💥Join UPSC 2027,2028 Mentorship (August Batch) + XFactor Notes & Microthemes PDF
Talk to Mentor

Civilsdaily

Login

Subject: Bonds

  • Government explores routing gold monetisation through jewellers after bank scheme’s weak record

    Why in the News

    The government is in talks with jewellers on a gold monetisation route in which jewellers accept household gold and the deposit is held in a demat account, with interest paid on the value deposited. The bank based Gold Monetisation Scheme of 2015 mobilised only 38 tonnes by March 2025 against household holdings placed well upwards of 20,000 tonnes, so the redesign turns on who households trust with their gold rather than on the return offered.

    How would the proposed jeweller led gold monetisation route work?

    1. Point of deposit: A depositor would take physical gold to the nearest jeweller rather than to a bank branch.
    2. Record of holding: The scheme would be implemented through demat accounts, in the same way as shares, and the gold deposit would be reflected in the depositor’s demat account.
    3. Return to the depositor: The depositor would earn interest on the value of the gold deposited.
    4. Role of the jeweller: Jewellers would assume a key role in mobilising gold, becoming the contact point that banks occupy in the existing scheme.
    5. Stage of the proposal: Discussions with large industry players have been constructive and a scheme could be announced soon.

    What is a demat account?

    1. Definition: A dematerialised, or demat, account holds securities in electronic form with a depository, removing the need for a physical certificate.
    2. Application here: Holding a gold deposit in a demat account makes the claim transferable and tradable in electronic form, which physical gold in a bank vault is not.

    Why is the government revisiting gold monetisation now?

    1. Currency pressure: The exchange rate is under pressure from several factors at once.
    2. Fuel prices: Elevated fuel prices following the West Asia crisis have widened the import bill.
    3. Equity market sentiment: Investor concerns about the domestic stock market have weighed on capital inflows.
    4. Gold imports: Elevated gold imports are the third source of pressure, with imports reaching $71.98 billion in 2025-26 against about $35.02 billion in 2022-23, per Ministry of Commerce and Industry data.
    5. Industry signal: The chairman of the All India Gems and Jewellery Domestic Council stated that the government has communicated that it is serious about the proposal and has assured implementation as swiftly as it can be done.

    What did the bank based scheme of 2015 achieve?

    1. Mobilisation record: The scheme launched in 2015 mobilised just 38 tonnes of gold by March 2025, according to government data.
    2. Scale of the untapped stock: There is no official estimate of gold held by Indian households, and experts place the figure significantly upwards of 20,000 tonnes.
    3. The identified failure point: Families are more comfortable dealing with their family jewellers on matters concerning gold and silver, and that comfort is missing when banks play that role.
    4. The stated design change: The big shift in the current proposal is moving the collection point beyond banks, per the President of the India Bullion and Jewellers Association.

    Components of the Gold Monetisation Scheme, 2015, along the deposit lifecycle

    Component (lifecycle stage)Intervention and official termsPrimary stakeholder served
    Collection and Purity Testing Centre (input and assaying)Depositor’s raw gold is tested for purity at a Bureau of Indian Standards certified centre and converted into a standard equivalent before the deposit is acceptedHousehold depositor
    Short Term Bank Deposit (financing, short tenure)Tenure of 1 to 3 years, accepted by the bank on its own account, with the interest rate decided by the bank itselfDepositor and the accepting bank
    Medium Term Government Deposit (financing, medium tenure)Tenure of 5 to 7 years, accepted by banks on behalf of the Central government, at an interest rate of 2.25 percent per annumCentral government and the depositor
    Long Term Government Deposit (financing, long tenure)Tenure of 12 to 15 years, accepted on behalf of the Central government, at an interest rate of 2.50 percent per annumCentral government and the depositor
    Refinery and deployment (use of mobilised gold)Mobilised gold is refined and lent to jewellers as metal loans or used to reduce fresh import demandJewellery manufacturers and the external account
    Tax treatment (redemption)Deposits are exempt from capital gains tax, wealth tax and income tax on the interest and the appreciationHousehold depositor
    Current status of the componentsThe medium and long term government deposit components were discontinued from 26 March 2025, leaving only the short term bank deposit at the discretion of banksCentral government

    What would monetisation at scale do for the economy?

