💥Crack UPSC In 1st Attempt | Admission Open | Ultimate Assessment Program 2027/2028

Subject: Agriculture

  • Centre plans to amend Protection of Plant Variety and Farmers’ Rights (PPV&F) Act, 2001

    Why in the News?

    The Union Agriculture Minister has confirmed that the Protection of Plant Varieties and Farmers’ Rights Act, 2001 (PPV&FRA) will be amended, with the Centre incorporating inputs from farmers, scientists, civil society, and industry.

    About the Protection of Plant Varieties and Farmers’ Rights Act (PPV&FRA), 2001:

    • Overview: India’s sui generis legislation protects the rights of plant breeders, farmers, and local communities while promoting innovation and conserving agrobiodiversity.
    • TRIPS Compliance: Designed as an alternative to restrictive Union for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants (UPOV) models, recognising farmers both as cultivators and as breeders with equal legal standing.
    • Key Features:
      • Institutional Framework: Established the PPV&FR Authority, National Register of Plant Varieties, and the National Gene Bank for long-term conservation.
      • Farmers’ Rights: Allows farmers to save, use, sow, resow, exchange, share, and sell seeds of protected varieties (except branded seeds) and register their own varieties.
      • Breeders’ Rights: Grants exclusive commercialisation rights over registered varieties, subject to benefit-sharing and statutory limitations.
      • DUS Testing: Registration based on Distinctness, Uniformity, Stability, with protection of 15 years for annuals and 18 years for trees and vines.
      • Compulsory Licensing: Ensures public access where breeders fail to provide seeds at fair prices or adequate quantities.
      • Community Benefits: Provides for benefit-sharing, recognition of traditional varieties, and safeguards against unfair claims on farmer-developed seeds.
      • Scope of Varieties: Covers new, extant, farmers’, and essentially derived varieties.

    What are the Proposed Amendments?

    • Redefinition of ‘Variety’: Broadened to include combinations of genotypes and vegetative propagules such as tubers, bulbs, rhizomes, roots, synthetic seeds, and tissue-culture plants, aligning with the Seeds Bill 2019.
    • Expanded Definition of ‘Seed’: Includes all planting materials and vegetatively propagated parts to harmonise India’s seed laws.
    • Clarifying ‘Breeder’ and ‘Institution’: Updated to formally recognise both public and private bodies as legitimate breeders.
    • Strengthening DUS Testing: Adds trait-based descriptors, greater transparency, and safeguards against misuse seen in cases like njavara paddy.
    • Defining “Abusive Acts”: Introduces penalties for selling varieties with identical denominations or misusing breeder rights to gain monopolistic control.
    • Community Seed Rights: Ensures that community-developed and traditional varieties cannot be appropriated by private entities.
    • Protection Against Misappropriation: Prevents registration of varieties already tested or conserved by farmers without disclosure or consent.
    • Farmer Compensation: Strengthens mechanisms for compensating farmers when registered varieties underperform compared to breeder claims.
    • Global Alignment: Follows negotiations under the International Plant Treaty (MLS), especially on in situ conservation and equitable sharing of genetic resources.
    [UPSC 2014]  In the context of food and nutritional security of India, enhancing the ‘Seed Replacement Rates’ of various crops helps in achieving the food production targets of the future. But what is/are the constraint/constraints in its wider/greater implementation?

    1. There is no National Seeds Policy in place.

    2. There is no participation of private sector seed companies in the supply of quality seeds of vegetables and planting materials of horticultural crops.

    3. There is a demand-supply gap regarding quality seeds in case of low value and high volume crops.

    Select the correct answer using the code given below.
    Options: (a)  1 and 2 only (b)  3 only* (c)  2 and 3 only (d)  None of the above

     

  • [19th November 2025] The Hindu Op-ED: Time to sort out India’s cereal mess

    PYQ Relevance

    [UPSC 2024] Elucidate the importance of buffer stocks for stabilizing agricultural prices in India. What are the challenges associated with the storage of buffer stock? Discuss.

