgments on live-in relationships, the High Court rejects their intended purpose without providing sound reasons. This undermines the binding nature of Supreme Court judgments and the consistency of legal interpretation.
    • Irrelevant Reliance on Personal Laws: The judgment relies on personal laws related to marriage that are deemed irrelevant to the case. By doing so, the High Court deviates from the constitutional framework and fails to prioritize the fundamental rights of individuals.

    How the judgement shows an inclination towards orthodoxy?

    • Assuming Marriage as a Condition Precedent: Though there were many deficits in the petition, the High Court could not have assumed that marriage is a condition precedent for constitutional protection and the exercise of fundamental rights.
    • Acting as a Theological Court: In effect, The High Court acted as a theological court, as if the very idea of individual liberty and autonomy are alien to the writ jurisdiction. The verdict shows a clear inclination towards social orthodoxy and religious revivalism.
    • Reiteration of Traditional Beliefs:
    • The court tried to reiterating traditional beliefs on marriage and morals, rather than embracing a progressive and inclusive approach. By relying on and reinforcing traditional views, the court fails to accommodate changing societal norms and the importance of personal choices and freedoms
    • Rejection of Supreme Court Precedents: The law laid down by the Supreme Court is binding on all the courts in the country, as in Article 141 of the Constitution. The judgment of the Allahabad High Court rejects the precedential value of Supreme Court verdicts on live-in relationships, such as D. Velusamy (2010), Indra Sarma (2013), and Dhanu Lal (2015). By doing so, the High Court disregards the guidance provided by the apex court, which has recognized and protected the rights of individuals in live-in relationships.

    The Judgements by the Supreme Court which upholds personal liberty

    • Decriminalization of Adultery in Joseph Shine vs Union of India (2018): In the case of Joseph Shine vs Union of India (2018), the Supreme Court decriminalized adultery defined under Section 497 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC). The court held that individual moral aberrations should not be punished by the state’s police power. The judgment emphasized that fidelity is a value, but not one that the state should police.
    • Striking Down of Section 377: In the case of Navtej Singh Johar (2018), the Supreme Court substantially struck down Section 377 of the IPC, which dealt with same-sex relations. The court’s judgment was a constitutional adjudication rather than a mere moral judgment. It recognized the importance of personal choices and limited the state’s power in the realm of personal relationships.
    • In Lata Singh (2006) case: The SC t directed police authorities throughout the country to see to it that any adult undergoing inter caste or inter religious marriage is not harassed by anyone.
    • Khushboo vs Kanniammal & Anr. (2010): The Supreme Court held, while it is true that the mainstream view in our society is that sexual contact should take place only between marital partners, there is no statutory offence that takes place when adults willingly engage in sexual relations outside the marital setting.

    Note: Note down these judgements to support your argument when question asks you to critically analyse

    Way forward

    • Clear Guidance on Live-in Relationships: The Supreme Court should provide clear guidelines and legal recognition for live-in relationships, emphasizing the protection of individuals’ rights and dignity. This would prevent confusion and inconsistent interpretations by lower courts in the future.
    • Judicial Training and Sensitization: There is a need to conduct training programs and sensitization workshops for judges at all levels. This would ensure a better understanding of constitutional principles, fundamental rights, and the evolving nature of societal norms, enabling judges to make informed and unbiased decisions.
    • Public Awareness Campaigns: Public awareness campaigns should be conducted to educate people about the rights and legal protections available to individuals in live-in relationships. This would help dispel social stigmas and promote acceptance of diverse personal choices.
    • Legislative Reforms: The legislature should consider enacting specific laws or amending existing ones to address the legal rights and responsibilities of individuals in live-in relationships. This would provide clarity and protection to couples in such relationships and ensure equal treatment under the law.
    • Strengthening Precedent: It is crucial to emphasize the binding nature of Supreme Court judgments on all courts in the country. Lower courts should be vigilant in adhering to established precedents, respecting the hierarchy of judicial decisions, and avoiding interpretations that deviate from constitutional principles.
    • Dialogue and Engagement: Societal dialogue and engagement with stakeholders, including legal experts, activists, and religious leaders, can help promote a better understanding of individual rights, personal choices, and the importance of constitutional values in a diverse society

    Conclusion

    • The Allahabad High Court’s judgment in Kiran Rawat vs State of UP reflects a regressive view on personal relationships and disregards constitutional morality. By neglecting Supreme Court judgments, relying on irrelevant personal laws, and failing to uphold personal liberties, the High Court has erred in its duty to provide justice. It is crucial that the Supreme Court rectifies this judicial indiscipline and reaffirms the significance of constitutional tenets in safeguarding individual rights and personal choice

    Also read:

    (more…)

  • Supreme Court asks NGO to move govt against Sarpanch-Patism

    sarpanch

    Central Idea

    • The Supreme Court of India has stated that the government, rather than the judiciary, should address the issue of men exerting power behind elected women who remain “faceless wives and daughters-in-law” in grassroots politics.
    • The court’s remarks came in response to a petition filed by an NGO which highlighted the phenomenon of unelected male relatives wielding political influence, undermining the spirit of women’s reservation in Panchayati Raj Institutions (PRIs).

