đŸ’„Join UPSC 2027,2028 Mentorship (July Batch) + XFactor Notes & Microthemes PDF
Talk to Mentor

Civilsdaily

Login

Distribution: yearly

  • Government to tighten AI labelling rules for social media over ‘unsatisfactory compliance’

    Why in the News?

    The government’s decision to tighten AI labelling rules marks a clear step-up in digital regulation, triggered by poor compliance from platforms like YouTube, Instagram, and X. Earlier, platforms only needed to show “prominent” labels, but now they must display continuous and clearly visible labels throughout the content, making the rules much stricter. This change is important because cases of harmful AI content, such as deepfake images of women created by X’s Grok, have exposed serious gaps in regulation, raising concerns about privacy, dignity, and large-scale misinformation.

    What are the AI Content labelling rules for social media?

    1. The Government of India has notified the Information Technology (Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code) Amendment Rules, 2026 (effective February 20, 2026), making AI content labelling mandatory on social media platforms. These rules are designed to curb the spread of deepfakes, misinformation, and non-consensual sexual content (CSAM).
    2. AI content labelling on social media is the mandatory or voluntary tagging of images, videos, and audio created or altered by artificial intelligence (AI) to distinguish them from human-made content. 
    3. It aims to increase transparency, reduce misinformation (deepfakes), and comply with regulations by using visible labels (e.g., “AI-generated”) or hidden metadata.

    Key Features of the Amended IT Rules (2026):

    1. Mandatory Labelling: Social media platforms must prominently label “synthetically generated” or AI-generated images and videos that appear realistic.
    2. User Declaration: Platforms with over five million users must obtain a user declaration for AI-generated content and conduct technical verification before publishing.
    3. Excluded Content: Routine smartphone photo editing, filters, and film special effects are exempt from mandatory labelling.
    4. Permanent Metadata: Platforms must try to embed permanent metadata or watermarks to trace the origin of AI content.
    5. Takedown Timelines:
      1. 2 hours: Non-consensual deepfakes and intimate imagery must be removed within 2 hours of a complaint.
      2. 3 hours: Other illegal content must be removed within 3 hours of a court/government order.
    6. Loss of Safe Harbour: Non-compliance with these rules can result in the loss of safe harbour protection under Section 79 of the IT Act, making platforms liable for the content.

    Key Proposed AI Labeling Amendments (April 2026) and how do the proposed amendments strengthen accountability of intermediaries?

    1. Continuous On-Screen Labels: The new proposal mandates that AI labels remain continuously and clearly visible throughout the entire duration of the video or audio content, rather than just in the beginning or occasionally.
    2. Expansion of Scope: The labeling requirement applies to “synthetically generated information” (SGI), which includes text, audio, images, and videos created or altered via AI to appear authentic.
    3. Platform Accountability: Social media intermediaries must ensure these labels are present. Failure to comply could lead to a loss of “safe harbour” protection, meaning platforms could be held liable for user-generated content.
    4. User Responsibilities: Users are required to declare if content is AI-generated upon uploading, which platforms must then verify using “reasonable and proportionate technical measures“.
    5. Stricter Takedown Timelines: The proposal includes a heavily reduced takedown timeline, requiring platforms to remove illegal, non-consensual deepfakes within 2 to 3 hours of a lawful order.
    6. Feedback Deadline Extended: The deadline for public feedback on these proposed changes has been extended to May 7, 2026. 

    These moves, which follow initial rules announced in February 2026, are designed to combat the rising misuse of deepfakes and misinformation, ensuring that AI-generated material is easily distinguishable from real content

    What regulatory gap prompted stricter AI labelling norms?

    The primary regulatory gap that prompted stricter AI labelling norms was the transition from a standard of “prominent visibility” to a mandate for “continuous and clearly visible display” throughout the entire duration of the content. 

    1. Unsatisfactory compliance: Social media platforms failed to ensure consistent labelling despite February notification. For instance, only about 30% of AI-generated test posts were correctly flagged across major platforms.
    2. Inconsistent visibility: Labels appeared briefly or were not prominently displayed throughout content duration.
      1. Under earlier guidelines, AI labels often appeared only briefly or were placed in a way that was easily missed by users. The new 2026 amendments specifically aim to eliminate “blink-and-miss” disclaimers by requiring the label to remain on screen from start to finish.
    3. Regulatory dilution: Earlier proposal mandating labels to occupy 10% space was diluted, reducing effectiveness.
    4. Traceability Gaps: To prevent the removal of disclosures, the new norms mandate embedding permanent metadata or unique identifiers into synthetic content to ensure it remains traceable even when shared. 

    What is the significance of redefining Synthetic Generated Information (SGI)?

