💥Join UPSC 2027,2028 Mentorship (August Batch) + XFactor Notes & Microthemes PDF
Talk to Mentor

Civilsdaily

Login

GS Paper: Federalism

  • Centre-State Disputes: Implications on India’s Economy

    Central Idea

    • In India, disputes between the Central and State governments regarding economic policies have a long history, but in recent years, they have escalated in both frequency and intensity, taking on the character of ‘persistent frictions’ within the federal system.
    • These disputes have significant implications for India’s economy and its federal structure.

    Current Context

    • Impact of Economic Reforms: Economic reforms since 1991 have relaxed many controls on investments, granting some autonomy to States. However, States still rely on the Centre for revenue receipts.
    • Shift from ‘Give and Take’ to Hardened Stance: Recent State resistance has transformed the cooperative Centre-State relationship into a more rigid and confrontational dynamic.

    Emerging Conflict Areas

    • Homogenization of Social Sector Policies: Conflicts arise over the homogenization of social sector policies, where States seek greater discretion, but central agencies push for uniformity.
    • Functioning of Regulatory Institutions: Differences emerge regarding the functioning of regulatory institutions, leading to conflicts over jurisdiction.
    • Powers of Central Agencies: Central agencies attempt to increase their influence, often imposing their preferences on States.

    Economic Consequences of Interference

    • Crowding Out State Investments: Centralization of planning and implementation limits States’ flexibility in infrastructure development. This has resulted in reduced State investments, particularly in projects like roads and bridges.
    • Fiscal Competition: Frictions with the Centre have spurred fiscal competition between States and the Centre. States compete with each other and with the Centre, leading to complexities in welfare provisioning.
    • Inefficiencies Due to Parallel Policies: Frictions have resulted in parallel policies, where either the Centre or States duplicate each other’s efforts. For example, some States have rolled back from the National Pension System (NPS) due to fiscal concerns.

    Inevitable Interdependence

    • Article 258A: The Centre relies on States for the implementation of many laws and policies, particularly in concurrent spheres.
    • Preserving Interdependence: In a large, diverse, developing society like India, interdependence between the Centre and States is inevitable and needs to be maintained.

    Conclusion

    • The growing Centre-State disputes in India’s federal system have far-reaching economic implications.
    • Balancing autonomy and cooperation between the Centre and States is essential for the nation’s economic growth and effective governance.

    Back2Basics:

    Centre-State Financial Relations

     

    Article 268 to 281 Distribution of taxes between the Central Government and States, specifying various taxes and their sharing.
    Article 282 Allows the Central Government to provide grants-in-aid to States for specific purposes, including welfare programs.
    Article 293 Regulates borrowing powers of States, requiring Presidential consent for external borrowing to ensure fiscal discipline.
    Article 280 Establishes the Finance Commission, which recommends tax revenue and grants distribution between the Centre and States.
    Goods and Services Tax (GST) Governed by the Constitution (One Hundred and First Amendment) Act, 2016, and associated laws, transforming taxation in India.
    Fiscal Responsibility and Budget Management (FRBM) Act Guides fiscal discipline and management by setting fiscal targets for both Central and State Governments.
    Inter-State Council Established under Article 263

    Acts as a forum for dialogue between the Central Government and States on various issues.

     

  • One Nation, One Election – wrong problem, bad solution

    What’s the news?

    • The Center has taken a significant step towards implementing the One Nation, One Election concept by forming a committee led by former President Ram Nath Kovind.

    Central idea

    • The recently concluded special session of Parliament has brought into focus the idea of One Nation, One Election as a means to address the challenges posed by frequent elections in India. While this proposal has gained attention, it requires thorough examination and data-driven deliberation before any decisive steps are taken.

    What is the ONOE plan?

    • Concept: The ONOE plan aims to synchronize the timing of the Lok Sabha and State Assembly elections across all states in India to reduce the frequency of election cycles nationwide.
    • Historical Context:
      • After the enforcement of the Constitution on January 26, 1950, the first-ever general elections for both the Lok Sabha and State Assemblies occurred simultaneously in 1951–1952.
      • This practice continued for the following three Lok Sabha elections until 1967, streamlining the election process.
    • Disruption:
      • In 1959, the cycle was disrupted as the Central government invoked Article 356 of the Constitution, leading to the dismissal of the Kerala government due to a perceived failure of constitutional machinery.
      • Subsequent to 1960, defections and counter-defections among political parties led to the dissolution of several state legislative assemblies.
      • This fragmentation resulted in separate election cycles for the Lok Sabha and state assemblies.
    • Current Scenario: Presently, only specific states such as Arunachal Pradesh, Sikkim, Andhra Pradesh, and Odisha conduct their assembly polls concurrently with the Lok Sabha elections.

    Critical analysis

    Excessive Expenditure: A Questionable Concern

    • Rising Election Costs: The cost of elections has been steadily increasing. In 2019, the expenditure for the general elections was about Rs 9,000 crore, averaging about Rs 100 per voter.
    • Political Party Spending: Political parties spent nearly Rs 3,000 crore during the 2019 Lok Sabha elections, with an estimated Rs 50,000 crore informally spent. Addressing this informal expenditure is a primary concern.
    • Data-Driven Decision-Making: The absence of comprehensive data on total public expenditure for separate versus simultaneous elections limits our understanding. To make informed decisions, a meticulous analysis of costs and potential savings is imperative.

    Diversion of Duty: A Matter of Debate

    • Essential Responsibility: While election duty is considered essential for security forces, it’s also a privilege for civilian officials.
    • Lack of Statistical Data: The absence of statistical data showing the exact number of days dedicated to election duties for simultaneous versus separate elections hinders informed decision-making.

    Disruption in Development: A Misconception

    • Model Code of Conduct (MCC): The MCC primarily restricts certain categories of public expenditure during elections, not all development work.
    • Need for Data: The lack of data demonstrating the extent of disruption in development work is a crucial gap in the argument against simultaneous elections.
    • Historical Perspective: Flexibility in Democracy

    Historical context reveals flexibility in Indian democracy:

    • 15 Years of Simultaneous Elections: From 1951–52 to 1967, elections were held simultaneously for 15 years without a specific constitutional provision.
    • Preserving Political Freedom: Imposing limits on election timing could curb political parties’ freedom to express a lack of confidence or engage in democratic processes.

    Local autonomy vs. centralization

    • Local Impact: State-level elections primarily concern local voters and leaders and should not unduly affect voters in other states or the central government.
    • Centralization of Politics: Centralized campaigning diminishes the focus on local governance, weakening local democratic institutions and representation.

    Urgent Priorities for Reform

    • Pressing Issues Abound: India faces a multitude of pressing issues, from natural disasters to public agitations. These challenges can disrupt normal governance and require immediate attention.
    • Nature’s Fury: Natural disasters, such as heavy rainfall or hazardous air quality, often paralyze regions and demand swift government response to alleviate suffering and manage the aftermath.
    • Educational Disruptions: Factors like heatwaves or international events like the G20 meetings can lead to the closure of educational institutions, affecting students’ routines and demanding educational policy adjustments.
    • Protracted Agitations: Protests and agitations, sometimes lasting for months, can bring normal life to a standstill, necessitating government intervention and resolution.
    • Meaningful Electoral Reforms: Rather than focusing on the mechanical scheduling of elections, there is an urgent need for more substantial electoral reforms that enhance transparency and accountability.
    • Managerial Efficiency: Improving the efficiency of election management can be achieved without the need for onerous constitutional amendments.

