Search results for: “”

As per OSCE, the Doctrine of Democratic Governance is a system of government where institutions function according to democratic processes and norms, both internally and in their interaction with other institutions.

Importance of public perception of integrity and commitment of civil servants

Integrity:

1. Transparency: Eg- Ashok Khemka, an IAS officer, is known for his transparency, especially during his whistleblowing on land scams in Haryana.
2. Accountability: Integrity ensures accountability, as seen in Kiran Bedi’s tenure as Director General of Tihar Jail, where she introduced reforms that improved conditions and ensured greater transparency.
3. Fairness: Eg- T.N. Seshan, former Chief Election Commissioner, enforced electoral laws with strict impartiality, boosting public confidence in the electoral system.
4. Encouragement of Participation: During COVID-19, IAS Iqbal Singh Chahal with his Dharavi model, engaging communities in awareness campaigns showcased commitment, leading to higher public participation in health measures.

Commitment:

1. Responsiveness: Eg- Durga Shakti Nagpal, an IAS officer, took a strong stand against illegal sand mining in Uttar Pradesh, showcasing her commitment to enforcing the law.
2. Effectiveness and Efficiency: E. Sreedharan, known as the “Metro Man,” exemplified commitment by ensuring the timely and efficient completion of the Delhi Metro project, enhancing public perception of governance.
3. Rule of Law: Sanjukta Parashar, an IPS officer in Assam, is known her active role in combating insurgency.
4. Inclusiveness: Armstrong Pame, an IAS officer in Manipur, built a 100 km road connecting remote villages without government funds
5. Trust Building: Eg. IPS Atul Kulkarni started bharosa cell as grievance redressal platform for women and transgenders.

“Every civil servant of India should help the countrymen in making their dreams come true,”PM Narendra Modi. With this vision,there is a critical need for positive public perception of civil servants to ensure effective democratic governance. 

United Nations defines poverty as “a state in which an individual or group lacks the financial resources to meet their basic needs for a minimum standard of living.” WHO defines malnutrition as “the condition that results from eating a diet in which one or more nutrients are either not enough or too much, causing health problems.

How Poverty and Malnutrition Create a Vicious Cycle:

1. Economic Barriers to Nutrition: Low-income households often lack access to nutritious food due to financial constraints, exacerbating malnutrition. 
2. Impacts of Malnutrition on Poverty: Eg. ASER reports show higher dropout rates and lower literacy levels among malnourished children in India.
3. Healthcare Costs of Malnutrition: Eg. Malnutrition-related diseases increase healthcare expenditure, limiting resources for other essentials like education.
4. High Child Mortality: 68.2% of death of children below five years old are caused by malnutrition.
5. Educational Limitations Due to Cognitive Delays: Eg. The ASER report indicates that malnourished children are more likely to drop out of school.
6. Productivity Loss and Economic Growth: Eg. The World Bank estimates that malnutrition costs between 5% and 11% of GDP in regions like Africa and Asia.
7. Social Exclusion: Malnourished individuals are often socially excluded due to their reduced economic and social contributions, further deepening poverty.
8. Intergenerational Transfer of Poverty: Malnourished parents are less able to provide for their children, who then grow up in poverty, continuing the cycle.

Steps to Break the Cycle:

1. Innovative PDS reforms like distributing e-food coupons similar to e-Rupi as experimented in Assam, home delivery of ration material and PDS reforms in accordance with recommendations of Shanta Kumar Committee will help reduce both poverty and hunger problem.
2. Nutrition Programs: Strengthen schemes like POSHAN Abhiyaan and the Mid-Day Meal Scheme to ensure access to nutritious food, especially for children and pregnant women. Eg. Tamil Nadu has introduced Breakfast in  Mid-Day Meal 
3. Women Empowerment: Eg. Kerala’s Kudumbashree program empowers women, enhancing their role in family health and economic decision-making.
4. Economic Empowerment: Expand livelihood programs like MGNREGA to provide stable incomes, improving access to food and healthcare.
5. Community Nutrition Education: Educating communities on proper nutrition and food safety can help address malnutrition at the grassroots level. Brazil’s Fome Zero (Zero Hunger) program has successfully reduced hunger through community-driven nutrition education.