    Redefining Synthetically Generated Information (SGI) under India’s IT Rules 2026 is significant because it shifts from a reactive, general content moderation model to a proactive, AI-specific regulatory framework.

    1. Definition of SGI (Feb 2026 Rules): Refers to information created, modified, or generated using AI tools that can mimic real persons, events, or content.
      1. Includes deepfakes, AI-generated videos, audio, images, or text that appear real.
      2. Focuses on content that can mislead users or distort reality.
    2. Scope in February 2026 Rules:
      1. Broad coverage: Any AI-generated content that resembles real-world entities.
      2. Mandatory labelling: Required “prominent” disclosure, but no clarity on duration or format.
      3. Carve-outs included: Routine editing (filters, enhancement, dubbing) excluded as “good-faith use”.

    What changes in the Proposed New Rules?

    1. Stricter visibility requirement:
      1. Continuous and clearly visible labelling throughout the content duration.
      2. Removes ambiguity of “prominent” labels.
    2. Sharper focus on harm:
      1. Targets SGI that violates laws or leads to misrepresentation of identity/events.
      2. Expands regulatory intent from disclosure for the prevention of misuse.
    3. Platform accountability strengthened:
      1. Requires verification of user declarations about SGI.
      2. Mandates technical safeguards to detect and prevent harmful SGI.
    4. Enforcement mechanism: Platforms must take immediate action (remove, disable access, suspend accounts) upon detection.

    Why is this significant?

    1. Clear classification: Defines AI-generated content as SGI, ensuring regulatory clarity.
    2. Carve-outs provision: Excludes routine and good-faith editing (audio/video enhancement) from SGI definition.
    3. Misrepresentation control: Targets content that violates laws or misrepresents real-world events or identities.

    What risks associated with AI-generated content triggered regulatory urgency?

    1. Deepfake misuse: Grok-generated images of women in revealing clothing raised dignity and privacy concerns.
    2. Misinformation threat: AI content risks distorting facts and influencing public perception.
    3. Identity manipulation: Enables impersonation and false representation of individuals.
    4. Global backlash: Incident led to bans in some countries and forced platform-level corrective measures.

    How does the amendment impact Big Tech platforms?

    1. Enhanced compliance burden: Requires continuous monitoring and enforcement mechanisms.
    2. Liability exposure: Failure to act may attract legal consequences under IT Rules.
    3. User accountability integration: Platforms must ensure users disclose AI-generated content.
    4. Content moderation expansion: Strengthens obligations for proactive detection and removal.

    What are the implications for digital governance in India?

    1. Regulatory evolution: Moves from reactive to proactive AI governance.
    2. Platform responsibility shift: Transfers greater accountability to intermediaries.
    3. Rights protection: Strengthens safeguards for privacy, dignity, and authenticity.
    4. Policy alignment: Aligns with global concerns on AI ethics and misinformation control.

    Conclusion

    The proposed amendments signal a decisive shift towards stricter AI governance, emphasizing transparency and accountability. Effective implementation will determine whether India can balance innovation with safeguards against misinformation and digital harm.

    PYQ Relevance

    [UPSC 2024] Social media and encrypting messaging services pose a serious security challenge. What measures have been adopted at various levels to address the security implications of social media? Also suggest any other remedies to address the problem.

    Linkage: AI labelling rules and SGI regulation fall under GS-3 (Cyber Security, Emerging Technologies), focusing on risks like deepfakes, misinformation, and platform accountability. They also link to GS-2 (Governance) through regulation of intermediaries and GS-4 (Ethics) via concerns of privacy, dignity, and responsible AI use.

  • Delimitation & Women’s Reservation 

    Why in the News?

    • The Centre has proposed inter-State redistribution of Lok Sabha seats based on the 2011 Census, along with implementing 33% women’s reservation.

    Key Proposals

    1. Fresh Delimitation

    • Based on latest published Census (likely 2011)
    • Ends earlier freeze based on 1971 Census
    • Mandates readjustment of seats among States

    2. Increase in Lok Sabha Strength

    • Current: 543 seats
    • Proposed:
      • Up to 850 seats
      • Around 815 for States
      • 35 for Union Territories

    3. Women’s Reservation

    • 33% reservation in Lok Sabha & State Assemblies
    • Linked to:
      • Delimitation
      • Census-based seat allocation

    Major Impact  

    Shift in Representation

    • Hindi heartland States
      • Share increases: 38.1% → 43.1%
    • Southern States
      • Share decreases: 24.3% → 20.7%

    Examples of Seat Changes

    • Uttar Pradesh: +58 seats (80 → ~138)
    • Bihar: 40 → 72
    • Maharashtra: 48 → 78
    • Tamil Nadu: 39 → 50  
    • Kerala: 20 → 23  

    Constitutional Background

    Current System

    • Seat allocation based on:
      • 1971 Census (inter-State)
      • 2001 Census (intra-State)

