💥Join UPSC 2027,2028 Mentorship (June Batch) + XFactor Notes & Microthemes PDF

Performance of welfare schemes that are implemented for vulnerable sections is not so effective due to absence of their awareness and active involvement at all stages of policy process – Discuss.

The Directive Principles of State Policy (Articles 41), envisions a welfare state that ensures social justice and empowerment of vulnerable sections. However, their impact is limited due to design and implementation gaps.

Absence of awareness and active involvement

Policy Making

Poor Representation in Design – Lack of beneficiary consultation leads to top-down, one-size-fits-all schemes. Eg- uniform guidelines under PMAY

Absence of local participation results in policies ignoring grassroots realities.

Misallocation of Priorities- Without local input, funds get diverted to non-core activities. Eg- Beti Bachao Beti Padhao spent 80% of funds on publicity

Political populism and short termism rather than long term capability building approach. Eg- Farm Loan Waiver

Policy Implementation

Limited Awareness of Rights and Entitlements – Eg- MGNREGA workers rarely claim unemployment allowance due to ignorance of provisions.

Poor Coordination – Absence of SHGs, PRIs, and NGOs in execution leads to leakages and inefficiency. Eg- leakages in PDS

Digital and Social Exclusion – Digital illiteracy limits registration and access.

Policy Monitoring

Weak Social Accountability MechanismsEg- Social audits under MGNREGA are irregular in several states.

Absence of Community Oversight- Eg- NFSA grievance redressal committees underperform due to lack of public participation.

Crisis Management

In disasters, schemes fail to respond effectively due to missing local coordination. Eg- Migrant crisis during COVID-19 lockdown

Weak Role of Civil Society in Emergency Delivery- Limited engagement with NGOs reduces last-mile efficiency.

However, there are few success stories

Mid-Day Meal (POSHAN) -Reduced hunger and educational deprivation.

Direct Benefit Transfer saved 3.48 lakh crore of government.

Social Audit of MGNREGA – Andhra Pradesh Model

Participatory Democracy – Peoples Plan Campaign of Kerala

Way Forward

Institutionalising Social Audit and Citizen Charters with legal backing

Strengthening Grassroot democracy through effective devolution and principle of subsidiarity

Bottom-up Planning – Porto Alegre Brazil Model

Inclusive Development- Involve SHGs, and CSOs in design, execution, and feedback.

Ensuring “people-centric governance” through information, inclusion, and participation aligns with the vision of “Sabka Saath, Sabka Vikas, Sabka Vishwas”