💥Join UPSC 2027,2028 Mentorship (August Batch) + XFactor Notes & Microthemes PDF
Talk to Mentor

Civilsdaily

Login

Subject: Economics

  • What the budget needs to do

    Context

    We need to insure the most vulnerable against shocks such as Covid, but even more, we need to create good job opportunities for the unskilled. What can the budget do?

    Impact on informal economy

    • The last two quarters have seen a substantive recovery in the Indian economy.
    • Corporate profitability of our largest firms has hit a new record this year.
    • So have GST collections, another indicator of the formal economy, with an average monthly collection of Rs 1.2 trillion in the second and third quarters.
    • The glass though is half full, the informal economy was particularly badly hit by Covid and its associated lockdowns.
    • Small enterprises, retail, hospitality, and construction were all hammered.
    • These were our main source of recent employment growth.
    •  Agricultural employment has risen in the last year-and-a-half, while manufacturing and services employment has fallen — this is the opposite of development.
    •  Informal service sector jobs may not seem like great jobs to us, but they are greatly prized relative to eking out a marginal existence in agriculture.
    • We need to insure the most vulnerable against such shocks, but even more, we need to create good job opportunities for the unskilled, equip people at all levels to participate more fully in the modern economy, and systemically promote wider policies of inclusion.

    What can the budget do?

    • Create good jobs for unskilled: The way it can do so directly is through accelerating spending on infrastructure.
    • The National Infrastructure Pipeline has identified a good set of projects.
    • The government should be complimented for its intention and ambition; what we need now is implementation.
    • Labour-intensive manufacturing: Most countries developed by putting millions to work in labour-intensive manufacturing.
    • We do not have the huge firms in export-oriented labour-intensive sectors that employ millions in China, Vietnam, and Bangladesh.
    •  Bangladesh has thrived by putting millions to work in manufacturing.
    • A booming garment sector employs 4.4 million.
    • As 80 per cent of those employed in garment factories are women, Bangladesh has twice the female labour force participation ratio of India.
    • Implement labour laws: In June and September 2020, the government passed four labour laws.
    • These laws have since been left dormant.
    • The budget should announce a time frame for implementation, notification by the Union government and then by the states.
    • Investment in education and skilling:  India has among the least skilled workforces in the world.
    • Under 5 per cent of our workforce is formally skilled, compared to 96 per cent in South Korea, 75 per cent in Germany and 52 per cent in the US.
    • That is why the work of the National Skills Development Corporation is so important.
    • Can the budget specify it as an independent entity controlled and run by the private sector that is then held accountable for delivering on our skilling targets.
    • Education is even more important, especially primary education.
    • Pratham’s education reports make for sobering reading.
    • The New Education Policy has a proposal that every second standard child should be able to read and do arithmetic at the second standard level as a foundation for further education.
    • This welcome initiative must receive greater dedication and focus from both government and industry.
    • School education is a state subject, so the Union budget can at best incentivise states to do the right things, say by linking the flow of additional funds to those that demonstrate improved second standard learning outcomes.
    • As a part of CSR, many companies work actively with schools.
    • Education is already the largest single area for CSR spending, accounting for one-third of the Rs 9,000 crore spent by the top 100 companies.

    Conclusion

    Other policies for economic inclusion must go beyond social inclusion. These include measures like reducing tariffs to benefit millions of consumers instead of thousands of firms. Industrial policies that help all firms such as the ease of doing business, instead of incentivising a selected few.

    UPSC 2022 countdown has begun! Get your personal guidance plan now! (Click here)

     

  • What is World Economic Forum’s Davos Agenda ’22?

    PM Modi has made a special address ahead of the theme-setting World Economic Forum (WEF) Agenda on the ‘State of the World’ at Davos.

    About World Economic Forum (WEF)

    • WEF is an international non-governmental and lobbying organisation based in Cologny, canton of Geneva, Switzerland.
    • It was founded on 24 January 1971 by German engineer and economist Klaus Schwab.
    • The foundation, which is mostly funded by its 1,000 member companies – typically global enterprises with more than five billion US dollars in turnover – as well as public subsidies.
    • It aims at improving the state of the world by engaging business, political, academic, and other leaders of society to shape global, regional, and industry agendas.