    Relevant Articles

    • Article 81 — Composition of Lok Sabha
    • Article 82 — Readjustment after Census

    Freeze

    • Delimitation frozen till 2026
    • Reason: Promote population control policies
    [2024] Consider the following statements regarding ‘Nari Shakti Vandan Adhiniyam’: 
    1 Provisions will come into effect from the 18th Lok Sabha. 
    2 This will be in force for 15 years after becoming an Act. 
    3 There are provisions for the reservation of seats for Scheduled Castes Women within the quota reserved for the Scheduled Castes. 
    Which of the statements given above are correct? 
    (a) 1, 2 and 3 (b) 1 and 2 only (c) 2 and 3 only (d) 1 and 3 only

  • Pyrite

    Why in the News?

    Scientists have discovered the oldest known evidence of fire making by prehistoric humans in England. The findings include heated clay, heat shattered flint handaxes and pieces of iron pyrite, which can generate sparks when struck against flint.

    About Pyrite

    • Pyrite is a brass yellow mineral with a bright metallic lustre.
       ‱ Chemical composition: Iron sulfide (FeS₂).
       ‱ It is the most common sulfide mineral found on Earth.
       ‱ The name is derived from the Greek word pyr meaning fire, as pyrite emits sparks when struck by metal or flint.
       ‱ Nodules of pyrite found in prehistoric burial mounds suggest its early use in fire making.
       ‱ Commonly known as “Fool’s Gold” due to its superficial resemblance to gold.

    Distinguishing Pyrite from Gold

    • Pyrite is much lighter than gold.
       ‱ It is harder than gold and cannot be scratched with a fingernail or a pocket knife.
       ‱ Gold is soft, malleable and can be easily scratched.

    Occurrence

    • Found worldwide in diverse geological settings.
       ‱ Occurs in sedimentary deposits, hydrothermal veins and as a constituent of metamorphic rocks.

    Uses of Pyrite

    • Source of iron and sulfur.
       ‱ Used in the manufacture of sulfuric acid.
       ‱ Used to produce iron sulfate.
       ‱ Iron sulfate applications include nutritional supplements, ink, lawn conditioner, water treatment and flocculation, and moss control.
       ‱ Iron sulfate derived from pyrite is used in the treatment of iron deficiency anemia.
       ‱ Some varieties contain microscopic gold and can be mined as a gold ore.

    Prelims Pointer

    • Pyrite’s ability to produce sparks made it an important material for early human fire technology.
    Ilmenite and rutile, abundantly available in certain coastal tracts of India, are rich sources of which one of the following? (2023)

    (a) Aluminium 

    (b) Copper 

    (c) Iron 

    (d) Titanium

  • [24th November 2025] The Hindu OpED: The future of health lies in harmony

    PYQ Relevance

    [UPSC 2019] How is the Government of India protecting traditional knowledge of medicine from patenting by pharmaceutical companies?

    Linkage: Traditional medicine is gaining global traction, so protecting it from patenting and biopiracy is now a core policy priority rather than a cultural concern. As India leads the global traditional medicine agenda, this linkage makes the topic very likely to appear in future UPSC exams under health governance, IPR and soft-power.

    Mentor’s Comment

    The global health landscape is undergoing a paradigm shift. Traditional medicine, once seen as alternative, is now being recognised as a scientific and social asset. With India emerging as a hub of innovation and evidence-based traditional research, and hosting the Second WHO Global Summit on Traditional Medicine, the world is witnessing a renewed focus on health systems rooted in balance, sustainability and technology-enabled well-being.

    INTRODUCTION

    Health, in its original meaning, has always signified harmony, within the human body, and between humans and nature. With modern lifestyles driving chronic diseases, mental strain and ecological imbalance, traditional systems of medicine offer a rediscovered pathway to well-being that integrates mind, body, community, and environment. India, with its rich heritage of Ayurveda, Yoga, Unani, Siddha and Sowa-Rigpa, is repositioning traditional medicine as an engine of science-driven global healthcare transformation.

    WHY IN THE NEWS?

    The Second WHO Global Summit on Traditional Medicine hosted by India marks a watershed moment, for the first time, traditional medicine is being institutionalised globally as a scientific, evidence-backed and sustainable component of public health systems. With around 90% of WHO member-states reporting usage of traditional medicine, and India’s AYUSH market reaching USD 34.3 billion, global health priorities are shifting from reactive sick-care to proactive well-being. The Summit signals the beginning of a new chapter where traditional medicine integrates with modern technologies, data analytics and global governance.

    Why is traditional medicine gaining global significance?

