💥Join UPSC 2027,2028 Mentorship (July Batch) + XFactor Notes & Microthemes PDF
Talk to Mentor

Civilsdaily

Login

GS Paper: GS2

  • First SCO Council of National Coordinators Meeting 2026

    Why in the News?

    The first meeting of the Council of National Coordinators (CNC) for 2026 of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization opened in Beijing, under the chairmanship of the Kyrgyz Republic, to finalise the agenda for upcoming high level SCO summits.

    Council of National Coordinators (CNC)

    • The primary coordination and management mechanism of the SCO
    • Acts as the link between member states and SCO standing bodies
    • Coordination: Synchronises multilateral cooperation in line with the SCO Charter
    • Preparation: Conducts groundwork for meetings of
      • Council of Heads of State
      • Council of Heads of Government
    • Implementation: Oversees execution of decisions taken at previous SCO summits

    Participants

    • Representatives of all 10 SCO member states
    • SCO Secretariat
    • Executive Committee of the Regional Anti-Terrorist Structure (RATS)
    • SCO Secretary General Nurlan Yermekbayev delivered the opening address

    Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO)

    • A permanent intergovernmental international organization
    • The world’s largest regional body by geographic scope and population
    • Represents about 42 percent of global population and over 23 percent of global nominal GDP
    • Established: June 15, 2001
    • Predecessor: Shanghai Five (1996)
    • Headquarters: Beijing
    • Official languages: Russian and Chinese

    Member States of SCO

    • China, India, Russia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyz Republic, Tajikistan, Uzbekistan, Pakistan, Iran, and Belarus
    [2022] Consider the following: 

    1. Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank 

    2. Missile Technology Control Regime 

    3. Shanghai Cooperation Organisation India is a member of 

    which of the above? 

    (a) 1 and 2 only (b) 3 only (c) 2 and 3 only (d) 1, 2 and 3

  • Renewed Conflict Between Syrian Government and Kurds

    Why in the News?

    Renewed fighting has erupted in Syria between government forces led by interim leader Ahmed al-Sharaa and the Kurdish-led Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF), threatening to roll back Kurdish autonomy that has existed since the 2011 civil war.

    Background Context

    • The regime of Bashar al-Assad collapsed in December 2024
    • Ahmed al-Sharaa promised an inclusive administration but pushed for a centralised Syrian state
    • Ethnic and religious minorities, including Kurds, resisted centralisation
    • Sectarian violence resurfaced against Alawites and Druze, followed by clashes with Kurds

    Who Are the Syrian Kurds?

    • Kurds form about 10 percent of Syria’s population
    • Concentrated in north and northeast Syria
    • Long standing demand for autonomy, not secession
    • In 2012, Assad withdrew troops from the northeast
    • Kurds filled the vacuum and declared autonomous regions called cantons
    • These areas together formed the Democratic Autonomous Administration of North and East Syria (DAANES), also called Rojava
    [2016] Consider the following pairs: Community sometimes mentioned in the news : In the affairs of 

    1. Kurd : Bangladesh 

    2. Madhesi : Nepal 

    3. Rohingya : Myanmar 

    Which of the pairs given above is/are correctly matched? 

    (a) 1 and 2 (b) 2 only (c) 2 and 3 (d) 3 only

  • India-EU Free Trade Agreement (FTA)

    Why in the news?

    Recently, the India-European Union Free Trade Agreement (India-EU FTA) was concluded at the 16th India-EU Summit. The conclusion of this FTA positions India and the European Union as trusted partners committed to open markets, predictability, and inclusive growth.

    Key Statistics 

    1. The European Union is India’s one of the largest trading partners. In 2024-25, India’s bilateral trade in goods with the EU stood at INR 11.5 Lakh Crore (USD 136.54 billion) with exports worth INR 6.4 Lakh Crore (USD 75.85 billion) and imports amounting to INR 5.1 Lakh Crore (USD 60.68 billion). 
    2. India-EU trade in services reached INR 7.2 Lakh Crore (USD 83.10 billion) in 2024.
    3. India and EU are 4th and 2nd largest economies, comprising 25% of Global GDP and account for one third of global trade. 

    What is the India-EU FTA?

    1. The India-EU FTA is a comprehensive trade and investment pact designed to liberalize trade in goods and services, enhance market access, streamline customs, and deepen economic cooperation between India and the EU’s 27 member states. 
    2. It is often described as the “mother of all deals” in recent Indian trade diplomacy due to its scale and ambition.

    Why is this FTA historic?

    1. Two-decade effort completed: Talks originally began in 2007, stalled in 2013, and were revived in 2022 before concluding in January 2026.
    2. Massive economic coverage: Encompasses goods, services, investment, customs, rules of origin, digital trade, and SMEs.
    3. Covers about a quarter of global GDP and opens trade between two large markets representing ~2 billion people.

