💥Join UPSC 2027,2028 Mentorship (August Batch) + XFactor Notes & Microthemes PDF
Talk to Mentor

Civilsdaily

Login

GS Paper: Poverty & Development Issues

  • Bhopal’s new order criminalising begging

    Why in the News?

    Recently, the Bhopal district collector banned begging in the district and imposed strict rules, including filing police cases against both those who beg and those who give alms.

    What legal basis is Bhopal using to criminalize begging?

    • Section 163 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023: The orders by the collectors of Indore and Bhopal are under this section, which empowers officials like the District Magistrate or any Executive Magistrate to issue orders in urgent cases of nuisance or apprehended danger. This order can direct any person to abstain from a certain act and may apply to residents or the public frequenting a particular area.
    • Section 223 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS): Action will be taken under this section, which punishes those disobeying an order announced by a public servant lawfully empowered to do so.

    What are the penalties for violating the order?

    • Disobedience of the order can result in simple imprisonment for up to six months, a fine of up to Rs 2500, or both.
    • If the disobedience causes or tends to cause danger to human life, health, or safety, imprisonment can extend to one year, and the fine to Rs 5000.

    How have different regions in India approached the issue?

    • Bombay Prevention of Beggary Act, 1959:  The first law against begging, with colonial roots, aimed to clear streets of destitute persons, leprosy patients, or those with mental illnesses by sending them to institutions. Mumbai still has detention centres under this Act, allowing police to detain those without visible means of subsistence, with punishment extending to detention for 10 years.
    • Delhi High Court (2018) Struck down some sections of the Bombay Prevention of Beggary Act as unconstitutional, decriminalizing begging in Delhi. The court stated that people beg out of need, as a last resort for survival, and the government has a mandate to provide social security3.
    • Other States Many states, including Maharashtra, continue to criminalise begging under the Bombay Prevention of Beggary Act. There is no central act on begging, but many states have enacted their own laws based on the 1959 Act.
    • Rehabilitation Efforts In 2020: the Union Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment proposed focusing on rehabilitation rather than criminalising begging in ten cities, including Mumbai

    How have different regions in India approached the issue?

    • State-Level Criminalization: Around 22 states and union territories have anti-begging laws, many modeled after the Bombay Prevention of Begging Act, 1959, which criminalizes begging, vagrancy, and soliciting alms, allowing arrest without a warrant.
      • States like Haryana, Punjab, Uttar Pradesh, and others have enacted similar laws.
    • Decriminalization Efforts & Judicial Interventions: The Delhi High Court (2018) struck down parts of the Bombay Prevention of Begging Act as unconstitutional, decriminalizing begging in Delhi. The Supreme Court (2021) also refused to ban begging nationwide, recognizing that criminalizing it unfairly targets the poor. Rajasthan has taken a more rehabilitative approach.

    What are the arguments for and against criminalizing begging?

    Arguments in favour: 

    • Curbing Organized Begging Rackets – Criminalization helps tackle forced begging, where vulnerable individuals, including children and disabled people, are exploited by criminal networks.
    • Public Safety and Order – Authorities argue that begging creates nuisance, disrupts traffic, and can lead to petty crimes, making public spaces unsafe.
    • Encouraging Rehabilitation – Some laws claim to detain beggars for rehabilitation, ensuring they receive food, shelter, and vocational training instead of relying on alms.

    Argument against: 

    • Violation of Fundamental Rights – Criminalizing begging punishes poverty, not crime, violating the right to life (Article 21) by penalizing individuals who have no means of survival.
    • State’s Failure in Social Security – The presence of beggars reflects gaps in government welfare, and punishing them shifts the burden away from state accountability.
    • Arbitrary and Unjust Implementation – Many laws allow arrests without warrants, disproportionately targeting the homeless, disabled, and elderly, rather than addressing systemic issues.

    Way forward: 

    • Rehabilitation-Centered Approach – Shift focus from criminalization to social welfare programs, including skill development, housing, mental health support, and reintegration into society.
    • Legislative Reforms & Judicial Oversight – Enact a uniform national policy that prioritizes rehabilitation over punishment, while ensuring judicial oversight to prevent misuse of anti-begging laws.

    Mains question for practice:

    Q Critically examine the rationale behind criminalizing begging in India. Discuss the legal and constitutional challenges associated with such measures. (250 words) 15M

  • [30th January 2025] The Hindu Op-ed: Bridge the milk divide for a nutritionally secure India

    PYQ Relevance:

    Q.) How far do you agree with the view that the focus on the lack of availability of food as the main cause of hunger takes the attention away from ineffective human development policies in India? (CS Mains 2018)

     

    Mentor’s Comment: UPSC Mains has always focused on the main cause of hunger (2018) and poverty and hunger in India (2019).

    India’s White Revolution made it the world’s top milk producer, but now the focus should shift to ensuring milk reaches the most vulnerable. Milk is an important source of protein and calcium, especially for children. However, there are significant differences in milk consumption across income groups and regions. Addressing these gaps is crucial for better health outcomes.

    Today’s editorial discusses how milk should be accessible to everyone in India and highlights the differences in milk availability. It looks at how these issues are connected to topics in GS Paper 1, 2, and 3, such as social inequalities, health, and policy solutions. 

    _

    Let’s learn!

    Why in the News?

    The challenge is making sure that the most vulnerable people have fair access to milk, while also controlling how much milk is consumed by wealthier people.

    What is the disparity in milk consumption? 