    1. Escalating lifestyle diseases: rising non-communicable diseases demand preventive, holistic models of care.
    2. Fragmented systems failing: reactive, curative-centric models cannot ensure long-term public well-being.
    3. Biodiversity-nutrition-livelihood interlinkages: traditional medicine influences food security, sustainability and livelihoods.
    4. Affordability for LMICs: for billions across low- and middle-income regions, traditional medicine remains first access to healthcare.

    How is traditional medicine evolving from belief to science?

    1. Evidence-based research: WHO emphasises integration supported by data, learning and scientific validation.
    2. Shift from consumer preference to collective responsibility: well-being linked to shared ecosystems and sustainability.
    3. Recognition as a scientific and social asset: elevated at the 2023 WHO Summit in Gandhinagar.
    4. Institutional reforms in India: dedicated AYUSH department at BIS, and global standards under ISO/TC 249/SC 2.

    What is India’s leadership role in global traditional medicine?

    1. WHO Global Traditional Medicine Centre (GTMC) in Jamnagar: a knowledge hub for innovation, analytics and sustainability.
    2. Memorandum of Understanding with WHO: India co-hosts global Summit and participates in shaping global priorities.
    3. Political and scientific commitment: Prime Minister’s focus leads to increasing investments and ecosystem building.
    4. Vision of collective global stewardship: India positions traditional knowledge as shared global heritage.

    How does technology change future pathways of traditional medicine?

    1. Digital health and analytics: enable real-time monitoring, transparency and measurable clinical outcomes.
    2. Sustainability and biodiversity research: bridges traditional practice with ecological protection.
    3. Innovation-led scaling: makes traditional systems compatible with global regulatory and safety frameworks.
    4. Data-driven inclusion: ensures equitable access to health knowledge and solutions.

    How does the Summit reshape global health governance?

    1. Benefit sharing and fair access: ensures equitable utilisation of biological and cultural assets.
    2. Value of local heritage in globalisation: respects indigenous knowledge in global supply chains.
    3. Integration with modern health priorities: aligns traditional medicine with contemporary clinical and public health goals.
    4. Ethical anchoring of future innovation: technology with community-rooted ethics and sustainability.

    CONCLUSION

    The world is moving toward a health model where prevention, sustainability, community participation and science converge. Traditional medicine, empowered by research, technology and equitable access, offers a pathway to resilience against lifestyle diseases and global health inequalities. India’s leadership in steering this transformation reinforces health not as the absence of disease, but as a state of balance between humans and nature.

  • Labour codes: what changes for workers and employers

    Introduction

    The four labour codes, Code on Wages, Code on Social Security, Industrial Relations Code, and Occupational Safety, Health and Working Conditions Code, aim to simplify compliance for industries, expand social security to workers, and improve ease of doing business. However, labour being a concurrent subject, implementation depends on states, and concerns have emerged about job security, worker rights, and the impact on collective bargaining.

    Why in the News

    The government has notified the implementation of four labour codes after over five years of deliberation and the consolidation of 29 central labour laws. This marks the first time India will operate under a uniform nationwide wage system and a consolidated social security architecture. While the reforms promise simplified compliance and a push for manufacturing efficiency, trade unions warn of reduced strike power, easier employee termination, and increased precarity for informal workers, making it one of the most debated labour reforms in recent times.

    Labour Codes and the Changing Labour Landscape

    1. Consolidation of 29 laws into four codes to create uniformity and remove overlapping provisions.
    2. Target shift from penal to compliance-based enforcement, especially for small firms and first-time offences.
    3. Push for economies of scale in manufacturing, signalling alignment with global production norms.

    Code on Wages: What changes for employees and employers?

    1. Uniform definition of wages: It ensures consistency in minimum wage calculation across states and sectors.
    2. Mandated national floor wage: It enables states to set minimum wages only above the national baseline.
    3. Time-bound wage payment: within 2 days of resignation/termination and 7 days of completion of the wage period.
    4. Broader coverage for all employees irrespective of industry or wage threshold.
    5. Overtime provisions strengthened: capped at 48 hours weekly, 12 hours daily shift duration permitted with breaks.

    Code on Social Security: Is the social net expanding?

    1. Unified ecosystem of social security: It covers unorganised, informal, gig, and platform workers for the first time.
    2. National Social Security Board: For recommendations, registration, schemes, and funding decisions.
    3. Corporate Co-contribution: Corporates may co-contribute to gig/platform worker benefits but funding split still unclear.
    4. ESIC expansion: Applies to sectors previously exempt; plantation workers included voluntarily.
    5. Formalisation incentive through maternity benefits, gratuity reforms, and inclusion of fixed-term employees.

    Industrial Relations Code: Does it limit collective bargaining?

