💥Join UPSC 2027,2028 Mentorship (August Batch) + XFactor Notes & Microthemes PDF
Talk to Mentor

Civilsdaily

Login

Subject: Social Justice

  • Nearly 94,000 government schools shut in a decade

    Why in the News?

    A NITI Aayog report shows that about 94,000 government schools closed over the past decade. While the government calls it school rationalisation, concerns have been raised over its impact on access to education and the Right to Education (RTE).

    Key Findings

    • Government school enrolment declined from 71% (2005) to 49.24% (2024-25).
    • The sharpest decline was seen in Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, and Jammu & Kashmir.

    Government’s Stand vs Concerns

    Government’s Rationale

    • Merging low enrolment schools to improve teacher and resource utilisation.
    • Supported by the NEP 2020 concept of school complexes/clusters.

    Key Concerns

    • Increased travel distance, especially in rural and remote areas.
    • Greater impact on SC, ST, girl students and poor households.
    • May push disadvantaged families towards unaffordable private schools.

    Link with the Right to Education (RTE)

    • The Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education (RTE) Act, 2009 guarantees a neighbourhood school for children aged 6 to 14 years.
    • School closures should not compromise this legal entitlement or equitable access.
    • Unified District Information System for Education Plus (UDISE+) is India’s official school education database.

    [2018] Consider the following statements:

    1. As per the Right to Education (RTE) Act, to be eligible for appointment as a teacher in a State, a person would be required to possess the minimum qualification laid down by the concerned State Council of Teacher Education.

    2. As per the RTE Act, for teaching primary classes, a candidate is required to pass a Teacher Eligibility Test conducted in accordance with the National Council of Teacher Education guidelines.

    3. In India, more than 90% of teacher education institutions are directly under the State Governments.

    Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

    (a) 1 and 2

    (b) 2 only

    (c) 1 and 3

    (d) 1, 2 and 3

  • A medical education more inclusive

    Why in the News

    The National Medical Commission (NMC) issued revised guidelines on 27 July 2026 for admitting persons with disabilities to MBBS courses, replacing certificate-based disqualification with a functional assessment of whether a candidate can acquire the competencies needed to practise medicine. The change follows repeated legal challenges, including before the Supreme Court, to the earlier guidelines’ blanket exclusions.

    Key Highlights

    • Shift to Functional Assessment
      • MBBS eligibility will now be based on an applicant’s functional ability rather than the disability certificate alone.
      • Assessment will determine whether the candidate can acquire the competencies required to practise medicine.
      • Designated medical boards will conduct individual functional assessments.
    • Recognition of Reasonable Accommodation
      • Disability itself is not a ground for disqualification.
      • The guidelines recognise that: Assistive technology. Institutional support. Accessible infrastructure can enable candidates to successfully complete medical education.

    Why Were the Earlier Guidelines Challenged?

    • Earlier guidelines relied on fixed disability categories and thresholds.
    • Candidates could be declared ineligible solely because of the nature or extent of disability.
    • Petitioners argued that such blanket exclusions violated the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (RPwD) Act, 2016.
    • The Supreme Court observed that systemic discrimination against persons with benchmark disabilities should be eliminated.

    Significance

    • Promotes inclusive medical education.
    • Aligns with the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (RPwD) Act, 2016.
    • Shifts from a disability-based to a competency-based admission framework.

    Rights of Persons with Disabilities (RPwD) Act, 2016

    • Replaced the Persons with Disabilities Act, 1995.
    • Expanded recognised disabilities from 7 to 21.
    • Provides 4% reservation in government jobs and 5% reservation in higher educational institutions for persons with benchmark disabilities.
    • Administered by the Department of Empowerment of Persons with Disabilities, Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment.

    National Medical Commission (NMC)

    • Established under the National Medical Commission Act, 2019.
    • Replaced the Medical Council of India (MCI).
    • Regulates medical education and medical professionals in India.

