💥Join UPSC 2027,2028 Mentorship (July Batch) + XFactor Notes & Microthemes PDF
Talk to Mentor

Civilsdaily

Login

GS Paper: GS2

  • Mahua Moitra has no excuse

    Key Supreme Court hearing in TMC's Mahua Moitra case today. Details | Latest News India - Hindustan Times

    Key Highlights:

    • Mahua Moitra, a former investment banker turned politician, faced allegations of sharing her Parliament ID and password with an industrialist to post questions about a rival group.
    • The Ethics Committee recommended her expulsion from Parliament, and on December 8, the motion for expulsion was adopted through a voice vote.
    • Moitra admitted to sharing her ID and password, receiving gifts, and made broader allegations that many MPs do not draft their own questions.

    Key Challenges:

    • The credibility of Parliament is at stake due to false claims by Moitra and another MP, Giridhari Yadav, that MPs generally do not frame their own questions.
    • The issue of MPs sharing their ID and password, a violation of rules, raises concerns about the security and integrity of parliamentary processes.
    • The definition of “cash for query” is debated, involving considerations of gifts, hospitality, and other non-monetary benefits.

    Key Terms:

    • Parliament Portal: The online platform where MPs submit questions, Zero Hour submissions, and Special Mentions.
    • Ethics Committee: A parliamentary committee responsible for examining matters related to the ethical conduct of MPs.
    • Cash for Query: The alleged practice of accepting material benefits in exchange for asking questions in Parliament.

    Key Phrases:

    • “Cash for query”
    • “Parliamentary question”
    • “Expulsion from Parliament”
    • “Ethics Committee”
    • “ID and password sharing”
    • “Motion for expulsion”
    • “Voice vote”

    Key Quotes:

    • Giridhari Yadav: “Even I do not remember my password. My PA knows it. I have not asked any questions, thinking God knows what will happen.”
    • Speaker’s Response: “I request all MPs to frame their questions themselves and put it up. No one else is allowed to do that.”

    Key Examples and References:

    • Mahua Moitra’s admission to sharing her ID and password, receiving gifts, and the subsequent recommendation for expulsion by the Ethics Committee.
    • Giridhari Yadav’s statement about not framing his own questions and relying on his PA.

    Key Statements:

    • Sharing ID and password with an outsider is a gross violation of parliamentary rules.
    • Moitra’s confession and broader allegations cast doubt on the autonomy of MPs in drafting their questions.

    Key Facts:

    • Moitra graduated from Mount Holyoke College, worked as an investment banker, and joined politics with stints in the Indian National Congress and Trinamool Congress.
    • The motion for expulsion was adopted through a voice vote after the Opposition walked out of Parliament.

    Key Data:

    • Date of Mahua Moitra’s expulsion: December 8
    • Number of questions MPs are allowed to submit: Five (two starred and three unstarred).

    Critical Analysis:

    • False claims about MPs not framing their own questions undermine the reputation of Parliament.
    • The issue of ID and password sharing raises questions about the security of parliamentary processes.
    • The definition of “cash for query” is explored, considering various non-monetary benefits.

    Way Forward:

    • Strengthen security measures to prevent unauthorized access to parliamentary portals.
    • Emphasize the importance of MPs independently framing their questions for the integrity of parliamentary proceedings.
    • Address the broader ethical concerns raised by Moitra’s allegations to maintain the credibility of Parliament.

  • New criminal law Bills endanger civil liberties

    Revamp Of Criminal Laws - PWOnlyIAS

    Central idea 

    The article critiques the withdrawal and reintroduction of criminal law bills in India, highlighting concerns over civil liberties, overcriminalisation, and expanded police powers. It emphasizes the alarming increase in police custody duration and the absence of a transformative vision in the proposed legislations.

