💥Join UPSC 2027,2028 Mentorship (August Batch) + XFactor Notes & Microthemes PDF

GS Paper: GS3

  • Parliament passes Carriage of Goods by Sea Bill, 2025

    Why in the News?

    Parliament has passed the Carriage of Goods by Sea Bill, 2025, replacing the nearly century-old Indian Carriage of Goods by Sea Act, 1925.

    About Carriage of Goods by Sea Bill, 2025:

    • Replaces: The colonial-era Indian Carriage of Goods by Sea Act, 1925.
    • Purpose: Regulates the rights, duties, liabilities, and immunities of parties involved in shipping goods by sea from Indian ports to domestic or international destinations.
    • International Alignment: Retains consistency with the Hague Rules (1924), which also formed the basis of the 1925 Act.
    • Objective: Modernises maritime law in line with global standards and boosts India’s ease of doing business in the maritime sector.

    Key Features:

    • Bills of Lading Defined: It outlines the details of the shipment, including the type and quantity of goods, the origin and destination, and the terms of the agreement between the shipper and the carrier.
      • Includes details on goods’ type, quantity, condition, and destination.
      • Serves as a legally binding contract between the shipper and carrier.
    • Central Government Powers:
      • May issue directions for implementation.
      • Can amend the Schedule of Rules related to bills of lading.
    • Part of Broader Maritime Reforms:
      • Supports port development and coastal trade.
      • Encourages creation of State Maritime Boards and a Maritime State Development Council.
      • Covers port safety, disaster response, pollution control, and dispute resolution.
    • Global Compliance: Aligns India’s shipping laws with evolving international conventions and practices.
    [UPSC 2016] The term ‘import cover’, sometimes seen in the news, refers to

    (a) It is the ratio of value of imports to the Gross Domestic Product of a country

    (b) It is the total value of imports of a country in a year

    (c) It is the ratio between the value of exports and that of imports between two countries

    (d) It is the number of months of imports that could be paid for by a country’s international reserves*

     

  • India needs a ‘defence cess’ to fund military modernisation

    With such a levy on high-end goods, spending on luxury will become a visible public act of support for the armed forces. In an era of evolving warfare, from stealth jets to AI-driven drones, India’s defence preparedness is no longer optional, it is existential. This article proposes a ‘Defence Cess’ on luxury goods and services, offering a creative, emotionally resonant, and fiscally sustainable mechanism to ring-fence funds for military modernisation. This issue links directly to GS Paper II (Governance), GS Paper III (Security and Economy), and GS IV (Ethics, especially public accountability and duty).

    The Strategic Urgency: Why Modernisation Can’t Wait

    India is increasingly surrounded by hostile neighbours with fast-upgrading military capacities:

    1. Pakistan may soon induct stealth fighters like J-20 or J-35 from China.
    2. China is testing sixth-generation aircraft and has strong cyber and drone warfare capabilities.
    3. The Indian Air Force (IAF), by contrast, operates only 32 squadrons vs the sanctioned strength of 42 — leaving India strategically exposed in contested airspace.

    Key Quote: “Capability alone is not enough. The country cannot afford to be vulnerable.”

    Modernisation is Existential, Not Aspirational

    India’s military modernisation roadmap is ambitious but underfunded. It includes:

    1. Fifth-generation fighter aircraft development (AMCA)
    2. Indigenous jet engine programmes
    3. Strategic unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs)
    4. Electronic warfare (EW) and cyber-capacity enhancement

    But while intent exists, execution suffers from fragmented schemes, budgetary limitations, and lack of dedicated long-term funding.

    The Defence Cess Proposal: Key Features

    1. A 5–10% surcharge on ultra-luxury goods and services like High-end cars, Private jets, Imported luxury watches, Premium liquor, etc.
    2. Clearly itemised on invoices as “Raksha Cess”
    3. Funds are non-lapsable, targeted, and traceable
    4. Exclusively for capital expenditure in Procurement, R&D, Infrastructure for defence

    Global Parallels and Precedents

    Defence/Strategic Taxation Model
    Italy Luxury tax on yachts and helicopters during Eurozone crisis
    Sweden Long-standing luxury taxation for social balance
    China Anti-extravagance drive redirected elite consumption toward strategic sectors

    These countries have used fiscal mechanisms not just to fund strategy but to shape public narratives, blending consumption with national responsibility.

