💥Join UPSC 2027,2028 Mentorship (July Batch) + XFactor Notes & Microthemes PDF

Category: Burning Issues

  • [Burning Issue] CAG Audit and its Significance

    [Burning Issue] CAG Audit and its Significance

    cag

    Context

    • In its latest audit reports tabled in Parliament, Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG), as mandated by the Constitution of India, has highlighted several issues with various ministries and departments related to operational and financial irregularities.
    • In this context, this edition of the Burning Issue will tell the latest reports of CAG and explain the office of CAG in India.

    Few noticeable latest reports of CAG

    • About Assam’s NRC: The CAG has flagged serious irregularities, including “haphazard development” of software for the exercise, making it prone to data tampering, and flagged undue profits worth crores amassed by the system integrator (SI) by violating the Minimum Wages Act during the update exercise of the National Register of Citizens (NRC) in Assam.
    • About CPSE: The Comptroller and Auditor General of India (CAG) has also raised concern over the high number of vacancies for the post of independent directors in 59 of the 72 (82 per cent) listed central public sector enterprises (CPSEs).
    • About DRDO: According to another CAG report, the DRDO took 17 to 569 weeks for the submission of proposals in 29 projects, which had a cascading effect on sanctioning of the project. The delays resulted in changes in the technology to be used, import of the said items by users, and non-availability of the required item with the users.
    • About Plastic waste management: In a compliance audit report, CAG has said that the Union Ministry of Environment, Forest & Climate Change (MoEF&CC) has mechanisms to assess the generation of plastic waste, but none for its collection and safe disposal. Plastic Waste Management (PWM) Rules, 2016, could not be implemented effectively and efficiently due to a lack of an action plan by the MoEF&CC and the ministry is also lacking in effective coordination with pollution control boards.

    About CAG

    “I am of the opinion that this dignitary or officer is probably the most important officer in the Constitution of India. He is the one man who is going to see that the expenses voted by Parliament are not exceeded, or varied from what has been laid down by Parliament in the Appropriation Act. If this functionary is to carry out the duties — and his duties, I submit, are far more important than the duties even of the Judiciary” – Dr. B.R. Ambedkar

    • The Constitution of India provides for an independent office of the Comptroller and Auditor General of India (CAG).
    • His duty is to uphold the Constitution of India and the laws of Parliament in the field of financial administration.
    • He is the head of the Indian Audit and Accounts Department. He is the guardian of the public purse and controls the entire financial system of the country at both levels- the centre and state.

    History of office of CAG

    • The role of the CAG evolved in British India with Lord Canning initiating a major administrative drive before the Mutiny of 1857.
    • In May 1858, a separate department was set up with an Accountant General, who was responsible for accounting and auditing the financial transactions under the East India Company.
    • After Mutiny, the British Crown took over and passed the Government of India Act 1858. This laid the foundation stone of the Imperial Audit. Sir Edward Drummond took charge in 1860 as the first Auditor General and the term ‘Comptroller and Auditor General of India’ was first used in 1884.
    • Under the Montford Reforms of 1919, the Auditor General became independent of the government. The Government of India Act 1935 strengthened the position of the Auditor General by providing for Provincial Auditors General in a federal set-up.

    Constitutional provisions related to CAG

    • Art. 148: broadly speaks of the CAG, his appointment, oath and conditions of service
    • Art. 149: broadly speaks of the Duties and Powers of the CAG
    • Art. 150: The accounts of the Union and the States shall be kept in such form as the President may, on the advice of the CAG, prescribe.
    • Art. 151: Audit Reports: The reports of the Comptroller and Auditor-General of India relating to the accounts of the Union shall be submitted to the president, who shall cause them to be laid before each House of Parliament.

    Types of Audit performed by CAG

    • Regulatory Audit: It is an audit to ascertain whether the money spent was authorized for the purpose for which they were spent and also that the expenditure incurred was in conformity with the laws, rules and regulations.
    • Supplementary Audit: CAG takes up supplementary audits in PSUs, even after the commercial audits are done by the auditors appointed by the CAG, for the detection of leakages.
    • Propriety Audit: It focuses on whether the expenditure made is in the public interest or not i.e. it moves beyond mere scrutiny of expenditure to question its wisdom and economy to identify cases of improper expenditure and waste of public money.
    • Efficiency Audit: Efficiency audit as the name suggests answers the question of whether the money invested yields optimum results. The main purpose of the efficiency audit is to ensure that the investment is prioritized and channeled into its most profitable utilization.
    • Performance Audit: Performance audit answers whether the government programs such as NREGA have achieved the desired objectives at the lowest cost and given the intended benefits. It generally does not get into the merits-demerits of a particular policy/scheme but rather looks into the effectiveness with which the scheme is implemented and any deficiencies thereof.
    • Environmental Audit: This is a relatively new area of concern for the CAG keeping in mind the challenges facing India with respect to the conservation and management of the environment. More than 100 audits on environmental issues like bio-diversity, pollution of rivers, waste management have been conducted by the CAG to identify critical issues and suggest possible solutions by involving all stakeholders.

    Independence of the Institution of CAG

    • For the effective functioning of this important institution of the CAG it is paramount to ensure independence. There are several provisions enshrined in the Constitution to safeguard CAG’s independence.
    • He is appointed by the President by a warrant under his hand and seal and his oath of office requires him to uphold the Constitution of India and the laws made thereunder.
    • He is provided with security of tenure and can be removed by the President only in accordance with the procedure mentioned in the Constitution (same as a judge of SC).
    • He is not eligible for further office, either under the Government of India or of any state, after he ceases to hold his office.
    • His salary and other service conditions though determined by the Parliament cannot be varied to his disadvantage after appointment.
    • His administrative powers and the conditions of service of persons serving in the Indian Audit and Accounts Department shall be prescribed by the President only after consulting him.
    • The administrative expenses of the office of CAG, including all salaries, allowances and pensions of persons serving in that office are charged upon the Consolidated Fund of India and are not subject to the vote of Parliament.

    Sources of the Audit Mandate of CAG

    • Constitution– The existence and mandate of the Comptroller and Auditor General of India emanate from Articles 148 to 151 of the Constitution. Article 149 stipulates the Duties and Powers of the Comptroller and Auditor General
    • Statute– DPC Act, 1971 (Duties, Powers and Conditions of Service Act) lays down the general principles of Government accounting and the broad principles in regard to the audit of receipts and expenditure
    • Regulations– Regulations on Audit and accounts as framed and notified in the official Gazette.
    • Scope of audit– Within the audit mandate, the Comptroller and Auditor General is the sole authority to decide the scope and extent of the audit to be conducted by him or on his behalf.

    Duties and Fuctions of the CAG

    Duties

    • He audits the accounts related to all expenditures from the Consolidated Fund of India, the Consolidated Fund of each state and UT having a legislative assembly.
    • He audits all expenditures from the Contingency Fund of India and the Public Account of India as well as the Contingency Fund and Public Account of each state.
    • He audits all trading, manufacturing, profit and loss accounts, balance sheets and other subsidiary accounts kept by any department of the Central Government and the state governments.
    • He audits the receipts and expenditures of all bodies and authorities substantially financed from the Central or State revenues; government companies; other corporations and bodies, when so required by related laws.

    Functions

    • He audits all transactions of the Central and state governments related to debt, sinking funds, deposits, advances, suspense accounts and remittance business.
    • He audits the accounts of any other authority when requested by the President or Governor e.g. Local bodies.
    • He advises the President with regard to the prescription of the form in which the accounts of the Centre and states shall be kept.
    • He submits his audit reports relating to the accounts of the Centre to the President, who shall, in turn, place them before both houses of Parliament.
    • He submits his audit reports relating to the accounts of a State to the Governor, who shall, in turn, place them before the state legislature.
    • He ascertains and certifies the net proceeds of any tax or duty and his certificate is final on the matter.
    • He acts as a guide, friend and philosopher of the Public Accounts Committee of the Parliament.
    • He compiles and maintains the accounts of state governments. In 1976, he was relieved of his responsibilities with regard to the compilation and maintenance of accounts of the Central government due to the separation of accounts from the audit.
    • He submits 3 audit reports to the President: an audit report on appropriation accounts, an audit report on finance accounts and audit report on public undertakings.

    However, there are the following Limitations on the Powers of CAG

    • Report is post-facto: i.e. after the expenditure is incurred and has only prospective value in improving systems and procedures.
    • Secret service expenditure: such expenditure is outside the purview of the CAG and he cannot call for particulars of expenditure incurred by the executive agencies, but has to accept a certificate from the competent administrative authority that the expenditure has been so incurred.
    • Rising PPP investments: Since the legislation, the government has increased its participation with the private sector through the PPT (public-private-transfer) and BOT (build-own-transfer) models. However, the rules have not undergone a significant change and CAG does not have the power to audit PPP (Public Private Partnership) investments.
    • NGO’s, PRI and ULB’s out of audit ambit: There is no provision for auditing of funds that are given to an NGO and elected local bodies. Also, CAG presently does not have the full authority to audit the PRIs and ULBs. In most states, the Examiners functioning under the Finance Department audit the accounts of local bodies.
    • DRDAs also not auditable: (District Rural Development Authority) today are managing large sums of money for rural development yet they also are outside the purview of CAG audits.
    • Denial of documents: the path to obtain the relevant documents to carry out their tasks and make a report on its basis has never been easy for audit department. It has also been involved in several cases where the necessary documents were denied to the CAG and the powers of the CAG had to be reinstated by the Judiciary. In the past, almost 30% of the documents demanded by CAG officials have been denied to them.
    • Mode of Appointment: The present selection process for the CAG is entirely internal to the Government machinery; no one outside has any knowledge of what criteria are applied, how names are shortlisted and how a final selection is made. There is a lack of clarity on the criterion, the definition of the field of choice, and the procedures for the selection of this high constitutional functionary.
    • Word audit not defined: The word ‘audit’ has not been defined in either the Constitution or in the CAG Act, 1971. We have so far been going by 150 years of history, tradition, existing provisions and international practice. The CAG has not formulated its own policy in the above reports and has only gone by policy prescriptions recommended internally at various levels within the government.

    Way forward

    • Bring PPP and PRIs under CAG: Former CAG Vinod Rai recommended that all private-public partnerships (PPPs), “Panchayti Raj Institutions” and societies benefiting from government funds should come within the ambit of the CAG.
    • Enhance the CAGs powers to access information: He also requested to enhance the CAGs powers to access information under the audit act. As of 2013, it was estimated that 60% of government spending does not come under the scrutiny of CAG.
    • Amend CAG Act: He also suggested amendments to the CAG Act, 1971 to bring it in line with the current times privatization and IT revolution.
    • Application of the latest technologies: such as AI and Big Data in the audit process can help CAG better perform its duties. In this regard, CAG came out with a Big Data management policy in 2016 and also established a Centre for Data Management and Analytics in Delhi
    • A collegium kind of body: should be formed the choosing the person for CAG’s office to end the monopoly of the Executive.

    Conclusion

    • No doubt that this organization has come a long way from that time to where it’s standing today but like every institution constantly requires amends, rectifications, and upgradation to catch up to the modern times.
    • We can hope that by implying these reforms, this organization will enhance the transparency of the system through which the lucid imagery of our democracy would be clearly visible.

    Click and get your FREE Copy of CURRENT AFFAIRS Micro Notes

    (Click) FREE 1-to-1 on-call Mentorship by IAS-IPS officers | Discuss doubts, strategy, sources, and more

  • [Burning Issue] Good Governance Week

    governance

    Context

    • Recently, the good governance week celebration came to an end. The week included the launching of several programs and initiatives related to good governance.
    • In this context, this edition of the burning issue will elaborate on good governance and good governance week.

