💥Mains Ready By December. Smash Mains & Smash PYQ Admissions Open
Talk to Mentor

Civilsdaily

Login

GS Paper: GS1-09.Globalisation and its effects on Indian society

  • What guardrails India is putting to safeguard young social media users?

    Why in the News?

    A Los Angeles jury verdict holding Meta and YouTube liable for addictive design harming minors marks a decisive shift from platform immunity to accountability. This challenged the long-standing safe harbour regime. The ruling, awarding ~$6 million damages (Meta ~70%, YouTube ~30%), explicitly identifies infinite scroll and algorithmic recommendation loops as engineered addiction tools, a first in judicial recognition.

    Why has addictive social media design become a global regulatory concern?

    1. Judicial Recognition of Harm: Establishes causal link between platform design and mental health; US case identifies “engineered addiction” via infinite scroll and engagement loops.
    2. Scale of Impact: WHO estimates 1 in 7 adolescents globally suffer mental health conditions; social media identified as a major contributing factor in multiple OECD reports.
    3. Policy Shift Globally: Australia proposes ban for under-16s (2024); EU’s Digital Services Act (DSA) imposes stricter obligations on platforms regarding minors.

    What are the core elements of India’s regulatory approach toward minors?

    1. Hybrid Governance Model: Combines statutory laws + self-regulation + awareness initiatives, unlike strict bans seen globally.
    2. Graded Access Proposal: Government considering age-differentiated access frameworks instead of blanket prohibition.
    3. Institutional Framework: Ministries like MeitY and MWCD involved in policy design, indicating cross-sector governance.

    How does the Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023 address child safety?

    1. Parental Consent Mechanism: Mandates verifiable guardian consent for users under 18, increasing compliance burden on platforms.
    2. Restrictions on Data Use: Prohibits tracking, behavioural monitoring, and targeted advertising for children.
    3. Implementation Gap: Internet Governance Policy Project (2025) flags easy circumvention via false age declaration.

    What legal protections exist against online harms to children in India?

    1. IT Act, 2000: Criminalises child sexual abuse material (CSAM); India among top countries reporting such content (NCRB data trends).
    2. POCSO Act, 2012: Recognises online grooming and exploitation; expanded interpretation in digital contexts.
    3. Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023: Extends criminal liability to digital harassment, trafficking, and exploitation of minors

    What are the key shortcomings in India’s current framework?

    1. Enforcement Deficit: Existing laws lack real-time monitoring and strict penalties, leading to compliance gaps.
    2. Technological Loopholes: Absence of robust age-verification systems allows minors to bypass safeguards.
    3. Design Blind Spot: Regulatory focus remains on content moderation, ignoring addictive platform architecture.

    How does the global verdict reshape platform accountability norms?

    1. Erosion of Safe Harbour: Platforms may face direct liability for design choices, not just hosted content.
    2. Precedent for Litigation: Opens door for mass tort claims globally, involving thousands of affected users.
    3. Shift to Design Regulation: Moves discourse from what content is shown to how  how platforms are designed. 

    Conclusion

    India’s approach remains regulatory but not transformative, as it addresses data and content but not platform design incentives. Future reforms must integrate technology, law, and behavioural insights to ensure effective child protection.

    PYQ Relevance

    [UPSC 2024] Social media and encrypting messaging services pose a serious security challenge. What measures have been adopted at various levels to address the security implications of social media? Also suggest remedies.

    Linkage: This question is important as it reflects the expanding scope of social media from a security issue to a governance and regulatory challenge. The theme extends to ethics (manipulation, corporate responsibility), student behaviour (addiction, mental health), and emerging social challenges, making it highly relevant for GS-4 (Ethics) and Essay (technology & society).

  • Australia social media ban on users aged under-16 kicks in

    Introduction

    Australia has enacted a first-of-its-kind law mandating that major social media platforms verify user age and remove accounts of children below 16 unless parents explicitly consent. The reform marks a sharp departure from earlier tech-driven self-regulation and responds to rising concerns over children’s mental health, grooming risks, harmful content, and the pressure of constant screen exposure. The move has been positioned as a “template for the world,” with global relevance as regulators struggle to manage Big Tech.

    Why in the news?

    Australia has become the first country globally to impose a minimum age for social media access, marking a structural shift in how online safety is governed. The legislation is significant because social media firms were previously allowed to operate on self-declared age checks, often exploited by under-16 users. 