    Key provisions & benefits

      1. India Secures Strategic Access to European Markets: India has gained preferential access to the European markets across 97% of tariff lines, covering 99.5% of trade value
        1. EU gains: Up to €4 billion per year in tariff savings on EU exports like machinery, optical, medical equipment.
        2. India gains: Preferential access for labour-intensive sectors such as textiles, leather, marine products, gems & jewellery, making ~99% of Indian exports duty-free.
      2. India’s offer to the European Union: Overall, India is offering 92.1% of its tariff lines which covers 97.5% of the EU exports, in particular:  
        1. 49.6% of tariff lines will have immediate duty elimination
        2. 39.5% of tariffs lines are subject to phased elimination over 5, 7, and 10 years
        3. 3% of products are under phased tariff reductions and few products are subject to TRQs for Apples, Pears, Peaches, Kiwi Fruit.
      3. Services-the key growth driver of trade in future: Under the FTA, broader and deeper commitments have been secured from the EU across 144 services subsectors, including IT/ITeS, professional services, education, and other business services.
    • Product Specific Rules aligned with existing Supply Chains: Balance origin compliance with global input flexibility, enable self-certification, lower export compliance costs, support MSMEs through quotas, and incentivise Make in India via phased sectoral transitions.
    • Driving Agricultural Growth and Farmer Livelihoods, with adequate Safeguards: Preferential Market Access for agricultural products like tea, coffee, spices, grapes, gherkins and cucumbers, dried onion, fresh vegetables and fruits as well as for processed food products will make them more competitive in the EU.

    Why is the EU’s regulatory regime India’s biggest challenge?

    1. Expanding standards: EU sustainability, labour, environmental and due-diligence rules, including EUDR and corporate sustainability norms, significantly increase compliance costs for Indian exporters.
    2. Non-tariff barriers: Regulations now operate as market-access barriers through traceability and disclosure requirements rather than product safety alone.
    3. MSME stress: Smaller exporters face higher relative costs in documentation, certification and traceability, limiting gains from tariff liberalisation.

    How does CBAM shape the India-EU trade equation?

    1. Carbon cost exposure: CBAM imposes a carbon price on imports of steel, aluminium, cement, fertilisers, and electricity.
    2. Competitiveness risk: Indian producers face higher compliance costs due to coal-based energy.
    3. FTA as a buffer: The agreement offers India leverage to negotiate flexibility, transition timelines, and mutual recognition mechanisms.

    What is the Most-Favoured-Nation (MFN)-Forward Clause on Climate-Linked Trade Measures?

    MFN-forward clause: Under this any future relaxations, exemptions, transition periods, or flexibilities that the EU may grant to other trading partners on climate-linked trade measures, including instruments like CBAM, would automatically extend to India.

    Why this matters

    1. No immediate CBAM relief: The clause does not dilute or suspend CBAM for India.
    2. Future-proofing mechanism: Ensures India is not placed at a relative disadvantage if the EU later moderates CBAM implementation for others.
    3. Indirect safeguard: Functions as the only CBAM-related protection within the FTA by preserving competitive parity, not preferential treatment.
    4. Strategic value: Provides negotiating leverage as EU climate policies evolve under global pressure and WTO scrutiny.
    5. Conditional, not guaranteed: The clause activates only if the EU offers concessions to another partner; it does not create an independent exemption for India.

    Why did India-EU negotiations gain urgency now?

    1. US tariff uncertainty: Accelerating US tariff threats created trade diversion risks for both India and the EU, prompting faster convergence.
    2. Geo-economic shifts: Fragmentation of global value chains after the Ukraine war forced the EU to diversify partners.
    3. Regulatory overreach concerns: Expanding EU regulations raised fears of market exclusion for Indian exporters.

    What makes the EU a critical trade partner for India?

    1. Trade volume dominance: The EU accounts for India’s largest share of goods trade among partners.
    2. Sectoral depth: Strong Indian exports in engineering goods, chemicals, pharmaceuticals, textiles, and refined petroleum.
    3. Services linkage: High potential in IT, professional services, and skilled mobility, though sensitive in negotiations.

    Risks and Limitations of the India-EU FTA

    1. Regulatory asymmetry: EU retains greater rule-setting power in sustainability, labour, and climate standards.
    2. CBAM cost shock: Carbon-linked charges can offset tariff gains for steel, aluminium, cement, and fertilisers.
    3. MSME exclusion risk: Compliance-heavy norms may restrict smaller exporters’ effective market access.
    4. Limited mobility gains: Skilled movement and mutual recognition remain politically sensitive and constrained.
    5. Implementation lag: Phased tariff reductions delay short-term export gains for some sectors.
    6. Compliance substitution: Shift from tariff barriers to regulatory barriers reduces predictability of trade benefits.

    Conclusion

    The India-EU FTA marks a significant expansion of market access and services engagement, but its economic outcomes will be shaped as much by regulatory and climate-linked constraints as by tariff liberalisation. The agreement underscores a structural shift in global trade from tariffs to standards, requiring India to complement external trade gains with domestic regulatory preparedness and export competitiveness.

    PYQ Relevance

    [UPSC 2024] Critically analyse India’s evolving diplomatic, economic and strategic relations with the Central Asian Republics (CARs) highlighting their increasing significance in regional and global geopolitics.