    1. Value of a partial mobilisation: Monetising just 10 percent of the gold held would be worth around $400 billion, according to a part time member of the Economic Advisory Council to the Prime Minister (EAC-PM).
    2. Comparison with foreign capital: India’s gross foreign direct investment is about $80 billion, so that gold would be equivalent to five years of foreign direct investment inflows.
    3. External account effect: Locked up gold, once monetised, can make India a trade account surplus nation.
    4. Consumption and investment effect: The change would increase domestic consumption and force companies to invest more.
    5. Savings channel: Investment depends on either domestic or global savings, and adding frozen domestic savings to liquid savings alongside continuing foreign capital would make a much larger pool available for investment.

    Why does routing gold through jewellers solve one problem and create another?

    1. The trust problem is real: Households deal with a family jeweller across generations, and the bank counter never acquired that standing, which is the single clearest explanation for 38 tonnes in ten years.
    2. The proposal is described as a win-win only in theory: The depositor earns interest and the system unlocks idle metal, and both outcomes depend on the intermediary honouring the deposit.
    3. Supervision moves to a lightly regulated node: A bank accepting a deposit is a regulated entity under banking law, and a jeweller accepting gold is not supervised in the same way.
    4. Purity assessment shifts: In the bank route, purity is established at a certified Collection and Purity Testing Centre, and a jeweller led route puts assaying and the customer relationship in the same hands.
    5. The demat layer is the safeguard being relied on: Holding the claim electronically creates a record of the deposit, and it does not by itself secure the physical metal held by the collecting jeweller.

    Challenges to gold monetisation in India

    1. Sentimental and social value of gold: Household gold is largely ornamental and passed down, so melting it for a deposit is resisted regardless of the interest offered. e.g. wedding jewellery in most Indian households is treated as inalienable rather than as a financial asset.
    2. Competing use as loan collateral: Households increasingly pledge gold rather than deposit it, since a loan preserves ownership of the ornament. e.g. gold backed loans reached about Rs 5.4 lakh crore by June 2026.
    3. Low return relative to price appreciation: Interest of a little over two percent is negligible against expected gold price gains. e.g. the Medium Term Government Deposit paid 2.25 percent while gold prices rose several fold over the scheme’s life.
    4. Fear of tax scrutiny: Depositing undeclared gold exposes the holder to questions on the source of the holding. e.g. income tax rules on unexplained investments deter deposits of inherited and undocumented holdings.
    5. Thin collection infrastructure: The number of certified collection and purity testing centres and refiners is small relative to the geography. e.g. large parts of rural India have no Bureau of Indian Standards certified assaying centre within reach.
    6. Loss of the ornament itself: The deposit requires the ornament to be melted into standard gold, which is irreversible. e.g. antique and regionally distinctive designs cannot be recovered once assayed and melted.
    7. Bank incentive problem: Banks earn little from accepting and deploying gold deposits, so branch level effort has been minimal. e.g. the medium and long term components were discontinued from 26 March 2025 after weak uptake.

    Conclusion

    The government is in talks with jewellers on a monetisation route in which household gold is deposited with a jeweller, held in a demat account and paid interest, after the bank based scheme of 2015 mobilised only 38 tonnes by March 2025 against holdings placed above 20,000 tonnes. The redesign correctly identifies trust in the family jeweller, rather than the return on the deposit, as the binding constraint, and it moves the collection point to an intermediary that is not supervised like a bank. Discussions are described as constructive and a scheme could be announced soon; the source states no announcement date.