    Linkage: This PYQ is central to GS-III themes of food security, MSP, PDS and price stabilization. It links with the article’s focus on excess stocks and distorted procurement, showing why India’s buffer-stock management is becoming unsustainable.

    Mentor’s Comment

    India faces a cereal management crisis marked by procurement distortions, crop diversification failures, import dependence, and systemic leakages. This article unpacks the urgent concerns raised in “Time to sort out India’s cereal mess” and restructures them into an exam-oriented format that aligns with GS II and GS III themes such as food security, agriculture, subsidies, MSP, PDS, and federal coordination.

    Introduction

    India’s cereal ecosystem, procurement, storage, distribution, and diversification, stands at a difficult juncture. Excessive focus on paddy and rice under MSP, escalating procurement costs, growing import dependence in edible oils and pulses, and logistical inefficiencies have created structural vulnerabilities. The current controversy in Tamil Nadu’s paddy procurement highlights deeper national issues in cereal governance.

    Why in the News

    Tamil Nadu’s short-term kuruvai paddy procurement turned contentious due to time overruns and corruption charges, exposing systemic weaknesses in the procurement architecture. Despite years of surplus stock, India faces a paradox of simultaneous overproduction of rice and wheat and rising import dependence on pulses and edible oils, with 55% of edible oil demand met by imports. The scale of misalignment, such as rice stocks at 536.14 lakh tonnes in October, five times the requirement, reveals an unsustainable cereal management model requiring urgent correction.

    Understanding the Current Procurement Distortions

    1. Excessive Paddy Procurement: Tamil Nadu’s system led by TNCSC and FCI shows delays, over-coverage, and corruption, with farmers preferring paddy due to assured returns.
    2. High Central Pool Stocks: Rice stocks reached 536.14 lakh tonnes (Oct 2024) against norms of about 102.5 lakh tonnes, reflecting procurement far beyond requirement.
    3. Skewed Crop Incentives: Procurement levels for rice and wheat remain consistently higher than norms, reducing incentives for diversification.

    Why India’s Cereal Supply is Misaligned

    1. Surplus in Cereals: India maintains abundant stocks, e.g., rice procurement averaging 322 lakh tonnes over three years, indicating oversupply.
    2. Deficit in Pulses & Oilseeds: Despite large-scale cultivation, imports form a major share: India meets 55% of edible oil demand through imports.
    3. Stagnant Diversification: Farmers hesitate to shift due to uncertain support systems, weak price assurance, and inadequate crop guidance.

    Rising Import Dependence and Its Consequences

    1. High Import Bills: Edible oil imports breached 30,000 crore in 2023-24 despite domestic production dips from 157 lakh tonnes to 138 lakh tonnes over a decade.
    2. Geopolitical Risks: Events like the Russia-Ukraine conflict directly increased global edible oil prices, impacting domestic inflation.
    3. Oilseed Production Stagnation: Even after 2004 reforms, domestic acreage rose but yields and self-sufficiency remained stagnant.

    Structural Issues in India’s Crop Diversification Strategy

    1. Weak Extension Services: Farmers lack assured technical guidance and support for alternative crops.
    2. Higher Risk in Non-Paddy Crops: Limited MSP procurement outside cereals increases production risk.
    3. Fragmented Procurement Framework: Multiple agencies (FCI, State Corporations, NAFED) lead to inconsistent practices across states.

    Why Procurement Reforms are Urgent

    1. Inefficient FPO Integration: FPOs, though expanding, remain nascent and face poor access to credit, logistics, and markets.
    2. Leakages and Diversions: Instances of paddy moving outside the procurement chain due to better prices in open markets distort the system.
    3. Need for Commodity-Specific Strategy: Uniform procurement policies for cereals, pulses, and oilseeds fail to reflect regional agro-ecology and market diversity.

    Conclusion

    India’s cereal management crisis is not of shortage but of imbalance, overproduction of rice and wheat coexisting with deficits in pulses and edible oils. Procurement distortions, poor diversification incentives, and high import reliance underline the need for structural reforms. A shift towards agro-ecology-based diversification, procurement redesign, and FPO strengthening can realign India’s food security architecture.

  • Centre announces National Gopal Ratna Awards

    Why in the News?

