💥Join UPSC 2027,2028 Mentorship (July Batch) + XFactor Notes & Microthemes PDF
Talk to Mentor

Civilsdaily

Login

Subject: Post Independence

  • India’s foreign policy must look seaward

    Why in the News?

    Of the 14 Indians killed in West Asia conflict-related attacks since 28 February, at least eight were seafarers. This exposes how India’s foreign policy apparatus treats its roughly 3.2 lakh seafarers as a shipping matter until a crisis turns them into a consular emergency.

    Why does responsibility for an Indian seafarer’s safety become unclear at exactly the moment it matters most?

    1. A single jurisdictional authority: A seafarer may be recruited in Mumbai, hired by a Singapore-based company, placed on a ship flagged to Panama, carrying Kuwaiti oil, and attacked off Oman, leaving no single authority fully responsible.
    2. India’s consular system is organised by territory, but seafarers are not: A seafarer crosses multiple jurisdictions during a single voyage, and an Indian mission may not know a national is nearby until a ship is seized, abandoned, or attacked.
    3. The scale problem: India’s seafarer workforce stands at about 3.2 lakh (June 2025), nearly three times its size in 2014. This makes India the second largest supplier of seafarers globally after the Philippines, according to the 2026 Seafarer Workforce Report.
    4. Abandonment data confirms the gap is systemic: International Transport Workers’ Federation (ITF) data show 1,125 Indian seafarers were abandoned in 2025. This was the highest for any country, with responsibility split among the flag state, port authority, shipowner, insurer, and Indian mission.

    What has the government actually done, and where does it fall short?

    1. The Seafarer First response: Introduced after the recent West Asia strikes, it includes a dashboard tracking ships, threats, and crew welfare, along with a liaison officer for each affected family.
    2. A targeted precaution: On 15 July, the government advised shipowners, managers, and recruitment agencies to avoid deploying Indian seafarers on vessels transiting the Strait of Hormuz until further orders.
    3. An existing but narrow enforcement tool: The Directorate General of Shipping (DGS) order of 14 May bars licensed recruitment agencies from placing seafarers on 366 vessels linked to crew abandonment, unless compliance conditions are met. However, seafarers currently have to search for the list themselves before accepting employment.
    4. The dashboard’s structural limit: It can track ships, but cannot compel a flag state or shipowner to act, nor secure access to a detained seafarer.

    What would closing the gap actually require?

    1. A standing maritime consular protocol: Clearly defining institutional responsibility from the moment a distress signal is received, instead of responding only after a crisis unfolds.
    2. Designated port-level officers: Indian missions at major shipping hubs should have officers familiar with port authorities, hospitals, insurers, and legal systems before emergencies arise.
    3. Multilateral pressure on flag states: India, the Philippines, and Indonesia could jointly push through the International Maritime Organization (IMO) and the International Labour Organization (ILO) for stronger standards on legal assistance and repatriation.
    4. A seafarer’s right to know before signing: Mandatory disclosure of a vessel’s true ownership, sanctions status, insurance validity, and history of crew abandonment, along with the right to refuse deployment to high-risk regions without penalty.

    Conclusion

    India’s maritime ambitions extend beyond ports, shipping, and naval power. Protecting the country’s 3.2 lakh seafarers requires a permanent maritime consular framework, stronger international cooperation, and greater legal safeguards. India’s responsibility to its citizens should not end with a foreign flag on the vessel.

    Back2Basics

    1. Flag of Convenience (FoC): The practice of registering a merchant ship in a country other than that of its owners to benefit from lower taxes or lighter regulations, often complicating legal accountability for crew welfare.
    2. Maritime Labour Convention (MLC), 2006: An International Labour Organization (ILO) convention that establishes minimum global standards for seafarers’ working and living conditions, including wages, health protection, and repatriation rights.

    PYQ Relevance

    [UPSC 2025] Why is maritime security vital to protect India’s sea trade? Discuss maritime and coastal security challenges and the way forward.

    Linkage: The PYQ examines India’s maritime security, sea trade, and challenges in protecting maritime interests. The article extends maritime security beyond naval issues to the safety, consular protection, and welfare of Indian seafarers during international crises.

  • Critically discuss the objectives of Bhoodan and Gramdan movements initiated by Acharya Vinoba Bhave and their success.

  • Critically examine the compulsions which prompted India to play a decisive roles in the emergence of Bangladesh.

  • Write a critical note on the evolution and significance of the slogan “Jai Jawan Jai Kisan”.

  • Analyze the circumstances that led to Tashkent Agreement in 1966. Discuss the highlights of the agreement.

  • Discuss the contribution of Maulana Abul Kalam Azad to pre-and post-independent India.

  • The New Economic Policy – 1921 of Lenin had influenced the policies adopted by India soon after independence. Evaluate.

  • Has the formation of linguistic States strengthened the cause of Indian Unity?

  • Discuss whether the formation of new states in recent times is beneficial or not for the economy of India.

    Formation of Chhattisgarh, Jharkhand, Uttarakhand in 2000, Telangana in 2014, and the reorganization of Jammu and Kashmir in 2019 were driven by demands for administrative efficiency, regional development, identity recognition, and better governance.

