💥Join UPSC 2027,2028 Mentorship (July Batch) + XFactor Notes & Microthemes PDF
Talk to Mentor

Civilsdaily

Login

GS Paper: GS2

  • Strengthening India’s Drug Regulatory Framework for Ensuring Quality Medicines

    Medicine

    Central Idea

    • The recent incidents of substandard and contaminated medicines in India have raised concerns about the quality and regulatory oversight in the pharmaceutical industry. While India takes pride in being the largest manufacturer of generic medicines globally, it is essential to address the persistent quality concerns to maintain its reputation and protect public health.

    Tragic incidents highlighting quality concerns

    • Digital Vision Contamination: In January 2020, 12 children in Jammu died after consuming contaminated medicine manufactured by Digital Vision, revealing the presence of diethylene glycol. Despite previous red flags from drug laboratories, another incident occurred six months later, leading to the death of a two-year-old consuming Cofset cough syrup from the same manufacturer.
    • Nycup Syrup: In March 2021, Nycup syrup was found to have lower levels of the active ingredient, raising concerns about quality control. However, limited regulatory action hindered effective intervention against the manufacturer.

    An overview of the drug regulation mechanism in India

    • Central Drugs Standard Control Organization (CDSCO): The CDSCO, under the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, is the central regulatory authority responsible for the approval, regulation, and control of pharmaceutical products in India. It plays a crucial role in granting licenses, conducting inspections, and monitoring drug manufacturing, import, and distribution.
    • Drug Controller General of India (DCGI): The DCGI is the head of the CDSCO and holds the overall responsibility for drug regulation in India. The DCGI oversees the approval of new drugs, clinical trials, and the regulation of imported drugs.
    • National Pharmaceutical Pricing Authority (NPPA): The NPPA regulates the prices of essential drugs in India to ensure affordability and accessibility. It monitors and controls the prices of scheduled medicines and sets guidelines for the pricing of pharmaceutical products.
    • Pharmacovigilance Program of India (PvPI): PvPI is a national program that focuses on monitoring and reporting adverse drug reactions (ADRs) to ensure the safety of medicines. It encourages healthcare professionals and the public to report any suspected ADRs to a centralized database for analysis and evaluation
    • Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) Protection: The regulatory framework includes provisions to protect intellectual property rights related to pharmaceutical inventions and innovations. This promotes research and development in the industry and encourages the introduction of new drugs.
    • Manufacturing Standards: The CDSCO ensures that drug manufacturers in India adhere to good manufacturing practices (GMP) to ensure that drugs are produced under quality standards and are safe for use.
    • Clinical Trials: The CDSCO regulates clinical trials in India to ensure that they are conducted ethically and with the safety of participants in mind. The CDSCO requires that clinical trials follow the guidelines of the International Conference on Harmonization (ICH).

    Challenges in the Indian pharmaceutical industry

    • Fragmented Regulatory Structure: With approximately 36 drug regulators in India, coordination and consistency in regulatory oversight become challenging. A consolidated and centralized regulatory body can mitigate the risk of regulatory capture and ensure common standards across states.
    • Persisting Quality Concerns: Despite being the largest manufacturer of generic medicines globally, India has encountered quality issues. Recent inspections revealed that 48 drugs failed to meet quality standards, jeopardizing patient safety.
    • Global Reputation at Stake: Observations from global regulators, such as the US FDA, indicate compliance issues in Indian pharmaceutical facilities, potentially tarnishing India’s image as a quality drug manufacturing country.
    • Limited Regulatory Action: In some instances, regulatory action has been limited or challenging to implement due to various reasons, making it difficult to effectively address quality issues and hold manufacturers accountable.
    • Insufficient Transparency and Accountability: The lack of transparency in the drug regulatory regime hinders public trust and confidence. Limited public disclosure of drug application reviews, inspection records, and past violations makes it challenging to evaluate the compliance and track record of manufacturers.
    • Inspection and Enforcement Capacity: The sheer number of pharmaceutical manufacturing units in India, coupled with the large-scale inspection load, puts strain on the inspection teams under state drug controllers.

    Way forward

    • Regulatory Reforms: Amend the Drugs and Cosmetics Act (1940) and establish a centralized drugs database for effective surveillance. Consolidate regional regulators into a single regulatory body to minimize state-level patronage and influence networks. Implement common standards across states.
    • Enhanced Transparency and Reporting: Publish comprehensive reports on drug testing laboratories’ findings and establish a public database of past violations, inspection records, and failure history. Introduce a national law on drug recall, empowering victims and imposing penalties on firms exporting spurious drugs.
    • Strengthening the Central Drugs Standard Control Organisation (CDSCO): Provide statutory backing and establish a Central Drugs Authority as an independent body, ensuring effective regulation and enforcement.
    • Industry Accountability: The pharmaceutical industry should focus on producing quality generic and innovative drugs, moving beyond generic manufacturing. Embrace zero-defect principles and prioritize public health.

    Conclusion

    • Addressing the challenges India’s pharmaceutical industry requires comprehensive reforms, including regulatory consolidation, transparency, enhanced inspections, and industry accountability. By prioritizing patient safety and ensuring the delivery of quality medicines, India’s pharmaceutical industry can reclaim its position as a global leader in drug manufacturing.

    Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your personal mentor for UPSC 2024 | Schedule your FREE session and get the Prelims prep Toolkit!

    Also read:

    India’s delayed implementation of mandatory Drug Recall Law

     

  • Revisiting the Anti-Defection Law: Upholding Accountability in Parliamentary Democracy

    Central idea

    • Two recent judgments by the Supreme Court of India have brought attention to the constitutional framework governing the relationship between the executive, legislature, and political parties. While the judgments were unanimous, they present a contradiction in their application. The Delhi case emphasized the importance of accountability of civil services to the elected government, while the Maharashtra case upheld the power of party leadership over legislators, undermining the principles of parliamentary democracy.

