💥Join UPSC 2027,2028 Mentorship (July Batch) + XFactor Notes & Microthemes PDF
Talk to Mentor

Civilsdaily

Login

GS Paper: GS3

  • Why are Killer Whales offering fresh prey to humans?

    Why in the News?

    A new study in the Journal of Comparative Psychology documents rare instances of Killer Whales (Orcinus orca) sharing freshly killed prey with humans.

    Why are Killer Whales offering fresh prey to humans?

    About Killer Whales (Orcinus orca):

    • Overview: Largest member of the dolphin family (Delphinidae), often called “wolves of the sea”.
    • Apex predators: At the top of the marine food chain.
    • Physical traits:
      • Black dorsal side, white underside, distinctive eye patch, saddle patch behind dorsal fin.
      • Can grow up to 9 m, weigh over 5,000 kg, and swim up to 54 km/hr.
    • Social structure: Live in pods led by a matriarch; highly coordinated hunters using complex tactics.
    • Distribution: Found in all oceans worldwide, from polar to tropical seas, in both open and coastal waters.
    • IUCN – Data Deficient: But many regional populations face threats from climate change, prey decline, and pollution.

    Why do they offer their fresh prey to humans?

    • Study Findings (2004–2024):
      • Killer whales were observed offering whole prey to humans (fish, birds, mammals, etc.) in multiple oceans.
      • In most cases, they waited for a human response before reclaiming or abandoning prey.
    • Possible Reasons:
      • Exploration/Curiosity: Reflects their advanced cognition and social curiosity; a way to learn about humans.
      • Prosocial Behaviour: They are among the few species that share food within and outside their groups.
      • Play Theory Rejected: Behaviour not limited to juveniles; adults also involved, often with whole prey.
      • Scientific Thinking Analogy: Behaviour resembles “asking questions” and testing human reactions — a form of exploratory intelligence.
      • Machiavellian Behaviour: Could sometimes be manipulative, as killer whales are known to steal fish and disrupt vessels.
    [UPSC 2023] Which one of the following makes a tool with a stick to scrape insects from a hole in a tree or a log of wood?

    Options: (a) Fishing cat (b) Orangutan * (c) Otter (d) Sloth bear

     

  • Fireflies emerge as Ecological Indicators

    Why in the News?

    A recent study in Tamil Nadu documented multiple firefly species and highlighted their role as ecological indicators of habitat health.

    About Fireflies and their behaviour traits:

    • Identity: Bioluminescent beetles (not true flies) of the family Lampyridae.
    • Life Cycle: Larvae live in soil/leaf litter feeding on snails and worms; adults emerge after rains and live briefly to reproduce.
    • Indian Species: Abscondita chinensis, Luciola ovalis, Luciola nicolleri, Asymmetricata humeralis, Pyrocoelia analis.
    • Distribution: Found in tropical and temperate regions; most visible on humid monsoon nights.
    • Bioluminescence: Glow produced in abdominal light organ using luciferin, luciferase, oxygen, and ATP.
    • Light Nature: Cold and efficient, colours vary between green and yellow depending on species.
    • Courtship Function: Flashing used as mating signal; males emit species-specific codes, females respond if correct.

    Ecological Role and Conservation Significance:

    • Sensitivity: Strongly affected by pesticides, habitat loss, artificial lights, and polluted water.
    • Habitat Health Indicator: Large synchronised gatherings reflect intact ecosystems; sparse numbers signal disturbance.
    • Light Pollution Impact: Artificial lighting disrupts flashing, forcing males to waste energy and reducing mating success.
    • Local Evidences: Communities like the Malasar and Irula report declines linked to pesticides and polluted streams.
    • Indicator Role: Act as proxy species for nocturnal biodiversity, signalling risks to moths, bats, and amphibians.
    [UPSC 2024] Which one of the following shows a unique relationship with an insect that has coevolved with it and that is the only insect that can pollinate this tree?