    Key Highlights:

    • Legislative Changes: The government withdraws and reintroduces criminal law bills, including Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS-II), Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS-II), and Bharatiya Sakshya Bill (BSB-II), reflecting potential shifts in the criminal justice system.
    • Concerns Over State Control: The bills raise concerns about the expansion of state control, overcriminalisation, and enhanced police powers, potentially compromising civil liberties and increasing the risk of police excesses.
    • Police Custody Duration: The BNSS proposes a significant increase in the maximum duration of police custody, from 15 days to 60 or 90 days, raising concerns about potential exposure to abuse and coercion.

    Key Challenges:

    • Risk of Overcriminalisation: The bills introduce broadly worded offenses, especially related to the security of the state, potentially leading to overcriminalisation and ambiguous legal provisions.
    • Expanded Police Powers: The BNSS’s expansion of police custody duration, combined with vague offenses, raises concerns about the potential for misuse of power and coercive tactics.
    • Lack of Transformative Vision: The bills lack a transformative vision for criminal law and justice, potentially entrenching colonial-era logic and emphasizing state control over citizen liberties.

    Key Terms and Phrases:

    • Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS-II): A proposed legislation to replace the Indian Penal Code (IPC, 1860), reflecting potential changes in criminal law.
    • Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS-II): A bill aimed at replacing the Criminal Procedure Code (CPC, 1973) with potential implications for civil liberties and police powers.
    • Bharatiya Sakshya Bill (BSB-II): Legislation seeking to replace the Indian Evidence Act (IEA, 1872), indicating potential shifts in the criminal justice system.

    Key Quotes and Statements:

    • “The expansion under the proposed BNSS heightens the risk of exposure to police excesses… a shocking expansion of police powers.”
    • “These Bills present a missed opportunity to correct the entrenched injustices of our criminal justice system.”

    Key Examples and References:

    • Overcriminalisation Concerns: The bills introduce broadly framed offenses, including criminalizing misinformation, raising fears of overcriminalisation and potential misuse.
    • Expansion of Police Custody: The BNSS proposes a substantial increase in the duration of police custody, contributing to concerns about potential abuse and coercive practices.

    Key Facts and Data:

    • Duration of Police Custody: The BNSS proposes expanding the maximum limit of police custody from 15 days to either 60 or 90 days, depending on the nature of the offense.

    Critical Analysis:

    • Missed Opportunity: The bills are criticized for not addressing deep-seated issues in the criminal justice system and potentially entrenching colonial-era logic without a transformative vision.
    • Efficiency vs. Fairness: Emphasizes that goals of speedy justice and effective investigation, while important, cannot be achieved without addressing structural barriers and ensuring fairness.

    Way Forward:

    • Comprehensive Regulatory Ecosystem: Advocates for a regulatory framework ensuring fairness, transparency, and accountability, especially in the context of expanded police powers and overcriminalisation.
    • Structural Reforms: Emphasizes the need for fundamental transformations in the criminal justice system, addressing issues like judicial vacancies, infrastructure, and scientific validity of forensic methods.

  • Work of consultancy firms with government must be regulated

    Return of the 'consultocracy' – how cutting public service jobs to save costs usually backfires

    Central idea 

    The article explores into the growing reliance on consulting firms for policy formulation and program implementation in Indian government projects. It raises concerns about potential downsides, such as the hollowing out of government capabilities, excessive dependence, and the risk of lobbying and corruption scandals. While acknowledging the benefits, the author calls for a balanced approach, emphasizing the necessity of a regulatory framework to ensure fairness, transparency, and knowledge transfer.

    Key Highlights:

    • Rise of Consulting in Government: Government projects, including major initiatives like Ganga cleaning and Swachh Bharat, heavily rely on consulting firms for policy formulation and program implementation.
    • Proliferation of Global Consulting Firms: Reports reveal that Indian ministries paid around Rs 5,000 million in fees to global consulting firms in the last five years, prompting the finance ministry to seek details of these engagements.
    • Concerns Over Dependence: There are concerns about a potential hollowing out of government capabilities due to excessive reliance on consultants, leading to mission creep, repeated redeployment, and potential lobbying for repeat work.