    Australia’s Move Towards an Age-Restricted Internet Ecosystem

    1. Minimum age requirement: Platforms must block users under 16 unless parents consent.
    2. Verification mandate: Tech firms must take “reasonable steps” to verify age and remove under-age accounts.
    3. New regulatory law: The Online Safety Amendment (Social Media Minimum Age) Act creates enforceable obligations.
    4. Scope of platforms: Facebook, Instagram, YouTube, Snapchat, X, TikTok, Threads, Reddit covered.

    What Makes the Age-16 Cut-Off Significant?

    1. Based on mental-health indicators: Government-commissioned survey found 74% of children saw or heard disturbing content; 53% experienced online bullying; 27% faced personal attacks.
    2. Escalating harm to minors: 38% reported exposure to harmful content; 16% received sexualised images; 25% faced coercion or harassment.
    3. Self-harm risk: 17% saw content encouraging suicide or self-harm.
    4. Increased vulnerability: Under-16 users are at greater risk of grooming, hate speech, compulsive scrolling and pressure for online perfection.

    How Are Tech Companies Responding?

    1. Compliance with resistance: Firms say the rule may not improve safety unless implemented globally.
    2. Burden of verification: Companies argue age-verification tools are intrusive or inaccurate.
    3. Big Tech backlash: Meta has called it impractical; industry bodies say “it will not make kids safer.”
    4. Regulator’s stance: eSafety insists firms have long failed to prioritise child safety despite repeated warnings.

    How Does This Compare With India’s Approach?

    1. Parental consent focus: India allows minors to access social media with guardian approval; no age-16 prohibition.
    2. Law under review: India’s DPDP Act originally proposed a strict age-limit but relaxed it in 2023.
    3. Tech-industry influence: India’s softer position partly reflects concerns of over-regulation and digital inclusion.
    4. Existing obligations: Platforms must ensure safety of users but without mandatory age verification.
    5. Contrast in regulatory philosophy: Australia mandates verification; India relies on parental oversight.

    Why Is Australia Positioning Itself as a Global Template?

    1. First mover advantage: No other country has set a universal age-16 social media restriction.
    2. Evidence-backed regulation: Emphasis on child mental-health data, grooming cases, hate content rise.
    3. Model for Western democracies: May influence UK’s Online Safety Act and EU child-protection deliberations.
    4. Accountability push: Shifts burden onto platforms, not users or parents.

    Arguments Supporting the Ban

    1. Protects Mental and Emotional Health
      1. Lower exposure to harmful content and compulsive usage.
      2. Reduces anxiety, body-image issues, and cyberbullying.
    2. Ensures Safer Social Environments
      1. Decreases risks of grooming, harassment, stalking.
      2. Strengthens mechanisms of child protection.
    3. Encourages Healthy Childhood Development
      1. Promotes in-person socialisation, sports, hobbies.
      2. Protects attention spans and reduces digital addiction.
    4. Enhances Parental Participation
      1. Builds shared responsibility between state and family.
      2. Forms a bridge for conversations on digital behaviour.
    5. Holds Big Tech Accountable
      1. Platforms must prioritise safety over profit algorithms.
      2. Shifts burden from minors to corporations.

    Arguments Criticising the Ban 

    1. May Not Be Technically Feasible: 
      1. Age-verification technologies can be inaccurate or intrusive.
      2. Teens may bypass rules using VPNs, fake IDs, or loopholes.
    2. Restricts Freedom and Digital Expression
      1. Limits creativity, art-sharing, community-building.
      2. Curtails a teen’s right to express identity.
    3. Affects Social Inclusion: Digital communities are key social spaces; absence may create social disconnectedness.
    4. May Push Children to Unregulated Spaces
      1. Alternative apps, gaming communities, or private groups may become more dangerous.
      2. Harder for parents to monitor.

          5.Differential Impact Across Socio-economic Groups: Children with tech-savvy families bypass       easily; others comply strictly; this may lead to inequality in digital exposure.

    Conclusion

    Australia’s social media age-restriction law marks a decisive shift toward child-centric digital governance. By mandating age verification, compelling parental consent, and imposing significant penalties, it challenges Big Tech’s long-standing autonomy. Its global implications lie in redefining platform accountability and inspiring nations to re-examine their youth-safety frameworks. For India, the development provides an important reference point as it balances innovation with child protection in digital spaces.