    Foundational Context: Gold in India’s Economy

    1. Consumption scale: India is among the world’s two largest consumers of gold, alongside China, and imports almost all the gold it consumes.
    2. Household stock: Indian households are estimated to hold upwards of 20,000 tonnes of gold, which is larger than the official reserves of most central banks.
    3. External account weight: Gold is consistently among the top items in India’s import bill after crude oil, and gold imports reached $71.98 billion in 2025-26.
    4. Duty sensitivity: Import duty changes on gold move the split between formal imports and smuggling, which is why duty rates are treated as a customs enforcement issue as much as a revenue one.
    5. Financialisation objective: Public policy on gold has one consistent aim, which is to shift household savings out of physical metal into financial instruments backed by gold.

    Laws and Rules Governing Gold in India

    1. Bureau of Indian Standards Act, 2016: Provides the statutory basis for standardisation and for mandatory hallmarking of precious metal articles.
    2. Hallmarking Regulations and the HUID: Require every hallmarked gold article to carry a six digit alphanumeric unique identification number, traceable to the certified hallmarking centre.
    3. Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992: Empowers the Central government to set the import policy for gold, including the channels and agencies through which it may be imported.
    4. Customs Act, 1962 and the Customs Tariff Act, 1975: Provide for the levy of import duty on gold and for confiscation and penalty in cases of smuggling and misdeclaration.
    5. Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999: Governs the permissible modes of gold import and the treatment of gold in cross border transactions.
    6. Securities and Exchange Board of India (Vault Managers) Regulations, 2021: Regulate the vault managers who store the underlying gold against Electronic Gold Receipts traded on stock exchanges.
    7. Gold (Control) Act, 1968: Restricted private holding of gold bullion and was repealed in 1990, which is what allowed the later deposit and monetisation schemes to be built.
    8. Income-tax Act, 1961: Governs the treatment of unexplained investments and the tax exemptions specifically extended to deposits under the Gold Monetisation Scheme.

    “[2016] What is/are the purpose/purposes of Government’s ‘Sovereign Gold Bond Scheme’ and ‘Gold Monetization Scheme’?
    1. To bring the idle gold lying with Indian households into the economy.
    2. To promote FDI in the gold and jewellery sector
    3. To reduce India’s dependence on gold imports
    Select the correct answer using the code given below.
    (a) 1 only
    (b) 2 and 3 only
    (c) 1 and 3 only
    (d) 1, 2 and 3

  • Why households pledge gold instead of selling it

    Why in the News

    India’s gold market is witnessing a structural shift as investment demand and gold backed loans grow rapidly, while jewellery demand declines. The trend has also highlighted the limited success of the Gold Monetisation Scheme (GMS), 2015 in mobilising idle household gold.

    What is the Gold Monetisation Scheme (GMS), 2015?

    • Objective: Mobilise idle gold held by households and institutions into the formal financial system.
    • Mechanism: Individuals and institutions deposit physical gold with authorised banks and earn interest on the deposits.
    • Challenges: Limited participation due to taxation concerns, sentimental attachment to gold and procedural complexities.

    How is India’s gold demand changing?

    • Overall Demand: Total gold demand increased 2% year on year to 282 tonnes in the first half of the year.
    • Jewellery Demand: Fell 17.1% to 141.2 tonnes, among the weakest first quarter levels since 2000.
    • ETF Investment: Gold Exchange Traded Funds (ETFs) recorded a net inflow of 20 tonnes in the first quarter.
    • Bars and Coins: Demand rose 21.3% in volume and 105.5% in value during the first half of FY27.
    • Price Rise: Domestic gold prices have increased more than fivefold over the past decade.

    Why are households pledging gold instead of selling it?

    • Collateral Preference: Households increasingly use gold as collateral for loans rather than selling it.
    • Gold Loan Growth: Outstanding gold loan portfolios reached about Rs 5.4 lakh crore by June 2026.
    • Retail Loans: Bank loans backed by pledged jewellery touched about Rs 4.3 lakh crore by February 2026.
    • Limited Recycling: Despite record high prices, households continue to retain gold, resulting in low recycled supply.
    • External Stability: Household gold holdings and central bank gold purchases have supported India’s external balance and moderated pressure on the rupee.