    Major reports released:

    • Engaging Tomorrow Consumer Report
    • Inclusive growth & Development Report
    • Environmental Performance Index
    • Global Competitive Index
    • Global Energy Architecture Performance Index Report
    • Global Gender Gap Report
    • Global Information Technology Report
    • Human Capital Report
    • Inclusive growth & Development Report
    • Global Risk Report
    • Travel and Tourism Competitiveness Report by WEF

    Important agenda: Davos meeting

    • The WEF is mostly known for its annual meeting at the end of January in Davos, a mountain resort in the eastern Alps region of Switzerland.
    • The meeting brings together some 3,000 paying members and selected participants – among which are investors, business leaders, political leaders, economists, celebrities and journalists.

    Why is WEF important?

    • Common platform: The WEF summit brings together the who’s-who of the political and corporate world, including heads of state, policymakers, top executives, industrialists, media personalities, and technocrats.
    • Influence global decision-making: Deliberations at the WEF influence public sector and corporate decision-making.
    • Discusses global challenges: It especially emphasizes on the issues of global importance such as poverty, social challenges, climate change, and global economic recovery.
    • Brings in all stakeholders: The heady mix of economic, corporate, and political leadership provides an ideal opportunity for finding solutions to global challenges that may emerge from time to time.

    What are the main initiatives?

    • Agenda 2022 will see the launch of other WEF initiatives meant for:
    1. Accelerating the mission to net-zero emissions
    2. Economic opportunity of nature-positive solutions
    3. Cyber resilience

    Criticisms of WEF

    • WEF has been criticized for being more of a networking hub than a nebula of intellect or a forum to find effective solutions to global issues.
    • It is also criticized for the lack of representation from varied sections of the civil society and for falling short of delivering effective solutions.

    Way forward

    • WEF sees large-scale participation of top industry, business leaders, civil society, and international organizations every year.
    • This collaboration is necessary for addressing global concerns such as climate change and pandemic management.
    • It is one of such few platform, that provides an opportunity for collaboration through comprehensive dialogue.

     

    UPSC 2022 countdown has begun! Get your personal guidance plan now! (Click here)

  • Highlights of the Inequality Kills Report

    The COVID-19 pandemic has heightened economic inequalities across the world says the Inequality Kills Report.

    Try substantiating this:

     

    Q. Extreme inequality is a form of ‘economic violence’—where structural and systemic policy and political choices are skewed in favor of the richest and the most powerful people. Critically examine.

    What is the “Inequality Kills” Report?

    • “Inequality Kills: The unparalleled action needed to combat unprecedented inequality in the wake of COVID-19” is a report released in January 2022 by Oxfam, a U.K.-based consortium.
    • The report argues for sustained and immediate action to end the pandemic, address global inequality and initiate concerted measures to tackle the climate emergency.
    • The central argument of the report is that inequality is a death sentence for people that are marginalized by social and economic structures and removed from political decision-making.

    Key highlights

    • Billionaire variants: Identifying this process as “the billionaire variant”, the report says that this vertical aggregation of global wealth into the hands of a few is “profoundly dangerous for our world”.
    • Pauperization: 160 million people were rendered poor during the pandemic, while the ten richest people doubled their fortunes since the start of the pandemic.
    • Vaccine apartheid: Holding governments to account the report identifies “vaccine apartheid” (unequal access to vaccines between countries) and the lack of universal vaccination programs in many countries.
    • Inflation: It also demonstrates how emergency government expenditure (estimated at $16 trillion) that was meant to keep economies afloat during this crisis, inflated stock prices.
    • Collective: This resulted in billionaires’ collective wealth increasing by $5 trillion during the pandemic.

    Why does the report say that inequality kills?

    • For the writers of the report inequality is not an abstract theory.
    • Instead, they see it as institutionalized violence against poorer people.
    • Extreme inequality is a form of ‘economic violence’—where structural and systemic policy and political choices that are skewed in favor of the richest and the most powerful people.
    • This results in direct harm to the vast majority of ordinary people worldwide.

