💥Join UPSC 2027,2028 Mentorship (July Batch) + XFactor Notes & Microthemes PDF
Talk to Mentor

Civilsdaily

Login

GS Paper: GS2

  • [21st January 2025] The Hindu Op-ed: Prioritising IMEC is in America’s best interest

    PYQ Relevance:

    Q) The China Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) is viewed as a cardinal subset of China’s larger ‘One Belt One Road’ initiative. Give a brief description of CPEC and enumerate the reasons why India has distanced itself from the same. (UPSC CSE 2018)

    Mentor’s Comment: UPSC mains have always focused on China Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) (2018), and Central Asia, European Region – as a zone of interest for India (2018 & 2022).

    Did you know that a 5% improvement in multimodal transport performance can lead to an increase in exports by nearly $500 billion annually across participating economies. India-Middle East-Europe Economic Corridor (IMEC), a multi-modal trade network focuses on not only physical infrastructure but also digital connectivity and energy security. 

    Today’s editorial emphasizes the strategic importance of the IMEC for the United States. This content can be used to address multifaceted approaches to enhance economic growth in Asian and European regions while promoting democratic values.

    _

    Let’s learn!

    Why in the News?

    The recent signing of a MoU on cybercrime investigations underscores this commitment, as both India and USA aim to bolster their security cooperation in response to common threats like terrorism and organized crime.

    • The IMEC agreement is viewed as a strategic opportunity for Prez. Donald Trump to deepen U.S.-India ties while also promoting multilateral collaboration among participating countries.
    • As Trump 2.0 begins, the present administration is anticipated to continue building on the defense and economic frameworks established during his first term.
    Key highlights of the Recent MoU:

    • Cyber Threat Intelligence Sharing: The agreement facilitates enhanced exchange of information regarding emerging cyber threats, allowing both nations to stay ahead of potential cybercriminal activities.It focuses on improving tools and processes for investigating cybercrimes, thereby strengthening the capabilities of law enforcement agencies in both countries.
    • Capacity Building: The MoU includes provisions for training programs aimed at enhancing investigative skills related to cybercriminal activities, ensuring that personnel are well-equipped to tackle these challenges. The Indian Cyber Crime Coordination Centre (I4C) under the Ministry of Home Affairs will be responsible for executing the MoU from India’s side, while the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS), along with its sub-agencies like Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and the Homeland Security Investigations Cyber Crimes Center (C3), will lead implementation efforts from the U.S. side.
    • Addressing Common Security Challenges: The MoU recognizes the intricate linkages between cybercrime and broader security issues such as terrorism, violent extremism, drug trafficking, organized crime, human trafficking, illegal migration, and money laundering.
    • Strengthening Security Cooperation: This agreement is part of a broader effort to enhance India-U.S. security cooperation as part of their comprehensive strategic partnership, emphasizing the importance of international collaboration in addressing cyber threats.

    What is the strategic significance of IMEC with respect to India and USA’s common interests?

    • Economic Integration: The IMEC (network of ports, railways, and roads) aims to create a seamless flow of goods and services among the participating countries, which include India, the UAE, Saudi Arabia, Israel, and several European nations.
      • For instance, the corridor could significantly reduce transit times for shipping goods to Europe by up to 40% compared to traditional routes like the Suez Canal. Such improvements lead to increased trade volumes and economic growth. 
      • The potential for establishing Free Trade zones along the corridor further enhances this economic integration by reducing tariffs and regulatory barriers.
    • Geopolitical Influence: Supporting IMEC allows the U.S. to counterbalance China’s growing influence in the Middle East through its Belt and Road Initiative (BRI).
      • By investing in IMEC, the U.S. can strengthen its alliances with key partners in Asia and Europe while promoting democratic values and stability. The alignment of interests among the U.S., India, and European nations within this corridor serves as a counterweight to China.
      • For example, the collaboration between India and Gulf monarchies under the IMEC framework is seen as a strategic move to build economic interdependence that can mitigate geopolitical tensions. 
    • Holistic and Sustainable Connectivity: The initiative aims to establish secure High-speed data pipelines that would facilitate the export of India’s IT services to Europe and West Asia, which is crucial for modern economies that rely heavily on digital services.
      • Moreover, there are plans for Renewable Energy Grids that will enable countries along the corridor to share clean energy resources efficiently. 
      • For example, hydrogen pipelines are proposed to transport green hydrogen produced in the Gulf states to Europe, aligning with global energy transition goals. 

    What are the limitations in enhancing strategic ties over IMEC?