    PYQ Relevance

    [UPSC 2023] Child cuddling is now being replaced by mobile phones. Discuss its impact on the socialization of children.

    This PYQ directly relates to how digital exposure alters children’s socialisation, a core concern behind Australia’s under-16 social media ban. It links the societal impact of early phone use with the need for stronger regulation to protect minors online.

  • Addiction, Not Play

    Introduction

    Online real-money gaming is no longer an innocent form of entertainment. With mechanics borrowed from gambling, variable rewards, high engagement loops, and rapid gratification, these games are engineered to create dependency. For India’s youth, this shift has manifested in addiction, financial losses, academic decline, and severe mental health crises. The government’s ban may seem like a safeguard, but the issue is deeper: India’s children deserve not just a firewall, but also psychological care, awareness, and structured support.

    Online Gaming Addiction as a Pressing Concern

    1. Gambling-like mechanisms: Real-money games mirror casino psychology, using reward loops to sustain engagement.
    2. Rising cases of harm: Children have drained family bank accounts, hidden debts, and even attempted suicide due to gaming stress.
    3. Mental health crisis: Anxiety, depression, and suicidal ideation among adolescents point to an urgent public health issue.

    The Fallout of Gaming Addiction on Families

    1. Toxic home environments: Addiction leads to secrecy, conflict, and breakdown of trust.
    2. Academic decline: Falling grades and inability to concentrate fuel further parental distress.
    3. Financial stress: Unexpected credit card bills or loans worsen family relations.

    The Limits of Gaming Bans

    1. Immediate relief: Bans reduce household conflicts and financial shocks.
    2. Partial bans & age-gating: Allowing adults while protecting minors can delay addiction onset.
    3. Psychological displacement: Without therapy, children may shift to pornography, substance abuse, or compulsive social media use.

    Towards a Comprehensive Strategy Against Gaming Addiction

    1. School-based interventions: Routine mental health screenings and workshops on digital addiction.
    2. Parental guidance: Training parents to spot early warning signs and encourage healthy digital habits.
    3. Child-friendly counselling: Access to therapy services designed for adolescents.
    4. Awareness campaigns: Multi-stakeholder efforts targeting students, caregivers, and teachers.

    Gaming Addiction as a Behavioural Health Challenge

    1. Beyond discipline: Punishment or restriction alone worsens secrecy and aggression.
    2. Long-term healing: A behavioural approach can repair family rifts and promote healthy tech use.
    3. Balanced future: Children should grow up with resilience, not dependency, in digital spaces.

    Way Forward: Towards a Balanced Approach

    1. Public Health Lens: Treat gaming addiction as a behavioural health issue with school screenings, awareness drives, and accessible counselling.
    2. Smart Regulation: Use age-gating, spending caps, and parental consent instead of blanket bans.
    3. Global Lessons:
      • China: Strict weekly limits → relief but drove youth to unregulated platforms.
      • UK/EU: Regulate loot boxes as gambling → targeted, flexible control.
      • South Korea: Late-night gaming ban + rehab centres → balance of restriction and support.
    4. India’s Path: A middle way combining safeguards with education and digital literacy, avoiding both overregulation and laissez-faire neglect.

    Conclusion

    India’s youth deserve more than prohibitionist measures. A firewall can block access, but not heal emotional wounds. True protection lies in combining thoughtful regulation with robust mental health programmes, counselling, and awareness. Only then can families find balance and children grow with a healthier relationship to technology.

    PYQ Relevance

    [UPSC 2023] “Child cuddling is now being replaced by mobile phones. Discuss its impact on the socialization of children.”

    Linkage: Online real-money gaming, like mobile phones, is replacing natural child–parent interaction with addictive digital engagement. This weakens socialization, fuels secrecy and conflict within families, and erodes trust. Both highlight how technology-driven dependence disrupts healthy emotional development in children.