    • Income-Based Disparities: Households in the top-income decile consume 3-4 times more milk per capita compared to those in the lowest-income decile. Despite increases in milk consumption among lower-income groups, the poorest 30% account for just 18% of India’s milk.
    • Urban vs. Rural and Regional Disparities: Urban households consume ~30% more milk per capita than rural households, despite rural areas being the main milk producers.
      • Additionally, northern states like Rajasthan, Punjab, and Haryana have higher consumption (333g-421g), while eastern states like Chhattisgarh, Odisha, and West Bengal have much lower consumption (75g-171g).
    • Social Group Disparities: Scheduled Tribe households consume 4 litres less milk per capita annually compared to general category households, highlighting social and economic inequalities in milk access.

    What are the nutritional implications of milk consumption in India?

    • Protein Source: Milk is a rich source of high-quality protein. In India, it contributes significantly to daily protein intake, especially for children and adults in rural areas. According to the National Family Health Survey (NFHS), over 70% of children in India consume milk, making it a key protein source.
    • Calcium and Bone Health: Milk provides essential calcium, which is vital for bone health. Around 67% of Indian households consume milk, helping to prevent calcium deficiency, particularly in growing children and elderly populations, which can lead to conditions like osteoporosis.
    • Micronutrients and Vitamin D: Milk is also a good source of vitamins such as B12 and D, essential for immune function and energy production. The National Institute of Nutrition (NIN) states that milk helps in reducing vitamin D deficiency, which is prevalent in India due to limited sunlight exposure.

    How can policy interventions address disparities in milk production and access?

    • Enhancing Milk Provision: Increase milk availability for vulnerable populations through government schemes like the Pradhan Mantri Poshan Shakti Nirman (POSHAN) and Integrated Child Development Services. States can collaborate with nutrition institutes to align milk products with local dietary preferences.
    • Financial Support: Boost financial allocations for existing schemes to ensure adequate milk provision, especially in states where such programs have been discontinued due to budget constraints.
    • Nutritional Awareness Campaigns: Conduct awareness campaigns focusing on the benefits of milk consumption, targeting women through various community channels. This can help improve dietary diversity within households.

    What strategies can be implemented to promote sustainable dairy practices?

    • Healthy Consumption Awareness: Develop partnerships with healthcare professionals and media to promote balanced diets and moderation in dairy consumption among affluent groups.
      • For example, Campaigns similar to the UK’s Change4Life initiative could serve as effective models for India.
    • Investing in Dairy Infrastructure: The government should continue investing in dairy infrastructure, including animal health care and fodder availability, to ensure sustainable production practices while improving yields.
    • Community Engagement: Engage local communities in sustainable practices through education and training programs aimed at improving animal husbandry practices and enhancing productivity without compromising environmental sustainability.

    What are the steps taken by the government? 

    • Rashtriya Gokul Mission: This initiative focuses on enhancing the genetic quality of bovine animals through the identification and use of high-quality bulls for breeding, in-vitro fertilization (IVF) technology, and genomic selection. It aims to improve milk production by covering millions of livestock and providing better healthcare services for animals.
    • National Dairy Plan (NDP): The NDP supports the establishment of dairy cooperatives and processing facilities to enhance milk marketing and value addition. It includes financial assistance for creating dairy processing infrastructure, thereby improving the overall efficiency and competitiveness of the dairy sector.
    • Kisan Credit Card (KCC) Facility: This scheme offers credit support to farmers for various agricultural activities, including dairy farming. By providing financial assistance, the KCC aims to empower smallholder farmers to invest in their livestock and improve milk production capabilities.

    Way forward: 

    • Increase Access for Vulnerable Groups: Expand milk distribution through government schemes (e.g., POSHAN and ICDS) and ensure adequate funding to cover vulnerable populations.
    • Regional and Social Equity: Implement targeted interventions to reduce regional, income, and social disparities in milk access, such as milk coupons or subsidies for underserved areas.

  • Is poverty being underestimated in India?

    Why in the News?

    The government recently published a factsheet on the 2023-24 Household Consumption Expenditure Survey (HCES), highlighting a reduction in poverty levels across both urban and rural areas.

    What are the key findings of the report? 

    • Average MPCE and Imputed Values: In 2023-24, the average Monthly Per Capita Expenditure (MPCE) was Rs. 4,122 in rural areas and Rs. 6,996 in urban areas, excluding the value of free items provided through social welfare schemes.
    • Growth in MPCE and Urban-Rural Gap: Compared to 2022-23, the MPCE in nominal terms grew by approximately 9% in rural areas and 8% in urban areas. The urban-rural MPCE gap narrowed from 84% in 2011-12 to 71% in 2022-23, further declining to 70% in 2023-24, indicating robust consumption growth in rural areas.
    • Consumption Trends by Population Segments: The highest increase in MPCE in 2023-24, compared to 2022-23, was observed among the bottom 5-10% of India’s population, for both rural and urban households.
    • Composition of Expenditure: Non-food items accounted for 53% of rural MPCE and 60% of urban MPCE in 2023-24. Within the food basket, beverages, refreshments, and processed foods dominated expenditure, while in the non-food category, conveyance, clothing, entertainment, and durable goods were significant contributors. Urban households also allocated about 7% of non-food expenditure to rent.
    • Decline in Consumption Inequality: The rural Gini coefficient dropped from 0.266 in 2022-23 to 0.237 in 2023-24, and the urban coefficient fell from 0.314 to 0.284 during the same period.
    Note: The Gini coefficient is a statistical measure used to quantify income or consumption inequality within a population, ranging from 0 (perfect equality) to 1 (maximum inequality).