    Women in PRIs: Legal Aspects

    (a) 73rd Constitutional Amendment Act, 1992:

    • Mandates 33.3% reservation for women in PRIs across the country.
    • Recognizes the Gram Sabha as the foundation of the Panchayat Raj System, empowering it to perform functions and exercise powers entrusted by the State Legislatures.
    • Some states have increased the reservation to 50%, including Andhra Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Gujarat, Himachal Pradesh, Bihar, etc.
    • Out of the 30.41 lakh elected representatives in PRIs, 13.74 lakh (45.2%) are women.

    (b) Article 15(3) of the Constitution:

    • Empowers the State to make special provisions for women.
    • Allows the government to introduce measures to ensure gender equality and promote the interests of women.

    (c) Article 243D:

    • Provides for the reservation of one-third of the total number of seats and offices of Chairpersons in PRIs for women.
    • The reserved seats and offices are allocated through rotation to different constituencies within a Panchayat.
    • These reservations for women are in addition to the reservations for Scheduled Castes (SCs) and Scheduled Tribes (STs) in all three tiers of PRIs.

    (d) Intersectional Reservations:

    • The reservation of seats and offices for women in PRIs also falls within the overall reservations for Scheduled Castes (SCs) and Scheduled Tribes (STs) in all three tiers of PRIs.
    • This provision aims to address the intersecting disadvantages faced by women from marginalized communities.

    (e) Proposed 110th Constitution Amendment Bill:

    • Introduced in the Lok Sabha in 2009 to bring about 50% reservation for women in Panchayats across all states.
    • The bill aimed to increase the reservation beyond the existing 33.3% mandated by the 73rd Amendment Act.
    • Despite multiple tabled attempts, the bill was not passed into law.

    Proxy Sarpanchs in India

    • It is generally observed where an elected lady Sarpanch (the head of a Panchayat) delegates their powers and responsibilities to someone else, typically a family member or a trusted individual.
    • This proxy then acts as a representative or substitute for the Sarpanch in carrying out their duties.
    • Quite often, this delegation is forcefully acquired from women.

    Reasons behind Panchayat Pati syndrome

    • Gender Inequality: Deep-rooted gender inequalities prevalent in Indian society play a significant role in perpetuating the Panchayat Pati syndrome. Patriarchal norms and cultural beliefs that prioritize male authority and decision-making often restrict women’s agency and participation in public affairs.
    • Social Norms and Expectations: Traditional gender roles and societal expectations define women’s primary role as homemakers and caretakers. This perception often results in women being considered unfit or inexperienced in matters of governance
    • Lack of Awareness and Education: Limited access to education and awareness about women’s rights and the importance of their participation in local governance can contribute to the prevalence of Panchayat Pati. Lack of awareness among women themselves, as well as their families and communities, can lead to the perpetuation of discriminatory practices.
    • Male Domination and Resistance to Change: Male dominance in politics and resistance to gender equality can also contribute to the Panchayat Pati syndrome.
    • Political Dynamics and Power Struggles: In some cases, male family members or influential community leaders may strategically use the Panchayat Pati practice to retain power and influence. By controlling women’s decision-making, they can ensure their interests are protected and continue to exert control over the local governance processes.

    Impact of Panchayat Pati syndrome

          1. Economic Impact:

    • The practice of Panchayat Pati limits the active participation of women in decision-making processes within the panchayat.
    • This exclusion can hinder the effective utilization of resources and allocation of funds, potentially leading to suboptimal economic outcomes for the community.
    • Women’s perspectives and needs may not be adequately represented, and projects or initiatives that could benefit women, such as those related to education, healthcare, or livelihood opportunities, may not receive sufficient attention or support.

          2. Social Impact:

    • Panchayat Pati reinforces gender inequalities and perpetuates traditional gender roles within communities.
    • It hampers women’s ability to exercise agency and engage in community development activities. it diminishes their self-esteem and status within the community.

         3. Political Impact:

    • The practice of Panchayat Pati undermines the principles of democratic representation and participatory governance.
    • It restricts the political agency of women and denies them the opportunity to actively contribute to decision-making processes.
    • Women’s perspectives and priorities often differ from those of men, and their exclusion diminishes the diversity of voices and perspectives in local governance. This can lead to policy decisions that may not adequately address the needs and concerns of women and other marginalized groups.

    Court’s Response

    • Not an Executive Authority: The court acknowledged the issue but emphasized that it is not the role of the judiciary to create a spirit of empowerment.
    • Focus on women empowerment: The court pointed out that preventing influential individuals’ wives from contesting elections is not feasible, and empowering women requires an evolutionary process.
    • Government’s Responsibility: The court highlighted that the Ministry of Panchayati Raj should address the petitioner’s grievance and explore better mechanisms to implement the objectives of women’s reservation.
    • Expert Committee and Support Mechanism: The petitioner suggested the formation of an expert committee and the provision of the right support mechanism for women. However, the court deemed this an unrealistic expectation from the judiciary.

    Way forward

    • Engage Men as Allies: Promote male allies in supporting women’s representation in PRIs. Encourage men to actively advocate for gender equality, challenge patriarchal norms, and work towards creating a more inclusive and equitable political environment.
    • Capacity Building and Leadership Development: Provide training and capacity-building programs for women elected representatives in PRIs.
    • Political Awareness and Participation: Conduct awareness campaigns to educate women about their rights, the importance of political participation, and the impact of their involvement in PRIs.
    • Inter-Gender Dialogues: Organize inter-generational dialogues where older leaders and women can exchange knowledge, experiences, and perspectives. This can help bridge the generation gap, promote inter-generational collaboration, and strengthen the collective power of women in PRIs.