    Key Challenges:

    • Hollowing of Government Capabilities: The unbridled use of consulting firms raises concerns about a decline in the skills and capabilities of government officials, potentially infantilizing government institutions.
    • Mission Creep and Dependence: Excessive dependence on consulting teams may result in mission creep, where routine functions are outsourced, and officials become overly reliant on consultants, risking a loss of institutional knowledge and skills.
    • Consulting-Related Corruption: The global trend of consulting firms influencing policy directions and engaging in lobbying raises concerns about corruption scandals and the distortion of public policy objectives.

    Key Terms and Phrases:

    • Programme Management Units: Consulting firms often establish these units with broad mandates, attached to senior officials, leading to potential mission creep and dependence.
    • Consultocracy: A term coined to describe the permeation of consultants into the core of government, diminishing the traditional role and capabilities of public servants.
    • Digitisation of Public Service Delivery: The increasing complexity of public service delivery, including initiatives like the Direct Benefit Transfer program, demands specialized technical expertise.

    Key Quotes and Statements for mains value addition:

    • “There is a tendency to farm out even routine functions like preparing file notes and letters.”
    • “The unbridled use of consultants reduces the skills and capabilities of officials, thus infantilising government.”

    Key Examples and References:

    • Global Consulting Influence: Books like “The Big Con” and “When McKinsey Comes to Town” highlight concerns about the influence of consulting firms, even leading governments down amoral pathways.
    • Consulting in Indian Ministries: Reports indicate that Indian ministries paid substantial fees to global consulting firms in the last five years, prompting regulatory scrutiny.

    Key Facts and Data:

    • Financial Transactions: Indian ministries paid approximately Rs 5,000 million in fees to global consulting firms over the last five years.

    Critical Analysis:

    • Balancing Act: Acknowledges the benefits of consulting expertise in tackling complex challenges but emphasizes the need for a regulatory framework to prevent overdependence and potential pitfalls.

    Way Forward:

    • Regulatory Ecosystem: Advocates for a comprehensive regulatory ecosystem addressing fairness, transparency, curbing rent-seeking behaviors, and ensuring knowledge transfer to government.
    • Calibrated Onboarding: Suggests a carefully calibrated onboarding of expertise from the private sector within a normative and transparent regulatory framework to enhance public service delivery.

  • Narendra Modi writes on Article 370 verdict: Today, a clean canvas for every child in J&K

    Narendra Modi writes on Article 370 verdict: Today, a clean canvas for every child in J&K | The Indian Express

    Note for students: This article is written by our prime minister hence it becomes very important from UPSC Perspective. 

    Central idea 

    The text discusses the historic Supreme Court judgment upholding the abrogation of Articles 370 and 35(A) in Jammu and Kashmir. It highlights the positive impact of this decision, emphasizing a shift towards grassroots democracy and renewed focus on development in the region. The author advocates for continued engagement, national integration, and sustained efforts to address historical challenges.

    Key Highlights:

    • Historic Supreme Court Judgment: Upheld the abrogation of Articles 370 and 35(A), emphasizing India’s sovereignty.
    • Long-standing Issues: Jammu, Kashmir, and Ladakh faced violence and instability for seven decades.
    • Leadership Perspective: The author expresses commitment to addressing people’s aspirations and removing perceived injustices.
    • Articles 370 and 35(A) as Obstacles: Seen as major hindrances to development and rights in Jammu and Kashmir.
    • Development Initiatives: Government implemented various initiatives, including a 2015 special package, to address infrastructure, job creation, tourism, and handicraft industry support.
    • Grassroots Democracy: Last four years witnessed renewed focus, improving representation for women, SCs, STs, and marginalized sections.
    • Positive Impact of Abrogation: Visible development, improved infrastructure, increased tourist inflows, and a boost to various government schemes.