    What are the concerns related to the HCES data?

    • Incomparability of Data Sets: The methodology used in the 2022-23 HCES differs significantly from previous surveys, making it difficult to compare results over time. The introduction of a “modified mixed reference period” complicates direct comparisons with earlier data collected under different methodologies.
    • Sampling Bias: There are concerns that the survey may not adequately represent extremely poor households, leading to an overestimation of average expenditures. This bias could arise from changes in sampling strategies that favor more affluent households.
    • Data Availability Issues: The absence of recent and reliable consumption data prior to the 2022-23 survey has led to a reliance on outdated estimates, which may not accurately reflect current poverty levels. The last comprehensive survey before this was conducted in 2011-12.

    What does the consumption pattern tell about poverty in rural and urban regions?

    • Divergent Poverty Levels: The average monthly per capita expenditure (MPCE) indicates significant disparities between rural and urban areas, with rural areas averaging Rs 4,122 and urban areas Rs 6,996 in 2023-24. This suggests that urban populations generally have higher consumption levels.
    • Survival on Minimal Incomes: Reports indicate that a substantial portion of India’s population survives on less than Rs 100 per day, highlighting persistent poverty despite claims of decline. This raises questions about the adequacy of the poverty line used for estimation.

    What are the criticisms faced by the Multidimensional Poverty Index?

    NITI Aayog, the policy think tank of the Government of India, adopted the Multidimensional Poverty Index (MPI) as a measure to evaluate poverty in India.

    • Methodological Concerns: Critics argue that the MPI’s reliance on equal weighting for health, education, and living standards may oversimplify the complexities of poverty. The selection of indicators can significantly influence outcomes, potentially leading to biased representations.
    • Dynamic Nature of Poverty: The MPI may not adequately capture the fluidity and changing nature of poverty over time, as it relies on static indicators that do not reflect immediate economic conditions or shocks such as those experienced during the COVID-19 pandemic.
    • Political Implications: Some economists suggest that using MPI as a primary measure for poverty could be politically motivated, aiming to present favourable statistics while ignoring deeper economic issues such as stagnant real wages and rising inequality.

    Way forward: 

    • Strengthen Data Collection: Conduct regular and comprehensive Household Consumption Expenditure Surveys (HCES) to ensure updated and accurate poverty assessments. This will bridge data gaps and provide a more reliable basis for policy decisions.
    • Refine Poverty Metrics: Combine the Multidimensional Poverty Index (MPI) with traditional consumption-based measures to capture a holistic and dynamic picture of poverty, accounting for region-specific and pandemic-induced challenges.

    Mains PYQ:

    Q “The incidence and intensity of poverty are more important in determining poverty based on income alone”. In this context analyse the latest United Nations Multidimensional Poverty Index Report. (UPSC IAS/2020)

  • [16th January 2025] The Hindu Op-ed: Social justice and a lost chance by a Prime Minister

    PYQ Relevance:

    Q) Performance of welfare schemes that are implemented for vulnerable sections is not so effective due to absence of their awareness and active involvement at all stages of the policy process. Discuss. (UPSC CSE 2019)

    Mentor’s Comment:

    UPSC mains have previously focused on topics like ‘Concept of Social Justice’ (2016) and ‘Implementation of Social Justice’ (2019 & 2021).

    The India Justice Report (IJR) 2022 emphasizes that effective leadership is crucial for fostering social justice by ensuring equitable access of resource allocation, infrastructure, and diversity within policy  and decision making. ‘Social justice’ involves not only addressing economic inequalities but also ensures access to education, healthcare, and political representation.
    Today’s editorial likely addresses several critical questions regarding the role of leadership in promoting social justice with respect to legislative reforms, social welfare programs, or policy decisions. This content can be used to present rational thinking for the future scope of the Socio-political nexus while addressing Social justice.

    _

    Let’s learn!

    Why in the News?

    There are ongoing discussions about the state of liberalism and democratic values in both India and the United States. 

    • The recent political developments, such as shifts toward more nationalist or populist policies, have prompted reflections on the historical context of leadership (Barack Obama and Manmohan Singh’s) during a time when liberalism seemed more robust.
    • Additionally, this editorial serves as a reminder of the challenges both countries face in maintaining democratic principles and fostering inclusivity, particularly as political climates evolve.

    What were the historical paradoxes of Political Elections during 2004?

    The 2004 Elections embodies two significant paradoxes that highlight the vibrancy of Indian democracy. 

    • The Anti-Sikh riots of 1984 represented a dark period for Indian pluralism, yet two decades later, a Sikh became Prime Minister, reflecting a remarkable shift in societal acceptance among the majority Hindu population. 
    • The 2004 election was a rejection of market celebration, despite Singh being a proponent of economic liberalization (he was compelled to adhere to a welfarist agenda shaped by democratic pressures).
    Indian pluralism refers to the rich diversity and coexistence of various cultural, religious, linguistic, and social groups within the country. It embodies the idea that multiple identities can thrive together in a single nation, contributing to a vibrant and dynamic society. 

    What specific actions or policies have been missed that could have advanced social justice?