    • Logistical and Connectivity Issues: Implementing IMEC requires extensive coordination among multiple countries, involving various modes of transportation.
      • For Example, If one country has outdated ports or railways, it can slow down the movement of goods, making trade less efficient. For instance, delays at a port in India could hold up shipments to Europe.
    • Regulatory Harmonization: The diverse regulatory frameworks and systems and regulations of the participating nations pose significant challenges.
      • For Example, if India has strict import regulations while a Middle Eastern country has more relaxed rules, it could lead to conflicts about how goods are traded. 
      • Finding common ground on regulations is essential for smooth operations.
    • Security Concerns: The region traversed by IMEC is susceptible to security threats, including terrorism and political instability.
      • For Example, ongoing conflicts, such as those in Syria and Yemen, along with historical rivalries (e.g., Saudi-Iranian tensions), complicate efforts to ensure a secure environment necessary for attracting investments and fostering economic growth.
    • China Factor: If China offers better financing or faster infrastructure development for its routes, countries (esp European)  might prefer to partner with China rather than engage with IMEC.
      • As of 2023, BRI engagement has surpassed USD 1 trillion, with approximately USD 419 billion allocated to non-financial investments and USD 634 billion to construction contracts (which is much higher than IMEC).
    • Financial Commitments: The ambitious nature of IMEC demands substantial financial investments from participating nations.
      • But, if a country like Iraq struggles with its economy, it may not be able to contribute financially to the project, which could slow down progress for everyone involved.

    Way Forward: The IMEC represents a strategic opportunity for the USA to enhance its geopolitical influence while promoting economic growth and stability among participating nations. 

    • As the U.S. navigates complex international dynamics, prioritizing IMEC will be crucial in establishing a resilient and interconnected economic framework that benefits all stakeholders involved, ultimately contributing to a more stable and prosperous global order.

    https://www.thehindu.com/opinion/op-ed/prioritising-imec-is-in-americas-best-interest/article69120478.ece

  • UGC’s draft regulation has serious constitutional issues

    Why in the News?

    Non-BJP-led State governments oppose the UGC’s draft regulation on vice chancellors’ appointments, claiming it violates constitutional federal principles, and have called for its immediate withdrawal.

    What are the aims and objectives behind the University Grants Commission Act, 1956?

    The University Grants Commission (UGC) Act, 1956 was established to regulate and improve higher education in India. Its key aims and objectives are:

    • Coordination and Standardization: Ensuring the coordination and determination of standards in universities to maintain quality education.
    • Promotion of University Education: Taking steps to promote, develop, and coordinate university education across the country.
    • Allocation of Funds: Allocating financial resources for the maintenance and development of universities.
    • Advisory Role: Advising Union and State governments on grant allocation for general or specific purposes in higher education.
    • Information Collection: Gathering and disseminating information on university education within India and abroad for institutional improvement.
    • Regulation of Fees: Regulating fees to ensure accessibility and fairness in higher education.

    What are the crucial point that needs to be considered?

    • Jurisdiction of UGC: The UGC’s authority to regulate the selection and appointment of vice-chancellors is questionable since the UGC Act does not explicitly include these provisions. The primary focus of the Act is on maintaining educational standards, not on administrative appointments.
    • Consistency with UGC Act: Any regulation made by the UGC must align with the provisions of the UGC Act. If a regulation extends beyond the scope of the Act, it could be deemed ultra vires (beyond legal authority) and thus invalid.
    • Federal Principles: The proposed regulations have raised concerns about violating federal principles enshrined in the Constitution of India, as they may interfere with state legislations that govern universities.
    • Legislative Authority: Qualifications and selection criteria for vice chancellors are typically established by state legislatures, highlighting a potential overreach by the UGC in its regulatory role.
    • Impact on Educational Standards: The selection and appointment of vice-chancellors should not be viewed as directly impacting educational standards, which is the primary mandate of the UGC.
    • Judicial Precedents: Previous court rulings, including those from the Bombay High Court and the Supreme Court, have established important legal precedents regarding the relationship between UGC regulations and state laws, emphasizing that subordinate legislation cannot override state legislation.
    • Constitutional Questions: There are ongoing constitutional debates regarding whether UGC regulations can override state laws and how such conflicts should be resolved under Article 254 of the Constitution, which addresses repugnancy between central and state laws.

    What is the present ruling made by the judiciary?

    The judiciary has provided significant rulings concerning the University Grants Commission (UGC) regulations, particularly regarding the selection and appointment of vice-chancellors.  