    Delhi Case: Reinforcing the Importance of Accountability

    • Importance of Accountability: The case underscores the significance of accountability in a democratic system. It reaffirms the idea that a government elected by the people must be answerable to them through a triple chain of command: civil service officers being accountable to ministers, ministers being accountable to the legislature, and the legislature being accountable to the electorate.
    • Power Distribution: The judgment clarifies the delineation of powers between the Delhi government, headed by the Chief Minister, and the Lieutenant Governor appointed by the central government. It establishes that in matters concerning civil services, the elected government of Delhi should have control and authority, emphasizing the democratic principle of decentralization of power.
    • Constitutional Provisions and Democratic Values: The case highlights the significance of adhering to the constitutional provisions and demarcation of powers in a Union Territory like Delhi. It upholds the principles of parliamentary democracy, emphasizing the importance of a government accountable to the people it serves.
    • Strengthening Democratic Institutions: The judgment emphasizes the role of institutions in upholding democratic values enshrined in the Constitution. By safeguarding accountability and appropriately allocating powers, it sets a precedent for future cases and reinforces the role of institutions in maintaining a robust democratic system.

    What is triple chain of accountability?

    1. Civil Service Officers to Ministers: The first link in the chain is the accountability of civil service officers to the Ministers. Civil service officers are responsible for implementing government policies and carrying out administrative tasks. They are answerable to the Ministers who oversee their work and provide directions.
    2. Ministers to the Legislature: The second link in the chain is the accountability of Ministers to the legislature. Ministers are accountable for their decisions, actions, and policies to the legislature, which represents the voice of the people. They are expected to participate in debates, answer questions, present bills, and seek approval or support for government initiatives from the elected representatives.
    3. Legislature to the Electorate: The third link in the chain is the accountability of the legislature to the electorate. The elected representatives in the legislature are accountable to the people who have chosen them through the electoral process. Legislators are expected to represent the interests and concerns of their constituents, work towards their welfare, and ensure that their voices are heard in the decision-making process.

    Maharashtra Case: Undermining the Triple Chain of Accountability

    • Interpretation of the Tenth Schedule: The case revolves around the interpretation and application of the Tenth Schedule of the Constitution, which deals with the anti-defection law. The judgment focuses on the distinction between the legislature party and the political party, clarifying the power to issue binding directions to members of the legislature.
    • Role of Party Leadership: The judgment reinforces the authority of the political party leadership over the legislature. It establishes that the person in charge of the political party holds the power to issue directions to the members of the party, including MLAs/MPs, and failure to comply can result in disqualification.
    • Limitation on Legislators’ Accountability: The judgment raises concerns regarding the accountability of legislators to their voters. By upholding the authority of the political party leadership, it potentially weakens the accountability of legislators to the electorate and emphasizes their accountability solely to the party that fielded them in the election.
    • Triple Chain of Accountability: The judgment diverges from the principles outlined in the Delhi case concerning the triple chain of accountability. It suggests that legislators should adhere to the directions of the political party, potentially undermining the daily assessment of the government by the legislature and diluting the accountability of the government to the people.
    • Need for Re-evaluation: The judgment indicates the need for re-evaluating the anti-defection law and its compatibility with the principles of parliamentary democracy. It raises questions about the anti-defection law violating the basic structure of the Constitution, calling for a larger bench to examine this issue.

    Facts for prelims: Basics

    Anti-defection Law

    • The Anti-Defection Law under the Tenth Schedule of the Constitution punishes MPs/ MLAs for defecting from their party by taking away their membership of the legislature.
    • It gives the Speaker of the legislature the power to decide the outcome of defection proceedings.
    • It was added to the Constitution through the Fifty-Second (Amendment) Act, 1985 when Rajiv Gandhi was PM. The law applies to both Parliament and state assemblies.

    Contradictory Conclusions: The Problem of the Anti-Defection Law

    • The contradictory conclusions arising from the application of the anti-defection law in both the cases:
    • Constitutional Position: While the Delhi case emphasizes the accountability of civil services to the Delhi government and upholds the triple chain of command, the Maharashtra case highlights the power of the political party leadership over legislators, as dictated by the Tenth Schedule.
    • Incompatibility with Parliamentary Democracy: The Maharashtra case raises concerns about the anti-defection law, which is at the core of the Tenth Schedule, and its compatibility with the structure underlying parliamentary democracy. The anti-defection law’s assumption that any vote against the party direction is a betrayal of the electoral mandate contradicts the principle of representative democracy.
    • Legislative Accountability: The Maharashtra judgment reinforces the authority of the political party leadership, implying that legislators are primarily accountable to the party that fielded them, rather than to the electorate. This breaks the triple chain of accountability.
    • Impact on Daily Assessment: The Maharashtra judgment’s emphasis on party directions limits the daily assessment of the government by the legislature. If legislators of the party with a majority are bound by party directions, it undermines the meaningfulness of debates, resolutions, and no-confidence motions, as the party leadership controls the votes on every issue, ensuring the government’s victory.
    • Electoral Mandate and Voter Decision: The anti-defection law assumes that voters prioritize party affiliation, disregarding other factors such as candidates’ criminal records, assets and liabilities, and educational qualifications. However, voters’ decisions in elections often contradict this assumption, as demonstrated by instances of legislators winning by-elections after switching parties.

    Way forward

    • Re-evaluation of the Anti-Defection Law: It is crucial to revisit the anti-defection law and assess its compatibility with the basic principles of parliamentary democracy. A thorough examination by a larger Bench of the Supreme Court can help determine if the law violates the basic structure of the Constitution.
    • Reviewing the Tenth Schedule: The Tenth Schedule, which forms the basis of the anti-defection law, should be subject to a critical review. This includes analyzing its impact on the accountability of legislators to their constituents and evaluating whether it aligns with the principles of representative democracy.
    • Strengthening Legislative Accountability: Efforts should be made to reinforce the accountability of legislators to the electorate. This can be achieved by ensuring that legislators prioritize their constituents’ interests over party directives, thereby fostering a stronger connection between legislators and the people they represent.
    • Promoting Informed Voting: Emphasizing the importance of informed voting can help voters make decisions based on factors beyond party affiliation. Providing comprehensive information about candidates, including their track records, assets and liabilities, and educational qualifications, will enable voters to make more informed choices during elections.
    • Balancing Party Discipline and Individual Freedom: Striking a balance between party discipline and individual freedom of legislators is crucial. There should be mechanisms in place that encourage healthy debate, dissent, and the ability of legislators to vote based on their own judgment, while still respecting party affiliations.
    • Enhancing Parliamentary Debates and Oversight: Efforts should be made to strengthen the role of legislatures in holding the government accountable. This can be achieved through robust parliamentary debates, effective question hour sessions, and rigorous scrutiny of government actions and policies.

