💥Join UPSC 2027,2028 Mentorship (August Batch) + XFactor Notes & Microthemes PDF

Subject: Environment

  • SC panel on Aravallis must hear more people

    Why in the News?

    Civil society groups and mining affected communities have alleged that the Supreme Court appointed High Powered Committee (HPC) on the Aravallis left out several districts and did not adequately hear local people during its consultations. The dispute exposes the tension between expert led regulation of mining and genuine participation of the communities whose lands and livelihoods the decision will affect.

    What is the High Powered Committee on the Aravallis?

    1. Origin: The Supreme Court of India constituted a high-powered expert committee headed by Kanchan Devi to review the definition and delineation of the Aravalli hill range, guide mining regulations, and protect the fragile ecosystem from continuous environmental degradation.
    2. Mandate: It is to submit a report that will shape decisions on mining and conservation across the range, with an August 31 deadline.
    3. Consultation window: The panel held a 21 day period for stakeholders to submit comments, which has now ended.
    4. Field visits: It conducted field visits in Gurgaon, Alwar, Ajmer and Udaipur between 6 and 10 August.

    Why are activists challenging the consultation process?

    1. Villages left out: The Aravalli Virasat Jan Abhiyan claims the HPC did not visit any mining affected villages to understand ground realities.
    2. Urban centric hearings: Public hearings were held at urban centres that affected villagers could not reach, and information was not publicised in local newspapers, on radio, or at panchayat offices.
    3. Lobby dominance: Around 80 percent of representations in Ajmer were pro mining, with a similar pattern elsewhere, and those speaking against mining were allegedly threatened.
    4. Access failures: A scheduled Udaipur meeting for 10 August was moved to the evening of 9 August, making it hard for many to attend, and requested visits to villages hit by limestone mines and stone crushers did not happen.
    5. Central demand: The group wants the HPC to seek an extension of the August 31 deadline and hold meaningful consultations across all 64 districts in Delhi, Haryana, Rajasthan, Uttar Pradesh and Gujarat.

    What is an Eco Sensitive Zone?

    1. Definition: An Eco Sensitive Zone is an area notified around protected areas or ecologically fragile landscapes where activities such as mining are regulated or prohibited to act as a shock absorber.
    2. The National Wildlife Action Plan (2002-2016) recommended that State governments identify areas within 10 km of national parks and wildlife sanctuaries for declaration as Eco-Sensitive Zones (ESZs).
    3. The recommendation was to be implemented under the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986, under the framework of the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change (MoEFCC).
    4. Relevance: Regulation of mining in the Aravallis turns on how such protective boundaries and restrictions are drawn and enforced.

    Why does the Aravalli range matter for mining regulation?

    1. Ecological role: The Aravallis are India’s oldest mountain range and act as a barrier against desertification spreading eastward from the Thar.
    2. Mining pressure: Limestone mines, stone crushers and other extraction have degraded stretches of the range.
    3. Legal history: Courts have repeatedly intervened to restrict illegal and unregulated mining in the range.
    4. Livelihood stakes: Rural and Adivasi communities depend on the hills, so decisions affect both ecology and livelihoods.

    Why does the mining lobby versus affected communities tension shape the outcome?

    1. Capture risk: Hearings dominated by pro mining representations risk producing a report that understates ground level harm.
    2. Precedent invoked: Activists demand a systematic outreach approach similar to the one adopted a decade ago by the Western Ghats Ecology Expert Panel, which held direct public hearings.
    3. Intimidation: Alleged threats to those opposing mining undermine the credibility of the consultation.
    4. Deadline pressure: A fixed August 31 deadline discourages the fuller consultation the communities are demanding.

    Conclusion

    The current status is a contested consultation process, with affected communities demanding a deadline extension and direct village level hearings before the HPC finalises its report to the Supreme Court. The dispute turns on whether expert regulation of Aravalli mining can be legitimate without hearing the people most affected by it. The next milestone is whether the committee seeks an extension or submits its report by August 31 as scheduled.