    Options: (a) Fig* (b) Mahua (c) Sandalwood (d) Silk cotton

     

  • [30th August 2025] The Hindu Op-ed: In an unstable world, energy sovereignty is the new oil

    PYQ Relevance

    [UPSC 2017] The question of India’s Energy Security constitutes the most important part of India’s economic progress. Analyze India’s energy policy cooperation with West Asian countries.

    Linkage: India’s past dependence on West Asia for over 60% of crude made energy security central to its economic stability, but the share has now reduced to under 45% through diversification. The article highlights how geopolitical flashpoints and chokepoints like Hormuz expose the risks of over-reliance on West Asia. Thus, India’s emerging doctrine of energy sovereignty through five domestic pillars complements but does not replace the strategic need for balanced cooperation with West Asian suppliers.

    Mentor’s comment

    Energy defines the destiny of nations. While oil shaped the geopolitics of the 20th century, uninterrupted, affordable, and indigenous energy will decide the balance of power in the 21st. For India, a country importing over 85% of its crude and more than 50% of its natural gas,  energy dependence is not just an economic statistic but a national security liability. In an era of wars, fragile supply chains, and volatile prices, the debate is no longer about transition versus fossil fuel dependence. It is about energy sovereignty as the foundation of survival and strategic autonomy.

    Introduction

    India’s dependence on imported energy is a national vulnerability, with crude oil and natural gas alone forming nearly one-fourth of merchandise imports. While discounted Russian oil has provided temporary relief, heavy reliance on any single source magnifies strategic risks. In a fragile global environment, energy sovereignty is no longer an economic choice but a survival imperative.

    Energy Sovereignty as India’s New National Imperative

    • Import Dependence: Over 85% crude oil and 50% natural gas imports expose India’s economy to global shocks.
    • Economic Burden: Energy imports worth $170 billion (25% of total imports) destabilise the rupee and worsen the trade deficit.
    • Geopolitical Vulnerability: Russian oil now forms 35–40% of India’s imports, compared to just 2% pre-2022. Overdependence on one partner creates strategic risks.
    • Global Flashpoints: Near-conflict between Israel and Iran in June 2025 threatened 20 million barrels/day of global oil flows enough to push Brent crude above $103/barrel within days.
    • Fragile Transition: Despite global rhetoric, fossil fuels still supply 80% of primary energy; premature phase-outs, like Spain-Portugal’s 2025 blackout, prove the risks of over-reliance on intermittent renewables.

    Global Energy Shocks and the Lessons for India

    • 1973 Oil Embargo: Quadrupling of oil prices exposed Western overdependence on OPEC, prompting strategic reserves and diversified sourcing.
    • 2011 Fukushima Disaster: A nuclear meltdown stalled nuclear expansion, but the rise of coal/gas revived emissions. Nuclear energy is now regaining ground as a zero-carbon baseload.
    • 2021 Texas Freeze: Pipeline freezes and turbine failures highlighted the danger of cost-driven systems lacking resilience and weather-proofing.
    • 2022 Russia-Ukraine War: Europe’s 40% gas dependence on Russia ended abruptly, forcing record LNG prices and coal revival.
    • 2025 Iberian Blackout: Grid collapse in Spain-Portugal proved the risk of over-reliance on renewables without dispatchable backup.

    The Five Pillars of India’s Energy Sovereignty

    1. Coal Gasification for Indigenous Energy:
      • India has 150 billion tonnes of coal reserves, long sidelined due to high ash content.
      • Technologies like carbon capture and gasification can convert coal into syngas, methanol, hydrogen, and fertilizers.
      • Unlocking this potential ensures domestic supply security while reducing import dependence.
    2. Biofuels: Rural Empowerment Meets National Security:
      • Ethanol blending programme transferred over ₹92,000 crore to farmers, reduced crude imports, and saved foreign exchange.
      • With the E20 blending target, rural incomes will expand further.
      • SATAT scheme supports compressed biogas (CBG) plants, producing clean fuel and bio-manure with 20–25% organic carbon.
      • Vital for restoring soils in North India where organic carbon has dropped to 0.5% (vs healthy 2.5%).
    3. Nuclear Power for Dispatchable Zero-Carbon Future:
      • India’s nuclear capacity remains stagnant at 8.8 GW.
      • Thorium roadmap, uranium partnerships, and Small Modular Reactors (SMRs) are essential to create a baseload backbone for a renewable-heavy grid.
    4. Green Hydrogen as Strategic Technology:
      • Target: 5 million metric tonnes annually by 2030.
      • Requires domestic electrolyser manufacturing, catalysts, and storage systems.
      • The goal is not just production, but sovereign hydrogen value chains.
    5. Pumped Hydro as Grid Inertia Backbone:
      • Complements solar/wind by offering storage and grid balancing.
      • India’s topography provides vast potential for durable, scalable pumped hydro projects.

