Union Home Minister recently criticized Jawaharlal Nehru’s handling of the Kashmir issue, citing two major blunders.
In response, opposition highlighted Nehru’s commitment to integrating Kashmir into India, contrasting with Sardar Patel’s initial willingness to cede Kashmir for Hyderabad.
Nehru, Patel, and the Accession Conundrum
Post-Colonial Challenges: After British departure in 1947, Jammu and Kashmir, and Hyderabad, with their distinct demographic compositions, initially sought independence.
Nehru’s Firm Stance on Kashmir: Nehru was resolute about Kashmir’s integration into India, differing from Patel’s initial stance, as noted in V Shankar’s “My Reminiscences of Sardar Patel.”
Shift in Patel’s Viewpoint: Patel’s perspective on Kashmir changed after Pakistan accepted Junagadh’s accession on September 13, 1947.
The Junagadh Accession Episode
Nawab’s Decision and India’s Reaction: The Nawab of Junagadh opted for Pakistan in 1947, leading to India’s military intervention and a subsequent plebiscite in November, favouring India with 91% votes.
Influence on Kashmir Policy: Junagadh’s accession impacted India’s policy towards princely states, particularly Kashmir.
Hyderabad’s Complex Scenario
Suggested Hyderabad-Kashmir Barter: The idea of trading Hyderabad for Kashmir, citing Victoria Schofield’s “Kashmir in Conflict,” was deemed impractical.
Patel’s Approach to Hyderabad: Patel’s initial leniency towards Hyderabad’s Nizam was influenced by his international stature and the complex political landscape.
Military Action in Hyderabad: The Indian Army’s Operation Polo in September 1948 ended the Nizam’s rule amid growing internal dissent.
Accession of Jammu and Kashmir
Maharaja Hari Singh’s Reluctance: Hari Singh, the ruler of Jammu and Kashmir, initially preferred independence.
Mounting Tensions and Pakistani Actions: Blockades and revolts in 1947, along with suspected Pakistani support for infiltrators, compelled Hari Singh to seek India’s assistance.
Conditional Accession to India: Hari Singh’s request for military aid led to Jammu and Kashmir’s accession to India in October 1947.
Analyzing Nehru’s Alleged “Blunders”
UN Involvement Controversy: The minister’s critique centers on Nehru’s decision to involve the UN and agree to a ceasefire.
Factors Influencing Nehru’s Decisions: Nehru’s decisions were influenced by international diplomacy, financial constraints, and strategic considerations.
Perspectives on the Ceasefire: While some view the ceasefire as a missed chance, others regard it as a necessary measure under the circumstances.
Conclusion
The historical decisions regarding Kashmir’s accession continue to be a topic of debate in Indian politics.
The roles of Nehru and Patel in shaping India’s territorial integrity remain subjects of intricate historical scrutiny.
Understanding these historical events is essential for informed discussions on contemporary policies and political narratives.
Google has introduced Gemini, a new multimodal general AI model, available globally through Bard.
It is seen as Google’s response to ChatGPT, offering advanced capabilities in the realm of GenAI.
What is Google Gemini?
Unlike ChatGPT, Gemini can process and operate across various formats including text, code, audio, image, and video.
Google claims Gemini Ultra surpasses current models in academic benchmarks and is the first to outperform human experts in massive multitask language understanding (MMLU).
Different versions available
Three Variants: Gemini comes in three sizes – Ultra, Pro, and Nano – each designed for specific levels of complexity and tasks.
Gemini Ultra: Intended for highly complex tasks, currently in a trial phase with select users.
Gemini Pro: Available in Bard for general users, offering advanced reasoning and understanding, and accessible to developers via Google AI Studio or Google Cloud Vertex AI.
Gemini Nano: Focused on on-device tasks, already integrated into Pixel 8 Pro, and soon available to Android developers via AICore in Android 14.