    Key Challenges:

    • Historical Confusion: Stemming from centuries of colonization, leading to a lack of clarity on basic issues.
    • Violence and Instability: Jammu, Kashmir, and Ladakh experienced the worst forms of violence and instability for seven decades.
    • Initial Choice at Independence: The narrative suggests a choice between a fresh start for national integration and continuing with a confused approach.

    Key Terms and Phrases:

    • Articles 370 and 35(A): Constitutional provisions abrogated to enhance constitutional integration.
    • Karyakarta: Term referring to a political worker or activist.
    • Insaniyat, Jamhooriyat, and Kashmiriyat: A message emphasizing humanity, democracy, and the unique cultural identity of Kashmir.
    • Fit India Dialogues: Dialogues promoting fitness and well-being.
    • Panchayat Polls: Elections at the grassroots level for local self-governance.

    Key Quotes and Statements:

    • “August 5, 2019, is etched in the hearts and minds of every Indian.”
    • “The people of J&K want development and they want to contribute to the development of India based on their strengths and skills.”
    • “The success of Panchayat polls indicated the democratic nature of the people of J&K.”

    Key Examples and References:

    • Afshan Ashiq: Mentioned as a talented footballer symbolizing positive change from stone-pelting to sports.
    • Dr. Syama Prasad Mookerjee: Quoted for quitting the Nehru Cabinet over the Kashmir issue, becoming a source of inspiration.
    • Atal ji’s “Insaniyat, Jamhooriyat, and Kashmiriyat” message: Referenced as a source of great inspiration.

    Key Facts and Data:

    • Over 150 ministerial visits from May 2014 to March 2019: Highlighting the government’s effort to interact directly with the people of Jammu and Kashmir.
    • Special assistance of Rs 1,000 crore announced in 2014 for rehabilitation after floods: Demonstrating the government’s commitment during crises.
    • Saturation of key central government schemes: Mentioned in sectors like Saubhagya, Ujjwala, housing, tap water connections, and financial inclusion.

    Critical Analysis:

    • Positive Impact of Abrogation: The author emphasizes the positive changes and development in Jammu, Kashmir, and Ladakh post the abrogation of Articles 370 and 35(A).
    • Renewed Faith in Grassroots Democracy: The text suggests a positive shift towards grassroots democracy, with increased representation for marginalized sections.
    • Historical Confusion and Choices: The narrative criticizes historical confusion and advocates for a clearer approach at the time of independence.

    Way Forward:

    • Continued Development: Continue the focus on development, infrastructure, and addressing the aspirations of the people.
    • Sustained Grassroots Engagement: Maintain engagement at the grassroots level, ensuring representation for all sections of society.
    • National Integration: Strengthen the spirit of “Ek Bharat, Shreshtha Bharat” for unity and good governance.

  • From America to India: Academic freedom is misunderstood

    Academic Freedom in Indian Educational Institutions – NICKELED AND DIMED

    Central idea 

    The article explores the global challenges to academic freedom, accentuated by the Israeli-Palestinian conflict’s impact on protests in the West and restrictive measures in India. It emphasizes the practical and misunderstood nature of academic freedom, highlighting the crucial role it plays in fostering critical thinking within the academic community and the threats posed by government interference.

    Key Highlights:

    • Israeli-Palestinian Conflict Impact: The Israeli-Palestinian conflict sheds light on the challenges to academic freedom in the West, with protests facing severe threats and legal consequences.
    • Global Restrictions on Dissent: The credibility of academic freedom faces a global crisis, as European governments pass laws punishing dissent against the state of Israel, mirroring actions taken in the West.
    • Indian Context: In India, authorities align with Western counterparts, stifling protests, banning events, and demanding apologies from speakers critical of the Israeli state.

    Key Challenges:

    • Threats and Challenges in the West: Protests in American universities against the Israeli-Palestinian conflict provoke threats from donors, alumni, and administrators, showcasing the fragility of academic freedom.
    • Public Misunderstanding: The public perceives academic freedom as a privilege for already pampered professors, undermining its significance and practical application.
    • Government Interference in India: Indian authorities pre-empt protests, ban events, and cancel talks, aligning with Western counterparts and limiting academic freedom.