    Linkage: This theme falls under GS Paper II (International Relations), covering India’s bilateral relations and regional groupings affecting its strategic and economic interests. Similar to India-EU engagement, India’s outreach to the Central Asian Republics reflects the use of economic connectivity, trade partnerships, and strategic cooperation to navigate shifting global geopolitics and reduce overdependence on any single power.

  • New UGC regulations sharpen provisions against caste bias

    Why in the News

    The University Grants Commission has notified the UGC (Promotion of Equity in Higher Education Institutions) Regulations, 2026, introducing enforceable mechanisms to address caste-based discrimination in universities. This marks the first time “equity regulations” have been formally issued under UGC’s regulatory powers, rather than as advisory guidelines. The move follows a series of student suicides, including Rohith Vemula (2016) and Payal Tadvi (2019), which exposed systemic failures in grievance redressal. The regulations represent a clear departure from earlier, weakly enforced guidelines by mandating institutional structures, timelines, and penalties.

    What Are the New UGC Equity Regulations?

    1. Legal Framework: Issued under UGC Act powers, replacing advisory norms.
    2. Coverage: Applies to all higher education institutions without exception.
    3. Protected Grounds: Caste, birth, disability, religion, language, gender, and region.
    4. Target Groups: Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes, OBCs, minorities, women, persons with disabilities, and economically weaker sections.

    How Do the Regulations Define Discrimination?

    1. Conceptual Clarity: Defines discrimination as exclusion, restriction, or differential treatment.
    2. Scope Expansion: Covers social, academic, and institutional spaces.
    3. Operational Reach: Includes both direct actions and systemic practices.
    4. Institutional Accountability: Fixes responsibility on authorities, not just individuals.

    What Institutional Mechanisms Are Mandated?

    Equity Officer (EO)

    1. Appointment: Mandatory in every institution.
    2. Role: Coordinates equity policies and grievance handling.
    3. Support: Liaison with administration, police, and district authorities.
    4. Faculty Involvement: Faculty members serve as institutional representatives.

    Equal Opportunity Centre (EOC)

    1. Structure: Statutory body within each institution.
    2. Functions: Receives complaints, monitors discrimination, provides legal aid.
    3. Continuity: Reinforces EOCs mandated since 2012 with enforcement powers.
    4. Compliance: Failure attracts regulatory consequences.

    Equity Committee

    1. Leadership: Headed by the institutional head.
    2. Composition: Reserved category members mandatory.
    3. Jurisdiction: Reviews complaints, directs corrective action.
    4. Timeline: Complaint reports submitted within 15 days.

    How Is Grievance Redressal Strengthened?

    1. Time-Bound Action: Institutional head must act within seven days.
    2. Escalation Mechanism: Non-compliance escalated to UGC.
    3. Monitoring: National-level oversight committee introduced.
    4. Sanctions: Non-compliant institutions barred from UGC schemes and funding.

    How Are These Regulations Different from 2012 Guidelines?

    1. From Advisory to Mandatory: Converts soft guidelines into enforceable rules.
    2. Punitive Powers: Introduces institutional penalties.
    3. Monitoring Framework: Adds national-level compliance review.
    4. Operational Precision: Specifies timelines, responsibilities, and reporting formats.

    What Provisions Address Campus Culture and Reporting?

    1. Equity Helpline: 24×7 helpline for discrimination complaints.
    2. Equity Ambassadors: Student and faculty representatives.
    3. Role Definition: Act as “torchbearers of equity”.
    4. Preventive Approach: Focus on awareness, not only punishment.

    What Are the Draft and Final Regulation Changes?

    1. Removed Provision: Penalty for “false complaints” dropped.
    2. Rationale: Avoids chilling effect on marginalised complainants.
    3. Institutional Penalties: Retained against institutions, not individuals.
    4. Clarity Added: Detailed complaint disposal procedures introduced.

    What Is the Controversy Over the Regulations?

    1. Student Opposition: Concerns raised by OBC and student groups.
    2. Core Demand: Inclusion of OBCs explicitly in Scheduled Caste/Tribe protections.
    3. Fear of Misuse: Allegations of incentivising false complaints.
    4. Political Dimension: Hashtags and protests indicate social mobilisation.

    Conclusion

    The UGC (Promotion of Equity in Higher Education Institutions) Regulations, 2026 institutionalise social justice within university governance by converting constitutional principles of equality and non-discrimination into enforceable administrative duties. By mandating equity officers, statutory committees, time-bound grievance redressal, and regulatory sanctions, the framework addresses long-standing gaps between policy intent and campus reality. The regulations signal a shift from symbolic inclusion to rule-based accountability, while their effectiveness will ultimately depend on consistent enforcement, institutional capacity, and sustained oversight by the UGC.

    PYQ Relevance

    [UPSC 2022] “The Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 remains only a legal document without intense sensitisation of government functionaries and citizens.” Comment.

    Linkage: Highlights the recurring UPSC theme of law, implementation gap, similar to how earlier UGC guidelines failed due to lack of enforcement, now addressed through binding equity regulations.

  • How will U.S. exit affect solar alliance

    Why in the News?