    [2026] Which of the following statements with regard to the persons with disabilities in India is/are correct?
    1. The Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, an Act passed by the Parliament of India in 2018, mandates reservation in education and employment, places a legal duty on Governments to ensure accessibility and non-discrimination.
    2. The Sugamya Bharat Abhiyan focuses on achieving universal accessibility for Persons with Disabilities across three key domains – built infrastructure, transport systems and information and communication technology.
    3. The National Divyangjan Finance and Development Corporation (NDFDC) is a public sector organization set up by the Ministry of Corporate Affairs as a not-for-profit company to promote entrepreneurship among Persons with Disabilities (PwDs).
    Select the answer using the code given below:

    [A] 1 and 2

    [B] 2 only

    [C] 1 and 3

    [D] 1 only

  • Outdated contraception, early conception: Counting the babies that India didn’t plan for

    Why in the News

    India’s total fertility rate has fallen to the replacement level of about two children per woman, a figure widely read as proof the country has completed its demographic transition. This headline number conceals a persistent gap between how many children women actually want and how many they have, meaning India’s fertility decline is a policy problem rather than a solved story.

    What is the difference between the Total Fertility Rate and the Wanted Fertility Rate?

    1. Total Fertility Rate (TFR): TFR is the average number of births per woman across her reproductive years, counting all births including those women did not plan or want.
    2. Wanted Fertility Rate: This counts only births that match what women say they intended, revealing their actual preferred family size.
    3. The national gap: Nationally, women have an average of 2.0 children while their desired family size is about 1.6, a gap of 0.4 children per woman.
    4. States with the widest gap: Eight states, Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, Jharkhand, Rajasthan, Madhya Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Assam and Haryana, have a gap of more than 0.3 children per woman.

    Why has India reached low fertility despite near-universal marriage?

    1. Marriage pattern: Only about 1% of women remain never married by ages 45 to 49, and the median age at first birth is 21.2 years, unlike most low-fertility countries where late marriage drives the decline.
    2. Sterilisation-led control: Indian women largely control fertility by having children, reaching their desired family size, and then permanently stopping through sterilisation, rather than through methods that space births.
    3. Missing spacing tools: Tools that help young couples delay a first birth or space children are largely missing, so unintended pregnancies cluster in the early years of marriage among the youngest women.
    4. Health consequence: This pattern is also reflected in relatively poor maternal and child health outcomes.

    Does India’s low fertility number hide a larger unmet need than it appears?

    1. Informed choice gap: Informed choice around sterilisation remains partial, with many women undergoing the procedure without fully informed consent. When these women are counted alongside those with unmet contraceptive needs, India’s “unwanted family planning” problem appears much larger than TFR figures suggest.
    2. Son preference inflation: In several states, families do not stop having children after one or two. In fact they continue until they have a son, meaning a disproportionate share of historically recorded “unwanted” births were daughters.
    3. Progress already visible: Unintended pregnancies have fallen from 21% in 2005-06 to 8% in 2019-21, and son preference is slowly weakening among younger and more educated families.

    Conclusion

    The article’s central argument is that India’s near-replacement TFR is not evidence the fertility story is finished, since it rests on a gap between wanted and actual fertility sustained by late spacing, partial informed choice, and residual son preference. What remains unresolved is the recent decline in modern contraceptive method use, which risks keeping the country’s unwanted-fertility gap in place even as the headline birth rate keeps falling.

    Back2Basics:

    Total Fertility Rate (TFR)

    1. Definition: TFR is the average number of live births a woman would have by the end of her reproductive years, calculated from age-specific fertility rates for ages 15 to 49.
    2. Source: TFR is tracked through the Sample Registration System (SRS) and the National Family Health Survey (NFHS).
    3. Replacement level: A TFR of 2.1 is generally considered replacement level; India’s national TFR has reached around 2.0, with Bihar at 2.9 against Kerala and Tamil Nadu at around 1.8.

    Understanding “Replacement Level” (2.1)

    1. The “0.1” Factor: The extra 0.1 accounts for the fact that some children do not survive to reproductive age, and slightly more boys are born than girls.
    2. Developing vs. Developed: In countries with high infant mortality rates, the replacement level can actually be much higher than 2.1 (sometimes up to 2.5 or 3.0) to stabilize the population.

    PYQ Relevance

    [UPSC 2014] While we flaunt India’s demographic dividend, we ignore the dropping rates of employability. What are we missing while doing so? Where will the jobs that India desperately needs come from? Explain.

    Linkage: The PYQ examines how demographic trends influence India’s development prospects. The article shows that replacement-level fertility alone does not ensure a demographic dividend, as unmet family planning needs persist.

  • Alongside Centre, states’ education expenditure too declined over past 12 years

    Why in the News

    Amid ongoing youth protests demanding education reform and Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan’s resignation, data analysis shows the decline in education spending is not confined to the Union Budget. In fact, State Governments’ own education spending share has fallen too over the same period.

