💥Join UPSC 2027,2028 Mentorship (August Batch) + XFactor Notes & Microthemes PDF
Talk to Mentor

Civilsdaily

Login

Search results for: “”

  • [29th May 2026] The Hindu OpED: Will increasing the strength of the SC solve the pendency problem

    PYQ Relevance[UPSC 2024] Explain the reasons for the growth of Public Interest Litigation in India. As a result of it, has the Indian Supreme Court emerged as the world’s most powerful judiciaryLinkage: The PYQ examines the expanding role and jurisdiction of the Supreme Court, which lies at the core of the present debate on pendency and judicial burden.The article discusses judicial reforms and institutional capacity of the Supreme Court. Efficient justice delivery is essential for preserving judicial independence and constitutional governance.

    Mentor’s Comment

    The Union government has recently increased the sanctioned strength of the Supreme Court from 34 to 38 judges, reviving an old debate on judicial reforms: Can more judges solve India’s mounting judicial pendency? The issue has direct relevance for judicial reforms, separation of powers, access to justice, and constitutional governance in India.

    What is the Constitutional Provision Governing the Number of Supreme Court Judges?

    1. Article 124(1): Establishes the Supreme Court and provides for a Chief Justice of India (CJI) and other judges.
    2. Parliamentary Power: The Constitution does not fix a permanent number of judges. It authorises Parliament to determine the number of judges by law.
    3. Flexible Institutional Design: Enables periodic expansion of judicial strength based on rising caseload, pendency, and administrative requirements.

    How has the Number of Supreme Court Judges Increased?

    1. Ordinary Legislation: Increase in judicial strength requires amendment of the Supreme Court (Number of Judges) Act, 1956.
    2. No Constitutional Amendment Required: Since Article 124 empowers Parliament, increase occurs through ordinary parliamentary legislation, not a constitutional amendment under Article 368.
    3. Recent Change (2025): Parliament passed the Supreme Court (Number of Judges) Amendment Bill, 2025, increasing sanctioned strength from 34 to 38 judges.
    4. Ordinance Route: The President promulgated an ordinance under Article 123 before Parliament formally completed the process, despite Parliament expected to convene shortly.

    How Has the Supreme Court’s Strength Increased Over Time?

    YearStrength of SC Judges
    19508 (including CJI)
    195611
    196014
    197718
    198626
    200931
    201934
    202538

    What Does This Trend Indicate?

    1. Rising Caseload: Expansion reflects increasing litigation and constitutional responsibilities.
    2. Persistent Pendency: Repeated increases have not prevented rising backlog, indicating structural inefficiencies beyond numerical shortage.
    3. Shift in Institutional Role: Expansion coincides with the Supreme Court increasingly functioning as a general appellate court, rather than primarily a constitutional court.

    Can Increasing Judicial Strength Alone Reduce Pendency in the Supreme Court?

    1. Judicial Capacity: Increasing sanctioned strength from 34 to 38 judges enhances disposal capacity and may reduce waiting time for hearings.
    2. Limited Impact: Pendency of nearly 94,000 cases suggests backlog is structural rather than merely numerical.
    3. Historical Continuity: Successive governments have periodically increased judicial strength, yet pendency continues to rise.
    4. Institutional Limitation: More judges do not automatically improve efficiency unless accompanied by procedural reforms.
    5. Concerns Over Ordinance Route: The government introduced the increase through an ordinance, despite Parliament being expected to convene soon, raising concerns about legislative bypass.

    Has the Supreme Court Drifted from Its Intended Constitutional Role?

    1. Constitutional Design: The Supreme Court was envisioned primarily as a constitutional court, dealing with substantial constitutional interpretation.
    2. Article 136 Expansion: The Court’s extraordinary power under Article 136 (Special Leave Petition) has expanded its jurisdiction significantly.
    3. Routine Appeals: A substantial share of the Court’s docket is now occupied by SLPs, converting the Court into a de facto regular appellate court.
    4. Judicial Observation (2016): A Constitution Bench refused to restrict Article 136, observing that no effort should be made to reduce the Court’s powers.
    5. Consequences: Excessive appellate workload diverts attention from constitutional matters of national significance.

    Do Special Leave Petitions (SLPs) Contribute to Judicial Backlog?

    1. Extraordinary Remedy: SLPs were designed as exceptional remedies under Article 136 for rare cases involving grave injustice.
    2. Judicial Overreach of Scope: SLPs now dominate a substantial portion of Supreme Court litigation.
    3. Absence of Guidelines: Lack of strict admission standards has encouraged indiscriminate filing.
    4. Case Example: Vijaya Bank v. Prashant B. Narnaware: A contractual employment dispute reached the Supreme Court despite involving issues more suited for lower courts.
    5. Constitutional Concern: Excessive admission of routine matters dilutes the Court’s constitutional focus.

    Does Government Litigation Worsen Judicial Pendency?

    1. Largest Litigant: Governments remain among the largest litigants in Indian courts.
    2. National Litigation Policy Failure: The proposed National Litigation Policy (NLP) aimed to reduce avoidable government litigation but was never effectively implemented.
    3. Routine Appeals Culture: Government departments frequently pursue appeals even in settled legal matters.
    4. Administrative Inconsistency: Frequent changes in legal officers produce contradictory litigation strategies.
    5. Institutional Burden: Excessive state appeals consume judicial time and prolong case disposal.
    6. Illustration: Cases often remain pending for years before reaching the Supreme Court because High Courts do not conclusively settle disputes.