    Conclusion

    • The proposal for ONOE is intriguing but lacks the necessary data and robust debate to support its implementation. India should prioritize addressing more pressing governance issues and electoral reforms that enhance transparency.

  • Why simultaneous elections would militate against federalism

    What’s the news?

    • The next Lok Sabha election is scheduled to be held before June 16, 2024. Should the concept of simultaneous elections be realized and implemented, it would necessitate the shortening of the terms of legislative assemblies across many states. This alignment could potentially require term extensions or curtailments in 2029.

    Central idea

    • The recent move by the Union government to establish a committee to explore the feasibility of conducting simultaneous elections to various tiers of governance in India has sparked a significant debate. While the idea of simultaneous elections promises cost savings, it also raises crucial questions about its impact on the federal structure of Indian democracy and the unique roles of different governance tiers.

    The Specificity of Governance Tiers

    • India’s governance structure involves multiple tiers, each with distinct roles and responsibilities.
    • Representatives in Indian Governance Tiers:
    • Lok Sabha Representatives: 543
    • Assembly Legislators: Over 4,100
    • Urban Local Ward Representatives: 89,194
    • Elected Panchayat Representatives: Nearly 31.89 lakh (across village panchayats, panchayat unions, and district panchayats)

    The cost-saving argument for simultaneous elections

    • Cost Parity: The 2018 Law Commission report claims that the expenses for Lok Sabha and Assembly elections in any state are approximately equal, forming the basis for the cost-saving argument.
    • Reduced Duplication: Simultaneous elections aim to reduce duplication of administrative efforts, such as voter registration, setting up polling booths, and deploying security personnel, which can lead to cost savings by optimizing resource utilization.
    • Efficient Resource Allocation: Holding elections together allows for more efficient allocation of resources like electoral staff, transportation, and security, as they can be shared across different levels of elections.
    • Streamlined Campaigns: Political parties and candidates can potentially save on campaign costs when elections are synchronized, as they need to conduct campaigns once for multiple levels of government rather than separately.
    • Economies of Scale: The argument posits that simultaneous elections could leverage economies of scale, leading to cost savings across various aspects of the electoral process.

    Implications for Federalism

    • Subsuming Governance Tiers: Simultaneous elections could lead to various governance tiers’ issues being bundled into a single electoral mandate. This might require voters to prioritize a wide range of concerns within a single election, potentially blurring the roles and responsibilities of each governance tier.
    • Federalism Undermined: Such subsumption has the potential to undermine the principles of federalism in India, which involve a clear division of powers between central and state governments, each addressing specific issues.
    • Distinct Roles of Tiers: Federalism recognizes that local issues are best addressed locally, while national issues are the central government’s domain. Simultaneous elections may blur these distinctions, forcing voters to prioritize certain issues due to the single-mandate nature of the elections.
    • Local Autonomy: Local self-governance through municipalities and panchayats could face challenges as simultaneous elections combine local and national issues. This may dilute the focus on local governance.
    • Unique Needs Ignored: India’s governance structure is designed to address the unique needs of citizens at different levels. For instance, local concerns like garbage management are meant to be handled locally. Simultaneous elections might not allow voters to adequately prioritize such local concerns.

    Way forward

    • In-Depth Federalism Assessment: Prioritize a comprehensive assessment of the federal aspects of Indian democracy before proceeding with simultaneous elections. This assessment should analyze the potential impact on federalism, the distinct roles of governance tiers, and the preservation of local autonomy.
    • Transparent Public Discourse: Encourage transparent public discourse and awareness campaigns to ensure that citizens are well-informed about the implications of simultaneous elections. Engage with citizens, experts, and political parties to gather diverse perspectives and concerns.
    • Consultation with State Governments: Conduct extensive consultations with state governments and political parties to understand how simultaneous elections may affect state autonomy and governance. Address the concerns and feedback of state-level stakeholders.
    • Pilot Projects: Consider implementing simultaneous elections on a trial basis in select regions or states to assess the practical challenges and benefits. Pilot projects can provide valuable insights into the feasibility and impact of such a significant electoral reform.
    • Legal and Constitutional Framework: Develop a robust legal and constitutional framework that explicitly accommodates the principles of federalism and the unique roles of different governance tiers. Ensure that the framework safeguards the autonomy of local bodies and addresses the specific needs of each governance level.

    Conclusion

    • While the idea of simultaneous elections in India offers the promise of cost savings, it should be approached with careful consideration of its impact on federalism and the specificity of governance tiers. The committee, led by former President Ramnath Kovind, must conduct a thorough analysis of these federal aspects to ensure that the essence of Indian democracy, with its multifaceted governance structure, is preserved and enhanced.

    Also Read:

    Govt forms committee on simultaneous elections: What is the idea, and the arguments around it?

  • What is the debate around ‘one nation, one election’?

    What’s the news?

    • The government forms a committee to explore the possibility of One Nation, One Election.

    Central idea

    • On September 1st, the Central government established a committee chaired by former President Ram Nath Kovind to assess the viability of the ‘one nation, one election’ (ONOE) proposal. This concept revolves around synchronizing the timing of Lok Sabha and State Assembly elections across all states to reduce the frequency of electoral processes across the country.

    What is the ONOE plan?

    • Concept: The ONOE plan aims to synchronize the timing of the Lok Sabha and State Assembly elections across all states in India to reduce the frequency of election cycles nationwide.
    • Historical Context:
      • After the enforcement of the Constitution on January 26, 1950, the first-ever general elections for both the Lok Sabha and State Assemblies occurred simultaneously in 1951-1952.
      • This practice continued for the following three Lok Sabha elections until 1967, streamlining the election process.
    • Disruption:
      • In 1959, the cycle was disrupted as the Central government invoked Article 356 of the Constitution, leading to the dismissal of the Kerala government, due to a perceived failure of constitutional machinery.
      • Subsequent to 1960, defections and counter-defections among political parties led to the dissolution of several State Legislative Assemblies.
      • This fragmentation resulted in separate election cycles for the Lok Sabha and State Assemblies.
    • Current Scenario: Presently, only specific States such as Arunachal Pradesh, Sikkim, Andhra Pradesh, and Odisha conduct their assembly polls concurrently with the Lok Sabha elections.

    Reports and Perspectives on ONOE

    • Law Commission of India (LCI) Report – 2018:
    • The LCI, led by Justice B. S. Chauhan, issued a draft report in August 2018 that scrutinized simultaneous elections.
    • The report acknowledged the constitutional and legal complexities surrounding this proposal.
    • It emphasized that the current constitutional framework necessitates amendments for the plan to be realized.
    • The LCI also recommended seeking approval from at least 50% of the States for such an overhaul.
    • Despite feasibility challenges, the report recognized potential benefits, including cost savings, reduced administrative burden, timely policy execution, and focused governance.
    • Historical Context – LCI Report 1999:
    • Notably, the LCI, headed by Justice B. P. Jeevan Reddy, supported the concept of simultaneous elections as early as 1999.
    • This historical context underscores that the idea has been debated over time.
    • Balancing Perspectives:
    • The reports and perspectives reveal a dualistic landscape: ONOE offers advantages like efficient governance and reduced election strain, but it’s hampered by practical and constitutional complexities.
    • In assessing ONOE’s viability, the focus is on a well-rounded understanding that considers both the potential benefits and the intricate challenges.