    1. Stricter strike rules: 60-day notice before strike and prohibition of strike in the next 14 days of conciliation.
    2. Increase in threshold: Threshold for prior permission for layoffs raised from 100 to 300 workers, enabling easier hiring-firing.
    3. Negotiating Union provision: Only unions with 51% membership can negotiate; multi-union negotiation councils for fragmented memberships.
    4. Push for stable industrial climate: It is criticised for shrinking bargaining space for workers.

    OSH Code: Will workplace safety improve?

    1. Standardised norms: Across industries norms for working hours, workplace safety, and facility obligations.
    2. Mandatory free annual health check-ups: For workers in notified industries.
    3. Women allowed in all sectors and night shifts: subject to safety conditions.
    4. Increased accountability for establishments: In case of handling hazardous activities and migrant labour.

    Conclusion

    The labour codes aim to simplify compliance and strengthen India’s labour market to support manufacturing-led growth. However, concerns persist regarding job security, collective bargaining, and implementation across states. Successful outcomes depend on balancing economic flexibility with worker protection and ensuring that reforms lead to formalisation without vulnerability.

    PYQ Relevance

    [UPSC 2024] Discuss the merits and demerits of the four ‘Labour Codes’ in the context of labour market reforms in India. What has been the progress so far in this regard?

    Linkage: Growth driven mainly by labour productivity has led to GDP rising without proportional job creation. This links to the four Labour Codes, which seek higher productivity and flexibility, but face concerns on whether they will create jobs while protecting workers.

  • How can State PSCs be reformed

    Introduction

    Public Service Commissions are constitutional institutions meant to ensure merit-based appointments insulated from political pressures. A century after the Montagu–Chelmsford report envisaged them, State PSCs face credibility challenges due to recruitment irregularities and systemic inefficiencies that affect millions of aspirants.

    Why in the news?

    At the 2025 National Conference of Chairpersons of State Public Service Commissions hosted by Telangana PSC, members acknowledged recruitment controversies and demanded urgent reforms. Aspirant protests in Hyderabad highlighted how even minor delays disrupt youth livelihood prospects. Persistent exam cancellations and unclear syllabi have deepened mistrust despite PSCs’ constitutional mandate of meritocracy.

    Historical evolution of State PSCs :

    1. Montagu-Chelmsford Report :
      1. Recommended statutory recruitment bodies for welfare-oriented administration.
      2. Laid conceptual foundation for PSCs in India.
    2. First Public Service Commission (1926) :
      1. Set up for the Government of India before Independence.
      2. Marked beginning of institutionalised merit-based recruitment.
    3. Constitutionalisation through Article 315:
      1. Provided for separate Public Service Commissions for Union and States.
      2. Ensured autonomy and continuity post-Independence.

    Constitutional structure and organisation :

    1. Appointment and tenure of members: Governor appoints chairperson and members with fixed tenure and protected service conditions.
    2. Constitutional independence: PSCs function autonomously and discharge duties without executive interference.
    3. Role of UPSC in relation to State PSCs: UPSC may advise State PSCs on service matters when requested.
    4. Role of Ministry of Personnel: Helps maintain coherence in administrative policies across States.

    Present functioning and examination framework :

    1. Syllabus review mechanism: Periodic syllabus updates mandated to align with evolving administrative requirements.
    2. Question paper setting and evaluation: PSC sets papers, evaluates answer scripts and prepares selection lists.
    3. Cut-offs and result publication: Merit lists released after evaluation; criteria finalised by the PSC.

    Current challenges and bottlenecks

    1. Irregular recruitment cycles: Long gaps between notification and appointments disrupt careers and spark protests.
    2. Lack of transparency: Limited disclosure on answer keys and evaluation has lowered institutional credibility.
    3. Paper leaks and cancellations: Allegations of malpractice lead to cancellation, delays and erosion of public trust.
    4. Outdated syllabus issues: Poor syllabus revisions fail to reflect new governance themes and legal developments.
    5. Inconsistent standards across States: Divergent evaluation standards hinder mobility and generate inequality.

    Proposed reforms and restructuring measures:

    1. Revised manpower planning: Systematic vacancy forecasting to prevent examination delays.
    2. Fixed examination calendar: Annual, predictable and uniform recruitment schedule across States.
    3. Transparent evaluation policy: Mandatory disclosure of answer keys, normalisation criteria and cut-off logic.
    4. Academic and administrative alignment: Regular syllabus revision to match governance and administrative reality.
    5. Professional expertise induction: Inclusion of subject experts to improve paper quality and evaluation fairness.

    Conclusion

    State PSCs were created to provide equal opportunity in public employment. However, recruitment delays, unclear syllabi and opacity have damaged public trust. Ensuring predictability, transparency and institutional professionalism is essential to protect youth aspirations and restore confidence in constitutional recruitment bodies.

    PYQ Relevance

    [UPSC 2024] What are the aims and objects of the recently passed and enforced Public Examination (Prevention of Unfair Means) Act, 2024? Whether University/State Education Board examinations too are covered under the Act?