    Why a Defence Cess Works for India

    1. Psychological and Symbolic Impact: The idea of contributing directly to the betterment of Indian defence through luxury spending has strong emotional appeal. It creates a moral linkage between indulgence and national duty converting private consumption into public solidarity. Naming it “Raksha Cess” makes it resonate with patriotism and responsibility.
    2. Fiscal Innovation Without Burdening the Masses: India’s direct tax base is relatively narrow, and increasing defence funding through general taxation could hurt the middle class or poor. This cess targets only high-end consumers, ensuring that additional fiscal pressure is placed on those most capable of bearing it. Luxury spending has grown significantly with India’s rising affluent class, this captures a booming sector for national good.
    3. Transparency and Traceability: Since the cess is itemised separately on invoices, it allows greater transparency. It increases trust in government utilisation and may lead to greater tax compliance if people know exactly where their money goes. With digitised billing and GST-era infrastructure, monitoring and reporting mechanisms already exist to track such surcharges.
    4. Dedicated, Ring-Fenced Defence Fund: Current defence allocations are diluted across revenue expenses and pensions. It helps bypass routine bureaucratic delays and ensures directed capital spending. A defence cess would be non-lapsable and strictly for capital expenditure — such as: Acquiring new aircraft, R&D in defence tech and Indigenous manufacturing. This enables long-term strategic planning free from annual budget cycles.
    5. Aligns India With Global Practices: Many countries (Italy, Sweden, China) have used luxury taxation or targeted levies to support strategic sectors or correct fiscal imbalances. India can draw from these models to introduce a fiscally sound and globally validated mechanism.
    6. Boosts the Narrative of Nation-Building: In an era where narratives matter, this proposal encourages voluntary nation-building and elite participation in national security. It sends a message that “those who benefit most from India’s rise should contribute most to its protection.”

    Challenges in Implementing a Defence Cess:

    1. Legal and Fiscal Complexity: Introducing a cess outside the GST framework may face legal and administrative hurdles, requiring amendments or coordination with the GST Council. There may be opposition from States citing federal fiscal concerns
    2. Risk of Misuse or Leakage: Any fund not managed with full transparency and oversight can fall prey to inefficiency or corruption. Strong audit systems and public reporting mechanisms must be built into the cess architecture from the outset.
    3. Need for a Clear Governance Structure: A dedicated body or fund management unit should be created under the Ministry of Defence or PMO, preferably with civil society representation for accountability. Without such a structure, funds may be diverted or underutilised.
    4. Revenue Predictability and Scale: Luxury consumption is inelastic but cyclical, it may dip during economic downturns. The fund should not be over-relied upon for core defence needs; rather, it must act as a complementary booster.
    5. Perception Management and Political Pushback: Some may view this as a populist or performative move, or even as a “sin tax on success”. There must be consistent and transparent communication that this is about contribution, not punishment.
    6. Moral Optics and Class Tensions: Care must be taken to avoid triggering class resentment or elite backlash, especially if the tax seems punitive. Framing it as “a privilege with purpose” is crucial — the messaging has to be inclusive, not divisive.

    Conclusion: From Passive Consumers to Active Nation-Builders

    India’s national security demands not just better weapons, but a sustainable model of public contribution and political imagination. A well-designed defence cess could convert elite indulgence into national insurance, creating a visible alignment between privilege and responsibility.