    Conclusion

    • It is the responsibility of the executive authority to find suitable solutions and ensure the effective implementation of women’s reservations in panchayat governance.

    Mains Mark enhancer: Successful Women Sarpanch in India

    • Kali Bein Panchayat, Punjab: Kali Bein Panchayat in Punjab gained recognition for its all-women panchayat led by Sarpanch Bibi Jagir Kaur. Under her leadership, the panchayat focused on various development initiatives, including infrastructure development, water conservation, and women empowerment programs.
    • Mawlynnong, Meghalaya: Mawlynnong, a village in Meghalaya, is known for its clean and well-maintained environment. The village achieved this feat under the leadership of women panchayat leaders who implemented strict cleanliness and waste management measures, making it one of the cleanest villages in Asia.
    • Devdungri, Rajasthan: Devdungri village in Rajasthan is an exemplary case of women’s leadership in panchayats. Women panchayat members successfully implemented initiatives to address issues such as child marriage, female foeticide, and women’s education. Their efforts resulted in significant positive changes in the community.

     

  • The case for a Uniform Civil Code

    Central Idea

    • The constitutional provision for a uniform civil code (UCC) necessitates careful deliberation due to its intricate nature and prevailing misgivings. Regrettably, it is often discussed superficially and without regard for its underlying logic and rationale. Hence, a reality check is imperative to comprehend the true intentions of this constitutional mandate.

    Relevance of the topic

    The debate around UCC has gained momentum. Discussion over its impact on socioeconomic dynamics of the country is crucial.

    Also Recently, The 22nd Law Commission of India has sought fresh suggestions from various stakeholders, including public and religious organisations, on the Uniform Civil Code (UCC).

    Background

    • Constitutional Provision: The constitutional provision for a uniform civil code (UCC) is outlined in Article 44 of the Indian Constitution. It falls under Part IV, which comprises the Directive Principles of State Policy. These principles serve as guiding principles for the governance of the country.
    • Directive Principles of State Policy: The Directive Principles of State Policy are not enforceable by the courts but hold significant importance in shaping legislation and government policies. Article 37 of the Constitution states that although these principles are not legally binding, they are fundamental in the governance of the country.
    • Gradual Implementation: Article 44 emphasizes the gradual implementation of a uniform civil code. It directs the State to endeavour to secure a uniform civil code, indicating that the goal is to be pursued over time through suitable amendments to existing laws and the enactment of new ones.
    • Amendments and Enactments: Over the years, several laws of general applicability have been enacted to address specific issues and promote uniformity to some extent. Examples include the Special Marriage Act 1954, Dowry Prohibition Act 1961, Foreign Marriage Act 1969, and laws related to maintenance, domestic violence, child marriage, and the welfare of parents and senior citizens.

    How the implementation of UCC will impact the society?

    • Equality and Justice: One of the primary objectives of the UCC is to establish equality and justice in matters of personal laws. By ensuring a uniform set of laws applicable to all citizens, irrespective of their religious affiliations, the UCC can eliminate discrimination based on religion and promote equal rights and opportunities for all individuals.
    • Gender Empowerment: Many personal laws in India exhibit gender biases and inequalities. The UCC aims to address these disparities and promote gender justice. By providing equal rights and protections to individuals of all genders, the UCC can contribute to empowering women and ensuring their social, economic, and legal equality.
    • Social Cohesion: The UCC can foster social cohesion by promoting a sense of unity and commonality among diverse religious communities. By removing the perceived preferential treatment of one religious’ community over another in personal laws, the UCC can bridge religious divides and strengthen social harmony.
    • Simplification and Certainty: The existence of multiple personal laws can lead to legal complexities and confusion. Implementing the UCC streamlines and harmonizes various family laws, providing legal certainty and simplifying legal procedures. This simplification can benefit individuals and families by reducing ambiguity and ensuring consistent application of laws across the country.
    • Modernization and Adaptation: Personal laws in India are often rooted in traditional customs and practices that may no longer align with modern societal values and needs. The UCC provides an opportunity to modernize and adapt family laws to reflect contemporary realities. It allows for the incorporation of progressive principles and practices that are more in line with the aspirations of individuals and families in today’s society.
    • Secularism and National Identity: The UCC aligns with the secular fabric of India, emphasizing equal treatment under the law irrespective of religious beliefs. Its implementation reinforces the secular principles of the Indian Constitution and promotes a sense of national identity that transcends religious divisions.
    • Legal Uniformity: The UCC establishes legal uniformity by bringing all citizens under the same set of laws for personal matters. This can enhance the effectiveness and efficiency of the legal system, as well as facilitate ease of understanding and compliance for individuals and legal professionals.

    Existing Flaws in personal laws

    • Gender Inequalities: Many personal laws exhibit gender biases and inequalities. For example, in certain inheritance laws, the rights of women are limited based on their gender, resulting in unequal distribution of property. Similarly, provisions related to marriage, divorce, maintenance, and guardianship often have discriminatory aspects that disadvantage women.
    • Religious Biases: Personal laws are specific to different religious communities and are influenced by religious customs and traditions. While these laws aim to protect the religious rights of individuals, they can also perpetuate biases based on religious identity. This can lead to differential treatment and unequal rights for individuals belonging to different religious communities.
    • Complex and Contradictory Provisions: With multiple personal laws in existence, there is a lack of uniformity and consistency in family law matters. The presence of contradictory provisions across different laws creates confusion and legal complexities. Individuals and families often face challenges in navigating the legal system due to these inconsistencies.
    • Outdated Practices: Some personal laws still incorporate outdated practices and customs that may not align with contemporary societal values and principles of equality. These practices can perpetuate inequality and hinder progress towards a more equitable and inclusive society.
    • Lack of Uniformity: The absence of a uniform civil code results in different personal laws being applicable to individuals based on their religious identity. This lack of uniformity can lead to differential treatment and unequal rights, undermining the principles of equality and justice.
    • Inconsistencies in Adoption Laws: Adoption laws can vary based on religious personal laws. For example, in certain personal laws, a man may require his wife’s consent for adoption, while in others, this requirement may not exist. Such inconsistencies create confusion and challenges in the adoption process.