Addressing Challenges of Hallucinations and Safety
Factuality and Hallucinations: While improvements have been made, Gemini, like other LLMs, is still prone to hallucinations. Google uses additional techniques in Bard to enhance response accuracy.
Safety Measures: Google emphasizes new protections for Gemini’s multimodal capabilities, conducting comprehensive safety evaluations, including bias and toxicity assessments.
Ongoing Safety Research: Google collaborates with external experts to stress-test models and identify potential risks in areas like cyber-offence and persuasion.
Hallucination: Asking a generative AI application for five examples of bicycle models that will fit in the back of your specific make of sport utility vehicle. If only three models exist, the GenAI application may still provide five — two of which are entirely fabricated.
Comparing Gemini and ChatGPT 4
Flexibility and Capabilities: Gemini appears more versatile than GPT4, especially with its video processing and offline functionality.
Accessibility and Cost: Unlike the paid-access ChatGPT4, Gemini is currently free to use, potentially giving it a broader user base.
At the COP28 climate summit on November 6, 63 countries, including the US, Canada, and Kenya, signed the world’s first pledge to reduce cooling emissions.
Global Cooling Pledge
Term: This pledge aims to cut cooling emissions by at least 68% by 2050, addressing a significant source of greenhouse gases.
Current Contribution to Global Emissions: Cooling emissions, primarily from refrigerants and cooling energy, currently constitute 7% of global greenhouse gases.
Projected Increase: These emissions are expected to triple by 2050 due to rising global temperatures and increased demand for cooling appliances like ACs and refrigerators.
Role of Refrigerants in Global Warming
Transition from CFCs to HFCs and HCFCs: Initially, chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) were used in cooling appliances but were phased out by the 1987 Montreal Protocol due to ozone depletion concerns. They were replaced by hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs) and hydrochlorofluorocarbons (HCFCs).
Greenhouse Gas Potency: Although HFCs and HCFCs don’t harm the ozone layer, they are potent greenhouse gases, with some forms like HFC-134a having a global warming potential 3,400 times that of CO2.
Sources and Effects of HFC and HCFC Emissions
Leakage from Appliances: These gases often leak from damaged appliances or car air conditioning systems, especially at the end of their life cycle.
Contribution to Warming: The leakage of these gases contributes significantly to global warming, with the Climate and Clean Air Coalition (CCAC) highlighting their potency.
Challenge of Cooling Energy
Electricity for Cooling: A significant portion of cooling emissions comes from the electricity used to power cooling appliances.
Fossil Fuel Dependence: Much of this electricity is generated from fossil fuels, particularly in developing countries, contributing to climate change.
Vicious Cycle of Cooling Demand and Global Warming
Feedback Loop: Rising global temperatures increase the demand for cooling, which in turn contributes to more warming.
Growing Cooling Device Market: The number of cooling devices is expected to rise from 3.6 billion to 9.5 billion by 2050, with a potential need for 14 billion devices if cooling access is expanded globally.
Solutions and Strategies
Kigali Amendment to the Montreal Protocol: Over 150 countries agreed in 2016 to reduce HFC consumption by 80% by 2047, potentially avoiding over 0.4 degrees Celsius of global warming by 2100.
Promoting Climate-Friendly Refrigerants: The use of natural refrigerants with lower or zero global warming potential is being encouraged.
Proper Disposal and Management: Effective management and disposal of refrigerants could significantly reduce CO2 emissions.
Alternative Cooling Methods: Focusing on building designs that reduce the need for air conditioners, such as improved insulation and ventilation, is crucial.
Conclusion
The Global Cooling Pledge represents a significant step in addressing a key contributor to climate change.
This initiative underscores the need for global cooperation in combating the escalating challenges posed by climate change.
The Supreme Court of India released a video in 10 Indian languages, commemorating the 50th anniversary of the Kesavananda Bharati judgment delivered on April 24, 1973.
