💥Join UPSC 2027,2028 Mentorship (July Batch) + XFactor Notes & Microthemes PDF
Talk to Mentor

Civilsdaily

Login

GS Paper: GS3-12.Effects of liberalization on the economy, changes in industrial policy and their effects on industrial growth

  • PLI Scheme for White Goods

    Why in the News?

    The Centre has announced reopening of the application window for the Production-Linked Incentive (PLI) Scheme for White Goods, following the strong response and success of earlier rounds.

    Note: White goods refer to large household appliances like refrigerators, washing machines, and air conditioners, so named because they were traditionally white.

    About the PLI Scheme for White Goods:

    • Objective: To create a complete component ecosystem for ACs and LED lights, integrating India into global supply chains and boosting domestic manufacturing.
    • Approval: Cleared by the Union Cabinet in April 2021; implemented by the Department for Promotion of Industry and Internal Trade (DPIIT).
    • Duration: Implemented over seven years (FY 2021–22 to FY 2028–29) with a total outlay of ₹6,238 crore.
    • Incentives: Provides 4–6% incentive on incremental turnover (over base year 2019–20) for both domestic sales and exports, applicable for five years to eligible companies.
    • Eligibility:
      • Applicant must be a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 2013.
      • Eligibility depends on achieving threshold levels of incremental sales and investments.
      • Entities availing benefits under any other PLI scheme for the same products are not eligible.
    • Beneficiaries So Far: 83 companies with committed investment of ₹10,406 crore have been approved under the scheme, covering AC and LED components across the entire value chain.
    • Employment and Exports: Expected to create jobs, expand exports, and enhance self-reliance in components that were earlier imported.
    [UPSC 2023] Consider the following statements:

    Statement I: India accounts for 3.2% of global exports of goods.
    Statement II: Many local companies and some foreign companies operating in India have taken advantage of India’s ‘Production-linked Incentive’ scheme.
    Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?
    (a) Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct and Statement-II is the correct explanation for Statement-I
    (b) Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct and Statement-II is not the correct explanation for Statement-I
    (c) Statement-I is correct but Statement-II is incorrect
    (d) Statement-I is incorrect but Statement-II is correct *

     

  • [10th September 2025] The Hindu Op-ed: The long march ahead to technological independence

    PYQ Relevance

    [UPSC 2023] What is the status of digitalization in the Indian economy? Examine the problems faced in this regard and suggest improvement.

    Linkage: The article highlights that while India has rapidly digitalised its economy, dependence on foreign software, cloud, and hardware exposes vulnerabilities. This reflects the structural problems of inadequate indigenous technology and lack of sovereignty. Achieving technological independence through open-source and hardware self-reliance is a crucial improvement pathway.

    Mentor’s Comment

    On India’s 79th Independence Day, Professor P.J. Narayanan reminds us that freedom today is no longer defined by political borders alone, but by technological sovereignty. As cyber wars, AI dependency, and cloud vulnerabilities reshape geopolitics, India must undertake its own “long march” towards self-reliance in both software and hardware. This article critically explores the risks of dependence, the promise of open source, and the urgent need for collective will to achieve true independence.

    Introduction

    India’s hard-won political freedom was achieved through decades of struggle, but in the 21st century, sovereignty extends beyond flags and constitutions. Technology is now the true battlefield, with wars fought in cyberspace, economies run by software, and critical infrastructure dependent on a handful of global corporations. This dependence poses a strategic vulnerability. The call for technological independence, therefore, is not just a matter of pride but of survival and security.

    The renewed urgency of technological sovereignty

    India’s 79th Independence Day has highlighted a pressing reality: while politically independent, the nation remains technologically dependent on foreign companies that control critical digital infrastructure. With modern conflicts increasingly fought through cyberspace, and with real incidents of cloud service disruptions causing harm, the vulnerability is no longer hypothetical. For the first time, technology dependence is being discussed in terms of national sovereignty, marking a paradigm shift from past concerns that were limited to strategic sectors.

    The Geopolitical Risks of Technology Dependence

    1. Cyber wars: Modern conflicts are less about bombs and more about software, drones, and cyberattacks.
    2. Critical infrastructure: Banks, trains, and power grids are run on ICT largely controlled by a few foreign firms.
    3. National diktat risks: If cloud/AI services are switched off under pressure from foreign governments, India’s economy and security could face paralysis.
    4. Real precedent: A recent stoppage of cloud services to a company proved this is not a theoretical danger.

    Defining technological sovereignty in the Indian context

    1. Lack of foundational software: India has no indigenous operating system, database, or foundational software it can fully trust.
    2. Open-source pathway: Linux, Android, and Hadoop show that community-driven, transparent solutions are possible.
    3. Challenge of sustainability: Success requires long-term support, continuous updates, and a large user base.
    4. Role of IT professionals: India’s tech community must unite to develop, maintain, and secure indigenous systems.