    Will More Benches Improve Consistency or Create Conflicting Judgments?

    1. Expanded Bench Strength: More judges imply greater number of division benches.
    2. Potential Benefit: Greater benches may increase disposal rates and reduce waiting time.
    3. Risk of Fragmentation: Larger bench numbers may generate inconsistent judicial interpretations.
    4. Polyvocality Challenge: Different benches may reach different conclusions on similar legal principles.
    5. Need for Coordination: Greater reference to larger Constitution Benches becomes essential for doctrinal consistency.

    Can Institutional Reforms Address Pendency More Effectively Than Numerical Expansion?

    1. Filtering Mechanism: Strengthens scrutiny of frivolous litigation, particularly under Article 136.
    2. Case Prioritisation: Ensures only cases involving substantial constitutional questions reach the Supreme Court.
    3. Written Submissions: Reduces prolonged oral arguments and judicial time consumption.
    4. Bench Management: Facilitates better coordination among benches to reduce conflicting rulings.
    5. High Court Empowerment: Encourages High Courts to decisively settle disputes rather than passing litigation upward.
    6. Case Illustration: State of Uttaranchal v. Balwant Singh Chaufal (2010): Supreme Court stressed that Public Interest Litigation (PIL) must serve genuine public causes and not personal interests.

    Can Judicial Appointments Improve Gender Representation?

    1. New Opportunity: Four additional judicial positions create scope for increasing women’s representation.
    2. Gender Gap: High Courts continue to have relatively low numbers of senior women judges.
    3. Transparency Need: Judicial appointments require greater openness and diversity considerations.
    4. Convention Bias: Seniority norms have often disadvantaged women in elevation to higher courts.

    Conclusion

    Increasing the sanctioned strength of the Supreme Court from 34 to 38 judges may improve disposal rates and reduce immediate workload pressures, but pendency is fundamentally a structural and institutional challenge rather than a purely numerical one. Sustainable reform requires restoring the Court’s constitutional role through stricter filtering of Special Leave Petitions (SLPs), reducing excessive government litigation, strengthening High Courts, improving case management, and ensuring doctrinal consistency. Judicial expansion can facilitate faster justice only when accompanied by systemic reforms that enhance efficiency, coherence, and access to justice.

  • Why SC online gaming tax verdict could be a final death blow to sector

    Why in the News?

    The Supreme Court recently upheld the constitutional validity of the government’s retrospective 28% GST levy on online real-money gaming, reviving tax demands of nearly ₹2.5 lakh crore against gaming companies, fantasy sports platforms, and casinos. The ruling is significant because it overturns relief granted by the Karnataka High Court .

    Understanding Online Gaming in India: What is Being Regulated?

    1. Online gaming refers to digital games played over the internet through mobile applications, websites, or gaming platforms.
    2. In India, the sector includes real-money gaming, fantasy sports, skill-based games (rummy, poker), casino-style betting, and casual entertainment gaming. 
    3. The regulatory challenge arises because gaming falls at the intersection of technology, taxation, public order, consumer protection, and gambling laws, with different legal treatment depending on the nature of the game.

    How is online gaming regulated in India?

    1. Constitutional Position: Betting and gambling fall under the State List (Entry 34, List II, Seventh Schedule), allowing states to enact their own laws. This has created a fragmented regulatory landscape.
    2. Central Regulation: The Union government regulates aspects relating to intermediary liability, digital platforms, taxation, cybersecurity, money laundering, and online content.
    3. IT Rules Framework: The Information Technology (Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code) Rules, 2021, amended in 2023, introduced provisions for regulation of online real-money games, due diligence by intermediaries, and verification mechanisms.
    4. State-Level Variation: States adopt differing approaches:
      1. Permissive Approach: States such as Sikkim and Nagaland license certain online skill games.
      2. Restrictive Approach: States such as Tamil Nadu and Telangana imposed restrictions on some online money games citing addiction and public welfare concerns.
    5. Tax Regulation: Since October 2023, online gaming, casinos, and horse racing attract 28% GST on the full face value of bets/deposits, rather than only platform commissions.

    What is the difference between a ‘Game of Skill’ and a ‘Game of Chance’?

    Game of Skill

    1. A game in which success predominantly depends upon a player’s knowledge, training, strategy, judgment, or expertise, even if some chance element exists.
    2. Examples:
      1. Rummy: Recognised by courts as substantially skill-based.
      2. Fantasy Sports (Dream11): Judicial rulings have treated team selection requiring statistical judgment as skill-oriented.
      3. Chess, Bridge, E-sports: Depend primarily on cognitive ability and strategy.
      4. Judicial Position: Courts have held that a game remains one of skill if skill predominates over chance.

    Game of Chance

    1. A game in which outcomes depend predominantly on luck, randomness, or uncertain events, with limited influence of player expertise.
    2. Examples:
      1. Roulette
      2. Slot machines
      3. Lottery
      4. Casino gambling
    3. These activities are generally treated as betting or gambling and face stricter regulation.

    Why does the skill-versus-chance distinction matter?

    1. Legal Treatment: Games of skill generally receive greater constitutional protection under Article 19(1)(g) (right to trade/business), whereas gambling may face prohibition.
    2. Taxation: The GST dispute emerged because gaming firms argued that skill-based games should be taxed on Gross Gaming Revenue (GGR) rather than total player deposits.
    3. State Regulation: Several states permit skill games while prohibiting gambling and betting.
    4. Consumer Welfare: Governments increasingly view even skill-based money gaming through a public health lens due to addiction concerns.