    Back2Basics:

    Foundational Context: Mining in India

    1. About: Mining is the extraction of minerals from the earth and is regulated as a hazard prone activity with significant environmental impact.
    2. Scale: India produces a range of major and minor minerals, with states such as Rajasthan, Odisha and Jharkhand holding large reserves.
    3. Environmental impact: Mining causes deforestation, dust and air pollution, groundwater depletion, and land degradation.
    4. Governance: Mineral development is regulated under central law with clearances layered across environment, forest and pollution statutes.

    Statutory Framework Governing Mining and the Aravallis

    1. Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957: The principal law regulating the mining sector and grant of mineral concessions.
    2. Environment (Protection) Act, 1986: Enables environmental clearances and the notification of Eco Sensitive Zones.
    3. Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980: Requires clearance before diverting forest land for mining.
    4. Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981: Regulates dust and emissions from mining and crushing.
    5. National Green Tribunal Act, 2010: Provides the forum for adjudicating mining and environmental disputes.

    The Aravalli Range

    1. Designation: India’s oldest fold mountain range, running across Delhi, Haryana, Rajasthan and Gujarat.
    2. Location and extent: Stretches roughly 690 kilometres from Delhi to Gujarat, with Guru Shikhar as its highest peak.
    3. Ecological function: Acts as a natural barrier checking the eastward spread of the Thar desert and supports groundwater recharge.
    4. Distinguishing feature: Hosts unique biodiversity and forms the watershed for several rivers.
    5. Current concern: Threatened by illegal mining, stone crushing and encroachment.

    Government Initiatives for Aravalli and Land Restoration

    1. Aravalli Green Wall Project: Initiative to create a green belt along the range to combat land degradation and desertification.
    2. Compensatory Afforestation Fund: Funds afforestation to offset forest land diverted for mining and other uses.
    3. National Afforestation Programme: Supports regeneration of degraded forest land.
    4. Desertification action: India’s commitments under the United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification guide land restoration.

    Key Facts about the Aravallis and Mining

    1. Districts covered: The HPC’s mandate spans 64 districts across five states.
    2. Oldest range: The Aravallis are among the oldest mountain systems in the world.
    3. Deadline: The committee faces an August 31 report deadline.
    4. Precedent: The Western Ghats Ecology Expert Panel is cited as a model of participatory consultation.

    Challenges in Aravalli Conservation

    1. Illegal mining: Unregulated extraction continues despite court orders.
    2. Weak consultation: Affected rural and Adivasi communities are inadequately heard.
    3. Enforcement gaps: Overlapping jurisdictions weaken monitoring of mining bans.
    4. Encroachment: Construction and settlement erode the range.
    5. Desertification risk: Degradation of the range threatens its role as a desert barrier.
    6. Intimidation of activists: Reported threats deter local opposition to mining.

    Way Forward

    1. Direct village outreach: Hold public hearings in affected villages, not only urban centres.
    2. Extend timelines: Allow adequate consultation before finalising a decision of this scale.
    3. Strengthen enforcement: Deploy satellite monitoring and strict penalties against illegal mining.
    4. Protect participants: Ensure safety for community members opposing mining.
    5. Restore degraded land: Scale up afforestation and green wall efforts across the range.

    PYQ Relevance

    [UPSC 2025] Mineral resources are fundamental to the country economy and these are exploited by mining. Why is mining considered an environmental hazard? Explain the remedial measures required to reduce the environmental hazard due to mining.

    Linkage: The PYQ directly connects with the environmental hazards of mining and remedial measures for sustainable mineral extraction. The Aravalli case highlights illegal mining, ecological degradation, weak enforcement and the need for participatory conservation.

  • Centre relaxes construction hurdles in Ganga flood plain

    Why in the News?