    • Coalition Dynamics: After the 2009 elections, the coalition was restructured, excluding subaltern representatives from the Hindi belt. Key figures held significant power, minorities were represented throughout the offices. The expulsion of subaltern castes in 2009 by Congress managers contributed to a political shift.
    • Political Control: The presence of religious minorities and upper caste Hindus at the top levels of power may have alienated Other Backward Classes (OBC) and Dalits, leading to their support for the 2014 elections. This dynamic mirrors trends observed in U.S. politics around the same period.
    • Indecision and Social Justice Agenda: In 2005, SC Ruling questioned state authority to enforce reservation policies in private educational institutions. As Minister of Human Resource Development, Arjun Singh sought to amend the Constitution to allow reservations in both aided and unaided private institutions.
      • The Anti-Reservation Movement was sparked in northern India while southern regions remained calm. 
      • HRD Minister drafted a proposal for OBC quotas in government institutions and private ones. During this time, Dr. Manmohan Singh had instructed that the bill for private institutions be shelved, focusing only on government quotas.
      • Further, the Sachar Committee was established to study the socio-economic conditions of Muslims, further fueling discussions on social justice.
      • Hence, the tension between secularism and social justice during Manmohan Singh’s leadership ultimately limited the UPA’s promise for progress due to indecisiveness on many issues.

    How does the current political climate affect the pursuit of social justice?

    • Deepening Rivalries: The rivalry between the major parties has been intensified, leading to a lack of constructive dialogue necessary for addressing social justice issues.
      • This hostility hampers collaboration on policies aimed at marginalized communities. One of the current examples can be the formation of the All India Federation for Social Justice (AIFSJ).
    • Contentious Legislation: Upcoming controversial legislation, such as the Constitution Amendment Bill for synchronizing elections and the regulation of Wakf properties, may further polarize political discourse and distract from social justice initiatives.
    • Focus on Women Voters: Political parties are increasingly recognizing women as a crucial voter base, with promises of financial support aimed at empowering them.
      • This focus could lead to greater demands for social justice from women voters, impacting policy decisions.
    Did you know?

    John Rawls’s concept of social justice, particularly in the Indian context, emphasizes that a fair and just societal framework can only be achieved if individuals envision themselves in a scenario where they must make decisions about societal organization without knowing their future position within that society. This thought experiment is encapsulated in what Rawls calls the “veil of ignorance.“

    Under this veil, individuals are entirely unaware of their potential status or role in society, which prevents them from making decisions based solely on personal interests. Instead, they would consider the implications of their choices for everyone, particularly focusing on the most disadvantaged members of society. By doing so, they ensure that the principles they establish will be beneficial for all, especially those who are worst off, thereby promoting a more equitable future.

    Way Forward: The interplay between political rivalries, legislative challenges, and economic conditions creates a complex environment for advancing social justice in India. While there are initiatives aimed at empowerment, the overall climate may hinder meaningful progress unless collaborative efforts are prioritized.

  • The right to food and the struggle with the PDS

    Why in the News?

    Bureaucratic problems have caused many households in northern, central, and eastern India to be taken off the PDS rolls.

    How effectively does the PDS ensure food security for vulnerable populations?

    • Food Access and Coverage: The PDS covers approximately 57% of the population, providing subsidized staples primarily rice and wheat. This system acts as a safety net during economic shocks and has played a crucial role during crises like the COVID-19 pandemic by distributing free food grains to millions.
    • Leakages and Corruption: A staggering 28% of allocated food never reaches intended beneficiaries, translating into significant losses and exacerbating food insecurity among the poor.
      • Corruption and illegal diversion of food grains are rampant, with reports indicating that high leakage rates persist despite technological interventions like point-of-sale machines.
    • Nutritional Security: While the PDS provides basic food staples, it often neglects broader nutritional needs. The focus on rice and wheat means that other essential items, such as pulses and fortified foods, are not consistently included, which is crucial for combating malnutrition among vulnerable populations.

    Case study: 

    The Public Distribution System (PDS) is intended to provide food security to vulnerable populations, but reports indicate significant inefficiencies. In states like Jharkhand, Odisha, and Bihar, a substantial number of households have been removed from PDS rolls, exacerbating food insecurity among marginalised communities such as the Musahar community.

    What are the key documentation challenges facing the implementation of the PDS?

    • Unnecessary Documentation: The PDS requires documents like caste, income, and residence certificates, which are not mandated by the NFSA or PDS control orders, creating barriers for individuals who lack or cannot easily obtain them.
    • Inclusion and Exclusion Errors: Errors in beneficiary identification result in eligible households being excluded (61%) and ineligible ones receiving benefits (25%), undermining the system’s fairness.
    • Biometric Verification Challenges: Biometric failures and data discrepancies lead to eligible individuals being removed from PDS rolls, forcing them to reapply without guarantees of approval.
    • Awareness Gap: Marginalized communities often lack knowledge about their rights and the application process, leading to underutilization of benefits and increased vulnerability to exploitation.
    • Technological Barriers: The shift to online applications disadvantages individuals without internet access or digital literacy, widening the gap in accessing entitlements.
    • Ghost Beneficiaries: The issuance of ration cards to non-existent individuals (“ghost cards”) due to poor data management and irregular updates creates inefficiencies and complicates the system.

    What are the bureaucratic challenges? 