    • Kalyani Mathivanan Case (2015): The Supreme Court ruled that UGC regulations have a binding effect on universities. This ruling emphasized that subordinate legislation, such as UGC regulations, must be adhered to by the universities under its jurisdiction.
    • Bombay High Court Ruling (2011): In the case of Suresh Patilkhede vs. The Chancellor Universities of Maharashtra, the court stated that UGC regulations cannot override state legislation. It highlighted that Regulation 7.3.0, being subordinate legislation, does not have the authority to supersede laws enacted by state legislatures.
    • Constitutional Context: The rulings also touched upon Article 254 of the Constitution, which deals with repugnancy between central and state laws. It clarified that only a law passed by both Houses of Parliament and assented to by the President can override state legislation, not subordinate regulations like those issued by the UGC.
    Note: Regulation 7.3.0 pertains to the selection and appointment of Vice Chancellors in universities. Its provisions aim to establish minimum qualifications and a transparent process for such appointments, particularly to ensure the maintenance of academic and administrative standards in higher education institutions.

    Way forward: 

    • Collaborative Federal Framework: Establish a consensus-driven approach between the UGC and State governments to ensure that regulations respect federal principles while upholding academic standards. This can involve creating joint committees for resolving conflicts and aligning policies.
    • Judicial Clarity and Legislative Reforms: Seek a definitive constitutional interpretation of the UGC’s regulatory scope through the judiciary, and, if needed, amend the UGC Act to explicitly define its role in administrative matters, ensuring consistency with the federal structure.

  • [pib] Internet Governance Internship and Capacity Building (IGICB) Scheme

    Why in the News?

    The National Internet Exchange of India (NIXI) has introduced the Internet Governance Internship and Capacity Building Scheme, aiming to enhance awareness and develop expertise in Internet Governance (IG) among Indian citizens.

    About Internet Governance Internship and Capacity Building (IGICB) Scheme: 

    Details
    About the Scheme
    • Launched by National Internet Exchange of India (NIXI) under MeitY.
    • Aims to build expertise in Internet Governance (IG) and enable global participation.

    Aims and Objectives:

    • Develop Expertise: Build Indian talent in Internet Governance.
    • Enhance Global Participation: Collaborate with organisations like ICANN, ISOC, and IETF.
    • Promote Digital Inclusivity: Ensure India’s representation in global forums.
    • Foster Leadership: Shape future tech policy leaders.
    Structural Mandate
    • Tracks: Six-month and three-month internship programs.
    • Mentorship: Guided by experts from ICANN, APNIC, and academic advisors.
    • Support Mechanism: Stipend of ₹20,000/month and support for outreach programs.
    • Online Portal: Applications via NIXI Scheme Portal, with biometric verification.
    Features of the Scheme
    • Global Exposure: Collaboration with leading organisations like ICANN, ISOC, and IEEE.
    • Capacity Building: Focus on cybersecurity, Internet Governance, and digital policy.
    • Mentorship: Hands-on guidance by seasoned professionals.
    • Youth Engagement: Attracts young talent passionate about Internet Governance.
    • Policy Impact: Strengthens India’s voice in global Internet Governance forums.

     

    What is National Internet Exchange of India (NIXI)?

    • Establishment: Founded on June 19, 2003, under the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (MeitY).
    • Purpose: A not-for-profit organisation facilitating increased internet penetration and adoption across India.
    • Key Services:
    1. Internet Exchange Points (IXPs): Builds infrastructure for internet exchange points.
    2. .IN Registry: Promotes .in domain digital identity.
    3. IRINN: Facilitates adoption of IPv4 and IPv6 addresses.

  • [20th January 2025] The Hindu Op-ed: A surge in radical governments, the hope of democracy

    PYQ Relevance:

    Q) Religious indoctrination via social media has resulted in Indian youth joining ISIS. What is ISIS and its mission? How can ISIS be dangerous to the internal security of our country?  (UPSC CSE 2015)

    Mentor’s Comment: UPSC mains have always focused on Religious indoctrination (2015), and ‘tolerance, assimilation and pluralism ’ (2022).

    When the Taliban seized power on August 15, 2021, despite an Islamic State attack killing 13 U.S. troops and $7.1 billion in U.S. weaponry left behind, global powers like the U.S., China, and Russia engaged with the Taliban. The West rationalized this as a move to curb terrorism and support women’s and minorities’ rights, prioritizing pragmatism over democracy.

    Today’s editorial talks about radicalism around the world and its impact on democratic values. This content will be helpful in substantiation the answer in GS Mains paper 2 the impact of radicalism around the world.

    _

    Let’s learn!

    Why in the News?

    The recent surge in radical governments worldwide is a notable trend, reflecting a broader discontent with traditional political systems and a shift towards populism and far-right ideologies.

    What factors are contributing to the rise of radical and populist governments globally?