    Misconceptions surrounding UCC

    • Targeting Muslim Law: One common misconception is that the UCC is solely aimed at doing away with Muslim personal law. This perception has created a misbelief that the UCC is intended to undermine or replace Islamic practices. However, the article clarifies that the objective of the UCC is to establish uniformity in family laws across all communities, not just Muslim law.
    • Archaic and Anti-Women Perception: Another misconception is that Muslim personal law is seen as archaic and anti-women. This misperception overlooks the fact that Islamic law, in its authentic form, recognizes the sanctity of family life and provides grounds for divorce based on irretrievable breakdown. The article points out that distortions and misinterpretations have obscured the true essence of Islamic law.
    • Exclusively Hindu Law Acts: Some proponents of the UCC view the four Hindu law Acts of 1955-56 as the ideal model. However, this perception disregards the fact that these Acts initially contained provisions conflicting with constitutional ideals of religious equality and gender justice. Recent amendments have improved the situation, but there is still room for further progress.
    • Neglecting Local Laws: There are misconception that the UCC ignores certain local laws protected by parliamentary legislation or constitutional safeguards. This perception arises from a lack of consideration for the closing words of Article 44, which state that the UCC should be applicable “throughout the territory of India.” It is important to acknowledge and address the diversity of customary and local laws in the process of implementing a uniform code.
    • Lack of Progress: There is a misconception that there has been no progress towards a uniform civil code. However, the article highlights the enactment of several laws of general application, amendments to personal laws, and the ongoing efforts to bring about gradual uniformity in family laws. These advancements demonstrate progress in the direction of a UCC.

    Way Forward

    • Inclusive and Consultative Approach: The process of formulating a UCC should involve an inclusive and consultative approach. It is important to engage with a diverse range of stakeholders, including legal experts, social reformers, religious leaders, community representatives, and the public at large. This ensures that multiple perspectives are considered and the concerns of different communities are addressed.
    • Drafting a Comprehensive Code: A representative group of acclaimed social reformers and legal academics should collaborate to draft a comprehensive UCC. This draft should be free from religious discrimination and gender inequality, encompassing the principles of equality, justice, and modern societal values.
    • Addressing Concerns and Misconceptions: There should be efforts to address the concerns and misconceptions surrounding the UCC. Clear communication and public discourse can help dispel misconceptions and create a better understanding of the objectives and benefits of a uniform civil code. Engaging with religious leaders and communities in a respectful manner can also help alleviate apprehensions.
    • Gradual Implementation: Given the complexity of personal laws and the diversity of the Indian society, the implementation of the UCC should be gradual. It should involve phased reforms, allowing for a smooth transition and ensuring that the necessary legal infrastructure and awareness are in place. This approach acknowledges the need for careful consideration and adaptation to specific social and cultural contexts.
    • Legislative Process: The draft of the UCC should be presented to the legislature for discussion, debate, and refinement. The involvement of lawmakers in the legislative process ensures democratic scrutiny and allows for amendments based on the inputs and recommendations of various stakeholders.
    • Sensitization and Awareness: Public awareness campaigns and sensitization programs should be conducted to educate the public about the UCC, its objectives, and its potential benefits. This can help build a consensus and generate support among the masses, promoting a smooth implementation process.
    • Judicial Review: The UCC, once enacted, may face legal challenges. The judiciary’s role is crucial in interpreting and upholding the constitutionality of the UCC. Judicial review ensures that the code is consistent with the fundamental rights enshrined in the Indian Constitution and maintains a fair balance between personal freedom and societal interests.

    Conclusion

    • Given the intricacies surrounding the constitutional provision for a uniform civil code, it is crucial to exercise caution and clarity while discussing its aims, objects, and means of implementation. The progress made thus far, as well as the existing flaws in family laws, indicate the need for gradual reforms.

  • Reservation for Transgender Community

    trans

    Central Idea

    • Maharashtra government said it was difficult to provide additional reservations to transgender persons in education and public employment due to existing reservations for various communities in India.
    • Transgender individuals in Mumbai protested against this statement.

    Courts’ rulings on reservations for transgender community

    • National Legal Services Authority of India (NALSA) v Union of India (2014) case: The Supreme Court ruled that transgender persons have a right to reservation as they are considered a socially and educationally backward class.
    • Direction for reservations: The court directed the Centre and State Governments to treat transgender persons as socially and educationally backward and extend all kinds of reservation for admission to educational institutions and public appointments.
    • Lack of clarity on the nature of reservations: The NALSA judgment does not specify whether reservations for transgender persons should be vertical or horizontal.