    Key Terms and Phrases:

    • Academic Freedom: Autonomy granted to the practice of academics, allowing the pursuit of ideas and knowledge without external constraints.
    • Aam Aadmi: The common person’s perspective on academic freedom as a perk for professors, contributing to a misunderstanding of its true nature.
    • Central Civil Service (CCS) Rules: Government regulations governing officials, potentially threatening academic freedom if applied to academics.

    Key Quotes and Statements:

    • “The credibility of this idea is in tatters today as protests against the war in American universities provoke threats from donors, alumni and administrators…”
    • “Each of its two words misleads in its own way. ‘Academic’ suggests something obscure and impractical, far removed from the everyday world…”
    • “But despite the global attention it is now receiving, academic freedom remains a much misunderstood idea.”

    Key Examples and References:

    • Israeli-Palestinian Conflict Impact: The conflict serves as a catalyst for threats against academic freedom in the West, revealing global implications.
    • Indian Authorities’ Actions: Actions such as pre-empting protests, banning events, and canceling talks illustrate restrictions on academic freedom in India.

    Key Facts and Data:

    • Instances of protests in American universities facing threats from donors, alumni, and administrators highlight the vulnerabilities of academic freedom.
    • European governments passing laws to defund and punish academic or artistic activities critical of Israel contribute to the global erosion of academic freedom.
    • The University Grants Commission (UGC) directive in India, suggesting the installation of “selfie points” with the Prime Minister’s picture, showcases government interference.

    Critical Analysis:

    • Misunderstood Practicality: Academic freedom is portrayed as misunderstood, practical, and down-to-earth, yet specific to the academic world.
    • Scrutiny Within Academic Community: The article emphasizes the scrutiny and criticism within the academic community, balancing autonomy with adherence to academic norms.
    • Impact of Government Control: Potential consequences of government control, as seen in the threat to universities under Central Civil Service (CCS) rules, are discussed.

    Way Forward:

    • Fostering Critical Thinking: Emphasize the practicality and necessity of academic freedom in fostering critical thinking for societal benefit.
    • Resisting Government Interference: Advocate for the protection of academic autonomy, resisting government interference that could stifle questioning and research.
    • Promoting Public Awareness: Promote public awareness and understanding of academic freedom to counter misconceptions and ensure its preservation.

  • Kidney Transplants in India: Law, Demand and Alleged Rackets

    Kidney Transplants

    Central Idea

    • The government has initiated an investigation into allegations that poor villagers from Myanmar were coerced into selling their kidneys to wealthy patients, with Delhi’s Apollo hospital implicated in the scheme.

    India’s Transplant Law and Kidney Scams

    • India’s Transplantation Law: The Transplantation of Human Organs and Tissues Act, 1994, in India allows organ donations from living persons, primarily close relatives, and deceased donors.
    • Curb on organ trade: It strictly prohibits organ trade to prevent exploitation of the poor.
    • Previous Allegations: This isn’t the first instance of alleged kidney scams in India, with most rackets reportedly using forged documents to establish fake donor-recipient relationships.

    Procedure for Legal Transplants

    • Documentation for Close Relatives: For living donations involving close relatives, both Indian and foreign nationals must submit identity proofs, family trees, relationship evidence, and financial status documents.
    • Scrutiny for Unrelated Donors: Donations from non-relatives require additional evidence of long-term association and undergo rigorous examination by an external committee to prevent illegal transactions.
    • Penalties for Illegal Organ Trade: The law imposes severe punishments, including imprisonment and hefty fines, for any involvement in organ trade or related illegal activities.

    Kidney Transplants: High Demand and Target for Illegal Trade

    • High Demand: Approximately 2 lakh Indians annually reach end-stage kidney failure, necessitating transplants or dialysis, but only about 12,000 transplants occur each year.
    • Low Risk and Accessibility: Kidney transplants pose the least risk to donors and are relatively affordable and widely available in India, making kidneys a common target for illegal trade.
    • Organ Viability: Kidneys can survive outside the body for 24-36 hours, longer than lungs or liver, increasing their viability for transplants.