    The National Gopal Ratna Awards for 2025 has been announced by the Department of Animal Husbandry and Dairying (DAHD) under the Ministry of Fisheries, Animal Husbandry and Dairying.

    About the National Gopal Ratna Awards:

    • Overview: Established in 2021 under the Rashtriya Gokul Mission to promote excellence in dairy management and indigenous breed conservation.
    • Target Groups: Recognises dairy farmers, Dairy Cooperatives, Milk Producer Companies (MPCs), Dairy FPOs, and Artificial Insemination (AI) Technicians for outstanding performance.
    • Breed Focus: Encourages scientific rearing and genetic improvement of indigenous cattle and buffalo breeds with high productivity and economic value.
    • Regional Inclusion: Contains a special category for North Eastern and Himalayan States to strengthen dairy development and acknowledge regional innovation.
    • Institutional Responsibility: Conferred annually by the Union Ministry of Fisheries, Animal Husbandry and Dairying.
    • Award Categories: Best Dairy Farmer (indigenous breeds), Best Dairy Cooperative Society or MPC or FPO, Best AI Technician, and special regional awards for NER/Himalayan States.
    • Selection Parameters: Based on breed improvement results, milk yield, adoption of scientific practices, cooperative performance, and quality of AI service delivery.
    • Participation Scale: Receives thousands of applications annually (e.g., 2081 entries in the current cycle), reflecting wide national engagement.
    • Commemoration: Awards are presented on National Milk Day (26 November), marking the birth anniversary of Dr. Verghese Kurien.

    Award Components and Cash Prizes:

    • Cash Awards: Given only in the first two categories: Best Dairy Farmer and Best Dairy Cooperative/MPC/FPO.
    • Prize Amounts:
      1. First prize- ₹5,00,000
      2. Second prize- ₹3,00,000
      3. Third prize- ₹2,00,000
    • Regional Prizes: Special NER and Himalayan category winners receive ₹2,00,000.
    • Artificial Insemination (AI) Technicians Category: No cash component; recognition only.
    [UPSC 2025] Regarding the Rashtriya Gokul Mission:

    I. It is important for the upliftment of rural poor as majority of low producing indigenous animals are with small and marginal farmers and landless labourers.

    II. It was initiated to promote indigenous cattle and buffalo rearing and conservation in a scientific and holistic manner.

    Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

    Options; (a) I only (b) II only (c) Both I and II* (d) Neither I nor II

     

  • Centre releases draft Seeds Bill, 2025

    Why in the News?

    The Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare has released the Draft Seeds Bill, 2025 for public consultation before its introduction in Parliament.

    Precursor to the Draft Seeds Bill, 2025:

    • Seeds Act, 1966: Regulated seed production, certification, sale, and import/export through central and state seed committees and certification agencies.
    • Seeds (Control) Order, 1983: Added licensing requirements for dealers and expanded oversight of notified seeds.
    • Why Reform? Old laws could not address modern hybrids, biotechnology, private R&D, global seed trade, or digital traceability – creating the need for an updated, technology-ready statute.

    About the Draft Seeds Bill, 2025:

    • Objective: Ensure farmers get affordable, high-quality seeds while improving transparency and ease of doing business in the seed value chain.
    • Purpose: Replaces the Seeds Act, 1966 and Seeds (Control) Order, 1983 to regulate seed quality, curb spurious seeds, strengthen traceability, and modernise India’s seed sector.
    • Scope: Covers seed production, registration, import, sale, quality control, penalties, farmer rights, and digital monitoring.