    Understanding horizontal reservations

    • Distinction between vertical and horizontal reservations: Reservation in India is divided into two categories—vertical and horizontal.
    • Vertical reservations: Aimed at addressing social asymmetry arising from caste hierarchy and backwardness, including reservations for Scheduled Castes (SC), Scheduled Tribes (ST), and Other Backward Classes (OBC).
    • Horizontal reservations: Cut across all vertical groups to provide affirmative policies for disadvantaged groups within categories. For example, disabled persons are guaranteed horizontal reservation in all vertical categories.

    Demand for horizontal reservation for transgender community

    • Recognition of marginalization: Transgender individuals have faced long-term marginalization in society, warranting specific provisions and recognition of their social identity.
    • Employment challenges: A study reveals that only 6 percent of transgender people were formally employed in 2017, and many engage in informal work due to societal factors and survival needs.
    • Interpreting the NALSA verdict: The NALSA judgment has been interpreted as directing reservations for transgender individuals in the OBC category due to their identification as a socially and educationally backward class.
    • Concerns and choice: The demand for horizontal reservation raises concerns that Dalit, Bahujan, and Adivasi transgender individuals may have to choose between availing reservation based on caste and gender identities, leading to competition and exclusion.

    Progress on horizontal reservations

    • Lack of action by the Central government: Since the NALSA judgment, the Central government has not taken steps to implement the right to reservation for transgender persons.
    • Legislative developments: The Rights of Transgender Persons Bill, 2015, which included provisions for reservations, was rejected in the Lok Sabha. The Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Act, 2019, does not mention reservations.
    • Parallel provisions for disabled persons: The Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016, ensures horizontal reservation for disabled individuals under the Central government.
    • State-level initiatives: Tamil Nadu categorized trans-women under the Most Backward Classes (MBC) category, and Karnataka introduced 1% horizontal reservation for transgender persons. Madhya Pradesh included transgender persons in the OBC category.
    • Legal challenges and petitions: Transgender persons have filed petitions in various High Courts, seeking horizontal reservation in education and jobs.

    Way forward

    • Need for legal action: The lack of progress in implementing horizontal reservations for transgender individuals requires legal challenges to ensure their rights are upheld.
    • Intersectionality and inclusive policies: Ensuring horizontal reservation while considering the diverse identities within the transgender community, including caste and tribal backgrounds, is crucial for equitable representation.
    • Promoting employment opportunities: Implementation of horizontal reservations can contribute to addressing employment challenges and empowering transgender individuals in various sectors.
    • Public awareness and support: Creating awareness about the need for horizontal reservation and garnering public support can strengthen the advocacy for inclusive policies.
    • Collaboration with civil society and stakeholders: Engaging with activists, community leaders, and organizations working on transgender rights can drive collective efforts to achieve meaningful horizontal reservations.

  • Elections to 10 Rajya Sabha Seats

    Central Idea

    • The Election Commission announced elections to 10 Rajya Sabha seats from three States that are falling vacant in July and August.

    Rajya Sabha and its Composition

    • Rajya Sabha, or the Council of States, is the upper house of the Parliament of India.
    • It plays a vital role in the legislative process, representing the interests of states and providing a platform for deliberations on important national issues.

    Composition of Rajya Sabha

    • Members: Rajya Sabha consists of a maximum of 250 members, of which 238 members are representatives of states and union territories, while the President of India nominates 12 members having special knowledge or practical experience in various fields.
    • Allocation of Seats: The allocation of seats in Rajya Sabha is based on the population of each state, with larger states having more representatives. The President can also nominate members to ensure the representation of expertise and diverse backgrounds.
    • Term: Members of Rajya Sabha serve for a term of 6 years, with one-third of the members retiring every two years. This rotational system ensures continuity in the functioning of the house.

    Nominated Members

    • Nominations: In addition to the elected members, Rajya Sabha includes 12 nominated members who are appointed by the President of India. These nominations are made to ensure the representation of individuals with special knowledge or practical experience in various fields such as literature, science, art, social service, and more.
    • Expertise and Diversity: Nominated members bring diverse perspectives and expertise to Rajya Sabha. They contribute to the legislative process by providing valuable insights and enriching debates on critical issues.
    • Contribution: Nominated members play an essential role in shaping legislation and policy discussions. Their expertise and experience contribute to a more comprehensive and informed decision-making process in Rajya Sabha.

    Functions of Rajya Sabha

    • Legislative Functions: Rajya Sabha has equal legislative powers with the Lok Sabha in most matters, including passing bills related to constitutional amendments, finance, and non-financial matters. In certain circumstances, it enjoys exclusive powers, such as creating all-India services.
    • Representation of States: Rajya Sabha represents the interests of states, allowing them to participate in the decision-making process at the national level. It ensures that laws and policies are formulated with the consideration of diverse regional perspectives.
    • Role in Impeachment: Rajya Sabha, along with the Lok Sabha, plays a role in the impeachment of the President of India, Chief Justice, and judges of the Supreme Court and High Courts. It ensures a fair and balanced process in cases of impeachment.

    Significance of Rajya Sabha

    • Federal Character: Rajya Sabha represents the federal character of India’s political system by giving states and union territories a voice in the national legislature. It serves as a platform for states to raise their concerns and participate in policy discussions.
    • Reviewing and Amending Legislation: Rajya Sabha plays a critical role in the legislative process by reviewing and amending bills passed by the Lok Sabha. It acts as a revising chamber and provides an opportunity for in-depth scrutiny and debate on proposed laws.
    • Expertise and Stability: The nomination of members with specialized knowledge and experience, along with the rotational system, ensures that Rajya Sabha benefits from their expertise. The continuity of membership allows for stability and the accumulation of institutional knowledge.