    Concerns Regarding the One Nation, One Election Plan

    • Feasibility and Constitutional Implications:
      • The Constitution outlines fixed tenures (Article 83(2) and 172) for the Lok Sabha and State Assemblies, raising doubts about the feasibility of simultaneous elections.
      • The possibility of mid-term government collapse necessitates a clear mechanism for holding fresh elections or imposing the President’s rule.
    • Federalism and Conceptual Incompatibility:
      • ONOE seems to conflict with the federal structure, contradicting the idea of India as a Union of States (Article 1).
      • Altering this balance might affect the autonomy and authority of state governments.
    • Frequency, Accountability, and Blending of Issues:
      • Frequent elections allow citizens to address national and state issues separately, enhancing accountability.
      • ONOE’s merging of issues might dilute accountability mechanisms and lead to a less-focused governance approach.
    • Cost Misconceptions:
      • While the Central government highlights the substantial costs of frequent elections, critics argue that the actual expenses are not as massive.
      • The analysis questions whether the Election Commission’s expenditure of ₹8,000 crore over five years, amounting to ₹1,500 crore annually or ₹27 per voter per year, is a significant expense for maintaining India’s democratic pride.

    Way forward

    • Comprehensive Constitutional Review:
      • Engage legal experts to meticulously assess necessary constitutional amendments for ONOE.
      • Develop a contingency plan to handle midterm government collapses, ensuring stability and smooth transitions.
    • Balancing Federalism and Centralization:
      • Initiate dialogues with state governments to understand and address their concerns about centralization.
      • Craft a balanced framework that respects both federal principles and national electoral efficiency.
    • Hybrid Accountability Model:
      • Explore a hybrid approach that retains staggered elections for select states while implementing ONOE for others.
      • Maintain distinct accountability mechanisms for national and state issues, promoting effective governance.
    • Transparent Cost-Benefit Analysis:
      • Conduct an independent and transparent assessment of the costs and savings associated with ONOE.
      • Present factual data to address misconceptions and inform stakeholders about the financial implications.
    • Pilots and Gradual Implementation:
      • Begin ONOE implementation through pilot projects in a limited number of states.
      • Assess challenges, gather insights, and refine the approach before nationwide adoption.

    Conclusion

    • The proposal for one nation, one election envisions synchronizing Lok Sabha and State Assembly elections to curtail the frequency of polls. The Indian democracy’s complex dynamics and diverse contexts warrant a comprehensive assessment before implementing such a transformative change.

  • Karnataka complies with Cauvery Water Directive

    cauvery

    Central Idea

    • Karnataka has initiated the release of water from its reservoirs to Tamil Nadu, following the directives of the Cauvery Water Management Authority (CWMA).
    • The outflow from the Krishnaraja Sagar (KRS) Reservoir across the Cauvery River in Mandya district has been escalated.

    Also read:

    Inter-state Water disputes in India

    Increased Outflow Details

    • The current outflow rate into the river is 4,398 cubic feet per second (cusecs), whereas the inflow stands at 2,300 cusecs as of Wednesday.
    • The outflow rate was 2,292 cusecs on Tuesday at 8 p.m. but was increased after 11 p.m.
    • The Kabini Reservoir in Mysuru district also contributes to the outflow, currently standing at 2,000 cusecs.
    • Cumulatively, both reservoirs will release around 6,398 cusecs of water.

    Cauvery Water Sharing Dispute: Historical Background

    • 1892 Onset: The water dispute originates from 1892 between British-ruled Madras Presidency and the princely state of Mysore (now Karnataka).
    • 1924 Agreement: A 50-year agreement mediated by the British aimed to ease tensions but set the stage for future conflicts.
    • Post-Independence Battles: Karnataka’s dam constructions in the 1960s-80s triggered Tamil Nadu’s Supreme Court appeal, leading to the Cauvery Water Disputes Tribunal (CWDT).
    • Interim Measures: The Cauvery River Authority (CRA) implemented interim orders in 1998. Contentious issues persisted despite CWDT’s 2013 award.
    • Final Award: CWDT’s 2013 award allocated water quantities for Tamil Nadu (419 TMC), Karnataka (270 TMC), Kerala (30 TMC), and Puducherry (7 TMC).

    Water Sharing Criteria

    • Monthly Schedule: Karnataka, the upper riparian state, must provide Tamil Nadu a specified monthly water quantity.
    • Annual Allocation: In a “normal” year, Karnataka provides 177.25 TMC to Tamil Nadu, with 123.14 TMC during the southwest monsoon.
    • Challenges: Monsoon disagreements arise due to varying rainfall during this period.

    Constitutional Provisions for Water Sharing

    • Article 262: Empowers Parliament to address inter-State river disputes; IRWD Act, 1956 enacted under this article.
    • Seventh Schedule: Defines legislative authority over water resources in Entry 17 (State List) and Entry 56 (Union List).

    Resolving Cauvery Water Sharing

    (A) Supreme Court’s 2018 Verdict:

    • Cauvery as National Asset: The Supreme Court declared Cauvery a “national asset,” upholding inter-State river water equality.
    • Allocation Adjustments: The Court noted deficiencies in CWDT’s assessment, resulting in marginal relief for Karnataka and reduced allocation for Tamil Nadu.
    • Formation of CMB: The Court directed the establishment of the Cauvery Management Board (CMB) for effective implementation.

    (B) Cauvery Water Management Scheme:

    • CWMA Establishment: Formed to regulate water releases with CWRC’s assistance.
    • Permanent and Technical Bodies: CWMA oversees regulation, while CWRC ensures data collection and award implementation.

    Current Status and Future Implications:

    • Ongoing Challenge: The Cauvery water dispute remains a historical and legal challenge.
    • Resource Management: CWMA and CWRC aim to address the dispute through effective water management.
    • Continued Struggle: The dispute underscores the complexity of water sharing in a federal system and the need for equitable solutions.

    Tamil Nadu’s Contention

    • CWMA’s Decision: CWMA sought 10,000 cusecs for 15 days from Karnataka, but Karnataka proposed 8,000 cusecs up to August 22.
    • Previous Agreement: Karnataka’s refusal to adhere to the earlier agreement of 15,000 cusecs for 15 days at the CWRC meeting angered Tamil Nadu.
    • Distress-sharing Formula: Tamil Nadu supports distress-sharing, but Karnataka hasn’t embraced it.

    Karnataka’s Perspective

    • Rainfall Deficit: Karnataka claims lower rainfall in Cauvery’s catchment areas, including Kerala, leading to reduced inflow.
    • Challenging Situation: Karnataka cites reduced reservoir inflow as the reason for not releasing water this year.
    • Lack of Consistency: Despite endorsing distress-sharing, Karnataka declined to accept the formula.