    What are the concerns?

    • Financial Stability: Rapid expansion of gold loans requires close regulatory monitoring.
    • RBI Measures: Borrowers must fully repay principal and interest before the same gold can be repledged.
    • Price Risk: A sharp decline in gold prices could affect lenders through lower collateral values.

    [2016] What is/are the purpose/purposes of Government’s ‘Sovereign Gold Bond Scheme’ and ‘Gold Monetization Scheme’?
    1. To bring the idle gold lying with Indian households into the economy.
    2. To promote FDI in the gold and jewellery sector.
    3. To reduce India’s dependence on gold imports.
    Select the correct answer using the code given below.
    (a) 1 only (b) 2 and 3 only (c) 1 and 3 only (d) 1, 2 and 3

  • Insurance regulator likely to tighten commission norms

    Why in the News?

    IRDAI is working on a disclosure framework and a possible commission cap for insurance intermediaries, using powers granted by the January 2026 amendment to the Insurance Act. The move exposes a tension between commission-driven competition for distribution access and policyholder protection, since insurers with largely similar products have long competed on payouts to intermediaries rather than on price. Gross commission outgo across the industry crossed Rs 1 lakh crore in FY25, with the commission expense ratio for non-life insurers rising from 6.21% to 6.86% in one year.

    What twin-track regulatory response has IRDAI designed for insurance intermediaries?

    1. Disclosure threshold: Intermediaries whose commission income exceeds a prescribed threshold must file detailed annual disclosures with the regulator.
    2. Scope of disclosure: Required disclosures cover commission earnings, related-party transactions, profits from operations, and dividend repatriation to promoters or parent entities.
    3. Public accountability mechanism: Intermediaries must publish this information on their own websites, not only file it with the regulator.
    4. Parallel price-control track: IRDAI is separately drafting a proposal to cap commission payouts by insurers to distributors.
    5. Legal basis: The commission cap is enabled by the January 2026 amendment to the Insurance Act, which for the first time empowered IRDAI to prescribe commission ceilings.
    6. Sectoral range today: In the non-life segment, commission to brokers currently ranges from 2.5% to 10%, illustrated by the example of a $20 billion fleet airline paying $30 million in annual premium.

    Why has commission-driven competition persisted despite calls for policyholder-centric conduct?

    1. Product homogeneity: Insurers offer products broadly similar in coverage and pricing, which removes price and product design as competitive levers.
    2. Commission as the substitute lever: Intermediaries decide which products to distribute based on commission structures and incentive payouts rather than product merit.
    3. Distribution-channel competition: Insurers compete for access to intermediaries, not for the end policyholder, inverting the intended direction of market discipline.
    4. Renewal-commission bias: Intermediaries favour products generating recurring renewal commissions, which skews recommendations toward insurer payout structures rather than policyholder need.
    5. Persistence of mis-selling: Mis-selling and under-cutting by insurers to secure business continue despite existing disclosure and conduct norms.
    6. Digital paradox: Digital platforms, web aggregators and insurtech firms lower customer acquisition costs and raise price transparency, yet this has intensified rather than reduced competition for distribution access.

    What does the scale of commission expenditure reveal about the distribution model?