     

    Try this PYQ:

    Q.Consider the following statements:

    1. The Chairman and the Deputy Chairman of the Rajya Sabha are not the members of that House.
    2. While the nominated members of the two Houses of the Parliament have no voting right in the presidential election, they have the right to vote in the election of the Vice President.

    Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

    (a) 1 only

    (b) 2 only

    (c) Both 1 and 2

    (d) Neither 1 nor 2

    [wpdiscuz-feedback id=”m0llo70xd9″ question=”Please leave a feedback on this” opened=”1″]Post your answers here.[/wpdiscuz-feedback]

  • India needs a Uniform Civil Code: PM

    uniform civil code

    Central Idea

    • Immediately after returning from the US, PM Modi said that India needed a Uniform Civil Code (UCC) as the country could not run with the dual system of “separate laws for separate communities”.
    • This has raised the level of speculations among the left liberal groups in India.

    Key statements made by PM

    • Abolishing Dual System: PM highlighted the impracticality of maintaining separate laws for different communities and emphasized the need for a unified legal framework.
    • Discerning Political Manipulation: He urged the Muslim community to be vigilant about political parties that exploit their interests for personal gains.
    • Constitutional Provisions: He emphasized that the Constitution already upholds the principle of equal rights for all citizens.
    • Opposition’s Exploitation: He criticized political opponents for using Muslims, particularly Pasmanda Muslims, to further their own interests at the expense of the community’s well-being.

    What is Uniform Civil Code (UCC)?

    • The UCC aims to establish a single personal civil law for the entire country, applicable to all religious communities in matters such as marriage, divorce, inheritance, adoption, etc.
    • The idea of a UCC has a long history in India and has been a topic of debate and discussion.
    • This article explores the basis for a UCC, its timeline, the conflict with the right to freedom of religion, minority opinions, challenges to implementation, and the way forward.

    Basis for UCC: Article 44

    • Article 44 of the Directive Principles envisions the state’s endeavor to secure a UCC for all citizens throughout the country.
    • While DPSP of the Constitution are not enforceable by courts, they provide fundamental principles for governance.

    Personal Laws and UCC: A Timeline

    • Colonial Period: Personal laws were first framed for Hindu and Muslim citizens during the British Raj.
    • 1940: The idea of a UCC was proposed by the National Planning Commission, examining women’s status and recommending reforms for gender equality.
    • 1947: UCC was considered as a fundamental right during the framing of the Constitution by Minoo Masani, Hansa Mehta, Amrit Kaur, and Dr. B.R. Ambedkar.
    • 1948: The Constitution Assembly debated Article 44, which emphasizes the implementation of uniform civil laws as a state duty under Part IV.
    • 1950: Reformist bills were passed, granting Hindu women the right to divorce and inherit property and outlawing bigamy and child marriages.
    • 1951: Ambedkar resigned when his draft of the Hindu Code Bill was stalled in Parliament.
    • 1985: Shah Bano case highlighted the need for a UCC and the rights of divorced Muslim women.
    • 1995: Sarla Mudgal v. Union of India reiterated the urgency of a UCC for national integration and removing contradictions.
    • 2000: The Supreme Court, in Lily Thomas v. Union of India, stated it could not direct the government to introduce a UCC.
    • 2015: The apex court refused to mandate a decision on implementing a UCC.
    • 2016: The Triple Talaq debate gained attention, leading to the ruling of its unconstitutionality in 2017.

    UCC vs. Right to Freedom of Religion

    1. Article 25: Guarantees an individual’s fundamental right to religion.
    2. Article 26(b): Upholds the right of religious denominations to manage their own affairs.
    3. Article 29: Protects the right to conserve distinctive culture.
    • Reasonable restrictions can be imposed on freedom of religion for public order, health, morality, and other provisions related to fundamental rights.

    Minority Opinion in the Constituent Assembly

    • Some members sought to exempt Muslim Personal Law from state regulation, arguing against interference in personal laws based on secularism.
    • Concerns were raised about uniformity in a diverse country like India and the potential for opposition from different communities.
    • Gender justice was not a significant focus during these debates.

    Enacting and Enforcing UCC

    • Fundamental rights are enforceable in courts, while Directive Principles have varying degrees of enforceability.
    • The wording of Article 44 suggests a lesser duty on the state compared to other Directive Principles.
    • Fundamental rights are considered more important than Directive Principles, and a balance between both is crucial.

    Need for UCC

    • Multiple personal laws: Different religions and denominations follow distinct property and matrimonial laws, hindering national unity.
    • Absence of exclusive jurisdiction: Such thing in the Union List implies that the framers did not intend to have a UCC.
    • Customary laws are discriminatory: These laws also vary among different communities and regions.

    Why is UCC Necessary?

    • Harmonizing equality: UCC would provide equal status to all citizens, promote gender parity, and align with the aspirations of a liberal and young population.
    • Promote fraternity: Implementation of UCC would support national integration.

    Hurdles to UCC Implementation

    • Opposition from religious factions: The diverse religious and cultural landscape of India poses practical difficulties.
    • Minority resistance: UCC is often perceived by minorities as an encroachment on religious freedom and interference in personal matters.
    • Societal preparedness: Experts argue that Indian society may not be ready to embrace a UCC at present.