    Future Scenario

    • Tamil Nadu’s Concerns: Mettur reservoir’s critically low storage affects farmers and upcoming kuruvai crop.
    • Water Shortage: Current water availability may last only 10 days, considering dead storage and drinking water needs.
    • Awaiting Supreme Court: The case’s outcome depends on the Supreme Court’s interpretation and decision.
    • Need for Resolution: The need for a mutually acceptable distress-sharing formula is evident.

    Ongoing Challenges and Factors Prolonging the Dispute:

    • Erratic Water Levels: Flood-drought cycles, pollution, and groundwater depletion cause unpredictable water levels.
    • Idealistic Calculations: SC’s verdict relies on favorable conditions often misaligned with reality.
    • Dependency and Population: Both states heavily rely on the river, causing conflicting urban and agricultural water needs.
    • Inefficient Water Use: Inefficient irrigation methods lead to low crop productivity per unit of water used.
    • Hydropolitics and Delays: Water disputes are used for political mobilization. Prolonged tribunal processes contribute to delays.

  • Inter-state Water disputes in India

    Cauvery

    Central Idea

    • Tamil Nadu has urged the Supreme Court to compel Karnataka to release 24,000 cusecs of water immediately.
    • The state seeks the release of 36.76 TMC for September 2023, as per the Cauvery Water Disputes Tribunal’s (CWDT) award.

    About Cauvery River

    • The Cauvery River, also spelled as ‘Kaveri’ and known as ‘Ponni’ in Tamil, originates from Talakaveri in the Brahmagiri range located in Karnataka’s Kodagu district.
    • It spans approximately 800 km, traversing through the states of Karnataka and Tamil Nadu, until it eventually reaches the Bay of Bengal.
    • The river’s catchment area covers regions in Tamil Nadu, Kerala, Karnataka, and the Union Territory of Pondicherry.
    • Key tributaries that join the Cauvery include Harangi, Hemavati, Kabini, Suvarnavathi, and Bhavani.
    • Distinguishing it from other rivers in South India, the Cauvery remains perennial due to its dual reliance on both advancing and retreating monsoons for rainfall.

     

    Cauvery Water Dispute: Historical Background

    • 1892 Onset: The water dispute dates back to 1892 between the British-ruled Madras Presidency and the princely state of Mysore (now Karnataka).
    • 1924 Agreement: A 50-year agreement mediated by the British aimed to quell tensions but merely laid the groundwork for future disagreements.
    • Post-Independence Battles: Karnataka’s dam constructions in the 1960s-80s sparked Tamil Nadu’s appeal to the Supreme Court. The Cauvery Water Disputes Tribunal (CWDT) followed.
    • Interim Measures: The Cauvery River Authority (CRA) in 1998 implemented interim orders. Contentious issues persisted despite CWDT’s 2013 award.
    • Final Award: The CWDT’s award in 2013 allocated water quantities for Tamil Nadu (419 TMC), Karnataka (270 TMC), Kerala (30 TMC), and Puducherry (7 TMC).

    Water Sharing Criteria

    • Monthly Schedule: Karnataka, the upper riparian state, is mandated to provide Tamil Nadu with a specified water quantity each month.
    • Annual Allocation: In a “normal” year, Karnataka must provide 177.25 TMC to Tamil Nadu, of which 123.14 TMC is during the southwest monsoon.
    • Challenges: The contentious period is the monsoon when disagreements often arise due to varying rainfall.

    Constitutional Provisions for Water Sharing

    • Article 262: Empowers Parliament to address inter-State river disputes; IRWD Act, 1956 enacted under this article.
    • Seventh Schedule: Defines the legislative authority over water resources in Entry 17 (State List) and Entry 56 (Union List).

    Resolving Cauvery Water Sharing

    (A) Supreme Court’s 2018 Verdict

    • Cauvery as National Asset: The Supreme Court declared Cauvery a “national asset” and upheld inter-State river water equality.
    • Allocation Adjustments: The Court noted deficiencies in CWDT’s assessment, leading to Karnataka receiving marginal relief and Tamil Nadu’s allocation reduced to 177.25 TMC.
    • Formation of CMB: The Court directed the establishment of the Cauvery Management Board (CMB) for effective implementation of orders.

    (B) Cauvery Water Management Scheme

    • CWMA Establishment: The Cauvery Water Management Authority (CWMA) was formed to regulate water releases with assistance from the Cauvery Water Regulation Committee (CWRC).
    • Permanent and Technical Bodies: CWMA oversees water regulation, while CWRC ensures data collection and implementation of the final award.

    Current Status and Future Implications:

    • Ongoing Challenge: The Cauvery water dispute remains an ongoing challenge with historical and legal dimensions.
    • Resource Management: The establishment of CWMA and CWRC aims to address the dispute through effective water management.
    • Continued Struggle: The dispute underscores the complexity of water sharing in a federal system and the need for equitable solutions.

    Tamil Nadu’s Contention

    • CWMA’s Decision: The CWMA sought 10,000 cusecs for 15 days from Karnataka, but Karnataka proposed only 8,000 cusecs up to August 22.
    • Previous Agreement: Karnataka’s refusal to adhere to the earlier agreement of 15,000 cusecs for 15 days at the CWRC meeting irked Tamil Nadu.
    • Distress-sharing Formula: TN CM supports a distress-sharing formula, but Karnataka has not embraced it.

    Karnataka’s Perspective

    • Rainfall Deficit: Karnataka claims lower rainfall in Cauvery’s catchment areas, including Kerala, leading to reduced inflow into its reservoirs.
    • Challenging Situation: Karnataka stated that it couldn’t release water as the reservoirs received less inflow this year.
    • Lack of Consistency: Despite Karnataka’s endorsing distress-sharing, the state declined to accept the formula.

    Future Scenario

    • Tamil Nadu’s Concerns: The Mettur reservoir’s storage is critically low, impacting farmers and the upcoming kuruvai crop.
    • Water Shortage: The current water availability may last only 10 days, considering dead storage and drinking water needs.
    • Awaiting Supreme Court: The case’s outcome now rests with the Supreme Court’s interpretation and decision.
    • Need for a Resolution: The pressing need for a mutually acceptable distress-sharing formula is evident.

    Ongoing Challenges and Factors Prolonging the Dispute:

    • Erratic Water Levels: Flood-drought cycles, pollution, and groundwater depletion have led to unpredictable water levels.
    • Idealistic Calculations: SC’s verdict relies on favorable conditions that often do not align with reality.
    • Dependency and Population: Both states rely heavily on the river, causing conflicting water needs for urban areas and agriculture.
    • Inefficient Water Use: Inefficient irrigation methods lead to low crop productivity per unit of water used.
    • Hydropolitics and Delays: Political parties capitalize on water disputes for mobilization. Prolonged tribunal adjudications contribute to delays.

     

    Global Lessons

    1. Good Water Neighbors Project: Collaboration between Israelis, Jordanians, and Palestinians demonstrates the power of dialogue and cooperation for shared water resources.
    2. Nile Basin Initiative: Regional partnership among Nile Basin countries showcases cooperation for equitable water management, enhancing prosperity and peace.