    Benefits of new state formation for the economy of India

    Higher growth rate – Eg- Uttarakhand’s economy has grown over 20 times in size in 23 years

    Balanced regional development – Addresses neglect of backward regions within larger states. Eg- Uttarakhand focused on hill infrastructure and tourism-led growth.

    Improved capital expenditure prioritization – Eg- Telangana increased irrigation spending through projects like Kaleshwaram.

    Fiscal focus on local needs – Eg- Hill-area connectivity in Uttarakhand vs plains-focused spending earlier.

    Better resource utilization –

    Telangana focused on IT and Pharma, leading to a GSDP share increase from 4.1% in 2014 to nearly 5% of national GDP by 2024-25.

    Jharkhand (40% of India’s mineral wealth) and Chhattisgarh significantly improved their mining and steel output post-formation.

    Employment generation – Eg- New state secretariats, universities, and agencies creating jobs.

    Competitive federalism gains – States innovate to attract investment. Eg- Telangana’s TS-iPASS single-window clearance system.

    Urban growth engines – New capitals stimulate construction and services. Eg- Development of Amravati in Andhra Pradesh.

    Administrative efficiency – reduced the “distance” between the government and the governed lead to faster and efficient decision-making. Eg- improved PDS coverage in Chhattisgarh.

    Counter-arguments – drawbacks for the economy of India

    Revenue dependence – New states rely heavily on central transfers.

    Uneven development within new states – Eg- Tribal belts in Chhattisgarh remain underdeveloped.

    Fragmentation of the national market – Eg- Different state-level compliances increasing transaction costs.

    Inter-state disputes over resources – Water, power, and assets become contentious. Eg- Krishna-Godavari water disputes between Telangana and Andhra Pradesh.

    High administrative costs –

    Creation of capitals, assemblies, and cadres strains finances. Eg- creation of Amravati

    Increase in per-unit costs of administration due to duplication of departments.

    Over-Administration also fuels corruption. Eg- Pooja Singhal case

    Weak institutional capacity – New administrations take time to mature. Eg- Staffing shortages and governance gaps in Uttarakhand.

    No automatic growth guarantee – Outcomes depend on governance quality. Eg- political instability in states like Jharkhand and Chhattisgarh deter long-term foreign investment.

    Environmental Degradation- Eg- industrialization and urbanization has led to disasters like the 2013 Kedarnath floods and 2023 Joshimath subsidence – High economic losses

    Way Forward

    Formation 2nd state reorganisation commission as suggested by Sudha Pai

    Strengthening cooperative federalism through Inter-state council – mandatory meetings and enforcement powers

    Strengthening fiscal federalism – Eg- state representation in Finance commission

    New state formation should be guided by objective economic criteria and robust transition planning to ensure that political reorganization strengthens economic growth.

  • Assess the main administrative issues and socio-cultural problems in the integration process of Indian Princely States. (150 words)

    The integration of 565 princely states into the Indian Union was one of the most complex administrative and socio-cultural challenges faced by independent India.

    Main Administrative Issues

    Proliferation of Small Principalities: Managing hundreds of fragmented, tiny states made coordinating a uniform consensus for accession exceptionally difficult.

    With British departure, paramountcy lapsed, giving princely states theoretical independence or choice to join India or Pakistan. Eg- Hyderabad, Junagadh, and Kashmir posed major challenges.

    Resistance of Rulers – Many rulers were reluctant to surrender sovereignty and merge with India

    Nizam of Hyderabad declared independence; required Operation Polo (1948) for integration.

    Nawab of Junagadh acceded to Pakistan despite Hindu-majority population, requiring Indian military intervention.

    Administrative Reorganisation

    Diverse administrative systems, revenue codes, and legal frameworks had to be unified.

    Some states were merged into provinces, others into unions (Eg- Rajasthan formed by merging 19 states).

    Privy Purse and Privileges created a long-term financial burden and was abolished only in 1971 by Indira Gandhi.

    Disbanding or absorbing irregular princely state armies into the unified Indian Armed Forces presented severe logistical and ranking issues.

    Socio-Cultural Problems

    Demographic and Religious Mismatches: Severe tensions emerged in regions where the ruler’s personal faith differed completely from the majority population. Eg- J&K

    Feudal social structures – entrenched landlordism, bonded labour, and caste hierarchies in princely territories.

    Low levels of education and modern administration in many princely states.

    Regional and linguistic identities complicated integration. Eg- Demand for linguistic reorganisation (SRC, 1956).

    Tribal and ethnic tensions in areas like Northeast India and Bastar.

    Deep-Rooted Feudal Allegiances: Decades of monarchical rule left local populations culturally more loyal to traditional princes than to a distant democratic federation.

    Communal Violence: The trauma of Partition ignited communal polarization in several states, making peaceful, secular integration harder to enforce.

    Sardar Patel‘s monumental efforts successfully overcame these multi-layered fractures, forging a unified, democratic, and geographically cohesive Indian nation.