    Value Addition

    India’s Defence Modernisation: 

    What Has Been Done: What is being planned
    • Tejas Mk-1A production initiated (HAL)
    • Strategic partnerships under DPP-2020 for indigenous manufacturing
    • Agni Prime, INS Vikrant, and SAM systems development
    • Defence exports crossed ₹21,000 crore in 2023-24
    • Emergency procurement powers given to armed forces post-Galwan
    • AMCA (Advanced Medium Combat Aircraft) — 5th Gen fighter
    • Twin-engine deck-based fighter (TEDBF) for Navy
    • India-US Jet Engine Deal (GE-HAL) under iCET
    • India-France agreement for submarine co-development
    • Cyber and AI warfare units under Theatre Command model

    Important Agreements and Collaborations:

    Country Collaboration
    USA iCET, Jet Engine tech transfer (GE -F414)
    France Rafale aircraft, scorpene submarine
    Israel Missile defence (Barak-8)
    Russia S-400 Missile systems, AK-203 Rifles

    Important Defence Policies:

    1. Defence Acquisition Procedure (DAP) 2020: Goal: To streamline the procurement process for the Indian Armed Forces, promoting indigenization and efficiency. Prioritizes “Buy Indian” categories, Enhanced Indigenous Content (IC), Simplification of Trial and Testing Procedures and has Emphasis on Make and Innovation.
    2. Innovations for Defence Excellence (iDEX): Goal: To foster an ecosystem for innovation and technology development in the defence and aerospace sectors, leveraging the potential of startups, MSMEs, academia, and individual innovators. It is managed by Defence Innovation Organization (DIO), a not-for-profit company founded by Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL) & Bharat Electronics Limited (BEL).
    3. DRDO’s 5-Year Roadmap (Vision 2025): Goal: To lead India towards self-reliance in defence technologies and become a global leader in defence research and development.

     

  • Status of Ethanol Blended Petrol (EBP) Programme

    Why in the News?

    India met its 20% ethanol blending (E20) target in petrol by March 2025 — five years early. Talks are now on to raise the blending ratio further in the immediate future.

    About Ethanol Blended Petrol (EBP) Programme:

    • Launched in 2003 by the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas.
    • Objective: Promote use of renewable, domestically produced ethanol in petrol.
    • Nationwide rollout (except A&N and Lakshadweep) since April 2019.
    • Feedstock:
      • 1G Ethanol: From sugarcane molasses, maize, rice.
      • 2G Ethanol: From agricultural residues like rice straw, bamboo, bagasse.
    • Blending Progress:
      • 1.6% in 2013–14
      • 11.8% in 2022–23
      • 20% achieved in March 2025 (E20)
    • Future Plans:
      • Discussions on E27 blending target by 2030.
      • Government exploring flex-fuel vehicles (e.g., E85-capable (dual-fuel) cars).

    India’s Achievements:

    • Environmental Gains: 19.2 million tonnes of CO₂ emissions avoided (2014–2021).
    • Economic Impact: ₹26,000 crore saved in foreign exchange via reduced oil imports.
    • Industrial Growth:
      • Distillery capacity scaled up with interest subvention support.
      • Flex-fuel vehicles showcased by major automakers in 2025.
    • Farmer Benefit: Creates demand for sugarcane and grains, increasing farm income.

    Limitations:

    • Technical Challenges
      • Lower mileage with E20 due to reduced energy content.
      • Older vehicles may face engine compatibility issues.
      • Flex-fuel technology adoption still limited.
    • Economic Concerns
      • No drop in fuel prices despite ethanol savings.
      • Consumer hesitation due to lack of visible benefits.
    • Environmental Trade-offs
      • High land and water use for ethanol crops (especially sugarcane).
      • Food security risks from diverting food crops for fuel.
    • Need for Diversification
      • Majority of ethanol still from sugarcane; limited 2G ethanol usage.
      • Need to promote biomass-based ethanol (wood chips, crop residue).
    [UPSC 2025] Consider the following statements:

    Statement I: Of the two major ethanol producers in the world, i.e., Brazil and the United States of America, the former produces more ethanol than the latter.

    Statement II: Unlike in the United States of America where corn is the principal feedstock for ethanol production, sugarcane is the principal feedstock for ethanol production in Brazil.

    Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?

    (a) Both Statement I and Statement II are correct and Statement II explains Statement I

    (b) Both Statement I and Statement II are correct but Statement II does not explain Statement I

    (c) Statement I is correct but Statement II is not correct

    (d) Statement I is not correct but Statement II is correct *

     

  • Rhisotope Project

    Why in the News?

    In a move to combat rhino poaching, the University of the Witwatersrand in South Africa, supported by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), has launched the Rhisotope Project.