    • Exclusion Due to Ineffective Targeting: The move to a targeted PDS has resulted in many eligible households being excluded due to bureaucratic inefficiencies in identifying the right beneficiaries.
    • Complicated Documentation Process: The need for documents like caste and income certificates creates obstacles for many eligible individuals, particularly in marginalised communities, leading to their exclusion from the system.
    • Issues with Biometric Verification: The mandatory biometric verification has caused problems, with many individuals being removed from PDS rolls due to technical errors or discrepancies, forcing them to reapply without certainty of approval.
    • Poor Data Management: Inadequate beneficiary list management has led to both inclusion and exclusion errors, with outdated records and ghost beneficiaries making it difficult for genuine recipients to access their food entitlements.
    • Corruption and Mismanagement: Corruption within the PDS, such as the diversion of food grains and mismanagement at various levels, has caused significant portions of allocated food to not reach the intended beneficiaries.

    What reforms are necessary to enhance the PDS and uphold the right to food? (Way forward)

    • Streamlining Documentation Requirements: Simplifying or eliminating unnecessary documentation can help improve access for eligible households.
    • Enhancing Transparency and Accountability: Implementing regular audits and community monitoring can help combat corruption within the system.
      • Increased transparency in operations will ensure that resources reach those who need them most.
    • Expanding Nutritional Offerings: Including a wider variety of food items in the PDS can address nutritional deficiencies among vulnerable populations.
      • States like Tamil Nadu have successfully incorporated pulses and fortified rice into their distribution systems, serving as models for others.
    • Digitalization and Grievance Redressal: Improving digital infrastructure while ensuring robust grievance redressal mechanisms can enhance efficiency and accountability within the PDS.

    Mains PYQ:

    Q What are the major challenges of Public Distribution System (PDS) in India? How can it be made effective and transparent? (UPSC IAS/2022)

  • The number of domestic migrants is estimated to have lowered by 12% since 2011: EAC-PM

    Why in the News?

    A report by the PM’s Economic Advisory Panel (EAC-PM) indicates that the number of domestic migrants has decreased by approximately 12%, reaching 40.20 crore since 2011 census.

    Internal/Domestic migration refers to the movement of people within a country from one region to another.

    • Reasons for Push factors: Lack of job opportunities, natural disaster, lack of quality education and healthcare facilities, etc.
    • Reasons for Pull factors: Economic opportunities, higher standard of living, peace and stability, etc.

    What is Prime Minister’s Economic Advisory Panel (EAC-PM)?

    • The Economic Advisory Council to the Prime Minister (EAC-PM) is an independent advisory body established to provide economic insights and recommendations to the Government of India, specifically to the Prime Minister.
    • The term “independent advisory body” refers to a group that provides expert advice and recommendations without being subject to direct control or influence from the government or any political entity. The Prime Minister of India has the authority to appoint the members of the EAC-PM.

    What are the key findings of the Prime Minister’s Economic Advisory Panel (EAC-PM) report?

    • Decline in Domestic Migrants: The number of domestic migrants in India is estimated to have decreased by approximately 12% from 45.57 crore in 2011 to 40.20 crore in 2023, indicating a shift in migration trends and possibly improved local opportunities.
    • Migration Rate and Dynamics: The migration rate has dropped from 37.64% of the total population in 2011 to an estimated 28.88% in 2023, reflecting a significant change in the dynamics of internal migration.
      • Short-distance migration is predominant, with distance negatively affecting labor mobility.
      • Migration originates primarily from areas around major urban centers like Delhi, Mumbai, Chennai, Bangalore, and Kolkata.
    • Major Migration areas: UP-Delhi, Gujarat-Maharashtra, Telangana-AP, Bihar-Delhi (state level).
    • Data Sources: The report utilized high-frequency data from various sources, including the Indian Railway Unreserved Ticketing System, mobile phone roaming data, and district-level banking data, to analyze migration patterns.
    • Changing Migration Patterns: The report highlights that states like West Bengal and Rajasthan have emerged as significant destinations for migrants, while states like Andhra Pradesh and Bihar have seen a decline in their rankings as migrant sources.

    What are the reasons for the decline in migrant numbers?

    • Improved Local Opportunities: The decline in domestic migration is hypothesized to be due to enhanced economic opportunities and services such as education, healthcare, infrastructure, and connectivity available in or near major sources of migration. This suggests that individuals may be finding sufficient opportunities locally rather than migrating.
    • Short-Distance Migration Dominance: The report indicates that short-distance migrations account for a significant share of overall migration, suggesting that individuals prefer to migrate within closer proximities rather than long distances.

    What are the present steps taken for the welfare of Domestic Migrants in India?

    • Social Security Programs: The Indian government has established various welfare schemes aimed at providing social security to migrant workers. Notable among these are:
      • Pradhan Mantri Shram Yogi Maan-Dhan Yojana (PMSYM): This scheme offers a minimum assured pension of ₹3,000 per month to unorganized sector workers, including migrants, upon reaching the age of 60.
      • Ayushman Bharat Pradhan Mantri Jan Arogya Yojana (PM-JAY): This initiative provides health coverage of up to ₹5 lakh for secondary and tertiary healthcare, benefiting millions, including migrant workers.
      • Pradhan Mantri Garib Kalyan Yojana (PMGKY): Extended for five years from January 2024, this scheme ensures food security through free food grains and cash transfers to families below the poverty line, including migrants.
    • Housing Initiatives:
      • Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana (PMAY): This scheme aims to provide affordable housing to low-income groups, including migrants, through various subsidies and housing projects.
      • Affordable Rental Housing Complexes (ARHC): Launched under the Aatma Nirbhar Bharat Abhiyaan, this initiative seeks to provide rental housing for migrant workers and urban poor.
    • One Nation One Ration Card (ONORC): This scheme allows migrant workers to access subsidized food across the country using their existing ration cards, ensuring food security regardless of their location.