    In January 2025, the United States withdrew from 66 international organisations, including the International Solar Alliance (ISA), signalling a clear retreat from multilateral climate cooperation. This is important because the U.S. had joined ISA only in late 2021, and its exit goes against the growing need for global climate finance and technology sharing. Although the U.S. contributed only about 1% of ISA’s total funds, its withdrawal raises concerns about global confidence, leadership, and funding for solar projects, especially in Africa and poorer developing countries.

    What is the International Solar Alliance (ISA)?

    1. Institutional Mandate: Facilitates affordable solar power deployment by reducing project risk, mobilising finance, and accelerating technology adoption.
    2. Establishment: Founded in 2015 and headquartered in India as a joint India-France initiative.
    3. Membership Base: Covers over 120 countries across Africa, Asia, and island states.
    4. Operational Role: Enables access to finance, training, and investor confidence rather than directly building solar plants.

    How significant was the U.S. role within the ISA?

    1. Limited Financial Contribution: Accounts for only about 1% of ISA’s total funding, limiting direct fiscal impact.
    2. Late Entry: Joined the Alliance only in late 2021, indicating limited institutional integration.
    3. Ongoing Continuity: Indian officials indicate existing programmes will continue without disruption.

    Will India’s solar manufacturing sector be affected?

    1. Domestic Manufacturing Strength: India’s solar module manufacturing capacity is projected to reach 144 GW by 2026, up from 25 GW earlier.
    2. Import Dependence Decline: India has reduced reliance on imported solar components, particularly from China.
    3. Market Share Indicator: Indian manufacturers already supply over 70% of domestic solar module demand.
    4. Cost Stability: The U.S. exit does not affect electricity tariffs or domestic solar affordability.

    Will investments in India’s solar projects slow down?

    1. Domestic Demand Driven: Most solar projects are backed by Indian power demand rather than foreign aid.
    2. Contract Stability: Projects operate under long-term contracts with state and central agencies.
    3. Investor Confidence: Strong policy continuity and power sector reforms sustain investor interest.
    4. Employment Trends: Solar job growth remains strong across manufacturing, installation, and operations.

    Where does the real economic risk lie?

    1. Regional Impact Concentration: Africa and poorer developing countries face higher vulnerability.
    2. Finance Dependence: These regions rely heavily on concessional lending and multilateral climate engagement.
    3. Lender Behaviour: Reduced U.S. climate engagement may slow approvals and increase lender caution.
    4. Export Exposure: Indian firms executing overseas solar projects may face indirect slowdown.

    Does the U.S. exit weaken India’s climate diplomacy?

    1. Leadership Continuity: India remains the central driver of ISA’s agenda and operations.
    2. Diplomatic Influence: ISA continues to function as a strategic diplomatic tool in the Global South.
    3. Responsibility Shift: India now bears greater responsibility for financing mobilisation and leadership.

    What lies ahead for solar energy in India?

    1. Grid Integration Challenge: Storage, grid stability, and transmission infrastructure remain key bottlenecks.
    2. Capital Mobilisation: Attracting affordable finance remains critical amid global fragmentation.
    3. Preparedness Indicator: India appears better positioned today than a decade ago to absorb such shocks.

    Conclusion

    The U.S. withdrawal from the International Solar Alliance does not materially weaken India’s domestic solar sector, which is now driven by strong manufacturing capacity and internal demand. However, it exposes the vulnerability of global climate cooperation, particularly for developing countries dependent on multilateral finance. Going forward, India’s leadership within ISA becomes more critical to sustain solar deployment, mobilise climate finance, and uphold collective action in an increasingly fragmented global climate order.

    International Solar Alliance (ISA)

    1. Launch and Leadership: Launched in 2015 by India and France to promote solar energy deployment among tropical countries.
    2. Legal Status: Became a treaty-based intergovernmental organisation in 2017, giving it formal international legitimacy.
    3. Headquarters: Located in Gurugram, India, reinforcing India’s role in global climate governance.
    4. Membership: Comprises 120+ member countries, primarily from Africa, Asia, and Small Island Developing States.
    5. Core Objective: Enables affordable, reliable, and scalable solar energy by reducing project risk and mobilising finance.
    6. Operational Focus: Works through capacity building, technical assistance, and investment facilitation, rather than direct project execution.
    7. Strategic Significance for India: Strengthens South-South cooperation, enhances climate diplomacy, and supports India’s leadership in the Global South.

    PYQ Relevance

    [UPSC 2021] Explain the purpose of the Green Grid Initiative launched at the World Leader Summit of the COP26 UN Climate change conference in Glasgow in November, 2021. When was this idea first floated in the International Solar Alliance [ISA]?

    Linkage: The Green Grid Initiative advances the ISA goal of cross-border renewable energy integration. The U.S. exit highlights India’s continued leadership in sustaining climate multilateralism.

  • Cybercrime and a global governance crisis

    Why in the news?

    The UN adopted the Convention against Cybercrime (December 2024), the first global cybercrime treaty in over two decades. However, India, the U.S., Japan, and Canada have not signed it, exposing deep divisions in global cyber governance. The Convention highlights a growing principles-practice gap, geopolitical mistrust, and a shift towards polycentric global governance.