    What is Rhisotope Project? 

    • Launched By: University of the Witwatersrand, South Africa, with support from the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA).
    • Initiation: Concept began in 2021; formally launched in July 2024.
    • Objective: Prevent rhino poaching by making horns traceable and unsuitable for illegal trade.
    • Pilot Site: Waterberg Biosphere Reserve, South Africa.
    • Pilot Implementation: 20 rhinos injected with radioisotopes (exact isotope remains undisclosed) for testing.

    How the Isotope Tagging Works?

    • Isotope Basics: Uses radioactive isotopes that emit detectable radiation as they decay.
    • Injection Method: A small hole is drilled into the horn; a low dose of isotope is inserted safely.
    • Detection Mechanism: Radiation Portal Monitors at ports can detect tagged horns—even inside 40-foot containers, as proven using 3D-printed horn simulations.

     

    Significance:

    • Safety Assurance: No damage to rhinos observed; cytological tests showed no cellular or physiological harm.
    • Impact on Illegal Trade: Horn becomes detectable, unusable, and toxic for illegal human consumption.
    [UPSC 2019] Consider the following statements:

    1. Asiatic lion is naturally found In India only.     2. Double-humped camel is naturally found in India only.     3. One-horned rhinoceros is naturally found in India only.

    Which of the statements given above is / are correct?”

    Options:   (a) 1 only *  (b) 2 only   (c) 1 and 3 only    (d) 1, 2 and 3

     

  • Population Census of Nilgiri Tahrs  

    Why in the News?

    A joint population census conducted by Kerala and Tamil Nadu has revealed the presence of 2,668 Nilgiri tahrs in the Western Ghats.

    Population Census of Nilgiri Tahrs  

    About Nilgiri Tahr (Nilgiritragus hylocrius):

    • Endemism: Found only in the Nilgiri Hills and southern Western Ghats of Tamil Nadu and Kerala, India.
    • Ecological Role: Key grazer in the montane grassland ecosystem, influencing plant growth and grassland regeneration.
    • Habitat:
      • Open montane grasslands interspersed with shola forests (South Western Ghats montane rain forests eco-region).
      • Occurs at elevations between 1,200 to 2,600 metres (3,900 to 8,500 feet).
      • Prefers steep rocky slopes, cliff edges, and grassy plateaus — areas with clear visibility to detect predators.
    • Population: Estimated 3,122 individuals in the wild; Locally extinct in about 14% of its historical habitat.
      • In Kerala (1,365): Eravikulam National Park (ENP) – largest single population (~841 individuals); Anamalai Hills landscape.
      • In Tamil Nadu (1303): Mukurthi National Park; Grass Hills National Park; Kalakkad-Mundanthurai Tiger Reserve (lesser presence)
    • Conservation Status:
      • IUCN Red List: Endangered
      • Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972: Schedule I
    • Cultural Significance:
      • Official state animal of Tamil Nadu.
      • Mentioned in Tamil Sangam literature (~2,000 years ago).
      • Seen in Mesolithic rock art (10,000–4,000 BC), indicating its deep historical importance.
    [UPSC 2018] Consider the following fauna of India:

    1. Gharial 2. Leatherback turtle 3. Swamp deer

    Which of the above is/are endangered?

    Options: (a) 1 and 2 only (b) 3 only (c) 1, 2 and 3 * (d) None

     

  • Asset Under Management (AUM)

    Why in the News?

    India’s Mutual Fund (MF) industry has witnessed exponential growth, with Assets Under Management (AUM) reaching ₹74.40 lakh crore as of June 2025, a sevenfold increase over the past decade.

    What are Assets Under Management (AUM)?

    • Definition: AUM refers to the total market value of financial assets (stocks, bonds, etc.) managed by an investment firm on behalf of clients.
    • Growth Drivers:
      • Net investor inflows and redemptions
      • Market performance
      • Dividend reinvestments
    • Importance:
      • Indicates fund size, investor confidence, and fund stability
      • Reflects fund manager performance and popularity
      • Higher AUM allows better liquidity and portfolio diversification
      • Impacts management fees and minimum investment limits

    What is a Mutual Fund?