    A gazette order of 10 August from the National Mission for Clean Ganga (NMCG) has removed the blanket declaration in the 2016 law that the Ganga flood plain is a construction free zone, replacing the total ban with a stratified, approval based regime. The change exposes the tension between protecting the river’s ecology and permitting development in areas subject only to moderate or rare flooding.

    What is the River Ganga Authorities Order that was amended?

    1. Instrument: The River Ganga (Rejuvenation, Protection and Management) Authorities Order, 2016, notified under the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986, governs protection and management of the river.
    2. Original ban: The 2016 order declared the bank of the river and its flood plain a construction free zone to reduce pollution and preserve natural groundwater recharge.
    3. What the amendment does: The 10 August order deletes the no construction clause and replaces the total ban with a regulated system in which some construction is permissible after official clearances.

    How does the new stratified definition of a flood plain work?

    1. Active flood plain: The zone immediately along the channel that submerges at least once every five years, where strict building prohibitions continue, with minor exceptions for temporary set ups such as religious events.
    2. Regulatory zone: The middle band subject to moderate flooding once every five to 25 years, where construction is now permissible subject to clearances.
    3. Warning zone: The outer periphery that floods only during severe events of 25 to 100 year frequency, where construction is also now permissible subject to clearances.
    4. Earlier gap: The 2016 order banned construction in the active flood plain but never defined what active meant, an inconsistency the amendment claims to correct.

    Why did the government amend the order?

    1. Stated rationale: A senior official said the amendment does not dilute standards but corrects an inconsistency in the law between the flood plain definition and the construction ban.
    2. Litigation pressure: Litigants had routinely cited the blanket construction free zone mandate against riverfront roads, embankments and sewage treatment plants before the National Green Tribunal.
    3. Scope limit: The new order does not grant blanket permission for development and keeps a regulated approval process in place.

    Does the change protect the river or dilute safeguards?

    1. The protection case: Confining strict prohibition to the active flood plain leaves the ecologically most sensitive channel margin protected while allowing regulated use elsewhere.
    2. The dilution concern: Opening the regulatory and warning zones to construction reduces the natural groundwater recharge and pollution buffer the 2016 order sought to preserve.
    3. Enforcement risk: An approval based system shifts protection from a clear legal bar to case by case clearances that depend on administrative capacity and vigilance.

    What are the challenges to regulating the Ganga flood plain?

    1. Encroachment pressure: Dense settlement and commercial demand along the river make flood plains attractive for construction.
    2. Weak demarcation: Flood plain zoning requires accurate hydrological mapping that is incomplete across the basin.
    3. Fragmented jurisdiction: Multiple states, municipal bodies and agencies share authority over the river, complicating uniform enforcement.
    4. Climate variability: Changing flood frequencies undermine fixed five, 25 and 100 year return period assumptions.
    5. Pollution load: Untreated sewage and industrial effluent continue to enter the river despite protection orders.

    Conclusion

    The amendment ends the 2016 blanket ban on flood plain construction and installs a three zone regime that permits regulated building beyond the five year flood line after clearances. The government frames this as correcting a legal inconsistency, while the ecological question is whether an approval based system can protect the river’s recharge and pollution buffer as effectively as an outright prohibition did. The next test lies in how clearances are granted and whether active flood plain protection holds against development pressure.

    Back2Basics:

    Foundational Context: Ganga Rejuvenation in India

    1. About: Ganga rejuvenation is a national programme to abate pollution and conserve and rejuvenate the river through sewage treatment, riverfront management and flow protection.
    2. Scale: The Ganga basin covers roughly one fourth of India’s land area and supports a large share of the population.
    3. Institutional design: The effort is coordinated by the National Mission for Clean Ganga under the National Ganga Council, with the Jal Shakti Ministry as the nodal ministry.
    4. Approach: It combines infrastructure such as sewage treatment plants with regulatory tools such as flood plain zoning and construction control.