    About Good Governance Week

    • In 2014, the Government of India paid tribute to the former Prime Minister of India, Shri Atal Bihari Vajpayee, by declaring his birthday (December 25) as ‘Good Governance Day’ – Susasan Divas.
    • Department of Administrative Reforms and Public Grievances, Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances & Pensions, Government of India celebrates Good Governance Week from 19-25 December every year.
    • The decision to celebrate Good Governance Week (Sushasan Saptah) was taken by the government in the year of Amrit Mahotsav (75th Year of Independence) ie. 2021.
    • During the week-long celebrations, various activities are taken up to demonstrate the government’s commitment to providing transparent, effective and accountable governance to the people of this country.

    Good Governance Week 2022

    • Good Governance Week (Sushasan Saptah) campaign “Prashasan Gaon Ki Aur” was launched during 20-25 December 2021 and it aimed at showcasing and replicating the best governance practices at the grassroots level. The campaign intended to create a national movement for good governance and motivate the stakeholders both in the government as well as outside the government.
    • The Second Sushasan Saptah to be celebrated during 19th – 25th December 2022, aims at furthering Good Governance at every level in India. As part of the celebrations, a 5-day “Prashasan Gaon ki Ore campaign” is to be organised from 19th December 2022.
    • The Nationwide campaign for the Redressal of Public Grievances and Improving Service Delivery will be held in all Districts, States and Union Territories of India. Over 700 District Collectors will be participating in the Campaign and officials will be visiting Tehsils and Panchayat Samiti Headquarters.
    • District Collectors have also identified 81,27,944 applications for Service Delivery to be disposed of, along with 19,48,122 Public Grievances to be redressed in State Grievance Portals.
    • This is the second time in Amrit Kaal Period, that the Government of India will be conducting a National Campaign at Tehsil level to address Public Grievances and Improving Service Delivery. Prashasan Gaon ki Ore Abhiyaan will create a national movement for good governance that will inspire future generations.
    • 373 Best Good Governance Practices have been identified for discussion in District Level Workshops on December 23, 2022. 43 Success Stories in Public Grievances will also be shared during the Good Governance Week-2022.
    • 3,120 New Services identified by District Collectors across the country will be added for Online Service Delivery.

    What does Good Governance mean?

    • Governance refers to all processes of governing, the institutions, processes and practices through which issues of common concern are decided upon and regulated.
    • Good governance is the process of measuring how public institutions conduct public affairs and manage public resources and guarantee the realization of human rights in a manner essentially free of abuse and corruption and with due regard for the rule of law.
    • While there is no internationally agreed definition of ‘good governance’, it may span the following topics: full respect of human rights, the rule of law, effective participation, multi-actor partnerships, political pluralism, transparent and accountable processes and institutions, an efficient and effective public sector, legitimacy, access to knowledge, information and education, political empowerment of people, equity, sustainability, and attitudes and values that foster responsibility, solidarity and tolerance.

    Good Governance according to United Nations

    The United Nations is playing an increasing role in good governance. According to former UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan, “Good governance is ensuring respect for human rights and the rule of law; strengthening democracy; promoting transparency and capacity in public administration.” To implement this, the UN follows eight principles:

    • Participation – People should be able to voice their own opinions through legitimate immediate organizations or representatives.
    • Rule of Law – Legal framework should be enforced impartially, especially on human rights laws.
    • Consensus Oriented – Mediates differing interests to meet the broad consensus on the best interests of a community.
    • Equity and Inclusiveness – People should have opportunities to improve or maintain their well-being.
    • Effectiveness and Efficiency – Processes and institutions should be able to produce results that meet the needs of their community while making the best of their resources.
    • Accountability – Governmental institutions, private sectors, and civil society organizations should be held accountable to the public and institutional stakeholders.
    • Transparency – Information should be accessible to the public and should be understandable and monitored.
    • Responsiveness – Institutions and processes should serve all stakeholders.

    Features of Good Governance

    • Good education facilities offered by the government have greater employability,
    • Development of basic infrastructures like roads, bridges, power, telecom, airport, irrigation and transport
    • Safety of public life, property, peaceful law and order,
    • Creating new employment opportunities in the government and private sectors, l Effectiveness and efficiency of working of government and its staffs,
    • A good business environment with a free-market economy,
    • Reducing inequalities in society through positive discrimination in favor of the poorest of the poor l Providing total freedom of speech, of religion, of work and attitude of non-interference by government.
    • Provision of more concessions to citizens and free from bias,
    • Good business environment and l Citizen centric services.

    Good Governance in India

    • The concept of “Good governance” is relatively a new term which has come to the limelight in the 1990s; however, the principle of good governance is not new to Indian society.
    • While throwing attention over the state of affairs in ancient India, it is noticed that the king or the ruler was bounded by the dharma which was precisely meant to ensure the good governance for the people. “Rajadharma” was the code of conduct or the rule of law which was superior to the will of the ruler.
    • Even in the great epics like Mahabharat and Ramayana, the rulers abide by the principles of good governance which are more often cited on many occasions.
    • In India, the concept was talked about in the Arthashastra, authored by Chanakya. He mentions the characteristics of a good king thus, “In the happiness of his subjects lies his happiness, in their welfare his welfare; whatever pleases himself, he does not consider as good, but whatever pleases his subjects he considers as good.”
    • Mahatma Gandhi advocated the concept ‘Ram Rajya’ for India based upon the principles of good governance which necessarily meant dreaming of India as a welfare state where the necessities of the down-trodden, the welfare of the commoner and their progress through indigenous industries would become the hallmark.
    • The Constitution of India also embodies the concept the good governance through its list of Fundamental Rights of the citizens and Directive Principle of State Policy.

    Good Governance Initiatives in India

    • Public service guarantee act: The public service guarantee act is also known as the Right to Public Services Act in some states. It provides for legislation and statutory laws that guarantee time-bound delivery of services by the government to the citizen and provides a mechanism for punishing the errant public servant who fails to provide the service stipulated under the statute, within the stipulated time. Madhya Pradesh was the first state to enact the Right to Service Act on 18th August 2010 and Bihar became the second state to implement it on 25th July 2011.
    • Citizen’s Charter: is a non-agency device for people’s participation. It is a document representing an effort to focus on the commitment of public organisations toward their clients/citizens. The Sevottam model is designed as an assessment tool by the Department of Administrative Reforms and Public Grievances (DARPG) in 2006. SEVOTTAM is the ‘Nine Criteria Model for Citizen Centricity’, meaning Uttam Seva or excellence in service delivery.
    • Right to Information: has emerged as a prominent concern in the field of public administration. Article 19(1) (a) of the Constitution includes the Right to Information. Right to Information opens up the government’s records to public scrutiny, thereby arming citizens with a vital tool to inform them about what the government does and how effectively; thereby making the government more accountable.
    • Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR): a governance-centric approach to citizen’s welfare, is an obligation on the part of the corporates to act in a manner that will serve the best interests of the society. The enactment of Section 135 of the Companies Act 2013 made CSR spending and reporting mandatory for the first time and brought CSR initiatives of Indian corporates under the purview of corporate law.
    • Good Governance Index: The Good Governance Index Was launched on the occasion of Good Governance Day on 25 December 2019. The Good Governance Index is a uniform tool across States to assess the Status of Governance and the impact of various interventions taken up by the State Government and Union Territories.
    • Some other notable initiatives: that enable better governance include the MyGov citizen engagement platform, MEITY’s e-governance platform, Digital India, Niti Aayog’s Aspirational Districts,

    Challenges to Good Governance in India

    • Corruption: Corruption has virtually spread in almost all aspects of public life. It not only averts the benefits of globalization to reach the common man but also denies transparency, accessibility and accountability, confuses rules and procedures, and proliferate mindless control and poor commitments at all levels. Hence,
    • The criminalization of Politics: The nexus of crime and politics is so strong that the common citizens of the country have no stand to say or exert their rights. In order to prevent such misuses on May 2, 2002, the Supreme Court of India has given a historic judgment following the public interest litigation (PIL) led by an NGO that, every candidate contesting an election to Parliament, State Legislatures or Municipal Corporations has to give true declarations of candidate’s educational qualifications, criminal charges and financial records.
    • Judicial delays: The most severe challenge relates to the complexity of adjudication as legal proceedings are lengthy and costly and the judiciary lacks personnel and logistics to deal with these matters.
    • Weak accountability mechanism: The general weakness of accountability mechanisms impedes improving services across the board. Bureaucratic complexities and procedures make it difficult for a citizen as well as civil society to navigate the system for timely and quality delivery of services.
    • The lack of transparency and secrecy: that have been associated with the administrative system from colonial times, besides generating corruption, has also led to injustice and favoritism.
    • The frequent transfer of key civil servants: has enormously contributed to failures in the delivery of services. In some states, the average tenure of a District Magistrate is less than one year. Development projects have also suffered as a result of frequent changes in project directors.

    Way forward

    • The step is to evolve from an “application-based right to access information” to “public information being automatically shared on a public platform” using technology. 
    • Inclusion of the public: Good governance is not created solely by the government. Every stakeholder has an equal role in achieving it. There is a need for greater accountability of any action/decision taken within the public domain. Inclusion will also make sure that well-intentioned government programs and policies do not stray from their intent. The need of the hour is to have stakeholder consensus in the government’s policies and projects. Any program being implemented must be outcome-oriented and achieved through larger stakeholder consensus building.
    • Regular monitoring of government schemes: All government schemes should be regularly monitored and evaluated by an independent (third) party, to ensure successful implementation, provide last-mile delivery, and give an unbiased view. This conforms with the global standards established by the UN, World Bank and others.
    • Consolidation of multiple redundant ministries: and overlapping schemes should be initiated, to streamline operations, improve efficiency and outcomes for better public service delivery, thereby improving the return on public investment.
    • To ameliorate criminalization from politics: It is necessary to ameliorate criminalization from politics and the seriousness of the matter should be properly worked out. Educated youngsters should be encouraged to enter into Indian politics and these young leaders should be properly nourished by patriotic commitments and abide by the core principles of democratic governance.
    • Check corruption: There is a foremost need to check corruption at all levels by raising public consciousness and strong commitments not to make dishonest compromises that would put down the moral values and ethics of life.

    Conclusion

    • Observing Good Governance Day (December 25) will continuously remind us that the ruling government should be development oriented, inclusive, yet forward-looking and global in its approach. It is only with good governance, that Gandhiji’s vision of creating a strong and prosperous India shall be enabled and fulfilled. 

    Click and get your FREE Copy of CURRENT AFFAIRS Micro Notes

    (Click) FREE 1-to-1 on-call Mentorship by IAS-IPS officers | Discuss doubts, strategy, sources, and more

  • [Burning Issue] CBD’s Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework (GBF)

    biodiversity

    Context

    • The United Nations Biodiversity Conference (COP15) ended in Montreal, Canada, on 19 December 2022 with a landmark agreement to guide global action on nature through to 2030.
    • Chaired by China and hosted by Canada, COP 15 resulted in the adoption of the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework (GBF) on the last day of negotiations. 
    • In this context, this edition of the burning issue will tell about the agreement in detail.

    About Convention on Biodiversity (CBD)

    • The CBD known informally as the Biodiversity Convention is a multilateral treaty having its origin at the Rio Earth Summit in 1992.
    • The convention has three main goals: the conservation of biodiversity, the sustainable use of its components, the fair and equitable sharing of benefits arising from genetic resources.
    • Its objective is to develop national strategies for the conservation and sustainable use of biological diversity, and it is often seen as the key document regarding sustainable development.
    • It has two supplementary agreements, the Cartagena Protocol and Nagoya Protocol.

    The Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework (GBF)

    Need of the Agreement

    • Dangerous decline in nature: The stakes could not be higher: the planet is experiencing a dangerous decline in nature as a result of human activity. It is experiencing its largest loss of lives since dinosaurs. One million plant and animal species are now threatened with extinction, many within decades.
    • Failure of Aichi targets: The targets are ambitious, considering that biodiversity is in a poor state. In 2020, the world failed to meet the last set of targets, the Aichi Targets. Countries would need to ensure success this time around.