    Key Provisions of the Draft Bill:

    • Farmer Rights: Farmers may grow, sow, save, use, exchange, share, or sell seeds of any registered variety from their own holdings, except when sold under a brand name.
    • Mandatory Registration of Varieties: All seed varieties meant for commercial sale must be registered (export-only and farmers’ own-use varieties exempt).
    • Registration of Seed Businesses: Producers (non-farmers), processing units, dealers, distributors, and nurseries must register with the designated authority.
    • Digital Traceability: Introduces a Central Seed Traceability Portal; seed packets must carry QR codes to monitor provenance and quality.
    • Graded Penalties: Trivial-to-major offences defined. Minor offences may get warnings; moderate offences attract fines up to ₹2 lakh; major offences (spurious/unregistered seeds) attract fines up to ₹30 lakh and/or imprisonment up to 3 years.
    • Seed Testing & Enforcement: Central and state seed labs can be established/recognised. Inspectors may sample, seize, inspect premises, and verify records.
    • Import Regulation: Imported seeds must meet germination and purity standards; trial and research imports require permits.
    • Ease of Doing Business: Minor offences decriminalised; compliance simplified while retaining strict penalties for serious violations.

    Key Differences: Seeds Act 1966 vs Draft Seeds Bill 2025

    Seeds Act, 1966 / Seeds (Control) Order, 1983 Draft Seeds Bill, 2025
    Farmer Rights Implicit, not clearly articulated Explicit protection to save, use, exchange, share, sell non-branded seeds
    Variety Registration Only notified varieties regulated Mandatory registration for all commercial varieties
    Business Registration Focus on producers/dealers Mandatory for producers, processors, dealers, distributors, nurseries
    Traceability No digital tracking provisions QR-based seed traceability via Central Seed Portal
    Penalties Limited, less structured Graded penalties; major offences up to ₹30 lakh + imprisonment
    Imports Narrow regulation; limited trial mechanisms Structured system for import, research, and trial evaluations
    Ease of Doing Business More regulatory rigidity Decriminalisation of minor offences and reduced compliance burden
    Technological Fit Pre-hybrid, pre-biotech era framework Aligned with modern hybrids, biotech seeds, global seed trade

     

  • State of Food and Agriculture Report, 2025

    Why in the News?

    The State of Food and Agriculture (SOFA) Report 2025, released by the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) on 3 November 2025, highlights the alarming global impact of human-induced land degradation.

    About the SOFA Report:

    • Goal: Aims to help governments design sustainable land management and food security policies.
    • Publication: Released annually by the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) of the United Nations as one of its flagship analytical reports.
    • Focus (2025 Edition): Examines human-induced land degradation and its effects on agricultural productivity, poverty, and ecosystem stability.
    • Analytical Scope: Integrates soil data, land use patterns, crop yields, and socioeconomic indicators to identify global vulnerability hotspots.

    Key Global Findings (2025):

    • Population Exposure: Around 1.7 billion people live in land-degraded regions with declining agricultural output.
    • Deforestation Drivers: Agricultural expansion remains the cause of nearly 90% of global forest loss.
    • Land Use Trends (2001–2023): Global agricultural land shrank by 78 mha (–2%); cropland increased by 78 mha, while pastures declined by 151 mha.
    • Land Abandonment: About 3.6 mha of cropland is abandoned annually due to soil degradation.
    • Restoration Potential: Reversing 10% of degraded cropland could feed 154 million people yearly; restoring abandoned land could feed 476 million.
    • Vulnerability Hotspots: Sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia face the highest overlap of degradation, poverty, and child malnutrition.
    • Farm Structure Inequality: Small farms (<2 ha) constitute 85% of all farms but hold only 9% of farmland; large farms (>1,000 ha) control nearly 50% of it.
    • Degradation Masking: Large farms offset degradation through high input use, while smallholders face disproportionate yield losses.

    India-specific Insights:

    • Overview: India among countries with highest yield losses due to human-driven land degradation.
    • Regional Impact: Eastern and southern India worst affected owing to dense population and intensive cropping.
    • Major Causes: Include soil erosion, nutrient depletion, deforestation, and over-irrigation.
    • FAO Recommendations:
      • Scale up sustainable land management, soil health, and watershed programs.
      • Promote precision farming, agroforestry, and organic inputs for soil restoration.
      • Strengthen smallholder resilience through credit, technology, and market access.
      • Integrate land restoration with national missions like PM-KUSUM and PMKSY for long-term sustainability.
    [UPSC 2024] Consider the following statements:

    1. India is a member of the International Grains Council.

    2. The country needs to be a member of the International Grains Council for exporting or importing rice and wheat.

    Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

    Options: (a) 1 only* (b) 2 only (c) Both 1 and 2 (d) Neither 1 nor 2

     

  • [pib] National Beekeeping & Honey Mission (NBHM)

    Why in the News?