    Hardware sovereignty as the bigger challenge

    1. Semiconductor fabs: Require massive, long-term investments and expertise in design, manufacturing, and supply chains.
    2. Strategic prioritisation: India should start with specific hardware components, chip design, and assembly even if fabrication remains outsourced.
    3. Global lessons: Countries like Taiwan and South Korea built expertise over decades through patient national strategies.

    Open-source solutions for technological independence

    1. Gift of society: Open-source is not about opposition, but about self-support and resilience.
    2. Current limitations: Even though Android, Linux, and Hadoop are open-source, control lies with centralised cloud companies.
    3. Social movement: Just as India’s freedom was driven by collective will, a people-led movement for open-source adoption is needed.
    4. Business viability: The model must go beyond government/private funds and become self-sustaining, with people explicitly paying for trusted software.

    Immediate steps towards technological sovereignty

    1. Assemble crack teams: Develop client-side tools (database, email, calendar) and server-side tools (cloud, web, email).
    2. Product model: Teams must function like professional product-development units, not academic research groups.
    3. Mission approach: A dedicated national mission should be set up for implementation, backed by strong engineers and project managers.
    4. Enabling role of government: Focus on building a self-sustaining ecosystem with business incentives and regulatory support.

    Conclusion

    The 20th century saw India march towards political freedom; the 21st century demands a march towards technological freedom. Dependence on foreign systems is a strategic vulnerability that could cripple the nation in times of crisis. With its talent pool, thriving IT ecosystem, and democratic will, India has both the capacity and urgency to achieve technological sovereignty. The call of the hour is collective resolve, sustained investment, and a mission-driven approach.

  • Jan Vishwas Bill 2.0

    Why in the News?

    • The Jan Vishwas (Amendment of Provisions) Bill, 2025 was introduced in the Lok Sabha to further the government’s agenda of decriminalisation and rationalisation of laws.
    • This is the second Jan Vishwas Bill; the first (2023) decriminalised 183 provisions in 42 Acts.

    About the Jan Vishwas Bill 2.0:

    • Introduced in Lok Sabha (August 2025) as the second Jan Vishwas reform.
    • Seeks to amend 16 Central Acts across 10 ministries/departments.
    • Builds on the Jan Vishwas Act, 2023, which decriminalised 183 provisions in 42 Acts.
    • Aims to promote trust-based governance, ease of living, and ease of doing business.
    • Currently referred to a Lok Sabha Select Committee for examination.

    Key Features of the Bill:

    • Scope: Proposes amendments to 355 provisions:
      • 288 decriminalised (technical/procedural defaults).
      • 67 rationalised (ease of living).
    • Acts covered: RBI Act (1934), Drugs & Cosmetics Act (1940), Motor Vehicles Act (1988), Electricity Act (2003), Legal Metrology Act (2009), MSME Development Act (2006), Apprentice Act (1961), and others.
    • First-time Offences: Introduces “warning” and “improvement notice” in 76 offences (e.g., non-standard weights, MVA violations).
    • Decriminalisation: Removes imprisonment clauses for minor defaults, replacing them with fines or warnings.
      • Example: Electricity Act → imprisonment replaced with fines between ₹10,000 and ₹10 lakh.
    • Penalty Rationalisation: Automatic 10% increase in penalties every 3 years for repeat offences.
    • Objective: Ensure deterrence without overburdening courts and without repeated legislative amendments.

    Why was the Bill brought in?

    • Over-criminalisation in Indian laws:
      • 882 central laws; 370 contain criminal provisions for 7,305 offences (Vidhi Centre).
      • Many are trivial or outdated (e.g., penalties for routine acts like exercising pets incorrectly).
    • Business barriers:
      • ORF (2022) → Over 50% of 1,536 business laws carry jail terms; 37.8% of 69,233 compliances carry imprisonment clauses.
      • Creates fear among entrepreneurs, stifling growth.
    • Judicial pendency:
      • 3.6 crore criminal cases pending in district courts (Aug 2025).
      • 2.3 crore are over 1 year old.
      • Minor offences clog the system, delaying trials of serious crimes.
    • Governance reform agenda:
      • Aligns with PM Modi’s commitment to remove “unnecessary laws” (reiterated in Independence Day 2025 speech).
      • Supports ease of living and ease of doing business as core NDA governance planks.
    [UPSC 2012] What is/are the recent policy initiative(s)of Government of India to promote the growth of the manufacturing sector?

    1. Setting up of National Investment and Manufacturing Zones

    2. Providing the benefit of ‘single window clearance’

    3. Establishing the Technology Acquisition and Development Fund

    Select the correct answer using the codes given below:

    Options: (a) 1 only (b) 2 and 3 only (c) 1 and 3 only (d) 1, 2 and 3*

     

  • Minimum Public Shareholding (MPS)

    Why in the News?