    Statutory Framework Governing the Ganga

    1. Environment (Protection) Act, 1986: The parent statute under which the 2016 River Ganga Authorities Order and its amendment are notified.
    2. Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974: Establishes pollution control boards that regulate effluent discharge into the river.
    3. River Ganga (Rejuvenation, Protection and Management) Authorities Order, 2016: Creates the tiered institutional structure, including the National Ganga Council and NMCG, and governs flood plain regulation.
    4. National Green Tribunal Act, 2010: Constitutes the forum where flood plain and riverfront disputes are adjudicated.

    National Mission for Clean Ganga (NMCG)

    1. Nature: Implementation wing for Ganga rejuvenation and the Namami Gange programme.
    2. Governing framework: Registered as a society and given statutory backing through the River Ganga Authorities Order, 2016.
    3. Parent body: Functions under the National Ganga Council, chaired by the Prime Minister.
    4. Nodal ministry: Department of Water Resources, River Development and Ganga Rejuvenation under the Jal Shakti Ministry.
    5. Mandate: Ensures effective abatement of pollution and rejuvenation of the river by adopting a comprehensive, basin wide approach.

    Government Initiatives / Schemes for Ganga Rejuvenation

    1. Namami Gange Programme: Integrated conservation mission covering sewage treatment, riverfront development, afforestation and biodiversity.
    2. Arth Ganga: Model to build a sustainable economic bridge between the river and people through livelihoods, tourism and natural farming along the banks.
    3. Ganga Gram: Programme for sanitation and solid waste management in villages along the river.
    4. Jal Shakti Abhiyan: Water conservation campaign that supports groundwater recharge in the basin.

    Key Facts about the Ganga

    1. Length: The river runs roughly 2,525 kilometres from Gomukh to the Bay of Bengal.
    2. National River: The Ganga was declared India’s National River in 2008.
    3. Flood plain zones: The amended order recognises active, regulatory and warning zones based on five, 25 and 100 year flood frequencies.
    4. Dolphin link: The Gangetic dolphin, the National Aquatic Animal, depends on healthy river flow.

    Challenges in Ganga Conservation

    1. Sewage burden: A large volume of untreated urban sewage continues to reach the river.
    2. Industrial effluent: Tanneries and other industries discharge pollutants along the course.
    3. Reduced flow: Barrages, abstraction and diversion lower ecological flow in stretches.
    4. Flood plain encroachment: Construction and settlement erode the river’s natural buffer.
    5. Coordination gaps: Multiple states and agencies weaken uniform enforcement.
    6. Solid waste and religious use: Immersion waste and idol immersion add pollution loads.

    Way Forward

    1. Complete flood plain mapping: Finalise accurate zonation to make the three tier regime enforceable.
    2. Strengthen sewage treatment: Close the gap between sewage generated and treatment capacity.
    3. Ensure ecological flow: Mandate minimum environmental flows across barrages.
    4. Tighten clearance scrutiny: Apply strict, transparent conditions before approving construction in regulatory and warning zones.
    5. Empower basin governance: Reinforce NMCG and state bodies with clear enforcement powers.

    PYQ Relevance

    [UPSC 2015] Discuss the Namami Gange and National mission for clean Ganga (NMCG) programmes and causes of mixed results from the previous schemes. What quantum leaps can help preserve the river Ganga better than incremental inputs?

    Linkage: The PYQ directly connects with Ganga rejuvenation, conservation and the effectiveness of government interventions. The flood plain amendment highlights the challenge of balancing river conservation, pollution control and development pressures.

  • Agasthyamalai eviction orders still silence the Forest Rights Act

    Why in the News

    The Forest Department has issued eviction notices to thousands of households in the Agasthyamalai Biosphere Reserve (ABR) following a Supreme Court order for time-bound removal of forest encroachments. The issue highlights the tension between forest conservation and rights under the Forest Rights Act, 2006.

    What is the Forest Rights Act, 2006?