    What are the existing challenges related to migrant workers in India? 

    • Economic Insecurity: Migrant workers are often employed in low-wage, unstable jobs, and their dependence on remittances makes them vulnerable to financial hardship during economic downturns.
    • Poor Living and Working Conditions: Migrants often live in overcrowded, inadequate housing with limited access to basic services, and face unsafe, exploitative working conditions, especially in foreign countries.
    • Legal and Social Challenges: Many migrants lack proper legal recognition and identification, hindering access to social security and leaving them vulnerable to exploitation and social discrimination.
    • Urban Overload: Rapid migration strains urban infrastructure, leading to overcrowding, inadequate housing, and pressure on public services in cities, affecting migrants’ living conditions.

    Way forward: 

    • Enhance Local Economic Development: To further reduce the need for long-distance migration, focus on creating more job opportunities, improving infrastructure, and expanding social services in migration-origin regions.
    • Strengthen Migrant Welfare Programs: Ensure better implementation and outreach of existing welfare schemes, such as healthcare, housing, and food security, to protect migrant workers’ rights and well-being across all regions.

    Mains PYQ:

    Q Discuss the changes in the trends of labour migration within and outside India in the last four decades.. (UPSC IAS/2015)

  • India’s SDG focus and its Human Development issues 

    Why in the News?

    On September 9-10, 2023, New Delhi hosted the G-20 Summit, where participants committed to enhancing the implementation of the UN Agenda 2030 for Sustainable Development.

    How effectively is India progressing towards achieving the SDGs by 2030?

    • Current Status: India is classified in the “medium human development” category, with an HDI value of 0.644 and a rank of 134 out of 193 countries.
    • Improvement Over Time: India saw an increase of 48.4% in HDI value from 1990 (0.434) to 2022 (0.644), indicating positive long-term trends despite recent stagnation and slight declines due to factors such as the COVID-19 pandemic.
    • SDG Interconnections: India’s HDI dimensions directly align with several SDGs, including SDG-3 (good health), SDG-4 (quality education), and SDG-5 (gender equality). Progress in these areas is critical for achieving broader SDG targets.
    • Rank Improvements: From 2015 to 2022, India improved its HDI ranking by four places, while neighboring countries such as Bangladesh and Bhutan improved their rankings by 12 and 10 places, respectively, highlighting the need for India to enhance its efforts.

    What are the key human development challenges that India faces?

    • Gender Inequality: India has one of the largest gender gaps in the Labor Force Participation Rate (LFPR), with a stark difference of 47.8 percentage points between women (28.3%) and men (76.1%). The GDI indicates significant disparities in HDI achievements between genders, which undermines development.
    • Income Inequality: India experiences high income inequality, with the richest 1% holding 21.7% of total income, significantly higher than many neighboring countries and above global averages. This poses a barrier to sustainable development and equitable growth.
    • Education and Health: The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic has negatively affected education and health sectors, leading to increased vulnerabilities among poorer and marginalized populations.
    • Urban-Rural Divide: There is a notable disparity in female labour force participation between rural (41.5%) and urban areas (25.4%), suggesting that urban policy initiatives may not adequately support women’s employment.

    What strategies can be implemented? (Way forward)

    • Strengthening Gender Equality: Implement gender-transformative approaches to enhance women’s participation in the labour force and address systemic barriers. This includes policies promoting work-life balance, flexible work arrangements, and targeted skill development programs.
    • Enhancing Education and Skill Development: Invest in quality education, vocational training, and lifelong learning opportunities that cater to both genders, particularly in rural areas.
    • Promoting Social Protection: Expand social safety nets and anticipatory social protection programs that target vulnerable populations, particularly women and marginalized groups.
    • Reducing Income Inequality: Implement progressive taxation and wealth redistribution policies to address the concentration of income.
    • Multi-Stakeholder Engagement: Foster collaboration between government, civil society, and the private sector to implement sustainable development initiatives.

    Mains PYQ:

    Q National Education Policy 2020 isin conformity with the Sustainable Development Goal-4 (2030). It intends to restructure and reorient education system in India. Critically examine the statement. (UPSC IAS/2020)

  • [18th October 2024] The Hindu Op-ed: A modified UBI policy may be more feasible

    PYQ Relevance:

    Q)  “An essential condition to eradicate poverty is to liberate the poor from the process of deprivation.” Substantiate this statement with suitable examples. (UPSC CSE 2016)
    Q) ‘Despite implementation of various programmes for eradication of poverty by the government in India, poverty is still existing’. Explain by giving reasons. (UPSC CSE 2018)
    Q) “The incidence and intensity of poverty are more important in determining poverty based on income alone”. In this context analyse the latest United Nations Multidimensional Poverty Index Report. (UPSC CSE 2020)

    Mentor’s Comment: According to the World Bank, India significantly reduced extreme poverty from 22.5% in 2011 to about 10.2% in 2019. However, ongoing challenges necessitate sustained efforts and targeted interventions to ensure that the benefits of economic growth reach all segments of society.

    Universal Basic Income (UBI) has emerged as a prominent topic in India’s socio-economic discourse, especially after the discussions initiated during the Economic Survey of 2016-17. NITI Aayog’s reports have also emphasize a multi-sectoral approach to poverty alleviation, focusing on improving access to education, healthcare, sanitation, and housing.

    Today’s editorial delves into the complexities surrounding the implementation of UBI in India, highlighting both its potential benefits and the challenges that must be addressed for effective execution.