    SEBI has released a consultation paper proposing changes in Minimum Public Shareholding (MPS) and Minimum Public Offer (MPO) norms for listed companies.

    What is Minimum Public Offer (MPO)?

    • Meaning: When a company launches an Initial Public Offer (IPO), it must sell a minimum number of shares to the public.
    • Analogy: Like a new shop ensuring enough goods are displayed for customers — otherwise trading is thin and controlled by a few.

    What is Minimum Public Shareholding (MPS)?

    • Concept: A company is like a cake. Promoters (founders/owners) usually keep most of it, but SEBI mandates at least 25% must be shared/sold with the public.
    • Purpose:
      • Broader ownership and participation.
      • Fairer prices by reducing manipulation.
      • Greater accountability of companies.

    What SEBI is proposing?

    • Flexibility: Large companies find it difficult to release big chunks of shares at once; rules will be eased.
    • Extended Timelines:
      • Companies valued at ₹50,000–1,00,000 crore now get up to 10 years (instead of 5) to meet 25% MPS.
      • They must reach 15% in 5 years first, then 25% in 10 years.
    • Reduced Burden: For very large companies, the initial Minimum Public Offer (MPO) will be lowered.

    Significance of the Move:

    • Market Stability: Selling too many shares too quickly is like flooding the market — prices may fall even if the company is strong.
    • Benefits:
      • More big companies will list in India.
      • Investors can enter gradually without sudden shocks.
      • Encourages fund-raising while maintaining fair trading.
    [UPSC 2024] Consider the following statements:

    I. India accounts for a very large portion of all equity option contracts traded globally, thus exhibiting a great boom.

    II. India’s stock market has grown rapidly in the recent past, even overtaking Hong Kong’s at some point in time.

    III. There is no regulatory body either to warn small investors about the risks of options trading or to act on unregistered financial advisors in this regard.

    Which of the statements given above are correct?”

    Options: (a) I and II only * (b) II and III only (c) I and III only (d) I, II and III

     

  • Balancing code and commerce in U.K. trade compact

    India–U.K. Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA), especially its Chapter 12 on Digital Trade, marks a shift from cautious digital policy to strategic global engagement. It brings major trade gains, but also sparks debate on data sovereignty and oversight. Chapter 12 of India–U.K. CETA exchanges some regulatory control for greater digital market access. Gains include mutual recognition of e-signatures, duty-free digital exports, and innovation-friendly provisions, while concerns focus on limited source-code checks and voluntary data sharing.

    Digital Gains from the Agreement

    1. Recognition of Electronic Signatures and Contracts: Both nations commit to mutual recognition, reducing paperwork for SaaS firms and lowering entry barriers for SMEs.
    2. Paperless Trade & E-Invoicing: Eases cross-border documentation and payments, enhancing trade efficiency.
    3. Zero Customs Duties on Electronic Transmissions: Preserves a Commerce Ministry–estimated $30 billion software export pipeline.
    4. Regulatory Sandboxes for Data Innovation: Encourages pilot projects that allow payments and data-driven firms to test tools under supervision, boosting credibility abroad.
    5. Duty-Free Access for Indian Merchandise: Nearly 99% of exports could enter the U.K. duty-free; textile tariffs dropping from 12% to zero will aid hubs like Tiruppur and Ludhiana.
    6. Openings in British Public Procurement: Expands market opportunities for Indian IT suppliers.
    7. Social Security Waivers: Reduces payroll costs for short-term assignments abroad by about 20%.

    Digital Costs and Concerns

    1. Source-Code Inspection Restrictions: Ban on routine checks; regulators can only demand access in investigations or court cases.
    2. Voluntary Government Data Sharing: No binding obligation; India decides what data to release, and in what format.
    3. No Automatic MFN for Data Flows: Only a forward review mechanism exists if stricter data rules appear in other agreements.
    4. Review Timelines: First formal review in 5 years; critics suggest 3-year reviews to match rapid AI developments.
    5. Domestic Readiness Gap: Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023 rules are pending notification; absence of clear internal processes could weaken negotiation leverage.

    Balancing Sovereignty and Openness

    1. Security Exceptions Preserved: National supervision over critical infrastructure like power grids and payment systems remains intact.
    2. Good Governance Safeguards: Prevents disguised restrictions on trade under the guise of regulation.
    3. Trusted Labs Proposal: Accrediting secure labs to review sensitive code could bridge the trust gap.
    4. Audit Trails for Cross-Border Data Flows: Ensures accountability follows the data.
    5. Institutionalised Consultations: Open, pre-negotiation dialogue to anticipate and address stakeholder concerns.