    Implications of inequality

    • Crime and violence: The report identifies higher inequality with more crime and violence and less social trust.
    • Impact on marginalized: The brunt of inequality and the violence is borne, for instance, by women across the world, Dalits in India, Black, Native American and Latin persons in the US and indigenous groups in many countries.
    • Victimization of women: Pointing to the example of women, the problem runs a lot deeper as 13 million women have not returned to the workforce and 20 million girls are at risk of losing access to education.

    Way ahead

    The “Inequality Kills” report proposes far-reaching changes to structures of government, economy and policy-making to fight inequality.

    • Vaccine sharing: It urgently asks for “vaccine recipes” to be made open-source so that every qualified vaccine manufacturer can manufacture them.
    • Taxing the opportunists: The report then asks for governments to claw back the wealth from billionaires by administering solidarity taxes higher than 90% especially on the billionaires that have profited during pandemic.
    • Taxation reforms: The report asks for permanent cancellation of tax havens, progressive taxation on corporations and an end to tax dodging by corporations.
    • Welfare: The report then suggests that this regained wealth be redirected towards building income safety nets, universalizing healthcare for everyone, investing in green technologies and democratizing them, and, investing in protecting women from violence.

     

    UPSC 2022 countdown has begun! Get your personal guidance plan now! (Click here)

  • How  do  SDRs  help maintain Balance of Payments (BoP)?

    A recent report by the RBI shows that India received support of $17.86 billion in August 2021 by way of Special Drawing Rights (SDRs) has helped cushion the worsening current account deficit.

    What are Special Drawing Rights (SDRs)?

    • SDRs, created by the IMF in 1969, are an international reserve asset and are meant to supplement countries’ reserves.
    • Adding SDRs to the country’s international reserves makes it more financially resilient.
    • Providing liquidity support to developing and low-income countries allows them to tide over the balance of payments (BOP) situations like the one India has been experiencing due to the pandemic and the one it faced earlier in 1991.
    • SDRs being one of the components of foreign exchange reserves (FER) of a country, an increase in its holdings is reflected in the BOP.

    What are the key components of BOP?

    The BOP divides transactions of a country with the rest of the world into two accounts:

    1. Current Account: It consists of net trade of exports and imports of products and services, net earnings on cross-border investments and net transfer payments.
    2. Capital Account: It constitutes a country’s transactions in financial instruments i.e. assets and liabilities constituting of direct investment, portfolio investment, loans, banking capital, and other capital.

    What does the SDR support signify?

    • Pandemic impact: Countries worldwide are going through one of the worst health and economic crises, and India has been no exception.
    • Domestic business underperformance: It is also indicative of the fact that the domestic business environment is failing to attract foreign direct investment.

    Is dependence on SDR a matter of concern?

    A BOP dependent on an SDR-dependent capital account surplus to cushion the country’s widening current account deficit is not a comfortable position to be in.

    • Compulsion for reforms: Importantly, IMF support comes with a baggage of conditions as was the case in 1991—the support came with the condition that India initiates big-ticket economic reforms.
    • Sovereign decisions: Any democratic country would be more comfortable with sovereign rights to design its policy strategy.

    Back2Basics:  Foreign Exchange Reserve

    • Foreign exchange reserves are important assets held by the central bank in foreign currencies as reserves.
    • They are commonly used to support the exchange rate and set monetary policy.
    • In India’s case, foreign reserves include Gold, Dollars, and the IMF’s quota for Special Drawing Rights.
    • Most of the reserves are usually held in US dollars, given the currency’s importance in the international financial and trading system.
    • Some central banks keep reserves in Euros, British pounds, Japanese yen, or Chinese yuan, in addition to their US dollar reserves.