The Kesavananda Bharati vs. State of Kerala case is a cornerstone in Indian constitutional law, redefining the relationship between Parliament and the Constitution.
Kesavananda Bharati Case (1973)
Basic Structure Doctrine: The judgment introduced the basic structure doctrine, asserting that the Constitution has an inherent framework that cannot be altered by parliamentary amendments.
7-6 Decision: The Supreme Court, in a narrow decision, established its authority to invalidate constitutional amendments violating this basic structure.
Key Outcomes:
Limitation on Parliamentary Power: The doctrine restricts Parliament’s ability to amend key constitutional features like the separation of powers.
Judicial Review Reinforcement: It built upon the Golaknath v. State of Punjab case, allowing for the review of amendments affecting the Constitution’s basic structure.
Article 31-C and Judicial Review: The Court upheld the constitutionality of Article 31-C’s first provision, stating that amendments implementing Directive Principles, which do not disturb the basic structure, are not subject to judicial review.
Criticism of the Basic Structure Doctrine
Dilution of Parliamentary Powers: Critics argue that the doctrine undermines parliamentary sovereignty and disrupts the separation of powers.
Ambiguity Concerns: The doctrine’s perceived vagueness and subjectivity in judicial review have also been points of contention.
Landmark Cases Involving the Doctrine
Indira Gandhi v Raj Narain (1975): The Court applied the Kesavananda doctrine to strike down the 39th Amendment, which sought to immunize the elections of top officials from judicial scrutiny.
Minerva Mills Ltd vs. Union of India (1980): The Court invalidated a clause in Article 368, asserting that Parliament’s constituent power had no limitations.
P Sambamurthy v State of Andhra Pradesh (1986): The Court struck down part of the 32nd Amendment related to the establishment of an Administrative Tribunal in Andhra Pradesh.
L Chandra Kumar v Union of India (1997): The Court nullified a portion of the 42nd Amendment that established administrative tribunals and excluded High Court judicial review.
Significance of the Judgment and the Doctrine
Empowerment of Judicial Review: The doctrine underpins the judiciary’s authority to review and potentially override constitutional amendments by Parliament.
Clarification of Article 368: It distinguishes Article 368 as a procedural mechanism for amendment, not a power to alter the Constitution’s core or basic structure.
Harmony with Legislative Authority: Justice Shastri emphasized that judicial review is a constitutional duty, not an attempt to undermine legislative power.
Checks and Balances System: The Kesavananda Bharati verdict underscored that judicial review serves as a check and balance, ensuring constitutional functionaries remain within their prescribed limits.
In the last 3 years, a lot of things have changed about UPSC-CSE
This includes Exam Patterns & trend, Prelims, CSAT, Mains, and Preparation strategy
Standard resources and mocks can’t make you feel prepared anymore
Now, Every ranker who qualifies Mains crafts a process for it, painstakingly
Civilsdaily Masterclasses allow you to access the real work from those who have done it before
All rankers built their own preparation system. What’s stopping you?
Never start from scratch on your UPSC preparation
Start like a Topper.
Read what AIR 22, Pavandatta, IAS has to say about his UPSC experience
“I genuinely believe std. resources and mock tests are not enough now to get a rank in UPSC CSE.
And with less than 6 months to go for UPSC Prelims 2024 one has to sit down and think about the overall preparation strategy and how he/she is going to approach the exam.
Now you need to define the exact plan.
This thinking gives you an edge over others in exam. You become relaxed and confident throughout the journey which is otherwise filled with lots of daily anxiety, fear and uncertainty.
And this Sunday, I am coming to help you create your own preparation plan especially if you are a beginner, you must attend this.
My masterclass will be a reality check on modern-day UPSC prep. Not just my book list and strategy but also my inputs on your current strategy shared with you over our private Zoom meeting.”
Attend Masterclass by AIR 22 Pavandatta, IAS for FREE
By the end, you’ll have razor-sharp clarity and a clear roadmap for approaching and qualifying your UPSC exam with confidence and near-perfect certainty.