    The National Beekeeping and Honey Mission (2020–21 to 2025–26) is set to conclude this fiscal year.

    About National Beekeeping & Honey Mission (NBHM):

    • Overview: A Central Sector Scheme (2020) under Atmanirbhar Bharat Abhiyan, promoting scientific beekeeping and driving a “Sweet Revolution” for rural income enhancement.
    • Implementing Agency: Executed by the National Bee Board (NBB) under the Ministry of Agriculture & Farmers Welfare.
    • Financial Outlay: ₹500 crore for FY 2020–21 to 2025–26.
    • Core Aim: Boost honey production, pollination-based crop productivity, and farmers’ income through structured beekeeping and processing infrastructure.
    • Technology & Quality Focus: Promotes traceability, quality assurance, and digital registration via the Madhukranti Portal.
    • Implementation Structure:
      1. Mini Mission–I: Enhances honey and hive product production through scientific beekeeping and pollination.
      2. Mini Mission–II: Focuses on post-harvest management, collection, processing, storage, marketing, and value addition.
      3. Mini Mission–III: Supports research, innovation, and capacity building for technology-driven solutions.
    • Institutional Network: Coordinated by NBB, involving NDDB, NAFED, TRIFED, ICAR, KVIC, SRLM/NRLM, and MSME bodies at national and state levels.

    Achievements & Progress:

    • Production & Exports: India produced 1.4 lakh MT honey (2024); exported 1.07 lakh MT worth USD 177.55 million (FY 2023–24), rising to 2nd globally from 9th in 2020.
    • Infrastructure Development: Established 6 world-class labs, 47 mini labs, 6 diagnostic labs, 8 hiring centres, 26 processing units, 18 branding units, and 10 cold storages.
    • Research Hub: National Centre of Excellence in Beekeeping set up at IIT Roorkee for innovation and training.
    • Empowerment Initiatives: 167 SHG projects, 97 FPOs, 424 ha demonstrations, and 288 ha bee-friendly plantations sanctioned for livelihood diversification.
    • Digital Integration: Madhukranti Portal hosts 14,859 beekeepers, 269 societies, 206 companies, with blockchain-based traceability for export-grade quality.
    • Policy Support: Minimum Export Price (MEP) of USD 2,000/MT (till Dec 2024) set to curb dumping of inferior honey and safeguard domestic producers.
  • [pib] National Marine Fisheries Census, 2025

    Why in the News?

    Union Minister of State for Fisheries, Animal Husbandry, and Dairying George Kurian officially launched the National Marine Fisheries Census (MFC) 2025 at ICAR–Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute (CMFRI).

    About National Marine Fisheries Census, 2025:

    • Objective: To collect detailed data on fishermen population, crafts, gear, livelihood patterns, and welfare indicators for evidence-based policy and blue economy planning.
    • Overview: The 5th national enumeration of India’s marine fisheries sector after 1980, 1998, 2005, and 2010 rounds.
    • Implementing Agencies: Conducted by the Department of Fisheries (DoF) under the Ministry of Fisheries, Animal Husbandry & Dairying, coordinated by ICAR–CMFRI with Fishery Survey of India (FSI) as operational partner.
    • Coverage: Encompasses 1.2 million fisher households across 4,000–5,000 marine fishing villages in nine coastal states and four UTs, including Andaman & Nicobar Islands and Lakshadweep.
    • Funding & Legal Basis: Financed under the Pradhan Mantri Matsya Sampada Yojana (PMMSY) with an allocation of ₹16.2 crore for digital census operations.

