💥Mains Ready By December. Smash Mains & Smash PYQ Admissions Open
Talk to Mentor

Civilsdaily

Login

GS Paper: GS3

  • What is Free Movement Regime (FMR)?

    Why in the News?

    Ahead of PM Modi’s Manipur visit, United Naga Council (UNC) has announced a trade embargo from against the India–Myanmar border fence and the suspension of the Free Movement Regime (FMR).

    What is Free Movement Regime (FMR)?

    About the Free Movement Regime (FMR):

    • Overview: Introduced in the 1970s, FMR allowed residents within 16 km of the India–Myanmar border to travel freely up to 16 km across without visa requirements.
    • Border length: India–Myanmar border stretches 1,643 km across four states: Arunachal Pradesh (520 km), Nagaland (215 km), Manipur (398 km), Mizoram (510 km).
    • Purpose: To recognize ethnic, cultural, and familial ties of communities (Kuki, Naga, Mizo, etc.) living across the unfenced border.
    • Revision: Last revised in 2016 under the Act East Policy.
    • Suspension: On February 8, 2024, MHA formally announced its scrapping, citing:
      • Internal security risks.
      • Illegal immigration and demographic changes in NE states.
      • Cross-border drug trafficking and insurgency links.

    Stakeholder Perspectives:

    • Kuki groups: View FMR suspension and fencing as an attack on shared ethnic ties, even comparing it to the Berlin Wall. Recently reached an understanding with MHA negotiators.
    • Naga groups (UNC): Strongly opposed to border fencing and FMR suspension, claiming it undermines homeland, land rights, and identity. Announced a trade embargo in protest.
    • Meiteis (Valley population): Support suspension, arguing that FMR facilitated illegal migration, illicit drug trade, and aggravated ethnic tensions.
    • Government of India: Defends suspension on security and demographic grounds, while attempting to balance peace talks with tribal groups.
    [UPSC 2016] Consider the following statements:

    I. Assam shares a border with Bhutan and Bangladesh

    II. West Bengal shares a border with Bhutan and Nepal

    III. Mizoram shares a border with Bangladesh and Myanmar

    Which of the statements given above are correct?

    Options: (a) I, II and III * (b) I and II only (c) II and III only (d) I and III only

     

  • Immigration and Foreigners (Exemption) Order, 2025

    Why in the News?

    The Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) has issued the Immigration and Foreigners (Exemption) Order, 2025, notified under Section 33 of the Immigration and Foreigners Act, 2025.

    What is Immigration and Foreigners Act, 2025?

    • Enactment: Passed by Parliament, effective 1 Sept 2025.
    • Objective: Unifies scattered immigration laws into a single framework, balancing national security, demographic protection, humanitarian obligations, and economic openness.
    • Repeals: Passport (Entry into India) Act, 1920; Registration of Foreigners Act, 1939; Foreigners Act, 1946; Immigration (Carriers’ Liability) Act, 2000.
    • Key Provisions:
      • All foreigners must enter, stay, exit with valid passport & visa, unless exempted.
      • Digital system with biometrics, AI-based monitoring, and real-time agency coordination.
      • New visa categories: Skilled Talent, Startup, Investor, Digital Nomad, Business Plus.
      • Mandatory reporting by hotels, landlords, universities, hospitals on foreign guests/students/patients.
      • Entry to protected/restricted areas subject to special permits; mountaineering expeditions need prior approval.
    • Penalties: Up to 7 years imprisonment and ₹10 lakh fine for forged documents; detention centres allowed for illegal foreigners till deportation.
    • Institutions:
      • National Immigration Authority for policy and central database.
      • Bureau of Immigration, led by Commissioner, for operations.

    About Immigration and Foreigners (Exemption) Order, 2025:

    • Overview: Issued by Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) on 1 Sept 2025 under Section 33 of the Immigration and Foreigners Act, 2025.
    • Objective: Consolidates earlier scattered exemptions to simplify rules, enable regional mobility with Nepal & Bhutan, extend humanitarian relief to refugees/persecuted minorities, and provide legal clarity to carriers.
    • Replaces: The Registration of Foreigners (Exemption) Order, 1957 and Immigration (Carriers’ Liability) Order, 2007.
    • Exemptions:
      • Indian Armed Forces members on duty and families using govt transport.
      • Indian citizens entering via Nepal/Bhutan borders.
      • Nepal & Bhutan citizens (except if entering from China, Hong Kong, Macau, Pakistan).
      • Tibetans registered with India, religious minorities from Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Pakistan (who entered before Dec 31, 2024), and Sri Lankan Tamils sheltered till Jan 9, 2015.
      • Diplomats, visa-on-arrival nationals, foreign military personnel on goodwill or exercises.
    • Carriers’ Liability: Rail, road, air, sea operators exempted where forged documents need expert verification or ships/aircraft are diverted.
    [UPSC 2021] With reference to India, consider the following statements:

    1.There is only one citizenship and one domicile.