    India’s Shift Towards a Diversified Energy Strategy

    1. Reduced West Asia dependence: Crude sourcing from West Asia fell from 60% to under 45%, as per S&P Global.
    2. Diversification of partners: Russia has emerged as a key supplier, but long-term strategy aims at broad-based imports plus indigenous production.
    3. Energy Realism: India recognises transition as a pathway, not a switch. Security and resilience are prerequisites to climate ambition.

    Conclusion

    The 20th century was dominated by oil politics; the 21st will be shaped by energy sovereignty. India’s vulnerability due to high imports, volatile supply chains, and geopolitical risks makes domestic capacity building non-negotiable. Coal gasification, biofuels, nuclear, green hydrogen, and pumped hydro form the sovereign spine of a resilient energy future. The Israel-Iran ceasefire is a reminder: India must act during stability, not after a crisis. Energy sovereignty is no longer a policy choice, it is the foundation of survival, resilience, and strategic autonomy.

  • ClassGPT: How AI is reshaping campuses

    Introduction

    Artificial Intelligence (AI), particularly generative models like ChatGPT and Gemini, has become both a boon and a challenge in higher education. Students increasingly rely on AI for assignments, summaries, coding, and even emails, while faculty members grapple with maintaining originality, academic honesty, and critical thinking. With AI growing faster than existing regulatory or pedagogical frameworks, Indian institutions are experimenting with varied approaches, ranging from outright bans to integration into curricula. The choices made today will determine not just the future of learning but also India’s knowledge economy and workforce readiness.

    The Changing Landscape of Education with AI

    How widespread is AI usage among students and teachers

    1. IIT Delhi Survey (2024): Four out of five students admitted to using AI, often several times a week. One in ten subscribed to premium versions.
    2. Faculty usage: 77% of surveyed teachers used AI for summarising papers, creating slides, or drafting communication.
    3. Student motivations: Simplification of concepts, summarisation of material, mind maps, and scenario simulations.
    4. Concerns: Errors in math, flawed debugging, weak context handling.

    The integrity dilemma in classrooms

    1. Blurred lines: Students question whether using AI counts as “cheating” or “time-saving.”
    2. Academic honesty: IIT Delhi’s committee recommended rewriting plagiarism policies to require disclosure of AI use.
    3. Critical thinking loss: Faculty fear students may accept AI answers as “Truth” without questioning them.

    Institutional responses in India

    • Policy innovations:
      1. IIT Delhi – integration of AI/ML in curricula, AI workshops, campus-wide licenses.
      2. IIIT Delhi – shifted evaluation to 90% exams, 10% assignments.
      3. IIM Ranchi – evaluation rubric for responsible AI integration.
      4. Shiv Nadar University – five-level “Gen AI Assessment Scale” from prohibition to responsible autonomy.
      5. Ashoka University – AI literacy courses, foundation modules, ethics of AI curriculum.
      6. Strict resistance: Some universities (Delhi University’s Dept. of Education) enforce “No AI” policies, insisting on handwritten assignments.
    • Pedagogical experiments with AI
      1. Classroom integration: AI tools are increasingly used to automate routine tasks like code generation, freeing classroom time for higher-order problem-solving.
      2. Assessment innovation: Institutions are shifting towards interactive methods such as AI-assisted viva voce, project-based evaluation, and scenario testing to ensure genuine understanding.
      3. Ethics in curriculum: Courses on “Ethics of AI” and AI literacy modules are being introduced to sensitise students towards responsible and transparent usage.
      4. Balanced usage: AI is deployed after core concepts are taught, ensuring students retain critical thinking and do not outsource judgment entirely.