    1. Cross-industry threshold breached: Total commission paid by 26 life and 28 non-life insurers crossed the Rs 1 lakh crore mark in FY25.
    2. Non-life sector breakdown: Public sector general insurers paid Rs 9,335 crore, private general insurers Rs 30,498 crore, standalone health insurers Rs 7,365 crore, and specialised insurers Rs 67 crore in commission for 2024-25.
    3. Non-life aggregate: These four segments cumulatively totalled Rs 47,266 crore in gross commission expense for the entire non-life insurance industry.
    4. Life insurance outlay: Life insurers paid Rs 60,800 crore in commission during 2024-25, exceeding the entire non-life industry’s commission outgo.
    5. Rising commission expense ratio: The commission expense ratio, measured as commission expenses as a percentage of premium, rose from 6.21% in 2023-24 to 6.86% in 2024-25 for non-life insurers.
    6. Direction of the trend: The ratio moved upward in the same year IRDAI issued its consultation paper, indicating the disclosure-stage proposal has not yet altered underlying commission behaviour.

    What precondition is missing for a commission cap to correct mis-selling rather than relocate it?

    1. Non-cash incentive channels: Insurers currently offer performance-linked incentives and other commercial benefits alongside commission, none of which a commission cap alone would touch.
    2. Undefined enforcement mechanism: The consultation paper details disclosure content but does not specify how breaches of a future commission ceiling would be monitored or penalised.
    3. Distribution-channel dependence unaddressed: A cap constrains payout levels but does not remove insurers’ underlying dependence on intermediaries to reach policyholders in a product-homogeneous market.
    4. Threshold design gap: The disclosure obligation applies only above a prescribed commission-income threshold, leaving intermediaries below that threshold outside the enhanced-disclosure regime.
    5. No linkage to policyholder outcomes: The proposed framework tracks intermediary earnings and related-party transactions but does not tie disclosure or caps to policyholder complaints or mis-selling data.

    Will a commission cap eliminate the incentive to mis-sell or merely shift it to non-commission channels?

    1. Incentive substitution risk: Insurers can replace capped commissions with performance-linked incentives, trips, or other non-cash benefits to retain intermediary loyalty.
    2. Disclosure without a cap has not worked: The consultation paper preceded the cap proposal by weeks, and the commission expense ratio still rose in the same reporting year.
    3. Cap without enforcement detail: IRDAI has not yet formally proposed a cap, and the reported draft carries no disclosed enforcement architecture.
    4. Underlying driver untouched: Product homogeneity, the root cause of commission-based competition, is not addressed by either disclosure or a cap.
    5. Segment disruption acknowledged: The article itself notes a commission cap “could disrupt the segment,” indicating the regulator anticipates displacement effects on distribution economics rather than a clean resolution.

    Conclusion

    IRDAI’s shift from disclosure norms to a commission cap signals that transparency alone has not corrected commission-driven mis-selling in a market where product homogeneity leaves commission as the primary competitive lever. Unless the cap is paired with enforcement against non-cash incentive substitutes, it risks displacing rather than eliminating the underlying incentive to compete for distribution access at the policyholder’s expense.

  • Consider the following statements

    Consider the following statements:

    Statement-I:
    If the United States of America (USA) were to default on its debt, holders of US Treasury Bonds will not be able to exercise their claims to receive payment.

    Statement-II:
    The USA Government debt is not backed by any hard assets, but only by the faith of the Government.

    Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?

  • Consider the following

    Consider the following:
    1. Exchange-Traded Funds (ETF)
    2. Motor vehicles
    3. Currency swap
    Which of the above is/are considered financial instruments?

  • Centre scraps capital gains, interest tax on FII govt bond investments to pull foreign funds

    Why in the News?

    The Union Government promulgated the Income-tax (Amendment) Ordinance, 2026, which received President Droupadi Murmu’s assent on June 5, 2026. The ordinance completely exempts Foreign Institutional Investors (FIIs) from capital gains tax and withholding tax on interest income earned from Indian government securities, effective from April 1, 2026. The move seeks to attract large foreign debt inflows, address a projected $50-60 billion Balance of Payments (BoP) gap, and support rupee stability amid weak portfolio and FDI inflows.

    How Has The Tax Treatment Of Foreign Investors Changed?