    Key Features:

    • Digital Data Collection: First paperless marine census using apps, VyAS Bharat, VyAS Sutra, and VyAS NAV, enabling geo-tagged, real-time data capture and validation.
    • Technological Integration: Uses drone-based craft surveys and live dashboards at CMFRI; establishes a National Marine Fisheries Data Centre for analytics and storage.
    • Expanded Scope: Covers ornamental fisheries, seaweed farming, and post-harvest value chain activities; includes data on credit, insurance, and welfare access.
    • NFDP Linkage: Mandates registration on the National Fisheries Digital Platform (NFDP) to ensure DBT-based benefit delivery under PM Matsya Kisan Samridhi Sah-Yojana (PM-MKSSY).
    • Inclusive Approach: Involves 1,000+ trained enumerators with state departments and fisher cooperatives, promoting community participation for accuracy.
    • Government Initiative: Promotes safety tools like vessel transponders and turtle excluder devices (TEDs); embodies the vision “Smart Census, Smarter Fisheries.”
  • [pib] Integrated Cold Chain and Value Addition Infrastructure (ICCVAI)

    Why in the News?

    The Union Cabinet has approved an enhanced outlay of ₹6,520 crore for the Pradhan Mantri Kisan Sampada Yojana (PMKSY), including ₹1,000 crore earmarked for 50 irradiation units under the Integrated Cold Chain and Value Addition Infrastructure (ICCVAI) Scheme.

    About the Integrated Cold Chain and Value Addition Infrastructure (ICCVAI) Scheme:

    • Objective: To build an end-to-end cold chain and value addition system from farm gate to consumer, ensuring unbroken preservation, reduced losses, and fair returns to farmers.
    • Overview: A Central Sector Scheme under the Ministry of Food Processing Industries (MoFPI), implemented as a component of the Pradhan Mantri Kisan Sampada Yojana (PMKSY).
    • Coverage: Focuses on non-horticultural produce, dairy, meat, poultry, and marine fish, while fruits, vegetables, and shrimp fall under Operation Greens.
    • Goal: Minimise post-harvest wastage, promote value addition, and provide year-round food availability through modern cold chain infrastructure.
    • Participation: Open to farmers, FPOs/FPCs, cooperatives, SHGs, NGOs, companies, and PSUs on a demand-driven basis.

    Details of the ICCVAI Scheme:

    • Objectives: Develop pre-cooling, cold storage, processing, and refrigerated transport; strengthen farmer–market linkages; promote modern technologies like irradiation and renewable energy; and enhance food safety and shelf life.
    • Infrastructure Components:
      • Farm-Level Infrastructure (FLI): Pre-cooling, grading, packaging near production zones.
      • Processing Centres: Multi-product processing and testing units.
      • Distribution Hubs: Multi-temperature storage for aggregation and retail dispatch.
      • Refrigerated Transport: Reefer vans and mobile tankers for seamless cold logistics.
      • Irradiation Units: For sterilisation and shelf-life extension via ionising radiation.
    • Financial Assistance:
      • 35% of project cost in general areas; 50% in difficult areas (NE, hill states, islands, ITDP regions) or for SC/ST/FPO/SHG entities.
      • Grant cap: ₹ 10 crore per project, released in three instalments.
      • 2025 Update: Union Cabinet raised PMKSY’s total outlay to ₹6,520 crore, with ₹1,000 crore for 50 irradiation units under ICCVAI.
    • Eligibility Conditions: Applicants must have net worth ≥ 1.5× the grant (general areas) or equal to the grant (special areas). Each project must integrate Farm-Level Infrastructure with a Distribution Hub and/or refrigerated transport.
    • Implementation Progress:
      • 395 projects approved, 291 operational.
      • Created 25.52 LMT preservation capacity and 114.66 LMT processing capacity.
      • Generated 1.74 lakh jobs nationwide.

    Complementary Government Initiatives:

    • Mission for Integrated Development of Horticulture (MIDH): Credit-linked subsidy for cold storages up to 5,000 MT.
    • National Horticulture Board (NHB): Promotes Controlled Atmosphere (CA) storages for horticulture.
    • Operation Greens (PMKSY):  Stabilises supply chains for fruits, vegetables, and shrimp.
    • Agriculture Infrastructure Fund (AIF): 3% interest subvention on loans up to ₹2 crore for cold chain and processing units.
    • National Centre for Cold-chain Development (NCCD): Think tank for standards, training, and best practices in cold logistics.
    [UPSC 2024] With reference to the sectors of the Indian economy, consider the following pairs: Economic activity Sector

    1. Storage of agricultural produce Secondary

    2. Dairy farm Primary

    3. Mineral exploration Tertiary

    4. Weaving cloth Secondary

    How many of the pairs given above are correctly matched?