    _

    Let’s learn!

    Why in the News?

    There are ongoing discussions and debates surrounding the implementation of Universal Basic Income (UBI) in India.

    • The main reasons for this are – existing economic disparities and job losses during the COVID pandemic, secondly the political concerns regarding funding in India, and thirdly, various countries have experimented with UBI, providing valuable insights
    What is ‘Universal Basic Income’?
    • UBI is a financial transfer policy that proposes providing all citizens with a regular, unconditional cash payment to ensure a minimum standard of living.
    • The concept aims to alleviate poverty, reduce inequality, and simplify the welfare system by replacing subsidies with direct cash transfers.
    • However, implementing UBI in a country like India, with its vast population and diverse economic conditions, presents significant hurdles.

    What are the significant hurdles to implementing UBI in India?

    • Fiscal Constraints: Providing a basic income to all citizens would require substantial financial resources, estimated to be around 4.9% of GDP, which could strain the government’s budget and limit funding for other essential services.
      • A sudden influx of cash into the economy could also lead to inflation.
    • Universal vs. Targeted Approach: A universal UBI could lead to inefficiencies, where wealthier individuals also receive benefits, wasting resources intended for the poor. This raises questions about how to effectively target those who need assistance the most.
    • Implementation and Infrastructure Challenges: The lack of infrastructure for banking in remote areas can hinder effective cash transfers and program implementation.
    • Political and Federal Landscape: Building consensus among diverse political parties and interest groups from various states can be challenging in India’s multifaceted political environment.
    • Behavioral and Social Concerns: UBI might reduce the incentive for individuals to seek employment, potentially leading to a decrease in labor force participation and productivity. This dependency could undermine the goal of fostering self-sufficiency among citizens.

    What modifications are necessary to make UBI financially feasible in India?

    • Targeted Implementation: Instead of universal payments to all citizens, prioritize UBI for low-income and vulnerable households to reduce overall costs. For example, a semi-UBI model that provides basic income to specific demographics can be used.
    • Funding Mechanisms: Redirect funds from existing welfare schemes and subsidies that are inefficient or prone to leakage into the UBI program. Implement progressive taxation to increase government revenue, ensuring that higher-income groups contribute more to fund UBI.
    • Incremental Rollout: India needs to start with pilot projects in select regions to assess the impact and effectiveness of UBI before a nationwide rollout. This allows for adjustments based on real-world data.
    • Administrative Efficiency: The Govt needs to leverage current Direct Benefit Transfer (DBT) systems to minimize administrative costs and then enhance digital banking infrastructure and mobile connectivity, especially in rural areas, to facilitate access to UBI payments.
    • Monitoring and Evaluation: Establishing the mechanisms for tracking the distribution and impact of UBI payments to ensure transparency and accountability could help. We also need to incorporate beneficiary feedback into program design and implementation to adapt UBI according to the needs of recipients.
    • Public Awareness and Support: Conduct awareness programs through all stakeholders to educate citizens about UBI’s benefits and address misconceptions.

    What are the potential social and economic impacts of implementing UBI in India?

    1) Economic Impacts:

    • Poverty Alleviation: UBI could lift millions out of poverty by providing a basic income floor, addressing the needs of approximately 3.44 crore people living in extreme poverty in India.
    • Increased Consumer Spending: By putting cash directly into people’s hands, UBI could boost disposable income, leading to increased consumption. This is particularly important as private consumption accounts for nearly 60% of India’s GDP.
    • Economic Growth: Enhanced consumer demand could stimulate economic growth, especially in rural areas, benefiting sectors like agriculture and fast-moving consumer goods.
    • Human Capital Development: With increased financial stability, families may invest more in education and healthcare, improving overall human capital and productivity in the long run

    2) Social Impacts:

    • Empowerment of Women: UBI could enhance financial independence for women, allowing them greater decision-making power within households and potentially leading to better outcomes for families.
    • Reduction in Inequality: UBI has the potential to narrow income inequality by redistributing wealth more equitably across society, addressing the disproportionate wealth held by the top 10.
    • Potential Behavioral Changes: Critics argue that providing income without work may lead to decreased motivation to seek employment, potentially fostering a culture of dependency among some recipients.

    Way Forward: While UBI presents promising avenues for economic growth and social empowerment in India, careful consideration is needed regarding its design and implementation. Addressing potential drawbacks such as inflationary pressures and labor market distortions will ensure that UBI achieves its intended goals.

    https://www.thehindu.com/opinion/lead/a-modified-ubi-policy-may-be-more-feasible/article68765963.ece

  • [16th October 2024] The Hindu Op-ed: Food access is about equitable agrifood systems

    PYQ Relevance:

    Q) Elaborate the policy taken by the Government of India to meet the challenges of the food processing sector. (UPSC CSE 2019)

    Q) What are the reformative steps taken by the Government to make the food grain distribution system more effective? (UPSC CSE 2019)

    Q) What are the challenges and opportunities of the food processing sector in the country? How can the income of the farmers be substantially increased by encouraging food processing? (UPSC CSE 2020)

    Mentor’s Comment: Food security in India faces several critical issues that affect the availability, accessibility, and quality of food for its population. A significant portion of India’s population lives below the poverty line, limiting their access to nutritious food. Despite high agricultural production, unequal distribution means that many people do not receive adequate food, leading to malnutrition and hunger.