    • Definition: A mutual fund pools money from multiple investors to invest in a diversified portfolio.
    • Management: Handled by professional fund managers to balance risk and return.
    • Unit-Based Investment: Investors purchase fund units; each unit’s value is called the Net Asset Value (NAV), which changes with market movement.

    Classification of Mutual Funds

    a. Based on Asset Class:

    1. Equity Funds: Invest in stocks; includes large-cap, mid-cap, and small-cap funds.
    2. Debt Funds: Invest in bonds and other fixed-income instruments.
    3. Hybrid Funds: Mix of equity and debt for balanced risk-return.

    b. Based on Investment Objective:

    1. Growth Funds: Focus on capital appreciation; suitable for long-term investors.
    2. Income Funds: Aim for regular income via bonds/dividends.
    3. Liquid Funds: Invest in short-term debt; low risk and high liquidity.
    4. Tax-saving Funds (Equity Linked Savings Scheme): Offer Section 80C tax benefits; equity-focused.
    5. Pension Funds: Meant for retirement; long-term return-focused.

    c. Based on Structure:

    1. Open-ended Funds: Investors can enter or exit anytime; highly liquid.
    2. Closed-ended Funds: Fixed maturity; investments only during the initial offer period.
    3. Interval Funds: Allow purchase/redemption only at specific intervals.

     

    [UPSC 2025] Consider the following statements:

    I. India accounts for a very large portion of all equity option contracts traded globally, thus exhibiting a great boom. II. India’s stock market has grown rapidly in the recent past, even overtaking Hong Kong’s at some point in time. III. There is no regulatory body either to warn small investors about the risks of options trading or to act on unregistered financial advisors in this regard.

    Which of the statements given above are correct?

    Options:  (a) I and II only * (b) II and III only (c) I and III only (d) I, II and III

     

  • How India’s Pesticide Market is Changing

    The Growth is Now Coming Not from Insecticides or Fungicides, but Herbicides.

    Understanding the Three Major Types of Pesticides:

    Pesticides are chemical or biological substances used to protect crops by eliminating or controlling pests, diseases, or weeds. India’s pesticide market primarily consists of:

    • Insecticides: These control insects that damage crops by feeding on them or transmitting diseases.
    • Fungicides: These are used to prevent or eliminate fungal infections like mildew, blight, or rust that affect crop yield and quality.
    • Herbicides: These destroy or inhibit the growth of weeds that compete with crops for nutrients, water, and sunlight.

    Herbicides – The New Growth Driver of India’s Pesticide Market:

    India’s organised crop protection market is valued at approximately ₹24,500 crore. While insecticides (₹10,700 crore) remain the largest segment, herbicides (₹8,200 crore) have emerged as the fastest-growing category, with an annual growth rate exceeding 10%. This shift reflects a deeper transformation in India’s rural economy—one driven by labour scarcity, rising wage rates, and the need for mechanisation and efficiency in farm operations.

    Why Herbicides Are Gaining Ground:

    1. Labour Shortages in Agriculture: Manual weeding is time-consuming and labour-intensive. A labourer takes 8–10 hours to weed one acre, and the average daily wage has increased from ₹326 in 2019 to over ₹447 in 2024. Moreover, rural youth are increasingly moving away from agricultural work. This has led to a surge in herbicide use as a labour-saving input, similar to how tractors reduced the need for manual ploughing.
    2. Time-Saving and Cost-Effective: Power weeders are limited in closely spaced or deep-rooted crops. Herbicides, on the other hand, can be sprayed easily and reduce both labour dependence and turnaround time between cropping cycles.
    3. Strategic Use Patterns Emerging: Earlier, herbicides were used only after weed emergence (“post-emergent”). Now, farmers increasingly apply “pre-emergent” herbicides at or just after sowing to prevent weed growth from the beginning—reflecting a shift from reactive to preventive agriculture.