    Aim

    • The GBF aims to: Address biodiversity loss, restore ecosystems and protect indigenous rights. The plan includes concrete measures to halt and reverse nature loss, including putting 30 per cent of the planet and 30 per cent of degraded ecosystems under protection by 2030. It also contains proposals to increase finance to developing countries – a major sticking point during talks.

    Goals

    • The GBF consists of four overarching global goals: to protect nature, including halting human-induced extinction of threatened species and reducing the rate of extinction of all species tenfold by 2050; sustainable use and management of biodiversity to ensure that nature’s contributions to people are valued, maintained and enhanced; fair sharing of the benefits from the utilization of genetic resources, and digital sequence information on genetic resources; and that adequate means of implementing the GBF be accessible to all Parties, particularly Least Developed Countries and Small Island Developing States.
    biodiversity

    Targets

    The GBF also features 23 targets to achieve by 2030, including:

    • Effective conservation and management of at least 30 per cent of the world’s land, coastal areas and oceans. Currently, 17 percent of land and *8 per cent of marine areas are under protection.
    • Restoration of 30 per cent of terrestrial and marine ecosystems
    • Reduce to near zero the loss of areas of high biodiversity importance and high ecological integrity
    • Halving global food waste
    • Phasing out or reforming subsidies that harm biodiversity by at least $500 billion per year, while scaling up positive incentives for biodiversity conservation and sustainable use
    • Mobilizing at least $200 billion per year from public and private sources for biodiversity-related funding
    • Raising international financial flows from developed to developing countries to at least US$ 30 billion per year
    • Requiring transnational companies and financial institutions to monitor, assess, and transparently disclose risks and impacts on biodiversity through their operations, portfolios, supply and value chains

    Reporting of the Outcomes

    • The countries will monitor and report every five years or less on a large set of indicators related to progress. The CBD will combine national information submitted by late February 2026 and late June 2029 into global trends and progress reports.

    Creation of a dedicated fund

    • The Global Environment Facility has been requested to establish a Special Trust Fund to support the implementation of the Global Biodiversity Framework (“GBF Fund”). This is to ensure successful implementation.
    • Delegates have agreed to establish within the GBF a multilateral fund for the equitable sharing of benefits between providers and users of digital sequence information on genetic resources (DSI), to be finalized at COP16 in Türkiye in 2024.

    Key outcomes of the Agreement

    [A] 30×30 Target

    • Delegates committed to protecting 30% of land and 30% of coastal and marine areas by 2030, fulfilling the deal’s highest-profile goal, known as 30-by-30.
    • Currently, 17% of terrestrial and 10% of marine areas are protected.
    • Indigenous and traditional territories will also count toward this goal, as many countries and campaigners pushed for during the talks.
    • The deal also aspires to restore 30% of degraded lands and waters throughout the decade, up from an earlier aim of 20%.
    • And the world will strive to prevent destroying intact landscapes and areas with a lot of species, bringing those losses “close to zero by 2030”.

    [B] Money for nature

    • Signatories aim to ensure $200 billion per year is channeled to conservation initiatives, from public and private sources.
    • Wealthier countries should contribute at least $20 billion of this every year by 2025, and at least $30 billion a year by 2030.

    [C] Big companies report impacts on biodiversity

    • Companies should analyse and report how their operations affect and are affected by biodiversity issues.
    • The parties agreed to large companies and financial institutions being subject to “requirements” to make disclosures regarding their operations, supply chains and portfolios.
    • This reporting is intended to progressively promote biodiversity, reduce the risks posed to businesses by the natural world, and encourage sustainable production.

    [D] Harmful subsidies

    • Countries committed to identifying subsidies that deplete biodiversity by 2025, and then eliminating, phasing out or reforming them.
    • They agreed to slash those incentives by at least $500 billion a year by 2030, and increase incentives that are positive for conservation.

    [E] Pollution and pesticides

    • One of the deal’s more controversial targets sought to reduce the use of pesticides by up to two-thirds.
    • But the final language to emerge focuses on the risks associated with pesticides and highly hazardous chemicals instead, pledging to reduce those threats by “at least half”, and instead focusing on other forms of pest management.
    • Overall, the Kunming-Montreal agreement will focus on reducing the negative impacts of pollution to levels that are not considered harmful to nature, but the text provides no quantifiable target here.

    [F] Monitoring and reporting progress

    • All the agreed aims will be supported by processes to monitor progress in the future, in a bid to prevent this agreement from meeting the same fate as similar targets that were agreed upon in Aichi, Japan, in 2010, and never met.
    • National action plans will be set and reviewed, following a similar format used for greenhouse gas emissions under U.N.-led efforts to curb climate change.
    • Some observers objected to the lack of a deadline for countries to submit these plans.

    India’s presence at the Conference

    • India was represented at the conference by Union Environment Minister Mr. Bhupendra Yadav.
    • India mainly put forward the arguments for supporting the case of developing countries and suggested for the creation of a biodiversity fund to help developing countries successfully implement the global framework.
    • India also called for the application of the ‘Common but Differentiated Responsibilities and Respective Capabilities’ (CBDR) principle while deciding the responsibilities of different countries as the developing countries bear most of the burden of climate change and, therefore, require adequate funding and technology transfer.

    Few concerns with the agreement

    • Activist organization Avaaz has pointed out that Goal A does not contain the 2030 milestones and enough numerical values anymore. This would make it difficult to assess whether or not the GBF leads to positive impacts on ecosystems. 
    • Avaaz also said there was still an imbalance between the amounts pledged in the text and real needs.
    • The framework text has indicated that the resources needed are up to $700 billion per year but the flows will be increased only to $200 billion per year by 2030. Avaaz said the framework should specify how this gap will be closed.  
    • There is now consensus that $200 billion will be made available every year from all sources by 2030. However, it is not clear how this funding would be disbursed. Some Parties favour the establishment of a stand-alone fund outside the existing funding structure while others want to improve the existing funding mechanisms.
    • Also, India’s Environment Minister Bhupender Yadav said that a numerical global target for pesticide reduction in the agriculture sector is unnecessary and must be left for countries to decide. The agriculture sector in India, like other developing countries, is the source of “life, livelihoods, and culture for hundreds of millions,”.
    • There is no 2030 target for increasing species population abundance. Some earlier drafts included details about enlarging the area of natural ecosystems by at least 5% by 2030, and these targets were removed.
    • The term “nature positive”, which scientists had said would be the biodiversity equivalent of “net zero”, did not make the final document. Many will see this as a missed opportunity – a unifying idea similar to keeping global heating to within 1.5C.
    • The main criticism of 30×30 (and other area-based conservation targets) is that implementing them risks violating human rights (original forest dwellers).

    Conclusion

    • This agreement means people around the world can hope for real progress to halt biodiversity loss and protect and restore our lands and seas in a way that safeguards our planet and respects the rights of indigenous peoples and local communities.
  • [Burning Issue] Skirmishes at the Line Of Actual Control

    line

    Context

    • Three months after the last round of troop disengagement in eastern Ladakh signaling restoration of peace, soldiers from India and China clashed once again, this time in Arunachal Pradesh.
    • This was contested by Indian troops firmly and resolutely. This face-off led to minor injuries to a few personnel from both sides.
    • In this context, this edition of the burning issue will analyze the LAC standoffs between India and China.

    Line of Actual Control Crisis- The Tawang Episode

    • Soldiers of the two sides clashed in Yangtse, in the upper reaches of the Tawang sector in Arunachal Pradesh on December 9, 2022.
    • PLA troops tried to transgress the LAC in Yangtse area of the Tawang Sector and unilaterally change the status quo.
    • Within Tawang, there are three “agreed areas” of differing Indian and Chinese perceptions of the LAC. Yangtse, which is about 25 km from Tawang town, north of the Lungroo grazing ground, is one of these areas.
    • As a result, it has been the site of regular “physical contact” between the Indian Army and the PLA, especially as the high ground is on the Indian side, giving it a commanding view of the Chinese side.
    • Both sides immediately disengaged from the area. As a follow-up to the incident, the Indian Army commander in the area held a flag meeting with his counterpart to discuss the issue in accordance with structured mechanisms to restore peace and tranquillity.

    Some previous LAC crisis incidents

    • Depsang in Ladakh, 2013: Chinese troops came across the LAC, pitched tents and refused to move for several weeks until New Delhi threatened to cancel the planned visit of Premier Li Keqiang to India. This might have been a diplomatic victory for the Indian government but it also highlighted the inability of the Indian military to bring an end to the standoff or the unwillingness of the government to let the military take the lead in responding.
    • Chumar in Ladakh, Sept 2014 in the middle of Xi Jinping’s first visit to India: Chinese intruded at Chumar, also in Ladakh, in the middle of Chinese President Xi Jinping’s first state visit to India. This was in keeping with a reasonably long tradition of Chinese transgressions during important visits but it was also notable for confronting Indian troops in an area where they enjoyed a degree of military advantage.
    • Doklam in 2017: China provoked India with infrastructure development in a third country in Bhutan’s Doklam territory. This was a case of China trying to browbeat an Indian treaty ally.
    • Transgression across multiple locations in 2020 and Galwan valley clash: The Chinese PLA took advantage of Covid-19 and a lack of Indian military alertness to transgress across multiple locations on the LAC in eastern Ladakh. On June 15, 2020 episode when 20 Indian soldiers were killed and several others were injured in violent clashes with the PLA troops in Ladakh’s Galwan Valley.

    Reasons for these skirmishes

    • Enforce own perception of LAC: The transgressions, patrol clashes, faceoffs and flag meetings to resolve it has been a common feature to dominate or enforce own claim or own perception of LAC China and will continue to be so till the LAC is demarcated.
    • Difficult terrain: Rivers, lakes and snowcaps along the frontier mean the line can shift, bringing soldiers face to face at many points, sparking a confrontation.
    • Competition to build infrastructure: The two nations are also competing to build infrastructure along the border, which is also known as the Line of Actual Control. India’s construction of a new road to a high-altitude air base is seen as one of the main triggers for a deadly 2020 clash with Chinese troops.
    • Promote nationalism and divert attention: Chinese President Xi Jinping may be attempting to stoke nationalistic fervor out of his aggressive nationalistic stance by playing the victim card to divert domestic discontent due to the Zero Covid policy, downslide in the Chinese economy and other reasons.
    • Increase financial cost for India: Unhappy with the fastest-growing economy, a faceoff in winter may activate political debate in democratic India, and the Indian government may be compelled to deploy more troops throughout winters in all sectors, thereby increasing the financial cost for India by LOCisation of LAC.
    • India’s infrastructure development: China enjoyed gross asymmetry in infrastructure development in its favour for too long and is not comfortable with Indian effort to catch up in this regard; hence disruption in development activities along borders suits its design.

    Other concerns in India-China Relation

    • Belt Road Initiative: India has objected to this, since its inception on grounds of violating its sovereignty pointing to China Pakistan Economic Corridor.
    • Non-reciprocal steps by China: India’s support to China on global issues has not led to Beijing’s reciprocation for instance. China opposed India’s permanent membership to UN Security Council and entry into NSG.
    • High trade deficit: India faces a trade imbalance heavily in favor of China. In 2017-18, the trade deficit has gone wide to US$62.9 billion in China’s favor.
    • Countering each other: China has expressed concerns about Indian military and economic activities in the disputed South China Sea. The same way India is also concerned about rising Chinese activities in the Indian Ocean.
    • China’s strong strategic bilateral relations with Pakistan and other neighboring countries like Nepal and Myanmar are the cause of concern as these countries act as buffer states.