    Linkage: The Act directly links to the PSC crisis by targeting leaks, exam fraud and loss of trust in public recruitment. It sets a future-ready template for PSC reforms through transparency, deterrence and integrity in examinations.

  • Centre notifies four new Labour Codes

    Why In The News?

    The Centre notified all four Labour Codes, introducing major reforms and replacing 29 outdated labour laws dating back to the 1930s.

    1)Introduction to the Labour Codes Notification:

    • Major Reform Announcement: The Centre notified all four Labour Codes, introducing wide-ranging changes in India’s labour framework.
    • Key Focus Areas: The reforms expand social security to gig workers, ensure gender pay parity, enhance women’s workplace rights, and introduce fixed-term employment.
    • Replacement of Old Laws: The Codes replace 29 fragmented labour laws dating back to the 1930s–1950s.

    2)Government’s Stance:

    • Prime Minister’s View: PM Modi described the reforms as one of the most comprehensive labour transformations since Independence.
    • Worker Empowerment: The government highlights that the Codes aim to ensure universal social security, timely wage payments, and safer workplaces.
    • Simplified Compliance: The reforms are expected to promote ease of doing business through simplified compliance mechanisms.
    • Minister’s Statement: Labour Minister Mansukh Mandaviya said the Codes will formalise employment and make the labour ecosystem globally aligned.
    • State-Level Readiness: Most States have already issued draft rules; the Centre is supporting those still finalising rules.

    3)Key Provisions:

    • Women’s Safety and Rights: Expanded rights, including permission for night shifts and enhanced workplace safety.
    • Health and Social Security: Free annual health check-ups for workers above 40 and nationwide ESIC coverage, including hazardous units.
    • Simplified Procedures: A single registration, licensing, and return system for employers.
    • Wage and Safety Standards: Introduction of a national floor wage and creation of a National OSH Board for uniform safety standards.
    • Fixed-Term Employment: Allows fixed-term workers to receive all benefits equivalent to permanent workers.
    • New Work Categories: Gig workers, platform workers, and aggregators are legally defined for the first time.
    • Universal Account Number: Aadhaar-linked UAN ensures portability and easy access to welfare benefits.
    • Inclusion of Plantation Workers: Plantation workers brought under OSHWC and Social Security Codes.

    4)Responses from Stakeholders:

    Trade Union Concerns:

    • Opposition to Codes: Several central trade unions reject the Labour Codes, labelling them anti-worker and pro-employer.
    • Issues with Timing: CTUs argue implementing the Codes amid rising unemployment and inflation will worsen workers’ hardships.
    • Protest Plans: Unions have announced nationwide protests on November 26 and cite earlier strikes against the Codes.
    • Fear of Exploitation: Trade unions warn the reforms could revive a “master-servant” relationship, reducing worker protections.

    BMS Standpoint: The Bharatiya Mazdoor Sangh supports implementation but seeks amendments to remove perceived anti-worker provisions in OSH and Industrial Relations Codes.

    Industry View: CII praises the reforms as a transformative step towards a modern and simplified labour ecosystem.

    [UPSC 2021] With reference to casual workers employed in India, consider the following statements: 1.All casual workers are entitled to Employees Provident Fund coverage.

    2.All casual workers are entitled to regular working hours and overtime payment.

    3.The government can, by notification, specify that an establishment or industry shall pay wages only through its bank account. Which of the above statements are correct? Options: (a) 1 and 2 only (b) 2 and 3 only* (c) 1 and 3 only (d) 1, 2, and 3

     

  • Pradhan Mantri Fasal Bima Yojana: Rajasthan farmers’ protests on insurance claims

    Why In The News?

    Farmers in Rajasthan’s Churu district held a ‘Kisan Ekta Tractor March’ demanding pending crop insurance claims, fertiliser availability, transparency in the insurance portal, and inclusion of certain crops in PM Dhan Dhanya Yojana. The protest was postponed after government assurances during late-night negotiations.

    About Pradhan Mantri Fasal Bima Yojana (PMFBY):