Pavandatta, IAS, UPSC CSE 2022
Registration open! Join now to attend the masterclass for FREE
(Don’t wait—the next masterclass won’t be until Feb 23)
These masterclasses are packed with value. They are conducted in private with a closed community. We rarely open these masterclasses for everyone for free. This time we are keeping it for 300 seats only.
Fee:
Special Access (extra 15 min with Ranker) – Free (only for first 100 registrations, register before 9th Dec)
Early Access – Rs. 299 (for the next 100 registrations, register before 10th Dec, 5 PM)
Late Access – Rs. 499 (for last 100 registrations, register before 10th Dec, Post 5 PM)
The Centre has taken significant steps to increase domestic sugar availability, including banning sugar exports and restricting the diversion of sugar for ethanol production.
On December 7, the Ministry of Consumer Affairs, Food and Public Distribution directed mills and distilleries not to use sugarcane juice/syrup for ethanol production.
Ethanol Blended Petrol (EBP) Programme
Programme’s Success: The EBP programme, a key achievement of the government, has seen ethanol blending with petrol increase from 1.6% in 2013-14 to 11.8% in 2022-23.
Feedstock Diversification: The success is attributed to diversifying feedstocks, including C-heavy molasses, B-heavy molasses, sugarcane juice/syrup, and grains.
Ethanol Production from Different Feedstocks
C-heavy Molasses: Traditionally used for ethanol production, yielding 220-225 litres of ethanol per tonne.
B-heavy Molasses: Provides higher ethanol yield (290-320 litres per tonne) compared to C-heavy molasses.
Direct Fermentation of Sugarcane: Fermenting the entire sugarcane without sugar extraction yields 80-81 litres of ethanol per tonne.
Centre’s Ethanol Blending Scheme: Food vs. Fuel Debate
Increased Ethanol Production Post-2017: The use of B-heavy molasses and sugarcane juice/syrup, along with new substrates like surplus rice, broken grains, and maize, boosted ethanol production.
Differential Pricing Policy: The government incentivized ethanol production from non-C-heavy molasses feedstocks with higher prices.
Impact on Industry: Companies like Triveni Engineering & Industries Ltd (TEIL) adapted to multiple feedstocks, including grain during the off-season.
Challenges and Setbacks for the Industry
Directive’s Impact: The December 7 directive is a setback, especially for companies with capacities to produce ethanol from cane juice/syrup.
Tender for Ethanol Supply: The OMCs’ tender for 825 crore litres of ethanol for 2023-24 might be affected, particularly the 135 crore litres from sugarcane juice/syrup.
Uncertainty in Pricing: The Centre has not announced prices for various ethanol feedstocks for 2023-24, despite the ethanol supply year aligning closer to the sugar year.
Sugar Supply Concerns and Policy Implications
Low Sugar Stocks: The 2022-23 sugar year ended with low stocks, prompting the government to prioritize domestic sugar supply.
Uncertain Production Forecasts: The National Federation of Cooperative Sugar Factories predicts a decrease in sugar production for 2023-24.
Government’s Prioritization: The latest decisions reflect the government’s focus on domestic supply and consumer needs over exports and fuel production.
Conclusion
Shift in Government Policy: The Centre’s recent actions indicate a shift towards prioritizing domestic sugar availability over ethanol production.
Broader Implications: These decisions impact both the sugar and ethanol industries, reflecting the complex balance between food security and renewable energy initiatives.
The article talks about how historians divided history into ancient, medieval, and modern times, mostly influenced by European ideas. It questions these divisions and suggests we rethink history as a continuous story. The key point is that there isn’t just one way to be “modern,” and we should consider different perspectives in understanding history.
Key Highlights:
The article critiques the conventional historical periodization of ancient, medieval, and modern eras, tracing its origins to European concepts.