    Global responses and comparative perspectives

    1. USA: Princeton provides ChatGPT licenses; Oxford mandates disclosure but allows professors to decide; assignments redesigned to integrate AI.
    2. Australia: TEQSA guidelines legitimise AI but require mandatory disclosure; oral exams and viva voce are making a comeback.
    3. UK: Universities pilot TeacherMatic to ensure sector-wide learning models.

    Conclusion

    Generative AI has irreversibly entered the Indian classroom. The challenge is not whether to allow or ban it but how to regulate, integrate, and ethically harness it. From IITs’ committees to global universities’ adaptive models, the world is learning that AI can either weaken critical thinking or be a catalyst for higher-order learning. For India, the stakes are especially high: with its demographic dividend and growing tech economy, how students learn today will define the nation’s competitiveness tomorrow.

    Value Addition

    Real-Time Usage of AI in Education

    1. Adaptive Learning Platforms : AI customises lesson plans, adjusting pace and difficulty based on student performance, ensuring personalised learning outcomes.
    2. Automated Assessment and Feedback : AI evaluates tests, essays, coding tasks, and provides instant feedback, saving teacher time and helping students improve faster.
    3. Language Translation and Accessibility : Real-time translation, speech-to-text, and text-to-speech tools remove linguistic barriers, supporting multilingual and differently-abled learners.
    4. AI-Powered Virtual Tutors : Chatbots and digital assistants are available 24×7 to clarify doubts, simulate problem-solving, and provide personalised tutoring.
    5. Plagiarism and Academic Integrity Checks : AI tools detect plagiarism and even AI-generated content, ensuring transparency and originality in student submissions.
    6. Immersive Learning with AI + AR/VR : Virtual labs and simulations powered by AI allow safe, hands-on learning in science, medicine, and engineering.
    7. Administrative Automation : AI automates attendance, timetabling, grading records, and performance monitoring, reducing non-teaching workload for faculty.
    8. Industry 4.0 Skill Development : AI-based coding assistants, real-time debugging, and project simulators prepare students for jobs in data science, robotics, and emerging tech.

    PYQ Relevance

    [UPSC 2023]  Introduce the concept of Artificial Intelligence (AI). How does AI help clinical diagnosis? Do you perceive any threat to privacy of the individual in the use of AI in the healthcare?

    Linkage: AI’s growing role in education parallels its use in healthcare, where it aids efficiency but raises ethical and privacy concerns. Just as AI in clinical diagnosis demands accuracy, transparency, and accountability, AI in classrooms requires disclosure, integrity, and critical oversight. Both contexts highlight the larger governance challenge of balancing innovation with responsibility.

  • [pib] State Energy Efficiency Index, 2024

    Why in the News?

    The Bureau of Energy Efficiency (BEE) has released the latest edition of State Energy Efficiency Index 2024 (SEEI 2024).

    About State Energy Efficiency Index (SEEI), 2024:

    • Released by: Bureau of Energy Efficiency (BEE), Ministry of Power, in association with Alliance for an Energy Efficient Economy (AEEE).
    • Coverage: Assesses 36 States/UTs on energy efficiency performance for FY 2023–24.
    • Framework:
      • 6th edition, implementation-focused.
      • 66 indicators across sectors – Buildings, Industry, Municipal Services, Transport, Agriculture, DISCOMs, Cross-sector.
      • Includes new focus areas: EV adoption, star-rated buildings, Demand Side Management (DSM).
    • Classification:
      • Front Runners (>60%), Achievers (50–60%), Contenders (30–50%), Aspirants (<30%).
      • Top performers: Maharashtra (>15 MToE), Andhra Pradesh (5–15 MToE), Assam (1–5 MToE), Tripura (<1 MToE).
    • Key Highlights:
      • 24 states notified Energy Conservation Building Code (ECBC 2017).
      • 31 states adopted EV policies.
      • 13 states promoted solar pumps (Kerala – 74% adoption).
      • All 36 prepared State Energy Efficiency Action Plans (SEEAPs); 31 formed State Energy Transition Committees.
    • Significance: Supports India’s Net Zero 2070 goal by promoting state-level energy transition.