As Mark Winne states, “We cannot end hunger unless we end poverty.” Thus, Only by sustained efforts can we regain progress towards goals of Zero poverty(SDG-1) and Zero Hunger(SDG -2).

A public charitable trust is a legal entity (established under the Indian Trusts Act of 1882) that serves the public by carrying out charitable activities. They are created to pool resources and assets to achieve philanthropic goals. Eg-  Tata Trusts, Azim Premji Foundation,etc. 

Public Charitable Trusts and Their Role in Inclusive Development in India

1. Poverty Reduction – Eg- Tata Trusts’ Lakhpati Kisan Initiative in Jharkhand aims to create sustainable livelihoods by empowering tribal farmers with improved agricultural practices
2. Educational Enhancement: Eg. scholarships by Dhirubhai Ambani Foundation .
3. Healthcare Accessibility: Eg. telemedicine services by Piramal Swasthya initiative  in Assam have delivered over 5 million consultations.
4. Empowerment Through Skill Development – Eg- The Self-Employed Women’s Association (SEWA) has uplifted over 1.5 million women by providing vocational training and access to financial services.
5. Infrastructure Development – Eg- The Infosys Foundation focuses on building infrastructure such as schools, hospitals, and sanitation facilities in rural areas. 
6. Complementing Government Efforts: Charitable trusts assist in implementing government schemes, such as Swachh Bharat, by providing water, sanitation, and health services in rural areas.
7. Social Inclusion- Eg-  The Aga Khan Rural Support Programme (AKRSP) works in tribal regions of Gujarat, promoting social inclusion through watershed management and livelihoods for marginalized communities.
8. Environmental Sustainability – The Sundarban Social Development Centre in West Bengal works on mangrove restoration and eco-friendly livelihoods, supporting 10,000 families while preserving the environment.
9. Leveraging CSR for Development: Eg- Azim Premji Foundation signed pact with karnataka government to provide eggs in mid day meals.

Issues with public charitable trust in india

1. Misuse of Funds: In 2020, the Pandit Deendayal Upadhyay Smriti Manch faced scrutiny after the Delhi High Court flagged irregularities in fund usage, with donations being misappropriated for non-charitable purposes.
2. Governance Issues: The Tata Trusts were involved in a legal dispute with the Income Tax Department over misuse of tax exemptions.
3. Lack of Accountability: In 2021, the Gandhi Smarak Nidhi Trust faced criticism for lack of transparency and ineffective program implementation, raising concerns about accountability.
4. Impact Measurement Challenges: McKinsey’s India Impact Evaluation Report 2020 revealed that only 12% of public charitable trusts have mechanisms to track long-term social outcomes effectively.
5. Dominant top-down approach: Development programs driven by donors often impose a top-down approach, where external organizations dictate priorities and goals instead of considering local needs and perspectives.
6. External interference: Relying heavily on donor funding diminishes the ability to negotiate and involve communities due to the conditions imposed by donors.
7. Dependency Theory: Dependency theory suggests that international aid, including that provided by donor agencies, can create a cycle of dependency among recipient nations. The aid leads to reliance on foreign funds rather than fostering domestic growth and self-sufficiency.

Way forward

1. Monitoring: There should be better coordination between Ministries of Home Affairs and Finance in terms of monitoring and regulating illicit and unaccounted funds. 
2. Streamlined Registration Process: Simplify and standardize the registration process for charitable trusts across states to reduce bureaucratic hurdles. This can encourage more organizations to formalize their operations.
3. Capacity Building and Training: Provide training programs and resources for trustees and staff of charitable trusts to enhance their governance skills, financial management, and operational efficiency.

“Public charitable trusts and NGOs are crucial pillars of democracy. They fill the gap between government actions and societal needs, ensuring more inclusive development.” – Amartya Sen.

The 73rd and 74th Constitutional Amendments established the framework for Panchayati Raj and urban local bodies, promoting inclusive development and addressing local issues effectively.

