Mains Ready By December. Smash Mains & Smash PYQ Admissions Open
Talk to Mentor

Civilsdaily

GS Paper: GS2-18.Bilateral, regional and global groupings and agreements involving India and/or affecting India’s interests.

  • India-UK Free Trade Agreement: A Strategic Shift in Trade Relations

    fta

    Central Idea

    • External Affairs Minister recent discussions with British PM have put the India-UK Free Trade Agreement (FTA) at the forefront of bilateral negotiations.

    Why does this FTA matter?

    • The FTA, when finalized, is expected to not only enhance economic ties between India and the UK but also serve as a blueprint for similar agreements with India’s second-largest trading partner, the European Union (EU).

    What is Free Trade Agreement (FTA)?

    • A Free Trade Agreement (FTA) is a legally binding trade pact between two or more countries or regions that aims to reduce or eliminate barriers to trade and promote economic cooperation.
    • FTAs are designed to facilitate the exchange of goods and services across borders by reducing or eliminating tariffs (import taxes), quotas, and various non-tariff barriers, such as regulations and licensing requirements.
    • These agreements are negotiated to create a more open and competitive trade environment, fostering economic growth and prosperity among the participating nations.

    India’s considerations and UK

    • Economic Integration: India is reorienting its trade strategy, moving away from previous trade deals that widened deficits with East Asian countries. Instead, it’s focusing on strengthening economic integration with Western and African nations.
    • Reducing Dependence on China: The disruption of global supply chains during the pandemic exposed the risks of overreliance on China. Western countries, including Australia and the UK, are now seeking a ‘China-plus one’ approach in trade.
    • RCEP Exit: India’s exit from the China-dominated Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) further underscores its desire to bolster trade ties with the UK, EU, Australia, and others as a counterbalance to China’s influence.

    Brexit Influence and UK’s Perspective

    • Crucial for UK: A trade deal with India holds significant importance for the UK, especially as it faces a challenging election in early 2025. Concerns that fueled the Brexit vote have made the UK cautious about offering work permits to Indian service sector workers under the FTA.
    • Market Compensation: Despite Brexit uncertainties, the vast Indian market provides London with an opportunity to offset the loss of access to the European Single Market.

    Benefits for India and the UK

    • India’s Gains: Indian labour-intensive sectors like apparel and gems & jewellery have struggled with declining market share. A trade deal could potentially level the playing field with competitors like Bangladesh. However, it may have repercussions on Least Developed Countries.
    • UK’s Advantages: Past trade deals have shown that eliminating duties doesn’t guarantee export growth. Reduction of tariffs on British exports like cars, whisky, and wines could provide deeper access to Indian markets.
    • Tariff Disparity: The average tariff on Indian imports to the UK is 4.2%, while the average tariff in India on goods from the UK is 14.6%, highlighting the potential for tariff alignment.

    Addressing Non-Tariff Barriers (NTBs)

    • Modern FTA Scope: FTA negotiations could focus on eliminating non-tariff barriers (NTBs), which have historically hindered exports. NTBs often involve regulations, standards, testing, certification, or reshipment inspections, especially in agriculture and manufacturing.
    • Conformity Assessments: Indian agricultural exporters often face strict limits on contaminants, and Indian products face rejections due to conformity assessments and technical requirements.

    Carbon Tax and Impact

    • The UK, akin to the EU, is considering a carbon border adjustment mechanism (CBAM) that imposes a carbon tax on certain imports based on emissions.
    • This move may affect India’s exports, even with reduced tariffs, particularly in sectors like cement, chemicals, steel, and power generation.

    Conclusion

    • The India-UK Free Trade Agreement represents a strategic shift in India’s trade policy, emphasizing Western and African integration while mitigating dependence on China.
    • For the UK, it offers a chance to compensate for Brexit-related losses and strengthen ties with a significant economic partner.
    • Addressing tariff disparities, NTBs, and carbon taxes will be pivotal in shaping the FTA’s impact on both nations’ economies.

  • India to host second Voice of Global South Summit

    global south

    Central Idea

    • Prime Minister will inaugurate the second Voice of Global South Summit. This will be the second Voice of Global South Summit in less than a year hosted by India.

    What is the Voice of Global South Summit?

    • The VoGS Summit is a Indian initiative that has been designed to provide a common platform for the countries of the Global South to share their perspectives and priorities on several major issues.
    • It aims to find out solutions for common challenges faced by developing countries through talks.
    • Inspired by PM’s vision, ‘Sabka Saath Sabka Vikas Sabka Vishwas aur Sabka Prayas’, the summit follows India’s philosophy of Vasudhaiva Kutumbakam.