    • Political Vacuum and Instability: The collapse of established governments, as seen in Afghanistan and Syria, creates a power vacuum that radical groups exploit. The Taliban’s takeover in Afghanistan and the recent rise of Hayat Tahrir Al-Sham (HTS) in Syria illustrate how instability can lead to the emergence of radical leadership.
    • International Legitimization: Once radical groups seize power, there is often a tendency among global powers to engage with them, legitimizing their authority despite their past actions. The U.S., China, and Russia’s willingness to work with the Taliban post-2021 exemplifies this trend, as they justified engagement as a means to promote stability and human rights.
    • Economic Factors: Economic hardship and lack of opportunities can fuel support for radical ideologies. In regions where traditional governance structures fail to provide for citizens, extremist groups may present themselves as viable alternatives.
    • Religious and Ethnic Polarization: The rise of religious hate and ethnic divisions contributes to the appeal of radical movements. In Bangladesh, for instance, the resurgence of Islamic radicalism is linked to a backdrop of rising religiophobia against non-Abrahamic religions.

    How did the radical governments impact democratic institutions in Syria and Bangladesh?

    • Erosion of Democratic Norms: In both Syria and Bangladesh, the rise of radical groups has led to the dismantling of democratic institutions. The HTS’s control over Syria has resulted in authoritarian governance reminiscent of previous regimes, while the military-led government in Bangladesh threatens to undermine democratic processes established since 2008.
    • Suppression of Civil Liberties: Radical governments often impose restrictions on freedoms, particularly targeting women and minority rights. The Taliban’s denial of girls’ education and restrictions on women’s rights post-takeover reflect this pattern, while similar threats loom in Bangladesh under military rule.
    • Manipulation of Political Discourse: Radical groups often use anti-establishment rhetoric to galvanize support, leading to increased polarization within society. In Bangladesh, extremist factions are attempting to regain influence by attacking minority communities and framing their actions in opposition to India, which complicates national unity.

    Way forward: 

    • Strengthening Democratic Institutions: For countries like Bangladesh, reinforcing democratic norms and institutions is crucial. International support should focus on promoting inclusive governance that respects minority rights and prevents the resurgence of extremist ideologies1.
    • Engagement with Civil Society: Encouraging dialogue with civil society organizations can help build resilience against radicalization. Empowering grassroots movements that advocate for democracy and human rights can counteract extremist narratives.
    • International Cooperation: A coordinated international approach is necessary to address the root causes of radicalization. This includes economic support for development, promoting education, and fostering political stability without legitimizing extremist groups through engagement that overlooks their past actions.

    https://www.thehindu.com/opinion/lead/incidents-on-loop-but-its-escape-for-regulator-airlines/article69040616.ece

  • What did the ILO report state about International migrants?

    Why in the News?

    According to the International Labour Organisation’s (ILO) Global Estimates on International Migrant Workers, released in Geneva, the global population of international migrants reached 284.5 million in 2022, with 255.7 million of them being of working age (15 and older).

    Why are there more male International Migrants in the global labour force than women? 

    • Gender Roles and Norms: Traditional gender roles and societal norms often restrict women’s ability to migrate autonomously. Women are frequently expected to prioritize family responsibilities, which limits their opportunities for international migration and labor market participation.
    • Labour Market Segmentation: Women are often concentrated in specific sectors such as domestic work, caregiving, and low-skilled service jobs, which are undervalued and less visible.
      • Men, on the other hand, dominate higher-paying sectors like construction and agriculture, which are more open to international migrants.
    • Barriers to Employment: As per ILO, Migrant women face higher unemployment rates (8.7%) compared to migrant men (6.2%), due to factors such as language barriers, unrecognised qualifications, limited childcare options, and gender-based discrimination in host countries.
    • Economic and Social Independence: Women’s migration decisions are influenced by their access to resources and social networks. A lack of autonomy or financial independence can hinder their ability to migrate for work.
      • In some cases, women migrate as dependents or spouses of male workers, which limits their access to legal employment opportunities in the host country.

    Which economic sectors attract IMs?