    Why has the Supreme Court verdict become a watershed moment for India’s online gaming sector?

    1. Retrospective Tax Validation: Upholds the constitutional validity of the 28% GST levy retrospectively, reviving tax notices worth approximately ₹2.5 lakh crore against gaming firms, fantasy sports companies, and casinos.
    2. Judicial Finality: Settles a prolonged legal dispute by dismissing petitions filed by gaming companies challenging GST demands and retrospective tax notices.
    3. Reversal of Earlier Relief: Overturns relief granted by the Karnataka High Court to Gameskraft, which had challenged a ₹21,000 crore GST notice.
    4. Massive Fiscal Exposure: Creates unprecedented liabilities for firms such as Dream11, which reportedly faced notices of around ₹40,000 crore, and Delta Corp, which received notices totalling ₹23,204 crore.

    How did the dispute over GST liability on online gaming emerge?

    1. Taxation Ambiguity: Emerged from disagreement over whether GST should apply only on platform fees/commissions (Gross Gaming Revenue-GGR) or on the full value of deposits/bets placed by users.
    2. Industry Position: Argued that taxation should apply prospectively from 1 October 2023, following GST Council amendments.
    3. Government Position: Treated real-money gaming involving uncertain outcomes as betting and gambling, irrespective of skill elements.
    4. Skill vs Chance Debate: The industry maintained that games such as fantasy sports and rummy involve skill and should be taxed differently from gambling.
    5. Supreme Court Position: Accepted the government’s interpretation by treating online money gaming involving uncertain outcomes as taxable similarly to betting activities.

    Why is taxation on the ‘full face value’ of bets controversial?

    1. Commercial Unsustainability: Imposes GST on the entire deposited amount rather than platform earnings, substantially increasing tax liability.
    2. Revenue Mismatch: Creates tax demands many times higher than cumulative revenues generated by companies.
    3. Retrospective Burden: Applies liabilities to past operations, creating sudden and severe liquidity pressures.
    4. Consumer Pricing Constraints: Restricts firms’ ability to transfer increased tax burdens to users due to market competition and affordability concerns.
    5. Business Viability Risk: Forces firms to reconsider business models, downsize operations, or shift to alternative sectors.
    6. Illustration: A platform earning only a small commission on player deposits may still face taxation on the total deposited amount, sharply inflating liabilities.

    Does the verdict strengthen fiscal governance or undermine ease of doing business?

    1. Tax Certainty: Strengthens clarity by resolving prolonged legal ambiguity regarding GST treatment.
    2. Revenue Protection: Enhances government capacity to prevent tax avoidance and regulatory arbitrage.
    3. Consumer Protection: Aligns with state concerns regarding gambling addiction and financial vulnerability among youth.
    4. Retrospective Taxation Concerns: Raises questions regarding predictability of taxation, a core element of investment confidence.
    5. Ease of Doing Business: Creates apprehensions regarding sudden regulatory shifts affecting emerging digital sectors.
    6. Regulatory Signalling: Indicates stronger state oversight over digital platforms operating in legally grey areas.

    How has India’s regulatory approach towards online gaming evolved?

    1. Tax Tightening: GST Council introduced 28% GST on online gaming based on the face value of bets.
    2. Security Concerns: Authorities flagged concerns relating to digital wallets, cryptocurrency-based transfers, illicit fund movement, and money laundering.
    3. National Security Risks: Identified gaming platforms as potential communication channels for organised criminal and extremist activities.
    4. Legal Restrictions: The Promotion and Regulation of Online Gaming (PROG) Act, 2025 introduced strict restrictions on online money gaming platforms.
    5. Financial Restrictions: Prohibits banks and financial institutions from facilitating transactions linked to prohibited platforms.
    6. Penal Consequences: Provides imprisonment and financial penalties for operators, promoters, and facilitators of prohibited gaming activities.

    Can India balance innovation in digital gaming with regulatory safeguards?

    1. Regulatory Clarity: Requires a transparent legal distinction between games of skill and games of chance.
    2. Consumer Safeguards: Ensures age verification, spending limits, addiction prevention, and grievance redressal.
    3. Proportionate Taxation: Supports sustainable taxation aligned with actual revenue generation.
    4. Technology Oversight: Strengthens anti-money laundering (AML) and cybersecurity frameworks.
    5. Economic Potential: Recognises gaming as part of India’s digital economy, employment generation, and technology ecosystem.
    6. Federal Coordination: Requires harmonisation between central taxation policies and state gambling laws.

    Conclusion

    The Supreme Court verdict represents more than a taxation dispute; it signals a decisive shift in India’s governance of emerging digital sectors. While the judgment strengthens regulatory clarity and fiscal oversight, the retrospective nature and scale of tax liabilities raise concerns regarding investment certainty and innovation. India’s challenge lies in designing a framework that simultaneously ensures consumer protection, revenue integrity, and sustainable growth of legitimate digital enterprises.

  • A revival of sedition tied to consent 

    Why in the News?

    The Supreme Court on May 21, 2026, clarified that courts may resume proceedings in pending sedition cases under Section 124A of the IPC if the accused voluntarily consent, partially relaxing the 2022 stay order. The development has revived debate over free speech and misuse of sedition while its constitutional validity remains pending before the Court.

    What is Sedition?