    2.A citizen by birth only can become the Head of State.

    3.A foreigner, once granted citizenship, cannot be deprived of it under any circumstances.

    Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

    Options: (a) 1 only* (b) 2 only (c) 1 and 3 (d) 2 and 3

     

  • India’s recent maritime reforms need course correction

    Introduction

    India’s maritime laws, some over a century old, were recently overhauled through the Ports Bill, Merchant Shipping Act, Coastal Shipping Act, and Carriage of Goods by Sea Bill (2025). The reforms aim to modernise governance, boost ease of doing business, and enhance India’s maritime role. Yet, concerns remain over centralisation, weakened ownership safeguards, excessive discretion, and burdens on smaller players, raising questions about federal balance.

    Why Is This News Significant

    The Ports Bill, 2025 centralises decision-making under a Maritime State Development Council, curbing State autonomy in port development. The Merchant Shipping Act allows partial foreign ownership of Indian-flagged vessels, ending the earlier full Indian ownership rule. Critics argue these changes favour big corporations and the Centre, while sidelining coastal States and small operators, with implications for India’s maritime sovereignty.

    Progress and Pitfalls of Maritime Modernisation

    1. Comprehensive reform: New laws collectively update fragmented, outdated frameworks, covering shipping finance, offshore operations, safety, liability, and training.
    2. Ease of business: The Ports Act aims to create coherence in regulation, promoting sustainable development and investment.
    3. Legislative haste: Bills passed without serious debate or standing committee review, raising concerns about lack of consensus and scrutiny.

    The Ports Act and the Federal Balance

    1. Centralisation of authority: Maritime State Development Council empowers the Centre to dictate State maritime policies.
    2. Erosion of fiscal autonomy: Coastal States cannot adjust frameworks independently; central plans like Sagarmala and Gati Shakti override local priorities.
    3. Federal subordination: Critics argue this undermines cooperative federalism, reducing States to implementers of central schemes.

    Eroding Safeguards in Shipping Ownership

    1. Loophole in Indian-flag ownership: Merchant Shipping Act allows partial foreign/OCI ownership; exact thresholds left to government discretion.
    2. Risk of flag-of-convenience: Executive may dilute ownership norms, letting foreign operators control Indian ships indefinitely.
    3. BBCD mechanism: Bareboat Charter-Cum-Demise leasing recognised, but risks foreign lessors retaining de facto control.

    Small Operators and Dispute Resolution Challenges

    1. Vague compliance norms: Discretionary powers could overwhelm smaller port operators with compliance burdens.
    2. Clause 17 controversy: Bars civil courts from port-related disputes; relies on internal committees lacking impartiality.
    3. Investment deterrence: Absence of independent judicial oversight could erode investor confidence.

    Coastal Shipping: Protecting or Undermining Local Players?

    1. Cabotage protection: Only Indian-flagged vessels can engage in coastal trade — in principle, safeguarding domestic players.
    2. DG Shipping’s sweeping powers: Licences to foreign vessels on broad grounds like “national security” or “strategic alignment.”
    3. Impact on fishing industry: Smaller players face heavy reporting burdens without clarity on data use or safeguards.
    4. Central dominance: National Coastal and Inland Shipping Strategic Plan reduces State-level say in coastal regulation.

    Conclusion

    India’s maritime reforms are necessary but flawed. The package risks over-centralisation, weakened sovereignty, and burdens on smaller operators, even as it promises modernisation. True reform requires transparent ownership rules, impartial dispute resolution, and genuine cooperative federalism. Otherwise, the reforms may deliver short-term ease of business but compromise India’s federal balance and maritime security.