    How did the summit start?

    • The foundation of this unique initiative was laid considering the recent global developments that have severely impacted the developing world.
    • These include events such as Covid pandemic, mounting debt, ongoing Ukraine conflict, and challenges of food, energy security and others.
    • Often, the worries of developing countries do not gain adequate attention and space on the global stage.
    • The relevant existing platforms have proven to be deficient in handling the challenges and concerns of the developing nations.

    About Global South

    • Global South refers to countries in Asia, Africa, and South America, while Global North includes countries like the US, Canada, Europe, Russia, Australia, and New Zealand.
    • It’s a term used to categorize countries based on economic development and historical factors.

    Features of Global South

    • Mostly lower-income countries, often with colonial histories.
    • Not strictly limited to the Southern Hemisphere; many are in the Northern Hemisphere.
    • Used as a value-free alternative to “Third World.”
    • Major countries like Brazil, China, India, Indonesia, and Mexico are part of the Global South.

    Need for Classification

    • Helps describe economic and geopolitical differences.
    • Overcomes the limitations of East/West or First/Second/Third World classifications.
    • Recognizes the shared history of colonization.
    • Acknowledges the emergence of economically powerful South countries.

    Indian Context

    • India aims to represent the underrepresented Global South in international forums.
    • Calls for reform in multilateral institutions like the UNSC, UN, and IMF.
    • Emergent economies like India and China seek cooperation with other Global South countries.
    • Challenges the dominance of the Global North in international affairs.

    Criticism of Classification

    • Some find the term too broad and vague.
    • Questions about whether elites of the Global South aim to challenge global capitalist structures.
    • Concerns about the neglect of Africa in the rise of Asia.

    Significance of Global South

    • India aims to unite Global South nations to address common concerns.
    • Potential for technical and idea exchanges and cooperation in various areas.
    • Highlighting shared concerns like energy security and sustainable development.

    Challenges for Consolidation

    • Debate over climate reparations and exclusion of India and China.
    • Impact of the Russia-Ukraine War on Least Developed Countries.
    • China’s increasing influence in the Global South through initiatives like the Belt and Road.

    Way Forward

    • India needs active engagement in regional politics within the Global South.
    • Recognize differentiation within the Global South in terms of wealth, needs, and capabilities.

  • Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) and India

    Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC)

    Central Idea

    • The Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) Leaders’ Week is currently underway in San Francisco, bringing together leaders from the Asia-Pacific region to discuss pressing economic and trade issues.
    • Although India is not an APEC member, is participating at the forum.

    Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC): An Overview

    • Founding: APEC, established in 1989, is a regional economic forum aimed at promoting regional economic integration and greater prosperity in the Asia-Pacific region. It consists of 21 member economies, termed “economies” due to their focus on trade and economic matters.
    • Member Economies: APEC’s member economies include Australia, Brunei, New Zealand, Papua New Guinea, Hong Kong (as part of China), the Philippines, Indonesia, Malaysia, Vietnam, Singapore, Thailand, Chinese Taipei (Taiwan), China, Japan, South Korea, Russia, Canada, the United States, Mexico, Peru, and Chile, strategically located around the Pacific Ocean.

    APEC’s Role over the Years

    • Champion of Free Trade: APEC has consistently advocated for free trade, reduction of trade tariffs, and economic liberalization.
    • Seoul Declaration: The 1991 Seoul Declaration marked the establishment of a liberalized free trade area around the Pacific Rim as APEC’s primary objective.
    • Economic Impact: APEC initiatives have contributed significantly to the development of a growing middle class in the Asia-Pacific region. APEC economies, comprising 2.9 billion citizens, account for approximately 60 percent of global GDP and 48 percent of global trade as of 2018.

    India’s Interest in APEC

    • Historical Interest: India expressed interest in joining APEC in 1991, coinciding with the initiation of economic reforms for liberalization and globalization.
    • Rationale: India’s interest in APEC is based on its geographical location, the potential size of its economy, and its trade interactions with the Asia-Pacific.
    • Challenges: APEC has maintained an informal moratorium on expanding membership, despite India’s interest. The US-India Joint Strategic Vision for the Asia-Pacific and Indian Ocean Region in 2015 welcomed India’s interest in joining APEC but no formal progress has been made.