    Conclusion

    • The contradiction between the Delhi and Maharashtra cases underscores the need to revisit the anti-defection law. A larger Bench should re-examine the law’s compatibility with the basic structure of the Constitution, reaffirming the centrality of accountability in parliamentary democracy. This step is crucial to restore the balance between party loyalty and the representatives’ duty to serve their constituents and uphold democratic values.

    Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your personal mentor for UPSC 2024 | Schedule your FREE session and get the Prelims prep Toolkit!

    Also read:

    [Burning Issue] Shiv Sena Party Symbol Conundrum

     

  • Strengthening Quad: The Need for a Biomanufacturing Hub in India

    Central Idea

    • The Quad, comprised of Australia, India, Japan, and the United States, established a Critical and Emerging Technology Working Group in March 2021 to foster collaboration and explore opportunities in critical and emerging technologies, including biotechnology. However, there remains untapped potential for Quad cooperation in the field of biotechnology. The need of the hour is to establish a Quad-led biomanufacturing hub in India to enhance cooperation and leverage the complementary strengths of Quad nations.

    What is QUAD’s Critical and Emerging Technology Working Group?

    • The Quad’s Critical and Emerging Technology Working Group is a collaborative initiative established by the Quad countries.
    • It was formed in March 2021 with the aim of facilitating cooperation, monitoring trends, and exploring opportunities related to critical and emerging technologies. The working group focuses on identifying and addressing key issues and challenges in areas such as biotechnology, artificial intelligence, cybersecurity, quantum technologies, and other cutting-edge fields.
    • It serves as a platform for the Quad countries to share expertise, exchange information, and coordinate efforts in order to harness the potential of these technologies for economic growth, national security, and societal development.
    • For instance, in the field of 5G, the Quad members have worked on developing telecommunications networks to counter the pervasive presence of China’s Huawei through the use of open radio access (O-RAN) networks.

    Facts for prelims

    Initiative on Critical and Emerging Technologies (ICET)?

    • The ICET initiative was launched by Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi and U.S. President Joe Biden in May 2022, to work together in developing important and new technologies.
    • The Prime Minister’s Office in Delhi and the White House in Washington will oversee and direct the ICET.
    • The ICET’s goal is to increase the technology interaction between the US and India while also potentially adding additional strategic depth and breadth to their growing partnership.
    • It involves collaboration in a range of areas including quantum computing, semiconductors, 5G and 6G wireless infrastructure, and civilian space projects such as lunar exploration.
    • Six focus areas of co-development and co-production includes, 1. Strengthening innovation ecosystems, 2. Defence innovation and technology cooperation, 3. Resilient semiconductor supply chains, 4. Space, 5. STEM talent, and 6. Next generation telecom.

    What is mean by Biomanufacturing?

    • Biomanufacturing refers to the use of biological systems, such as living organisms (microorganisms, cell cultures, or plants), to produce commercially valuable products on a large scale. It involves harnessing the power of biological processes and utilizing them in industrial applications.
    • In biomanufacturing, living organisms are employed as “factories” to perform specific tasks or produce desired molecules. These organisms can be genetically engineered or naturally occurring, depending on the desired outcome.
    • The organisms are cultivated in controlled environments, such as bioreactors, where they are provided with optimal conditions for growth and production. They are fed with specific nutrients, and their growth and metabolic activities are carefully regulated.
    • Biomanufacturing can encompass a wide range of products, including pharmaceuticals, enzymes, biofuels, specialty chemicals, biomaterials, and more.
    • Biomanufacturing is often more sustainable and environmentally friendly, as it relies on renewable resources and has the potential to reduce waste and pollution.

    Why India stands as the ideal choice to host the biomanufacturing hub?

    • India’s ambition of biomanufacturing: India’s National Biotechnology Development Strategy sets a target of reaching $100 billion in the biomanufacturing sector.
    • Existing Infrastructure: India already has existing infrastructure in place, including pharmaceutical manufacturing facilities and research institutions, that can be utilized to establish and expand biomanufacturing capabilities. This infrastructure provides a solid foundation for the development of a biomanufacturing hub.
    • Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Expertise: India has a long-standing reputation as a major player in the global pharmaceutical industry. The country has established expertise in manufacturing and quality control processes, which can be leveraged for biomanufacturing. The experience gained in pharmaceutical manufacturing can be applied to biomanufacturing, ensuring compliance with regulatory standards and maintaining high-quality production.
    • Skilled Workforce: India possesses a large pool of skilled professionals in the life sciences and biotechnology sectors. The country’s workforce includes scientists, engineers, and technicians with expertise in various aspects of biomanufacturing. This skilled workforce can contribute to the success of the biomanufacturing hub by driving research, development, and production activities.
    • Research Output: India has demonstrated its research capabilities in biomanufacturing, ranking high in terms of the quality of research output and the share of research publications. The country’s strong research base provides a solid foundation for innovation and advancements in biomanufacturing processes and technologies.
    • Cost-Effectiveness: India has a competitive advantage in terms of cost-effectiveness. The cost of manufacturing in India is generally lower compared to countries like the United States, making it an attractive destination for cost-efficient biomanufacturing. This cost advantage can contribute to the affordability and accessibility of biomanufactured products.
    • Potential for Affordable Scale: India has the potential to provide affordable scalability in biomanufacturing processes. With its large population and manufacturing capabilities, India can meet the demand for biomanufactured products on a large scale, leading to cost-effective production and availability of essential biopharmaceuticals and other biotechnological products.