    • Construction: The construction industry employs a significant number of male migrants, particularly in regions with rapid urbanisation and infrastructure projects. This sector, part of the 35.6% of male migrant employment in industry, plays a vital role in economic expansion.
    • Agriculture: Globally, 7.1% of international migrants work in agriculture, with higher figures in regions like Africa, where 27.5% are employed in agriculture, forestry, and fishing. Migrants are crucial for meeting seasonal labour demands.
    • Manufacturing: Manufacturing heavily relies on migrant workers in industrialized nations, with migrants filling manual labour and skill-specific roles. This sector highlights the alignment of migrant labour with economic development needs.
    • Services Sector: Approximately 68.4% of international migrants are employed in the services sector, compared to 51.5% of non-migrants. This sector includes a wide range of occupations, but it is particularly noted for:
      • Care Work: A significant number of migrant women are employed in caregiving roles, which include healthcare and domestic services. About 28.8% of migrant women work in the care economy.
      • Hospitality and Retail: Many migrants find employment in hotels, restaurants, and retail stores, especially in high-demand tourist areas.

    Which are the main host countries?

    Approximately 68.4% of international migrants are concentrated in high-income countries followed by 17.4% (29.2 million) in upper-middle-income countries.

    • Regional Distribution of Migrant Workers (2022): International migrants in the labour force were primarily concentrated in Europe and Central Asia (34.5%, 57.8 million), followed by the Americas (27.3%, 45.8 million), Asia and the Pacific (16.2%, 27.2 million), the Arab States (13.5%, 22.6 million), and Africa (8.5%, 14.3 million). The majority resided in Northern, Southern, and Western Europe (23.3%), Northern America (22.6%), and the Arab States (13.5%), collectively hosting 59.4% of all migrant workers.
    • Significant Proportions in Labor Forces: Migrants formed more than one-third (37.2%) of the Arab States’ labour force. Significant proportions were also observed in Europe and Central Asia (12.9%) and the Americas (9%), highlighting their vital role in these economies.

    Conclusion: Governments and international organizations should implement gender-responsive migration policies that address barriers faced by women. This includes creating support systems for childcare, recognizing foreign qualifications, and ensuring equal access to legal employment opportunities in host countries.

    Mains PYQ:

    Q “Success of make in India program depends on the success of Skill India programme and radical labour reforms.” Discuss with logical arguments. (UPSC IAS/2015)

  • Lokpal and Lokayukta

    Why in the News?

    12 years after its enactment, the Lokpal and Lokayukta Act, 2013, has seen limited impact, with the Lokpal ordering just 24 investigations and granting 6 prosecution sanctions.

    History of Lokpal:

    • The First Administrative Reforms Commission (ARC-I) recommended establishing an anti-corruption ombudsman for India in 1966.
    • Several Lokpal Bills were introduced between 1971 and 2008, but none were passed.
    • In 2011, activist Anna Hazare’s Jan Lokpal Andolan led to significant public pressure for an anti-corruption framework.
    • This movement resulted in the enactment of the Lokpal and Lokayuktas Act, 2013, which provides for the appointment of:
      • Lokpal at the Centre.
      • Lokayuktas in states to address corruption cases involving public servants.

    About Lokpal and Lokayukta

    Lokpal Lokayukta
    About
    • Envisioned under the Lokpal and Lokayuktas Act, 2013, it is India’s first anti-corruption ombudsman at the central level.
    • Covers corruption cases involving public servants, including the Prime Minister (with exceptions), Union Ministers, MPs, and central government officials.
    • Appointed by the President on the recommendation of a Selection Committee (includes PM, LoP, CJI, and an eminent jurist).
    • Established under Section 63 of the Lokpal and Lokayuktas Act, 2013, as the state-level counterpart to the Lokpal.
    • Handles corruption cases involving state public servants, including Chief Ministers, Ministers, MLAs, and state officials.
    • Appointed by the Governor, with the composition and appointment process varying across states.
    Powers and Functions
    • Investigates corruption cases under the Prevention of Corruption Act.
    • Can confiscate property acquired through corrupt practices.
    • Has jurisdiction over central officials in Groups A, B, C, and D, and institutions receiving significant foreign contributions or government funding.
    • Can refer cases to the CBI or its Inquiry Wing for investigation.
    • Submits annual reports to the President, which are tabled in Parliament.
    • Investigates cases under state laws, particularly involving state public servants.
    • Addresses corruption complaints related to government schemes, contracts, and functioning.
    • Powers vary across states, but typically include authority to recommend investigations, disciplinary action, or prosecution.
    • Submits annual reports to the Governor, which are presented in the State Legislature.
    Structural Mandate
    • Composition: Chairperson (former CJI, SC Judge, or eminent person) and up to 8 members, 50% of whom must be from SC/ST/OBC/Minorities/Women.
    • Tenure: 5 years or until 70 years of age.
    • Salary: Chairperson’s salary equals CJI, members’ salaries equal SC Judges.
    • Removal by the President upon SC inquiry for misconduct or incapacity.
    • Composition: Varies by state law but generally includes a Chairperson and members with qualifications similar to the Lokpal.
    • Tenure: Defined by state legislation.
    • Salary: Modeled on the Lokpal but subject to state laws.
    • Removal by the Governor, often following a process modelled on the Lokpal Act.

