💥UPSC 2026, 2027, 2028 UAP Mentorship (March Batch) + Access XFactor Notes & Microthemes PDF

Wildlife Conservation Efforts

Should Kerala Capture Muttikomban or Promote Coexistence?

Why in the news?

The Kerala Forest Department is attempting to capture the wild elephant Muttikomban in Vadakkanad, Wayanad district, with plans to confine it in a kraal at Muthanga and convert it into a Kumki elephant, triggering scientific, legal and conservation concerns.

Why Is Muttikomban Being Targeted?

Repeated crop damage in farms and plantations
Frequent movement into settlements
Recent death of farmer Rajeev
• Locals suspect Muttikomban responsible

However

No scientific evidence linking elephant to death
No camera trap or forensic confirmation
• No record of previous human killing

What Is a Kraal?

Wooden enclosure used to confine wild elephants
• Used during taming and training process
• Step before conversion into Kumki elephant

What Is a Kumki Elephant?

Trained captive elephant
• Used to control wild elephants
• Used during capture operations
• Used in forest management

Why Are Experts Opposing Capture?

Legal Concerns

Wildlife Protection Act 1972
• Capture allowed only as Last Resort
• Requires Verified Threat Evidence
• Experts say Legal criteria not met

Ethical Concerns

Stress during tranquilisation
Captivity of wild elephant
• Possible Violation of Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act

[2022] With reference to Indian laws about wildlife protection, consider the following statements: 
1 Wild animals are the sole property of the government. 
2 When a wild animal is declared protected, such animal is entitled for equal protection whether it is found in protected areas or outside. 
3 Apprehension of a protected wild animal becoming a danger to human life is sufficient ground for its capture or killing. 
Which of the statements given above is/are correct? 
(a) 1 and 2 (b) 2 only (c) 1 and 3 (d) 3 only

Join the Community

Join us across Social Media platforms.