Role of local bodies in providing good governance at local level 

1. Decentralisation and Self-Governance: bringing governance closer to citizens and enhancing democratic participation in decision-making affecting daily lives. Eg-  Gram Sabhas 
2. Rule of Law: Local bodies enforce regulations such as building codes, sanitation rules, and land use policies. Eg- municipalities taking action against illegal encroachments.
3. Responsiveness: Local bodies respond quickly to local issues such as waste management. Eg-  the Indore Municipal Corporation swiftly implemented waste segregation policies, earning Indore the title of the cleanest city in India.
4.  Consensus-Oriented: Eg- Village Development Plans (VDPs) involve consultations with local communities to align projects with their needs, promoting consensus.
5. Equity and Inclusiveness: Programs like Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana (PMAY), implemented by local bodies, aim to provide affordable housing to the economically weaker sections, ensuring social equity.
6. Effectiveness and Efficiency: Eg- as per World Bank, decentralisation and local governance through PRIs reduced corruption and leakages in public welfare schemes by about 15-20%.
7. Accountability: Eg- social audits of MGNREGA (Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act).

Challenges

1. Financial – Panchayats in India generate only 1% of their revenue through local taxes. The majority of their income, approximately 95%, comes from grants by the central and state governments.
2. Parastatal Agencies: State-run bodies like urban development authorities and public corporations often take over key functions, limiting the autonomy of local bodies. Eg- Delhi Jal Board
3. Improper Devolution of Functions: Many states have not fully devolved powers to local governments, leaving them with restricted control over important governance functions.
4. Proxy Representation – Corporator pati/Mayor Pati syndrome/ Sarpanch Pati syndrome
5. Lack of Staff:  local bodies face a severe shortage of skilled personnel, hindering their ability to perform assigned functions. As of 2022, about 35% of municipal corporation posts remain unfilled, affecting service delivery and governance.

Pros And Cons Of Merging Rural Local Bodies With Urban Local Bodies 

Way forward

1. Instead of directly merging rural bodies with urban ones, create independent municipal councils in peri-urban areas, improve infrastructure and governance, then merge with larger municipalities.
2. Revitalize gram sabhas and ward committees through inclusive discussions and use of social media to facilitate member communication.

Drawing from Gandhian Swarajya, any merger must ensure local self-governance and empowerment, where both rural and urban needs are addressed without compromising the essence of decentralization.

CAG is a constitutional body under article 148 that ensures Executive accountability in India. It audit the receipts and expenditures of the Central Government, State Governments, and other bodies that receive funding from the Government. B.R Ambedkar called CAG as most important office in Constitution of India.

Role of CAG ensuring legality of expenditure 

1. Article 149: CAG audits all receipts and expenditures of the Union and States to ensure legality. Eg: In the 2G Spectrum Case (2010), CAG found illegal allocation of licenses without proper procedures.
2. Article 266: Funds from the Consolidated Fund can only be withdrawn with legislative approval. Eg: CAG’s audit of Assam’s finances revealed unauthorized withdrawals from the Consolidated Fund.
3. Article 150: The accounts must be kept in a form prescribed by the President on CAG’s advice. Eg: CAG’s audit of Railway finances found non-compliance with the prescribed format.
4. Section 13 of CAG Act, 1971: Authorizes CAG to audit expenditures to ensure they are legally available for the purpose. Eg: CAG’s audit of MGNREGA funds revealed misuse on non-permitted projects.
5. Article 151: CAG submits audit reports to the President/Governor for presentation in Parliament/State Legislature. Eg: CAG’s report on Commonwealth Games highlighted legal breaches in procurement.