    Sedition under Section 124A of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 historically criminalised acts bringing “hatred, contempt or disaffection” against the government established by law. Although Section 124A stands repealed with the enforcement of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023, a comparable provision now exists under Section 152 of the BNS, titled “Acts Endangering Sovereignty, Unity and Integrity of India.” The Supreme Court’s recent clarification primarily concerns pending Section 124A IPC cases, while the constitutional debate has now expanded to include Section 152 of the BNS.

    FeatureSection 124A IPCSection 152 BNS
    LawIndian Penal Code, 1860Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023
    Offence NameSeditionActs Endangering Sovereignty, Unity and Integrity of India
    FocusHatred/disaffection against governmentSecession, armed rebellion, separatism, subversive activities
    TerminologyExplicitly used term “sedition”Removes word “sedition”
    PunishmentLife imprisonment or up to 3 years + fineLife imprisonment or up to 7 years + fine
    CriticismMisuse against dissentAlleged “repackaged sedition” with broader scope

    Why has sedition remained controversial since colonial times?

    1. Colonial Origins: Sedition traces back to the Statute of Westminster, 1275, and later became part of British colonial criminal law.
    2. Colonial Instrument: Used by British authorities against Indian nationalists including Bal Gangadhar Tilak and Mahatma Gandhi.
    3. Nehru’s Criticism: Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru described sedition in Parliament (1951) as “highly objectionable and obnoxious.”
    4. Democratic Contradiction: Critics argue sedition criminalises legitimate criticism of government.
    5. Recent Misuse Example: A former independent MP and her husband reportedly faced sedition charges after allegedly threatening to recite the Hanuman Chalisa outside a former Maharashtra Chief Minister’s residence.

    How has the Supreme Court’s May 21 clarification altered the status of sedition proceedings?

    1. Judicial Clarification: Permits courts to continue trials, appeals, and proceedings under Section 124A if the accused person voluntarily consents.
    2. Partial Revival: Modifies the effective pause imposed by the Supreme Court’s May 2022 interim order, which had directed governments to refrain from registering fresh FIRs and coercive action under sedition.
    3. Case Illustration: The clarification emerged in State of Madhya Pradesh v. Kanhaiya Lal, where accused persons convicted under sedition sought appeal proceedings.
    4. Procedural Shift: Allows High Courts and lower courts to proceed selectively rather than maintaining a blanket suspension.

    Why had sedition proceedings been effectively paused since 2022?

    1. Constitutional Challenge: Multiple petitions led by S.G. Vombatkere v. Union of India questioned Section 124A for violating fundamental rights, especially free speech under Article 19(1)(a).
    2. Executive Reconsideration: The Union Government informed the Supreme Court in 2022 that it intended to re-examine the sedition provision.
    3. Interim Judicial Protection: The Court expected governments not to register new FIRs, continue investigations, or take coercive action during reconsideration.
    4. Protection Against Misuse: Intended to prevent arbitrary criminalisation of speech while constitutional validity remained unresolved.

    How does a consent-based revival create unequal legal consequences?

    1. Legal Disparity: Creates different legal outcomes between accused persons who consent to proceedings and those who refuse due to fear of imprisonment.
    2. Coercive Choice: Places vulnerable accused persons between two difficult outcomes:
      1. Consent to trial: Risk imprisonment under a constitutionally contested law.
      2. Refusal to consent: Remain indefinitely trapped in legal limbo.
    3. Unequal Burden: Individuals seeking quick closure may voluntarily proceed despite uncertainty, whereas others continue facing unresolved proceedings.
    4. Judicial Inconsistency: Produces uneven implementation of Section 124A across courts and states.

    Why is prolonged delay in deciding sedition’s constitutionality problematic?

    1. Rule of Law Concerns: Citizens remain subject to prosecution under a law whose constitutional status remains undecided.
    2. Violation of Personal Liberty: Prolonged uncertainty potentially affects Article 21 (Right to Life and Personal Liberty).
    3. Administrative Burden: Courts and police continue managing pending cases without legal clarity.
    4. Judicial Delay: The S.G. Vombatkere petitions have remained unresolved for nearly four years despite the law’s immense constitutional significance.
    5. Constitutional Ambiguity: Creates uncertainty regarding permissible limits of dissent and criticism.

    What constitutional safeguards currently govern sedition law?

    1. Kedar Nath Singh v. State of Bihar (1962): Supreme Court upheld sedition but restricted it only to speech involving incitement to violence or public disorder.
    2. Protection of Criticism: Mere criticism of government policies, measures, or actions does not amount to sedition.
    3. Article 19(2): Permits reasonable restrictions on free speech in interests of sovereignty, integrity, and public order.
    4. Article 21 Linkage: Excessive restrictions on speech may indirectly affect liberty and dignity.
    5. Judicial Balancing: Courts attempt to reconcile national security with democratic dissent.

    Should sedition continue in a constitutional democracy?

    Arguments Supporting Retention

    1. National Security: Ensures legal protection against secessionism, violent insurgency, and anti-state mobilisation.
    2. Public Order: Enables state intervention against speech directly inciting violence.
    3. Sovereignty Protection: Addresses organised attempts to destabilise constitutional authority.

    Arguments Supporting Repeal

    1. Chilling Effect: Discourages legitimate criticism and democratic dissent.
    2. Colonial Legacy: Retains a law originally designed to suppress anti-colonial voices.
    3. Potential Misuse: Broad interpretation enables politically motivated prosecutions.
    4. Redundancy: Provisions relating to terrorism, unlawful activity, criminal conspiracy, and incitement to violence already exist.

