Tit-bits for prelims (what do you think)

Hello everyone

As prelims is not more than 80 days away, we thought of different ways of helping you in your preparation. In this context UW announced a test series on the forum. Now to help you with the factual stuff, we came up with the idea of presenting confusing and important factoids in card format which would be linked to a subject in the story. You can revise them and discuss them on website.

For instance

Polity Tit-bits

High Court

  • High court judges are appointed and removed by president not the governor
  • salary is charged on consolidated fund of states while pension on CFI
  • Writ jurisdiction under article 226 is wider than that of supreme court’s under article 32
  • There are 24 high courts in India

Discuss– logic behind these provisions and name the high courts which have jurisdiction over more than 1 state or UT

Supreme court

  • A distinguished jurist can be appointed to supreme court but not high court
  • Only parliament not president can increase the number of judges
  • A person can directly approach supreme court under art 32
  • President can seek advice under article 143, supreme court not bound to advise, president not bound to accept the advise

Discuss– Under what conditions, supreme court is duty bound to tender the advise to president?

Do let us know, what you think about the initiative in comment section. If good enough number of aspirants want it, we would start pushing 4-5 such cards every day in the app or on the forum.

It takes lots of time to design such stuff, so feel free to write your opinion. Do let us know if you want any changes etc. We would start it only if you recommend it.

CategoriesUncategorized
  • Subscribe

    Do not miss important study material