  • Diversifying Our Understanding of Religion and Caste in Contemporary India

    Religion

    Central Idea

    • The recent outcome of the Karnataka elections provides an opportunity to broaden our understanding of religion and caste as categories of identity and belief. It is essential to recognize that these identities go beyond mere labels and hold pan-India significance. Amidst the rapid urbanization of Gurugram, the interplay of technology, finance, infrastructure, and land markets has brought about intriguing effects on traditional aspects of life. Notably, the strengthening of caste and religious identities has occurred alongside the transformation of the local landscape

    Contemporary dynamics of the religion and caste in society

    • Social Media: The emergence and widespread use of social media platforms have significantly influenced the dissemination of information and the expression. Social media platforms have provided individuals with new avenues to express their beliefs, connect with like-minded individuals, and engage in discussions and debates related to religion and caste.
    • Leisure Cultures: Changing patterns of leisure activities and cultural practices have contributed to the reshaping of religious and caste identities. The ways in which people engage with leisure, entertainment, and cultural events often intersect with their religious and caste affiliations. These leisure cultures can reinforce existing identities, foster a sense of community, and contribute to the preservation and celebration of religious and caste traditions.
    • Globalization of Identities: The increased mobility, migration, and transnational interactions have allowed for the transmission and adoption of religious and caste practices, beliefs, and ideologies across different geographical locations. This globalization of identities has influenced how individuals perceive and express their religious and caste affiliations.
    • Emphasis on Heritage: The promotion and celebration of cultural heritage, rituals, and customs have become significant aspects of identity formation and community building. This focus on heritage can reinforce religious and caste affiliations and contribute to the preservation of traditional practices.

    Complexities of contemporary identities

    • Intersectionality: Contemporary identities are often multifaceted and intersectional, encompassing multiple dimensions such as gender, class, religion, caste, and regional affiliations. Individuals’ identities are shaped by the interaction of these diverse factors, leading to complex experiences and perspectives.
    • For example: In the context of Gurugram, caste identities intersect with the effects of urbanization, globalization, and economic transformations, creating intricate social dynamics.
    • Shifting Meanings: The meanings attached to religious and caste identities have evolved over time. Globalization, technology, and changing social norms have influenced the ways in which individuals understand and express their religious and caste affiliations. These shifting meanings challenge traditional understandings and necessitate a deeper exploration of the contemporary dynamics surrounding religion and caste.
    • Hybridity and Adaptation: As individuals navigate the complexities of a rapidly changing world, they might combine elements of their religious and caste backgrounds with new cultural practices, beliefs, and expressions. This hybridity reflects the fluid nature of contemporary identities and the ways in which individuals negotiate their sense of self within evolving social contexts.
    • Global Influences: Increased exposure to diverse cultural and religious influences from around the world can impact individuals’ beliefs, practices, and self-perception. This global exchange of ideas and cultural practices contributes to the complexities of contemporary identities, blurring traditional boundaries and fostering new forms of identity expression.
    • Individual Agency: Contemporary identities are influenced by individual agency, as individuals actively construct and negotiate their own sense of self and belonging. People have the autonomy to choose, reinterpret, or reject religious and caste identities based on their personal experiences, beliefs, and aspirations. This individual agency adds complexity to the understanding of contemporary identities and challenges rigid categorizations.

    Why religious and caste sentiments thrive despite the seemingly impersonal nature of modern relations?

    • Historical Significance: Religion and caste have deep historical roots in India, shaping the social, cultural, and political fabric of the country for centuries. These identities have been intricately woven into people’s lives and community structures, and their significance continues to endure even in the face of modernization. Historical legacies and the sense of identity associated with religion and caste contribute to the persistence of these sentiments.
    • Social Cohesion and Belonging: Religion and caste provide individuals with a sense of belonging and community. They offer a framework for social cohesion, providing a sense of identity, support, and solidarity. In an increasingly fragmented and individualistic society, religious and caste affiliations can offer a sense of belongingness and a support system that individuals seek for social integration and a sense of purpose.
    • Cultural Identity and Tradition: Religion and caste are deeply intertwined with cultural practices, rituals, and traditions which provide individuals with a connection to their cultural heritage and a sense of continuity with their ancestors.
    • Social Networks and Support: Religious and caste communities network foster a sense of mutual aid and communal bonds, creating a support system that individuals rely on in times of need. This social support and network-based assistance further reinforce the importance of religious and caste identities.
    • Political and Power Dynamics: Religion and caste continue to play a significant role in political mobilization, electoral strategies, and the distribution of resources and benefits. Political parties often exploit religious and caste identities for electoral gains, further reinforcing their salience and significance in public discourse.

    Why the newly emerging religious identities sometimes manifest as hostility towards those of different faiths?