    Steps for Future Digital Treaties

    1. Integrate market openness with regulatory oversight
    2. Set three-year review cycles to adapt to technological change
    3. Develop domestic readiness before external commitments
    4. Maintain a balance between security and trade facilitation

    Conclusion

    The India–U.K. digital trade compact is both a leap and a litmus test. It affirms India’s readiness to engage strategically in global digital commerce while underscoring the necessity of robust domestic regulation. The real challenge is not in signing such pacts but in ensuring that sovereignty, security, and innovation move forward together.

    Value Addition

    Reports / Data

    1. Commerce Ministry (2024): India’s software exports via electronic transmissions valued at $30 billion annually.
    2. UNCTAD Report on Digital Economy (2023): India among top 5 global economies in digital services exports.
    3. NASSCOM 2023: Digital public infrastructure (UPI, Aadhaar, DigiLocker) key enablers of India’s digital leap.

    Case Studies / Examples

    1. UPI in G20 (2023): India pushing UPI internationalisation – similar to how digital trade pacts expand India’s reach.
    2. Singapore & Australia FTAs: Precedent for including digital trade rules, but U.K. CETA is India’s first binding digital chapter.
    3. Textile exports from Tiruppur/Ludhiana: Example of how tariff elimination + digital facilitation = trade gains.

    Concepts & Theories

    1. WTO-plus Agreements: Regional/bilateral pacts that go beyond WTO commitments (like CETA’s Chapter 12).
    2. Data Sovereignty vs Digital Openness: Core tension between national control over data and global free flows.
    3. Regulatory Sandboxes: Innovation-friendly regulatory spaces balancing innovation & oversight.

    Quotes for Enrichment

    1. Nandan Nilekani: “India has built digital public goods at population scale, something no other democracy has attempted.”
    2. UNCTAD: “The digital economy is now the fastest growing trade frontier, but also the most contested.”

    PYQ Relevance

    Though there is no direct PYQ, the digital trade compact can be used in many questions like

    [UPSC 2023] What is the status of digitalization in the Indian Economy? Examine the problems faced in this regard and suggest improvement.

    Linkage: The India–U.K. CETA’s digital trade provisions—like e-signatures, paperless trade, and zero customs duty—highlight India’s progress in integrating digitalization into global commerce. At the same time, issues like restricted source-code access, weak data protection readiness, and voluntary data sharing mirror the broader problems of digitalization in India. Thus, the pact underlines both India’s digital gains and the urgent need for domestic reforms and safeguards to fully leverage such agreements.

    Mapping Micro Themes

    1. GS-2: Trade diplomacy, sovereignty.
    2. GS-3: Digital trade, AI regulation, cybersecurity.
    3. GS-4: Transparency, public trust.

  • India Semiconductor Mission (ISM)

    Why in the News?

    The Union Cabinet has approved four new projects under the India Semiconductor Mission (ISM), adding to the country’s push for a robust semiconductor and display manufacturing ecosystem.

    About India Semiconductor Mission (ISM):

    • Overview: Launched in 2021; Operates under the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (MeitY)
    • Purpose: Develop a sustainable semiconductor and display manufacturing ecosystem in India.
    • Scope: Supports the entire value chain — from chip design to fabrication, assembly, testing, packaging, and display manufacturing.
    • Administrative Role: Receives and evaluates applications for schemes under the Semicon India Programme and engages with industry stakeholders to attract investment.

    Key Components:

    • Semiconductor Fabs Scheme: Fiscal support for setting up semiconductor wafer fabrication plants in India.
    • Display Fabs Scheme: Incentives for manufacturing TFT LCD and AMOLED display panels.
    • Compound Semiconductors / Silicon Photonics / Sensors Fab & ATMP/OSAT Scheme: Support for advanced semiconductor technologies and packaging facilities.
    • Design Linked Incentive (DLI) Scheme: Incentives and infrastructure support for IC, SoC, chipset, and semiconductor-linked design projects; administered by CDAC; includes support for startups.
    • Modernisation of Semi-Conductor Laboratory (SCL), Mohali: Upgrading as a brownfield fab.
    • Comprehensive Coverage: Includes manufacturing, R&D, packaging, and design support.
    [UPSC 2012] Recently there has been a concern over the short supply of a group of elements called rare earth metals. Why?

    1. China, which is the largest producer of these elements, has imposed some restrictions on their export.

    2. Other than China, Australia, Canada, Chile, these elements are not found in any country.

    3. Rare earth metals are essential for the manufacture of various kinds of electronic items and there is growing demand for these elements.

    Select the correct answer using the code given below:

    Options: (a)  1 only (b) 2 and 3 only (c) 1 and 3 only * (d) 1, 2 and 3

     

  • What will be the impact of Google antitrust case?

    The Google–Competition Commission of India (CCI), anti-trust case is a pivotal moment for India’s digital market regulation. It revolves around allegations that Google abused its dominant position in the Android ecosystem to indulge in anti-competitive practices, especially through mandatory Google Play Billing System (GPBS) usage and bundling of proprietary apps. The matter now rests with the Supreme Court, which will hear appeals from Google, the Competition Commission of India (CCI), and the Alliance Digital India Foundation (ADIF) in November 2025.