    Back2Basics: Bureau of Energy Efficiency (BEE):

    • Established: 1 March 2002, under the Energy Conservation Act, 2001.
    • Nodal Ministry: Ministry of Power.
    • Mission: To assist in developing policies & strategies for energy efficiency, with the aim of reducing energy intensity of the Indian economy.
    • Functions:
      • Regulatory: Implementation of Energy Conservation Act provisions.
      • Promotional:  Encourage adoption of efficient technologies & practices.
    • Key Achievements:
      • Contributed to 3.5% reduction in India’s overall energy consumption.
      • Implements programmes like Perform, Achieve, Trade (PAT), Standards & Labelling, Energy Efficiency Financing Platform, etc.
    [UPSC 2016] On which of the following can you find the Bureau of Energy Efficiency Star Label?

    1. Ceiling fans 2. Electric geysers 3. Tubular fluorescent lamps

    Select the correct answer using the code given below.

    Options: (a) 1 and 2 only (b) 3 only (c) 2 and 3 only (d) 1, 2 and 3*

     

  • Ice Age-era Dragon Fly rediscovered

    Why in the News?

    Odonatologists have reconfirmed the presence of the elusive dragonfly species Crocothemis erythraea in the southern Western Ghats.

    About Crocothemis erythraea Dragonfly:

    • Species Type: A rare dragonfly species, usually found in Europe, Asia, and the Himalayas.
    • Recent Finding: Reconfirmed in the Western Ghats, specifically in Kerala and Tamil Nadu high ranges.
    • Comparison: Closely resembles the common lowland species Crocothemis servilia, leading to earlier misidentifications.
    • Habitat Preference: Inhabits cooler, high-altitude areas above 550 metres.
    • Historical Origin: Likely spread to South India during the Ice Age and survived in montane habitats such as Sholas and grasslands.

    Significance of the Discovery:

    • Biodiversity Insight: Demonstrates how ancient climate changes influenced current biodiversity patterns.
    • Ecological Importance: Reinforces the Western Ghats’ status as a biodiversity hotspot of global value.
    • Conservation Message: Highlights the need to protect sensitive high-altitude habitats like Sholas and montane grasslands.
    • Scientific Contribution: Adds to India’s growing record of documenting and conserving rare species.
    [UPSC 2024] The organisms Cicada, Froghopper and Pond skater are:

    Options: (a) Birds (b) Fish (c) Insects* (d) Reptiles

     

  • Challenges of Monsoon Variability and Disaster Preparedness

    Introduction

    Heavy rains in August 2025 have wreaked havoc across North India, Himachal Pradesh cut off, Jammu and Kashmir reporting over 40 deaths, Punjab’s farmland submerged, and the Yamuna swelling in the capital. The floods highlight the increasing unpredictability of the southwest monsoon, where rainfall comes in concentrated bursts rather than spread across weeks. Beyond the immediate tragedy, this points to systemic governance challenges, unplanned infrastructure in fragile zones, inadequate early warning systems, and a reactive rather than preventive disaster management model.

    Increasing unpredictability of the monsoon

    1. Erraticism of rainfall: Concentrated bursts replace evenly spread rains, overwhelming slopes, rivers, and cities.
    2. Amplified erosion: Short, intense rain accelerates slope destabilisation in Himalayas.
    3. Recurring phenomenon: Evidence now suggests such rainfall patterns are no longer exceptional but likely regular.

    Fragility of Himalayan ecosystems and their weakening

    1. Deforestation and clearance: Forest cover removal and road-widening continue unchecked.
    2. Slope destabilisation: Lack of slope-safe engineering increases landslide risks.
    3. Shrinking catchments: Reduced buffering capacity heightens chances of slope failure and siltation downstream.