    Value Addition

    Key Provisions of the Indian Ports Bill, 2025 (replacing Indian Ports Act, 1908)

    1. State Maritime Boards:
      • Statutory recognition: Boards set up by coastal States now have a legal mandate.
      • Functions: Planning & developing port infrastructure, granting licenses, fixing tariffs, ensuring compliance with safety, security, and environmental norms.
    2. Maritime State Development Council (MSDC):
      • Composition: Chaired by Union Minister of Ports, Shipping and Waterways; includes State Ministers, Navy & Coast Guard representatives, and Union Ministry officials.
      • Role: Issues guidelines on port data, ensures tariff transparency, advises Centre on national maritime plans, legislative adequacy, and connectivity.
    3. Dispute Resolution Committee (DRC):
      • Jurisdiction: Resolves disputes between non-major ports, concessionaires, users, and service providers.
      • Appeals: Lie with High Courts; civil courts barred.
      • Flexibility: Agreements may allow arbitration or alternative dispute resolution.
    4. Tariffs:
      • Major Ports: Fixed by Board of Major Port Authority/Company Board.
      • Non-Major Ports: Fixed by State Maritime Boards or their concessionaires.
    5. Port Officers:
      • Conservator: Chief port officer with powers over anchoring, berthing, movement, obstruction clearance, and fee recovery.
      • New functions: Preventing disease spread, assessing damage, adjudicating penalties.
    6. Safety and Environmental Protection:
      • MARPOL & Ballast Water Management Convention compliance mandatory.
      • New obligations: Waste reception facilities, emergency preparedness, pollution containment, and regular central audits.
    7. Offences and Penalties:
      • Continuity: Retains offences under 1908 Act (non-compliance, impeding navigation, damage to port property).
      • Decriminalisation: Certain offences now carry monetary fines; first-time violations can be compounded.
    8. New offences:
      • Imprisonment up to 6 months for endangering vessel safety, disturbing seabed.
      • Monetary penalties for unnotified port operations, failure to report/manage pollution, or ignoring DRC orders.

    PYQ Relevance:

    [UPSC 2022] What are the maritime security challenges in India? Discuss the organisational, technical and procedural initiatives taken to improve maritime security.

    Linkage: India’s maritime reforms (2025) strengthen security through MARPOL compliance, waste management, and statutory State Maritime Boards, but also create vulnerabilities. Dilution of vessel ownership, centralisation via MSDC, and weak dispute resolution raise concerns of sovereignty and resilience. Thus, reforms reflect both organisational advances and new security risks, linking directly to India’s maritime security challenges.

  • GST Council approves two-rate tax slab effective September 22

    Why in the News?

    In its 56th meeting, the Goods and Services Tax (GST) Council approved a two-rate structure with special category rates, effective 22 September 2025.

    What is GST?

    • Overview: A comprehensive, multi-stage, destination-based indirect tax on goods and services.
    • Launch: Introduced 1 July 2017 via 101st Constitutional Amendment Act, 2016.
    • Objective: “One Nation, One Tax” to reduce cascading taxes, simplify compliance, and expand base.
    • Earlier Structure: Five slabs initially (0, 5, 12, 18, 28%) plus cess on luxury/sin goods.
    • Exemptions: Essential items like food grains, medicines, education; petroleum, alcohol, electricity remain outside GST.

    About GST Council:

    • Constitutional Basis: Created under Article 279A (inserted by the Constitution (One Hundred and First Amendment) Act, 2016).
    • Composition: Chaired by Union Finance Minister, with MoS Finance and all state finance/taxation ministers.
    • Voting: Centre – one-third weight, States – two-thirds; requires 75% weighted votes for decisions.
    • Meetings: Held quarterly; over 55 meetings so far.
    • Role: Decides on rates, exemptions, compliance, and dispute resolution, making it a key fiscal federal institution.

    GST Council approves two-rate tax slab effective September 22

    New GST Rate Structure:

    • Simplification: At the 56th GST Council meeting (Sept 2025), slabs reduced to two rates plus a special rate.
    • Main Slabs: 5% and 18% apply on most goods and services.
    • Special 40% Rate: Levied on sin goods (tobacco, pan masala, aerated drinks) and super-luxury items (large cars, yachts, private aircraft).
    • Rate Reductions:
      • Daily-use items (soap, shampoo, toothpaste, bicycles, kitchenware) now at 5%.
      • Cement down from 28% to 18%.
      • Small cars, motorcycles <350cc, ACs, TVs, dishwashers shifted to 18%.
      • Food staples (milk, paneer, rotis, chapatis, parathas) at 0%.
      • Life-saving drugs, spectacles corrected to 0–5%.
    • Inverted Duty Fix: Man-made fibre, yarn, fertilizers, acids, ammonia cut to 5%.
    • Revenue Impact: Estimated loss of ₹48,000 crore, expected to be offset by higher compliance and buoyancy.
    [UPSC 2017] What is/are the most likely advantages of implementing ‘Goods and Services Tax (GST)’?