    Background: The Core Dispute in Brief

    CCI’s Key Findings (2022)

    1. Abuse of Dominance under Section 4 of the Competition Act, 2002.
    2. Mandatory use of Google Play Billing System (GPBS) for in-app purchases (15–30% commission).
    3. Self-preferencing — exempting YouTube from GPBS, giving it a cost advantage.
    4. Bundling of Google apps (Search, Chrome, YouTube) with Android licensing.
    5. Imposed a ₹936.44 crore fine and behavioural remedies (decoupling payment system, transparency in billing data, no use of developer data for competitive advantage).

    Google’s Defence

    1. Open-Source Nature: Open-source Android with no obligation to install Google apps if the Play Store is not licensed.
    2. Pre-installation improves user experience and security.
    3. Security and User Experience: GPBS ensures fraud protection and global distribution reach.
    4. Exemptions for in-house services reflect different business models.
    5. Market Competition: Success of major Indian apps (like PhonePe and Paytm) on the Android platform as proof of competitive market

    National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) Ruling (March 2025)

    1. Upheld parts of CCI’s findings (bundling & GPBS abuse).
    2. Reduced penalty to ₹216.69 crore (proportionality principle).
    3. Struck down some remedies, reinstated two key transparency-related directions in review.

    Broader Implications and Stakeholders

    1. Consumers: More choice and possibly lower in-app prices via alternative payment gateways; risk of Android ecosystem fragmentation.
    2. Indian Startups & Developers: Level playing field, competitive payment options, and stronger bargaining power against Big Tech.
    3. Smartphone Manufacturers (OEMs): Greater flexibility to pre-install own services or use alternative Android versions without losing Play Store access.
    4. Google & Global Tech: May need to re-evaluate global Android business model; could trigger similar regulations in other countries.
    5. Regulatory Bodies: Will define CCI’s role in digital market regulation and set precedent for balancing innovation, competition, and consumer rights.

    Conclusion

    The Google antitrust case is not just about app payments — it is about defining the rules of engagement in India’s platform economy. The Supreme Court’s verdict will influence how innovation, competition, and consumer rights are balanced in the digital age. It could either mark a new era of platform accountability or reinforce the status quo, shaping the way over a billion Indians interact with their smartphones

     

    Value Addition:

    Antitrust:

    • It refers to a set of laws and regulations designed to prevent monopolies, stop abuse of market dominance, and ensure fair competition in the market.
    • Purpose: Protect consumers, encourage innovation, and maintain a level playing field for businesses.
    • Example in India: The Competition Act, 2002, enforced by the Competition Commission of India (CCI), is India’s primary antitrust law
    • Example globally: The Sherman Antitrust Act (1890) in the U.S.
    • In simple words: Antitrust laws stop big companies from becoming so powerful that no one else can compete with them fairly.

     

    Mapping Micro Themes

    Subject Topic Name Micro Theme Example
    GS Paper -II Regulatory Institutions Role, functions, and challenges of statutory bodies like CCI & quasi-judicial bodies like NCLAT CCI’s penalty on Google for abuse of dominance; NCLAT’s partial reversal
    Government Policies Policy needs for digital governance & fair digital ecosystem Draft Digital Competition Bill; TRAI’s consultation on platform regulation
    Judicial Intervention Role of judiciary in interpreting digital economy laws Supreme Court hearing Google–CCI appeal
    GS Paper-III Competition Law Abuse of dominance, anti-competitive practices, cartelisation in the digital economy Google Play Billing System commission model
    Digital Economy Impact of Big Tech on market structure, innovation, startups App developers’ reduced bargaining power due to Google’s policies
    Innovation vs Regulation Balancing tech growth and preventing monopolistic behaviour CCI’s remedies vs Google’s claim of user experience efficiency
    Digital Public Goods Need for open, fair ecosystems for inclusive growth UPI as an open-access payment system in contrast to GPBS
    Platform Neutrality Equal treatment for all apps/services on digital platforms Ban on self-preferencing in EU’s Digital Markets Act

     

    PYQ Linkage

    [UPSC 2020] How is the Government of India protecting traditional knowledge of medicine from patenting by pharmaceutical companies?

    Linkage: This question demands explaining legal, institutional, and international mechanisms (like TKDL, Patents Act provisions, WIPO engagement) that protect India’s traditional medicinal knowledge from unfair patenting. Similarly, in the Google–CCI case, India is using competition law and regulatory bodies to protect local digital market interests against global corporate dominance, ensuring fair competition and safeguarding the domestic innovation ecosystem.

     

    Practice Mains Question:

    “In the context of India’s Competition Act, 2002, discuss how the Google–CCI case reflects the challenges of regulating digital platform dominance. Suggest measures to balance innovation and market fairness.”