    Insufficiency in disaster preparedness

    1. Early warning gaps: Despite better forecasts, reliable ground-level alerts are absent.
    2. Relief over resilience: Agencies mobilise post-damage; pre-positioned supplies and community drills are missing.
    3. Reactive model: Each disaster treated as unforeseeable, ignoring repeated expert warnings.

    Policy choices aggravating vulnerabilities

    1. Strategic projects: Roads and urban expansion pursued in unstable landscapes.
    2. Poor compensatory afforestation: Quality of replanted forests does not match original ecological value.
    3. Climate-resilient infrastructure lag: Development focus prioritises speed over sustainability.

    Shifts required in disaster governance

    1. Shift to preventive strategies: Focus on reducing vulnerabilities before disasters occur.
    2. Systematic preparedness: Regular drills, community participation, and pre-emptive relief stocks.
    3. Balanced growth: Infrastructure that respects ecological fragility and integrates climate resilience.

    Conclusion

    The 2025 floods across North India are not isolated accidents but part of a pattern of climate-driven extreme weather. Treating each calamity as “unprecedented” delays learning and perpetuates cycles of loss. Building resilience means moving beyond post-disaster relief to preventive strategies: sustainable infrastructure, landslide mitigation, community drills, and early-warning systems. Unless governance shifts from reaction to anticipation, monsoon seasons will continue to leave trails of destruction.

    PYQ Relevance

    [UPSC 2019] Disaster preparedness is the first step in any disaster management process. Explain how hazard zonation mapping will help disaster mitigation in the case of landslides.

    Linkage: The 2025 North India floods highlight how slope destabilisation and unchecked construction in Himalayan States amplify landslide risks. Hazard zonation mapping could have guided slope-safe engineering, restricted high-risk land use, and improved early warning. Thus, it directly connects preparedness to mitigation, aligning with the UPSC 2019 question.

  • United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED)

    Why in the News?

    This year marks three decades since the landmark Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro in 1992, which established the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC).

    About United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED):

    • Event: Also called the Earth Summit, held in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil (June 3–14, 1992).
    • Participation: 178 countries, 117 heads of state, thousands of NGOs and civil society groups.
    • Objective: Reconcile economic growth with environmental protection, mainstreaming sustainable development globally.
    • Key Outcomes:
      • Rio Declaration (27 principles, including precautionary principle & Common but Differentiated Responsibilities (CBDR)).
      • Agenda 21 (non-binding action plan for sustainable development).
      • UNFCCC (binding treaty on climate change; later Kyoto Protocol, Paris Agreement).
      • Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) (binding treaty on biodiversity).
      • Statement of Forest Principles (non-binding guidelines for sustainable forests).
      • Commission on Sustainable Development (CSD) created to monitor implementation.
    • Significance: Landmark in international environmental diplomacy, embedding sustainability in global policy and leading to follow-ups (Rio+10, Rio+20).

    India and UNCED:

    • Stance & Advocacy:
      • Strongly pushed for Common but Differentiated Responsibilities (CBDR); developed nations must bear greater responsibility due to historical emissions and resource use.
      • Emphasized poverty eradication and the right to economic growth for developing countries.
      • Called for financial support and technology transfer from developed countries to the Global South.
    • Commitments:
      • Signed & ratified all key Rio agreements: Rio Declaration, Agenda 21, UNFCCC, CBD.
    • Domestic Follow-up:
      • Integrated Agenda 21 principles into national policies (sustainable resource use, biodiversity protection, EIAs).
      • Strengthened environmental legislation under the Environment Protection Act (1986).
    • Role: Positioned itself as a voice of developing countries, balancing environment with development imperatives.
    [UPSC 2010] The United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) is an international treaty drawn at-

    Options:

    (a) United Conference on the Human Environment, Stockholm, 1972

    (b) UN Conference on Environment and Development, Rio De Janerio, 1992 *

    (c) World Summit on Sustainable Development, Johannesburg, 2002

    (d) UN Climate Change Conference, Copenhagen, 2009

     

  • Kulasekarapattinam Launch Complex

    Why in the News?