    Why does state level spending matter when education policy debates usually focus on the Centre?

    1. Concurrent subject: Education is in the Concurrent List (Seventh Schedule), so both the Union and State Governments can legislate and spend on it.
    2. The Centre’s own decline: The Education Ministry’s share of the Union Budget fell from 4.6% (2013-14) to 2.5% (2025-26).
    3. The national state average mirrors it: The average share of all States’ and Union Territories’ expenditure devoted to education fell from around 17% (2013-14), tracking the same downward trend as the Centre’s budget share.

    What does the state level data reveal about educational outcomes?

    1. Bihar versus Kerala: Bihar’s Gross Enrolment Ratio (GER) at the secondary level is 45, against Kerala’s 94, confirming long held differences in educational outcomes.
    2. GER as a measure of distance to travel: Gross Enrolment Ratio (GER) is the number of students enrolled in a given education level, regardless of age, divided by the official age-group population for that level and multiplied by 100; a low GER indicates how far a state is from achieving adequate educational coverage.
    3. Spending share does not track outcome: Kerala and Tamil Nadu, despite strong GER, spend a lower share of their budgets on education than the national average, while Bihar and Delhi spend higher shares, showing that budget share alone does not explain educational outcomes.

    Is there an exception that breaks the declining trend?

    1. Delhi under the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP): Between 2014-15 and 2024-25, Delhi’s education spending share increased sharply even as the national average declined, reflecting a government that prioritised health and education.
    2. Kerala and Tamil Nadu have converged toward, then fallen behind, the national average: Kerala allocated a higher than average share until 2020 (COVID-19 period) and has lagged since; Tamil Nadu broadly tracked and later fell slightly below the national average over the long term.

    Conclusion

    The decline in India’s education spending is a joint Centre-State phenomenon, not solely a Union Government decision. The exception of Delhi’s rising education expenditure under a government that made education a political priority suggests the decline reflects policy choices, not an unavoidable trend. The findings therefore distribute responsibility for India’s education outcomes across both levels of government.

    Back2Basics

    1. Gross Enrolment Ratio (GER): The total enrolment in a specific level of education, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the population in the official age group for that level; a key indicator of the reach of the education system.
    2. Concurrent List: The list of subjects under the Seventh Schedule of the Constitution of India on which both Parliament and State Legislatures can make laws. In case of inconsistency, Parliamentary law prevails under Article 254.

    PYQ Relevance

    [UPSC 2022] The Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009 remains inadequate in promoting incentive-based system for children’s education without generating awareness about the importance of schooling. Analyse.

    Linkage: The PYQ examines challenges in implementing the Right to Education through adequate public investment, equitable access, and improved educational outcomes. The article highlights declining education expenditure by both the Centre and States, raising concerns over financing and effective implementation of the Right to Education.

  • It’s not just about a retest, it’s about the India story

    Why in the News:

    Protesters at Jantar Mantar are demanding Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan’s resignation over the NEET (National Eligibility cum Entrance Test) paper leak, and the government is countering with a promise of a clean retest. Both sides are treating a retest as the solution, when the actual failure is a shrinking Union education budget and unresolved Centre-state coordination since education moved to the Concurrent List in 1976.

    What does a retest actually fix, and what does it leave untouched?

    1. Narrow scope of a retest: A retest addresses the manipulation of a single examination cycle, nothing more.
    2. Small share of aspirants affected: Competitive examinations like NEET select only a small fraction of the hundreds of thousands who appear.
    3. The larger unaddressed problem: The majority of India’s youth remain ill-prepared and poorly equipped to participate in the country’s growth story, a gap no retest can close.

    How has the Union government’s own education-spending record shaped this crisis?

    1. Declining budget share: Union government allocations for education have fallen sharply as a percentage of total government expenditure over the twelve years since the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP)-led National Democratic Alliance (NDA) government took charge.
    2. Signal, not just shortfall: This downward trajectory reflects the government’s low prioritisation of education, not merely a resource constraint.
    3. Policy without investment: The government has refreshed the National Education Policy but has not matched it with investment in human resources as infrastructure for growth.

    Why does the 1976 shift of education to the Concurrent List complicate a fix?