It explores the imposition of this triad on global history through colonialism and challenges the Eurocentric narrative.
The author questions the dichotomies inherent in periodization, such as change versus continuity and stages of development.
The notion of modernity is central to periodization, with the article highlighting the evolving understanding of “modernities” in contemporary discourse.
The transformation from viewing modernity as an objective reality to a subjective, context-specific concept is emphasized.
Key Challenges:
The article confronts the challenge of reevaluating historical narratives deeply entrenched in Eurocentrism.
It challenges the dichotomous framework of periodization, urging historians to consider continuity within apparent changes.
The author grapples with the resistance to viewing history as a universal entity, urging a shift from fragmented tranches to a continual process.
Key Terms:
Periodization: Dividing history into distinct periods for analysis and understanding.
Modernity: The quality or condition of being modern; contemporary social and cultural features.
Eurocentrism: The dominance or undue focus on European culture, history, and values.
Key Phrases:
“Theft of History”: Refers to the imposition of European historical concepts on non-European societies through colonial power dynamics.
“Dark Age”: The Eurocentric portrayal of the medieval period as a time of irrationality, regression, and superstition.
“Modernities”: Acknowledges the diverse and context-specific manifestations of modernity in different regions.
Key Quotes:
“The modern world that we inhabit was thus essentially the West’s creation.”
“Modernity that had for long been accepted as an objective reality ‘out there’… has become subjective in each variant context.”
“This calls for the treatment of history as a universal entity of which regions form constituents.”
Key Statements:
The triad of ancient, medieval, and modern periods originated in Europe and was imposed globally through colonialism.
The article challenges the dichotomies of periodization and urges a reconsideration of history as a continual process.
The evolving understanding of modernity reflects a shift from a singular, Eurocentric perspective to recognizing diverse “modernities.”
Key Examples and References:
Reference to James Mill introducing the triad in Indian history to legitimize British rule.
Mention of Jack Goody’s concept of “The Theft of History” in the unequal power relationship between Europe and its colonies.
Key Facts and Data:
The triad of ancient, medieval, and modern periodization originated in Europe in the 16th-17th centuries.
The article emphasizes the need to reconsider history as a universal entity, acknowledging contributions from all civilizations.
Critical Analysis:
The article critically examines the Eurocentric biases embedded in historical periodization.
It challenges the binary thinking of periodization and encourages a nuanced understanding of historical processes.
The evolving nature of the concept of modernity is analyzed, highlighting its subjectivity in diverse contexts.
Way Forward:
The article suggests a shift from fragmented tranches to a more holistic and continual approach to history.
Encourages historians to explore emerging areas of research such as climate, planetary history, and reevaluation of pre-history and archaeology.
Calls for a more inclusive and diverse narrative that recognizes the contributions of all societies to the world’s historical development.
The article celebrates the infusion of wit and humor in parliamentary debates, highlighting instances of playful banter among politicians. It emphasizes the positive impact of humor in diffusing tension and fostering a lighter atmosphere in the political arena. The ironic touch is noted as the article points out the absence of a dedicated “Wit and Humour” page on the Rajya Sabha website.
Key Highlights:
Introduction: The article explores the positive impact of humor in parliamentary debates, emphasizing recent instances of wit in economic discussions.
Historical Perspective: Various anecdotes showcase the witty exchanges among prominent politicians, such as Piloo Mody, Madhavrao Scindia, and Ram Manohar Lohia.
Current Scenario: The article humorously notes the absence of a dedicated “Wit and Humour” page on the Rajya Sabha website, highlighting an ironic aspect of parliamentary proceedings.
Key Terms:
Parliamentary debates
Wit and humour
Playful banter
Political discourse
Rajya Sabha
Economic parameters
Key Phrases:
“State of the country’s economy”
“Friendly banter”
“Cutthroat political colosseum”
“Bring back some wit”
“Lighter side of political debates”
“Positive impact of humor”
“Diffusing tension”
“Ironic touch”
Key Quotes:
“It is because you had a good governor for three years.” – Chairman of the House
“Let me confirm, sir, that is the only reason all this (progress) happened in Bengal.” – Response to the Chairman’s remark
“‘Wit and Humour’ page on the Rajya Sabha website reads ‘Feature under Development.’”