    India’s forex reserves cover:

    1. Foreign Currency Assets (FCAs)
    2. Special Drawing Rights (SDRs)
    3. Gold Reserves
    4. Reserve position with the International Monetary Fund (IMF)

    Significance of these reserves

    • Import support: Holding liquid foreign currency provides a cushion against such effects and provides confidence that there will still be enough foreign exchange to help the country with crucial imports in case of external shocks.
    • USD reserves: All international transactions are settled in US dollars and, therefore, required to support India’s imports.
    • Exchange rate regulation: More importantly, they need to maintain support and confidence for central bank action, whether monetary policy action or any exchange rate intervention to support the domestic currency.
    • Cushion against inflation: It also helps to limit any vulnerability due to sudden disturbances in foreign capital flows, which may arise during a crisis.

    Initiatives taken by the government to increase forex

    • Self reliance: To increase the foreign exchange reserves, the GoI has taken many initiatives like Atmanirbhar Bharat, in which India has to be made a self-reliant nation so that India does not have to import things that India can produce.
    • Duty remission: The government has started schemes like Duty Exemption Scheme, Remission of Duty or Taxes on Export Product (RoDTEP), Nirvik (Niryat Rin Vikas Yojana) scheme, etc.
    • FDI and EoDB: Apart from these schemes, India is one of the top countries that attracted the highest amount of Foreign Direct Investment, thereby improving India’s foreign exchange reserves.

     

    UPSC 2022 countdown has begun! Get your personal guidance plan now! (Click here)

  • How predatory pricing is affecting distributors and traders

    Context

    Consumer goods distributors in Maharashtra has been protesting against Colgate’s alleged unfair treatment of traditional distributors vis-à-vis B2B (Business-to-Business) technology companies such as Reliance’s JioMart, Udaan and others.

    The disruption caused by B2B companies

    • Nearly half-a-million of India’s distributors pick up goods from consumer companies such as Colgate and deliver them to 13 million small local stores located in 7,00,000 villages and towns across the country through a web of millions of traders and other intermediaries.
    • Enter the new age technology B2B companies.
    • They have developed technologies to connect directly to the kirana store through a mobile phone app, bypassing the intermediaries.
    • They supply goods to the local store for lower prices than the charged by the distributor.
    • Unable to match such prices and facing the peril of losing business, India’s distributors claim these are unfair practices and want manufacturers such as to stop supplying goods to the technology companies.

    Issue of disruption caused by the pricing power and predatory pricing

    • Creative destruction: New innovations disrupting an existing process and rendering incumbents futile is generally a healthy process of ‘creative destruction’, as the Austrian economist, Joseph Schumpeter, postulated.
    • But this disruption in India is driven not entirely by technology innovation but also through pricing power.
    • These technology companies bear the loss on the products they sell to the local store.
    • Further, they offer extensive credit terms and working capital to the local stores.
    • In other words, these technology companies rely not just on their mobile phone app innovation but also steep price discounting and cheaper financing to win customers.
    • Evidently, these companies use the money to not only build new technologies but also to undercut competitors and steal market share. 
    • This practice, called predatory pricing, is illegal in most countries including India.
    • These companies are supplied with funds from foreign venture capital firms, which in turn are largely funded by American pension funds and university endowments.
    • The flip side is that India’s millions of distributors and intermediaries have no access to such finance.
    • These small companies are cut off from the endless stream of free foreign money that gushes into new age ‘startups’ and established large corporates.

    Problems created by predatory pricing

    • While consumers may benefit from lower prices, the livelihoods of millions of distributors, traders and their families suffer.
    • To be sure, this is not just an India problem but a global one.
    •  Social media companies such as Facebook give away their products for free and e-commerce companies such as Amazon sell at lower prices, benefiting consumers enormously, but also causing immense social strife and disharmony.
    • But in India’s case, there is an added complexity of foreign capital flows.
    • Access to this capital is only available to a tiny proportion of Indian businesses but threatens the livelihoods of millions of Indian families, as in the case of distributors, causing massive income and social disparities.
    • This unequal access to capital creates leads to anti-competitive behaviour.

    Consider the question “What is predatory pricing? What are the issues created by predatory pricing?”

    Conclusion

    To be clear, this is not a Luddite argument against e-commerce or technological innovations. The issue is about illegal predatory pricing and abuse of pricing power by startups and big corporates through preferential access to easy foreign money.