    • Full name: Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Act, 2006.
    • Recognises forest rights of Scheduled Tribes (STs) and other traditional forest dwellers.
    • Cut-off: Eligible occupation must pre-date 13 December 2005.
    • Claims are initiated and verified by Gram Sabhas and examined by higher-level committees.
    • Key safeguard: Eviction cannot take place until recognition and verification are completed.

    What is the Agasthyamalai Biosphere Reserve?

    • ABR: Agasthyamalai Biosphere Reserve.
    • Covers about 3,500 sq km across Tamil Nadu and Kerala.
    • Includes Kalakkad-Mundanthurai, Srivilliputhur-Megamalai and Periyar Tiger Reserves, along with wildlife sanctuaries.

    What is the Central Empowered Committee?

    • CEC: Central Empowered Committee.
    • Constituted under Supreme Court directions to monitor forest and environmental compliance.
    • It surveyed the Agasthyamalai landscape and reported violations involving non-forestry activities.

    Who are Other Traditional Forest Dwellers?

    • OTFDs: Other Traditional Forest Dwellers.
    • Non-tribal communities primarily dependent on forests for livelihood.
    • They must demonstrate three generations or 75 years of dependence before 13 December 2005.

    What did the Supreme Court order?

    1. Time-bound eviction plan, with rehabilitation where applicable.
    2. Legal action against wilful violators, including 118 government servants found to be encroachers.
    3. Ecological restoration after eviction.
    4. No new forest diversion or non-forest activity in ABR until encroachments are removed.
    5. Possible deployment of paramilitary forces for enforcement.

    Key Issue: Conservation vs Forest Rights

    • Conservation: Evictions aim to restore critical tiger habitat and remove non-forest activities.
    • Rights concern: Eviction before completion of FRA recognition and verification can violate statutory safeguards.
    • Data problem: Lack of reliable data on occupation outside FRA’s scope makes it difficult to distinguish genuine rights-holders from actual encroachers.

    Statutory Framework

    • FRA, 2006: Forest rights recognition.
    • FCA, 1980: Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980, regulates diversion of forest land.
    • WLPA, 1972: Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972, governs protected areas.
    • PESA, 1996: Panchayats (Extension to Scheduled Areas) Act, 1996, strengthens Gram Sabha powers in Scheduled Areas.
    • SC/ST PoA Act, 1989: Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.

    Back2Basics: Forest Rights Act

    • Nodal Ministry: Ministry of Tribal Affairs.
    • Beneficiaries: Forest-dwelling STs and eligible OTFDs.
    • Three rights: Individual forest rights, community rights and Community Forest Resource (CFR) rights.
    • Gram Sabha: Starting point for claims.
    • Key safeguard: No eviction before completion of recognition and verification.

    “[2021] At the national level, which ministry is the nodal agency to ensure effective implementation of the Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Act, 2006?

    (a) Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change

    (b) Ministry of Panchayati Raj

    (c) Ministry of Rural Development

    (d) Ministry of Tribal Affairs

  • Asiatic lion population rises from 523 (2015) to 891 (2025) under Project Lion

    Why in the News

    India’s Asiatic lion population increased from 523 in 2015 to 891 in 2025, the highest recorded count. Project Lion, launched in 2020, aims to strengthen conservation of the species and its Gir landscape.

    What is Project Lion?

    • Launched: 2020 for long-term conservation of the Asiatic lion.
    • Focus: Habitat improvement, disease surveillance, scientific monitoring and community participation.
    • Tools: Radio-collaring, camera traps and genetic/gene-pool conservation.
    • Need: The entire wild population is concentrated in one landscape, creating a major single-population risk.

    Latest Population Status

    • 2015: 523 lions
    • 2025: 891 lions
    • Key concern: Many lions now occur outside protected areas, increasing human-wildlife conflict.
    • Habitat: Gir is approaching its carrying capacity, strengthening the case for a second home.