     

    PYQ:

    [2013] ‘A national Lokpal, however strong it may be, cannot resolve the problems of immorality in public affairs’. Discuss.

  • Fast Track Immigration Trusted Traveller Program (FTI- TTP)

    Why in the News?

    The Fast Track Immigration – Trusted Traveller Program (FTI-TTP) is set to expand to seven major Indian airports starting January 16, 2025, ensuring seamless and expedited immigration processes for Indian nationals and Overseas Citizen of India (OCI) cardholders.

    About the Fast Track Immigration Trusted Traveller Program (FTI- TTP)

    • Launched under the ‘Viksit Bharat @2047’ vision, it aims to establish world-class immigration facilities and enhance international mobility.
    • The Bureau of Immigration, under the Ministry of Home Affairs, is the nodal agency responsible for implementing the programme.
    • It was initially introduced on June 22, 2024, at Delhi’s Indira Gandhi International Airport (IGI).
    • It is targeted at Indian nationals and Overseas Citizen of India (OCI) cardholders in its first phase and will eventually include foreign travelers.
    • Phase-Wise Implementation:
      • Phase 1: Covers Indian citizens and OCI cardholders.
      • Phase 2: Will extend to foreign travelers.
    • The program is free of cost during its initial implementation phase.
    • By 2025, the program will be operational at 21 major airports across India.

    Features of the Program

    • Operates through e-gates or automated border gates for faster processing.
    • Travelers scan their boarding pass and passport, followed by biometric authentication, to complete the process.
    • Enrollment is completed through an online portal (https://ftittp.mha.gov.in), where applicants upload their details and required documents.
    • Membership is valid for a maximum of 5 years or until the passport’s validity, whichever comes first.
    • Applicants must ensure their passport has a minimum six-month validity at the time of registration.
    • White-listed trusted travelers undergo faster clearance while maintaining security standards.

    Significance  

    • Reduces immigration clearance time, providing a hassle-free travel experience for international travelers.
    • Biometric authentication ensures identity verification, reducing risks of fraudulent entries.
    • Travelers can bypass regular queues, making the process more convenient and seamless.
    • Comparable to the Global Entry Program in the United States, it aligns India’s immigration services with international standards.

    PYQ:

    [2021] With reference to India, consider the following statements:

    1. There is only one citizenship and one domicile.
    2. A citizen by birth only can become the Head of State.
    3. A foreigner once granted citizenship cannot be deprived of it under any circumstances.

    Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

    (a) 1 only
    (b) 2 only
    (c) 1 and 3
    (d) 2 and 3

  • [17th January 2025] The Hindu Op-ed: Great anniversaries of peace initiatives, a role for India

    PYQ Relevance:

    Q) In what ways would the ongoing US-Iran Nuclear Pact Controversy affect the national interest of India? How should India respond to its situation?  (UPSC CSE 2018)

    Mentor’s Comment: UPSC mains have always focused on the Nuclear Pact Controversy (2018), and ‘India a position in its global strategy ’ (2019).

    In 2025, we mark 80 years since the first nuclear test and the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, which killed up to 2,46,000 people. Citing the Bhagavad Gita, Oppenheimer described the destruction as “Death by a thousand suns.” On Nagasaki’s bombing day, Bertrand Russell warned humanity to choose between destruction or adopting wiser political thinking.

    Today’s editorial talks about the nuclear power challenges in the world due to nuclear proliferation by Countries. In this situation how India can play an important role in promoting peace. This content can be used in IR topics GS Paper 2.

    _

    Let’s learn!

    Why in the News? 

    It’s time for India to take action for peace since there are no great figures like Russell, Einstein, or Rotblat left to warn the world.

    What historical peace initiatives can serve as models for current and future efforts?

    • Russell-Einstein Manifesto (1955): This document, drafted by prominent scientists including Bertrand Russell and Albert Einstein, called for global disarmament and emphasized the need for humanity to remember its shared values over national interests.  
    • Avadi Resolution (1955): Passed by the Indian National Congress, this resolution called for the prohibition of atomic and hydrogen bombs and urged the United Nations to address the grave threat posed by nuclear weapons. It anticipated the need for global awareness regarding the dangers of war and weapons of mass destruction.
    • Rajiv Gandhi’s Action Plan (1988): This initiative aimed for a nuclear-free world and emphasized non-violence. Gandhi’s approach sought to engage international leaders in discussions about disarmament and peace, reflecting a commitment to global security.