Anecdotes:
Piloo Mody’s witty response to disagreeing with a minister’s speech.
Madhavrao Scindia’s comment on the Janata government’s performance.
Ram Manohar Lohia’s anecdote about Nehru’s grandfather being a chaprasi in the Mughal court.
Mahavir Tyagi’s humorous remark on Nehru’s statement about Aksai Chin.
Key Statements:
“In the cutthroat political colosseum, let’s bring back some wit into Parliamentary debates.”
“Nothing like friendly banter to cool off a heated exchange.”
Key Examples and References:
Instances of witty exchanges involving Piloo Mody, Madhavrao Scindia, Ram Manohar Lohia, Mahavir Tyagi, and others.
The absence of a dedicated “Wit and Humour” page on the Rajya Sabha website.
Critical Analysis:
While the article positively highlights the role of humor, a more critical analysis could explore potential drawbacks or criticisms associated with the use of wit in parliamentary discussions.
Way Forward:
Encourage more friendly banter and wit in parliamentary discussions to foster a congenial atmosphere.
Consider developing a dedicated “Wit and Humour” page on parliamentary websites to showcase the lighter side of politics.
Conduct a more in-depth analysis of the impact of humor on political discourse, addressing potential challenges or criticisms.
The central idea revolves around the challenges in India’s neighborhood, marked by politically anti-India regimes, China’s growing influence, and a changing geopolitical landscape. The dilemmas stem from a shift in power dynamics, policy stances, and mistaken assumptions, necessitating a realistic approach, proactive diplomacy, and addressing workforce shortages for effective foreign policy implementation.
Key Highlights:
Neighbourhood Challenges: The Achilles heel of Indian foreign policy lies in its neighbourhood, posing three types of dilemmas: politically anti-India regimes, structural challenges from Beijing’s growing influence, and the overarching geopolitical architecture.
China’s Rising Influence: China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) and strategic outreach in South Asia present challenges, making India geopolitically vulnerable within an unfriendly neighbourhood.
Causes of Dilemmas: Regional geopolitical architecture, China’s ascendance, normative approach vs. China’s non-normative stance, and the shift from resident to non-resident power dynamics contribute to India’s dilemmas.
Policy Stance Dilemma: India’s status quo bias in dealing with regional politics and a focus on power centers contribute to path-dependencies and sometimes alienate other centers of power or opposition leaders.
Mistaken Assumptions: Assumptions that South Asia minus Pakistan would align with Indian geopolitical reasoning and that cultural connections would ensure better relations have proven inaccurate.
Key Challenges:
Changing Balance of Power: India must adapt to the changed balance of power in Southern Asia, acknowledging China’s emergence as a serious contender for regional primacy.
Involvement of External Actors: Proactively involving friendly external actors in the region is crucial to prevent it from becoming Sino-centric.
Flexible Diplomacy: Indian diplomacy needs to be flexible, engaging multiple actors in each neighboring country and focusing on lessening anti-India attitudes rather than solely dealing with those in power.
Diplomatic Workforce Shortage: The shortage of diplomats is a critical challenge, hindering India’s ability to implement foreign policy effectively and respond to global opportunities or crises.
Key Quotes:
“India’s neighbours and periphery are China’s too, even if we do not like it.”
“Dealing with whoever is in power is a good policy, but engaging only those in power is a bad policy.”
Critical Analysis:
India faces complex geopolitical challenges in its neighborhood, requiring a pragmatic approach to the changed power dynamics. The need for a mental switch, proactive diplomacy, and addressing workforce shortages emerges as critical. The evolving scenario necessitates a shift from traditional assumptions and a more nuanced engagement strategy.