    • Launch & Purpose:
      • Launched on 18 February 2016 by the Ministry of Agriculture to provide affordable crop insurance and financial protection against losses from natural calamities, pests, and diseases.
      • Implemented through insurance companies and banks.
    • Objectives:
      • Provide financial assistance for crop loss due to unforeseen events.
      • Stabilise farmer income and ensure continuity in farming.
      • Promote modern agricultural practices.
      • Encourage crop diversification, enhance creditworthiness, and improve agriculture sector competitiveness.
    • Eligibility:
      • All farmers including sharecroppers and tenant farmers growing notified crops in notified areas.
      • Compulsory: Loanee farmers with Seasonal Agricultural Operations (SAO) loans.
      • Voluntary: Non-loanee farmers.
      • Must have insurable interest and valid land ownership/tenure documents.
      • Must not receive duplicate compensation from other sources.
      • Special focus on SC/ST/Women farmers with proportional budget allocation.
    • Benefits:
      • Affordable Premiums:
        • Farmers pay 2% for Kharif, 1.5% for Rabi, and 5% for commercial/horticultural crops.
        • Government provides premium subsidy; pays full premium in NE states, J&K, and Himachal Pradesh.
      • Comprehensive Coverage:
        • Covers natural disasters, pests, diseases, and post-harvest losses (hailstorm, landslide).
        • Excludes losses due to war, nuclear risks, malicious damage, or preventable risks.
      • Timely Compensation:
        • Claims processed within two months of harvest.
      • Technology-Driven Implementation:
        • Uses satellite imaging, drones, and mobile apps for precise loss estimation.
        • NCIP for digital processing; YES-TECH for remote-sensing yield estimation; CROPIC for geotagged crop verification.
    [UPSC 2020] In India, which of the following can be considered as public investment in agriculture?
    1. Fixing Minimum Support Price for agricultural produce of all crops
    2. Computerization of Primary Agricultural Credit Societies
    3. Social Capital development
    4. Free electricity supply to farmers
    5. Waiver of agricultural loans by the banking system
    6. Setting up of cold storage facilities by the governments
    Select the correct answer using the code given below: Options: (a) 1, 2 and 5 only (b) 1, 3, 4 and 5 only (c) 2, 3 and 6 only* (d) 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6

     

  • Government plans unification of port security regulations- sovereign entity to oversee private ports while CISF will regulate 80 ports

    Why In The News?

    The government has designated CISF as the security regulator for 250+ seaports to strengthen coastal security.

    1) New Security Framework:

    • Sovereign Entity at Seaports: Government to deploy CISF as a sovereign security force at private cargo-handling ports for a uniform security system.
    • Initial Coverage: CISF to regulate 80 major export-import seaports for access control, cargo screening, and seafront patrolling.
    • Phase-wise Expansion: Remaining 170 seaports will be brought under CISF in stages.
    • ISPS Code Role: CISF designated as the Recognised Security Organisation under the International Ship and Port Facility Security Code.

    2)Framework for Seaport Security in India:

    • International Ship and Port Facility Security (ISPS) Code:
      India’s port security system aligns with the mandatory global ISPS Code, introduced after 9/11 to protect ships and port facilities from terrorism and other maritime threats.
    • Central Industrial Security Force (CISF) as Security Regulator:
      The Government of India has recently designated the CISF as the Recognised Security Organisation (RSO) for ports, marking a major reform to strengthen and standardise port security across the country.

    3)Challenges to Port Security:

    • Non-Standardised Security Framework:
      • Security at many non-major ports historically lacked uniformity and expert oversight.
      • Heavy dependence on private security agencies or local police resulted in inconsistent standards.
    • Transnational & Non-Traditional Threats:
      • Maritime terrorism remains a persistent risk.
      • Smuggling and drug trafficking, with ports often used for large narcotics consignments.
      • Cyberattacks targeting port IT systems and critical infrastructure.
    • Infrastructure & Manpower Gaps:
      • Difficulty in ensuring uniform, high-quality security infrastructure across 250+ ports.
      • Significant manpower shortages: CISF requires 800-1,000 personnel per major seaport and has requested 10,000 additional personnel for initial deployment.
    • Coastal Vulnerabilities:
      • Large stretches of coastline remain open, poorly monitored, or unguarded.
      • Absence of a sovereign security force at private ports has created long-standing security gaps.
    • Identified Gaps in Official Reviews:
      • Coastal security flagged as a priority for discussion at the Director Generals of Police (DGP) Conference, attended by the Prime Minister.
      • The 2023 MHA guidelines highlighted major deficiencies and recommended comprehensive improvements.

    4) Committee Recommendations:

    • Committee Findings: A 2024 Joint Committee (CISF + Director General Shipping) conducted gap analysis and proposed corrective measures.
    • Hybrid Security Model: Core security functions to be handled by CISF, while State Police/private agencies manage non-core duties.