    Conclusion

    • The Cauvery River dispute is a microcosm of water-related challenges in India.
    • To address this century-old struggle, collaborative efforts, sustainable practices, and empowered community involvement are essential.
    • By learning from global examples and innovating locally, a future of equitable water allocation, prosperity, and harmony can be envisioned.

  • Kuki Groups seek Separation from Manipur

    kuki article 3

    Central Idea

    • Kuki Inpi Manipur (KIM), the apex body of Kuki tribes, issued a statement calling for a separate state under Article 3 of the Constitution.

    Manipur violence: A quick recap

    • The ethnic conflict in Manipur originated on May 3 between the Meitei people (valley-based) and the Kuki-Zomi people (hills-based Scheduled Tribe groups).
    • The violence resulted in the forced migration of the two populations, prompting Kuki-Zomi MLAs and various groups to call for separation.

    What is Article 3 of the Indian Constitution?

    • Article 3 grants the Parliament the authority to create new states, modify boundaries, and rename existing states in India.
    • It establishes the legal framework for the reorganization of states within the country.
    • Here is the text of Article 3: Parliament may by law—
    1. Form a new State by separation of territory from any State or by uniting two or more States or parts of States or by uniting any territory to a part of any State
    2. Increase the area of any State
    3. Diminish the area of any State
    4. Alter the boundaries of any State
    5. Alter the name of any State

    Procedural Requirements

    Certain procedural requirements must be fulfilled before enacting changes under Article 3:

    • Presidential Recommendation: No Bill pertaining to these matters can be introduced in Parliament without the recommendation of the President.
    • State Legislature Consultation: If a proposed bill affects the area, boundaries, or name of any state, it must be referred by the President to the concerned state legislature.
    • Time frame: The state legislature is given a specific period to express its views on the proposed changes. Additional time may be granted by the President, if necessary.

    Significance of Article 3

    • Alteration for reasons: Article 3 provides a mechanism to adapt the political boundaries of states in India as per the evolving needs of the nation.
    • Power Sharing: While the Parliament holds the authority to initiate state reorganization, the consultation with the state legislature ensures a democratic process and considers the views of the affected state.
    • Regional Aspirations: Article 3 acknowledges the aspirations of various regions by allowing the formation of new states, thereby promoting regional development and administration.
    • Flexibility: The provision for altering state boundaries enables the government to address demographic changes, regional imbalances, and administrative efficiency.

    Why is the demand by Kukis not feasible?

    • Social and Political Cohesion: The consideration of endorsing separate administrative setups or a greater Mizoram based on ethnic lines raises concerns about social and political cohesion in Manipur.
    • Tensions with Naga Community: Tensions between the Kuki and Naga communities in Manipur complicate the situation and have the potential to escalate conflicts.
    • Unique Cross-Border Presence: The demand for a separate homeland for the Chin-Kuki-Mizo community requires careful evaluation due to its unique cross-border presence and potential for Pan-Nationalism.
    • Implications on Regional Stability: Recognition of a separate homeland would strain relations with Myanmar and Bangladesh, impacting regional stability.

    Conclusion

    • Cautious Decision-Making: The Indian government must navigate the complexities by considering the broader implications on Manipur’s stability, cross-border relations, and the risk of future conflicts stemming from ethnic separatism.
    • Inclusive Dialogue and Peace: Inclusive dialogue, addressing grievances, and promoting peace and unity among all ethnic communities involved are crucial for long-term stability and harmonious coexistence.

  • Finance Commission and the Challenges of Fiscal Federalism

    Finance Commission

    Central Idea

    • The government is set to appoint a Finance Commission in the coming months to address the crucial matter of distributing the Centre’s tax revenue among the States. This article examines the significance of the Finance Commission in India’s fiscal federalism, highlighting the changing dynamics post-reforms and the ensuing debates surrounding the horizontal distribution formula.

    Evolution of the Finance Commission

    • Constitutional Provision: The Finance Commission is a constitutional body established under Article 280 of the Indian Constitution. It was first constituted in 1951.
    • Primary Objective: The primary objective of the Finance Commission is to recommend the distribution of financial resources between the Union (Centre) and the States.
    • Five-Year Cycle: The Finance Commission is appointed every five years, or as specified by the President of India. The recommendations of the Commission cover a five-year period.
    • Composition: The Commission consists of a Chairman and other members appointed by the President. The Chairman is usually a person with a background in economics, finance, or public administration.
    • Terms of Reference: The President determines the terms of reference for each Finance Commission, which guide the Commission in its deliberations and recommendations.

    Significance of the Finance Commission in India’s fiscal federalism

    • Vertical and Horizontal Distribution: The Finance Commission determines the vertical share, which is the proportion of the Centre’s tax revenue that should be given to the States, ensuring a fair allocation of resources. It also formulates the horizontal sharing formula, which determines how this revenue should be distributed among the States.
    • Addressing Fiscal Disparities: The Finance Commission plays a crucial role in addressing these disparities by providing financial transfers to less economically developed states. Through revenue deficit grants and other means, the Commission helps bridge the fiscal gap and supports states with limited revenue-raising capacity.
    • Promoting Cooperative Federalism: The Finance Commission acts as an institutional mechanism that fosters cooperative federalism by facilitating intergovernmental fiscal transfers. It encourages collaboration and coordination between the Centre and the States, fostering a sense of shared responsibility in fiscal matters.
    • Constitutional Mandate: The Finance Commission is constitutionally mandated under Article 280 of the Indian Constitution. Its existence and functioning are enshrined in the constitutional framework, ensuring its independence and impartiality in making recommendations.
    • Five-Year Review Cycle: The regular appointment of the Finance Commission every five years ensures a periodic review of the fiscal arrangements between the Centre and the States. This allows for adjustments and revisions based on evolving economic and social realities, ensuring that fiscal transfers remain relevant and effective.
    • Expertise and Recommendations: The Finance Commission comprises experts in the fields of economics, finance, and public administration. Its recommendations are based on in-depth analysis, consultations, and assessments of various factors, including population, fiscal capacity, and development needs. These recommendations provide valuable insights and guidance to the Centre and the States in fiscal decision-making.
    • Resolving Fiscal Conflicts: The Finance Commission helps resolve conflicts and disputes between the Centre and the States regarding fiscal matters. By providing an independent and objective platform for negotiation and deliberation, it promotes a sense of fairness and transparency in fiscal resource allocation.
    • Strengthening Fiscal Discipline: The Finance Commission plays a role in promoting fiscal discipline and accountability. By assessing the fiscal performance and needs of the States, it encourages responsible fiscal behavior and discourages imprudent spending practices

    Facts for Prelims

    Aspect Vertical Distribution Horizontal Distribution
    Definition Allocation of the Centre’s tax revenue between the Centre and the States Allocation of funds among the States
    Determined by Finance Commission Finance Commission
    Factors considered Fiscal capacity, needs of the States, population figures, and relevant indicators Population, area, fiscal capacity, demographic trends, development indicators, and relevant parameters
    Objective Provide a fair and equitable share of revenue to the States Promote equitable development and address regional imbalances
    Purpose Ensure States have sufficient resources for expenditure requirements and promote balanced development Provide greater financial support to States with lower fiscal capacity and greater development needs
    Focus Centre-State distribution of revenue State-State distribution of funds
    Outcome Ensures fair allocation of revenue between the Centre and the States Reduces disparities and fosters balanced growth among the States