    Possible solutions to LAC standoffs

    • Be ready for all contingencies: With no de-escalation by the Chinese in sight, India should continue to be ready for all contingencies with similar deployment along LAC, in the coming months/years, including creating some more leverage, if the situation demands so.
    • Prevent LOC-isation of LAC: The Indian aim should be not to concede Chinese attempt to redraw LAC, or LOC-isation of the LAC further.
    • Be proactive in dealing with China: A change in mindset is required, from being reactive to being proactive with additional intelligence, surveillance and offensive capability to demonstrate the capacity to encroach into Chinese sensitive areas, in absence of which China has assumed no threat from India, with the freedom to encroach anywhere, at will.
    • Pass a border defense law similar to China: If the Chinese have passed a Border Defence Law, India too should pass some laws to facilitate emphatic border construction and extend schemes under the Border Infrastructure Management Authority (BIMA) as near as the LAC as is practically feasible.
    • Capacity building: India must continue capacity building in all domains, including the maritime domain, where Chinese vulnerable sea lines of communications can be threatened. Besides ongoing infrastructure development along borders, the scope of the Border Area Management Programme (BAMP) needs to be enhanced.

    What are the options for India to learn from the past and see what lies ahead in India-China relations?

    • Inevitable Race: The prevailing tension on the China-India border is a symptom of the broader strategic competition between the two Asian neighbors.
    • Equal seriousness: Both sides should treat the military escalation along LAC with equal seriousness.
    • Armed coexistence: Even after the resolution of the present standoff in eastern Ladakh, both sides may be in a prolonged period of armed coexistence as a new normal. As the forces on both sides are likely to be relatively balanced, it would be advantageous for both to return to the agreements and understandings from 1993 onward and improve upon them. Clarifying the LAC is a crucial step in this effort.
    • Address trade imbalance: India has flagged the unsustainable trade imbalance at the front and center of the relationship, and this has gone unaddressed. China will need to work on resolving the trade deficit with India. At any rate, decoupling will happen selectively, in the same way, and for the same reasons that China is choosing to decouple from the United States. A balanced trade and economic relationship might lay a solid foundation for future relations, given the size of both economies.
    • Dialogue is necessary: Better understanding of each other’s regional initiatives through open dialogue is important to build trust. The Indo-Pacific vision is as much a developmental necessity for India as the BRI may be to China. Part of building trust must be an open discussion on each other’s intentions in key regions South Asia and the northern Indian Ocean and East Asia and the western Pacific as well as respect for each other’s special positions in the western Pacific and northern Indian Oceans.
    • Protect the core interest: The two sides would need to accommodate the legitimate interests of the other side on key partnerships: China’s with Pakistan and India’s with the United States. These may not be desirable, but in the current circumstances neither will give up its partners, and both India and China could talk through a modus vivendi on the red lines of concern.

    EAM S. Jaishankar’s Suggestion to deal with China

    • The External Affairs Minister suggested “Three Mutuals” and “Eight Broad Propositions” as a way forward for the relationship.
    • Three mutuals
    • Mutual Respect and Mutual Sensitivity to each other concerns and Mutual Interests to cooperate are the “determining factors” for India-China relations to grow.
    • Eight Major propositions
    • Adhering to commitment: The first proposition was that agreements already reached must be adhered to in their entirety, both in letter and in spirit.
    • Respect for LAC: Both sides also needed to strictly observe and respect the LAC, and any attempt to unilaterally change the status quo was completely unacceptable.
    • Maintaining peace and tranquillity: Peace and tranquillity in border areas were the basis for the development of the relationship in other domains. If that was disturbed, he said, the rest of the relationship would be too.
    • Broader partnership: The fourth proposition was that while both remain committed to a multipolar world, they should recognize that a multipolar Asia was one of its essential constituents.
    • Reciprocity: While each state had its interests, concerns and priorities, sensitivities to them could not be one-sided and relations were reciprocal. As rising powers, neither should ignore the other’s set of aspirations.
    • Divergences management: While both sides had made a common cause on development and economic issues and common membership of plurilateral groups was a meeting point, there were divergences when it came to interests and aspirations.
    • Civilizational ties: The last proposition was that as civilizational states, India and China must always take the long view.
    • Cooperation and competition: Even before the events of 2020, the relationship had reflected a duality of cooperation and competition.

    Conclusion

    • The two countries are standing at a crossroads, and this might be the final chance to take the path to the coexistence of cooperation and competition. If not, a new phase of antagonistic rivalry may be starting, with the countries sliding into possible confrontation as the strategic periphery of China collides with the strategic backyard of India in the Indian Ocean region.
    • Therefore, China and India should be “Good Neighbors, Good Friends,” as both countries are “important engines of the world economic growth.” By building on that theme, the two countries should “enhance dovetailing of the two countries’ development strategies” to build a “manufacturing partnership.”

    Click and get your FREE Copy of CURRENT AFFAIRS Micro Notes

    (Click) FREE 1-to-1 on-call Mentorship by IAS-IPS officers | Discuss doubts, strategy, sources, and more

  • [Burning issue] Wildlife (Protection) Amendment Bill, 2022

    wild

    Context

    • Rajya Sabha passed the Wildlife (Protection), Amendment Bill, 2022. The Lok Sabha passed the Bill in the Monsoon Session.
    • The amendment seeks to give effect to India’s obligations under the Convention on International Trade on Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (‘CITES’), which requires countries to regulate the trade of all listed specimens through permits.
    • In this context, this edition of the burning issue analyses the Wildlife (Protection) Amendment Bill, 2022.

    About the Wildlife Protection Act (WPA), 1972

    • WPA provides for the protection of the country’s wild animals, birds and plant species, in order to ensure environmental and ecological security.
    • It provides for the protection of a listed species of animals, birds and plants, and also for the establishment of a network of ecologically-important protected areas in the country.
    • It provides for various types of protected areas such as Wildlife Sanctuaries, National Parks etc.
    • The object and purpose of the WPA – to protect animals in their natural environment – was lent credence in the 42nd Constitutional Amendment Act,1976, which added the fundamental duty to “protect and improve … wildlife, and to have compassion for living creatures” under Article 51A(G).
    • This Amendment also inserted Article 48A in the Directive Principles of State Policy, which outlined the protection and safeguarding of wildlife as an ideal to be followed in the governance of the country.
    • There are six schedules provided in the WPA for the protection of wildlife species which can be concisely summarized as under:
    Schedule I:These species need rigorous protection and therefore, the harshest penalties for violation of the law are for species under this Schedule.
    Schedule II:Animals under this list are accorded high protection. They cannot be hunted except under threat to human life.
    Schedule III & IV:This list is for species that are not endangered. This includes protected species but the penalty for any violation is less compared to the first two schedules.
    Schedule V:This schedule contains animals which can be hunted.
    Schedule VI:This list contains plants that are forbidden from cultivation.

    About CITES

    • CITES stands for the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora.
    • It is an international agreement aimed at ensuring “that international trade in specimens of wild animals and plants does not threaten their survival”.
    • It was drafted after a resolution was adopted at a meeting of the members of the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) in 1963.
    • It entered into force on July 1, 1975, and now has 183 parties.
    • The Convention is legally binding on the Parties in the sense that they are committed to implementing it; however, it does not take the place of national laws.
    • India is a signatory to and has also ratified CITES convention in 1976.

    It has three appendices:

    • Appendix I includes species threatened with extinction. Trade-in specimens of these species are permitted only in exceptional circumstances.
    • Appendix II provides a lower level of protection.
    • Appendix III contains species that are protected in at least one country, which has asked other CITES Parties for assistance in controlling trade.

    Provisions of the Wildlife Protection Amendment Bill, 2022

    • In line with CITES: Insert a new Schedule for specimens listed in the Appendices under CITES.
    • Constitute a Standing Committee: Amendment to Section 6 to constitute Standing Committee to exercise such powers and duties as may be delegated to it by the State Board for Wildlife.
    • Elephant usage: Amendment to Section 43 to permit elephants, a Schedule I animal, to be used for ‘religious or any other purpose’.
    • Management authority for export/import: Insert Section 49E to empower the Central government to designate a Management Authority to grant export or import permits for the trade of specimens. It further requires every person possessing live specimens of scheduled animals to obtain a registration certificate from the Management Authority.
    • Create a scientific authority: Insert Section 49F to empower the Central government to designate a Scientific Authority to advise on aspects related to the impact on the survival of the specimens being traded. These provisions are set to ensure the “sustainable” exploitation of flora and fauna.
    • Better control of sanctuaries: The Bill seeks to regulate the control of sanctuaries. It provides that the Chief Wildlife Warden shall act in accordance with the management plans for the sanctuary, to be prepared as per Central guidelines.
    • Creation of conservation reserve: It also empowers both Central and State governments to declare areas adjacent to national parks and sanctuaries as conservation reserves, for protecting flora and fauna, and their habitat.
    • Managing alien invasive species: The Bill also empowers the Central government to regulate and stop the import, trade or possession of invasive plant or animal alien species.
    • Enhanced penalties: The Bill also enhances the penalties prescribed for violation of provisions of the Act. For ‘General violations’, the maximum fine is increased from Rs 25,000 to Rs. 1 lakh. In the case of Specially protected animals, the minimum fine of Rs. 10,000 has been enhanced to Rs. 25,000.

    Positive aspects of the bill

    • Enhanced Protection of wild animals: Bill seeks to enhance punishment for trade in animal and plant specimens.
    • Locals use of Protected Areas: the bill permits certain activities like grazing of livestock and community use of drinking water by local communities.
    • Ease of elephant ownership: The Bill seeks to amend Section 43 of the principal Act to permit the transfer or transport of a captive elephant for a religious or any other purpose by a person having a valid certificate of ownership.

    Negative aspects of the bill

    • Vague clause in section 43: The Bill seeks to amend Section 43 of the principal Act to permit the transfer or transport of a captive elephant for a religious or any other purpose by a person having a valid certificate of ownership. Many members raised concern about this provision, stating that the phrase “any other purpose” is vague and has the potential of encouraging the commercial trade of elephants, their captivity and brutality.
    • Silent of important issues: The government missed the opportunity to address the issues relating to Human-Wildlife conflict, Eco-sensitive zone rule, etc.
    • The schedule lists not complete: They pointed out that the species listed in all the 3 schedules of the Bill are incomplete as per the report submitted by the Parliamentary Standing Committee and a need was felt for greater inclusion of scientists, botanists, biologists in process of listing all existing species of wildlife.
    • Reduced role of states in wildlife management: Protection of wild animals and birds is a subject under the Concurrent List of the Constitution. the proposed amendment bill renders the State Boards for Wildlife chaired by Chief Ministers defunct and provides for establishing a Standing Committee of Board for Wildlife to be headed by the Forest Minister with a maximum of 10 nominated members. This injures the federal structure of India.
    • Against the fundamental objective of WPA: The new proviso creates a legal pathway to encourage the further commercialization and transfer of elephants through the vague wording of “religious or any other purpose.” This goes against the fundamental object and purpose of the WPA.

    Way forward

    • An additional mechanism may be introduced for acquiring animals for religious institutions.
    • The Management and Scientific Authorities contemplated under the Bill must take into account the strong principles of Federalism and ensure constructive engagement of State governments.
    • Clauses related to human-animal conflicts and eco-sensitive zones should also be added to the law to provide a legal framework to deal with these issues.
    • State’s wildlife bodies should be given due importance in the conservation of wildlife as the subject is a concurrent subject.

    Conclusion

    • The amendment bill tries to bring the WPA law up to date with the CITES mandate and present environment scenario.
    • However, several lacunas have been highlighted by environmental experts which need attention from the government and need to be fixed to bring out the best for the nation’s wildlife.

    Click and get your FREE Copy of CURRENT AFFAIRS Micro Notes

    (Click) FREE 1-to-1 on-call Mentorship by IAS-IPS officers | Discuss doubts, strategy, sources, and more

  • [Burning Issue] The G20 Grouping

    g20

    Context

    • On December 1, India assumed the presidency of the G20 forum, taking over from Indonesia. Prime Minister Narendra Modi called it a “huge opportunity for India”
    • In this context, this edition of the Burning Issue will talk about the G20 grouping and India’s presidency of the grouping next year.