    Conclusion

    The Supreme Court’s clarification on resuming pending Section 124A IPC (sedition) proceedings for consenting accused has reopened concerns over free speech, legal certainty, and constitutional fairness. A democratic constitutional order requires that restrictions on dissent remain narrowly defined, judicially consistent, and proportionate, making an early adjudication on the validity of Section 124A IPC and Section 152 of the BNS, 2023 essential to balance national security with civil liberties.

    PYQ Relevance

    [UPSC 2014] What do you understand by the concept “freedom of speech and expression”? Does it also cover hate speech? Why do the films in India stand on a slightly different plane from other forms of expression? Discuss.

    Linkage: This PYQ examines freedom of speech and reasonable restrictions under Article 19, central to the sedition debate. Sedition similarly concerns limits on speech vis-à-vis public order, sovereignty, and democratic dissent.

  • [Accepting Admissions For UPSC Mains’26] Smash Mains 2026

    [Accepting Admissions For UPSC Mains’26] Smash Mains 2026

    Apply For Admission

    Smash Mains 2026 – A Structured, High-Discipline Initiative for Serious Aspirants Preparing For UPSC CSE Mains 2026

    We are looking for a small group of serious aspirants preparing for Mains 2026, who have already covered the basics but are still not able to translate their preparation into consistent, high-quality answer writing. We specifically want to work with aspirants who have studied sincerely, have gone through standard GS material, and yet find themselves unable to produce structured, exam-ready answers across all four GS papers.

    The objective of this initiative is simple: to help you build the discipline, structure and consistency needed to cross the 450+ mark in General Studies.

    If you are preparing for Mains 2026 and you already have your basics in place, the next few months can define your entire attempt. The purpose of this programme is simple: to put you through a disciplined, carefully sequenced routine that builds your Mains answer-writing ability, improves content depth, and gets you exam-ready.

    Apply For Admission

    How the Plan is Structured

    Smash Mains 2026 timetableDownload
    Mains Priority Microthemes Plan_CDDownload

    Apply For Smash Mains 2026

    Apply For Admission

    Over the past few years, we have seen a clear pattern in our results. Many of our top performers including those who secured ranks in earlier attempts and again found themselves in the Top 100 were students who engaged in sustained, high-quality answer writing with us. When students combine disciplined practice with guided improvement, their scores in General Studies rise sharply.

    We have tested and refined our approach quietly over the years. We are convinced that with the right direction, the right mindset, the right daily effort securing a top rank is not only possible but predictable. The purpose of the Smash Mains is to help you achieve exactly that by building the foundation for a top score in General Studies.

    This programme is designed to help you cultivate mains exam skills, in a systematic manner, over next few disciplined months. If you are willing to work every single day, follow the schedule, write answers, and internalise feedback, this plan will help you move from scattered preparation to targeted performance in Mains 2026.

    Apply For Admission

    Most aspirants know the syllabus. Many even write answers. But very few achieve consistency, structure, and exam-relevant content across all four GS papers.

    The aim of this initiative is to fix exactly that.

    Under this program, you will:

    • cover each GS theme with intent
    • focus on high-probability areas
    • write regularly
    • get feedback that actually tells you what to change
    • learn to present answers the UPSC way
    • and most importantly, build the discipline to sustain this till the exam

    What the Programme Gives You

    • A complete Mains’26 prep timetable
    • Microtheme wise coverage for all GS papers
    • Mock questions based on UPSC’s evolving pattern
    • Model answers showing structure + value addition
    • Mentorship for improvement
    • Full-length mocks at strategic points
    • Revision loops built into the plan
    • A realistic chance at scoring 450+ in GS

    6 Pillars of Smash Mains

    1. Mentorship:
      • Focus on developing your unique style rather than copying top scorers or model answers.
      • Post-test mentor calls prioritize improvement areas for future tests, with question-level evaluation.
      • Mentors stay updated on evolving UPSC standards and guide students based on their writing style.
         
    2. Question Framing:
      • Each question is designed to align with emerging UPSC trends and maximize hit-ratio.
      • Focus on repeating themes (e.g., in Art and Culture) to prepare students for probable questions.
      • Questions follow a balanced distribution that mirrors UPSC’s subject-wise weightage.
      • Detailed questions ensure that the theme and demand align with UPSC standards.
         
    3. Answer Writing Frameworks:
      • Answer writing should stay aligned with the theme and demand of the question.
      • Use of structured frameworks like DAE (Dimension-Argument-Example) to make arguments more powerful.
      • Focus on coherence, enriched introductions, well-structured body content, and thoughtful conclusions.
         
    4. Answer Evaluation:
      • Civilsdaily’s evaluation ensures consistent scoring across evaluators, reflecting true progress.
      • Feedback is structured and geared towards improving question comprehension and presentation.
      • Beyond simple marks, evaluators focus on theme demand and writing improvements.
         
    5. Model Answers:
      • Model answers go beyond basic requirements, offering enriched study content.
      • Includes data, reports, and examples with clear structure (Introduction, Body, Conclusion).
      • Specialized questions for nuanced topics help students practice effectively for the exam.
         
    6. X-Factor Notes:
      • Smash Mains provides a structured approach to building notes aligned with the Mains syllabus.
      • Notes cover all keywords from the syllabus, based on PYQs, ensuring relevance for the exam.
      • Regular guidance on note-making ensures better preparation and higher scores in Mains.