Way Forward:
Realistic Framing: India should acknowledge the fundamental changes in the regional balance of power and operate within the framework of a new geopolitical reality.
External Actor Engagement: Actively involve friendly external actors to counterbalance China’s influence in the region.
Flexible Diplomacy: Adopt a flexible diplomatic approach that engages with multiple actors in neighboring countries, focusing on reducing anti-India sentiments.
Diplomatic Workforce Enhancement: Address the shortage of diplomats by significantly enhancing India’s diplomatic workforce to effectively implement foreign policy objectives.
Garba, a traditional dance form from Gujarat, was included in the UNESCO list of Intangible Cultural Heritage.
This recognition makes Garba the 15th cultural item from India to be featured on the UNESCO list, following Kolkata’s Durga Puja, which was added two years ago.
About Garba
What is it? Garba is a traditional dance form from Gujarat, India, primarily performed during the Navratri festival to worship the Hindu goddess Durga.
Origins and Meaning: The term “Garba” comes from “Garbha” (womb) and “Deep” (lamp). The dance is performed around a central lamp or a representation of the Goddess, symbolizing life, death, and rebirth.
Dance Style: Garba is characterized by energetic, circular movements, clapping hands, and intricate footwork, reflecting the cyclical nature of life.
Music and Instruments: The dance is accompanied by rhythmic music, traditionally using instruments like the dhol (drum), harmonium, and flute, with modern adaptations including electronic instruments.
Traditional Attire: Women wear a chaniya choli (a colorful, embroidered skirt set) and men don a kediyu and dhoti or pajama, often embellished with mirrors and embroidery.
Dandiya Raas Association: Garba is often followed by Dandiya Raas, another dance form using sticks (dandiyas), especially after the Aarti (worship ritual).
Inclusivity and Community Aspect: The dance is inclusive, attracting people of all ages and backgrounds, and emphasizing community participation.
About UNESCO Intangible Cultural Heritage (ICH)
ICH means the practices, representations, expressions, knowledge, skills – as well as the instruments, objects, artefacts and cultural spaces associated with them that communities, groups and, in some cases, individuals recognize as a part of their cultural heritage.
Furthermore, its importance is not in the cultural manifestation itself, but in the wealth of knowledge, know-how and skills that are transmitted from one generation to the next.
The adoption of the Convention for the Safeguarding of the ICH by the General Conference of UNESCO in 2003 was a crucial step towards preserving intangible heritage.
UNESCO’s list of Intangible Cultural Heritage of Humanity was established in the year 2008.
Criteria for the selection
There are three criteria for an intangible cultural heritage to be inscribed in the United Nations list.
The entity must-
be recognized by communities, groups and, in some cases, individuals as part of their cultural heritage,
be transmitted from generation to generation and be constantly recreated by communities and groups in response to their environment, their interaction with nature and their history and
provide them with a sense of identity and continuity, thus promoting respect for cultural diversity and human creativity
India’s ICH on the UNESCO list
Sangeet Natak Akademi is the nodal organisation which looks after this function, and files nominations of intangible cultural entities from India, for evaluation by the international body.
ICG from India include Kolkata’s Durga Puja (2021), Kumbh Mela (2017), Navroz (2016), Yoga (2016), traditional brass and copper craft of utensil-making among coppersmiths of Punjab (2014), Sankirtana, a ritual musical performance of Manipur (2013), and the Buddhist chanting of Ladakh (2012).
Before 2011, the list included Chhau dance, Kalbelia folk songs and dance of Rajasthan, and Mudiyettu, a dance drama from Kerala (2010), Ramman, a religious festival and theatre performance of Garhwal in the Himalayas (2009), and Kutiyattam or Sanskrit theatre, and Vedic chanting (2008).
Ramlila, a traditional performance of Ramayana, was also included in 2008.
.png)