    While food availability has improved, there is a growing concern regarding the nutritional quality of food in upcoming years. Many people suffer from “hidden hunger,” lacking essential vitamins and minerals despite sufficient caloric intake. The increasing population pressures food resources, making it challenging to ensure that everyone has access to adequate nutrition.

    Addressing these challenges requires a multi-faceted approach involving policy reforms, improved agricultural practices, and enhanced social safety nets to ensure equitable access to food across all segments of society.

    _

    Let’s learn!

    Why in the News?

    The theme for this year’s World Food Day (16th Oct 2024) is “Right to Foods for a better life and a better future,” emphasizing the importance of equitable access to safe, nutritious, and affordable food.

    • This initiative is supported by the FAO, IFAD, and WFP in collaboration with the Government of India, highlighting the urgent need to address food insecurity affecting 733 million people globally.

    What is Equitable Agrifood Systems?

    Equitable agrifood systems are defined as those that not only ensure food security but also promote social equity among various stakeholders involved in the food supply chain.

    • Food access is a critical aspect of equitable agrifood systems, which aim to address food inequality and ensure that all individuals have sufficient access to nutritious food.

    These systems are characterized by:

    • Sustainability: They contribute to the sustainable management of natural resources while ensuring economic opportunities for all actors within the agri-food sector.
    • Social Equity: They aim to provide equal access to resources, addressing disparities related to gender, ethnicity, and socio-economic status.
    • Nutritional Security: They focus on delivering adequate nutrition to all populations, combating issues like malnutrition and hunger.

    Challenges in achieving Equitable Food Access

    • Current System Limitations: Existing agrifood systems often fail to provide adequate food security and equitable distribution, leading to simultaneous issues of hunger and overconsumption, known as the “triple burden of malnutrition”.
    • Investment Priorities: Most investments in agrifood systems prioritize production over social or environmental objectives, which limits progress toward equity.
    • Research Gaps: There are significant gaps in research focused on social equity outcomes within food systems. This lack of targeted research contributes to the marginalization of critical issues such as health, nutrition, and the needs of vulnerable populations like women and youth.

    What are the different strategies for building Equitable Agrifood Systems?

    • Integrated Approaches: Transforming food systems requires integrated actions across sectors and levels of governance. This includes aligning agricultural practices with climate action initiatives to build resilience against environmental changes.
    • Policy Design: Policymakers must design inclusive policies that consider the impacts on gender and youth inequalities within agrifood systems. Monitoring these impacts is essential for ensuring equitable outcomes.
    • Engagement of Diverse Voices: Effective transformation necessitates the inclusion of diverse stakeholders—scientists, policymakers, farmers, women, youth, and Indigenous peoples—in decision-making processes. Their insights can help shape more responsive and equitable policies.

    What role do sustainability and innovation play in promoting equitable agrifood systems?

    • Digital Technologies: Leveraging digital innovations can enhance access to information and resources for marginalized communities, improving their participation in agrifood systems.
    • Collaborative Research: Engaging multiple stakeholders in research efforts can help identify best practices and innovative solutions tailored to local contexts.

    Conclusion: Achieving the SDG 2- “Zero Hunger” goal requires a multifaceted approach that addresses systemic inequities while promoting sustainability and resilience. By prioritizing social equity in policy design we can create a more just and sustainable future for all individuals within the global food system.

  • How circular migration can help meet global skill shortages and lift Indians out of poverty?

    Why in the News?

    Maharashtra’s 997 youth, earning Rs 1.37 lakh in Israel, engage in circular migration, boosting skills through labour mobility agreements.

    What is the “triple win” scenario associated with circular migration?

    • Migrants win by gaining high-paying jobs, improving their skills, and getting social security benefits while working abroad.
    • The home country (like India) wins because when the workers return, they bring back new skills and experience that help improve local industries.
    • The host country (like Israel or Germany) wins because they get the skilled workers they need to fill labour shortages without facing long-term migration issues.

    How does circular migration contribute to skill development and poverty alleviation for Indian migrants?

    • Skill Development: Indian workers gain exposure to international work environments, cutting-edge technology, and management protocols, which enhance their skills and employability.
    • Poverty Alleviation: Higher wages in developed countries allow migrants to send remittances back home, improving the economic conditions of their families and contributing to poverty alleviation.

    In what way does circular migration mitigate the issue of brain drain?

    • Temporary Nature: Since workers return after a set period (e.g., five years), they bring back their enhanced skills and experience, preventing a permanent loss of talent to foreign nations.
    • Knowledge Transfer: Returning workers contribute to domestic industries by applying the new skills and technologies they learned abroad, benefiting the home economy.

    What are the policy implications for implementing circular migration effectively? (Way forward) 

    • Skill Matching and Training: Governments must ensure exact skill matching between migrant workers and the requirements of the destination countries, providing refresher courses and training as needed.
    • Government-to-Government Agreements: Strong bilateral agreements are essential to safeguard the rights of workers, ensure fair wages, and provide social security in the destination countries.
    • Streamlined Procedures: Policies should simplify legal compliances, fast-track passport issuance, and remove barriers like language skills through training in languages such as Japanese, German, or French.

    Conclusion: Circular migration offers a “triple win” by benefiting migrants, home countries, and host nations. It enhances skills, boosts incomes, mitigates brain drain, and fosters knowledge transfer, provided there is proper policy support, skill matching, and streamlined processes.

    Mains PYQ:

    Q Major cities of India are becoming vulnerable to flood conditions. Discuss. (UPSC IAS/2016)