    About G20

    • What: The Group of Twenty, or G20, is the premier forum for international cooperation on the most important aspects of the international economic and financial agenda. It brings together the world’s major advanced and emerging economies.
    • When: The G20 was created in response to both the financial crises that arose in a number of emerging economies in the 1990s and to a growing recognition that some of these countries were not adequately represented in global economic discussion and governance.
    • Who are the members? The G20 comprises Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, EU, France, Germany, India, Indonesia, Italy, Japan, Mexico, Russia, Saudi Arabia, South Africa, South Korea, Turkey, UK and USA.

    The objectives of the G20

    • Stability: The Group was formed with an aim of studying, reviewing, and promoting high-level discussion of policy issues pertaining to the promotion of international financial stability.
    • Fiscal responsibilities: The forum aims to pre-empt the balance of payments problems and turmoil in financial markets by improved coordination of monetary, fiscal, and financial policies.
    • Universal Support: The forum seeks to address issues that go beyond the responsibilities of any one organization.
    • Policy coordination between its members in order to achieve global economic stability and sustainable growth.

    Origin and Evolution

    • The G20 was created in response to both the financial crises that arose in a number of emerging economies in the 1990s and to a growing recognition that some of these countries were not adequately represented in global economic discussion and governance.
    • In December 1999, the Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors of advanced and emerging countries of systemic importance met for the first time in Berlin, Germany, for an informal dialogue on key issues for global economic stability.
    • Since then, Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors have met annually. India hosted a meeting of G20 finance ministers and central bank governors in 2002. G20 was raised to the Summit level in 2008 to address the global financial and economic crisis of 2008.

    Organizational Structure of G20

    • The G-20 operates without a permanent secretariat or staff. The chair rotates annually among the members and is selected from a different regional grouping of countries.
    • The chair is part of a revolving three-member management group of past, present and future chairs referred to as the Troika.
    • The preparatory process for the G20 Summit is conducted through the established Sherpa and Finance tracks that prepare and follow up on the issues and commitments adopted at the Summits.
    • The Sherpas’ Track focuses on non-economic and financial issues, such as development, anti-corruption and food security, while addressing internal aspects such as procedural rules of the G20 process. The Sherpas carry out important planning, negotiation and implementation tasks continuously.
    • The Finance Track focuses on economic and financial issues. The Sherpa and Finance track both rely on the technical and substantive work of a series of expert working groups. Additionally, the thematic agenda is developed through the organization of several Ministerial Meetings, such as the Joint Meeting of Finance and Development Ministers, and the Labour, Agriculture and Tourism Ministerial meetings.

    Significance of G20

    • Together, the G20 members represent 2/3rd of the world population, 85% of the global gross product, 75% of international trade, 80% of global investments in research and development.
    • These figures have remained relatively stable while the corresponding rates for Group of Seven (G7) nations, a smaller group of advanced democracies, have shrunk, as larger emerging markets take up a relatively greater share of the world’s economy.
    • The G20’s membership is still more representative of the current international balance of power than blocs of countries formed earlier, such as the G7.

    Economic significance of G20

    • Include developing countries also: G20 is a platform where the Leaders committed to work with developing countries, particularly low-income countries to support them in implementing their nationally driven policies and priorities which are needed to fulfil internationally agreed development goals, particularly the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) and reaffirmed their standstill commitment.
    • G20 provides policy coherence, analysis and practical tools to support growth and development. This helps G20 members to better target their cooperation with developing countries and can help amplify development efforts on the international agenda. It promotes inclusive societies and opportunities for all.
    • Coordinated work associated with G20 on human resources has helped many job-seekers with employment opportunities. The G20 members have and will continue to have, important implications for growth and development in Low-Income Developing Countries (LIDCs).
    • G20 plays a critical role in creating an enabling environment for inclusive global growth and development. Its work on ensuring financial stability, promoting growth and avoiding and managing crises is critical in supporting opportunities.
    • In turn, the increasing integration of developing countries into the global economy contributes to the G20’s objective of strong, sustainable, balanced and inclusive global growth.
    • The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development also sets an ambitious, transformative and universal agenda for sustainable development efforts. The G20 is well-placed to contribute to its implementation and can maximize its collective impact.

    Achievements of the G20 Group

    • It brought increased participation of emerging countries in global issues. It helped provide a platform for developing countries to interact with developed nations and become part of the global decision-making process.
    • The improvement in the regulations of the economies whose problems led to the crisis and the creation of safety nets to prevent problems in the future.
    • The G20 also specifically helped to provide emergency funds during the 2008 crisis and plays an important role in financing development.

    Shortcomings of the Group

    • No permanent secretariat: Simultaneously, the informal structure of the G20, with a rotating chair and no permanent secretariat, means that agendas are determined each year by the chair and so can swing widely, and formal mechanisms to monitor follow-through on countries’ public commitments are weak.
    • Considered Bias: The G20 is composed of 20 large and important economies. This creates a situation in which small countries have to follow their big brothers, in order to survive.
    • Failed to live up to the expectations: Finance ministers and heads of state now come to the table with their hands tied, their positions determined in advance by their governments and a formal script that precludes meaningful and creative compromises.
    • More showoff and less efficient: Meetings have become talkfests and photo opportunities. The willingness to come together in the hostile environment of late 2008 and early 2009 has entirely dissipated. The G20 agenda utterly fails to break with the tired, broken policies of the free market.
    • Lack of consensus: At recent summits, countries have struggled to reach a unified consensus—the hallmark of previous iterations of the conference—as the interests of high- and low-income economies continue to diverge.

    Bali G20 summit, 2022

    Indonesia has focused on three key pillars in its presidency of G20 presidency:

    • Global health architecture: president of Indonesia Joko Widodo talked about a global contingency fund for medical supplies, building capacity in developing countries to manufacture vaccines and the creation of global health protocols and standards.
    • Sustainable energy transition: as part of its roadmap to reach net zero by 2060, Indonesia had slashed the coverage area of forest fires sevenfold. The country has restored peatlands and rehabilitated 50,000 hectares of mangrove forests.
    • Digital transformation

    Opportunity for India: 2023 G20 India Summit

    • India’s presidency of the G20 grouping next year arguably the sole remaining effective forum for global governance presents an enormous opportunity to accelerate sustainable growth within India, in the emerging world, and beyond.

    1] Underlining the need for a new framework

    • Redefining common concerns: First, the presumed equality that we are all in the same boat, recognized in the case of climate change, needs to be expanded to other areas with a global impact redefining ‘common concerns’
    • Second, emerging economies are no longer to be considered the source of problems needing external solutions but a source of solutions to shared problems.
    • Ensuring adequate food, housing, education, health, water and sanitation and work for all should guide international cooperation.
    • Principles of common but differentiated responsibilities for improving the quality of life of all households can guide deliberations in other fora on problems that seem intractable in multilateralism based on trade and aid.

    2] Collaboration around science and technology

    •  The global agenda has been tilted towards investment, whereas science and technology are the driving force for economic diversification, sustainably urbanizing the world, and ushering the hydrogen economy and new crop varieties as the answer to both human well-being and global climate change.
    •  A forum to exchange experiences on societal benefits and growth as complementary goals would lead to fresh thinking on employment and the environment.

    3] Redefining digital access as a universal service

    • Harnessing the potential of the digital-information-technology revolution requires redefining digital access as a “universal service” that goes beyond physical connectivity to sharing specific opportunities available.
    • For global society to reap the fruits of the new set of network technologies, open-access software should be offered for more cost-effective service delivery options, good governance and sustainable development.

    4] Collaboration in space technology

    • Space is the next frontier for finding solutions to problems of natural resource management ranging from climate change-related natural disasters, and supporting agricultural innovation to urban and infrastructure planning.
    • Analysing Earth observation data will require regional and international collaboration through existing centers that have massive computing capacities, machine learning and artificial intelligence.

    5] Collaboration in the health sector

    • Public health has to learn from the COVID-19 fiasco with infectious diseases representing a market failure.
    • A major global challenge is the rapidly growing antimicrobial resistance which needs new antibiotics and collaboration between existing biotechnology facilities.

    6]  Avoiding strategic competition

    • Overriding priority to development suggests avoiding strategic competition.
    • Countries in the region will support building on the 1971 UNGA Declaration designating for all time the Indian Ocean as a zone of peace and non-extension into the region of rivalries and conflicts that are foreign to it.

    7] Reviving Global Financial Transaction Tax

    • A Global Financial Transaction Tax, considered by the G20 in 2011, needs to be revived to be paid to a Green Technology Fund for Least Developed Countries.

    Conclusion

    • The role of G20 has become more and more fierce and integral. A comprehensive and collective endeavor is a need for an hour for the institution to live.
    • Also, India’s presidency next year must leave the grouping with the agility and energy to respond to new realities, and it must create a future-ready multilateralism through a novel and robust institutional architecture.
    • It is said that “Those who hold the pen, write the rules”. The time has come for India to both hold the pen and write the rules for more equitable global economics and governance.

    Click and get your FREE Copy of CURRENT AFFAIRS Micro Notes

    (Click) FREE 1-to-1 on-call Mentorship by IAS-IPS officers | Discuss doubts, strategy, sources, and more

  • [Burning Issue] Monetary Policy Of RBI

    [Burning Issue] Monetary Policy Of RBI

    Context

    • Recently, the Reserve Bank of India’s (RBI) Monetary Policy Committee (MPC)  hiked the repo rate by 35 basis points (bps) to 6.25 per cent with immediate effect.
    • The RBI policy rate is now at its highest level since August 2018 and this is the fifth rate hike by the central bank in this financial year.
    • In this context, this edition of the Burning Issue will talk about the Monetary policy of RBI, the tools used by it and its analysis.

    What is monetary policy?

    • Monetary policy is the macroeconomic policy laid down by the central bank. It involves the management of money supply and interest rate and is the demand side economic policy used by the government of a country to achieve macroeconomic objectives like inflation, consumption, growth and liquidity.
    • Economic statistics such as GDP, the rate of inflation, and industry and sector-specific growth rates influence monetary policy strategy.
    • A central bank may revise the interest rates it charges to loan money to the nation’s banks. As rates rise or fall, financial institutions adjust rates for their customers such as businesses or home buyers.
    • Additionally, it may buy or sell government bonds, target foreign exchange rates, and revise the amount of cash that the banks are required to maintain as reserves.

    Goals of Monetary Policy

    • Control Inflation: Contractionary monetary policy is used to target a high level of inflation and reduce the level of money circulating in the economy.
    • Reduce Unemployment: An expansionary monetary policy decreases unemployment as a higher money supply and attractive interest rates stimulate business activities and expansion of the job market.
    • Manage Exchange Rates: The exchange rates between domestic and foreign currencies can be affected by monetary policy. With an increase in the money supply, the domestic currency becomes cheaper than its foreign exchange.

    Types of Monetary Policy: Expansionary and contractionary

    • Contractionary policy: A contractionary policy increases interest rates and limits the outstanding money supply to slow growth and decrease inflation, where the prices of goods and services in an economy rise and reduce the purchasing power of money.
    • Expansionary policy: During times of slowdown or a recession, an expansionary policy grows economic activity. By lowering interest rates, saving becomes less attractive, and consumer spending and borrowing increase.

    Monetary policy in India and the Role of RBI

    • Aim of Monetary Policy: In India, the monetary policy of the Reserve Bank of India is aimed at managing the quantity of money to meet the requirements of different sectors of the economy and to increase the pace of economic growth.
    • Tools of Monetary Policy: The RBI implements the monetary policy through open market operations, bank rate policy, reserve system, credit control policy, moral persuasion and through many other instruments. Using any of these instruments will lead to changes in the interest rate or the money supply in the economy.
    • Types of Monetary policy: It can be expansionary and contractionary in nature. Increasing the money supply and reducing interest rates indicate an expansionary policy. The reverse of this is a contractionary monetary policy.
    • For instance, liquidity is important for an economy to spur growth. To maintain liquidity, the RBI is dependent on the monetary policy. By purchasing bonds through open market operations, the RBI introduces money into the system and reduces the interest rate.