  • Industrial Accidents in India – The Human Cost of Indifference

    Industrial accidents in India are neither rare nor accidental; they are recurring human tragedies rooted in systemic negligence, regulatory apathy, and corporate cost-cutting. From chemical plant explosions in Telangana to firecracker unit disasters in Tamil Nadu, these incidents underscore a grim reality, industrial safety in India is still treated as a compliance hurdle rather than a fundamental right.

    Magnitude of the Problem

    1. 6,500 workers have died in the last five years in factories, construction sites, and mines averaging three fatalities every day in peacetime.
    2. Centre for Science and Environment (2022): Over 130 major chemical accidents in 30 months post-2020, causing 218 deaths and over 300 injuries.
    3. Small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) are disproportionately involved, often escaping robust inspections.

    Root Causes of Industrial Accidents in India

    1. Regulatory Non-compliance:
      1. Factories operating without Fire Department No-Objection Certificates (NOCs).
      2. Missing or dysfunctional firefighting systems, alarms, and sensors.
    2. Unsafe Work Practices:
      1. Absence of permit-to-work systems for high-risk jobs.
      2. Migrant and contract workers without language-appropriate training or signage.
    3. Infrastructure Failures:
      1. Locked or blocked emergency exits.
      2. Poor maintenance of hazardous material storage.
    4. Weak Enforcement and Accountability:
      1. Safety audits treated as formalities.
      2. Negligible penalties and rare convictions for violations.
    5. Cultural Mindset:
      1. Safety seen as an “overhead” instead of a core operational value.
      2. Class bias — migrant and contract workers’ lives undervalued.

    Comparative Global Perspective

    • Germany, Japan: Safety is embedded into industrial design and workplace culture.
    • South Korea, Singapore: Corporate manslaughter laws hold senior executives criminally liable for gross safety failures.

    Policy and Governance Gaps in India

    1. Industrial safety boards are under-resourced.
    2. Weak whistle-blower protections discourage reporting of hazards.
    3. Digital risk-reporting systems are minimal or absent.
    4. Limited integration between labour inspection, pollution control boards, and disaster management authorities.

    India-Specific Legal and Policy Framework

    1. Factories Act, 1948: Provides provisions on workplace safety, health, and welfare of workers, mandates fencing of machinery, safety officers, and periodic medical examinations.
    2. Occupational Safety, Health and Working Conditions Code, 2020: Consolidates 13 labour laws on safety and health, Introduces provisions for free annual health check-ups, safety committees, and hazard communication.
    3. Environment (Protection) Act, 1986: Framework law for protecting and improving environmental safety, including hazardous process management, Manufacture, Storage and Import of Hazardous Chemical Rules, 1989, Requires industries to prepare onsite and offsite emergency plans.
    4. Explosives Act, 1884 & Petroleum Act, 1934: Regulate storage, handling, and usage of explosive and flammable substances.
    5. Bhopal Gas Leak (Processing of Claims) Act, 1985: First special legislation to address industrial disaster victims’ compensation
    6. National Disaster Management Act, 2005: Guides chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear safety protocols through the NDMA.

    Way Forward

    1. Strengthen Enforcement: Make industrial safety audits independent and transparent; link non-compliance to criminal liability.
    2. Digitisation: Use real-time IoT monitoring for hazard detection and compliance tracking.
    3. Worker Empowerment: Mandate safety training in local languages for all employees, especially contract labour.
    4. Corporate Accountability: Introduce Corporate Manslaughter Legislation for gross negligence causing worker deaths.
    5. Social Responsibility: Shift from post-accident compensation to pre-accident prevention culture.

    Conclusion

    Industrial accidents are not “acts of God” but acts of neglect. India possesses the legal framework to ensure safe workplaces, but without societal outrage, political will, and corporate responsibility, these frameworks remain on paper. For every worker who risks life and limb, industrial safety must be recognised and enforced as a right, not a privilege.

     

    Practice Mains Question:

    “Industrial accidents in India are not acts of fate but outcomes of systemic negligence.” Discuss the causes, implications, and reforms needed, with reference to recent incidents and existing legal frameworks.

    (250 words, 15 marks)

  • Adopt formalisation to power productivity growth 

    Why in the News?

    India’s manufacturing sector is facing renewed scrutiny due to the rising contractualisation of labour, which has grown from 20% in 1999-2000 to 40.7% in 2022-23, according to the Annual Survey of Industries. 

    What drives the rise of contract labour in formal manufacturing?