    Apply For Smash Mains 2026

    Apply For Admission

  • NeSDA 2025 Portal

    Why in the news?

    The Department of Administrative Reforms and Public Grievances (DARPG) launched the National e-Governance Service Delivery Assessment (NeSDA) 2025 Portal to strengthen digital governance and assess online public service delivery across India.

    What is NeSDA?

    NeSDA (National e-Governance Service Delivery Assessment) is:

    • A biennial assessment framework
    • Developed by DARPG
    • Based on the UN Online Service Index (OSI)
    • Customized for India’s federal structure

    Note: The UN Online Service Index (OSI) is a key component of the UN E-Government Development Index (EGDI) published by the United Nations. It measures the quality and availability of digital government services provided by countries through online platforms.

    Objective

    To assess:

    • Availability
    • Accessibility
    • Quality
    • Maturity of online government services

    Across:

    • States
    • Union Territories
    • Selected Central Ministries

    Key Features of NeSDA 2025

    Portal Categories

    • Government Portals
    • Service Delivery Portals

    Sectors Covered

    • Finance, Education, Labour & Employment, Agriculture, Health, Transport, Tourism, Public Grievance, Environment, Local Governance, and Corporate Affairs

    [2022] Consider the following:
    1. Aarogya Setu
    2. COWIN
    3. DigiLocker
    4. DIKSHA
    Which of the above are built on to open-source digital platforms?

    [A] 1 and 2 only

    [B] 2, 3 and 4 only

    [C] 1, 3 and 4 only

    [D] 1, 2, 3 and 4

  • Anti-Dumping Duties on Chemicals

    Why in News?

    Indian chemical industry associations and several ministries have sought a pause on anti-dumping investigations due to rising chemical prices and shortages caused by the West Asia conflict.

    What are Anti-Dumping Duties?

    • Anti-dumping duties are tariffs imposed on imported goods sold below fair market value to protect domestic industries from unfair competition.

    Key Issues Raised

    Rising Input Costs

    • Anti-dumping duties increase prices of chemical intermediates.
    • Impacts downstream sectors such as:
      • Textiles
      • Footwear
      • Packaging
      • Auto components
      • Paints

    Supply Chain Disruptions

    • West Asia conflict has caused shortages and price volatility in petrochemicals.

    Government Response

    • Duty Exemptions: Government of India exempted import duty on 40 petrochemical products till June 30.

    Indigenous Manufacturing Push

    The Department for Promotion of Industry and Internal Trade (DPIIT) asked industry to explore domestic production of over 200 highly import-dependent petrochemical items.

    WTO Trade Policy Review Findings

    • 51% of India’s anti-dumping measures relate to chemicals and allied industries.
    • China is the main target of these investigations.

    India’s Chemical Trade Scenario

    • Chemical imports: about $75 billion
    • Chemical exports: about $44 billion
    • Trade deficit: around $31 billion

    [2020] With reference to the international trade of India at present, which of the following statements is/are correct?

    1.India’s merchandise exports are less than its merchandise imports.
    2.India’s imports of iron and steel, chemicals, fertilisers and machinery have decreased in recent years.
    3.India’s exports of services are more than its imports of services.
    4.India suffers from an overall trade/current account deficit.
    Select the correct answer using the code given below:
    a) 1 and 2 only
    b) 2 and 4 only
    c) 3 only
    d) 1, 3 and 4 only

  • CISF Oversight for Fishing Harbours

    Why in News?

    The Ministry of Home Affairs plans to bring fishing harbours and landing centres under the security oversight of the Central Industrial Security Force (CISF) to strengthen coastal security.

    Key Highlights

    • Around 1,200 fishing harbours and landing sites to come under CISF supervision.
    • India has:
      • 1,547 notified fish landing centres and fishing harbours
      • Spread across 13 coastal States and Union Territories
    • CISF will:
      • Design security protocols
      • Guide local administration
      • Develop uniform security architecture

    Why is this Important?

    Because of large India’s coastline:

    • Extends about 7,516 km
    • Involves multiple agencies:
      • Local police
      • Indian Coast Guard
      • Indian Navy

    Lessons from 26/11 Mumbai Attacks

    • Terrorists entered Mumbai through the sea route after hijacking a fishing vessel, exposing vulnerabilities in coastal surveillance.

    About the Central Industrial Security Force

    • The Central Industrial Security Force (CISF) is a premier paramilitary organization under India’s Ministry of Home Affairs.
    • Established in 1969, it safeguards the nation’s critical industrial and infrastructure assets—including airports, seaports, power plants, and major public sector undertakings—playing a central role in India’s internal security architecture.

    [2025] With reference to the Government of India, consider the following information:
    Organization Some of its functions It works under
    I.Directorate of EnforcementEnforcement of the Fugitive Economic Offenders Act, 2018Internal Security Division- I, Ministry of Home Affairs
    II.Directorate of Revenue IntelligenceEnforces the Provisions of the Customs Act, 1962Department of Revenue, Ministry of Finance
    III.Directorate General of Systems and Data ManagementCarrying out big data analytics to assist tax officers for better policy and nabbing tax evadersDepartment of Revenue, Ministry of Finance
    In how many of the above rows is the information correctly matched?

    [A] Only one

    [B] Only two

    [C] All the three

    [D] None

  • NATO Baltic Command Centre

    Why in the news?