    Monetary policy tools of RBI

    [A] Quantitative tools

    Bank Rate Policy

    • The bank rate is the minimum rate at which the central bank of a country provides a loan to the commercial bank of the country.
    • Bank rate is also called discount rate because the central bank provides finance to commercial banks by rediscounting bills.
    • The RBI uses bank rate to control credit in the economy.

    Open Market Operations

    • OMO are another important instrument of credit control.
    • OMO means the purchase and sale of securities by the RBI.
    • For instance, in an inflationary scenario, the RBI will start selling government securities, the selling of securities will reduce the money supply from the system (Since the buyer of the securities will pay for them in Rupee, hence currency from the system goes out), reduction in money supply will lead to a reduction in funds with the commercial banks, which further reduce their lending capability. A fall in lending thus contracts credit in the economy.

    Cash Reserve Ratio

    • Banks in India are required to keep certain proportions of their deposits in the form of cash with themselves as reserves.
    • If the legal CRR is 10%, then the bank will have to keep Rs 100 as reserves against the deposit of Rs 1000.

    Liquidity Adjustment Facility

    • LAF is a monetary policy instrument which allows commercial banks and primary dealers to borrow money through repurchase agreements or Repos/reverse repos.
    • LAF is used to aid banks in adjusting day-to-day fluctuations in liquidity.
    • RBI extends LAF facility only to commercial banks (excluding RRBs) and Primary dealers.
    • LAF allowed banks to park their excess money with the RBI in case of excess liquidity or to avail liquidity from the RBI at the time of deficit on an overnight basis against the collateral of government securities.

    Repo and reverse repo

    • Repos or Repurchase Agreements is an instrument which allows banks to borrow money from the RBI to manage short-term needs of liquidity against the selling of government securities with an agreement to repurchase the same government securities at a predetermined date and rate. The rate at which the RBI lends to the banks is called Repo Rate.
    • Reverse Repo is an instrument which allows the RBI to borrow from the banks by lending government securities. The rate at which the Banks lend to the RBI is called Reverse Repo Rate.
    • Repo injects money into the system whereas Reverse Repo takes money out of the system.
    • The RBI increases the Repo Rate during the time of inflation and decreases the Repo Rate during the time of deflation and low growth.

    Marginal Standing Facility

    • MSF is a new scheme announced by the RBI in the year 2011-12.
    • MSF is a penal rate at which banks can borrow money from the RBI over and above what they can borrow from the RBI under the LAF window.
    • MSF is a penal rate and is always fixed at a higher rate than the Repo rate.
    • The MSF would be a penal rate for banks, and the banks can borrow funds by pledging government securities within the limits of the statutory liquidity ratio.
    • The scheme has been introduced by RBI with the main aim of reducing volatility in the overnight lending rates in the inter-bank market and enabling smooth monetary transmission in the financial system.

    Statutory Liquidity Ratio

    • SLR is the percentage of the deposits that the banks have to hold with themselves in highly liquid government securities.
    • SLR is one of the many arrows in the RBI’s monetary policy quiver. These are used, sometimes in isolation, sometimes in combination, to manage the money supply, interest rates and credit availability in the country.
    • The SLR is an important tool of monetary policy, and its primary aim is to ensure that banks always have enough liquidity (cash and cash equivalent securities) to honour depositors’ demands and that they don’t lend away all their funds.

    Bank Base Rate

    • The Base Rate is the minimum interest rate of a bank below which it is not permissible to lend, except in some cases if allowed by the RBI.
    • BR is the minimum interest rate that a bank must charge because below the base rate it is not viable for the bank to lend.
    • The base rate, introduced with effect from 1st July 2011 by the Reserve Bank of India, is the new benchmark rate for lending operations of banks.
    • Thus, all categories of domestic rupee loans should be priced only with reference to the Base Rate.

    [B] Qualitative Measure of the RBI

    Fixing Margin Requirements

    • The margin refers to the “proportion of the loan amount which is not financed by the bank”. Or in other words, it is that part of a loan which a borrower has to raise in order to get finance for his purpose.
    • For example, If the RBI feels that more credit supply should be allocated to the agriculture sector, then it will reduce the margin and even 85-90 per cent loan can be given.

    Consumer Credit Regulation

    • Under this method, consumer credit supply is regulated through hire-purchase and instalment sale of consumer goods. Under this method, the down payment, instalment amount, loan duration, etc., is fixed in advance. This can help in checking credit use and then inflation in a country.

    Publicity

    • This is yet another method of selective credit control. Through it, Central Bank (RBI) publishes various reports stating what is good and what is bad in the system. This published information can help commercial banks to direct credit supply in the desired sectors. Through its weekly and monthly bulletins, the information is made public, and banks can use it for attaining goals of monetary policy.

    Credit Rationing

    • Central Bank fixes credit amount to be granted. Credit is rationed by limiting the amount available for each commercial bank. This method controls even bill rediscounting. For certain purpose, the upper limit of credit can be fixed, and banks are told to stick to this limit. This can help in lowering banks credit exposure to unwanted sectors.

    Moral Suasion

    • It implies pressure exerted by the RBI on the Indian banking system without any strict action for compliance with the rules. It is a suggestion to banks. It helps in restraining credit during inflationary periods. Commercial banks are informed about the expectations of the central bank through monetary policy. Under moral suasion, central banks can issue directives, guidelines and suggestions for commercial banks regarding reducing credit supply for speculative purposes.

    New Monetary Policy Framework: The MPC and Inflation Targeting

    What is Monetary Policy Agreement?

    • In 2015 The Government of India and the Reserve Bank of India signed a Monetary Policy Framework Agreement. The new monetary policy framework was formed following the recommendations of a committee headed by RBI Deputy Governor Urjit Patel.
    • The objective of monetary policy framework is to primarily maintain price stability while keeping in mind the objective of growth.
    • As per the agreement, RBI would set the policy interest rates and would aim to bring inflation below 6 per cent by January 2016 and within 4 per cent with a band of (+/-) 2 per cent for 2016-17 and all subsequent years.
    • The central bank will be deemed to have missed its target if consumer inflation is at more than 6 percent or at less than 2 percent for three consecutive quarters starting in the 2015/16 fiscal year.
    • If the central bank misses the inflation target, it will send a report to the government citing reasons and remedial actions.
    • The central bank will also need to give an estimated time period within which it expects to return to the target level.

    Significance of Monetary Policy Agreement 

    • While the agreement gives a free hand to the RBI Governor to decide on the monetary policy measures to achieve the inflation target, it also requires the RBI to give out to the Central Government a report in case the target is missed for some time. Thus, it is a fine balance between autonomy and accountability.
    • The World over, the Central banks are moving towards an inflation targeting based criteria for managing monetary policy. The MPA is a step in that direction.
    • The MPA will put India into the League of Nations that followed a rule-based monetary policy mechanism.

    Monetary policy committee

    • The monetary policy committee framework will replace the current system where the RBI governor and his internal team have complete control over monetary policy decisions. While a technical advisory committee advises the RBI on monetary policy decisions, the central bank is under no obligation to accept its recommendations.
    • The committee will have six members, with three appointed by the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) and the remaining nominated by an external selection committee. The RBI governor will have the casting vote in case of a tie.
    • According to the Finance Bill, the committee will consist of the RBI governor, the deputy governor in charge of monetary policy and one official nominated by the central bank.
    • The other three members will be appointed by the central government through a search committee.
    • This search committee will comprise the cabinet secretary, the secretary of the Department of Economic Affairs, the RBI governor and three experts in the field of economics or banking as nominated by the central government.
    • The members of the MPC appointed by the search committee shall hold office for a period of four years and shall not be eligible for re-appointment.
    • The idea to set up a monetary policy committee was mooted by an RBI-appointed committee led by deputy governor Urjit Patel in 2014.

    Assessment of the Monetary Policy of RBI

    Achievements

    • The overall requirements of expanding economic activities have been met adequately.
    • In respect of priority sectors, for example, the objective of providing 40 percent of the bank credit has been met.
    • Again, the funding of several important development programmes for the weaker sections of the population has been reasonably satisfactory.
    • Even in respect of the control of inflation, the monetary policy has fared well. Overall, inflation has remained in the desired bracket except in a few instances.

    Failures

    • The most unsatisfactory result has been in respect of the expansion of the money supply. The growth rate of money has been much more than the growth in real products.
    • Another shortcoming lies in the allocation of funds to various areas of sectors. The imbalances in credit allocation are more pronounced when one considers agriculture and small industry on the one hand and the large, organised industry and service sector on the other.
    • Agriculture continues to be dependent upon money lenders to a considerable extent for its credit needs. Very small industries, mostly in the unorganised sector, have virtually no institutional source for funds.
    • Also, there has been criticism that the new monetary policy framework has reduced RBI’s role to just inflation manager with little help from government fiscal policy.
    • Transmission of changes in policy rates is not fairly transferred by commercial banks to consumers. For example, In terms of the marginal cost lending rate (MCLR) by the banks (as per the data released by the RBI), the rate reduction was only 10 bps against the reduction of 250 bps by the RBI.

    Conclusion

    • Thus, monetary policy holds an important role in a country’s growth and development.
    • Till now, the monetary policy has fared well but there is a need to enhance the transmission of changes made to it by RBI to get better outcomes and impacts on the economy.

    Click and get your FREE Copy of CURRENT AFFAIRS Micro Notes

    (Click) FREE 1-to-1 on-call Mentorship by IAS-IPS officers | Discuss doubts, strategy, sources, and more

  • [Burning Issue] Cyber security threats to India

    [Burning Issue] Cyber security threats to India

    Context

    • On November 23, 2022, the premier medical institute in the country, the All India Institute of Medical Sciences New Delhi (AIIMS) was crippled by a major cyber-attack.
    • A few days later, another premier hospital, Safdarjung hospital also witnessed a cyber attack. In the past also, witnessed several cyber attacks on its critical infrastructure assets.
    • In this context, this edition of the Burning Issue will analyze the issue of cyber security and threats to India.

    What is cyberspace?

    • A global domain within the information environment consisting of the interdependent network of information technology infrastructures, including the Internet, telecommunications networks, computer systems, and embedded processors and controllers.

    The situation of Cyber Connectivity in India

    • 3rd highest internet users: India ranks 3rd in terms of the highest number of internet users in the world after the USA and China, the number has grown 6-fold between 2012-2017 with a compound annual growth rate of 44%.
    • Rapid digitalization under progress: India has witnessed rapid digitalization in almost all spheres of public life. There is greater and easy access to financial services even for rural populations. Missions like Make in India and Digital India are creating a positive ripple effect across the economy.

    What are Cyber Security Threats?

    • Cyber Security is protecting our cyberspace (critical infrastructure) from attack, damage, misuse and economic espionage.
    • Cyber Intrusions and Attacks have increased dramatically over the last decade, exposing sensitive personal and business information, disrupting critical operations, and imposing high costs on the economy.
    • While traditional businesses are adopting e-platforms to widen their reach, new businesses based solely on new technologies like social, mobile, analytics and cloud (SMAC) are growing at breakneck speed. The Internet of Things (IoT)1, where interconnected devices could monitor various aspects of professional and personal life using internet-based technology, is fast becoming a reality.
    • Although smart devices connected to the internet will make lives simpler, they are also likely to expose individuals and organizations to cyber threats.
    • Cyber-attacks can vary in nature and include scenarios – such as the introduction of malicious software like trojans, worms, viruses and spyware; password phishing; and denial-of-service attacks intended to crash websites.
    • Any successful cyberattack on a critical asset such as a power grid will have a multiplier effect, crippling communications, and transportation and even endangering the health and safety of citizens.