    How can India leverage its unique position to contribute to global peace initiatives?

    • Nuclear Weapons State: As one of the nine countries with nuclear capabilities, India has a critical role in discussions about disarmament and non-proliferation. Its experience and perspective can foster dialogue among nuclear states and promote responsible stewardship of these weapons.
    • Historical Leadership: India’s past leadership in peace initiatives, such as the Avadi Resolution, positions it as a potential mediator in current geopolitical tensions. By advocating for disarmament based on historical precedents, India can influence global norms around nuclear weapons.
    • Cultural Emphasis on Non-Violence: India’s philosophical foundation in non-violence can be leveraged to promote peaceful resolutions to conflicts, encouraging other nations to adopt similar approaches in international relations.

    What challenges does India face in enhancing its role in international peace efforts?

    • Geopolitical Tensions: Ongoing conflicts with neighbouring countries, particularly Pakistan and China, complicate India’s ability to advocate for disarmament without appearing vulnerable. These tensions may hinder collaborative peace efforts.
    • Domestic Political Landscape: Political dynamics within India can affect its foreign policy priorities. A focus on national security may overshadow initiatives aimed at global peace, making it challenging to balance domestic concerns with international responsibilities.
    • Global Complacency: The prevailing complacency regarding nuclear threats poses a significant challenge. Despite historical lessons from events like the 2004 tsunami or nuclear bombings, many nations remain indifferent to the risks posed by nuclear arsenals, complicating efforts for collective action

    Way forward: 

    • Reviving Multilateral Engagements: India should initiate and lead international conferences focused on disarmament and the prevention of mass annihilation, drawing from its historical peace initiatives.  
    • Strengthening Regional Cooperation: India must work towards reducing regional tensions with neighbours through confidence-building measures, bilateral dialogues, and showcasing its commitment to non-aggression. This will enable it to credibly advocate for global disarmament and peace.

    https://www.thehindu.com/opinion/lead/great-anniversaries-of-peace-initiatives-a-role-for-india/article69105396.ece

  • An alliance of democracies with India at its core

    Why in the News?

    Europe and India need a stronger, more practical partnership and together with the United States, they can become an unbeatable force.

    Why do all democratic countries need to come together? 

    • Unified Front Against Authoritarianism: Democracies can counter coercive tactics and aggression from authoritarian regimes like China and Russia by standing together to deter threats to vulnerable nations, and reinforcing global stability.
    • Advocating Democratic Principles: A collective alliance provides a platform to promote democratic values such as human rights, the rule of law, and free markets fostering an international environment supportive of democracy.
    • Addressing Global Challenges Collaboratively: Democracies can pool resources and expertise to tackle global issues like climate change, terrorism, and public health crises through joint strategies and initiatives.
    • Strengthening Economic Ties: Enhanced economic cooperation within an alliance can promote free trade, reduce barriers, and create a resilient network to counter economic coercion from non-democratic states.
    • Bolstering Democratic Resilience: By sharing best practices, democracies can strengthen their institutions, address internal polarisation, and enhance resilience against threats to their democratic systems.

    What is the strategic importance of India in a global alliance of democracies?

    • Geopolitical Counterbalance: India serves as a crucial counterbalance to China in the Indo-Pacific region.
      • As a democracy with significant economic growth potential, India’s alignment with European democracies can help counter authoritarian influences, particularly from Russia and China, which pose threats to global democratic norms.
    • Economic Partnership: The EU-India relationship is economically significant, with India projected to become the world’s third-largest economy in the next decade.
      • Strengthening trade ties can enhance economic security for both parties and reduce dependency on China. The EU has recognised India as a ‘Trusted Partner’ in critical sectors such as technology and pharmaceuticals.
    • Shared Values: Both Europe and India share foundational values of democracy, rule of law, and human rights. This commonality provides a strong basis for collaboration on global issues such as climate change, security, and sustainable development.

    How can India contribute to the promotion and protection of democratic norms internationally?

    • Promoting Democratic Values: India can advocate for democratic governance and human rights on international platforms, leveraging its status as the world’s largest democracy to influence other nations positively.
    • Collaborative Initiatives: Through partnerships like the Trade and Technology Council (TTC), India can collaborate with Europe on emerging technologies and critical industries.
      • Such cooperation can promote transparency and ethical standards in technology development.
    • Defense Cooperation: India’s existing defense collaborations with the U.S. and its role in multilateral security frameworks like the Quad can be expanded to include European partners, enhancing collective security against authoritarian regimes.

    What challenges does India face in leading or participating in this alliance?