    • Identity Assertion: The formation of new religious identities can be driven by a desire to assert and strengthen one’s own religious beliefs and practices. In some cases, this assertion may result in a sense of exclusivity and superiority, leading to hostility towards those who hold different beliefs. Individuals may perceive their newly emerging religious identity as being under threat from other faiths, and this defensive response can contribute to animosity and hostility.
    • Socialization and Group Dynamics: If individuals are surrounded by like-minded individuals who reinforce a particular narrative of their religious identity, it can lead to the development of a group mentality that views other faiths with suspicion or hostility. Group dynamics, such as peer pressure, conformity, and the need for social acceptance, can further amplify negative attitudes towards different faiths.
    • Perceived Threats and Insecurity: When new religious identities emerge, followers may perceive threats to their beliefs, traditions, or cultural practices from other faiths or societal changes. This perceived threat can evoke a defensive response, fueling hostility towards those seen as posing a challenge to their newly formed religious identity.
    • Political Instrumentalization: Political actors may exploit religious sentiments and manipulate the narrative to gain support or advance their agenda. This instrumentalization can create an us versus them mentality, deepening divisions and fostering animosity towards religious groups perceived as adversaries.
    • Economic Competition and Social Hierarchies: Economic disparities and perceived inequalities can fuel resentment towards religious groups seen as benefiting disproportionately or hindering one’s own economic advancement. This can result in the projection of animosity onto religious differences.
    • Lack of Interfaith Dialogue and Understanding: Insufficient opportunities for interfaith dialogue and understanding can contribute to the persistence of hostility between religious communities. Limited interactions and communication between followers of different faiths may perpetuate stereotypes, misunderstandings, and a lack of empathy. Without platforms for open dialogue and mutual respect, tensions can escalate, leading to hostility.

    Way forward: Adopting a forward-looking approach

    • Contextual Understanding: Instead of relying solely on historical perspectives, it is crucial to engage with the complexities of the present. This involves analyzing the influence of social media, new leisure cultures, globalization of caste and religious identities, the politics of heritage, and the rise of consumer culture.
    • Critical Questions: To address the contemporary manifestations of religious and caste identities, we need to ask fundamental questions. For instance, we must explore why religious and caste feelings gather strength despite the apparent prevalence of impersonal relations in a world organized through contracts and other similar mechanisms.
    • Contemporary Relevance: The explanations regarding religious identity and caste should be grounded in the present rather than relying solely on the perspectives of historical figures like Gandhi and Ambedkar. While acknowledging their important contributions, we need to apply their vantage points to analyze and understand the contemporary realities.
    • Interdisciplinary Approach: Addressing the complexities of caste and religious identities requires an interdisciplinary approach that combines insights from sociology, anthropology, history, political science, and cultural studies, among other disciplines. By bringing together diverse perspectives, we can gain a more comprehensive understanding of the multifaceted nature of these identities and their implications for contemporary society.
    • Dialogue and Empathy: Encouraging interfaith dialogue, promoting understanding, and fostering empathy are crucial steps towards mitigating hostility and building bridges between different religious communities. Creating platforms for open and respectful discussions can help dispel stereotypes, bridge gaps in understanding, and promote mutual respect.
    • Evolving Definitions: Given the altered meanings of caste and religion in a rapidly changing society, it is important to continuously reassess and redefine these concepts. By recognizing the shifting dynamics and meanings associated with caste and religion, we can develop more nuanced perspectives that align with the contemporary reality.

    Conclusion

    • As we witness the diversification of religion and caste in contemporary India, it is imperative to embrace a nuanced understanding that moves beyond historical interpretations. Recognizing the multifaceted factors influencing modern identities and the complexities of the present allows for a more comprehensive analysis. By exploring the contemporary dynamics and asking pertinent questions, we can better comprehend the changing meanings of religion and caste in today’s society and address the challenges and opportunities they present.

    Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your personal mentor for UPSC 2024 | Schedule your FREE session and get the Prelims prep Toolkit!

    Also read:

    The Caste Census and Mandal Politics: Analysis

  • Consumerism should be replaced by minimalism

    Consumerism Context

    • The COVID-19 pandemic brought shifts in consumer behaviour. The world witnessed a shrinkage of demand. But post-pandemic recovery and suppressed consumerism is now leading to ‘revenge shopping’.

    What is consumerism?

    • Consumerism is a social and economic order that encourages the acquisition of goods and services in ever-increasing amounts.

    What is minimalism?