    Finance Commission

    Changing dynamics post reforms

    • Decreased Role of Plan Financing: In the pre-reform era, the Centre had the flexibility to compensate States through plan financing. However, post-reforms, there has been a decline in fresh investments in public sector undertakings (PSUs) and the abolition of the Planning Commission in 2014. As a result, the Finance Commission has become the primary mechanism for the vertical and horizontal distribution of resources, making its role more critical.
    • Devolution of Tax Revenues: With the amendment of the Constitution in 2000, States were given a share in the Centre’s tax revenue pool. This devolution of tax revenues has increased the significance of the Finance Commission in determining the distribution of funds between the Centre and the States.
    • Shift in Population Figures: The use of population figures in determining the distribution of resources has seen a shift from the earlier practice of using 1971 census data to considering 2011 census data. This shift has led to debates and controversies, particularly among States that have successfully controlled population growth rates, as it can affect their share of devolution.
    • Deepening Faultlines: In recent years, faultlines between States have deepened along political, economic, and fiscal dimensions. The outcome of elections and regional disparities in terms of infrastructure, private investment, social indicators, and the rule of law have widened the north-south gap and brought regional imbalances into focus. Managing these faultlines while ensuring equitable distribution poses challenges for the Finance Commission.
    • Concerns of Fiscal Incapacity vs. Fiscal Irresponsibility: The Finance Commission faces the challenge of determining the extent to which a State’s deficit is due to its fiscal incapacity or fiscal irresponsibility. Striking a balance between supporting deficit-ridden States without penalizing fiscally responsible ones is a complex task, as providing more to one State would mean giving less to others.
    • Changing Economic Landscape: The post-reform period has witnessed shifts in India’s economic landscape, with some states experiencing higher growth rates and greater fiscal capacity compared to others. This dynamic requires the Finance Commission to consider the changing economic realities and ensure that the distribution formula reflects the current context

    Addressing the concerns related to cesses and surcharges

    • Clear Guidelines: The Finance Commission should lay down clear guidelines on when and under what circumstances cesses and surcharges can be levied. These guidelines should ensure that cesses and surcharges are not used as routine measures but rather as exceptional instruments to address specific needs or challenges.
    • Cap on Amount Raised: The Finance Commission can suggest a formula or mechanism to cap the amount that can be raised through cesses and surcharges. This would prevent excessive reliance on these instruments and ensure that they do not become a substantial portion of the Centre’s total tax revenue.
    • Transparency and Accountability: The government should enhance transparency and accountability in the utilization of funds generated through cesses and surcharges. It should provide regular reports on the utilization of these funds, demonstrating how they contribute to the intended purposes and benefit the states and the overall economy.
    • Consultation with States: The Finance Commission should engage in extensive consultations with states while formulating guidelines regarding cesses and surcharges. States should have the opportunity to provide their input, share their concerns, and suggest ways to strike a balance between the Centre’s revenue requirements and the states’ financial autonomy.
    • Alignment with Fiscal Responsibility: Any levies on cesses and surcharges should be in line with the principles of fiscal responsibility and budget management. The Finance Commission can ensure that these instruments are used judiciously and do not undermine the fiscal discipline goals set by the FRBM Act.
    • Review and Evaluation: Regular review and evaluation of the impact of cesses and surcharges should be conducted to assess their effectiveness in achieving the intended objectives. The Finance Commission can play a crucial role in monitoring the usage of these instruments and recommending necessary adjustments based on the evaluation outcomes.

    Finance Commission

    Implementing restraint on freebies

    • Clear Definition: Establishing a clear definition of what constitutes a freebie is crucial to avoid ambiguity and misuse of resources. It should encompass measures that go beyond essential public services and infrastructure development and instead focus on non-essential giveaways or subsidies.
    • Fiscal Responsibility and Budgetary Constraints: The Finance Commission can emphasize the importance of adhering to fiscal responsibility guidelines and staying within budgetary constraints. This ensures that resources are allocated judiciously and in a sustainable manner, avoiding the accumulation of unsustainable debt.
    • Prioritization of Essential Services: Encouraging governments to prioritize essential public services, such as healthcare, education, and infrastructure, over non-essential freebies. This ensures that resources are allocated to areas that have a more significant and long-lasting impact on the overall well-being and development of the population.
    • Evaluation of Impact: Regular evaluation of the impact of freebies on the economy, fiscal health, and the intended beneficiaries is essential. This evaluation can help identify any unintended consequences, potential wastage of resources, or negative effects on economic growth.
    • Public Awareness and Discourse: Creating public awareness about the implications of excessive freebies and the importance of responsible fiscal management. Encouraging open discourse and dialogue among citizens, policymakers, and experts can foster a deeper understanding of the long-term consequences of unsustainable giveaways.
    • Role of the Finance Commission: The Finance Commission can play a pivotal role in setting guidelines and recommendations for restraint on freebies. This includes providing advice on responsible fiscal management and ensuring that resource allocation aligns with long-term development goals.

    Conclusion

    • The Finance Commission plays a crucial role in India’s fiscal federalism. To address concerns regarding cesses, surcharges, and freebies, the Commission must provide clear guidelines, ensure transparency, and emphasize long-term fiscal sustainability. Stakeholder consultation, periodic evaluation, and public awareness are key to maintaining a balance between meeting welfare needs and promoting responsible fiscal management.

    Also read:

    The curious case of Fiscal Federalism in India

     

  • Ethnic Tensions in Manipur: Restoring Peace and Rebuilding Trust

    Manipur

    Central Idea

    • The simmering conflict between the Meiteis and the Kukis has escalated due to mutual suspicion and recent events, such as the Manipur High Court’s order to recommend Scheduled Tribe (ST) status to Meiteis and the eviction drive of tribal villages from reserved forests. The failure to address these issues has resulted in the resurgence of ethnic violence, posing a threat to peace and stability in the region

    Community Dynamics in Manipur and Tensions

    • Ethnic Clashes: Manipur has a history of ethnic clashes between communities, particularly between the Meiteis and the Kukis. These clashes often arise due to competition for resources, land disputes, and historical grievances. Mutual suspicion and territorial claims have fueled tensions between various ethnic groups.
    • Land Ownership: Land is a significant source of contention among communities in Manipur. The Meiteis, who primarily inhabit the Imphal valley, face challenges in relocating to the hill areas due to their non-inclusion in the Scheduled Tribe (ST) category. This has led to a sense of deprivation and competition for land ownership between the Meiteis and the hill communities, especially the Nagas and Kukis.
    • Political Representation: The issue of political representation has also contributed to tensions among communities. Different ethnic groups in Manipur strive for adequate representation in governance and decision-making processes. Disparities in political clout and access to resources have fueled grievances and conflicts.
    • Cultural Differences: Manipur is home to diverse communities with distinct cultural practices, traditions, and languages. While this cultural diversity can be a source of richness, it can also lead to misunderstandings and tensions. Differences in religious beliefs, customs, and language can sometimes create divisions and conflicts among communities.
    • Historical Grievances: Historical grievances and conflicts have left lasting scars on community dynamics in Manipur. Past struggles, violence, and insurgent movements have deepened mistrust and created fragmented social landscapes. Lingering resentments from these historical events continue to impact relationships between communities.
    • Socio-economic Disparities: Socio-economic disparities exist among different communities in Manipur. Disparities in access to education, healthcare, and economic opportunities can contribute to tensions and grievances. Economic imbalances and perceived inequalities can strain community relationships.