    1. Constitutional history: Education was a State subject until 1976, when it was moved to the Concurrent List.
    2. Coordination requirement: Concurrent List placement means systemic reform requires substantial coordination between the Centre and State governments, not unilateral Union action.
    3. Limits of a Union-only response: A retest ordered by the Union government cannot substitute for the coordinated systemic reform the Concurrent List structure demands.

    What is the political stake if the underlying failure remains unaddressed?

    1. A generation coming of age: By the next general election in 2029, a generation of voters will have grown up entirely under NDA-led governments.
    2. Rising impatience: This cohort is likely to be far less tolerant of an unreformed education system and the toll it takes on growth.
    3. The real demand: The Jantar Mantar mobilisation is not asking the government to fix one exam; it is demanding that education be placed at the centre of governance and political discourse.

    Conclusion:

    The NEET leak is only the visible trigger; the substantive failure is chronic underinvestment in education and unresolved Centre-state coordination on a subject moved to the Concurrent List in 1976. Unless the Union treats education as core to growth policy rather than an electoral-cycle afterthought, retests will keep recurring without addressing employability. A durable Centre-state financing and coordination mechanism for education outcomes remains missing.

  • Periodic Labour Force Survey (PLFS) Monthly Bulletin, June 2026

    Why in News?

    The National Statistical Office (NSO) under the Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation (MoSPI) released the PLFS Monthly Bulletin for June 2026, showing stable employment indicators with a marginal improvement in urban labour participation.

    Labour Market Indicators (15+ years)

    • Labour Force Participation Rate (LFPR): 54.4%, unchanged from May 2026 and slightly higher than 54.2% in June 2025.
    • Worker Population Ratio (WPR): 51.4%, unchanged from May 2026 and up from 51.2% a year earlier.
    • Unemployment Rate (UR): 5.5%, unchanged from both May 2026 and June 2025.

    Urban Trends

    • LFPR increased from 49.8% to 50.1%.
    • WPR improved from 46.6% to 46.8%.
    • UR rose slightly from 6.4% to 6.6%, but remained below 7.1% recorded in June 2025.

    Rural Trends

    • LFPR remained stable at 56.6%.
    • WPR remained stable at 53.8%.
    • UR declined marginally from 5.1% to 5.0%.

    Female Labour Force Participation

    • Overall female LFPR stood at 32.7%.
    • Rural female LFPR was 36.6%.
    • Urban female LFPR remained 24.8%.
    • Overall female participation was 0.7 percentage points higher than June 2025.

    About PLFS

    • Conducted by the National Statistical Office (NSO) under MoSPI.
    • India’s primary survey on employment and unemployment.
    • Since January 2025, it provides monthly and quarterly labour market estimates.
    • Monthly estimates follow the Current Weekly Status (CWS) approach.

    Key Terms

    • Labour Force Participation Rate (LFPR): Percentage of people who are employed or actively seeking employment.
    • Worker Population Ratio (WPR): Percentage of the population that is employed.
    • Unemployment Rate (UR): Percentage of unemployed persons in the labour force.

    Significance

    • Provides high-frequency employment data for policymaking.
    • Tracks labour market trends across rural and urban India.
    • Supports employment, skill development and social welfare planning.

    [2020] With reference to the Indian economy after the 1991 economic liberalization, consider the following statements:

    1.Worker productivity (Rs. per worker at 2004 — 05 prices) increased in urban areas while it decreased in rural areas.
    2.The percentage share of rural areas in the workforce steadily increased.
    3.In rural areas, the growth in non-farm economy increased.
    4.The growth rate in rural employment decreased.

    Which of the statements given above is/are Correct?
    a) 1 and 2 only
    b) 3 and 4 only
    c) 3 only
    d) 1, 2 and 4 only

  • Why is the centre revising the NFSA 

    Why in the News?

    The Union Food and Public Distribution Department has published a draft amendment to the National Food Security Act (NFSA), 2013 converting the Antyodaya Anna Yojana (AAY) entitlement from a household-based to a per-capita formula. Tamil Nadu and Kerala have objected, arguing the change will cut monthly foodgrain allocations for smaller households even though it is framed as an equity correction. The dispute revives a food-politics fault line between the Centre and these two States that traces back to the NFSA’s 2013 enactment.

    What has the Centre proposed, and what does it claim to fix?