    Complementary Strengths of Quad Nations

    • Advanced Biotechnology Innovation Ecosystems: Japan, Australia, and the United States have well-established and advanced biotechnology innovation ecosystems. These ecosystems comprise research institutions, universities, biotech companies, and startups that drive innovation and technological advancements in biotechnology.
    • Funding Capability: The United States, being one of the Quad nations, brings significant funding capability to the table. The U.S. government and private sector invest heavily in research, development, and commercialization of biotechnology.
    • Skilled Workforce: India, as a Quad member, offers a large pool of skilled manpower, particularly in the life sciences field. Collaborative efforts can facilitate knowledge sharing and capacity building to enhance the skills of the workforce across the Quad nations.
    • Manufacturing and Scale-Up Capabilities: India has well-established pharmaceutical manufacturing capabilities. The country has a robust infrastructure and expertise in large-scale production, which can be harnessed for biomanufacturing purposes.
    • Intellectual Property and Technology Transfer: The Quad nations, particularly Japan and the United States, have strong intellectual property protection systems and expertise in technology transfer. Sharing intellectual property and facilitating technology transfer can accelerate the development and commercialization of biomanufacturing technologies, benefiting all Quad nations.
    • Research Output and Innovation: All Quad nations contribute significantly to global research output in the field of biotechnology. They produce high-quality research publications and drive innovation in various subfields of biotechnology. Collaboration within the Quad can facilitate knowledge exchange, joint research projects, and the development of innovative solutions in biomanufacturing.

    Way ahead

    • Collaborative Research and Development: Foster collaborative research and development initiatives between the Quad nations and India. This can involve joint projects, knowledge sharing, and technology transfer to accelerate the development of biomanufacturing processes, products, and technologies.
    • Capacity Building and Skill Development: Establish training programs, workshops, and exchange programs to enhance the skills and knowledge of professionals in biomanufacturing. This can include specialized training in areas such as advanced bioprocessing techniques, quality control, regulatory compliance, and technology transfer.
    • Infrastructure Investment: Allocate resources for infrastructure development, including the establishment of specialized bioreactor facilities, research centers, and manufacturing capabilities.
    • Regulatory Framework Alignment: Collaboratively work towards aligning regulatory frameworks among the Quad nations and India. This involves harmonizing regulations, streamlining approval processes, and ensuring consistent quality standards.
    • Public-Private Partnerships: Foster public-private partnerships to leverage the expertise, resources, and capabilities of both sectors. Engaging industry stakeholders, academia, research institutions, and government agencies in collaborative initiatives can drive innovation, facilitate technology transfer, and accelerate the commercialization of biomanufactured products.
    • International Collaboration: Explore collaborations beyond the Quad nations to foster international cooperation in biomanufacturing. Engaging with countries outside the Quad can expand opportunities for knowledge exchange, market access, and research collaboration.\

    Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your personal mentor for UPSC 2024 | Schedule your FREE session and get the Prelims prep Toolkit!

    Must read:

    QUAD and the Telecom network security

  • Trend of unnecessary Hysterectomies

    hyster

    Central Idea: The Health Ministry in India is concerned about the high incidence of unnecessary hysterectomies, particularly among poor, less-educated women in rural areas.

    Why in news?

    • The Supreme Court has directed States and Union Territories to implement health guidelines formulated by the Centre to monitor and prevent unnecessary hysterectomies.

    What is Hysterectomy?

    • Hysterectomy is a surgical procedure to remove the uterus, and sometimes surrounding organs and tissues.
    • It can be classified as a partial hysterectomy (removal of the uterus), total hysterectomy (removal of the uterus and cervix), or radical hysterectomy (removal of the uterus, cervix, part of the vagina, and surrounding tissues).
    • The procedure can be performed through the vagina or through an incision in the abdomen.

    Issues with such surgery

    • Overuse and unnecessary procedures: Hysterectomy can be performed without exploring alternative treatments.
    • Psychological and emotional impact: The procedure may lead to feelings of loss and changes in body image.
    • Surgical risks and complications: Hysterectomy carries risks such as infection and damage to surrounding organs.
    • Long-term health effects: Removal of the uterus may have impacts on hormones and bone health.
    • Patient autonomy and informed consent: Patients should be fully informed about the procedure and involved in decision-making.
    • Access and equity: Disparities in access to healthcare may contribute to overuse, particularly among marginalized communities.

    Concerns and Petition

    A public interest litigation (PIL) highlighted the occurrence of unnecessary hysterectomies in the states of Bihar, Chhattisgarh, and Rajasthan under government healthcare schemes.

    • Marginalized women were targeted: Women from marginalized communities, such as Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes, and Other Backward Communities, were disproportionately affected.
    • Misuse and Insurance Fraud: Healthcare institutions were found to be misusing hysterectomies to claim high insurance fees from the government under various health insurance schemes.

    Key issue: Violation of Fundamental Rights

    • The recent judgement acknowledges that rising hysterectomy rates among young women in India deviate from trends observed in developed countries.
    • It recognizes the violation of fundamental rights, stating that unnecessary hysterectomies infringe upon the right to health and the right to life under Article 21 of the Constitution.

    Government action and guidelines

    • The Health Ministry has closely monitored the issue of hysterectomies and requested States to share data on hysterectomy cases before and after the implementation of guidelines.
    • Compulsory audits for all hysterectomies are advised, similar to those conducted for maternal mortality, in both public and private healthcare institutions.
    • In 2022, the Health Ministry issued guidelines to prevent unnecessary hysterectomies and urged States to comply with them.

     

    Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your personal mentor for UPSC 2024 | Schedule your FREE session and get the Prelims prep Toolkit!

  • India’s Maternal Healthcare Crisis: A Call for Urgent Action

    Maternal Healthcare

    Central Idea

    • A recent United Nations report revealed a startling reality that India, along with nine other nations, accounted for a staggering 60% of global maternal deaths, stillbirths, and newborn deaths. In 2020 alone, India accounted for over 17% of such fatalities, making it the country with the second-highest number of maternal deaths after Nigeria.

    What is maternal mortality?

    • As per World Health Organization, Maternal death is the death of a woman while pregnant or within 42 days of termination of pregnancy, irrespective of the duration and site of the pregnancy, from any cause related to or aggravated by the pregnancy or its management but not from accidental or incidental causes.