    Highlights of APEC Summit 2023

    • Biden-Xi Meeting: The meeting between US President Biden and China’s President Xi Jinping is a significant highlight. While it may not result in immediate changes in US-China relations, it reflects ongoing high-level engagements.
    • Indo-Pacific Economic Framework (IPEF): The summit will focus on progress related to the Indo-Pacific Economic Framework (IPEF), initiated after the US withdrawal from the Trans-Pacific Partnership. Fourteen members, including Fiji and India, are part of the IPEF, with the rest being APEC members.

    Conclusion

    • The APEC Summit 2023 brings together leaders from the Asia-Pacific region to address economic and trade issues, with the Biden-Xi meeting and discussions on the IPEF among the key highlights.
    • Despite India’s historical interest in APEC, membership expansion remains a challenge, underscoring the importance of regional economic forums in shaping global economic policies and partnerships.

  • India’s 2+2 Ministerial Dialogues: Partnerships and Objectives

    2+2

    Central Idea

    • Indian Defence Minister and External Affairs Minister recently hosted their US counterparts for the fifth annual 2+2 Ministerial Dialogue in New Delhi.

    Understanding 2+2 Dialogues

    • Purpose: 2+2 dialogues involve the participation of high-level representatives, typically the Ministers of Foreign Affairs and Defence, from two nations. This format aims to expand the scope of dialogue and collaboration between these countries.
    • Rationale: Such dialogues enable comprehensive discussions on strategic concerns, mutual sensitivities, and political factors. They facilitate a deeper understanding of each other’s geopolitical perspectives and contribute to the development of stronger, more integrated strategic relationships in an ever-changing global environment.

    India’s 2+2 Partners

    • United States: The United States is India’s foremost and oldest partner in the 2+2 format. The inaugural 2+2 dialogue took place in September 2018 during the Trump Administration.
    • Australia: India engages in 2+2 meetings with Australia, further enhancing bilateral security and defence cooperation.
    • Japan: The 2+2 talks with Japan commenced in 2019, with the objective of bolstering strategic depth in security and defence cooperation.
    • United Kingdom: In October 2023, India initiated its first 2+2 dialogue with the United Kingdom, signifying the growing importance of this partnership.
    • Russia: India and Russia also engage in 2+2 dialogues, fostering a mutually beneficial understanding on various regional and international issues.

    Significance of 2+2 Dialogues

    • Defence and Strategic Agreements: These dialogues have led to significant bilateral agreements and partnerships. India and the United States, for instance, have signed Troika Pacts like:
    1. Logistics Exchange Memorandum of Agreement (LEMOA)
    2. Communications Compatibility and Security Agreement (COMCASA)
    3. Basic Exchange and Cooperation Agreement (BECA) for deep military cooperation.
    • Addressing Regional Concerns: In the face of common regional concerns, such as China’s increasing assertiveness, 2+2 dialogues have become vital mechanisms for India and its partners to align their strategic interests. This includes cooperation within the Quadrilateral Security Dialogue (QUAD) forum with Japan, Australia, and the United States.
    • Expanding Traditional Alliances: India also values its 2+2 dialogues with Russia, acknowledging shared worldviews and goals in promoting a multipolar world order.

    Conclusion

    • India’s participation in 2+2 Ministerial Dialogues with key global partners underscores its commitment to fostering robust and multifaceted strategic relationships.
    • These dialogues are pivotal in addressing regional and global challenges, strengthening military cooperation, and promoting shared interests in a dynamic world order.

  • Ben Gurion Canal Project: Joining Red Sea with Mediterranean

    Ben Gurion Canal Project

    Central Idea

    • Israel’s aspirations to gain full control over the Gaza Strip and eliminate Hamas may be linked to an ambitious economic opportunity—the creation of the Ben Gurion Canal Project.

    Ben Gurion Canal Project

    • Vision: Named after Israel’s founding father, David Ben-Gurion, the Ben Gurion Canal Project remains an ambitious infrastructure proposal.
    • Route: It envisions cutting a canal through the Negev Desert to connect the Gulf of Aqaba with the Eastern Mediterranean, challenging Egypt’s dominance over the Suez Canal.
    • History: A declassified 1963 US government memorandum explored the idea of using nuclear explosives for digging the canal.
    • Need: It would offer an alternative route to connect Europe and Asia, bypassing the Suez Canal.
    • Transformational Impact: If realized, this project could reshape global trade dynamics by breaking Egypt’s monopoly over the shortest trade route.