    1. It will replace multiple taxes collected by multiple authorities and will thus create a single market in India.

    2. It will drastically reduce the ‘Current Account Deficit’ of India and will enable it to increase its foreign exchange reserves.

    3. It will enormously increase the growth and size of the economy of India and will enable it to overtake China in the near future.

    Select the correct answer using the code given below:

    Options: (a) 1 only * (b) 2 and 3 only (c) 1 and 3 only (d) 1, 2 and 3

     

  • [pib] Coconut Development Board (CDB)

    Why in the News?

    The World Coconut Day (2nd September) was recently celebrated by the Coconut Development Board (CDB).

    About Coconut Development Board (CDB):

    • Establishment: Created on 12 January 1981; statutory body under the Ministry of Agriculture & Farmers Welfare.
    • Headquarters & Offices: HQ at Kochi, Kerala; regional offices in Bengaluru, Chennai, Guwahati, and Patna.
    • Mandate: Integrated development of coconut production and utilization with focus on productivity, processing, and product diversification.
    • Functions: Provides technical advice and financial aid to farmers/processors; promotes modern technology adoption, value addition, pricing & marketing measures, and export promotion.
    • Welfare Schemes: Implements farmer-focused programs like Coconut Palm Insurance Mission and Kera Suraksha.

    Back2Basics: Coconut Cultivation in India

    • Global Standing: India is the third-largest coconut producer, contributing about 31.45% of world output.
    • Production: In 2023–24, India produced 153.29 lakh MT from an area of 23.33 lakh ha.
    • Productivity: Average productivity at 9,871 nuts/ha, among the highest globally.
    • Leading States: Kerala, Tamil Nadu, Karnataka, and Andhra Pradesh account for ~90% of production. Kerala and TN lead, Karnataka has risen sharply, AP contributes ~8%.
    • Economic Value: Sector contributed ₹27,199.5 crore GVO and ₹30,795.6 crore GDP share in 2022–23.
    • Exports: In 2022–23, India exported coconut products worth ₹3,554.23 crore (US $452 million) including copra, oil, coir, activated carbon, and value-added foods.
    • Employment Impact: Supports 12+ million livelihoods; 15,000+ coir industries employ nearly 6 lakh workers.

     

    [UPSC 2022] With reference to the “Tea Board” in India, consider the following statements:

    1. The Tea Board is a statutory body.

    2. It is a regulatory body attached to the Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare.

    3. The Tea Board’s Head Office is situated in Bengaluru.

    4. The Board has overseas offices at Dubai and Moscow.

    Which of the statements given above are correct ?

    Options: (a) 1 and 3 (b) 2 and 4 (c) 3 and 4 (d) 1 and 4*

     

  • Biodiversity Beyond National Jurisdictions (BBNJ) Agreement

    Why in the News?

    The Ministry of Earth Sciences has formed a 12-member committee led by SC lawyer Sanjay Upadhyay to draft a new national law safeguarding India’s maritime and economic interests under the 2023 High Seas Treaty (BBNJ Agreement).

    About the BBNJ (High Seas Treaty) Agreement:

    • Overview: International treaty under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), focusing on biodiversity beyond national jurisdiction (high seas).
    • Objective: Conservation and sustainable use of marine biodiversity in international waters (covering ~64% of the world’s oceans).
    • Scope of Provisions:
      • Establishment of Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) in high seas.
      • Regulation of seabed mining and extractive activities.
      • Fair and equitable sharing of benefits from marine genetic resources.
      • Mandatory environmental impact assessments (EIAs) before major projects.
      • Use of both scientific and traditional knowledge, guided by the precautionary principle.
    • Relation to UNCLOS: Would be the third implementing agreement, alongside:
      • 1994 Part XI Implementation Agreement (seabed mineral resources).
      • 1995 UN Fish Stocks Agreement (conservation of migratory fish stocks).
    • Adoption & Status:
      • Agreed in March 2023, open for signature for 2 years from September 2023.
      • Enters into force 120 days after the 60th ratification (currently ratified by 55 countries).
    [UPSC 2022] With reference to the United Nations Convention on the Law of Sea, consider the following statements:

    1. A coastal state has the right to establish the breadth of its territorial sea up to a limit not exceeding 12 nautical miles, measured from baseline determined in accordance with the convention.

    2. Ships of all states, whether coastal or land-locked, enjoy the right of innocent passage through the territorial sea.

    3. The Exclusive Economic Zone shall not extend beyond 200 nautical miles from the baseline from which the breadth of the territorial sea is measured.