    Previous Tax Regime

    1. Long-Term Capital Gains Tax (LTCG): FIIs paid 12.5% tax on gains from bonds held for more than 12 months.
    2. Short-Term Capital Gains Tax (STCG): FIIs paid 30% tax on short-term gains.
    3. Withholding Tax: Foreign investors paid nearly 20% tax on interest income from government bonds.
    4. Global Comparison: India’s withholding tax was among the highest globally after the concessional 5% rate expired in 2023.
    5. Gross Taxation: Non-resident investors paid withholding tax on gross interest income and could not offset losses against past gains.

    New Tax Regime

    1. Capital Gains Exemption: The government has completely scrapped both Long-Term Capital Gains (LTCG) and Short-Term Capital Gains (STCG) taxes on investments made by FIIs in government bonds.
    2. Interest Income Exemption: The government has also scrapped the withholding tax (Tax Deducted at Source) that FIIs were required to pay on their interest income derived from government debt instruments/bonds.
    3. Coverage: Applies to investments through the General Route and Fully Accessible Route (FAR).
    4. Effective Date: Changes become effective from April 1, 2026 following Presidential assent to the ordinance amending the Income Tax Act, 2025.
    5. Institutional Coverage: Benefits extend to FIIs and the Bank for International Settlements (BIS).

    Why Is India Seeking Greater Foreign Debt Inflows?

    1. Balance of Payments Pressure
      1. BoP Deficit: India may face a $50-60 billion BoP deficit in FY27.
      2. External Financing Need: Sustained capital inflows are necessary to finance the deficit without exerting pressure on foreign exchange reserves.
    2. Rupee Stability
      1. Exchange Rate Stress: The rupee had nearly breached the ₹97 per US dollar level recently.
      2. Recent Recovery: Rupee strengthened from ₹95.79/$ on Thursday to ₹94.94/$ on Friday.
      3. Currency Support: Higher debt inflows increase foreign exchange supply and support currency stability.
    3. Weak Portfolio and FDI Flows
      1. Equity Outflows: FPIs have withdrawn approximately $28 billion from Indian equities in FY26.
      2. FDI Moderation: Net FDI inflows have weakened, increasing reliance on alternative capital sources.

    How Large Could The Potential Foreign Inflows Be?

    1. Expected Debt Inflows
      1. Axis Bank Estimate: Tax exemptions could attract $45-50 billion into government debt markets over the next two years.
      2. BoP Gap Financing: Such inflows could bridge a major portion of the projected external financing requirement.
    2. Untapped Market Potential
      1. Current Holdings: FIIs hold only ₹3.75 lakh crore.
      2. Total Market Size: Government securities outstanding amount to ₹112.42 lakh crore.
      3. Foreign Share: Foreign participation remains limited at 3.34%.
    3. Global Investor Appeal
      1. Tax Neutrality: Aligns India more closely with major sovereign bond markets.
      2. Yield Attraction: Indian government bonds offer relatively attractive yields compared to many developed markets.

    What Additional Measures Have Been Taken To Liberalize Government Bond Investments?

    1. Expansion Of Fully Accessible Route (FAR) Securities
      1. Coverage Expansion: RBI is considering inclusion of all new issuances of 15-year, 30-year and 40-year government bonds under FAR.
      2. Accessibility: Ensures unrestricted foreign investment in a larger segment of sovereign debt.
    2. Removal Of Investment Restrictions
      1. Short-Term Investment Limits: Proposed removal of caps on short-duration investments.
      2. Concentration Limits: Removal of concentration restrictions on FII investments.
      3. Individual Security Limits: Greater flexibility for investors across government securities.
    3. Complementary RBI Measures
      1. Overseas Borrowing: RBI eased norms for state-owned enterprises to borrow abroad.
      2. Foreign Currency Deposits: Banks allowed greater mobilization of foreign currency deposits.
      3. Objective: Strengthens overall foreign capital inflow architecture.

    How Can Greater Debt Inflows Benefit The Indian Economy?