    Back2Basics: Asiatic Lion

    • Scientific name: Panthera leo persica
    • IUCN: Endangered
    • CITES: Appendix I
    • Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972: Schedule I
    • Only wild population: India
    • Natural range: Gir landscape, Gujarat
    • Proposed second home: Barda Wildlife Sanctuary, Porbandar.

    Why is a Second Home Needed?

    1. Single-site risk: Disease or disaster in Gir could threaten the entire species.
    2. Habitat saturation: Increasing population is pushing lions beyond protected areas.
    3. Human-wildlife conflict: Greater interaction with people and livestock.
    4. Disease risk: Outbreaks such as Canine Distemper Virus (CDV) can threaten large carnivores.
    5. Habitat fragmentation: Mining, roads and railways can disrupt dispersal corridors.

    Statutory Framework

    • WLPA, 1972: Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972, provides legal protection to wildlife.
    • FCA, 1980: Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980, regulates forest diversion.
    • BDA, 2002: Biological Diversity Act, 2002, promotes conservation and sustainable use.
    • EPA, 1986: Environment (Protection) Act, 1986, provides the broader environmental framework.

    Government Initiatives

    • Project Lion (2020): Asiatic lion conservation.
    • Project Tiger (1973): Tiger conservation.
    • Project Elephant (1992): Elephant and corridor conservation.
    • Project Snow Leopard (2009): Snow leopard and Himalayan ecosystem conservation.
    • Integrated Development of Wildlife Habitats: Supports protected areas and endangered species recovery.

    [2019] Consider the following statements:

    1. Asiatic lion is naturally found in India only.

    2. Double-humped camel is naturally found in India only.

    3. One-horned rhinoceros is naturally found in India only.

    Which of the statements given above is / are correct?

    (a) 1 only

    (b) 2 only

    (c) 1 and 3 only

    (d) 1, 2 and 3

  • India’s first open-access ecoacoustic biodiversity dataset

    Why in the News

    Researchers have released India’s first open-access, crowdsourced ecoacoustic biodiversity dataset, capturing 518 species across 5,815 minutes of recordings from 25 states and union territories.

    What is ecoacoustics?

    1. Ecoacoustics is the study of sounds produced by organisms and the surrounding environment to understand ecosystems, biodiversity and ecological change.
    2. Instead of relying only on visual surveys, passive acoustic recorders can continuously capture:
      • Bird calls, Insect sounds, Frog and bat calls, Reptile and mammal vocalisations, Marine animal sounds, Background environmental sounds such as rain, wind and human activity

    Why does it matter?

    1. Non-invasive monitoring: Sound-based surveys track biodiversity cheaply and continuously across large areas.
    2. Open science: An open-access, crowdsourced dataset lets any researcher reuse the data for conservation.
    3. Baseline data: It creates a reference against which future biodiversity loss can be measured.

    [2023] Which of the following organisms perform waggle dance for others of their kin to indicate the direction and the distance to a source of their food?

    [A] Butterflies

    [B] )Dragonflies

    [C] Honeybees

    [D] Wasps

  • BNHS launches India’s first invasive-fish removal programme

    Why in the News

    The Bombay Natural History Society (BNHS) has launched India’s first community-driven removal programme for the invasive suckermouth catfish in Ujani Reservoir, Maharashtra.

    Suckermouth Catfish: Key Facts

    • Origin: Amazon River basin, South America.
    • Entry into India: Introduced through the aquarium trade and later released into natural waterways.
    • Local name: “Helicopter fish”.
    • Why invasive?
      • Feeds on fish eggs.
      • Competes with native bottom-feeding fish.
      • Burrows into riverbanks and can weaken earthen structures.
      • Adapts to adverse conditions.

    Scale of the Invasion

    • Around 97% of fish in Ujani are alien species including suckermouth catfish, Tilapia and African catfish.
    • Native fish account for only 3%.
    • Suckermouth catfish alone constitute around 30 to 40% of the total fish population.