    5)About CISF:

    • Overview: CISF is a Central Armed Police Force under the Ministry of Home Affairs, headquartered in New Delhi; motto: “Protection and Security.”
    • Establishment:
      • Formed in 1969 through the CISF Act, 1968 with three battalions.
      • Declared an Armed Force of the Union after the 1983 amendment.
      • Expanded into a multi-skilled force with 188,000+ personnel.
      • Provides security to 359 establishments nationwide.
    • Organisation Structure:
      • Headed by a Director-General (IPS), assisted by an Additional DG.
      • Divided into seven sectors: Airport, North, North-East, East, West, South, Training.
      • Has a dedicated Fire Service Wing.
    • Functions:
      • Secures critical infrastructure: nuclear and space facilities, airports, seaports, power plants.
      • Protects Delhi Metro, Parliament Complex, heritage monuments, and major government buildings.
      • Responsible for airport security since 2000 (post IC-814 hijacking).
      • Provides VIP security to designated protectees.
      • Trained in disaster management (floods, earthquakes, cyclones).
      • Operates India’s largest Fire Protection Service among CAPFs.
      • Post-2008 Mumbai attacks, expanded to private sector security.
      • Functions as a compensatory cost force, billing clients for services.
    [UPSC 2023] With reference to Home Guards, consider the following statements:

    1. Home Guards are raised under the Home Guards Act and Rules of the Central Government.

    2. The role of the Home Guards is to serve as an auxiliary force to the police in maintenance of internal security.

    3. To prevent infiltration on the international border/coastal areas, the Border Wing Home Guards Battalions have been raised in some States.

    How many of the above statements are correct?

    Options: (a) Only one (b) Only two* (c) All three (d) None

     

  • IAF’s Tejas jet crashes during demo flight at Dubai Air Show, pilot killed

    Why In The News?

    An Indian Air Force Tejas fighter jet crashed during the Dubai Air Show, killing Wing Commander Namansh Syal, after spiralling out of control and igniting on impact at Al Maktoum International Airport.

    1)Tejas Mk1A: 

    • About: The Tejas Mk1A is an upgraded variant of India’s Light Combat Aircraft (LCA) Tejas, developed by Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL).
    • Purpose: This version is aimed to enhance operational and combat capabilities, survivability and maintainability over the baseline Mk1.
    • Capabilities:
      • Active Electronically Scanned Array (AESA) radar integration.
      • Electronic Warfare Suite (EWS) – radar‑warning and self‑protection jamming.
      • Upgraded Flight Control Computer (DFCC Mk1A) for better maneuverability and stability.
      • Missile compatibility- Beyond Visual Range (BVR) missiles, Air-to-Air and Air-to-Ground missiles and Advanced Short Range Air-to-Air Missiles (ASRAAM).
      • Planned integration of Combined Interrogator and Transponder (CIT), Software Defined Radio (SDR) and Operating Data Link (ODL) with existing onboard avionics.

    2) LCA Tejas:

    • About: The LCA Tejas programme, initiated by the Government of India in 1984, aimed to replace the ageing MiG-21 fighter jets. The programme is managed by the Aeronautical Development Agency (ADA).
    • Features:
      • Lightest, smallest, and tailless multi-role supersonic fighter in its class.
      • Capable of carrying a variety of air-to-air, air-to-surface, and precision-guided weapons.
      • Maximum payload capacity of 4000 kg.
      • Maximum speed: Mach 1.8.
      • Range: 3,000 km.
    • Variants of Tejas:
      • Tejas Trainer: 2-seater operational conversion trainer for training air force pilots.
      • LCA Navy: Twin- and single-seat carrier-capable for the Indian Navy.
      • LCA Tejas Navy MK2: This is phase 2 of the LCA Navy variant.
      • LCA Tejas Mk-1A: This is an improvement over the LCA Tejas Mk1 with a higher thrust engine.

    3)Fifth Generation Fighter Jets:

    • About:
      • Combat Role: Designed for highly contested combat zones with advanced air and ground threats.
      • Stealth & Speed: Feature stealth technology and supercruise capability.
      • Key Advantages:
        • Multi-spectral low-observable design
        • Enhanced self-protection
        • Radar jamming capabilities
        • Fully integrated avionics systems
      • Global Operators:
        • Russia: Sukhoi Su-57
        • China: Chengdu J-20
        • United States: F-35 series
    • Need for India:
      • Squadron Strength: IAF has ~30 squadrons, below the sanctioned 42.
      • Ageing Fleet:
        • MiG-21
        • MiG-29
        • Jaguar
        • Mirage 2000
        • All to be phased out by mid-next decade.
      • Airpower Gap:
        • China: 3,304 aircraft
        • India: 2,296 aircraft
        • Pakistan: 1,434 aircraft
      • Strategic Need: Strengthen air defences against China and Pakistan and increase defence self-reliance.
      • Indigenous Development:
        • Developing AMCA
        • Five prototypes planned
        • Joint effort by ADA, HAL, and private industry
      • Strategic Positioning: 5G fighters would place India alongside the US, Russia, and China.
    [UPSC 2024] Question: Consider the following aircraft:

    1. Rafael

    2. MiG-29

    3. Tejas MK-1

    How many of the above are considered fifth generation fighter aircraft?

    Options: (a) Only one (b) Only two (c) All three (d) None*