    Which of the statements given above are correct?

    Options: (a) 1 and 2 only (b) 2 and 3 only (c) 1 and 3 only (d) 1, 2 and 3*

     

  • Decoding the SC order on regulatory assets

    Introduction

    India’s electricity sector faces a chronic mismatch between the cost of supply and the revenue collected, leaving distribution companies (DISCOMs) financially stressed. To bridge this gap, regulatory assets, unrecovered costs deferred for future recovery, have become common. The Supreme Court has now ordered DISCOMs and regulators to clear these within strict timelines and capped their creation, marking a crucial step towards financial discipline and consumer protection in the power sector.

    Significance of the Supreme Court’s Directive

    The Supreme Court directed State Electricity Regulatory Commissions (SERCs) and DISCOMs to clear existing regulatory assets within four years and any new ones within three years, while capping their creation at 3% of Annual Revenue Requirement (ARR). The Court also mandated transparent recovery roadmaps and intensive audits for non-compliant DISCOMs.The judgment is significant because it marks the first time the Supreme Court has set explicit timelines and caps for the liquidation of regulatory assets. With Delhi DISCOMs alone carrying regulatory assets worth over ₹58,000 crore, and Tamil Nadu reporting ₹89,375 crore in FY 2021-22, the scale of the problem is massive. The ruling highlights how the misuse of regulatory assets has become systemic, leading to debt accumulation, delayed payments to generators, and poor grid modernisation.

    Understanding Regulatory Assets

    1. Definition: Regulatory assets are deferred costs created when the Average Cost of Supply (ACS) is higher than the ARR, allowing DISCOMs to recover the gap later instead of burdening consumers immediately.
    2. Example: If ACS = ₹7.20/unit and ARR = ₹7.00/unit, the shortfall of ₹0.20 per unit across 10 billion units leads to a revenue gap of ₹2,000 crore, which becomes a regulatory asset.
    3. Consumer relief: Prevents immediate tariff shocks but leads to deferred steep tariff hikes later, often with interest.

    Causes of the Average Cost of Supply (ACS)- Annual Revenue Requirement (ARR) Gap

    1. Non-cost reflective tariffs: Tariffs often kept artificially low for political reasons.
    2. Delayed subsidies: State governments fail to release subsidies for agriculture or low-income households on time, worsening DISCOM finances.
    3. Fuel price shocks: Sudden increases in coal/gas prices inflate procurement costs.
    4. Historical evidence: Punjab’s 2004–05 case of ₹487 crore revenue gap set the precedent for regulatory assets in India.

    Impact of regulatory assets on consumers and DISCOMs

    1. Consumers:
      • Immediate stability in tariffs but eventual steeper hikes.
      • Example: Delhi DISCOMs must recover ₹16,580 crore annually in four years, implying an additional ₹5.5/unit on average.
    2. DISCOMs:
      • Persistent cash flow crises as revenue doesn’t cover costs.
      • Forced to borrow → higher debt burden.
      • Limited capacity to modernise grids, integrate renewables, or improve services.
      • Creates a vicious cycle of financial and operational distress.

    Regulatory Assets and Grid Modernisation

    1. Yes: Large unrecovered costs reduce capital available for investment in infrastructure.
    2. Renewable integration challenge: Financially weak DISCOMs are unable to invest in flexible grids or storage solutions.
    3. Consumer service compromise: Lower quality of supply, billing inefficiencies, and lack of digital modernisation.

    Way forward

    1. Cost-reflective tariffs: Rationalise tariffs while shielding vulnerable consumers with targeted subsidies.
    2. Timely subsidy release: State governments must ensure fiscal discipline.
    3. Automatic fuel cost adjustments: Tariffs should respond dynamically to input cost fluctuations.
    4. Annual true-up exercises: Prevent backlog accumulation by reconciling projections with actual costs.
    5. Regulatory discipline: Enforce caps, transparency, and timelines to ensure regulatory assets remain exceptional, not structural.

    Conclusion

    The Supreme Court’s directive signals a turning point for India’s power sector. It underlines the urgent need for financial discipline, timely subsidies, and transparent tariff setting. If implemented well, this move could break the cycle of deferred costs and inefficiencies, ensuring that electricity supply remains both affordable for consumers and financially viable for utilities. For policymakers, it serves as a reminder that delaying reforms through regulatory tools only compounds systemic risks.