    Why is the UN Cybercrime Convention considered a milestone?

    1. Institutional First: Establishes the first UN-led multilateral criminal justice instrument on cybercrime in two decades.
    2. Negotiation Scale: Reflects extensive multilateral engagement involving UN member states, civil society, and private sector actors.
    3. Global Scope: Seeks universal applicability beyond regional instruments like the Budapest Convention.
    4. Symbolic Consensus: Secured General Assembly adoption in December 2024 with support from 72 states.

    How does the Convention expose fractures in global cyber governance?

    1. Non-Participation by Major Democracies: India, the U.S., Japan, and Canada declined to sign, signalling legitimacy concerns.
    2. Governance Divide: Highlights divergence between European cyber norms and alternative governance visions advanced by Russia and China.
    3. Legal Uncertainty: Reveals gaps between international legal principles and domestic implementation capacity.
    4. Polycentrism Risk: Signals movement away from universal frameworks towards fragmented governance centres.

    What are the concerns regarding criminal definitions and civil liberties?

    1. Broad Crime Definitions: Expands criminalisation in ways that allow discretionary interpretation.
    2. Rights Implications: Raises risk of misuse against journalists, activists, and political opponents.
    3. Procedural Safeguards: Anchors protections like judicial review to domestic frameworks rather than uniform standards.
    4. Principles-Practice Rift: Consensus on principles masks divergence in enforcement practices.

    Why does India’s reluctance carry strategic significance?

    1. Institutional Autonomy: India resists surrendering control over data governance and lawmaking.
    2. Negotiation Disengagement: Unlike the Budapest Convention, India did not actively shape the UN Convention’s final contours.
    3. Regulatory Trade-offs: Proposals retained greater state control over citizen data, limiting flexibility.
    4. Eroded Influence: Reflects diminished agenda-setting power in global lawmaking over two decades.

    How does AI governance illustrate implementation challenges?

    1. Watermarking Example: India’s push to watermark AI-generated content highlights regulatory innovation.
    2. Platform Mandates: Draft rules require social media platforms to label AI content beyond body-corporate thresholds.
    3. Prescriptive Risk: Over-specification may constrain innovation and compliance feasibility.
    4. Governance Gap: Demonstrates difficulty in operationalising agreed principles.

    What does the Convention reveal about the global order?

    1. Weakened Multilateralism: Declining U.S. financial support to the UN undermines institutional effectiveness.
    2. Security Council Paralysis: Inability to act decisively in Ukraine and Gaza reflects governance fatigue.
    3. WTO Breakdown: Dispute settlement mechanism non-functional since 2019.
    4. Shift to Minilaterals: Reliance on smaller groupings such as Quad and Five Eyes for functional coordination.

    Why is cybercrime governance central to future global cooperation?

    1. Cross-Border Data Flows: Cybercrime enforcement depends on interoperable data-sharing mechanisms.
    2. Trust Deficit: Near-universal recognition of trusted data corridors without operational consensus.
    3. Capacity Constraints: States lack technical and regulatory infrastructure for implementation.
    4. Autonomy Trade-off: Global cooperation increasingly challenges domestic sovereignty.

    Conclusion

    The UN Convention against Cybercrime underscores the limits of consensus-based global governance in a fragmented geopolitical environment. While it symbolises multilateral intent, its effectiveness will depend on bridging institutional capacity gaps, reconciling sovereignty concerns, and aligning legal principles with enforceable safeguards. The future of cyber governance will be shaped less by universal treaties and more by adaptive, trust-based cooperation frameworks.

    Convention against Cybercrime

    1. The UN General Assembly adopted the Convention against Cybercrime in December 2024, marking the first legally binding UN instrument to combat cybercrime through international cooperation. 
    2. Designed to address issues like ransomware, child sexual abuse material, and online scams, it allows for cross-border evidence sharing and capacity building.
    3. The treaty, which opened for signature in 2025, requires 40 ratifications to enter into force. The treaty is scheduled to remain open for signature until December 31, 2026, and will come into effect 90 days after the 40th nation ratifies it.
    4. Adoption & Scope: The treaty was finalized in 2024 to create a global framework for investigating and prosecuting digital crimes, offering a universal approach rather than just regional (like the Budapest Convention).
    5. Controversies: The treaty has faced criticism regarding:
      1. potential misuse of surveillance powers 
      2. insufficient human rights safeguards
      3. could be used by governments to suppress online freedom.

    PYQ Relevance

    [UPSC 2024] Terrorism has become a significant threat to global peace and security. Evaluate the effectiveness of the United Nations Security Council’s Counter-Terrorism Committee (CTC).

    Linkage: It is highly important for GS-II (UN, global governance) and GS-III (cyber security, internal security) due to rising non-traditional security challenges. Just as UPSC asked about the UN Security Council’s Counter-Terrorism Committee (CTC), it can similarly ask about the UN Convention against Cybercrime, since both deal with transnational security threats and weak UN enforcement mechanisms.

  • SAARG Committee for NPS Investment Framework

    Why in the News?