    UPSC 2022 countdown has begun! Get your personal guidance plan now! (Click here)

  • Opportunity for agri-reforms in Punjab

    Context

    It is no secret that Punjab, once the frontrunner of Indian agriculture, is struggling to retain its dynamism.

    Need to diversify

    • While Punjab ranked at the top of major Indian states in terms of per capita income during 1967-68 to 2002-03, it has slipped below the 13th position.
    • Punjab’s agricultural growth rate, at 5.7 per cent, was more than double the country’s average of 2.3 per cent during 1971-72 to 1985-86.
    • This has reversed between 2005 and 2019 with Punjab at 1.9 per cent and India at 3.7 per cent.
    • Agriculture least diversified state: With almost 85 per cent of the gross cropped area under wheat and rice, agriculture is least diversified in the state. 
    • Mandi transactions cost about 8.5 per cent of the MSP, the highest in the country, making Punjab wheat and rice less competitive.

    What explains low diversification in agriculture?

    • Policies: Guaranteed MSP for wheat and paddy, backed by assured procurement, free power and highly subsidised fertilisers, has disincentivised diversification.
    • Political economy: The political economy around wheat and rice is so intense that any effort to address its distortionary impact is met with fierce opposition by vested interest groups.

    How to recalibrate Punjab agriculture towards higher, sustainable growth?

    • Augment livestock and milk processing: While fruits and vegetables account for 7.4 per cent of the value of the output of agriculture and allied sectors, livestock accounts for 31.5 per cent and fisheries less than 1 per cent.
    • The state has the highest per capita availability of milk but it can process less than 20 per cent of it.
    •  Promoting mega parks for value addition in fruits and vegetables, milk, and other livestock products through medium and small enterprises will strengthen its competitiveness.
    • Strengthen market for seed potato: It is also a significant player in seed potato and with the right package of practices, traceability systems, and infrastructure, the market for Punjab seed potato can be strengthened.
    • Scaling up alternative marketing channel: Alternative marketing channels for fruits and vegetables such as direct marketing, contract farming, and exports have been in place but these models need to be scaled up with the right ecosystem.
    • Shift to demand-driven agriculture: Punjab needs to switch from supply-driven agriculture to demand-driven agriculture.
    • The demand for fisheries, poultry, dairy, and fruits and vegetables is increasing way faster than the demand for wheat and rice.
    • Rationalise mandi charges:  Rationalising mandi charges to not more than 3 per cent will attract private sector investments in building efficient value chains.
    • Rationalise subsidies: Time-bound incentives in the form of freight subsidies for exporters of high-value agri-produce, tax exemptions for the processing of perishable commodities for value chain players would be more rational than the overloaded subsidies of urea and free power.
    • Use technology and start-up revolution: Punjab should leverage the start-up revolution that is unfolding in India, and use technology to ensure optimal utilisation of resources, expand markets, and augment farmers’ income.
    • Geo-tagging of farms can address concerns related to long-term leasing of land that is critical for large-scale investments and enable vibrant agricultural land markets.
    • Innovations in supply chain management, be it automated grain silos or state-of-art herd management will not only optimise the use of resources but also bring in traceability of farms and animals, early monitoring and prevention of disease outbreaks, and contain value chain losses.

    How to manage financial resources?

    • Rationalise urea subsidy: It should rationalise its fertiliser subsidy regime by moving towards cash transfers on a per hectare basis and free up fertiliser prices.
    • Include urea in nutrient-based subsidy scheme: If that’s not possible, then urea should be included in the nutrient-based subsidy scheme.
    • Bring soluble fertiliser under subsidy: Bring soluble fertilisers under subsidy, which will enhance fertiliser use efficiency through fertigation.
    • This will also help reap environmental gains.
    • Rationalise food subsidy: Food subsidy can also be rationalised through direct cash transfers replacing PDS, as Punjab is a grain surplus state.

    Conclusion

    Both environmental and financial sustainability concerns related to business-as-usual farming in Punjab call for a rebooting strategy.