    1. Current rule: Every Antyodaya Anna Yojana (AAY) household receives 35 kg of foodgrains per month, regardless of household size.
    2. Proposed rule: Each person in an AAY household is entitled to 7 kg per month, subject to a ceiling of 35 kg per household.
    3. Legal provision amended: The first provision to Section 3(1) of the NFSA, which governs the right to subsidised foodgrains for eligible households.
    4. Stated rationale: The F&PD Department says the household-based system causes intra-category inequity. Smaller households get a higher per-capita share. Larger households get a lower per-capita share that can fall below what priority households receive.
    5. Stated objective: The amendment aims to make allocation more rational and align entitlements with nutritional norms.
    6. Consultation window: Public comments were invited till July 13, 2026.
    7. Gap in the amendment: The draft does not address inclusion of ineligible persons as beneficiaries. This problem remains a State-level issue.

    Why have Tamil Nadu and Kerala historically treated food policy as high-stakes politics?

    1. Kerala’s PDS legacy: Kerala traces informal food distribution mechanisms to the erstwhile princely State of Travancore and launched a formal Public Distribution System (PDS) in 1962, three years before the Food Corporation of India (FCI) was established.
    2. Tamil Nadu’s political precedent: Incumbent governments lost power in 1952 and 1967 over failure to manage rice shortages, making rice policy a lasting political sensitivity.
    3. Kerala’s resistance to the 2013 NFSA: The Congress-led UDF government, despite the Congress-led UPA pushing the law at the Centre, resisted implementation. It argued the law would drop a large number of poor families and impose a heavy financial burden on the State.
    4. Delayed Kerala rollout: Chief Minister Oommen Chandy committed to enforcing the NFSA, but the formal decision was taken only under his successor, Pinarayi Vijayan.
    5. Tamil Nadu’s universal rice policy: Chief Minister Jayalalithaa opposed the NFSA after her government began distributing free rice to all ration cardholders in 2011, regardless of economic status.
    6. Concession extracted in 2013: Tamil Nadu secured a Central guarantee that its then-existing allocation levels would be legally protected under the NFSA.
    7. Delayed adoption: Both southern States joined the rest of the country in implementing the NFSA only in November 2016.

    Why does a per-capita formula built on a household ceiling disadvantage southern States?

    1. Mechanical effect of the formula: A household with fewer than five members receives less than 35 kg under the per-capita rule, since 7 kg multiplied by fewer than five persons falls short of the existing ceiling.
    2. Kerala’s structural exposure: Kerala’s Food Minister has argued that States characterised by nuclear families will lose out, since Kerala took the position in 2013 that AAY cardholders deserved “special consideration,” a stance it maintains.
    3. Tamil Nadu’s quantified loss: The State’s monthly allocation is projected to fall from 65,261 tonnes to 42,040 tonnes under the new formula.
    4. Scale of exposure in Tamil Nadu: Of 18.64 lakh AAY households, 15.75 lakh have fewer than five members, covering 58.51 lakh of the State’s 69.27 lakh AAY beneficiaries.
    5. Non-substitutability argument: Rice is a staple across all three daily meals for AAY cardholders and cannot be replaced with market purchases without significant out-of-pocket cost.
    6. North-South divide argument: Right to Food Campaign functionary Anuradha Talwar has argued that northern States, with larger average family sizes, will receive higher allocations under the new formula while southern States lose out.
    7. South’s collective stake: The five southern States and Puducherry together hold 52.51 lakh of India’s 250 lakh AAY household ceiling, about one-fifth of the national total, making the region’s exposure to the formula change substantial in absolute terms.

    What is the way forward, and does it resolve the underlying tension?

    1. Process concern: A change of this scale should have been subjected to wider public scrutiny before a consensus was sought, according to food policy commentary cited in the report.
    2. Middle-path proposal: Tamil Nadu Progressive Consumer Centre president T. Sadagopan has suggested a flat allocation of 30 kg per household, irrespective of family size, as a compromise.
    3. Fiscal rationale for the middle path: A flat 30 kg allocation would still let the Union government reduce its overall subsidy bill compared to the current 35 kg ceiling.
    4. Implementation context: Current off-take and distribution data for the financial year up to May 2026 show uneven utilisation across southern States relative to their allocations, indicating that formula design alone will not resolve execution gaps in the PDS chain.
    5. Unresolved gap: Neither the Centre’s draft nor the proposed middle path addresses the separate, State-level problem of ineligible persons remaining on beneficiary lists.