CAG ensuring propriety of expenditure 

1. Section 17 of CAG Act, 1971: Allows CAG to audit the efficiency and propriety of transactions.
   Eg: In the Coal Block Allocation audit, CAG questioned the lack of competitive bidding.
2. Regulation 41: CAG can conduct propriety audits to ensure spending is wise and economical. Eg: CAG’s audit of Mid-Day Meal Scheme found excessive infrastructure spending with little impact.
3. Propriety Audit: CAG examines the fairness and wisdom of expenditures. Eg: In the Debt Waiver Scheme audit, CAG found ineligible beneficiaries receiving waivers.
4. Subsidy/Grant Audits: CAG audits the effective use of government subsidies. Eg: In Ujjwala Yojana, CAG found that many beneficiaries could not afford LPG refills.
5. Transparency in Spending: Eg. audits of projects like the Delhi Metro Rail Corporation are published online, allowing citizens to scrutinize how public funds are utilized. 
6. Safeguarding Public Interest by scrutinizing financial management practices within government entities. Eg. CAG’s audits revealed inefficiencies and mismanagement in Air India.

Issues with CAG

1. Though legal and regulatory audits are compulsory, but proprietary audits are discretionary.                         
2. Paul Appleby criticized role of CAG as auditor by saying it has negative and paralyzing effect on administration.
3. Accounts are audited after actual expenditure is made, a mere post-facto audit.

Adopting a British System where CAG is both Comptroller as well as Auditor General can strengthen role of CAG as  one of the bulwarks of the democratic system of government in India.

The cabinet system is a government in which the real executive power rests with a cabinet of ministers who are collectively responsible to the legislature (Article 75). Parliamentary sovereignty refers to the supremacy of the Parliament in the legislative process.

Marginalization Of Parliamentary Supremacy Due To Cabinet System

• No proper separation of power –  results in abuse of power that leads to arbitrariness.
• Decline of Parliamentary Committees –  The percentage of Bills having been referred to the DRSCs is reduced from 60% during 14th LS to 71% and 27%.
• 
• Lesser time spent on scrutiny- Eg- about 69 percent of the Bills introduced in Parliament were passed in the same session during the 17th Lok Sabha. 
• Delegated Legislation: In V.K.Kunjlengam Case, supreme court noted Increasing reliance on delegated legislation means Parliament, reducing its supremacy in law-making.
• Party Discipline: Parliamentary members are often expected to follow party lines, limiting independent legislative debate. Eg- use of Whip
• Frequent ordinances, now 11 per year as compared to 6 per year prior to 2010, bypasses parliament’s role of law making and accountability over executive.In D.C. Wadhwa vs. State of Bihar, the Supreme Court criticized the repetitive use of ordinances. 
• Government Control over Parliamentary Agenda: The legislative agenda is predominantly set by the cabinet with minimal input from minority parties or independent members restricting diverse viewpoints from being represented in legislative processes.

Role of parliament remains significant

1. Ultimate Legislative Authority: All major laws and budgets require approval from Parliament after due deliberation. 
2. Private Member’s Bills and Debates: Eg-  Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Bill
3. Role of Committees: Eg-  Public Accounts Committee (PAC), chaired by the opposition, scrutinized the 2G spectrum case
4. Opposition’s Role in Parliament: Intense debates on policies such as GST illustrate how opposition parties can mobilize public sentiment and challenge government actions effectively.
5. Judicial Oversight: Eg- SC striking down of Section 66A of the IT Act in 2015 (Shreya Singhal case)

Strengthening parliamentary processes is vital for a vibrant Indian democracy. Thus restoring the balance of power between the executive and legislature is essential for effective governance.

Lok Adalats and Arbitration Tribunals are Statutory instruments for alternative dispute resolution that aim to provide speedy and cost-effective resolution of disputes outside of the traditional court system.

Difference Between Lok Adalat And Arbitration Tribunals

Powers In Civil And Criminal Cases 

1. Lok Adalats:
   1. Can entertain civil cases like property disputes, family disputes, land disputes.
   2. Can also take up criminal cases but only compoundable offenses (minor offenses where parties can settle).
2. Arbitration Tribunals:
   1. Only civil cases, typically commercial disputes, can be addressed.
   2. No jurisdiction over criminal matters.

As ‘Justice delayed is justice denied’. Both Lok Adalats and Arbitration Tribunals need to be strengthened to increase accessibility, affordability and quality of Justice in the spirit of Article 39.