    Cyber security situation in India

    • Top 10 spam-sending countries: India secures a spot amongst the top 10 spam-sending countries in the world alongside the USA.
    • One of the most affected countries: India was ranked among the top five countries to be affected by cybercrime, according to a 22 October report by online security firm Symantec Corp.
    • India witnessed over 18 million cyber-attacks and threats, at an average of nearly 200,000 threats every day, in the first three months of 2022, according to the cyber security firm, Norton.

    Famous examples of Cyber-Attacks in India

    • In May 2021, the national airline Air India reported a cyber-attack in which the data of 4.5 million of its customers across the world, was compromised.
    • In October 2019, there was an attempted cyber-attack on the Kudankulam Nuclear power plant.
    • In February 2022, a suspected ransomware attack briefly knocked out the management information system (MIS) at Jawaharlal Nehru Port Container Terminal (JNPCT), one of five marine facilities in India’s top container gateway of JNPT (Nhava Sheva).

    Impacts of Cyber Security Breaches

    • Compromise integral defense systems: Tactical teams trained in cyber warfare have been deployed to attack critical infrastructure to compromise integral defence systems and infrastructure. 
    • Huge ransom demands: A growing number of miscreants are holding large companies ransom through systemic attacks and ransomware. Recently, in India, a large power company’s operations were compromised due to a ransomware attack.
    • Increases risk of fraud, data breaches: These incidents increase an organization’s risk of fraud, intellectual property theft, network incapacitation and damage to brand and corporate reputation – all of which can have far-reaching and expensive consequences.

    Steps taken to bolster cyber security infrastructure in India

    • Legal framework: There are two legislations: The Information Technology Act 2000, provides the legal framework for addressing cybercrimes and cyberattacks. Criminal countermeasures include the use of this Act along with the Indian Penal Code.
    • Administrative: The Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (MeitY) is responsible for cyber security. The Computer Emergency Response Team, CERT-IN, an office within MeitY, is the nodal agency for dealing with cyber security threats. CERT-IN also augments the security-related defence of the Indian Internet domain.
    • Institutional: Several other government agencies are involved in dealing with cyber security and allied issues. The National Security Council Secretariat is the central coordinating body for cybersecurity and internet governance. The National Critical Information Infrastructure Protection Center (NCIIPC) focuses on cyber threats to critical information infrastructure and has been successful. The Cyber and Information Security Division (C&IS) of the Ministry of Home Affairs, is also concerned with cybersecurity and cybercrime
    • Policy: India’s National Cyber Policy, 2013 is up for an overhaul and a new National Cybersecurity policy will be announced in the near future.
    • Coordination with states: The Indian Cybercrime Co-ordination Centre (I4C) established by the Ministry of Home Affairs, acts as a nodal point in the response against cybercrime by coordinating with state police forces across the country. It also co-ordinates the implementation of mutual legal assistance treaties (MLAT) with other countries.
    • Intelligence wing: The National Technical Research Organisation (NTRO) is a technical intelligence agency under the National Security Advisor in the Prime Minister’s Office. The NCIIPC works within the NTRO.
    • Improved rankings: With continuous efforts at improvement, India has moved up 37 places to be ranked 10th in the Global Cybersecurity Index 2020 (GCI), according to a report by the International Telecommunication Union (ITU)

    What more can be done: The Way Forward

    • Private sector participation: Companies like Mastercard which have decades of global expertise in managing such risks and creating architecture that mitigate them can help build and strengthen cybersecurity systems.
    • Active roles of governments: Governments, both at the state and central level as well as industry will need to play an active role in spreading awareness and training individuals.
    • Strengthening the trifecta of policy, infrastructure and awareness: A large part of India’s population is digitally literate but unaware of basic security measures. As India embarks on its Techade of growth and global leadership, the trifecta of policy, infrastructure and awareness will be imperative to ensure that digital growth does not come at the cost of compromised cybersecurity.
    • A whole-of-nation approach must be followed: This requires a comprehensive national risk assessment in line with the criticality of Indian assets and capabilities of the adversaries. It must be done by engaging stakeholders and creating a trusted information-sharing mechanism.
    • A clear governance structure for organizations: mandated with cybersecurity and cyber crisis management, with a proper mandate clarifying the roles and responsibilities of different bodies, should be established to take stock of existing policies practices and capabilities.
    • Creating a massive information-sharing mechanism: Stakeholders Including different state and central government departments, law enforcement and even corporates should also be engaged through a wide consultation and information-sharing mechanism to create baseline security benchmarks, and test them by organizing regular security drills, thereby augmenting incident response capabilities.
    • Promote PPP model: The government must act as a facilitator and create a public-private partnership and lay adequate stress on user awareness and education. Most importantly, privacy and security should be balanced while handling cybercrime and fostering R&D to maintain a position of dominance in cyberspace.
    • International cooperation: India must be a part of international cooperation efforts to promote responsible behavior in cyberspace. The country is still not a signatory to several conventions including the Budapest Convention. The two-decade-old Budapest Convention can be updated and made more democratic by taking into account the concerns of the developing world, where the majority of the world’s future consumers are from.

    Conclusion

    • As cybersecurity will continue to remain a potent factor in India’s digital ecosystem, all stakeholders must focus on a collaborative approach to develop formidable solutions that can create safer digital spaces.
    • The role of policymakers will be equally crucial as they can help the industry in catalyzing innovation and bringing new solutions to the market at a faster pace and with enhanced agility.
  • [Burning Issue] CCUS Policy Framework of NITI Aayog

    [Burning Issue] CCUS Policy Framework of NITI Aayog

    Context

    • A report titled ‘Carbon Capture, Utilisation, and Storage (CCUS) Policy Framework and its Deployment Mechanism in India’ has been released by NITI Aayog.
    • The report explores the importance of technology as an emission reduction strategy to achieve deep decarbonization from the hard-to-abate sectors. This edition of Burning Issue will highlight the key aspects of this report.   

    What is CCUS?

    • The International Energy Agency (IEA) defines Carbon Capture, Utilization and Storage (CCUS) as a group of technologies for capturing CO2 from large and stationary CO2 emitting sources, such as fossil fuel-based power plants and other industries.
    • CCUS also involves the transport of the captured CO2 (typically by pipeline and in certain situations through shipping, rail or trucks also) to sites, either for utilization in different applications or injection into geological formations or depleted oil & gas fields for permanent storage and trapping of the CO2.

    Significance of CCUS technologies

    CCUS can contribute to decarbonization and transition to clean energy systems in various ways:

    • Hard-to-abate sectors: CCUS offers the only known technology for the decarbonization of hard-to-electrify CO2-intensive sectors such as steel, cement, oil & gas, petrochemicals & chemicals, and fertilizers.
    • Creation Low carbon hydrogen economy: CCUS is expected to play a major role in enabling the hydrogen economy in India, through the production of blue hydrogen based on the utilization of our rich endowments of coal.
    • Removal of the CO2 stock from the atmosphere: The race towards net zero and containing global temperature within 1.5 degrees from pre-industrial levels is not possible without the removal of excess CO2 from the atmosphere through Direct Air Capture (DAC).
    • Sustenance of existing emitters: Existing thermal power plants and industrial plants (such as steel and cement production facilities) can be retrofitted with CO2 capture infrastructure.

    Need for CCUS in India

    • Growing CO2 emissions: India is the 3rd largest emitter of CO2 in the world after China and the US, with estimated emissions of 2.6 gigatonnes per annum (gtpa) in 2019. With rapid economic growth, infrastructure and industrial development, as well as a growing population, the total CO2 emissions are expected to cross 4 gtpa by the year 2030.
    • Sustainable solutions for the decarbonization of sectors -The decarbonization challenge for India is to identify scalable and economically sustainable solutions for the decarbonization of sectors that contribute to 70% of emissions. CCUS has a critical role to play, especially for India to accomplish net zero by 2070.
    • Enabling clean and green energy generation: CCUS also has a role to play in enabling clean and green baseload power and ensuring the sustenance and non-stranding of our over 210 GW of coal and lignite-based thermal power plants.
    • Limit global temperature rise- The International Energy Agency points out that reaching net zero without CCUS is virtually impossible. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) also concludes that without CCUS, it would not be possible to stabilize the CO2 concentration in the atmosphere between 450 – 750 ppmv (parts per million by volume) and limit global temperature rise between 1.5 to 2 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels.
    • Fulfill commitments of the Paris Agreement and ‘Panchamrit Strategy’-As a signatory of the Paris Agreement 2015, India has committed to reducing emissions by 50% by the year 2050 and reaching net zero by 2070. Given the sectoral composition and sources of CO2 emissions in India, CCUS will have an important and integral role to play in ensuring India meets its stated climate goals, through the deep decarbonization of energy and CO2 emission-intensive industries such as thermal power generation, steel, cement, oil & gas refining, and petrochemicals.
    • Enabling sunrise sectors- CCUS can enable the production of clean products while utilizing our rich endowments of coal, reducing imports and thus leading to a strong Indian economy. CCUS also has an important role to play in enabling sunrise sectors such as coal gasification and the nascent hydrogen economy in India.

    Current usage of CCUS in India

    • Presently carbon capture in India is confined to certain industries/applications where carbon capture is part of the process, viz., the manufacture of urea. India’s urea production is about 24 mtpa, where captured CO2 is utilized in the ammonia-to urea conversion process.
    • CO2 is also captured as part of the gas conditioning process in the gasifiers of Reliance Industries Limited in Jamnagar (10 mtpa of petcoke gasification capacity) and JSPL in Angul (2 mtpa of coal gasification capacity), but the CO2 is largely released to the atmosphere and not utilized or stored.
    • While there are few pilot-scale carbon capture projects (viz. IOCL R&D’s amine and biological enzyme-based carbon capture plant and Tata Steel Jamshedpur’s pilot-scale carbon capture plant for capturing 5 tonnes per day CO2 from Blast Furnace gases), there are no commercial-scale dedicated CCUS projects in India.

    Carbon Capture and Storage Technologies

    CO2 capture technologies separate carbon dioxide from gas streams that are released from industrial processes such as power plants, chemical production, cement production or steel making. There are three different broad categories of technologies for capturing CO2: Post-combustion capture, Pre-combustion and Oxy-fuel combustion.

    • Cryogenic separation for CO2 capture is similar to the conventional distillation process, except that it involves the separation of components from a gaseous mixture (instead of liquid) based on the difference in their boiling points.
    • In the adsorption-based CO2 capture process, the CO2 molecules selectively adhere to the surface of the adsorbent material and form a film. This is possible because of the difference in diffusivities and heat of adsorption values for the feed gas stream components.
    • Solvent-based CO2 capture processes have been used for over half a century for processing natural (sour) gas, combustion flue gas and Fischer-Tropsch (FT) synthesis products. The fundamental principle on which solvent-based CO2 capture technologies work is the ‘selective absorption’ of CO2 over the other gaseous constituents.
    • Microalgae-Based Carbon Capture– The basic philosophy behind the process of carbon capture by microalgae is the use of CO2 as a nutrient for the cultivation of microalgae. The selected strains of microalgae can be cultivated in ponds. The CO2 will be absorbed by the microalgae and the resulting gas will leave the cultivation system.

    Utilization of the carbon captured

    • Green urea: Green urea can be produced from the captured CO 2 and cost-competitive green hydrogen, from renewable energy-based electrolysis of water. Green urea can replace/complement the traditional LNG/NG-based production and import of ammonia and urea.
    • Food and beverages applications: CO2 is utilized in F&B applications such as carbonated drinks, dry ice, and modified atmosphere packing; however, the scales are much lower compared to green urea.
    • Building materials (concrete and aggregates): There is a large market for aggregates and concrete in a developing country like India, providing a pathway for utilizing CO2 for producing building materials through concrete curing and aggregate formation. In these applications, CO2 is injected in a liquid state without any conversion, thus reducing energy requirements.
    • Chemicals (methanol and ethanol): Conversion of CO2 to methanol and ethanol from CO2 is proven at a commercial scale in different parts of the world.
    • Polymers (including bio-plastics): The conversion of CO2 to polymers presents another possible CO2 utilization route.