    Options: (a) Only one pair (b) Only two pairs* (c) Only three (d) All four

     

  • Cabinet approved the Nutrient Based Subsidy (NBS) Rates for Rabi 2025- 26

    Why in the News?

    The Union Cabinet has approved the Nutrient-Based Subsidy (NBS) rates for Rabi 2025–26 (October 1, 2025 – March 31, 2026) on Phosphatic and Potassic (P&K) fertilizers.

    About the Nutrient-Based Subsidy (NBS) Scheme:

    • Overview: Introduced on April 1, 2010, by the Department of Fertilizers, Ministry of Chemicals and Fertilizers, Government of India.
    • Nature: A Central Sector Scheme providing fertilisers at subsidized rates based on nutrient content rather than product type.
    • Nutrients Covered: Subsidy is fixed per kilogram of Nitrogen (N), Phosphorus (P), Potash (K), and Sulphur (S).
    • Coverage: Applies to 28 grades of Phosphatic and Potassic (P&K) fertilizers, including Di-Ammonium Phosphate (DAP), NPKS grades, and fortified fertilizers containing micronutrients such as zinc and molybdenum.
    • Exclusion: Urea is not covered under NBS; it remains price-controlled and sold at a fixed MRP by the government.
    • Objective: Ensures balanced fertilizer use (optimal N: P: K ratio of 4:2:1) to maintain soil fertility, increase productivity, and promote sustainable agriculture.
    • Subsidy Mechanism: Subsidy is paid directly to fertilizer manufacturers/importers based on notified per-kg nutrient rates, enabling sale to farmers at affordable prices.
    • Rationale: Aims to insulate farmers from international price volatility of fertilizer inputs such as urea, DAP, MOP, and sulphur, while maintaining fiscal prudence.
    • Additional Support: Fertilizers fortified with secondary, and micronutrients are eligible for additional subsidy.
    • Institutional Role: Department of Fertilizers monitors implementation; state agriculture departments ensure field-level availability and prevent diversion.
    • Major Benefits:
      • Ensures timely and affordable access to fertilizers.
      • Promotes balanced nutrient application and soil health.
      • Supports food security and agricultural productivity.
      • Rationalizes government subsidy expenditure.
      • Encourages domestic fertilizer production and reduces import dependence.
    • Issues:
      • Exclusion of urea leads to its overuse and nutrient imbalance.
      • Rising fiscal burden; fertiliser subsidy is India’s second-largest after food subsidy.
      • Continued chemical fertiliser dependence affects long-term soil sustainability.
    [UPSC 2020] With reference to chemical fertilizers in India, consider the following statements:
    1. At present, the retail price of chemical fertilizers is market-driven and not administered by the Government.
    2. Ammonia, which is an input of urea, is produced from natural gas.
    3. Sulphur, which is a raw material for Phosphoric acid fertilizer, is a by-product of oil refineries.
    Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
    Options: (a) 1 only (b) 2 and 3 only* (c) 2 only (d) 1, 2 and 3

     

  • Trouble in ‘Soy State’-The Brewing Crisis in Madhya Pradesh’s Soybean Sector

    Introduction

    Madhya Pradesh contributes nearly 60% of India’s soybean output, earning its title as the Soy State. However, falling yields, poor returns, and uncertain government support are driving young farmers away from cultivation. The state, which once symbolized India’s success in expanding oilseed production, from 300,000 hectares in the 1970s to over 12 million hectares today, is now facing a turning point. Issues surrounding MSP, seed quality, and potential soybean imports have triggered widespread concern among cultivators.