    Role of Indian Companies Amidst MNC Dominance:

    India’s crop protection sector remains largely dominated by multinationals like Bayer (Germany), Syngenta (Switzerland), Corteva (USA), and Sumitomo (Japan). However, Indian companies like Crystal Crop Protection Ltd (CCPL) and Dhanuka Agritech are rising players:

    1. CCPL acquired rights for key herbicides like Ethoxysulfuron and Gramoxone from global majors.
    2. It has also developed new products like ‘Sikosa’ in partnership with Battelle (USA) and Mitsui (Japan), showing how Indian firms are strategically expanding through innovation and collaboration.

    Why This Matters for India’s Agricultural Future

    1. Productivity Gains: Weeds reduce crop yield by competing for water and nutrients. Herbicides help ensure better resource absorption by crops.
    2. Supports Mechanisation: Like other farm machinery, herbicides reduce dependence on human labour and enable faster, scalable farming.
    3. Aligns with Climate-Resilient Agriculture: Timely and smart weed control reduces input waste and improves crop resilience.

    Key Concerns

    1. Ecological Impact: Excessive herbicide use can lead to soil degradation, water contamination, and loss of biodiversity.
    2. Labour Displacement: As weeding becomes chemical-driven, demand for rural manual labour might further decline.
    3. MNC Monopoly: Unlike seeds and fertilisers, pesticides remain MNC-dominated, raising questions on strategic autonomy in agri-inputs.

    Conclusion:

    The rise of herbicides in India’s pesticide market marks a significant transformation in agricultural input use. While they offer a timely solution to labour shortages and boost farm efficiency, a cautious, balanced, and indigenously empowered approach is necessary.

  • [pib] India Electric Mobility Index (IEMI)

    Why in the News?

    To support India’s net-zero transport goal by 2070, NITI Aayog launched the India Electric Mobility Index (IEMI) to track and rank States/UTs on their shift to electric mobility.

    [pib] India Electric Mobility Index (IEMI)

    About India Electric Mobility Index (IEMI):

    • Launched by: NITI Aayog in 2024.
    • Purpose: To evaluate and benchmark the progress of Indian States and Union Territories (UTs) in achieving their electric mobility and transport decarbonization goals.
    • Scoring: States and UTs are scored out of 100 using 16 indicators grouped under 3 core themes.
    • Core Themes:
      1. Transport Electrification Progress – Measures EV adoption across segments (2W, 3W, 4W, buses, etc.)
      2. Charging Infrastructure Readiness – Assesses public charging station density, coverage, and policy support.
      3. EV Research & Innovation Status – Tracks EV startups, R&D activity, patents, and skilling efforts.
    • Significance:
      • Supports tailored policymaking and cross-learning.
      • Enables transparency and healthy competition among states.
      • Aligns with India’s net-zero emissions target by 2070.
    • Methodology: Based on VAHAN data, charging infrastructure maps, and stakeholder consultations.
    • Accessibility: Publicly available dashboard and report for rankings, scores, and methodology.

    Key Highlights (2024 Edition):

    • Top Performers: Delhi, Maharashtra, and Chandigarh lead overall in EV readiness.
    • Category Leaders:
      • Transport Electrification: Delhi and Maharashtra.
      • Charging Infrastructure: Karnataka, Haryana, Himachal Pradesh, Ladakh.
      • Research & Innovation: Delhi, Tamil Nadu, Maharashtra, Karnataka, Telangana, Haryana.
    • EV Policy Status: 29 States/UTs have formal EV policies; 4 are in the draft stage.
    • EV Adoption Data:
      • EVs make up 5.3% of private vehicle sales in 2024.
      • Over 12 lakh EVs registered in India during the year.
    • Public Charging Network: India has over 25,000 public EV charging stations.
    • State Categories:
      • Performers: Karnataka, Tamil Nadu, Uttar Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Odisha, Haryana, Goa.
      • Aspirants: Punjab, Rajasthan, Telangana, Andhra Pradesh, Assam, Bihar, Kerala, North-East states.
    [UPSC 2024] Which one of the following is the exhaust pipe emission from Fuel Cell Electric Vehicles powered by hydrogen?

    Options: (a) Hydrogen peroxide (b) Hydronium (c) Oxygen (d) Water vapour*

     

  • Sawalkote Hydro Project

    Why in the News?