    ISRO Chairman V. Narayanan announced that the upcoming rocket launching site at Kulasekarapattinam (Tamil Nadu) will handle 20–25 satellite launches annually.

    Kulasekarapattinam Launch Complex

    About Kulasekarapattinam Spaceport:

    • Location: Coastal hamlet near Tiruchendur, Thoothukudi district, Tamil Nadu; inaugurated by PM in February 2024.
    • Second Spaceport: India’s second spaceport after Satish Dhawan Space Centre (Sriharikota, Andhra Pradesh, 1971).
    • Capacity: Can handle 20–25 launches annually, including 24 launches using a Mobile Launch Structure.
    • Focus: Dedicated to Small Satellite Launch Vehicles (SSLVs), with capacity to launch rockets up to 500 kg.
    • Facilities: About 35 facilities including launch pad, rocket integration units, ground range, checkout systems, and Mobile Launch Structure with onboard checkout computers.

    Advantages offered by Kulasekarapattinam Spaceport:

    • Direct Southward Launches: Location allows launches into the Indian Ocean without crossing landmasses; ensures more safety from debris fall.
    • No Dogleg Manoeuvre: Unlike Sriharikota, no detour is needed to avoid Sri Lanka, saving fuel.
    • Efficient Trajectory: Improves efficiency for satellites in Sun-Synchronous Polar Orbits (SSPOs).
    • Payload Advantage: SSLVs from Kulasekarapattinam can place ~300 kg into SSPO, higher than from Sriharikota.
    • Decongestion: Reduces pressure on Sriharikota, which will focus on larger PSLV, GSLV, and Gaganyaan launches.
    • Commercial Boost: Strengthens India’s role in the global small-satellite launch market, enhancing space economy.
    • Strategic Advantage: Near-equator position provides benefits for certain orbital paths.
    [UPSC 2008] ISRO successfully conducted a rocket test using cryogenic engines in the year 2007. Where is the test-stand used for the purpose, located?

    Options: (a) Balasore (b) Thiruvananthapuram (c) Mahendragiri* (d) Karwar

     

  • With Sci-Hub gone, will the ‘One Nation, One Subscription’ scheme step up?

    Introduction

    The blocking of Sci-Hub in India marks a turning point in the battle between corporate publishers and the principle of open knowledge. At the heart of the issue lies the paradox of publicly funded research locked behind exorbitant paywalls. The government’s One Nation One Subscription (ONOS) scheme, with an allocation of ₹6,000 crore, aims to democratize access to 13,000 journals for research institutions. Yet, concerns remain about its cost-effectiveness, inclusivity, and long-term sustainability.

    Why is this issue in the news?

    • The Delhi High Court’s verdict against Sci-Hub is a landmark moment because:
    • For the first time in India, the judiciary has formally sided with publishers in the long-drawn copyright battle.
    • It stands in sharp contrast with the reality that research is funded by public money but monetized by private publishers with 30%+ profit margins.
    • The problem is enormous: lakhs of rupees per journal subscription make access unaffordable for many institutions, forcing dependence on Sci-Hub earlier.
    • The government’s ONOS initiative is the first large-scale attempt to address structural inequities in knowledge access, but doubts persist about its ability to replace shadow libraries.

    The Distinctive Nature of Scientific Publishing

    1. No royalties for authors: Researchers and peer reviewers are unpaid, unlike musicians or filmmakers.
    2. Publicly funded research: Much of Indian science is taxpayer-funded, yet access is privatized.
    3. Exorbitant subscriptions: Institutions pay lakhs for a single journal. Publishers justify costs via “quality control” but enjoy 30%+ profit margins, raising concerns of rent-seeking.

    The Global Controversy Around Sci-Hub

    1. Copyright infringement: Courts in the U.S., Europe, and now India have ruled against Sci-Hub.
    2. Essential access tool: For countless researchers, Sci-Hub was the only means to access knowledge, especially outside elite universities.
    3. Contempt charges: Alexandra Elbakyan allegedly violated court orders by running Sci-Net, a mirror service.
    4. Declining relevance: Technical unreliability and growing open-access alternatives are reducing its utility.