    • Cost Minimization: Employers hire contract workers to reduce wage bills and avoid social security contributions. Eg: In large firms, contract workers often earn up to 31% less than regular employees.
    • Bypassing Labour Laws: Contracting allows firms to circumvent regulations under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, such as rules on retrenchment and notice period.  
    • Operational Flexibility: Firms use contract labour to scale up or down quickly with demand without long-term obligations. Eg: Seasonal industries like textiles use short-term contract workers during peak export periods.
    • Third-Party Shielding: Outsourcing through contractors protects the principal employer from legal accountability for employment terms. Eg: Automobile assembly lines often outsource non-core work to manpower agencies.
    • Sector-Wide Trend Across Sizes: The rise in contract labour is not limited to small firms; it extends to large and capital-intensive industries. Eg: Between 2000 and 2022, contract labour share doubled from 20% to 40.7% across all industries.

    Why does contract labour hurt long-term productivity?

    • Low Skill Development: Contract workers are rarely given training or upskilling opportunities, limiting their efficiency and innovation. Eg: In India’s electronics manufacturing sector, companies like Dixon Technologies rely heavily on contract labour, leading to a shortage of skilled technicians for precision assembly.
    • High Attrition and Turnover: Contract workers frequently change jobs due to lack of job security, resulting in loss of institutional knowledge. Eg: In food processing units in Punjab, annual turnover among contract workers exceeds 70%, disrupting workflow continuity.
    • Reduced Worker Motivation: Absence of benefits like promotion, pension, or medical cover leads to low morale and reduced effort. Eg: In government-run power plants, studies have shown that contract workers contribute less to maintenance efficiency than permanent staff, affecting overall plant performance.
    • Weak Industrial Relations: Contract workers are often excluded from grievance redressal mechanisms or unions, increasing workplace tensions and risking disruptions. Eg: Maruti Suzuki’s Manesar plant witnessed violent unrest in 2012, partly attributed to discontent between permanent and contract workers.
    • Quality Compromise and Rework: Contract workers may lack the ownership mindset, resulting in errors and product rework, which lowers productivity. Eg: In garment export hubs like Tiruppur, repeated quality rejections from overseas buyers have been traced to inconsistent output from untrained contract labour.
    • Wage and cost gaps act as a disincentive
      • Unequal pay for equal work: Contract workers often earn much less than permanent workers for doing the same job, violating fairness.
         Eg: In PSUs like ONGC, contract workers earn up to 50% less than permanent employees for the same technical work.
      • Avoidance of social security: Employers save costs by not contributing to Provident Fund, gratuity, or health benefits, increasing worker insecurity.
         Eg: A CAG audit of private thermal power plants found 30–40% labour cost savings due to evasion of statutory benefits.

    What are the existing policy?

    • Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970: This law aims to regulate the employment of contract labour in certain establishments and abolish it in specific cases where work is perennial in nature. However, enforcement is weak, and many employers bypass provisions through sub-contracting.
    • Code on Occupational Safety, Health and Working Conditions (OSH Code), 2020: Consolidates 13 labour laws, including those related to health, safety, and working conditions of workers (including contract labour). It mandates registration of establishments and welfare facilities, but monitoring and implementation remain inconsistent.
    • Fixed Term Employment (FTE) provision under the Industrial Relations Code, 2020: Legalises short-term employment contracts with a provision for equal pay for equal work. But in practice, social security benefits and job security are often denied to such workers.

    Way forward: 

    • Ensure Universal Social Protection: Extend mandatory social security coverage (e.g., ESIC, EPF) to all contract and gig workers, with portable benefits and employer accountability, regardless of tenure or contract type.
    • Improve Legal Enforcement and Transparency: Strengthen labour law enforcement through digital compliance portals, randomised inspections, and public disclosure of contract employment data to prevent misuse and promote accountability.

    Mains PYQ:

    [UPSC 2024] Discuss the merits and demerits of the four ‘Labour Codes’ in the context of labour market reforms in India. What has been the progress so far in this regard?

    Linkage: The article talks about the “labour code on industrial relations” introduced in 2020 which is related to the demand of the question. This code, awaiting implementation, aims to provide greater flexibility in hiring and firing by allowing firms to directly hire non-regular workers on fixed-term contracts without third-party contractors. However, it also seeks to curb exploitation by mandating basic statutory employment benefits.

  • [15th July 2025] The Hindu Op-ed: Why is corporate investment lagging behind?

    PYQ Relevance:

    [UPSC 2022] “Economic growth in the recent past has been led by increase in labour productivity.” Explain this statement. Suggest the growth pattern that will lead to creation of more jobs without compromising labour productivity.

    Linkage: The article talks about the corporate investment in India has been lagging, with industrial production slowing down. This question touches on the nature of economic growth and job creation, which is directly linked to investment patterns and their ability to generate sufficient employment. 

     

    Mentor’s Comment:  India’s Index of Industrial Production (IIP) growth slowed to a nine-month low of 1.2%, raising concerns over sluggish corporate investment despite tax cuts, public capital expenditure, and monetary easing. This has reignited debate on the causes of low investment, drawing from Marxist economic theories by Luxemburg and Baranovsky, and highlighting the need for demand revival and effective government stimulus to reboot the economy.