    Conclusion

    The NFSA amendment corrects a genuine per-capita inequity within the AAY category, but the household ceiling built into the new formula shifts the burden onto smaller-household southern States, reviving a federal food-politics conflict rooted in each State’s distinct PDS history. The amendment leaves the parallel problem of ineligible beneficiaries at the State level untouched, meaning one inequity is corrected while another persists. A flat per-household allocation remains a proposed middle path, but the Centre has not formally responded to it.

    PYQ Relevance

    [UPSC 2013] What are the salient features of the National Food Security Act, 2013? How has the Food Security Bill helped in eliminating hunger and malnutrition in India?

    Linkage: The PYQ examines the provisions and effectiveness of the NFSA as a rights-based framework for ensuring food and nutritional security. The proposed shift from a fixed 35 kg entitlement per AAY household to 7 kg per person, capped at 35 kg, enables a critical assessment of whether rationalising foodgrain allocation may weaken existing NFSA entitlements and affect vulnerable households unevenly.

  • Poshan Tracker

    Why in News?

    The Ministry of Women and Child Development (MoWCD) highlighted the achievements of the Poshan Tracker, India’s real time nutrition monitoring platform under Mission Poshan 2.0.

    What is Poshan Tracker?

    • Mobile based application launched in March 2021.
    • Developed by MoWCD with the National e-Governance Division (NeGD).
    • Digital backbone of POSHAN Abhiyaan.
    • Enables real time monitoring of nutrition, beneficiaries, and Anganwadi services.

    About POSHAN Abhiyaan

    • Launched on 8 March 2018.
    • India’s flagship National Nutrition Mission.
    • In 2021, merged with Anganwadi Services and Scheme for Adolescent Girls under Mission Saksham Anganwadi and Poshan 2.0.

    Key Features

    • Aadhaar based beneficiary authentication.
    • Facial Recognition System (FRS) for service verification.
    • Digital home visit scheduler.
    • Poshan Calculator based on WHO Child Growth Standards.
    • Tracks stunting, wasting, underweight, SAM, MAM, and obesity.
    • Provides ECCE learning content and Poshan Helpline (1515).

    Achievements (May 2026)

    • Covers 28 States and 8 UTs.
    • 8.93 crore beneficiaries registered.
    • 7.7 crore children tracked through Aadhaar authenticated database.
    • 6.3 crore children (0 to 5 years) monitored for growth (about 94% coverage).
    • 5.5 crore beneficiaries received Supplementary Nutrition for at least 15 days.

    Significance

    • Enables evidence based nutrition governance.
    • Reduces leakages and duplicate beneficiaries.
    • Strengthens Anganwadi service delivery.
    • Supports Digital India and Viksit Bharat.

    Prelims Facts

    • POSHAN Abhiyaan: 2018.
    • Poshan Tracker: March 2021.
    • Nodal Ministry: Ministry of Women and Child Development.
    • Uses WHO Child Growth Standards.
    • Operates under Mission Saksham Anganwadi and Poshan 2.0.

    [2023] Consider the following statements in the context of interventions being undertaken under Anaemia Mukt Bharat Strategy:
    1. It provides prophylactic calcium supplementation for pre-school children, adolescents and pregnant women.
    2. It runs a campaign for delayed cord clamping at the time of child- birth.
    3. It provides for periodic deworming to children and adolescents.
    4. It addresses non-nutritional causes of anaemia in endemic pockets with special focus on malaria, hemoglobinopathies and fluorosis.
    How many of the statements given above are correct?

    [A] Only one

    [B] Only two

    [C] Only three

    [D] All four

  • AISHE 2023-24: India’s Higher Education Enrolment Reaches 4.5 Crore

    Why in News?

    The Ministry of Education has released the All India Survey on Higher Education (AISHE) 2022-23 and 2023-24, showing that India’s higher education enrolment has reached 4.5 crore, reflecting significant improvements in access, gender parity, and participation of socially disadvantaged groups.

    Key Highlights

    • Total higher education enrolment reached 4.5 crore in 2023-24.
    • Enrolment increased by 31.5% from 3.42 crore in 2014-15.
    • Data was collected from 59,533 Higher Education Institutions (HEIs).
    • Institutional participation in the survey exceeded 90%.