    Addressing the Organ Supply Gap

    • Promoting Deceased Donations: Increasing awareness and promoting donations from brain-dead individuals can significantly enhance the organ pool.
    • Government Initiatives: The government has introduced an Aadhaar-linked donor registry to encourage deceased donations, which currently constitute only 16% of total transplants in India.
    • Reducing Transplant Necessity: Efforts are also needed to decrease the number of people requiring organ transplants.

    Conclusion

    • Combating Illegal Organ Trade: The ongoing investigation into the alleged kidney racket highlights the need for stringent vigilance and adherence to legal procedures in organ transplants.
    • Enhancing Legal Organ Donation: Increasing public awareness and promoting legal avenues for organ donation are crucial steps in addressing the organ supply-demand gap and preventing exploitation in organ trade.

  • Legislative Development in Election Commission Appointments

    election commissioner

    Central Idea

    • The Rajya Sabha passed a bill that revises the process for appointing the Chief Election Commissioner (CEC) and Election Commissioners (ECs), replacing the Election Commission (Conditions of Service of Election Commissioners and Transaction of Business) Act, 1991.

    Election Commission Appointments Bill:Key Features

    • Appointment Process: The President will appoint the CEC and ECs based on recommendations from a Selection Committee comprising the Prime Minister, a Union Cabinet Minister, and the Leader of Opposition in Lok Sabha.
    • Search Committee Role: A Search Committee led by the Cabinet Secretary will suggest candidates to the Selection Committee.
    • Eligibility Criteria: Candidates must have held a post equivalent to the Secretary to the central government.
    • Salary and Conditions: The CEC and ECs will receive salaries and benefits equivalent to the Cabinet Secretary, a change from the previous equivalence to a Supreme Court judge.

    Constitutional Context

    • Constitutional Provisions: Article 324 of the Constitution allows the President to appoint the CEC and ECs but does not specify the appointment process.
    • Supreme Court Directive: In March 2023, the Supreme Court mandated a selection process involving the Prime Minister, Leader of Opposition, and the Chief Justice of India, until Parliament legislates otherwise.

    Key Issues and Analysis

    • Independence Concerns: The government-dominated Selection Committee could impact the Election Commission’s independence.
    • Validity despite Vacancies: The Selection Committee’s recommendations will be valid even with vacancies, potentially leading to government control in appointments.
    • Salary and Status: Aligning the CEC and ECs’ salary with the Cabinet Secretary, determined by the government, may affect their independence compared to a salary fixed by Parliament.
    • Exclusion of Candidates: Limiting eligibility to senior bureaucrats may exclude other qualified individuals, particularly those with judicial experience.
    • International Practices: The appointment processes for election commissions in countries like South Africa, the UK, the US, and Canada vary, with some involving judicial members or parliamentary approval.

    Concerns over Independence and Selection Process

    • Government Influence: The Bill’s provisions for a government-majority Selection Committee and the acceptance of recommendations despite vacancies could lead to executive dominance in appointments.
    • Salary and Removal Parity: The change in salary equivalence and the lack of parity in the removal process of the CEC and ECs compared to Supreme Court judges raise concerns about the Commission’s independence.

    Goswami Committee (1990) Recommendations

    • Background: The Goswami Committee on Electoral Reforms (1990) made significant recommendations regarding the Election Commission’s functioning.
    • Appointment Process: The Committee suggested that the CEC should be appointed by the President in consultation with the Chief Justice and the Leader of Opposition in Lok Sabha. For ECs, it recommended a similar process but included the CEC in the consultative process.
    • Importance of Independence: The Committee emphasized the need for the Election Commission’s independence from executive influence to ensure free and fair elections.