    Impact on Fishermen

    • Around 20,000 people including fishermen, traders, transporters and labourers depend on the reservoir.
    • Invasive fish damage fishing nets and reduce the catch of economically valuable Rohu, Catla and Mrigal.
    • Fishermen may need to replace nets every 15 to 20 days, adding to costs.

    BNHS Removal Model

    • Collection centre established at Bhigwan fish market.
    • Fishermen receive financial incentives for collecting the invasive fish.
    • 36+ tonnes have already been removed.
    • Fish is processed into molasses used as fertiliser.
    • Creates a removal + livelihood + waste-utilisation model.

    “[2023] Invasive Species Specialist Group (that develops Global Invasive Species Database) belongs to which one of the following organizations?

    (a) The International Union for Conservation of Nature

    (b) The United Nations Environment Programme

    (c) The United Nations World Commission for Environment and Development

    (d) The World Wide Fund for Nature.

  • India’s Lepidoptera Diversity

    Why in the News?

    The Zoological Survey of India (ZSI) has published the Catalogue of Lepidoptera (Butterflies & Moths) of India in the peer-reviewed journal Zootaxa. The catalogue, prepared over nearly 12 years, provides an updated national inventory of India’s butterfly and moth diversity.

    Key Findings

    • India has 13,703 species of Lepidoptera.
    • This represents about 8.25% of the world’s known Lepidoptera.
    • Butterflies: 1,417 species
    • Moths: 12,286 species
    • These are distributed across: 3,705 genera, 240 subfamilies, 102 families, 31 superfamilies

    Geometroidea

    • 2,205 species of Geometroidea have been catalogued in India.
    • They belong to: 479 genera, 13 subfamilies, and 4 families
    • They constitute around 8.8% of the world’s known Geometroidea.
    • Many are nocturnal pollinators, complementing daytime pollinators such as butterflies.
    • Note: Geometridae is a very large family of slender-bodied, broad-winged moths.
  • Phoenix Species Project

    Why in the News

    The Phoenix Species Project, led by Re:wild and the Bezos Earth Fund with the IUCN Species Survival Commission, has launched a $200 million global initiative to recover 100 of the world’s most threatened species.

    What is the Phoenix Species Project?

    • Target: 100 species classified as Critically Endangered (CR) or Extinct in the Wild (EW) on the IUCN Red List.
    • Geographical spread: 30 countries.
    • Species covered: Mammals, birds, reptiles, amphibians, fish, invertebrates and plants.
    • Funding: $200 million
      • $100 million from Bezos Earth Fund
      • $100 million from Re:wild and supporting foundations.
    • Approach: Long-term, locally led species recovery rather than short-term conservation grants.

    Important species under the project

    • Bowmouth guitarfish: Threatened by the shark-fin trade; found in shallow waters from South Africa to Japan and Australia.
    • Hickory Nut Gorge green salamander: Restricted to a small canyon in North Carolina.
    • Charco Azul pupfish: Extinct in the wild; freshwater habitat was lost due to drought and water extraction.
    • Night parrot: Rare, nocturnal ground-dwelling bird of Australia’s arid regions.
  • Oil companies reject contamination claims against E20 petrol

    Why in the News

    Oil marketing companies rejected contamination allegations against E20 petrol after pan India testing, highlighting concerns over fuel quality, engine compatibility and consumer confidence.

    What is the Ethanol Blending Programme?

    • Objective: Reduce crude oil import dependence, improve energy security and support farmers.
    • E20: Petrol containing 20% ethanol.
    • India achieved the E20 blending target ahead of its earlier 2030 deadline.
    • Key Feedstocks: Sugarcane and molasses. Maize, and Surplus rice and other approved agricultural feedstocks

    Technical Trade-offs

    • Lower energy density: May reduce fuel economy.
    • Engine compatibility: Older vehicles may require compatible components.
    • Higher octane: Ethanol has a high octane rating and can improve combustion characteristics.