    Declining Interest in Soybean Cultivation

    1. Generational shift: Young farmers are abandoning soybean farming despite their families’ legacy due to poor income and rising costs.
    2. Low profitability: Farmers report earnings of only ₹5,000–₹6,000 per quintal, while production costs remain high due to fertilizers, diesel, and seed expenses.
    3. Falling acreage: MP’s soybean acreage fell from 5.7 million hectares in 2023 to 5.1 million hectares in 2024, marking a 10% decline.
    4. Shift to alternatives: Many farmers are switching to urad, moong, maize, or cash crops that offer higher or more stable returns.

    Why Are Farmers Losing Faith in MSP?

    1. Improper implementation: Though the Centre announced ₹4,600 per quintal as MSP, most farmers sell below it due to lack of procurement infrastructure.
    2. Ceiling price issue: The government fixed a “ceiling price” of ₹4,300 per quintal for private buyers, making market rates unprofitable for producers.
    3. Limited procurement centres: Farmers complain of delayed payments and unavailability of buyers at MSP, forcing distress sales.
    4. Mismatch with cost of cultivation: Even after MSP hikes, real income remains stagnant due to higher input costs.

    The Threat of Soybean Imports

    1. Policy uncertainty: Reports of possible U.S. soybean imports have caused panic among domestic farmers.
    2. Price depression: Imported soybean meal could reduce domestic demand, pushing prices below MSP levels.
    3. Industry divide: Processors argue that imports are needed to stabilize edible oil prices, but cultivators fear it will cripple local production.
    4. Farm unions’ protest: The Soybean Processors Association of India (SOPA) and farmers’ groups have demanded a ban on import proposals, calling it a “death blow” to the domestic industry.

    What Are the Structural Problems Behind the Soybean Crisis?

    1. Seed quality issues: Farmers allege substandard seeds, resulting in poor germination and low yields.
    2. Inadequate extension services: Absence of updated agronomic practices and low use of scientific techniques hinder productivity.
    3. High input costs: Fertilizers, pesticides, and labour costs have nearly doubled over the last five years.
    4. Climate vulnerability: Irregular rainfall and pest infestations (like girdle beetle and stem fly) have further reduced yields.
    5. Weak farmer organizations: Lack of effective cooperatives and marketing federations reduces farmers’ bargaining power.

    How Has Soybean Production Shaped India’s Agricultural Growth?

    1. Historical expansion: From 300,000 ha in the 1970s to 12 million ha today, soybean has been India’s fastest growing crop.
    2. Export potential: Soymeal exports to East Asia once contributed significantly to India’s agri-trade surplus.
    3. Edible oil dependence: Soybean accounts for nearly 35% of India’s oilseed area and plays a key role in reducing import dependency.
    4. Policy linkage: The crop was promoted under Technology Mission on Oilseeds (1986), which revolutionized oilseed cultivation patterns.

    Reviving Faith in Oilseed Farming

    1. Long term MSP assurance: A 3 year guaranteed MSP policy can restore confidence and reduce uncertainty.
    2. Seed innovation: Investment in high-yielding, pest-resistant seed varieties through ICAR and private collaboration.
    3. Market infrastructure: Expansion of procurement centres and digital payment systems to ensure fair realization.
    4. Diversification support: Incentivizing mixed cropping and integrated farming models to mitigate risk.
    5. Value chain strengthening: Promotion of domestic processing units and branding for soybean-based products.

    Conclusion

    The “Soy State” stands at a crossroads. The crisis in Madhya Pradesh reflects the larger policy dilemma of India’s agricultural system, balancing market liberalization with farmer protection. Unless structural issues like MSP implementation, seed quality, and import regulation are addressed, India risks losing self-reliance in a crop that transformed its rural economy. The need of the hour is a farmer-centric reform agenda that enhances profitability, productivity, and predictability in oilseed cultivation.

    PYQ Relevance

    [UPSC 2018] What are the major reasons for declining rice and wheat yield in the cropping system? How crop diversification is helpful to stabilise the yield of the crops in the system?

    Linkage: UPSC’s recurring theme of agriculture and crop diversification finds direct relevance here. The soybean crisis in Madhya Pradesh mirrors the same structural issues of monocropping stress, declining productivity, and need for diversified cropping systems to ensure long-term yield stability and farmer resilience.