    Conclusion

    • Ensuring ECI’s Autonomy: While the Bill aims to formalize the appointment process for the CEC and ECs, maintaining the Election Commission’s autonomy and independence is crucial for upholding democratic principles.
    • Need for Deliberation: The concerns raised about the Bill highlight the need for careful consideration to ensure that the Election Commission remains an impartial and effective guardian of electoral integrity in India.

  • Explained: SC Verdict on Abrogation of Article 370

    Article 370

    Central Idea

    • A Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court on Monday unanimously upheld the power of the President to abrogate Article 370 in August 2019, leading to the reorganisation of the full-fledged State of Jammu and Kashmir to two Union Territories and denuding it of its special privileges.

    Key Issues and Court’s Findings

    [A] On the Sovereignty of Jammu and Kashmir:

    • Petitioners’ Claim: They argued that J&K retained an element of sovereignty when it acceded to India in 1947, different from other princely states.
    • Court’s Examination: The Court noted that J&K was listed as a Part III state in the Indian Constitution and Section 3 of J&K’s Constitution declared it an integral part of India.
    • Final Ruling: The Court held that J&K did not retain sovereignty, and the process of integration was ongoing, culminating in the Presidential declaration under Article 370(3).

    [B] Whether Article 370 is Temporary or Permanent:

    • Arguments Presented: Petitioners argued for Article 370’s permanence, while others viewed it as temporary.
    • Court’s Opinion: Both CJI Chandrachud and Justice Kaul concurred that Article 370 was a temporary provision.

    [C] Legality of Abrogating Article 370:

    • Abrogation Process: On August 5, 2019, President Ram Nath Kovind issued CO 272, amending Article 367 and redefining “Constituent Assembly of Jammu and Kashmir” as the “Legislative Assembly of Jammu and Kashmir.”
    • Court’s Upholding: The Court upheld this process, with CJI Chandrachud stating that post-dissolution of J&K’s Constituent Assembly, the President could have unilaterally abrogated Article 370.

    [D] Actions Under President’s Rule:

    • Challenge to Union’s Actions: The challenge was to the extent of powers appropriated under Article 356 (President’s rule).
    • Reference to Bommai Ruling: The Court, citing the 1994 Bommai ruling, stated that actions under the President’s rule must not be mala fide or irrational.

    Upholding Centre’s (Union) Supremacy

    • Parliament’s Unilateral Actions: The Court’s interpretation suggests Parliament can change a state’s status under the President’s rule.
    • Article 3 Reference: The President referred the Jammu and Kashmir Reorganisation Bill, 2019, to Parliament for its views, as the state was under President’s rule.
    • Validity of Executive Orders: The Court applied Bommai ruling standards to validate the executive orders, emphasizing the need for proof of mala fides to challenge the actions.

    Conclusion

    • J&K’s Integral Status Affirmed: The Court conclusively ruled that J&K has always been an integral part of India.
    • Temporary Nature of Article 370: The ruling clarifies that Article 370 was a temporary provision.
    • Expansion of Union Powers: The judgment potentially expands the Union’s powers under President’s rule, affecting the federal balance.
    • Constitutional Precedent: This ruling sets a significant precedent in interpreting Union and state powers, reflecting on the dynamics of Indian federalism.

  • Karan Singh’s Proclamation of 1949

    karan singh

    Central Idea

    • On December 11, the Supreme Court upheld the abrogation of Article 370, affirming that Jammu and Kashmir (J&K) did not retain sovereignty after joining the Union of India.
    • CJI D Y Chandrachud, writing for himself and Justices B R Gavai and Surya Kant, cited a 1949 proclamation by Yuvraj Karan Singh (successor of J&K titular Maharaja) as a key factor in this decision.

    Karan Singh’s 1949 Proclamation

    • Repeal of the Government of India Act, 1935: The proclamation declared the repeal of the Government of India Act, 1935, which previously governed J&K’s constitutional relationship with India.
    • Adoption of the Indian Constitution: It stated that the Indian Constitution would govern J&K’s relationship with the Union of India and abrogate inconsistent constitutional provisions in the state.