    Gaps in maternal Healthcare in India

    • Maternal mortality rate: A United Nations report highlighted that India was among the top 10 countries responsible for 60% of global maternal deaths, stillbirths, and new-born deaths. In 2020, India accounted for over 17% of such deaths, making it the second-highest contributor after Nigeria.
    • Antenatal care (ANC):1% of mothers in India did not attend any ANC visit during their recent pregnancy. Furthermore, only 34.1% of mothers attended one, two, or three visits, falling short of the World Health Organization’s (WHO) recommendation of four visits.
    • Postnatal care: 16% of women in India did not receive any postnatal health check-ups, while 22.8% experienced delayed check-ups occurring two days after childbirth. In the poorest 20% of the households, 26.3% women never had a postnatal health check-up, whereas among the richest, only 7.9% did not.
    • Lack of skilled health providers: 8% of Indian women did not receive tetanus shots, which are crucial for preventing infections during and after surgery. In about 11% of cases, no skilled health providers were present at the time of delivery, posing risks in detecting and managing complications.
    • Decline in MMR: The Sample Registration System (SRS) 2016-2018 estimated India’s MMR at 113 per 100,000 live births. This represents a decline from previous years and indicates progress in reducing maternal deaths.

    Facts for prelims

    • India’s maternal mortality ratio (MMR) has improved to 103 in 2017-19, from 113 in 2016-18.
    • Seven Indian states have very high maternal mortality. These are Rajasthan, Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Bihar, Odisha and Assam.
    • The MMR is ‘high’ in Punjab, Uttarakhand and West Bengal. This means 100-130 maternal deaths per 100,000 live births.
    • It is ‘low’ in Haryana and Karnataka.
    • The states of Uttar Pradesh, Rajasthan and Bihar have seen the most drop in MMR.
    • West Bengal, Haryana, Uttarakhand and Chhattisgarh have recorded an increase in MMR over the last survey.

    Challenges in achieving further reductions in MMR in India

    • Regional Disparities: States with limited healthcare infrastructure and resources often report higher MMR compared to more developed regions. Bridging these regional gaps in healthcare access and quality is crucial for ensuring equitable maternal healthcare outcomes.
    • Socioeconomic Factors: Socioeconomic factors play a substantial role in maternal health outcomes. Women from marginalized communities, low-income households, and rural areas face higher risks due to limited access to healthcare facilities, education, and economic resources.
    • Quality of Healthcare Services: The availability of skilled healthcare providers, adequate infrastructure, and essential medical supplies is lacking in many parts particularly in remote and ares.
    • Awareness and Education: Limited awareness among women, families, and communities about the importance of antenatal care, skilled birth attendance, and postnatal care hindering timely and appropriate care-seeking behavior.
    • Cultural and Social Factors: Deep-rooted cultural and social factors often influence maternal healthcare-seeking behavior and decision-making. Traditional beliefs, practices, and societal norms directly or indirectly affect women’s access to and utilization of maternal healthcare services.

    Government’s initiatives to improve maternal health

    • National Health Mission (NHM): The NHM is a flagship program of the Government of India aimed at providing accessible and affordable healthcare services, including maternal healthcare. Under the NHM, the Reproductive, Maternal, Newborn, Child, and Adolescent Health (RMNCH+A) strategy focuses on improving maternal and child health outcomes through a continuum of care approach.
    • Janani Suraksha Yojana (JSY): The JSY is a conditional cash transfer program that encourages institutional deliveries and postnatal care utilization. It provides financial assistance to pregnant women from low-income households to cover the cost of delivery and associated expenses. The program aims to reduce financial barriers and promote institutional deliveries, ensuring access to skilled birth attendants.
    • Pradhan Mantri Matru Vandana Yojana (PMMVY): The PMMVY is a maternity benefit scheme that provides cash incentives to pregnant and lactating women for their first live birth. It aims to provide partial wage compensation to pregnant women for wage loss during childbirth and to improve maternal and newborn health outcomes.
    • Janani Shishu Suraksha Karyakram (JSSK): The JSSK program ensures free and cashless delivery, including caesarean section, in public health facilities. It covers the costs of essential drugs, diagnostics, blood transfusion, and transportation for pregnant women and sick infants. The program also provides free referral transport services for pregnant women in need of emergency care.
    • Maternal Death Surveillance and Response (MDSR): The MDSR system is an important component of the government’s efforts to reduce maternal deaths. It focuses on identifying, reporting, and analyzing maternal deaths to understand the causes and take appropriate actions for prevention in the future.
    • National Iron Plus Initiative (NIPI): The NIPI focuses on addressing anemia in pregnant women by providing iron and folic acid supplements. Anemia is a significant risk factor for maternal mortality, and the NIPI aims to ensure universal coverage and adherence to iron and folic acid supplementation during pregnancy.
    • Skill Development Initiatives: The government has also emphasized the training and skill development of healthcare professionals, especially in the field of obstetric and neonatal care. This includes the establishment of skilled birth attendant programs, enhancing the capabilities of healthcare providers, and promoting evidence-based practices for safe deliveries and postnatal care.

    Way ahead

    • Strengthening Healthcare Infrastructure: Investing in healthcare infrastructure, especially in underserved areas, is crucial to improve access to quality maternal healthcare services. This includes ensuring the availability of skilled healthcare professionals, adequate facilities, and essential medical supplies in both urban and rural settings.
    • Enhancing Healthcare Workforce: Strengthening the healthcare workforce through training programs and capacity-building initiatives is essential. This involves increasing the number of skilled birth attendants, midwives, and other healthcare professionals who can provide comprehensive maternal care services.
    • Improving Access and Affordability: Addressing financial barriers is crucial to ensure that all women can access and afford maternal healthcare services. Enhancing the coverage and effectiveness of health insurance schemes, such as the Pradhan Mantri Jan Arogya Yojana (PMJAY), can significantly reduce out-of-pocket expenses for maternal healthcare.
    • Community Engagement and Awareness: Promoting community participation and awareness about maternal health is vital. Community-based programs can play a significant role in educating women, families, and community members about the importance of antenatal care, skilled birth attendance, postnatal care, and recognizing pregnancy-related complications.
    • Strengthening Maternal Death Surveillance and Response (MDSR): Enhancing the MDSR system can provide critical insights into the causes of maternal deaths and inform evidence-based interventions. Establishing robust systems for reporting, reviewing, and analyzing maternal deaths can help identify gaps in the healthcare system and facilitate targeted interventions to prevent future deaths.
    • Empowering Women and Gender Equality: Promoting gender equality and empowering women are fundamental to improving maternal health outcomes. This includes increasing access to education, economic opportunities, and decision-making power for women. Empowered women are more likely to seek and demand quality maternal healthcare services.
    • Collaboration and Partnerships: Collaboration between government agencies, healthcare providers, NGOs, civil society organizations, and other stakeholders is crucial. Partnerships can facilitate the sharing of resources, knowledge, and best practices to drive collective efforts toward reducing maternal mortality rates.
    • Monitoring and Evaluation: Establishing robust monitoring and evaluation mechanisms to track progress and identify areas that require further attention is essential. Regular data collection, analysis, and reporting on maternal health indicators can help assess the effectiveness of interventions and inform evidence-based decision-making.