    After suspending the Indus Waters Treaty, India is asserting water control in J&K by reviving the Sawalkote Hydroelectric Project — the UT’s largest planned hydro project.

    Sawalkote Hydro Project

    About Sawalkote Hydro Project:

    • Location: Ramban and Udhampur districts, Jammu and Kashmir.
    • River: Built on the Chenab River (a western river under the Indus Waters Treaty).
    • Agency: Implemented by National Hydroelectric Power Corporation.
    • History: Proposed in the 1960s; delayed due to Pakistan’s objections, environmental issues, and red tape. Revived after India suspended the Indus Waters Treaty post the April 2025 Pahalgam terror attack.
    • Status (2025): Forest clearance granted; tenders floated on 29 July 2025; declared a project of national importance.
    • Timeline: 96 months post-clearance; expected commissioning by or after 2032.

    Key Features:

    • Type: Run-of-the-river (utilizes the natural flow and elevation drop of a river) hydroelectric project.
    • Capacity: 1,856 Megawatts (8 × 225 MW + 1 × 56 MW).
    • Dam: 192.5 m high, roller-compacted concrete gravity dam; reservoir holds 550 million cubic meters.
    • Powerhouse: Underground, with Francis turbines.
    • Cost: ₹22,704.8 crore (~2.6 billion United States Dollars).
    [UPSC 2009] Gandhi Sagar Dam is a part of which one of the following?

    Options: (a) Chambal Project * (b) Kosi Project (c) Damodar Valley Project (d) Bhakra Nangal Project

     

  • Pollution Control can levy Environmental Damages: SC

    Why in the News?

    In a landmark ruling, the Supreme Court has empowered Pollution Control Boards (PCBs) across India with the authority to impose and collect restitutionary and compensatory damages under the Water and Air Acts.

    Key Highlights of Supreme Court Ruling:

    • Key Powers Granted:
      • Impose and collect restitutionary and compensatory damages.
      • Demand bank guarantees in anticipation of environmental harm.
    • Legal Basis:
      • Section 33A, Water Act, 1974: Power to issue directions for closure/regulation of industries and stoppage of utilities to enforce water pollution norms.
      • Section 31A, Air Act, 1981: Similar binding powers to control air pollution; non-compliance is a legal violation.

    About Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB):

    • Established: September 1974 under the Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974; Also empowered under Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981.
    • Role: Statutory technical body to promote clean air and water; provides services under the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986.
    • Key Functions:
      • Control and abate water and air pollution; promote stream and well cleanliness.
      • Advise the Central Government on pollution-related issues.
      • Coordinate with and assist State Pollution Control Boards (SPCBs); resolve disputes.
      • Monitor pollution in Union Territories via delegated powers under Water, Air, and Water Cess Acts.
    • Develops and revises:
      • National Ambient Air Quality Standards.
      • Water Quality Criteria from various sources.
      • Emission/Discharge Standards under Environment Protection Rules, 1986.
      • Bio-Medical Waste Incineration Norms.
      • Noise/Emission Limits for diesel, LPG, and CNG generators.
    • Minimal National Standards (MINAS) Issuance:
      • Covers effluent, emission, noise, and solid waste across industries.
      • Mandatory for State adoption as baseline standards.
      • Publishes COINDS (Comprehensive Industry Documents), manuals, and codes for pollution treatment and control systems.

    About State Pollution Control Boards (SPCBs):

    • Constitution: Formed by State Governments under the Water and Air Acts.
    • Functions:
      • Monitor and control local pollution.
      • Inspect industries and enforce compliance.
      • Advise state governments.
      • Conduct awareness campaigns.
      • Implement control programmes and collaborate with CPCB and local bodies.
    [UPSC 2018] How is the National Green Tribunal (NGT) different from the Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB)?

    1. The NGT has been established by an Act whereas the CPCB has been created by an executive order of the Government.

    2. The NGT provides environmental justice and helps reduce the burden of litigation in the higher courts whereas the CPCB promotes cleanliness of streams and wells and aims to improve the quality of air in the country.

    Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

    Options: (a) 1 only (b) 2 only * (c) Both 1 and 2 (d) Neither 1 nor 2