    The Vision of One Nation, One Subscription

    1. Government-led subscription: Outlay of ₹6,000 crore (2023–2026) for bulk access to 13,000 journals.
    2. Phase I focus: All public institutions; Phase II may include private ones.
    3. Equal access: Seeks to eliminate inequities between elite and smaller research centres.
    4. Limitations: Independent researchers and those at private centres remain excluded until Phase II.

    ONOS in the Context of Global Open-Access Movements

    1. Global open-access movement: Over half of papers are already open access through preprints and repositories.
    2. U.S. policy (2026): All federally funded research must be open.
    3. EU Horizon Europe: Similar open-access mandate.
    4. India’s challenge: At a time when the world moves toward open access, ONOS risks becoming an expensive detour.

    Structural Flaws in Scholarly Publishing

    1. Dependence on foreign publishers: ONOS continues India’s reliance on Western journals.
    2. Copyright transfer: Indian researchers must still give away rights to their work.
    3. Pay-to-publish dilemma: Funds freed at institutions may shift to open-access journals, but may ignore institutional repositories.
    4. Need for rights retention: Policies like Harvard/MIT (mandatory deposit in repositories) could empower Indian researchers.

    Conclusion

    The Sci-Hub ban highlights the persistent inequities in access to scientific knowledge. While ONOS is a step forward, it risks being a band-aid solution unless paired with deeper reforms: indigenous publishing capacity, national repositories, and copyright retention policies. India must not merely manage the symptoms of an exploitative system but must cure the disease by reclaiming knowledge as a public good.

    Value Addition

    Knowledge as a Public Good

    • Publicly funded research must be accessible to all because it is financed by taxpayers.
    • Blocking access (through high subscription fees or court orders) creates an elitist knowledge economy.
    • UN and UNESCO treat knowledge access as a pillar of Sustainable Development Goals (SDG 4: Quality Education, SDG 9: Innovation).

    Economic Dimension

    • Global publishers enjoy 30%+ profit margins, while Indian institutions pay lakhs per journal subscription, draining public funds.
    • ONOS at ₹6,000 crore (2023–2026) represents bulk negotiation power by the state, saving scattered institutional expenditure.
    • Issue of dependency on foreign publishers persists, highlighting the need for indigenous publishing ecosystems.

    Global Comparisons

    • U.S. (2026 mandate): All federally funded research must be openly accessible.
    • EU’s Horizon Europe: Immediate open access to publications funded under the programme.
    • Plan S (Europe, 2018): Publicly funded research must be published in open-access journals.
    • India risks being out of sync if it over-invests in subscriptions while others move to free access models.

    Technology and Governance

    • ONOS = India’s experiment in e-governance for knowledge.
    • Needs to integrate institutional repositories, preprint servers, and rights retention policies (like Harvard/MIT) to empower researchers.
    • Can be linked with the Digital India mission, showing tech-driven democratization of services.

    Ethical Dimension

    • Applied Ethics of Technology: Corporate profits vs. collective social welfare.
    • Moral dilemma: Should intellectual property rights override public access to life-saving or path-breaking research?
    • Covid-19 demonstrated that open-access collaboration saved lives by accelerating vaccine and drug development.

    PYQ Relevance

    [UPSC 2024] ‘’What is the present world scenario of Intellectual Property Rights? Although India is second in the world to file patents, still only a few have been commercialized. Explain the reasons behind this less commercialization.”

    Linkage: The Sci-Hub ban and ONOS scheme reflect how IPR in scientific publishing creates barriers to access despite research being publicly funded. Globally, publishers extract high profits through restrictive copyright, mirroring the broader challenge of IPR becoming a tool of rent-seeking rather than innovation. India’s weak indigenous publishing ecosystem and overdependence on foreign journals parallel the problem of low commercialization of patents—both highlight the gap between innovation output and practical accessibility/utility.