    Value Addition

    Importance of DISCOMs in India’s Power Sector

    1. DISCOMs are the last-mile link in the electricity chain, responsible for delivering power to households, industries, and agriculture.
    2. Their financial health directly impacts energy access, affordability, and quality of supply.

    Current Financial Stress

    1. AT&C Losses: Aggregate Technical & Commercial losses remain high at ~16–20% (against a target of 12–15%).
    2. Revenue Gap: ACS > ARR leads to losses per unit supplied.
    3. Debt Burden: Many DISCOMs rely on borrowing to bridge gaps, adding to systemic financial stress.

    Key Causes of DISCOM Distress

    1. Non-cost reflective tariffs: Political pressure keeps tariffs lower than actual supply cost.
    2. Delayed subsidies: State governments often delay releasing agricultural/poor household subsidies.
    3. Cross-subsidisation: Industrial and commercial consumers are charged higher rates to subsidise other sectors, affecting competitiveness.
    4. Fuel price volatility: Sudden spikes in coal/gas prices worsen procurement costs.

    Government Initiatives for DISCOMs

    1. UDAY (2015): Transferred debt to State governments, targeted efficiency improvements.
    2. Revamped Distribution Sector Scheme (RDSS) (2021): RDSS, focuses on smart meters, loss reduction, and IT-based monitoring.
    3. Electricity Amendment Bill (2022) (proposed): Aims to promote competition, allow multiple distributors in the same area, and reduce monopolies.

    DISCOMs and Energy Transition

    1. Financially weak DISCOMs struggle to integrate renewable energy and invest in smart grids, storage, and modernisation.
    2. This hampers India’s 2030 renewable energy targets (500 GW capacity, 50% non-fossil share).

    Global Comparisons

    1. Many countries (e.g., UK, Germany) have cost-reflective tariff mechanisms and automatic adjustment clauses to prevent accumulation of arrears.
    2. India’s reliance on regulatory assets is unusual, reflecting deeper political economy challenges.

    PYQ Relevance

    [UPSC 2021] “Access to affordable, reliable, sustainable and modern energy is the sine qua non to achieve Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).’’ Comment on the progress made in India in this regard.

    Linkage: The Supreme Court’s directive on regulatory assets directly ties to SDG 7 (Affordable and Clean Energy) by addressing the financial distress of DISCOMs, which undermines both affordability for consumers and sustainability for utilities. India has expanded electricity access impressively, but the persistence of unrecovered costs, delayed subsidies, and non-cost-reflective tariffs highlight the fragility of the system. The judgment pushes for financial discipline, timely subsidy release, and transparent tariff recovery, ensuring that progress towards universal, reliable, and modern energy access is not compromised by systemic inefficiencies.

  • [pib] PRATUSH Mission

    Why in the News?

    Raman Research Institute (RRI) has devised the Probing ReionizATion of the Universe using Signal from Hydrogen (PRATUSH) Telescope to study the “Cosmic Dawn” by detecting radio signals from neutral hydrogen gas.

    About the PRATUSH Mission:

    • Developer: Designed by the Raman Research Institute (RRI), Bengaluru, an autonomous institute under the Department of Science and Technology (DST).
    • Main Goal: To study the Cosmic Dawn – the period when the first stars and galaxies formed – by detecting the faint 21-cm radio signal from neutral hydrogen.
    • Why from the Moon? On Earth, these signals get lost due to radio noise (like FM signals) and atmospheric distortions. The lunar far side is the quietest place in the inner Solar System for radio astronomy, making it the best site.
    • Scientific Importance: Will help scientists understand how the first stars heated and ionized hydrogen gas, how the early Universe changed, and may even give clues about dark matter and fundamental physics.

    Key Features:

    • Compact Design: Small, lightweight, low-power, and cost-effective – in line with the global trend of miniaturized space instruments.
    • Digital Receiver System:
      • Uses a single-board computer (like Raspberry Pi prototype).
      • Equipped with FPGA (Field Programmable Gate Array) for high-speed radio data processing.
    • How it Works:
      • Antenna collects faint hydrogen signals.
      • Analog receiver amplifies them.
      • Digital receiver + FPGA convert them into detailed spectral fingerprints of sky brightness.
    • Test Results: Lab trials (352 hours) showed extremely low noise (few millikelvins), proving it can detect faint cosmic signals.
    • SWaP Advantage: Optimized for Size, Weight, and Power (SWaP), making it highly suitable for space deployment.
    [UPSC 2010]  In the context of space technology, what is Bhuvan, recently in the news?