    Historical Background 

    • Pre-Integration Period: The Meiteis, the majority community in Manipur, had their own distinct socio-political system and cultural practices. They sought to project a pan-Mongoloid identity and had a chequered history of violence and struggles before integration with India.
    • Insurgent Movements: Before integration, Manipur witnessed the emergence of various insurgent groups, such as the People’s Liberation Army, which operated from bases in Bangladesh and Myanmar. These groups sought to address the political aspirations and grievances of certain communities in Manipur, leading to tensions and conflicts with the government and agencies representing the government.
    • Religious and Identity Issues: The Meiteis, who primarily follow Vaishnav Hinduism, had also expressed dissatisfaction with their Hindu identity, as they believed it brought them no political and economic benefits. They had previously attempted to revive an old Meitei religion called Sanamahism and had protested against the presence of Mayangs, or outsiders, including Manipur Muslims called Pangals.
    • Integration with India: Manipur became a part of India in 1949, and efforts were made to integrate the state with the mainstream Indian governance system. Over the years, steps such as protracted military operations, peace talks, political negotiations, improved means of communication, and development were undertaken to facilitate integration and stability in the region.

    Facts for prelims

    Merger of Manipur with the Union of India:

    • Pre-1947: Manipur was a princely state under British colonial rule. The Maharaja of Manipur, Bodhachandra Singh, was the ruler of the state.
    • August 1947: The Maharaja of Manipur signed the Instrument of Accession, agreeing to accede to the Indian Union.
    • 1972: Manipur, along with Meghalaya and Tripura, became a full-fledged state under the North Eastern Region (Reorganisation) Act, 1971

    Who are the Meiteis?

    • Largest community: The Meiteis are the largest community in Manipur.
    • Community’s Language: They speak the Meitei language (officially called Manipuri), one of the 22 official languages of India and the sole official language of Manipur State.
    • Geographical Distribution: Manipur is geographically divided into the Imphal Valley and the surrounding hills. The Imphal Valley is dominated by the Meitei community, which accounts for more than 64% of the population. The hills, which comprise 90% of Manipur’s geographical area, are inhabited by more than 35% recognized tribes, which are largely Christians.
    • Major Festivals: festivals of meiteis are Lai Haraoba, Cheiraoba, Yaosang among others. Also, The Manipuri martial art Thang-ta had its origin in the Meitei knights during the king’s rule.

    Government’s efforts to restore peace in Manipur

    • Deployment of Security Forces: The Indian Army, Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF), Border Security Force (BSF), and Indian Air Force have been deployed to address the ongoing violence and maintain law and order in the region.
    • High-Level Government Involvement: The union Home minister has personally visited Manipur and presided over the peace process. The government has appointed a former Director-General of the CRPF as a security adviser and may appoint an officer from the Tripura cadre as the Director-General of Manipur.
    • Military Operations and Combing Operations: The government has initiated military and combing operations to control the intensity and spread of violence. These operations aim to apprehend perpetrators and restore peace.
    • Relief and Rehabilitation: Relief camps have been set up to provide shelter, food, and support to those affected by the violence. Efforts are being made to rehabilitate displaced individuals and help them return to their homes.
    • Strict Action Against Perpetrators: The government has emphasized taking strict action against those involved in violence. Perpetrators are facing consequences for their actions.
    • Confidence-Building Measures: The presence of security forces and high-level government officials aims to restore confidence among affected communities. The government’s commitment to maintaining law and order and addressing the security situation is intended to instill a sense of security.

    Way ahead: Restoring Peace and Rebuilding Trust

    • Dialogue and Reconciliation: Facilitate open and inclusive dialogue among different communities, encouraging representatives from various ethnic groups to come together and discuss their concerns, grievances, and aspirations. This dialogue should aim to foster understanding, empathy, and reconciliation, creating a platform for finding common ground and building trust.
    • Addressing Land Issues: Develop a fair and transparent mechanism to address land disputes and ensure equitable land ownership rights for all communities. This can involve comprehensive land reforms, effective implementation of land laws, and creating avenues for resolving land-related conflicts through legal means or mediation.
    • Inclusive Governance and Representation: Ensure equitable political representation and participation of all communities in decision-making processes. This can be achieved by promoting inclusive policies, ensuring diverse community representation in legislative bodies, and providing opportunities for marginalized communities to have a voice in governance.
    • Economic Development and Employment Opportunities: Focus on promoting inclusive economic development in Manipur, with a particular emphasis on marginalized communities. Encourage investments in sectors that can generate employment and economic opportunities, ensuring that benefits reach all sections of society. This can help address socio-economic disparities and reduce tensions arising from perceived inequalities.
    • Promoting Cultural Understanding and Diversity: Foster an environment of cultural understanding, respect, and appreciation among different communities. Promote cultural exchanges, festivals, and events that showcase the richness and diversity of Manipuri cultures. Educational initiatives can also play a vital role in promoting intercultural understanding and tolerance.
    • Strengthening Law and Order: Enhance security measures and maintain the rule of law to curb violence and maintain peace. Ensure swift and fair justice for those involved in communal clashes, while also promoting community policing initiatives that foster trust and cooperation between law enforcement agencies and local communities.
    • Rehabilitation and Reconciliation Efforts: Provide rehabilitation and support to those affected by violence and displacement, irrespective of their community background. Implement initiatives that promote reconciliation and healing among affected communities, such as community dialogues, peace-building workshops, and counseling services.
    • Media and Communication: Encourage responsible and unbiased reporting by the media, which can play a crucial role in bridging communities and fostering understanding. Promote media initiatives that highlight stories of cooperation, cultural exchange, and positive community engagements

    Conclusion

    • Manipur’s ethnic tensions require urgent attention to prevent further escalation of violence and to foster lasting peace. By addressing the underlying causes of conflict, implementing effective governance, and ensuring equitable representation and resource distribution, the state can work towards restoring trust and unity among its diverse communities. Only through comprehensive and inclusive approaches can Manipur integrate fully with mainstream India and realize its potential contributions to the nation’s development.

    Must read:

    Manipur: The Demand for Separate Administration and the Challenges Ahead

     

  • Asymmetric Federalism: Examining the Impact of the Delhi Ordinance

    Federalism

    Central Idea

    • The recent promulgation of an ordinance by the Union government, amending the Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi (NCTD) Act, 1991, has raised concerns about federalism, democracy, bureaucratic accountability, executive law-making, and judicial review. This move nullified the Supreme Court judgment that recognized the elected government of Delhi’s legislative and administrative powers over services.