    Storage of the carbon captured

    • Storage in oil wells– The injection of CO2 for Enhanced Oil Recovery has been studied and applied for years, especially in North America. CO2 is miscible with crude oil which helps in recovering oil not possible by secondary methods. This also helps in permanently storing CO2 in oil reservoirs, thus making CO2 EOR a sustainable option for abating CO2.
    • Storage in coal seams- The CO2 injected is accumulated in the coal cleats in a dense gas phase. This CO2 is adsorbed and absorbed in the coal. Since CO2 has a higher affinity for coal than CBM, it pushes the coal bed methane toward production wells, thus enhancing its primary recovery. Similar to CO2 EOR, ECBMR can help in permanently storing CO2 and the recovered methane can also help offset the cost of carbon capture.
    • Storage in Deep Saline Aquifers– Captured CO2 can be permanently stored in deep saline aquifers. Unlike EOR and ECBMR, injection of CO2 in deep saline aquifers has no economic benefit. Deep saline aquifers are spread across very large areas and thus have the potential to store very large quantities of CO2.
    • CO2 Storage in Basalts– Recently studies have been carried out to learn about the CO2 storage potential of basaltic rocks. Basaltic rock constitutes divalent cations of Ca, Mg, and Fe. They can react with the CO2 dissolved in water to form stable carbonate minerals and thus can offer a safe CO2 sequestration method for an extended period.

    Policy framework for India

    Key Risks Associated with CCUS

    • Technical Risks– such as Reservoir Suitability for CO2 Flooding for EOR and the extent of CO2 abatement possible through EOR depend on the comparative performance and cost-effectiveness of CO2.
    • Financial Risks– Cost of Capture The main cost driver in the CCUS value chain is the capture cost. In industrial processes such as natural gas processing and gasification, carbon capture is part of the process itself and hence there is no additional cost of carbon capture. However, in the case of thermal power plants and other industrial processes, there are significant capital and cash costs, leading to financial risks for the entire CCUS value chain.
    • Loss of Storage Site– Complications during CO2 injection may lead to the stoppage of operations at CO2 storage sites. Although reservoir management should provide adequate warning of such occurrences, there are technical risks in Carbon Capture Utilization and Storage (CCUS) – Policy Framework and Deployment Mechanism in India CCUS Policy Framework for India estimating/predicting the final capacity of a new storage site with certainty.

    Promoting the Adoption of CCUS Technologies in India: The Way Forward

    • The envisaged CCUS policy needs to adopt a multi-pronged approach to promote the adoption of CCUS technologies in India. The key elements of the approach need to incentivize the following: i) Technology transfer:
    • Technology transfer, Assimilation and Adoption– Carbon capture, CO2 sequestration and CO2 EOR technologies are already demonstrated at a commercial scale in different parts of the world and particularly in the US for nearly 50 years. Hence the focus for India should be on technology transfer, assimilation and adoption of such proven technologies (TRL 8 and 9), rather than reinventing the wheel.
    • Promoting R&D in novel technologies: While carbon capture technologies and technologies for CO2 EOR and sequestration are well developed and implemented at a commercial scale, technologies for the utilization of CO2 are relatively less developed.
    • Private sector participation: Private sector participation is quintessential to promote the transfer and commercialization of existing CCUS technologies and also push the envelope for the development of new and emerging technologies in both capture and utilization.
    • Carbon Capture Finance Corporation (CCFC)– It is proposed that the Government of India set up a financial institution for the promotion and development of CCUS projects in India. The financial institution, which can be called the “Carbon Capture Finance Corporation (CCFC)” shall provide tax and cash credits for carbon capture projects in India.
    • Promoting Coal Gasification Projects with CCUS-Coal gasification (with CCUS) is an important and strategic sector for ensuring the future energy and materials security of India and reducing import-dependence for critical chemicals and commodities. It is recommended to set up a special purpose organization to drive and promote coal gasification in India, including the production of blue hydrogen to enable the hydrogen economy.

    Conclusion

    • Carbon Capture Utilization and Storage (CCUS) has an important and critical role to play for India to halve CO2 emissions by 2050 and accomplish net zero by 2070.
    • Energy transitions take decades and hence it is important to implement the framework and policy instruments for CCUS to become a reality in India and make a meaningful contribution to decarbonization in India.

    Click and get your FREE Copy of CURRENT AFFAIRS Micro Notes

    (Click) FREE1-to-1 on-call Mentorship by IAS-IPS officers | Discuss doubts, strategy, sources, and more

  • [Burning issue] The tussle between Executive and Judiciary

    [Burning issue] The tussle between Executive and Judiciary

    Context

    • Recently, the Supreme court asked the Centre to produce in 24 hours the file related to the appointment of former bureaucrat Arun Goel as an EC so as to demonstrate how ECs are chosen.
    • In reply to it, Solicitor general (SG) Tushar Mehta urged the court not to traverse through a path that may disturb the constitutional scheme of separation of power.
    • The incident highlights the tussle between the two branches of the state- the executive and judiciary. This edition of the burning issue will analyse this issue in length.

    Previous incidences of the tussle

    • Fundamental Rights vs DPSP: The tussle between the judiciary and executive began when the judiciary defended the fundamental Rights in the Golak Nath Case,1967 against the supremacy of legislature (Parliament) established by the executive under the leadership of Mrs. Indira Gandhi, the Prime Minister of India.
    • Shield of “Basic Structure”: Mrs. Indira Gandhi in her next move got the three arbitrary constitutional Amendment Acts in 1971. The judiciary in response established the “Doctrine of Basic Structure‟ of the constitution through the Kesavanda Bharti case,1973.
    • Struck down of NJAC– The NJAC judgment was a crucial turning point leading to the present confrontation. No doubt, there always has been a certain amount of creative tension but NJAC judgment became the tipping point. 
    • Struck down of tribunal ordinance: Supreme Court struck down the Tribunal Reforms (Rationalisation and Conditions of Service) Ordinance of 2021
    • Displeasure over Delays in clearing recommendations of collegium: The Supreme Court expressed anguish over the delay by the Centre in clearing the names recommended by the Collegium for appointment as judges in the higher judiciary, saying it “effectively frustrates” the method of appointment.

    What does the constitution say about it?

    • Division of powers: The constitution of India divided the power and authority among three organs of government –executive, legislature and judiciary.
    • Article 50: The article puts an obligation on the State to separate the judiciary from the executive. But, since this falls under the Directive Principles of State Policy, it is not enforceable.
    • Article 123: The President, being the executive head of the country, is empowered to exercise legislative powers (Promulgate ordinances) in certain conditions.
    • Articles 121: No discussions shall take place in Parliament with respect to the conduct of any Judge of the Supreme Court or of a High Court in the discharge of his duties except upon a motion for presenting an address to the President praying for the removal of the Judge as hereinafter provided.
    • Article 211: This provides that the legislatures cannot discuss the conduct of a judge of the Supreme Court or High Court. They can do so only in case of impeachment.
    • Article 361: The President and Governors enjoy immunity from court proceedings.
    • The doctrine of separation of powers: it is a part of the basic structure of the Constitution, although not specifically mentioned. It calls for the division of powers of the state among three organs to avoid the overpowering of any one organ.

    Reasons for the tussle

    • Wide range of powers: The power of the Indian Supreme Court is comparable to those of its United States counterpart, including broad original and appellate jurisdiction and the right to pass on the constitutionality of laws passed by the Parliament. In the exercise of its power, however, the court has been at the center of major two controversies concerning the constitutional and political order in India.
    • Court’s FR vs State’s DPSP: The efforts by the court to give priority to the Fundamental Rights provisions in the constitution in a case where they have come into conflict with the Directive Principles, especially the broad ideological and policy goals of the Indian state and to which the executive and legislature have often given priority
    • Power of judicial review: The court’s power of judicial review of legislation passed by Parliament, which has on numerous occasions led to stalemates that point to a constitutional contradiction between the principle of Parliamentary sovereignty and that of judicial review.
    • The Collegium system: The collegium system of appointment of judges is popularly referred to as judges selecting judges. The collegium system is the Supreme Court’s invention. There is no mention of the collegium system either in the original constitution of India or successive amendments. From 1950 to 1973, the practice has been to appoint the senior most judge of the Supreme Court as Chief Justice of India. But the appointment and transfer of judges in the Supreme Court and High Courts became a matter of controversy between the judiciary and executive in 1973.
    • Collegium System vs National Judicial Appointment Commission: The judiciary withheld the NJAC as unconstitutional and void. The Supreme Court objects to the inclusion of politicians in the NJAC particularly the two eminent members of the society. These eminent persons are to be nominated for a three-year term by a Selection Committee consisting of the Chief Justice, the Prime Minister and the leader of the opposition in the Lok Sabha, and are not eligible for re-nomination. The Court blamed if politicians are involved, what about judicial independence? Those against the NJAC argue that it will give the executive undue influence over the selection of judges.
    • The decline of Parliament: Due to the failure of the executive and legislature to provide a solution to problems of the citizenry, citizens move to court for remedies. In the process of providing justice to the citizens, the judiciary sometimes crosses its boundary which leads to its tussle with the executive.

    Consequences of the tussle

    • Creates an Environment of distrust: the tussle creates an environment of distrust between the branches, leading to reduced cooperation and stagnancy in the reform process. some blame games and grandstanding are thrown in to either hide their limitations or to proclaim their superiority.
    • The struggle of power: Both sides seem to be engaged in a game of tug of war where each wants something important, which is the power of judicial appointment to the higher judiciary. But what is surprising and difficult to understand is that both executive and judiciary believe in making appointments to the higher judiciary on merit which can contribute to the accountability and efficiency of the judiciary and yet there is no consensus between the two!
    • Ignorance of separation of powers: Many of them miss the principle of separation of functions enshrined in the Constitution, a basic tenet of the Constitution for maintaining harmonious inter-institutional balance, as well as the differences in their respective ecosystems.
    • A mismatch between expectations and realization: Several laws such as contract laws, environmental laws and even corporate laws are not fully in tune with the new aspirations. Interpretations of economic laws by the judiciary remain in a static mode. Even when they come late, they are at times not in tune with the direction the executive would like it to be. So, there is disenchantment with the judiciary. While some may be genuine, many of them are the result of the mismatch between expectations and realization.

    Way forward

    • Strike a balance, especially by the executive: Inter-institutional balancing, even with strong constitutional provisions, is a difficult task. While the three wings of the State (Legislature, Executive and Judiciary) have to work for maintaining that delicate balance, it is primarily the responsibility of the executive to strive extra hard for the same. Because the executive is the most visible organ of the State as it is the government for all practical purposes.
    • Improving overall governance system: There is also a lot of disenchantment with the executive on multiple aspects of day-to-day civic life. Further, it is well-known that the executive is the largest litigant, clogging the judicial system. These are the result of suboptimal governance from the side of the executive.
    • Human resource management and ensuring sufficient financial resources and operational freedom for all agencies are all functions of the executive branch, the government.
    • Respecting the boundaries of each: To break this sub-optimal governance trap and to enhance the performance of all wings and agencies, those in responsible positions need to take a deep breath, think aloud and come out with appropriate solutions; understanding and respecting the boundaries of each of the three wings of the State. Institutional solutions on weighty issues like inter-institutional balancing and efficiency enhancement require a balanced, institutionalized approach.

    Conclusion

    • The “tussle” between the executive/legislature and the judiciary is not a real one. On the other hand, a judiciary and executive on the same page is disastrous for constitutional government and human rights.
    • The problem is inbuilt into the institution. The executive has to ensure the judiciary that they have no intention of curbing their independence. Also, the judiciary should not be too touchy that every small little thing is a challenge to their independence. The tension between them is due to this confrontation.

    Click and get your FREE Copy of CURRENT AFFAIRS Micro Notes

    (Click) FREE1-to-1 on-call Mentorship by IAS-IPS officers | Discuss doubts, strategy, sources, and more