    Options:

    (a) A mini satellite launched by ISRO for promoting the distance education in India

    (b) The name given to the next Moon Impact Probe, for Chandrayaan-II

    (c) A geoportal of ISRO with 3D imaging capabilities of India *

    (d) A space telescope developed by ISRO

     

  • Vikram 32-Bit Processor

    Why in the News?

    Union Minister for Electronics & IT has presented PM with a memento containing the first ‘Made in India’ Vikram 32-bit Launch Vehicle Grade Processor (VIKRAM3201).

    About Vikram 32-bit Processor (VIKRAM3201):

    • Overview: India’s first fully indigenous 32-bit space-grade microprocessor, developed by VSSC–ISRO with Semiconductor Laboratory (SCL), Chandigarh.
    • Lineage: Successor of 16-bit VIKRAM1601 (used since 2009 in ISRO launch vehicles), designed for avionics, navigation, guidance, and mission control.
    • Launch & Validation: Unveiled at Semicon India 2025 as a symbol of India’s semiconductor self-reliance. Validated in space during PSLV-C60 (2025) via POEM-4 experiments.
    • Applications: Primarily for space missions, but also suited for defence, automotive, and energy systems due to its rugged reliability.
    • Policy Support: Developed under India Semiconductor Mission and Design Linked Incentive (DLI) scheme, reflecting policy thrust on indigenous chip design and manufacturing.

    Key Technical Features:

    • Architecture: 32-bit design with support for 16/32-bit fixed-point and 64-bit floating-point (IEEE754) operations, essential for trajectory precision.
    • Registers & Memory: 32 registers (32-bit wide), capable of addressing up to 4096M words of memory.
    • Instruction Set: 152 instructions with microprogrammed control for flexibility in aerospace computations.
    • Performance: Operates at 100 MHz, single 3.3V supply, consumes <500 mW power, with <10 mA quiescent current.
    • Environmental Tolerance: Functions between –55°C to +125°C, fit for space and military conditions.
    • Interfaces: Equipped with four 32-bit timers, 256 software interrupts, and dual on-chip 1553B bus interfaces for avionics communication.
    • Software Compatibility: Optimised for Ada language (aerospace standard); C compiler support under development by ISRO.
    • Packaging & Fabrication: Built in a 181-pin ceramic PGA package, fabricated on 180 nm CMOS process at SCL, Mohali.
    [UPSC 2008] Which one of the following laser types is used in a laser printer?

    Options: (a) Dye laser  (b) Gas laser (c) Semiconductor laser  (d) Excimer laser

     

  • [2nd September 2025] The Hindu Op-ed: The rise and risks of health insurance in India

    PYQ Relevance

    [UPSC 2023] Examine the pattern and trend of public expenditure on social services in the post-reforms period in India. To what extent this has been in consonance with achieving the objective of inclusive growth?

    Linkage: The expansion of Pradhan Mantri Jan Arogya Yojana (PM-JAY) and State Health Insurance Programmes (SHIPs) shows rising public expenditure on health but largely towards insurance reimbursements rather than strengthening primary health infrastructure. This trend benefits private hospitals and tertiary care but fails to reduce out-of-pocket costs or enhance inclusivity, as utilisation remains low. Thus, the expenditure pattern reflects growth without true inclusiveness, misaligned with the objectives of inclusive growth.

    Mentor’s Comment

    The debate on health insurance in India has intensified in recent years, especially with the expansion of State-sponsored schemes like Pradhan Mantri Jan Arogya Yojana (PM-JAY). While these initiatives provide some relief, the core question remains: can insurance-driven models substitute for robust public health infrastructure? This article unpacks the illusion of universal health coverage (UHC) through insurance, its systemic risks, and the urgent need for course correction.

    Introduction

    The Bhore Committee Report (1946) defined UHC as guaranteed access to quality health care for every citizen irrespective of their ability to pay. Eight decades later, India still falls far short of this goal. Instead of strengthening public health infrastructure, India has leaned heavily on health insurance schemes like the PMJAY and State Health Insurance Programmes (SHIPs). Though they provide relief to some, these schemes have created new distortions, risks, and inequities in the health system.

    The Surge of Health Insurance Schemes

    1. PMJAY Launch (2018): Landmark scheme under Ayushman Bharat with ₹5 lakh annual cover per household for in-patient care.
    2. Massive Coverage: In 2023–24, PMJAY covered 58.8 crore individuals with an annual budget of ₹12,000 crore.
    3. Parallel SHIPs: State-level schemes cover a similar number with a budget of at least ₹16,000 crore.
    4. Rising Budgets: SHIP allocations grew at 8–25% annually (2018–19 to 2023–24) in States like Gujarat, Kerala, Maharashtra.