    Gender Parity

    • Gender Parity Index (GPI) stood at 1.08 in 2023-24.
    • Female participation has remained higher than male participation for seven consecutive years.
    • Gross Enrolment Ratio (GER): Overall GER: 30, and Female GER: 31.2
    • Female teachers increased to 7.78 lakh, constituting 44.9% of the total teaching workforce.

    Inclusion of Marginalised Communities

    • Scheduled Castes (SC): Enrolment increased by 51.4% since 2014-15. Total enrolment reached 69.72 lakh. GER increased from 18.9 to 27.8.
    • Scheduled Tribes (ST):Enrolment increased by 75.7%. Total enrolment reached 28.83 lakh. GER increased from 13.5 to 22.8.
    • Other Backward Classes (OBC): Enrolment increased by 60.2%. Student strength rose from 1.13 crore to 1.80 crore.

    STEM Education

    • STEM enrolment crossed 1.02 crore students.
    • Female share in STEM increased from 38.4% in 2014-15 to 44% in 2023-24.
    • Total teachers in higher education increased to 17.32 lakh.

    About AISHE

    • All India Survey on Higher Education (AISHE) was launched in 2011 by the Ministry of Education.
    • It is India’s primary database on higher education.
    • Covers: Universities, Colleges, and Standalone institutions
    • Collects information on: Student enrolment, Teachers, Infrastructure, Courses, Examination results, and Finance
    • Data is self-reported by institutions through an online Data Capture Format (DCF) portal.
    • The Ministry conducts validation and scrutiny, while data accuracy is the responsibility of the participating institutions.

    Key Indicators Used in AISHE

    • Gross Enrolment Ratio (GER): Percentage of students enrolled in higher education compared to the total population in the 18 to 23 years age group.
    • Gender Parity Index (GPI): Ratio of female GER to male GER. GPI = 1 indicates equal participation. GPI > 1 indicates higher female participation.

    [2017] What is the aim of the programme ‘Unnat Bharat Abhiyan’?

    [a] Achieving 100% literacy by promoting collaboration between voluntary organizations and government’s education system and local communities.

    [b] Connecting institutions of higher education with local communities to address development challenges through appropriate technologies.

    [c] Strengthening India’s scientific research institutions in order to make India a scientific and technological power.

    [d] Developing human capital by allocating special funds for health care and education of rural and urban poor, and organizing skill development programmes and vocational training for them.

    1. VB-G RAM G Act, 2025 Comes into Force

      Why in News?

      The Viksit Bharat – Guarantee for Rozgar and Aajeevika Mission (Gramin) [VB-G RAM G] Act, 2025 came into force across India on 1 July 2026, replacing and expanding the rural employment guarantee framework.

      What is VB-G RAM G?

      • A statutory rural employment guarantee programme aimed at strengthening livelihoods and creating durable rural assets.
      • Guarantees 125 days of wage employment annually to eligible rural households, replacing the earlier 100-day guarantee.
      • Focuses on Rural livelihood security, Natural resource conservation, Agricultural productivity, Women-led development, and Creation of durable community assets

      Key Features

      • Statutory guarantee: 125 days of wage employment.
      • Minimum daily wage: No notified wage below ₹300.
      • National average wage: Increased from ₹298.8 to ₹327.4 per day (over 10% increase).
      • Wage hikes of 15 to 25% in States such as Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, Jharkhand, West Bengal, Assam, Arunachal Pradesh and Himachal Pradesh.
      • Interim allocation: ₹95,692.31 crore released to States/UTs for implementation.

      Objectives

      • Enhance rural employment security.
      • Promote sustainable livelihood opportunities.
      • Strengthen climate-resilient and productive rural assets.
      • Improve agricultural productivity through resource conservation.
      • Increase women’s participation and economic empowerment.
      • Ensure transparent, technology-driven implementation.

      Implementation Measures

      • Launch of the VB-G RAM G software platform.
      • Distribution of Rural Employment Guarantee Cards.
      • Digital monitoring and timely wage payments.
      • Focus on outcome-based asset creation.

      [2021] With reference to casual workers employed in India, consider the following statements:
      1. All casual workers are entitled for Employees Provident Fund Coverage.
      2. All casual workers are entitled for regular working hours and overtime payment.
      3. The government can by a notification specify that an establishment or industry shall pay wages only through its bank account.
      Which of the above statement are correct?

      [A] 1 and 2 only

      [B] 2 and 3 only

      [C] 1 and 3 only

      [D] 1, 2 and 3