    Bypassing the Suez

    • Historical Significance: The Suez Canal, opened in 1869, revolutionized global maritime trade by reducing travel distances between Europe and Asia.
    • Congestion Issues: Despite expansion efforts, the Suez Canal remains congested, causing significant delays and economic losses.
    • Political Conflicts: Egypt’s control over the canal has led to conflicts and wars, impacting global geopolitics.

    Logistical and Political Challenges

    • Complexity and Cost: Building the Ben Gurion Canal is a massive and costly endeavour, potentially exceeding $100 billion.
    • Route Length: The proposed canal route is over 100 km longer than the Suez Canal, primarily due to terrain limitations.
    • Security Concerns: Constant military threats, such as Hamas rockets or Israeli attacks, would pose a significant challenge to the canal’s operation.

  • The U.S.’s signal of a huge digital shift

    Central idea

    The U.S. changed its digital trade stance, wanting more control over Big Tech and AI. China’s rise influenced this, creating a possible digital Cold War. Developing nations should make strong digital rules but avoid depending too much on the U.S. or China.

    Key Highlights:

    • The U.S. withdrawal from key digital trade positions at the WTO signifies a shift in global digital dynamics.
    • The move is prompted by the recognition of the need for domestic policy space to regulate Big Tech and AI, impacting data flows, source code, and computing facilities.
    • The China factor emerges as a significant reason behind the U.S. decision, as a digital Cold War scenario looms between the U.S. and China.

    Challenges:

    • The potential split of the global digital space into U.S. and China-led blocs poses challenges for countries caught in the crossfire.
    • Developing nations must navigate the risk of digital dependencies on either the U.S. or China, avoiding entanglement in a new form of digital Cold War.

    Key Phrases:

    • Digital colonisation and extractive nature.
    • Digital trade proposals as an agenda at plurilateral trade negotiations and the WTO.
    • The flat world concept and its evolution into a split digital world.

    Analysis:

    • The withdrawal is seen as a shift from the flat world narrative, with the U.S. adapting to a more complex digital landscape influenced by the rise of China.
    • The U.S. emphasis on preserving policy space for domestic regulation highlights the recognition of the importance of digital control in the era of Big Tech and AI.

    Key Data:

    • The U.S. withdrawal in late October from digital trade positions at the WTO.
    • China’s active participation in global digital trade negotiations and its potential to outsmart the U.S. digitally

    Key Terms to enrich your upsc mains answer:

    • Digital colonisation.
    • ICT4D (Information and Communication Technologies for Development).
    • Digital Cold War.
    • Digital industrial policies.
    • Global-scale interoperability.

    Way Forward:

    • Developing countries should leverage the global consensus on the need for strong digital regulations to shape new paradigms for national digital regulation.
    • Resistance against falling into a digital Cold War trap, emphasizing the creation of open global standards and digital public infrastructures for genuine global interoperability.

  • Indo-Pacific Maritime Domain Awareness (IPMDA) Initiative

    Central Idea

    • The Indo-Pacific Maritime Domain Awareness (IPMDA) initiative, recently unveiled by the Quad grouping (India, Australia, Japan, and the U.S.), underscores a shared commitment to uphold a free, open, inclusive, and rules-based Indo-Pacific.

    What is IPMDA Initiative?

    • IPMDA Initiative was announced at the Quad Leaders’ Summit in Tokyo, 2022.
    • It primarily aims to track dark shipping.
    • Dark ships are vessels with their Automatic Identification System (AIS) – a transponder system – switched off so as not to be detectable.
    • It focuses on tracking other tactical-level activities: to respond to climate and humanitarian events and to protect their fisheries, which are vital to many Indo-Pacific economies.

    Significance of IPMDA for India

    • IPMDA represents a substantial effort to bolster security and stability in the Indo-Pacific, a region of paramount global geopolitical significance.
    • India’s Navy, currently possessing over 140 ships and submarines, is on course to achieve a formidable fleet of 170 to 180 vessels by 2028.

    Lessons from Recent Events

    • Recent global events, including the border standoff with China in eastern Ladakh, conflicts in Ukraine, and turmoil in West Asia, underscore the need for resilience and readiness in the face of uncertainties.
    • Indian Navy recognizes the importance of integrated joint operations and a holistic approach to national defense, and a well-coordinated defense strategy involving all three Services.

  • What is Bletchley Park Declaration?

    Bletchley Park Declaration

    Central Idea

    • The recent AI Safety Summit held at Bletchley Park, the historic site of World War II code-breakers, brought together nations, computer scientists, and tech leaders to address the challenges and opportunities posed by artificial intelligence (AI).
    • India, a significant participant alongside countries like the US, UK, and China, played a pivotal role in shaping the global AI governance landscape.