    1. External Sector Stability
      1. BoP Financing: Ensures financing of current account and capital account gaps.
      2. Reserve Protection: Reduces pressure on foreign exchange reserves.
    2. Rupee Appreciation
      1. Forex Supply: Higher inflows increase dollar availability.
      2. Exchange Rate Support: Reduces depreciation pressures on the rupee.
    3. Bond Market Development
      1. Market Depth: Broadens investor base in government securities.
      2. Liquidity: Enhances trading activity and price discovery.
    4. Lower Borrowing Costs
      1. Demand Expansion: Increased demand for government bonds may lower yields over time.
      2. Fiscal Benefit: Reduces government borrowing costs.
    5. Global Financial Integration
      1. Market Confidence: Signals policy commitment to capital market reforms.
      2. International Participation: Improves India’s standing in global bond markets.

    What Risks And Concerns Remain?

    1. Dependence On Portfolio Flows
      1. Volatility Risk: Debt inflows can reverse quickly during global financial stress.
      2. External Vulnerability: Excessive reliance on foreign capital may increase exposure to global shocks.
    2. Revenue Implications
      1. Tax Foregone: Government sacrifices tax revenues to attract foreign investment.
      2. Cost-Benefit Question: Actual inflows must justify revenue losses.
    3. Monetary Management Challenges
      1. Liquidity Effects: Large inflows may complicate liquidity and exchange-rate management.
      2. Sterilization Costs: RBI may need intervention to manage excess forex inflows.
    4. Structural Constraints
      1. Investment Decisions: Tax incentives alone may not overcome concerns relating to regulations, global risk appetite, and geopolitical uncertainties.

    Conclusion

    Amid global economic uncertainty and pressure on India’s external sector, the reform seeks to attract foreign capital, support the rupee, and deepen the sovereign debt market. It aligns with India’s broader aspiration of becoming a $5 trillion economy and a globally integrated financial powerhouse while ensuring macroeconomic stability.

    PYQ Relevance

    [UPSC 2016] Justify the need for FDI for the development of the Indian economy. Why is there a gap between MOUs signed and actual FDIs? Suggest remedial steps for increasing actual FDIs in India

    Linkage: The PYQ examines policy measures undertaken by the government to attract foreign capital and strengthen investment inflows. The reform uses tax incentives to attract foreign capital and deepen India’s debt market.

  • With reference to ‘IFC Masala Bonds’, sometimes seen in the news, which of the statements given below is/are correct

    With reference to ‘IFC Masala Bonds’, sometimes seen in the news, which of the statements given below is/are correct?
    1. The International Finance Corporation, which offers these bonds, is an arm of the World Bank.
    2. They are the rupee-denominated bonds and are a source of debt financing for the public and private sector,
    Select the correct answer using the code given below.

  • What is/are the purpose/purposes of Government’s ‘Sovereign Gold Bond Scheme’ and ‘Gold Monetization Scheme’

    What is/are the purpose/purposes of Government’s ‘Sovereign Gold Bond Scheme’ and ‘Gold Monetization Scheme’?
    1. To bring the idle gold lying with Indian households into the economy.
    2. To promote FDI in the gold and jewellery sector
    3. To reduce India’s dependence on gold imports
    Select the correct answer using the code given below.

  • Indian Government Bond Yields are influenced by which of the following

    Indian Government Bond Yields are influenced by which of the following?
    1.Actions of the United States Federal Reserve
    2.Actions of the Reserve Bank of India
    3.Inflation and short-term interest rates
    Select the correct answer using the code given below:

  • With reference to the Indian economy, what are the advantages of “Inflation-Indexed Bonds (IIBs)”

    With reference to the Indian economy, what are the advantages of “Inflation-Indexed Bonds (IIBs)” ?
    1. Government can reduce the coupon rates on its borrowing by way of IIBs.
    2. IIBs provide protection to the investors from uncertainty regarding inflation.
    3. The interest received as well as capital gains on IIBs are not taxable.

    Which of the statements given above are correct ?