    “[2020] According to India’s National Policy on Biofuels, which of the following can be used as raw materials for the production of biofuels?
    1. Cassava
    2. Damaged wheat grains
    3. Groundnut seeds
    4. Horse gram
    5. Rotten potatoes
    6. Sugar beet
    Select the correct answer using the code given below:
    (a) 1, 2, 5 and 6 only
    (b) 1, 3, 4 and 6 only
    (c) 2, 3, 4 and 5 only
    (d) 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6

  • Ethanol policy must count in water, sustainability costs

    Why in the News

    India has achieved nearly 20% ethanol blending (E20) in petrol by 2025, making it one of the world’s largest biofuel programmes. As the blending target is achieved, attention is shifting from quantity to the programme’s water use, life cycle emissions and energy efficiency.

    What is the E20 Ethanol Blending Programme?

    1. Definition: E20 is petrol blended with 20% ethanol.
    2. Progress: Ethanol blending increased from about 1.5% in 2013-14 to nearly 20% in 2025, with annual consumption of around 700 crore litres.
    3. Benefits: Reduces crude oil imports, boosts farmers’ income and strengthens energy security. Ethanol is often described as a low-carbon fuel because sugarcane absorbs atmospheric carbon dioxide during growth.

    What is Energy Return on Energy Invested (EROEI)?

    1. Definition: EROEI measures the usable energy obtained from a fuel relative to the energy spent producing it.
    2. Sugarcane Ethanol: EROEI of about 2 to 4 due to efficient bagasse based distilleries.
    3. Grain Ethanol: EROEI ranges from 1.2 to 2 because of higher fossil fuel inputs.
    4. Significance: Higher EROEI indicates a more energy efficient fuel.

    Why is water the biggest concern?

    1. High Water Demand: Estimates by the Commission for Agricultural Costs and Prices and NITI Aayog suggest that sugarcane requires 1,500 to 2,500 mm of water during cultivation.
    2. Large Water Footprint: Producing one litre of sugarcane ethanol may consume 2,000 to 3,500 litres of water.
    3. Groundwater Stress: Major sugarcane growing states already face groundwater depletion.
    4. Resource Trade-off: Excessive ethanol production may replace oil dependence with freshwater dependence.
    5. Distorting Subsidies: Subsidised electricity and fertilisers encourage over extraction of groundwater and excessive fertiliser use. Subsidised urea promotes overuse of nitrogen fertilisers.

    What are the other challenges?

    1. Lower Energy Density: Ethanol contains about 21 MJ/litre, compared to 32 MJ/litre for petrol, reducing fuel efficiency by about 6 to 7% under E20 blends. However, ethanol has a much higher octane rating, allowing engines specifically calibrated for higher ethanol blends to achieve more efficient combustion and partially offset this disadvantage. The overall outcome depends on engine design rather than fuel properties alone.
    2. Life Cycle Emissions: Sugarcane ethanol can reduce emissions by 50 to 70%, while grain ethanol offers 20 to 50% reduction, depending on production methods.
    3. Vehicle Compatibility: E20 can corrode certain engine components in older vehicles. Vehicles manufactured from April 2023 onwards are required to be E20 compatible.

    Conclusion

    India’s ethanol programme represents an important step towards greater energy security, but its long-term success will depend on aligning environmental objectives with sound economics. A resilient biofuel strategy must be guided by transparent life-cycle carbon accounting, rigorous assessment of water use, technology-neutral incentives and market signals that reflect the true value of natural resources.

    PYQ Relevance

    [2020] According to India’s National Policy on Biofuels, which of the following can be used as raw materials for the production of biofuels?
    1. Cassava

    2. Damaged wheat grains

    3. Groundnut seeds

    4. Horse gram

    5. Rotten potatoes

    6. Sugar beet
    Select the correct answer using the code given below:
    (a) 1, 2, 5 and 6 only (b) 1, 3, 4 and 6 only (c) 2, 3, 4 and 5 only (d) 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6