    Bletchley Park Declaration

    • Global Agreement: The Bletchley Park Declaration aims to establish a shared understanding of the risks and opportunities posed by “frontier AI.”
    • Partners: The summit led to a groundbreaking agreement signed by 28 major countries, including India, the US, China, and the European Union.
    • Frontier AI Defined: Frontier AI refers to highly advanced generative AI models with potentially dangerous capabilities that can pose significant risks to public safety.

    India’s Stance

    • Global Action: India emphasized the importance of international cooperation to address AI risks effectively, aligning with the views of other participating nations.
    • Prioritizing Safety and Trust: Indian Minister of State for IT, Rajeev Chandrasekhar, highlighted the need to ensure that AI represents safety and trust. India’s perspective has evolved from initially hesitating to regulate AI to actively formulating risk-based regulations.
    • Global Framework: India’s PM had earlier called for a global framework on “ethical” AI tools, signalling a shift towards proactive regulation.

    Global Opinion on AI Governance

    • Diverse Responses: The AI policy response varies across nations. The EU has proposed a comprehensive AI Act, while the UK adopts a “light-touch” approach to foster innovation. The US positions itself between these extremes, focusing on safety and ethics.
    • Regulatory Scrutiny: Policymakers worldwide have increased regulatory scrutiny of generative AI tools, prompted by concerns related to privacy, bias, and intellectual property rights.

  • Pakistan’s Illegal Deportation of Afghan Refugees

    afghan refugee

    Central Idea

    • Pakistan’s government has recently implemented an order mandating the expulsion of all foreigners, with a significant impact on Afghan refugees, the largest refugee group in Pakistan.
    • This move has raised questions about the fate of Afghan migrants returning to a country facing numerous challenges, including a collapsed economy, natural disasters, food insecurity, and human rights issues under Taliban rule.

    Afghan Refugees in Pakistan

    • Historical Background: Afghan refugees have sought shelter in Pakistan since the late 1970s, primarily due to the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan in 1979. Subsequently, they fled during the Afghan civil war in the 1990s and the Taliban regime’s rule.
    • Afghan Refugee Population: Pakistan is home to over 4 million Afghans, with an estimated 1.7 million lacking proper documentation.
    • Deportation Deadline: The government set a deadline of October 31 for illegal migrants to leave Pakistan, after which they would face arrest and expulsion.
    • Deportation Process: Hours before the deadline, authorities began rounding up undocumented migrants, demolishing some homes to compel them to leave.
    • Border Crossings: Thousands of Afghans crossed into Afghanistan through border crossings, including Torkham and Chaman.

    Reasons for Deportation

    • Economic Concerns: Pakistan cites economic strain as a key reason for deportation, asserting that undocumented migrants who do not pay taxes strain its limited resources.
    • Security Concerns: Authorities claim that Afghan migrants have been involved in terror attacks, street crimes, and organized crimes like drug trafficking. They are accused of participating in attacks against the government and the army.
    • Political Timing: The deportation coincides with Pakistan’s caretaker government, insulating it from potential political or electoral repercussions.

    Refugee Convention,1951

    • The 1951 Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees is one of the cornerstone instruments of refugee protection. It defines who a refugee is and outlines their rights and responsibilities.
    • It also provides a non-refoulement principle, which prohibits states from returning refugees to a country where they would face persecution.
    • The 1967 Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees expanded the geographic scope of the 1951 Convention and removed the temporal and geographic limitations, making the Convention universally applicable.

    Challenges for Returnees

    • Uncertain Future: Afghan migrants returning to Afghanistan face an uncertain future amid economic collapse, earthquakes, food shortages, and human rights violations under Taliban rule.
    • Education and Employment: Women and girls returning to Afghanistan may be denied education and job opportunities.
    • US-Affiliated Migrants: Those who worked for the US before the Taliban’s takeover are particularly vulnerable.

    Taliban’s Response

    • Criticism and Request for Time: The Taliban has criticized the deportations and asked for more time to prepare for the returnees.
    • Humanitarian Efforts: Afghan authorities are establishing temporary camps near the border to provide food, shelter, healthcare, and SIM cards to returnees. The Taliban has expressed a willingness to assist them in finding jobs.

    Conclusion

    • This deportation is a contentious move driven by economic and security concerns.
    • The international community, including the Taliban, is grappling with the challenges posed by this situation, particularly as winter approaches and Afghanistan faces additional hardships.