    The Pension Fund Regulatory and Development Authority has constituted a Committee of Investment Experts for Strategic Asset Allocation and Risk Governance (SAARG) to review and modernise the National Pension System investment framework.

    What is SAARG?

    • A high level expert committee constituted by PFRDA
    • Mandate: Review, recommend and strengthen the investment architecture of NPS
    • Objective: Support long term retirement wealth creation, diversification, risk management and subscriber choice
    • Tenure: The Committee to submit its report within 9 months to PFRDA

    Core Objectives of SAARG

    • Strengthen NPS investment framework in line with
      • Global pension best practices
      • Indian investment ecosystem
    • Improve Portfolio diversification, Risk governance, Liquidity management and Subscriber outcomes

    Significance

    • Enhances resilience and credibility of NPS
    • Aligns pension investments with
      • Long term demographic needs
      • Global best practices
    • Supports retirement security for a growing subscriber base

    Prelims Pointers

    • SAARG is an expert committee, not a statutory body
    • NPS is regulated by PFRDA, not RBI or SEBI
    • Focus on strategic asset allocation and risk governance
    • Sustainability and climate risk integration included in pension investments
    [2017] Who among the following can join the National Pension System (NPS)? 

    (a) Resident Indian citizens only 

    (b) Persons of age from 21 to 55 only 

    (c) All State Government employees joining the services after the date of notification by the respective State Governments 

    (d) All Central Governments Employees including those of Armed Forces joining the services on or after 1st April, 2004

  • [24th January 2026] The Hindu OpED: India and the EU- a fit partnership in a divided world

    PYQ Relevance

    [UPSC 2021] “The foreign policy of India has changed from ‘non-alignment’ to ‘multi-alignment’ in recent times.”Examine.

    Linkage: India’s deepening engagement with diverse partners such as the EU alongside the U.S., Russia, and groupings like QUAD reflects a shift from ideological non-alignment to pragmatic multi-alignment driven by strategic autonomy.

    Mentor’s Comment

    As global alliances weaken due to geopolitical tensions, the India–European Union relationship is reaching a crucial turning point. With the highest EU leadership visiting India for the first time together, the partnership is being repositioned from episodic engagement to strategic alignment. This article analyses why the moment is consequential, what is at stake in trade, defence, and climate negotiations, and how the India-EU partnership could shape a new template for strategic autonomy in a polarised world.

    Why in the News

    The President of the European Commission and the President of the European Council are jointly visiting India for India’s 77th Republic Day and co-chairing the 16th India-EU Summit. The opportunity is large, as talks on a long-pending Free Trade Agreement, defence cooperation, and climate-related trade rules are reaching a critical stage.

    Why has the India-EU partnership gained urgency now?

    1. Geopolitical fragmentation: Undermines reliability of traditional alliances and compels diversification of strategic partnerships.
    2. U.S. unpredictability: Creates uncertainty for both India and Europe amid tariff pressures and transactional diplomacy.
    3. China’s assertiveness: Forces recalibration of economic and security dependencies across Eurasia.
    4. Strategic autonomy: Aligns India’s non-aligned pragmatism with Europe’s reassessment of over-dependence on major powers.

    What makes this engagement different from earlier India-EU summits?

    1. Leadership convergence: Joint presence of EU’s top executive and political leadership signals institutional commitment.
    2. Summit co-chairing: Reflects intent to move beyond symbolism towards outcome-driven engagement.
    3. Timing: Coincides with stalled global governance mechanisms and weakened multilateral trust.
    4. Intent alignment: Demonstrates mutual recognition that episodic engagement is no longer sufficient.

    What is at stake in the India-EU Free Trade Agreement (FTA)?

    1. Negotiation maturity: Talks in final stages after repeated stalling since 2007.
    2. Textiles and apparel: Enables tariff reductions to boost India’s exports to Europe.
    3. Pharmaceuticals and chemicals: Leverages India’s competitive manufacturing advantage.
    4. Automobiles and machinery: Expands European access to India’s growing market.
    5. IT and digital services: Facilitates gains through regulatory harmonisation for India’s IT sector.
    6. Economic insurance: Acts as a hedge against trade disruptions and geopolitical shocks.

    How does climate policy complicate trade cooperation?

    1. Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM): Imposes effective 20-35% carbon charges on Indian exports such as steel, aluminium, cement, and fertilisers.
    2. Non-tariff barrier risk: Erodes potential gains from the FTA if left unaddressed.
    3. Climate equity: Raises concerns over fairness for developing economies with lower historical emissions.
    4. Policy balance: Requires Europe to provide transitional relief while retaining climate ambition.

    Why is defence cooperation emerging as a critical pillar?

    1. Security and Defence Partnership: Proposed by EU leadership to expand strategic engagement.
    2. Market access: Opens European defence markets to Indian manufacturers.
    3. Co-production: Aligns with India’s ‘Make in India’ initiative for defence manufacturing.
    4. Technology transfer: Enhances India’s access to advanced European defence technologies.
    5. Maritime coordination: Supports joint exercises and cooperation in the Indian Ocean.

    How does this partnership offer a model for global order?