    Commercialisation of Healthcare under Insurance

    1. Two-thirds of the PMJAY budget flows to private hospitals, often profit-oriented.
    2. Study findings: Minimal change in hospitalisation rates, but rise in private hospital use.
    3. Weak regulation: India’s poorly regulated profit-seeking providers dominate the system.

    Hospitalisation Bias in Insurance Models

    1. Bias towards hospitalisation: Insurance covers only in-patient care, neglecting primary and outpatient care.
    2. Ageing challenge: Expanding coverage to elderly (70+) risks disproportionate spending on tertiary care.

    Challenges in Effective Utilisation of Coverage

    1. High theoretical coverage: 80% of the population enrolled under PMJAY + SHIPs.
    2. Low effective use: Only 35% of insured patients could utilise benefits (2022–23 HCES).
    3. Barriers: Lack of awareness, procedural hurdles, and discrimination by providers.

    Discrimination in Healthcare Delivery

    1. Private hospitals: Prefer uninsured patients for higher commercial charges.
    2. Public hospitals: Prefer insured patients for reimbursement incentives.
    3. Result: Discriminatory treatment and pressure on patients to enrol immediately.

    Financial Strains Leading to Hospital Withdrawals

    1. Pending dues: PMJAY arrears reached ₹12,161 crore, more than its annual budget.
    2. Provider dissatisfaction: Low reimbursement, long delays.
    3. Hospital exits: 609 hospitals opted out of PMJAY since inception.

    Corruption and Irregularities in PMJAY and SHIPs

    1. Fraudulent practices: NHA flagged 3,200 hospitals for irregularities.
    2. Common issues: Overcharging, denial of treatment, unnecessary procedures.
    3. Weak safeguards: No evidence of effective audits or transparency in scheme portals.

    The Systemic Risk of Insurance-Led Health Care

    1. Profit over patients: Insurance reinforces commercial medicine rather than correcting it.
    2. Underfunded public health: India spends only 1.3% of GDP on health (World Bank, 2022), vs world average of 6.1%.
    3. Comparative failure: Unlike Canada and Thailand, India’s schemes lack universal coverage and non-profit focus.
    4. Result: Insurance becomes a “painkiller”, not a cure for India’s broken public health system.

    Conclusion

    Health insurance in India has expanded rapidly, but it remains a fragile foundation for UHC. It fosters profit-driven medicine, neglects primary care, suffers from poor utilisation, and is riddled with corruption. Without massive investment in public health infrastructure, primary care, and regulation, India cannot hope to achieve universal health coverage. Insurance schemes, at best, provide temporary relief, not sustainable health security.

    Value Addition
    1. National Health Policy, 2017: Targets increasing government health expenditure to 2.5% of GDP by 2025, but current levels remain at ~1.3%.
    2. High Out-of-Pocket Expenditure (OOPE): As per NSSO 2017–18, OOPE in India still accounts for over 50% of total health expenditure, one of the highest in the world.
    3. Lancet Commission on Global Surgery (2015): Highlighted that nearly 5 billion people worldwide lack access to safe, affordable surgery, underscoring the gaps in India’s insurance-driven, hospitalisation-focused approach.
    4. WHO Recommendation: For effective Universal Health Coverage (UHC), countries need to strengthen primary health systems — India still lags here, with sub-centres and PHCs facing severe staff shortages.
    5. National Health Accounts (NHAI) 2019–20: Show that private sector spending dominates health financing in India, with households bearing the brunt, unlike in OECD nations where governments fund the majority.
    6. Insurance Penetration vs. Health Security: India’s insurance penetration (life + non-life) is about 4.2% of GDP, but penetration does not automatically translate to healthcare access or financial protection.
    7. Ayushman Bharat Health and Wellness Centres (AB-HWCs): Intended to provide comprehensive primary healthcare (preventive + promotive), yet remain underfunded compared to PMJAY, skewing priorities.
    8. Equity Gap – Rural vs. Urban: Rural populations face doctor-population ratio deficits, with most PMJAY empanelled hospitals concentrated in urban centres, worsening regional disparities.
    9. Digital Health Mission (NDHM 2020): Aims to create digital health IDs and improve transparency, but challenges include digital divide and privacy concerns.
    10. Economic Survey 2020–21: Stressed that public health investment has high multiplier effects on productivity and human capital formation — much higher than insurance subsidies.