  • Is the United Nations toothless in ending wars?

    Central idea 

    The article discusses the escalating conflicts in the Israel-Hamas and Russia-Ukraine situations, questioning the UN’s effectiveness in maintaining global peace. It highlights challenges such as the post-Cold War dilemma, erosion of the liberal order, and veto impasse, emphasizing the need for innovative conflict resolution mechanisms, UN reforms, and global public engagement to address the complexities in today’s geopolitical landscape.

    Key Highlights:

    • Escalating Conflicts: Israel-Hamas clashes intensify post-October 7 attack. Simultaneous Russia-Ukraine conflict adds global complexity.
    • Strategic Dialogue: Rakesh Sood and Vivek Katju discuss UN’s peacekeeping challenges. Moderated by Kallol Bhattacherjee, the dialogue addresses current geopolitical unrest.
    • Global Impact: UN’s role questioned in resolving modern conflicts. Increasing doubts about UN’s effectiveness in maintaining global peace.
    • Diverse Perspectives: Perspectives on the liberal international order and its alleged demise. Shift from unipolarity to multipolarity examined in the post-Cold War era.

    Challenges:

    • Post-Cold War Dilemma: Diminished UN conflict resolution post-Cold War. Major powers’ discord paralyzes UN decision-making.
    • Erosion of Liberal Order: Dispute over the existence of a liberal international rules-based order. Unipolar moment disappears by 2008, raising concerns.
    • Veto Impasse: UNSC’s efficacy hampered by veto powers. National interests obstruct addressing conflicts effectively.
    • Internal Israeli Complexities: Netanyahu’s divisive leadership influences Israel’s stance. Domestic protests and judicial reforms contribute to complexity.
    • Global Power Discord: Lack of consensus among major powers hinders UN efforts. Veto powers in the UNSC obstruct conflict resolution.
    • Nuances in Israel’s Approach: Israel’s response to Hamas extends beyond national security. Commitment to eliminating Hamas reflects deep resolve.
    • UN’s Passive Role: Criticism for UN’s passive role in recent conflicts. Major powers’ differences render the UN a bystander.
    • Shift to Multipolarity: Multipolarity after 2008 presents challenges. Multipolarity without multilateralism leads to chaos.

    Concerns:

    • Global Power Discord: Lack of consensus hinders UN’s conflict resolution. Veto powers impede the organization’s ability to act decisively.
    • Nuances in Israel’s Approach: Israel’s response to Hamas goes beyond national security. Commitment to eliminating Hamas reflects a profound resolve.
    • UN’s Passive Role: UN criticized for passive role in recent conflicts. Major powers’ differences render UN a bystander.
    • Shift to Multipolarity: Transition to a multipolar world after 2008 presents challenges. Multipolarity without effective multilateralism leads to chaos.

    Analysis:

    • Inert UN Dynamics: UN’s perceived ineffectiveness raises questions. Major powers’ disagreements cripple the UN’s active role.
    • Multipolarity Challenges: Emergence of a multipolar world introduces complexities. Lack of a new order suited for a multipolar world contributes to global unrest.
    • Strategic US Interventions: US interventions post-Cold War questioned for legitimacy. Iraq, Afghanistan, Mali, and Libya conflicts showcase UN’s limited role.
    • Dilemmas in Conflict Resolution: Complexities in resolving conflicts beyond traditional UN approaches. Calls for exploring alternative mechanisms acknowledging evolving geopolitical landscapes.

    Key Terms:

    • UN, Israel-Hamas conflict, Russia-Ukraine crisis, liberal international order, multipolarity, major powers, ceasefire.

    Way Forward:

    • Revamping Conflict Resolution: Urgency in exploring innovative conflict resolution mechanisms. Recognition of complexities beyond traditional UN paradigms in today’s geopolitical scenario.
    • India’s Global Role: Acknowledges India’s increasing global significance. Emphasizes the need for realistic expectations given the superior dynamics at play.
    • Multilateral Diplomacy: Strengthening multilateral diplomatic efforts for conflict resolution. Encouraging dialogue and cooperation among major powers to overcome discord.
    • UN Reforms: Advocating reforms in UN structures for increased agility. Addressing veto-related challenges to enhance the UN’s role in global peacekeeping.
    • Global Public Engagement: Fostering global public engagement in conflict resolution. Leveraging public sentiment to influence diplomatic decisions and encourage peaceful solutions.