    Unaddressed Questions

    • Ignoring diversities: Maintaining the essence of diverse components of society while achieving uniformity in personal laws.
    • One size fits all: The assumption that practices of one community are backward or unjust.
    • Uniqueness of diversity: The effectiveness of uniformity in eradicating societal inequalities.

    Way Forward

    • Theological education: Religious intelligentsia should educate their communities about rights and obligations based on modern interpretations.
    • Open discussion: The government should create an environment conducive to UCC by explaining Article 44’s contents and significance while considering different perspectives.
    • Gradual introduction: Social reforms should be gradual, addressing concerns such as fake news and disinformation.
    • Prioritizing social harmony: Preserving the cultural fabric of the nation is essential.

  • President’s Rule not an option in Manipur: MHA

    Central Idea: Union Home Minister has said that imposition of President’s Rule in Manipur was not an option and the situation was soon returning to normal.

    What is President Rule?

    • Article 356 of the Indian Constitution, commonly known as President’s Rule, empowers the President to impose central rule in a state where the constitutional machinery has broken down.
    • While initially intended for extraordinary circumstances, it has often been misused by central governments for political purposes.

    Provisions of Article 356:

    • Imposition of President’s Rule: Article 356 allows the President to withdraw the executive and legislative powers of a state government when it cannot function in accordance with the Constitution.
    • Triggering factors: The President can invoke Article 356 based on a report from the Governor or suo motu if the constitutional machinery has broken down in the state.
    • Duration: It can be imposed for six months at a time, with a maximum duration of three years.
    • Parliamentary approval: Every six months, Parliament’s approval is required to continue the imposition of President’s Rule.

    Historical Origins

    • Inspiration from the Government of India Act, 1935: Article 356 was inspired by Section 93 of this act, which allowed the Governor of a province to assume the powers of the government under certain circumstances.
    • Controlled democracy: The provision provided some autonomy to provincial governments while enabling British authorities to exercise ultimate power when necessary.

    Political Misuse of Article 356

    • Early instances: During Congress dominance, Article 356 was used against governments of the Left and regional parties in states. Jawaharlal Nehru’s government utilized it six times until 1959, including to dislodge Kerala’s elected communist government.
    • Increasing misuse: In subsequent decades, Article 356 was used frequently against state governments by various central governments, including those led by Indira Gandhi and the Janata Party.

    Landmark Judgment: S R Bommai Case

    • Landmark Supreme Court ruling: In the 1994 R. Bommai v. Union of India case, the Supreme Court provided detailed guidelines on the use of Article 356.
    • Specific instances for imposition: The court stated that President’s Rule can be invoked in cases of physical breakdown of the government or a ‘hung assembly.’
    • Curbing arbitrary use: The judgment emphasized the need to give the state government a chance to prove its majority or instances of violent breakdown before imposing President’s Rule.

    Try this PYQ:

    Which of the following are not necessarily the consequences of the proclamation of the President’s rule in a State?

    1. Dissolution of the State Legislative Assembly
    2. Removal of the Council of Ministers in the State
    3. Dissolution of the local bodies

    Select the correct answer using the code given below:

    (a) 1 and 2

    (b) 1 and 3

    (c) 2 and 3

    (d) 1, 2 and 3

     

    [wpdiscuz-feedback id=”esncttjzlp” question=”Please leave a feedback on this” opened=”1″]Post your answers here.[/wpdiscuz-feedback]

  • What is Habeas Corpus Petition?

    habeas corpus

    Central Idea: The Madras High Court has accepted a request made on behalf of a Minister’s wife, for an urgent hearing of a habeas corpus petition filed by her accusing the Enforcement Directorate (ED) of not having followed due procedure while arresting her husband early.

    Habeas Corpus: A Safeguard for Personal Liberty

    1. Definition: Habeas corpus is a legal recourse that enables individuals to challenge unlawful detentions or imprisonments by reporting them to a court.
    2. Purpose: It allows individuals to request the court to order the custodian, typically a prison official, to present the detained person before the court and determine the legality of the detention.
    3. Applicability in India: In India, the power to issue a writ of habeas corpus is vested in the Supreme Court and the High Courts.
    4. Quick Remedy: Habeas corpus is considered an effective means of promptly addressing the loss of personal liberty without legal justification.

    Article 32: Right to Constitutional Remedies

    1. Fundamental Right: Article 32 of the Constitution of India affirms the right to constitutional remedies, granting individuals the right to approach the Supreme Court for the enforcement of their fundamental rights.
    2. Scope: It empowers the Supreme Court to issue directions, orders, or writs to uphold the rights conferred in Part III of the Constitution.
    3. Suspension: The right guaranteed by Article 32 cannot be suspended except under specific provisions mentioned in the Constitution, such as during a state of emergency.
    4. Significance: Dr. B.R. Ambedkar described Article 32 as the soul and heart of the Constitution, emphasizing its crucial role in safeguarding rights.

    Rights Protected by Article 32

    1. Inclusion in Part III: Article 32 is listed alongside other fundamental rights in Part III of the Constitution, including the right to equality, freedom of speech and expression, life and personal liberty, and freedom of religion.
    2. Direct Approach to Supreme Court: Under Article 32, individuals can directly approach the Supreme Court only when any of their fundamental rights are violated.