    Conclusion

    • India’s high maternal mortality rates necessitate immediate interventions to address the gaps in ANC, PNC, awareness, and access to skilled healthcare providers. Bridging the disparities based on education, wealth, and caste is crucial for equitable maternal healthcare. It is imperative to prioritize comprehensive maternal healthcare and take urgent action to save lives and ensure the well-being of women and newborns in India.

    Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your personal mentor for UPSC 2024 | Schedule your FREE session and get the Prelims prep Toolkit!

    Also Read:

    AI to improve maternal and child health in India

     

  • India nears milestone with first indigenous Dengue Vaccine

    dengue

    Central Idea: Serum Institute of India and Panacea Biotec have applied to the ICMR’s call for Expression of Interest for collaborative Phase-III clinical trials for an indigenous dengue vaccine.

    What is Dengue?

    Details
    Transmission Primarily transmitted through the bite of infected Aedes mosquitoes
    Virus and Serotypes Dengue virus belonging to the Flaviviridae family

    Four distinct serotypes: DENV-1, DENV-2, DENV-3, and DENV-4
    Symptoms High fever, severe headache, joint and muscle pain, rash, pain behind the eyes, mild bleeding
    Severe Dengue Progression to severe dengue can cause plasma leakage, bleeding, organ impairment
    Geographic Distribution Endemic in more than 100 countries, particularly in tropical and subtropical regions
    Incidence and Global Impact 100-400 million dengue infections occur annually globally, affecting healthcare systems and economies
    Vector and Breeding Sites Aedes aegypti mosquito breeds in stagnant water containers found near human dwellings
    Treatment No specific antiviral treatment available; supportive care, rest, fluid intake, symptom management
    Prevention and Control Reduce mosquito breeding sites, proper water storage, cleaning of water containers, use of insecticides

     

    Dengue Virus Disease and Global Impact

    • Dengue virus disease causes significant morbidity and mortality worldwide, with 2 to 2.5 lakh (200,000 to 250,000) cases reported annually in India.
    • The global incidence of dengue has increased dramatically, with over half of the world’s population at risk.
    • The World Health Organization (WHO) has identified dengue as one of the top ten global health threats in 2019.
    • Currently, there is no specific treatment for dengue, highlighting the urgent need for effective vaccines.

    Desirable Characteristics of a Dengue Vaccine

    The ICMR highlights the desirable characteristics of a dengue vaccine, including a-

    • Favorable safety profile
    • Protection against all four serotypes of dengue
    • Reduced risk of severe disease and death
    • Induction of a sustained immune response and
    • Effectiveness regardless of previous sero-status and age

     

    Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your personal mentor for UPSC 2024 | Schedule your FREE session and get the Prelims prep Toolkit!

  • In news: Sikkim Statehood Day

    sikkim

    Sikkim Statehood Day

    • Sikkim day is annually celebrated on May 16, commemorating the integration of Sikkim with India in 1975.
    • The process of Sikkim joining India occurred about two decades after Sardar Vallabbhai Patel led the integration of princely states into India.

    Sikkim’s History with the Chogyal Royals

    • The kingdom of Sikkim was established in 1642 when Phuntsong Namgyal was consecrated as the first ruler or Chogyal.
    • Sikkim’s monarchy, under the Namgyal dynasty, lasted for 333 years until its integration with India in 1975.
    • Sikkim had a Tibetan origin and was located between India and China. It often faced conflicts over land with Bhutan and Nepal.
    • The British saw Sikkim as a buffer state and established a formal relationship with it.
    • Various treaties like the Treaty of Tumlong (1861), Treaty of Titaliya (1817), Calcutta Convention (1890), and Lhasa Convention (1904) shaped the relationship between Sikkim and the British.

    Independent India and Sikkim

    • After India’s independence, princely states had the option to accede to India or Pakistan.
    • Sikkim’s unique relationship with British rule led to complexities in its integration with India.
    • Sardar Vallabbhai Patel and BN Rau wanted Sikkim to sign the Instrument of Accession to integrate it with India.
    • Jawaharlal Nehru acknowledged the situation in Sikkim and emphasized its autonomous growth.
    • Sikkim State Congress (SSC), Praja Mandal (PM), and Praja Sudharak Samaj (PSS) demanded a popular government, abolition of landlordism, and accession to India.
    • A Standstill Agreement was signed to maintain the existing arrangement while discussions continued.

    War with China

    • Sikkim had a state council with elected and nominated members.
    • Political developments in the 1960s and 1970s played a significant role in Sikkim’s status.
    • The formation of the Sikkim National Congress (SNC) in 1960 and changes in political leadership on both sides influenced the course of events.
    • India-China war of 1962 and containment of border skirmishes made it important to clarify the relationship between India and Sikkim.

    How Sikkim finally joined India?

    • The Indian leadership started supporting pro-democracy forces in Sikkim, such as Kazi Dorji of the SNC.
    • Protests in Sikkim in 1973 led to a tripartite agreement between the Chogyal, the Indian government, and three major political parties.
    • Elections were held in 1974, and a new constitution limited the role of the monarch.
    • A referendum held in 1975 resulted in a majority vote in favor of joining India.
    • The Constitution (Thirty-Sixth Amendment) Bill was passed, recognizing Sikkim as a state in the Union of India.
    • Sikkim’s new parliament proposed a bill for Sikkim to become an Indian state, which was accepted by the Indian government.