    • Balancing Relations with Russia and China: India’s historical ties with Russia complicate its position within a democratic alliance. While it seeks to maintain these relationships for strategic reasons, it must also navigate criticism from Western allies regarding its stance on Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.
    • Internal Democratic Challenges: India faces significant internal challenges related to its democratic processes, including concerns about political dissent and civil liberties.
      • Addressing these issues is essential for India to lead effectively within a global democratic alliance.
    • Trade Negotiation Stagnation: Ongoing negotiations for a Free Trade Agreement (FTA) between the EU and India have faced hurdles due to disagreements over sustainability measures and human rights issues.
      • Progress in these negotiations is crucial for realizing the full potential of their partnership.

    Way forward: 

    • Strengthening Internal Democracy and Rule of Law: India should address domestic concerns related to political dissent, civil liberties, and democratic processes to enhance its credibility and leadership role within a global democratic alliance.
    • Expanding Strategic Partnerships: India should accelerate negotiations on trade agreements, deepen collaboration in critical sectors like technology and defense, and align with democratic allies to counter authoritarian influences effectively.

    Mains PYQ:

    Q Indian and USA are two large democracies. Examine the basic tenets on which the two political systems are based. (UPSC IAS/2018) 

  • Costly HPV vaccine needs to be part of national immunisation programme

    Why in the News?

    The HPV vaccine works best if given before coming into contact with the virus. It is recommended for children aged 12 to 13 and for people who are more likely to get HPV.

    What are the health benefits of including the HPV vaccine in the national immunization program?

    • Prevention of Cervical Cancer: The HPV vaccine can prevent over 90% of cervical cancers caused by HPV, significantly reducing incidence rates and mortality associated with this disease.
    • Broader Cancer Protection: Vaccination also protects against other HPV-related cancers, including those of the vagina, vulva, penis, anus, and oropharynx, promoting overall public health.
    • Cost-Effectiveness: Early vaccination can lead to long-term savings in healthcare costs by reducing the need for cancer treatments and associated healthcare services.
    • Equity and Accessibility: Making the HPV vaccine part of the national immunization program would enhance accessibility for all demographics, particularly in low- and middle-income regions where cervical cancer rates are disproportionately high.

    What are the economic implications of integrating the HPV vaccine into the national immunization program?

    • Healthcare Savings: By preventing cervical cancer, the integration of the HPV vaccine into the national immunization program can lead to substantial reductions in treatment costs and hospitalizations related to advanced cancer stages.
    • Increased Productivity: Healthier populations contribute to economic productivity as fewer individuals suffer from debilitating illnesses that impede work and social engagement.
    • Investment in Public Health: Allocating resources for HPV vaccination can enhance public health infrastructure and create a more robust healthcare system capable of addressing other health issues.

    What are the barriers to HPV vaccination? 

    • High Vaccine Costs: The prohibitive cost of HPV vaccines like Gardasil and Cervarix limits their accessibility for many Indian families. Although the indigenous vaccine, CERVAVAC, offers a more affordable alternative, affordability remains a key barrier to widespread vaccination.
    • Low Awareness Levels: A significant lack of awareness about HPV and its link to cervical cancer results in poor understanding of the vaccine’s benefits, contributing to low acceptance and coverage rates.
    • Cultural and Social Stigma: Cultural taboos around sexual health and reproductive issues discourage parents from vaccinating children, particularly girls, due to misconceptions about the vaccine’s necessity or fears of promoting promiscuity.
    • Gender Bias in Vaccination Efforts: The focus on HPV as a women-centric infection leads to insufficient promotion of vaccination among boys and young men, perpetuating gender disparities in healthcare and reducing overall campaign effectiveness.
    • Policy and Budgetary Constraints: Despite recommendations for including the HPV vaccine in national immunization programs, delays caused by budgetary limitations and competing health priorities hinder its integration and accessibility.

    What strategies can be employed to overcome barriers to HPV vaccination uptake? (Way forward)

    • Awareness Campaigns: Implementing educational initiatives to inform communities about the benefits and safety of the HPV vaccine can help dispel myths and cultural stigmas surrounding vaccination.
    • Subsidizing Costs: Reducing the financial burden through government subsidies or integrating the vaccine into public health programs can improve accessibility for lower-income populations.
    • Engaging Healthcare Providers: Training healthcare professionals to communicate the importance of HPV vaccination effectively can encourage more patients to get vaccinated, particularly among hesitant parents and young adults.

    Mains PYQ:

    Q What is the basic principle behind vaccine development? How do vaccines work? What approaches were adopted by the Indian vaccine manufacturers to produce COVID-19 vaccines? (UPSC IAS/2022)