    What is mean by asymmetric federalism?

    • Asymmetric federalism refers to a governance model in which different regions or constituent units within a country are granted varying degrees of autonomy or special provisions based on their unique characteristics, circumstances, or historical factors.
    • It recognizes that not all regions or constituent units are the same and may require different arrangements to accommodate their specific needs and aspirations

    Key points regarding Delhi’s unique position and asymmetric federalism

    • Sui generis status: The Supreme Court recognized that the addition of Article 239AA in the Constitution granted the National Capital Territory of Delhi (NCTD) a distinct and special status. This acknowledgment indicates that Delhi does not fit neatly into the category of either a full-fledged state or a union territory.
    • Examples of special governance arrangements: India’s federal system already incorporates examples of asymmetric federalism. For instance, the special provisions under Article 370 (before its dilution) for Jammu and Kashmir and the protections provided under Article 371, as well as the 5th and 6th Schedule Areas, demonstrate the existence of differential treatment based on regional considerations.
    • Legislative and administrative powers: The Supreme Court’s verdict on May 11 acknowledged that the elected government of Delhi possesses legislative and administrative powers over certain subjects, including services. This recognition further solidifies the idea that Delhi operates under a distinctive constitutional framework, allowing it to exercise powers similar to those of states.
    • Federal entity status: While Delhi remains a Union Territory, the Court’s judgment emphasized that the unique constitutional status conferred upon it makes it a federal entity. This recognition affirms the existence of a distinct arrangement for Delhi within India’s federal structure.
    • Contrasts with Jammu and Kashmir: It is worth noting that the Court’s application of asymmetric federalism principles in Delhi contrasts with the situation in Jammu and Kashmir, where similar principles were not upheld. This discrepancy highlights the need for consistent application and recognition of federalism across different regions.

    Inconsistent Application of Asymmetric Federalism

    • Differential treatment: Inconsistencies arise when different regions or constituent units within a country receive varying degrees of autonomy, special provisions, or protections based on their unique characteristics, historical factors, or political considerations.
    • Unequal distribution of powers: In some cases, certain regions may enjoy greater devolved powers, legislative authority, or administrative autonomy compared to others. This disparity can create imbalances in decision-making and resource allocation, leading to perceptions of favoritism or discrimination.
    • Varying levels of cultural or linguistic protections: Asymmetric federalism may involve granting special cultural or linguistic protections to specific regions or constituent units. However, the extent and nature of these protections can differ, leading to disparities in the preservation and promotion of cultural diversity and linguistic rights.
    • Financial arrangements: Inconsistent application of asymmetric federalism can also manifest in the distribution of financial resources. Some regions may benefit from preferential funding or fiscal arrangements, while others may receive fewer resources, resulting in economic disparities and regional imbalances.
    • Selective application based on political considerations: In some cases, the application of asymmetric federalism may be influenced by political factors, resulting in inconsistent treatment. Regions that align with the ruling party or have greater political influence may receive more favourable treatment, while others may be neglected or marginalized.
    • Perception of unfairness and tensions: Inconsistencies in the application of asymmetric federalism can lead to a sense of unfairness, grievances, and tensions among regions or constituent units. This can undermine trust, unity, and cooperative governance within a federal system.

    Facts for prelims

    Article Description
    Article 123 Empowers the President to issue ordinances during Parliament’s recess.
    Article 239 Deals with the administration of Union Territories.
    Article 239A Provides for the creation of a Legislative Assembly for the Union Territory of Delhi.
    Article 239AA Contains special provisions for the Union Territory of Delhi, including the establishment of a Legislative Assembly and governance structure.
    Article 368 Outlines the procedure for amending the Constitution.
    Article 144 Deals with the binding nature of the Supreme Court’s judgments on all courts and authorities in India.
    Article 213 Empowers the Governor of a state to promulgate ordinances during the recess of the state legislature.

    Challenges Posed by the Ordinance

    • Judicial independence: The swift and brazen act of undoing a Supreme Court judgment through an ordinance raises concerns about judicial independence. While the legislature has the authority to alter the legal basis of a judgment, directly overruling it undermines the independence of the judiciary.
    • Executive overreach: The use of an ordinance, which is meant to address extraordinary situations, for political ends raises questions about executive overreach. The Supreme Court has previously held that ordinances should not be perverted to serve political objectives, indicating that their use should be limited and justified.
    • Constitutional subterfuge: The ordinance adds an additional subject of exemption (services) to the legislative power of Delhi without amending the Constitution. This raises concerns about constitutional subterfuge, as it potentially circumvents the constitutional amendment process and undermines the constitutional framework.
    • Bureaucratic accountability: The creation of a National Capital Civil Service Authority, where appointed bureaucrats can overrule an elected Chief Minister, undermines established norms of bureaucratic accountability. This consolidation of power in the hands of bureaucrats weakens democratic principles and dilutes the authority of elected representatives.
    • Assault on federalism: The ordinance directly assaults the principles of federalism by limiting the control and decision-making power of the elected government of Delhi. It erodes the federal structure by introducing a mechanism where Union-appointed bureaucrats and the Lieutenant Governor can overrule the decisions of the Chief Minister and the elected government.
    • Threat to democracy: The ordinance’s provisions, including the majority voting system and the decision-making authority of the Lieutenant Governor, raise concerns about democratic principles. By allowing unelected officials to wield significant power over elected representatives, it undermines the democratic ideals of representative governance and the will of the people.

    Way Ahead: The Need for a New Politics of Federalism

    • Protection of constitutional values: As the foundations of India’s constitutionalism are threatened, a new politics of federalism is required to safeguard the core values enshrined in the Constitution. Federalism serves as a vital mechanism to ensure a balance of power, protect the rights of states and regions, and uphold democratic principles.
    • Counter-hegemonic idea: By championing the principles of decentralization, autonomy, and cooperative governance, a renewed focus on federalism can challenge the concentration of power and promote a more inclusive and participatory political system.
    • Normative framework: Opposition parties often fail to take a principled stance on federalism or articulate it as a normative idea. A new politics of federalism should aim to establish federalism as a guiding principle based on first principles, emphasizing the importance of cooperative governance, checks and balances, and the protection of regional diversity.
    • Articulating underlying values: A reimagined politics of federalism should consistently articulate the underlying values of federal governance. This includes recognizing the interplay between federalism and democracy, understanding the diverse interests and aspirations of regions, and ensuring equitable distribution of powers, resources, and opportunities.
    • Balancing the centre-state dynamics: A robust politics of federalism can foster a healthy balance between the central government and the states or regions. It should promote dialogue, cooperation, and respect for the autonomy and authority of elected representatives at all levels.

    Conclusion

    • The recent ordinance amending the Government of NCTD Act has ignited debates about federalism, democracy, and bureaucratic accountability. Opposition parties must recognize the importance of federalism as a guiding principle and act to safeguard it. The protection of federalism requires a principled approach that upholds democratic values and ensures the balance of power between different tiers of government.

    Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your personal mentor for UPSC 2024 | Schedule your FREE session and get the Prelims prep Toolkit!

    Also read:

    Delhi Governance New Ordinance