    1. Respect for sovereignty: Rejects dominance by Beijing, Moscow, or Washington over strategic choices.
    2. Strategic autonomy: Emphasises flexibility and reduced over-dependence on single partners.
    3. Domestic sensitivities: Balances global cooperation with internal political realities.
    4. Multilateral renewal: Positions India and the EU to shape credible alternatives in global governance.

    Conclusion

    The India-EU partnership is at a critical juncture. Shared concerns over global instability and strategic dependence have created momentum for deeper cooperation. Sustaining progress on trade, climate, and defence could turn intent into outcomes; failure would repeat past stagnation.

  • The antibiotic pipeline is running dangerously dry

    Why in the News?

    Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) has become a serious global public health threat as the development of new antibiotics has not kept pace with the rapid rise in drug resistance. Unlike earlier decades, when ineffective antibiotics were regularly replaced by new ones, no truly new antibiotic classes have emerged in recent years. India is among the worst affected, with very high antibiotic use and an estimated 2.74 lakh deaths linked to AMR in 2019.

    Why is antimicrobial resistance a growing public health crisis?

    1. Rising mortality burden: AMR-attributable deaths in India were estimated at 2.74 lakh in 2019, reflecting a large and growing health burden.
    2. Treatment failure: Common infections are increasingly difficult to treat, increasing complications, hospital stays, and mortality.
    3. Systemic impact: AMR undermines surgery, chemotherapy, organ transplants, and neonatal care by increasing infection risk.
    4. Global spread: Resistant pathogens spread rapidly through travel, trade, food chains, and the environment.

    Why is India disproportionately affected by AMR?

    1. High infectious disease load: India continues to face a high burden of communicable diseases requiring antibiotic use.
    2. Extensive antibiotic consumption: India is among the world’s largest consumers of antibiotics, both in human and animal health.
    3. Healthcare pressures: Overcrowded hospitals and limited diagnostic capacity encourage empirical and broad-spectrum antibiotic use.
    4. Survival advantage of pathogens: Drug-resistant bacteria survive treatment and transmit resistance genes to other bacteria.

    How does antibiotic misuse accelerate resistance?

    1. Inappropriate prescribing: Antibiotics are frequently used for viral infections such as colds, coughs, and diarrhoea.
    2. Empirical treatment: Lack of timely diagnostics leads to blind antibiotic use without pathogen identification.
    3. Prophylactic use: Antibiotics are prescribed preventively, even where clinical benefit is uncertain.
    4. Seasonal misuse: Antibiotics are used for seasonal viral illnesses due to patient demand and prescribing habits.

    What is happening to the global antibiotic pipeline?

    1. Limited innovation: Very few new antibiotic classes have been developed in the past three decades.
    2. R&D stagnation: Most recent approvals involve modifications of existing drugs rather than new mechanisms of action.
    3. Commercial disincentives: Antibiotics offer low returns compared to chronic disease drugs, discouraging private investment.
    4. Effectiveness erosion: Even newly introduced antibiotics lose effectiveness rapidly due to resistance.

    Why is antibiotic stewardship more effective than blanket bans?

    1. Behavioural regulation: Stewardship programs guide rational prescribing rather than eliminating access.
    2. Evidence from India: The Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) launched a national antibiotic stewardship programme in 2015.
    3. Measured impact: Prescription awareness improved, but full behavioural internalisation remains limited.
    4. Sustainability challenge: Stewardship requires continuous monitoring, training, and institutional commitment.

    How do livestock and agriculture worsen the AMR problem?

    1. Non-therapeutic use: Antibiotics are used in animals for growth promotion and disease prevention.
    2. Shared drug classes: Many antibiotics critical for humans are also used in animals.
    3. Environmental spread: Antibiotic residues enter soil and water through animal waste and food chains.
    4. Resistance transfer: Resistance genes move between human, animal, and environmental bacteria.

    Why is data collection on AMR inadequate?

    1. Limited surveillance: ICMR’s AMR surveillance network covers only 25 tertiary hospitals.
    2. Urban bias: Most data originates from large hospitals, missing community-level resistance patterns.
    3. Underestimation risk: Resistance prevalence is likely higher than reported due to incomplete coverage.
    4. Policy constraint: Inadequate data limits targeted interventions and resource allocation.

    Why can’t new antibiotics alone solve AMR?

    1. Rapid resistance development: Resistance emerges even against newly introduced drugs.
    2. Finite effectiveness window: Antibiotics lose usefulness within a few years of widespread use.
    3. Overreliance risk: Dependence on drug discovery ignores behavioural and systemic drivers.
    4. Adjunct necessity: Stewardship, infection prevention, and diagnostics remain central.

    Conclusion

    The antibiotic pipeline crisis reflects a structural mismatch between rising resistance and declining innovation. India’s experience demonstrates that stewardship, surveillance, and behavioural regulation are as critical as drug discovery. Without systemic correction, modern medicine risks returning to a pre-antibiotic era.

    PYQ Relevance

    [UPSC 2024] Can overuse and free availability of antibiotics without Doctor’s prescription, be contributors to the emergence of drug-resistant diseases in India? What are the available mechanisms for monitoring and control? Critically discuss the various issues involved.