    Reason behind the Proclamation

    • Karan Singh’s Perspective: Speaking to The Indian Express, Karan Singh, aged 92, explained that the proclamation was necessary to eliminate ambiguity regarding J&K’s integration with India.
    • Instrument of Accession’s Ambiguity: He noted that while his father, Hari Singh, signed the Instrument of Accession like other rulers, J&K retained a measure of autonomy, leading to questions about its complete integration.

    Supreme Court’s Findings

    • Essence of the Judgment: The Court stated that J&K did not retain any form of sovereignty upon joining India.
    • Significance of the 1949 Proclamation: The Court highlighted that Karan Singh’s proclamation superseded all constitutional provisions inconsistent with the Indian Constitution, effectively surrendering J&K’s sovereignty.

    Alignment with the Centre’s Argument

    • Centre’s Stance: The Union government argued that the 1949 proclamation acknowledged the supremacy of the Indian Constitution and surrendered sovereignty to it, where the sovereign is ‘We the people of India’.
    • Court’s Agreement: The Supreme Court’s ruling aligns with this argument, affirming the complete integration of J&K into India.

    Conclusion

    • The Supreme Court’s decision clarifies the constitutional status of J&K post the abrogation of Article 370, confirming its full integration into the Indian Union without any retained sovereignty.
    • The ruling underscores the historical context of J&K’s accession and the role of the 1949 proclamation in shaping its constitutional relationship with India.

  • SR Bommai Judgment and its Relevance in Article 370 Verdict

    Central Idea

    • The Supreme Court’s reliance on the 1994 SR Bommai judgment was pivotal in upholding the abrogation of Article 370.
    • The SR Bommai case is a landmark judgment interpreting Article 356 of the Constitution, which deals with President’s rule in states.

    SR Bommai Case: An Overview

    • Origin of the Case: The case arose from the dismissal of the Janata Dal-led Karnataka government in 1989 by the Congress-led central government.
    • Governor’s Recommendation: Karnataka Governor P Venkatasubbaiah recommended President’s rule citing the loss of majority by Chief Minister SR SR Bommai and the inability of other parties to form a government.
    • Controversy: The move was controversial, especially as some MLAs later retracted their withdrawal of support, claiming their signatures were obtained by misrepresentation.

    Supreme Court’s Verdict in the Case

    • Judicial Review of President’s Proclamation: The Court unanimously held that the President’s proclamation is subject to judicial review on several grounds, including illegality, malafide, and abuse of power.
    • Parliamentary Approval Requirement: The verdict mandated Parliamentary approval for imposing President’s rule. Without this approval, the dismissed government would automatically be revived after two months.
    • Centre-State Relationship: The ruling emphasized the autonomy of states, stating that greater power at the Centre does not reduce states to mere appendages.

    Impact of the Ruling

    • Scrutiny of Governor’s Conduct: This was one of the first judgments to scrutinize the Governor’s role, especially in the context of frequent impositions of President’s rule.
    • Decrease in President’s Rule Impositions: Research indicates a significant decrease in the frequency of President’s rule post-SR Bommai , from an average of 2.5 times a year (1950-1994) to just over once a year (1995-2021).

    Kashmir Reference in the Article 370 Ruling

    • Key Question: The central question was whether Article 370 could be abrogated while J&K was under President’s rule, which had been in place since 2018.
    • Supreme Court’s Reliance on SR Bommai: The Court used the SR Bommai ruling to validate the President’s actions in J&K, applying the standards set by Justices PB Sawant and Jeevan Reddy for testing the validity of executive orders.

    Conclusion

    • Influence on Federal Dynamics: The SR Bommai judgment continues to influence the balance of power between the Centre and states, ensuring judicial oversight over central interventions in state governance.
    • Relevance in Contemporary Rulings: Its principles, particularly regarding judicial review and the autonomy of states, remain crucial in contemporary constitutional interpretations, as seen in the Article 370 ruling.