    Types of Writs under Article 32

    1. Habeas Corpus: Pertains to personal liberty in cases of illegal detention and wrongful arrest.
    2. Mandamus: Directs public officials, governments, and courts to perform their statutory duties.
    3. Quo Warranto: Requires a person to demonstrate the authority by which they hold a public office.
    4. Prohibition: Orders judicial or quasi-judicial authorities to halt proceedings beyond their jurisdiction.
    5. Certiorari: Allows the re-examination of orders issued by judicial, quasi-judicial, or administrative authorities.

    Remedy Hierarchy and Fundamental Rights Violations

    • Civil or Criminal Matters: In civil or criminal cases, individuals first approach trial courts, followed by appeals to the High Courts and the Supreme Court.
    • Violation of Fundamental Rights: In cases of fundamental rights violations, individuals have the option to approach the High Court under Article 226 or directly approach the Supreme Court under Article 32 for redress.

    Try this PYQ:

    Q. Which of the following is included in the original jurisdiction of the Supreme Court?

    1. Disputes between the Government of India and one or more States
    2. A dispute regarding elections to either the House of the Parliament or the of Legislature of a State
    3. A dispute between the Government of India and the Union Territory
    4. A dispute between two or more States.

    Select the correct answer using the codes given below:

    (a) 1 and 2

    (b) 2 and 3

    (c) 1 and 4

    (d) 3 and 4

     

    [wpdiscuz-feedback id=”1j13rdmirv” question=”Please leave a feedback on this” opened=”1″]Post your answers here.[/wpdiscuz-feedback]

    Back2Basics: Comparison of Writs

    Meaning Purpose Issued When Important Judgments Limitations

    Habeas Corpus

    		 “You have the Body” Protection of personal liberty and freedom from unlawful detention Unlawful detention without authority of law Kerala Habeas Corpus case, ADM Jabalpur v. Shivakant Shukla Cannot be issued if detention is lawful or authorized by a competent court

    Quo Warranto

    		 “By what means” Challenging the right to hold a public office In cases of public offices Ashok Pandey v. Mayawati, G.D. Karkare v. T.L. Shevde Cannot be issued for private organizations or if the office is not substantive

    Mandamus

    		 “We Command” Ensuring correct performance of mandatory duties For correct performance of legal duties Rashid Ahmad v. Municipal Board, Binny Ltd. v. V. Sadasivan Not issued against the President or Governor

    Certiorari

    		 “To be certified” Correcting errors of jurisdiction and procedure Wrongful exercise of jurisdiction or procedural errors Surya Dev Rai v. Ram Chander Rai, T.C. Basappa v. T. Nagappa Cannot be issued against individuals, private authorities, or for amendment of an Act

    Prohibition

    		 “To stop” Preventing an inferior court from exceeding its jurisdiction Lower court exceeds jurisdiction or acts contrary to law East India Commercial Co. v. Collector of Customs, Bengal Immunity Co. Ltd Not issued if the court is acting within its jurisdiction or for administrative functions

     

  • HC Observations over Right to Change Name

    Central Idea

    • Allahabad High Court has allowed a man to change his name citing fundamental rights under Articles 19(1) (a), 21, and 14.
    • Delhi High Court permitted two brothers to reflect their father’s changed surname on their Board certificates, asserting the right to identity as an intrinsic part of the right to life under Article 21.
    Article Summary
    Article 19(1)(a) Freedom of speech and expression: Citizens have the right to express their opinions and ideas freely, with reasonable restrictions to safeguard national interests and public order.
    Article 21 Right to life and personal liberty: Individuals are protected from arbitrary deprivation of life or liberty and have the right to live with dignity. It includes the right to privacy and encompasses various aspects of human rights.
    Article 14 Right to equality: All individuals are entitled to equal protection under the law, ensuring fairness and prohibiting discrimination based on religion, race, caste, sex, or place of birth. It promotes equality before the law for all citizens.

    Right to Change Name

    • The right to change one’s name is recognized as a fundamental right under Article 21 of the Constitution, which guarantees the right to life and personal liberty.
    • It is often exercised for various reasons, including personal preferences, religious conversions, marriage or divorce, or to overcome social or cultural barriers.
    • Individuals may choose to change their names to reflect their gender identity, religious beliefs, or to align with their professional or artistic pursuits.

    Process to change the name

    1. Prepare a petition stating the desire to change the name and reasons for the change.
    2. Prepare an affidavit affirming the intention to change the name and get it notarized.
    3. Publish a notice in two local newspapers announcing the name change.
    4. Apply for Gazette notification through the Department of Publication.
    5. Gather supporting documents like identity and address proof.
    6. File the petition, affidavit, and supporting documents in the appropriate court.
    7. Attend the court hearing and provide necessary explanations.
    8. Obtain a court order approving the name change.
    9. Update official documents with the new name.

    Observations by the HCs

    • Allahabad High Court ruled that the rejection of the name-change applications by the authorities violates fundamental rights guaranteed under Articles 19(1)(a), 21, and 14.
    • It emphasized the need for congruence in all identity-related documents and the prevention of confusion and potential misuse.
    • Delhi High Court asserted the right to identity as an intrinsic part of the right to life under Article 21.

    Restrictions on the Right to Change Names

    • Although the right to change names is a fundamental right, it is subject to reasonable restrictions.
    • Restrictions imposed by law must be fair, just, and reasonable.
    • Principle of proportionality and the value of human dignity play important roles in determining the reasonableness of restrictions (Jeeja Ghosh vs. Union of India, 2016).