     

    Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your personal mentor for UPSC 2024 | Schedule your FREE session and get the Prelims prep Toolkit!

  • Gaps in Aadhaar-enabled Payment System (AePS) abused by Cybercriminals

    aadhaar

    Central Idea

    • Scammers are using silicone thumbs to operate biometric POS devices and ATMs, draining users’ bank accounts.
    • Incidents of Aadhaar-linked fingerprint misuse and unauthorized withdrawals have been reported.

    What is AePS?

    Details
    What is it? Enables online financial transactions using Aadhaar authentication, eliminating the need for OTPs and other details.
    Supported transactions Cash deposit, withdrawal, balance inquiry, and fund transfer can be done with just the bank name, Aadhaar number, and fingerprint.
    Default activation AePS may be enabled by default for most bank account holders when Aadhaar is linked to their account.
    Mandatory linking for benefits and subsidies Users seeking benefits or subsidies under Aadhaar Act schemes must link their Aadhaar number with their bank account.

    Issues AePS

    • Data breaches: These have been reported, although UIDAI denies breaching Aadhaar data.
    • Information Leak: Criminals can obtain Aadhaar numbers from photocopies and soft copies, using Aadhaar-enabled payment systems to breach user information.

    Securing Aadhaar

    • Regulation: UIDAI proposes regulations to prevent sharing of Aadhaar details without redaction.
    • New two-factor authentication: This combines finger minutiae and image capture for fingerprint liveness.
    • Locking Aadhaar Online: Aadhaar can be locked using the UIDAI website or the myAadhaar app. Locking generates a 16-digit VID code needed for unlocking.
    • Zero Liability: Customers’ entitlement to zero liability arises if unauthorized transactions are reported to the bank within three working days.

    Way forward

    • Immediately lock Aadhaar biometric information if suspicious activity occurs.
    • Inform banks and authorities promptly to initiate necessary actions.
    • Timely reporting ensures the possibility of returning money transferred fraudulently.
    • Regularly check bank accounts for any suspicious activity and inform the banking institution promptly.

     

    Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your personal mentor for UPSC 2024 | Schedule your FREE session and get the Prelims prep Toolkit!

  • [pib] Meri LiFE Mera Swachh Shehar Campaign launched

    life

    Central Idea: The Union Ministry for Housing and Urban Affairs has launched the ‘Meri LiFE, Mera Swachh Shehar’ campaign.

    Meri LiFE Mera Swachh Shehar

    • The campaign focuses on waste management and promotes the principles of Reduce, Reuse, and Recycle (RRR).
    • It aims to create awareness and encourage individuals to adopt sustainable daily habits for environmental protection.
    • The campaign strengthens citizens’ commitment to reducing, reusing, and recycling under Swachh Bharat Mission-Urban 2.0.
    • It aligns with Mission LiFE’s objective of adopting sustainable daily habits for environmental conservation.

    Objectives of the Campaign

    • The campaign involves setting up RRR Centres where citizens can contribute items such as clothes, shoes, books, toys, and plastic for reuse or recycling.
    • The collected items will be refurbished or transformed into new products, aligning with the vision of a circular economy.
    • The RRR approach empowers craftsmen, recyclers, Self Help Groups, entrepreneurs, and startups to convert waste into various products.

    Key initiatives: RRR Centres and Circular Economy

    • The RRR Centres to be launched nationwide will serve as one-stop collection centers for various unused or used items.
    • Citizens, institutions, and commercial enterprises can deposit plastic items, clothes, shoes, books, and toys at these centers.
    • The collected items will be refurbished for reuse or transformed into new products, promoting the government’s vision of a circular economy.

    Back2Basics: Lifestyle for the Environment (LiFE)

    • The LiFE movement was introduced by India during the 26th United Nations Climate Change Conference of the Parties (COP26) in Glasgow in 2021.
    • It aims to promote an environmentally conscious lifestyle that emphasizes mindful and deliberate utilization rather than mindless and wasteful consumption.
    • The movement seeks to replace the prevailing “use-and-dispose” economy with a circular economy characterized by conscious and deliberate consumption.
    • The objective of the LiFE Movement is to leverage the power of social networks to influence social norms related to climate change.
    • It plans to create and nurture a global network of individuals known as ‘Pro-Planet People’ (P3) who are committed to adopting and promoting environmentally friendly lifestyles.
    • Through the P3 community, the mission aims to establish an ecosystem that supports and sustains environmentally friendly behaviours.

     

    Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your personal mentor for UPSC 2024 | Schedule your FREE session and get the Prelims prep Toolkit!

  • India’s Dilemma: Navigating the Indo-Pacific Economic Framework for Prosperity (IPEF)

    Central Idea

    • India’s recent shift from the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) to the Indo-Pacific Economic Framework for Prosperity (IPEF) has raised questions about the motivations behind this decision and the potential implications for the country.

    What is Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP)?

    • RCEP is a trade agreement involving 15 countries in the Asia-Pacific region, namely the 10 member states of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) — Brunei, Cambodia, Indonesia, Laos, Malaysia, Myanmar, the Philippines, Singapore, Thailand, and Vietnam — as well as China, Japan, South Korea, Australia, and New Zealand.
    • RCEP is aimed at creating a regional free trade area, covering a significant portion of the global economy. It is considered one of the largest trade agreements in the world in terms of population, GDP, and trade volume.
    • The RCEP negotiations began in 2012 and were concluded in November 2020. The agreement is seen as a significant development in regional trade integration, particularly in light of rising protectionism and uncertainties in the global trading system.

    What is Indo-Pacific Economic Framework for Prosperity (IPEF)?

    • The IPEF is an economic framework proposed by the United States as an alternative or complement to RCEP.
    • The purpose of the IPEF is to promote economic cooperation, trade, and investment among participating countries in the Indo-Pacific region, with the United States taking a leading role.
    • The article highlights that the IPEF focuses on non-tariff areas such as intellectual property, services, investment, domestic regulations, digitalization, labor, and environmental standards.
    • Unlike traditional trade deals that primarily address tariffs, the IPEF seems to emphasize these broader aspects of economic integration.