One nation-one election principle, which seeks to synchronize Lok Sabha and state assembly elections, aims to decrease the frequency of elections and streamline the electoral process, thereby improving efficiency and reducing costs.

Electoral reforms as suggested by various committees 

1. On  “one nation – one election”

1. Ram Nath Covind Panel –  suggested 15 amendments including insertion of a new Article 82A and Amendment of Article 327.
2. It was supported by Election Commission in 1983 itself. In 1999, the LCI headed by Justice B. P. Jeevan Reddy also advocated for simultaneous elections.
3. In 2018, the Law Commission of India (LCI)– In 2018, it released a draft report on simultaneous elections and recommended three alternatives to synchronise elections in India.
4. Other Reforms

1. Dinesh Goswami Committee (1990): Recommended limits on election expenses, voter IDs, and transparent political funding.
2. Tarkunde Committee (1975): Suggested proportional representation and state funding of elections.
3. Indrajit Gupta Committee (1998): Advocated for state funding of elections.
4. Vohra Committee (1993): Explored criminalization in politics.

Need for electoral reforms and one nation – one election

1. Reduced financial burden: The 2014 Lok Sabha elections cost ₹3,870 crore, while a single state election like Bihar (2015) cost ₹300 crore. ONOE can reduce costs to ₹4,500 crore overall. (ECI).
2. Reduced use of Money Power – as per report by the Centre for Media Studies, the 2024 election is expected to cost approximately Rs 1,00,000 crore (increased from 6 paise per elector in 1951 to Rs 46 in 2014). Simultaneous elections will lower these costs.
3. Less disruption from MCC: Frequent MCC impositions stall development work for months. Fewer elections will limit MCC duration and expedite governance.
4. Improved administrative efficiency: Eg- over 11 million personnel were deployed in the 2019 elections. Simultaneous elections streamline this effort.
5. Fewer populist measures: Governments announce short-term policies like farm loan waivers (e.g., ₹70,000 crore in 2008-09) during elections. Simultaneous polls would encourage long-term policy-making.
6. Improved social harmony: Simultaneous elections reduce the polarization caused by repetitive campaigns. Eg- communal riots before Delhi Elections
7. Increased voter participation – according to the Law Commission, ONOE will increase voter turnout because it will be more easy for people to cast many ballots at once

Challenges Associated With One Nation One Election:

1. Reduced Accountability: As Per Yogendra Yadav ONOE limits voters’ ability to hold governments accountable regularly, as they get fewer opportunities to express discontent with the ruling party’s performance.
2. By-Elections due to the untimely resignation or death of an elected representative will still be necessary, thus continuing some level of electoral process throughout the year.
3. Dilution of Local Issues: According to research by IDFC Institute, if elections are held simultaneously, there’s a 77% likelihood of voters favoring the same political party or alliance for both state assemblies and the Lok Sabha, national issues could overshadow local concerns.
4. Imbalance of Power: A national party dominating the Lok Sabha elections could also sweep the state assembly elections, resulting in a lack of checks and balances on the ruling regime’s powers.
5. Undermining Federalism by concentrating power at the center. States may lose autonomy and face reduced regional representation.
6. Political Instability: In the era of coalition governments, there could be increased instances of horse-trading and disqualifications of MPs or MLAs, leading to political instability.
7. Constitutional and Legal Hurdles: Eg- Ram Nath Covind panel suggested 15 amendments. There may be issues in generating consensus, potentially delaying its implementation
8. Logistical Challenges such as the availability of electronic voting machines, personnel, and other resources.

Way Forward

1. Cluster State Elections: As suggested by Law Commission – two elections in five years or all elections falling due in a calendar year should be conducted together.
2. Coupling the ‘no-confidence motion’ along with the ‘vote of confidence’ in an alternative government. Eg- Constructive vote of no confidence in Germany
3. Building consensus among political parties and states through open dialogues, consultations, and deliberations

However, since the issue is concerned with the federal structure which is part of Basic Structure of the Constitution (S. R. Bommai Judgment), further scrutiny and analysis of one nation one election is the need of the hour.