    Germany and the Netherlands announced the establishment of a joint NATO tactical headquarters in the Baltic region to strengthen deterrence against Russia.

    Key Highlights

    • The joint command centre is called:
      • 1GNC (German-Netherlands Corps)
    • Will operate mainly in:
      • Estonia
      • Latvia
    • Can command up to 50,000 troops

    Functions of 1GNC

    • Planning military exercises
    • Operational command during conflicts
    • Strengthening NATO’s eastern flank
    • Rapid military response capability

    About the German-Netherlands Corps

    • Established in 1995
    • Headquarters located in Münster
    • Germany and Netherlands rotate leadership
    • Supported by personnel from 14 NATO countries

    Note: The Baltic region in Northern Europe comprises the countries surrounding the Baltic Sea. It is most commonly divided into the Baltic States (Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania), alongside neighboring nations like Sweden, Finland, Denmark, Germany, Poland, and Russia.

    [2025] Consider the following countries:
    I. Austria
    II. Bulgaria
    III. Croatia
    IV. Serbia
    V. Sweden
    VI. North Macedonia
    How many of the above are members of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization?

    [A] Only three

    [B] Only four

    [C] Only five

    [D] All the six

  • Subsurface Lunar Ice Discovery (Chandrayaan-2)

    Why in the news?

    Scientists from the Physical Research Laboratory (PRL) used data from Chandrayaan-2’s Dual Frequency Synthetic Aperture Radar (DFSAR) to discover strong evidence of subsurface water-ice near the Moon’s South Pole.

    Key Findings

    • Target Location: Four “doubly shadowed craters” located inside Permanently Shadowed Regions (PSRs) at the lunar south pole.
    • Extreme Thermal Environment: These locations are permanently shielded from solar radiation, maintaining temperatures around 25 Kelvin (-248°C), acting as ideal cold traps to preserve volatiles.
    • The Prime Candidate: A 1.1 km diameter micro-crater located within the larger Faustini Crater showed the highest probability of containing clean subsurface ice.

    Geomorphological Evidence

    • Lobate-Rim Morphology: The highly-evident 1.1 km crater exhibits flow-like, lobed patterns along its rim.
    • Geological Meaning: This indicates that the initial meteoroid impact likely penetrated a layer of subsurface ice, melting it briefly to create a slurry-like, fluid ejecta pattern before re-freezing.

    About Chandrayaan-2 & DFSAR

    • Mission Context: Launched in July 2019; while its Vikram lander failed to make a soft landing, the orbiter remains fully functional in lunar orbit.
    • DFSAR Instrument: Dual Frequency Synthetic Aperture Radar.
    • Capabilities: It is the first fully polarimetric radar sent to the Moon, operating across L-band and S-band microwave frequencies to penetrate deep into the lunar regolith.

    Significance

    • In-Situ Resource Utilization (ISRU): Essential for future crewed bases (such as Artemis or India’s planned lunar base) to harvest local water for life support and rocket fuel production.
    • Strategic Mapping: Provides high-fidelity targeting data for future landing and excavation missions, including India’s upcoming Chandrayaan missions.

    Challenges

    • Accessing Cold Traps: Operating mechanical equipment in permanent darkness at 25 Kelvin presents immense engineering challenges.
    • Regolith Depth Overburden: The ice is subsurface, requiring specialized drilling and extraction systems rather than surface scraping.

    [2017] The terms ‘Event Horizon’, ‘Singularity’, ‘String Theory’ and ‘Standard Model’ are sometimes seen in the news in the context of

    [A] Observation and understanding of the Universe

    [B] Study of the solar and the lunar eclipses

    [C] Placing satellites in the orbit of the Earth

    [D] Origin and evolution of living organisms on the earth

  • [28th May 2026] The Hindu OpED: Tariff to carbon, the new rules shaping India’s trade

    PYQ Relevance[UPSC 2022] Discuss global warming and mention its effects on the global climate. Explain the control measures to bring down the level of greenhouse gases which cause global warming, in the light of the Kyoto Protocol, 1997.Linkage: CBAM directly links climate action with trade regulation, making carbon emissions economically consequential for exports. It bridges climate governance and international trade policy.

    Mentor’s Comment

    The European Union’s Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) will enter its definitive phase from January 1, 2026, imposing a carbon-linked levy on imports based on embedded emissions. This marks a major shift because, for the first time, global trade access is increasingly being linked to carbon intensity of production rather than conventional tariffs alone. For India, sectors such as steel, cement, aluminium, fertilizers, electricity, and hydrogen face direct exposure.

    What is the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM)?

    1. It is the European Union’s policy tool designed to put a fair price on carbon emitted during the production of carbon-intensive goods entering the EU. 
    2. By charging importers for embedded emissions, it aims to prevent “carbon leakage,” ensuring EU producers are not at a disadvantage compared to foreign producers and encouraging cleaner global industrial production.

    Key Aspects of CBAM:

    1. Purpose: Mitigates the risk of carbon leakage, where companies move production to countries with lenient environmental regulations.
    2. Covered Sectors: Initially, CBAM covers imports of iron and steel, cement, fertilizers, aluminum, hydrogen, and electricity.
    3. How it Works: Importers must report the GHG emissions embedded in their products. From 2026, they will need to purchase “CBAM certificates” to pay for these emissions, aligned with the carbon price paid by EU producers under the EU Emissions Trading System (ETS).
    4. Goal: The policy is a central part of the “Fit for 55” package, aiming for a 55% reduction in greenhouse gas emissions by 2030, compared to 1990 levels.