    • Minimalism is owning fewer possessions. It is intentionally living with only the things we really need those items that support our purpose. Removing the distraction of excess possessions to focus more on those things that matter most.

    ConsumerismWhat Is Revenge Shopping?

    • Revenge shopping occurs when a customer who previously could not get access to certain goods or services for a period of time suddenly has access. It can also occur when customers have been deprived of other events or happenings.

    ConsumerismThe symptoms of excessive consumerism

    • You buy more than you planned: if you set out with a plan of what you need to purchase but consistently come back with more than you anticipated, then you’re falling in the consumerist trap.
    • You run out of storage space for your stuff: sometimes it can’t be helped if you live in a tight area or you’re disorganised. But suppose you’re in a reasonable situation and things you bring in don’t have an allocated home. In that case, you’re likely living excessively.
    • You rely too much on return policies: returning an item is useful. Particularly if you need to test a product for the intended purpose, be it sizing for clothes or a tool for a building project. However, suppose you’re depending on returns for purchases. In that instance, you’re not sure you need it, or if you can’t afford it, then you’re probably suffering from too much consumerism.
    • You routinely seek approval for your purchases: getting feedback on purchases can be reassuring, especially if you’re indecisive. Yet, there’s a difference between picking someone’s brain before buying and looking to justify your purchase after the fact. If you’re seeking post-acquisition approval, you probably don’t need the item.
    • You mistakenly buy things you already have: not much to say here. If you’re getting things only to realise you already have it, then you’re probably deep in a consumerist cycle.
    • You buy things on credit: if you’re strategic and disciplined, you can buy things on credit cards to acquire points and benefits. However, if you’re like the majority of us, then you’re vulnerable to buying things you can’t afford.
    • You constantly go over your budget: sometimes, you miss-forecast how much you need to spend each month. But if you set a realistic budget and find that you’re still going over, then you’re probably consuming excessively.
    • You regret your purchases: the most obvious sign that you have a shopping habit is you regret things you bought. Buyer’s remorse is an overwhelming feeling and one we want to avoid.

    ConsumerismNegatives of consumerism

    • Causes more pollution: Consumerism as a system can have devastating effects on the environment.
    • A major contributor to resource depletion: The second main negative of consumerism is resource depletion.  Simply put, resource depletion refers to the idea that human beings are using up the resources on the earth as an ever increasing rate such that we will ‘deplete’ or completely use up some resources.
    • Leads companies to develop low quality products: Modern companies practice a technique called ‘planned obsolescence’. In general, planned obsolescence is best understood as products that are designed to fail. Modern companies do this to encourage consumers to repurchase a product over and over again.
    • Does not necessarily lead to increased happiness beyond a certain point: The main negative aspect of consumerism is that it does not necessarily lead to higher levels of happiness for people.
    • Global inequality: The huge rise in resource consumption in wealthier countries has led to an ever widening gap between the rich and the poor. As the age old saying goes, “the rich get richer and the poor get poorer.”

    What can we do?

    • Extend the lifespan of your things: Repairing your things is not only an effective way to reduce your consumption, but it’s also beneficial to the environment.
    • Reframe shopping as a skill: When you focus on the role the thing you’re buying will play in the overall experience instead of the experience of shopping itself, you’ll be able to shift away from a consumerist mind-set.
    • Do the deathbed test: Not to get too dark, but if you were hypothetically on your deathbed today, and you were reflecting on your life, what would be your fondest memories? The quality of our lives is generally measured by moments of “that was a good time”, not “that thing I had was awesome”.
    • Borrow or rent instead of buy: A simple method for getting your consumerism under control is to rent or borrow items instead of buying them.
    • Practice minimalism: What’s the ultimate alternative to consumerism? Minimalism. A minimalist is someone who naturally rejects consumerism and sees value in having fewer things over more things. Minimalism is a powerful philosophy that impacts how you view material things, your relationships, commitments, and digital inventory.

    Conclusion:

    • The M.K. Gandhi once said: “The Earth provides-enough to satisfy everyone’s needs but not any one’s greed.” We shall find that Gandhian call to curtailment of wants is relevant in the rapidly depleting natural resources, bio-diversity and eco-system and its contemporary relevance

    Mains question

    Q. What do you understand by the term consumerism? Discuss importance of minimalism as there is rise in revenge shopping in post covid19 era.

    UPSC 2023 countdown has begun! Get your personal guidance plan now! (Click here)