“India is, the cradle of the human race, birthplace of human speech, mother of history, the grandmother of legend, & great grandmother of tradition.” – Mark Twain. However, this richness often intersects with socio-economic marginalities, disproportionately impacting certain communities.

Cultural Diversity Intersect With Socio-Economic Marginalities Reinforcing Inequality

1. Caste and Socio-Economic Marginality: Lower castes like SCs and STs face systemic discrimination, limiting access to education, jobs, and land. Eg- 79% of rural SC households rely on manual labour, reflecting their economic disadvantage (SECC 2011).
2. Sociologist M.N.Srinivas in his concept of ‘dominant caste’ noted economic status of various cultural groups reflects historical privileges and disadvantages. Eg. Dominant castes like Brahmins, Jats, Marathas, Reddy, Yadavs, etc historically benefited from better access to education and employment.
3. Tribal Identity and Economic Exclusion: suffer from high poverty and displacement due to development projects. 50% of STs live in multidimensional poverty (MPI 2019). Eg- Bhils in Narmada valley displaced due to Sardar sarovar dam.
4. Religious Diversity and Economic Inequality: The Sachar Committee (2006) reported that Muslims lag behind in most socio-economic indicators.
5. Linguistic Diversity and Regional Inequality: Eg. ASER report noted only 14% of tribal children in grade 3 have comprehension skills.
6. Gender and Intersectionality: Women from marginalised cultural groups (SCs, STs, Muslims) experience double marginalisation due to both gender and socio-cultural identity. Only 11% of ST women complete higher education (NFHS-4), highlighting intersectional disadvantages.
7. Geographic and ethnic factors especially in context of north-eastern states, which are rich cultural diverse region, but experiencing lower socio-economic development. Eg. Ongoing conflict of kuki vs meitei in Manipur.
8. Policy and Governance Challenges: Affirmative action has helped, but elite capture within groups like OBCs leaves the most vulnerable excluded. Eg- Denotified Tribes (DNTs) and other subgroups often do not fully benefit from welfare schemes.

Challenging the Proposition

1. Political Representation: 15% of Parliament seats are reserved for SCs, and 7.5% for STs, enhancing political participation.
2. Religious and Linguistic Minorities Thriving: Eg: Sikhs are one of the wealthiest agricultural communities, and Jains have the highest literacy and income levels in India (Census 2011).
3. Affirmative Action Success: Reservations in education and employment for SCs, STs, and OBCs. SC/ST enrolment in higher education has risen to 21% due to reservation policies (AISHE 2020-21).
4. Economic Liberalisation: Economic reforms have benefited certain sections of marginalised groups, particularly OBCs, in accessing jobs in sectors like IT and services.
5. Development Programs: Government welfare schemes like MGNREGA and PM-KISAN have provided direct support to marginalised communities. Eg- MGNREGA created 309 crore person-days of work in 2022-23.
6. Cultural enrichment: diversity has promoted different avenues such as art,food,tourism and handicrafts. Eg. Red ant chutney of odisha got GI tag.

Way Forward

1. Strengthen Implementation of Affirmative Action –  Sub-categorization of SC and ST as mandated by SC in State of Punjab & Ors. vs Davinder Singh & Ors.
2. Promotion of Local Languages and culture: New Education Policy 2020 has supported the three-language policy.
3. Cultural Integration and Economic Empowerment: Supporting tribal handicrafts in regions like the Northeast and Odisha can create sustainable livelihoods while preserving cultural heritage. 
4. Improving Social Justice Systems: Strengthening the implementation of the Forest Rights Act of 2006 and PESA
5. Fostering Community-Based Development: Eg- Kudumbshree Model of Kerala
6. Enhancing Political Representation: Early implementation of 106th Constitutional Amendment Act.

A a multi-pronged approach with stakeholder participation is need to realise the Trinity of Social, Political and Economic empowerment of Marginalised communities. As PM Modi stated, “The nation is not just land for us, but an inspirational unit,” emphasizing the importance of unity in addressing these disparities.