    Linkage: This question directly maps to GS Paper III (Science & Technology-Public Health), aligning with UPSC’s repeated focus on antimicrobial resistance as a governance and regulatory challenge. It links with PYQs on antibiotic overuse, emerging health challenges, and technology-policy gaps, reflecting UPSC’s trend of testing systemic failures rather than medical details.

  • Delimitataion after 2027, redrawing power in India

    Why in the News?

    India is approaching its first inter-State Lok Sabha seat redistribution since 1976, following the end of the constitutional freeze after Census 2027. Representation is still based on the 1971 population despite India crossing 1.47 billion, creating a major imbalance. Uneven population growth could allow Uttar Pradesh and Bihar to hold over 25% of Lok Sabha seats, reshaping coalition politics and federal balance.

    What is Delimitation?

    1. It is a constitutional requirement following every Census to ensure equality of representation under Article 82. 
    2. However, India suspended inter-State redistribution of Lok Sabha seats for nearly half a century to avoid penalising States that implemented population control. 
    3. This freeze, reaffirmed by the 84th Constitutional Amendment (2001), effectively ends after Census 2027.
    4. The upcoming exercise will simultaneously reallocate seats, redraw all constituencies, and operationalise 33% women’s reservation, making it a structural reset of India’s representative system.

    Why is delimitation after 2027 fundamentally different from earlier exercises?

    1. Frozen Representation: Maintains 1971 population ratios despite a tripling of population, undermining equal suffrage.
    2. First Inter-State Redistribution Since 1976: Previous exercises only redrew internal boundaries without reallocating seats.
    3. Expanded Mandate: Includes full constituency redraw, inter-State seat reallocation, and women’s reservation implementation.
    4. Time Compression: Census data likely released in 2028; completion before 2031-32 is administratively improbable.

    How have demographic divergences created a representation paradox?

    1. Fertility Divergence: Southern and western States achieved below-replacement fertility through education and health investments.Governance Penalty: States that controlled population risk losing relative political influence.
    2. Population Arithmetic: If seats are allocated purely by population in an expanded House of ~888 members:
      1. Uttar Pradesh: 80 to 151 seats
      2. Bihar: 40 to 82 seats
      3. Combined Share: ~26% of Lok Sabha
      4. Tamil Nadu: 39 to 53 seats; share declines from 7.2% to ~6%
      5. Kerala: 20 to 23 seats; share declines from 3.7% to ~2.6%

    Why does expanding the Lok Sabha not resolve southern States’ concerns?

    1. Absolute vs Relative Power: Parliamentary influence depends on proportion, not absolute numbers.
    2. Coalition Arithmetic: Two States exceeding one-fourth of seats alters government formation dynamics.
    3. Diminished Bargaining Power: Smaller and demographically stable States lose leverage despite formal seat retention.
    4. Moral Paradox: Rewards demographic growth over governance outcomes.

    How to manage redistribution risks?

    1. Extended Freeze: Delays redistribution beyond 2026 to allow fertility convergence; risks Article 14 challenges due to unequal suffrage.
    2. House Expansion: Raises Lok Sabha size to 750-888 seats; mitigates seat loss but not proportional imbalance.
    3. Weighted Formula: Assigns 80% weight to population and 20% to governance indicators (literacy, health, fertility control), analogous to Finance Commission devolution.
    4. Rajya Sabha Rebalancing: Strengthens federal moderation through domicile restoration and restructured State tiers.
    5. State Reorganisation: Proposes dividing Uttar Pradesh into 3-4 States (~38 seats each) to neutralise excessive dominance.
    6. Phased Redistribution: Implements seat reallocation over two election cycles (2034 and 2039) to reduce political shock.

    Why does procedure matter as much as formula in delimitation?

    1. Institutional Design: Requires experts in demography, constitutional law, and federal studies.
    2. State Participation: Meaningful State representation critical for legitimacy.
    3. Transparency: Public hearings and disclosure essential to prevent distrust.
    4. Reservation Sensitivity: SC/ST constituency placement involves Commission discretion and potential manipulation risks.

    How could delimitation reshape India’s federal and political landscape?

    1. Coalition Reconfiguration: Alters role of regional parties in government formation.
    2. Federal Trust Deficit: Perceived injustice risks deepening Centre-State tensions.
    3. Electoral Geography Reset: Administrative convenience, geography, and social composition gain renewed relevance.
    4. Democratic Renewal or Erosion: Outcomes depend on whether equity and transparency guide the process.

    Conclusion

    Delimitation after Census 2027 is not merely a technical exercise but a constitutional moment that will redefine representation, federal balance, and democratic fairness. Its legitimacy will depend on whether the process balances population equality with federal equity, ensuring that States are not politically disadvantaged for achieving governance and demographic stability.

    PYQ Relevance

    [UPSC 2024] What changes has the Union Government recently introduced in the domain of Centre-State relations? Suggest measures to build trust between the Centre and the States and for strengthening federalism.

    Linkage: Post-2027 delimitation may alter Centre-State relations by shifting political power among States based on population growth. Trust can be strengthened through a transparent, phased process that protects federal balance and rewards responsible governance.