    How is CBAM reshaping the rules of global trade?

    1. Carbon-linked Market Access: Links export competitiveness to embedded carbon emissions rather than only product quality or price competitiveness.
    2. Carbon Leakage Prevention: Imposes charges on imported products to prevent industries from relocating production to countries with weaker environmental regulations.
    3. Trade Governance Shift: Moves global trade away from traditional tariff barriers toward climate-linked compliance mechanisms.
    4. Policy Diffusion: Encourages wider adoption of carbon-pricing policies by developed economies, increasing compliance burdens globally.
    5. Competitiveness Redefinition: Makes production efficiency dependent not only on cost but also on carbon efficiency of manufacturing processes.
    6. Example: The EU’s CBAM applies to steel, cement, aluminium, fertilizers, electricity, and hydrogen, sectors with high embedded carbon intensity.

    Why does CBAM pose a major challenge for India’s exports?

    1. Export Competitiveness Risk: Increases costs for carbon-intensive exports entering the European market.
    2. Steel and Aluminium Exposure: Creates immediate vulnerabilities because these sectors depend significantly on European markets and involve carbon-intensive production.
    3. Compliance Burden: Forces exporters to adopt cleaner technologies and stricter reporting systems to retain market access.
    4. Profit Margin Compression: Shrinks margins as firms absorb additional compliance costs or face stricter contractual requirements.
    5. Buyer Preference Shift: Encourages European buyers to prefer low-emission suppliers, reducing competitiveness of carbon-intensive exporters.
    6. Example: Although EU importers formally pay CBAM charges, the burden may shift to Indian exporters through stricter contracts and supplier selection mechanisms.

    How could CBAM indirectly affect India’s domestic economy?

    1. Fertilizer Price Transmission: Raises input costs because India imports fertilizers from regions affected by CBAM-related carbon pricing.
    2. Import Cost Escalation: Increases prices of imported emission-intensive goods, affecting production costs domestically.
    3. Agricultural Vulnerability: Raises fertilizer costs, potentially affecting farm profitability and food prices.
    4. Inflationary Pressure: Creates cost-push inflation through higher import prices of industrial inputs.
    5. Supply Chain Spillover: Extends impacts beyond directly targeted export sectors through global production linkages.
    6. Example: Major fertilizer exporters to India, Egypt, Russia, Morocco, and China, may pass carbon-compliance costs into export prices.

    How is CBAM different from traditional non-tariff measures (NTMs)?

    1. Structural Difference: Functions as a price-based and quantifiable carbon levy, unlike conventional product standards.
    2. Compliance Nature: Traditional NTMs rely on qualitative product standards, whereas CBAM directly prices embedded emissions.
    3. Reduced Interpretational Scope: Creates measurable obligations linked to carbon emissions rather than broad compliance requirements.
    4. Carbon Accountability: Establishes a direct relationship between production emissions and market access.
    5. Key Distinction: Traditional product standards determine whether a product qualifies for entry. CBAM determines how expensive market access becomes based on carbon intensity.

    Why are developing countries particularly vulnerable to carbon-linked trade barriers?

    1. Technology Constraints: Face limited access to low-carbon technologies and cleaner industrial systems.
    2. Cost Asymmetry: Experience higher transition costs because carbon-neutral production remains expensive.
    3. Equity Concerns: Encounter climate-linked barriers despite historically lower contributions to global emissions.
    4. Market Access Restrictions: Risk exclusion from developed markets if carbon standards tighten further.
    5. Trade Negotiation Imbalance: Face pressure to comply despite differences in developmental capacity.
    6. Example: India’s ongoing Free Trade Agreement (FTA) negotiations with the European Union continue even as CBAM raises concerns regarding fair market access.

    What domestic reforms must India undertake to remain competitive?

    1. Clean Energy Investment: Strengthens industrial decarbonisation through renewable energy and cleaner fuel adoption.
    2. Carbon Efficiency: Improves industrial competitiveness through lower emission-intensive production processes.
    3. Industrial Modernisation: Facilitates adoption of cleaner technologies in steel, cement, aluminium, and fertilizer sectors.
    4. Soil Health Management: Reduces fertilizer dependency through effective implementation of the Soil Health Card Scheme and balanced nutrient application.
    5. Domestic Production Capacity: Lowers import vulnerability by expanding local manufacturing of emission-intensive inputs.
    6. Carbon Policy Framework: Ensures gradual implementation of domestic carbon-pricing mechanisms.

    How should India respond at the international level?

    1. Equitable Trade Negotiation: Seeks fair treatment for developing countries in climate-linked trade regimes.
    2. Transition Support: Demands technology transfer and transitional finance from developed countries.
    3. Climate Justice Framework: Strengthens arguments around Common But Differentiated Responsibilities (CBDR).
    4. Multilateral Coordination: Builds coalitions among developing countries against discriminatory carbon-linked trade measures.
    5. WTO Compatibility Concerns: Questions whether climate-linked tariffs violate principles of non-discrimination in trade.

    Conclusion

    CBAM represents a structural transformation in global trade where carbon intensity increasingly determines market access. For India, the challenge lies not merely in adapting to climate-linked trade regimes but in balancing industrial competitiveness, developmental priorities, and climate commitments. A calibrated strategy combining domestic industrial decarbonisation, technology adoption, and equitable global negotiations will remain essential.

More posts