    Today’s editorial analyses the slow corporate investment in India. This topic is important for  GS Paper III (Indian Economy) in the UPSC mains exam.

    _

    Let’s learn!

    Why in the News?

    Recently, India’s industrial output growth dropped to a nine-month low of 1.2%, raising worries about slow corporate investment.

    Why has corporate investment remained low despite tax cuts, capex, and rate cuts?

    • Weak Consumer Demand: Despite tax cuts and improved corporate profits, investment remains low due to insufficient consumer demand in the economy. Eg: Even after the 2019 corporate tax cut (from 30% to 22%), private sector investment in machinery and intellectual property grew only 35% over four years (FY20–FY23), as noted in the 2024-25 Economic Survey.
    • Excess Industrial Capacity: Many industries are operating at suboptimal capacity, making firms hesitant to invest in new production facilities. Eg: With underutilised factories post-COVID, private players see no incentive to expand despite low interest rates and high liquidity.
    • Misreading of Profit-Investment Link: The assumption that higher profits lead to more investment is flawed. As per Michał Kalecki, investment determines profits, not the other way around. Eg: Without a revival in demand, businesses avoid investment regardless of profitability, due to uncertainty about returns.

    About Rosa Luxemburg and Mikhail Tugan-Baranovsky:

    • Rosa Luxemburg (1871–1919): A Polish-German Marxist economist and revolutionary, Luxemburg was known for her critique of capitalist accumulation.
    • Mikhail Tugan-Baranovsky (1865–1919): A Russian economist and early Marxist thinker, Baranovsky challenged traditional Marxist views with his theories on industrial cycles.

    What do Luxembourg and Baranovsky argue about investment in capitalism?

    • Baranovsky’s View – Investment Generates Its Own Market: He argued that in capitalism, investment can sustain itself as long as there is a balanced ratio between the consumption and investment sectors. He believed that machines can produce more machines, and investment can occur even without final consumption demand.
    • Luxemburg’s Counter–Investment Depends on Demand: Luxembourg disagreed, stating that individual capitalists base investment decisions on anticipated demand. If demand is weak and existing capacity underused, capitalists avoid new investments, making demand revival essential for capital accumulation.

    What limits the effectiveness of government capex in crowding in private investment?

    Note: Government capex refers to the expenditure on creating long-term assets such as infrastructure (roads, railways, ports), schools, hospitals, and defence equipment.

    • Gestation lags of infrastructure projects: Large public investments in infrastructure (like ports, highways, railways) take years to become operational. Until completed, they do not immediately enhance productivity or reduce logistics costs, thus delaying private sector response.
    • High import content in capex: A significant portion of government capex may be spent on imported machinery or inputs, which leaks demandout of the domestic economy. This reduces the multiplier effect and fails to generate sufficient local demand for private sector goods and services.
    • Low employment intensity of capex projects: Many infrastructure projects are capital-intensive but not labour-intensive, meaning they create few jobs. This limits income generation and consumer demand, reducing the incentive for private firms to expand production capacity.

    Why is demand revival essential for boosting investment?

    • Drives Capacity Utilisation: When consumer demand rises, existing production units approach their full capacity. This encourages private firms to invest in expanding their capacity to meet growing market needs.
    • Reduces Investment Risk: Strong and predictable demand provides confidence to investors that they will earn returns on capital. Without sufficient demand, firms fear underutilisation of new assets and avoid fresh investments.
    • Stimulates a Virtuous Economic Cycle: Higher demand leads to higher sales, which increases profits, employment, and further consumer spending. This self-reinforcing cycle sustains investment momentum and boosts overall economic growth.

    What is the state’s role?

    • Stimulating Demand through Public Spending: The state plays a counter-cyclical role by increasing government expenditure, especially during economic slowdowns. Eg: Large-scale infrastructure investments in roads, railways, and housing under PM Gati Shakti generate demand, jobs, and confidence in the private sector.
    • Providing Exogenous Stimuli for Investment: The state acts as a catalyst by injecting external demand and resources into the economy when private demand is weak. Eg: PLI (Production-Linked Incentive) schemes offer incentives for capital expenditure in key sectors like electronics and pharma, attracting private investment.
    • Ensuring Access to Affordable Finance: The state, through monetary and fiscal institutions, helps ensure easy credit availability and interest rate stability. Eg: The Reserve Bank of India’s rate cuts and liquidity measures during COVID-19 were aimed at making credit cheaper for industries to invest.

    Way forward: 

    • Focus on Demand Revival: The government must prioritize income support, especially for lower-income households, through targeted welfare schemes and employment guarantees. This will boost consumption, which is essential for stimulating private sector investment.
    • Enhance the Multiplier Effect of Capex: Public capital expenditure should be labour-intensive, locally sourced, and designed to reduce import leakages. This will maximize domestic demand generation and strengthen the crowd-in effect on private investment.