    Potential reasons for India’s shift from the RCEP to the IPEF

    • Strategic Partnership with the United States: India’s top foreign policy priority is to develop a strategic partnership with the United States. The shift to the IPEF may reflect India’s desire to align itself more closely with the United States and its Indo-Pacific strategy.
    • Deteriorating Relationship with China: India’s relationship with China has further deteriorated. The decision to join the IPEF could be seen as a way for India to distance itself from China and align with countries that share similar economic and strategic interests.
    • Economic Concerns: India may have had concerns about the potential impact of the RCEP on its manufacturing sector. The fear of cheap Chinese goods flooding the Indian market might have influenced India’s decision to explore alternative economic frameworks like the IPEF.
    • Non-Tariff Issues and Economic Interests: The IPEF’s focus on non-tariff areas such as intellectual property, services, investment, and digital economy might align more closely with India’s economic interests. By joining the IPEF, India may seek to address these issues and negotiate agreements that are more favorable to its domestic industries and economic priorities.
    • Balancing Regional Influence: Joining the IPEF could be part of India’s broader strategy to balance China’s growing influence in the region. By aligning with countries like the United States, Japan, South Korea, Australia, and others in the Indo-Pacific, India may aim to assert its own influence and shape regional economic dynamics.

    IPEF’s four Pillars

    1. Trade: This pillar focuses on facilitating trade and reducing barriers among the participating countries. While India has not joined the trade pillar, there may be pressure for it to do so.
    2. Supply Chains: This pillar aims to establish integrated and efficient supply chains within the participating countries. It likely involves promoting cooperation and coordination in areas such as logistics, infrastructure, and connectivity to facilitate smooth trade flows.
    3. Clean Economy: The clean economy pillar focuses on promoting sustainable development, environmental conservation, and green technologies. It likely involves commitments and cooperation to address climate change, reduce emissions, and promote clean energy and sustainable practices.
    4. Fair Economy: The fair economy pillar aims to establish a fair and level playing field for businesses and promote inclusive economic growth. It likely includes provisions related to competition policy, fair trade practices, and addressing inequalities within and among the participating countries.

    Serious implications for India Joining the IPEF

    • Economic Dependency: Joining the IPEF could result in increased economic dependency on the United States. If the IPEF aims to establish an integrated economic system centered on the U.S., India may become heavily reliant on U.S.-driven policies, which may not align with India’s specific economic interests and priorities. This could limit India’s ability to pursue independent economic strategies.
    • Trade-offs and Market Access: The framework may require India to make trade-offs in various areas, such as agriculture, intellectual property, labor and environment standards, and the digital economy. These trade-offs may involve compromising certain domestic policies or sectors in exchange for market access or participation in the IPEF.
    • Impact on Domestic Industries: The IPEF particularly related to non-tariff barriers, intellectual property rights, and labor and environment standards, could impact India’s domestic industries. Depending on the specific terms, India’s manufacturing sector and other industries may face challenges related to competition, compliance, or market access, which could have implications for employment, growth, and economic development.
    • Policy Constraints: Joining the IPEF could limit India’s policy-making autonomy in key areas such as agriculture, labor, environment, and digital economy. The IPEF may entail commitments that restrict India’s ability to design and implement policies aligned with its national interests, potentially constraining its ability to protect domestic industries, regulate markets, or enact necessary reforms.
    • Implications for Small and Medium Enterprises: The IPEF’s provisions and requirements may disproportionately impact small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in India. Compliance with standards, regulations, or market access requirements could pose challenges for SMEs, potentially hampering their growth and competitiveness.
    • Loss of Sovereignty: Depending on the nature of the IPEF, India joining the framework may entail ceding a degree of sovereignty or decision-making authority to the collective interests of participating countries. This loss of sovereignty could limit India’s ability to shape its own economic policies and respond to emerging challenges or priorities.

    Way ahead

    • Comprehensive Assessment: Conduct a thorough and comprehensive assessment of the potential benefits and risks associated with joining the IPEF. Evaluate the specific terms, provisions, and potential impacts on various sectors of the economy, including agriculture, manufacturing, services, intellectual property, and labor standards.
    • Prioritize National Interests: Clearly define and prioritize India’s national interests in terms of economic growth, job creation, industrial development, and sustainable development.
    • Engage in Negotiations: Actively engage in negotiations and discussions with the participating countries of the IPEF to ensure that India’s concerns, interests, and objectives are adequately represented and addressed. Seek to negotiate favorable terms and provisions that protect and promote India’s economic priorities.
    • Strengthen Domestic Industries: Focus on strengthening domestic industries and sectors to enhance competitiveness and resilience. Invest in research and development, innovation, infrastructure, and skill development to ensure that Indian industries can withstand competition and capitalize on opportunities that arise from participation in the IPEF or other trade frameworks.
    • Diversify Trade Partnerships: While considering the IPEF, continue efforts to diversify trade partnerships beyond the United States and the Indo-Pacific region. Explore opportunities to strengthen trade and investment ties with other countries or regions that align with India’s economic interests and offer potential growth prospects.
    • Foster Regional Cooperation: Promote regional cooperation within the Indo-Pacific region through alternative frameworks or platforms that better align with India’s priorities and ensure a more inclusive and equitable approach to economic integration.
    • Domestic Policy Reforms: Strengthen domestic policy frameworks and institutions to support economic growth, enhance competitiveness, and address challenges related to labor, environment, intellectual property, and other areas covered by the IPEF.
    • Public Consultation and Transparency: Ensure transparency and engage in public consultation processes to seek inputs and feedback from stakeholders, including industry associations, civil society organizations, academia, and experts.

    Conclusion

    • It is essential for India to approach the decision on joining the IPEF with a long-term perspective, taking into account its national interests, economic priorities, and the potential impact on various sectors. A well-informed and strategic approach will enable India to make decisions that maximize benefits and minimize risks for its economy and society.

    Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your personal mentor for UPSC 2024 | Schedule your FREE session and get the Prelims prep Toolkit!

    Also Read:

    Premature membership of RCEP would not serve Indian interests