    UPSC 2022 countdown has begun! Get your personal guidance plan now! (Click here)

  • India-China trade crossed $125 bn in 2021

    India’s trade with China in 2021 crossed $125 billion, with imports from China nearing a record $100 billion, underlining continued demand for a range of Chinese goods, particularly machinery.

    Note: India-China trade has always been an all-time contested issue. This newscard presents crucial stats which is essential to substantiate your answers in Mains as well as in Interviews.

    Highlights of the bilateral trade

    • Bilateral trade reached $125.6 billion in 2021, with India’s imports from China accounting for $97.5 billion.
    • Trade fell from $92.8 billion in 2019 to $87.6 billion in 2020 on account of the pandemic.
    • Trade has boomed in 2021 thanks to a recovery in demand as well as rising imports of new categories of goods such as medical supplies.
    • Also, note that these figures exclude bilateral trade between India and Hong Kong.

    Imports-Exports imbalance

    • Imports were higher by 30% from 2019 while India’s exports to China, amounting to $28.1 billion, were up by as much as 56% from two years earlier.
    • The trade deficit last year reached $69.4 billion, up by 22% from the pre-pandemic figure in 2019.
    • While a break-up of imports and exports wasn’t immediately available, India’s biggest exports to China in recent years were iron ore, cotton, and other raw material-based commodities.
    • India has imported large quantities of electrical and mechanical machinery, active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs), auto components, and over the past two years, a range of medical supplies from oxygen concentrators to PPEs.

    A global comparison

    • The 43% year-on-year growth in bilateral trade with India was among the highest that China recorded with its major trading partners.
    • Trade figures with China’s top three trading partners showed growth of 28.1% with ASEAN (to $878.2 billion), 27.5% with the EU (to $828.1 billion), and 28.7% with the US, (to $755.6 billion).

    Back2Basics: India-China Bilateral Trade

    • China is India’s largest trading partner.
    • Major commodities exported from India to China were: cotton; gems, precious metals, coins; copper; ores, slag, ash; organic chemicals; salt, sulphur, stone, cement; machines, engines, pumps.
    • Major commodities imported from China into India were: electronic equipment; machines, engines, pumps; organic chemicals; fertilizers; iron and steel; plastics; iron or steel products; gems, precious metals, coins; ships, boats; medical, technical equipment.

     

    UPSC 2022 countdown has begun! Get your personal guidance plan now! (Click here)

  • Taxing cryptocurrency transactions

    Context

    Notwithstanding the eventual introduction of the Cryptocurrency and Regulation of Official Digital Currency Bill in Parliament, cryptocurrencies continue to proliferate.

    Provisions in Income Tax Act 1961 to tax cryptocurrencies

    • Cryptocurrencies not mentioned in Income Tax Act, 1961: Although the Income Tax Act, 1961 (“IT Act”) does not specifically mention cryptocurrencies, it does cast a wide enough net to bring crypto transactions under its ambit.
    • Capital asset: Trading in cryptocurrency may be classified as transfer of a ‘capital asset’, taxable under the head ‘capital gains.
    • Business income: If such cryptocurrencies are held as stock-in trade and the taxpayer is trading in them frequently, the same will attract tax under the head ‘business income’.
    • Even if one argues that crypto transactions do not fall under the above heads, Section 56 of the IT Act shall come into play, making them taxable under the head ‘Other sources of income’.

    Challenges in taxing cryptocurrencies

    • The above provisions in themselves are not sufficient in order to put in place a simple yet effective taxation regime for cryptocurrencies.

    [1] Varied interpretations:

    • First, the absence of explicit tax provisions has led to uncertainty and varied interpretations being adopted in relation to mode of computation, applicable tax head and tax rates, loss and carry forward, etc.
    • For instance, the head of income under which trading of self generated cryptocurrency (currencies which are created by mining, acquired by air drop, etc.) is to be taxed is unclear.
    • Since there is no consistency in the rates provided by the crypto-exchanges, it is difficult to arrive at a fair market value.
    • Similarly, when a person receives cryptocurrency as payment for rendering goods or services, how should one arrive at the value of the said currency and how should such a transaction be taxed?

    [2] Identifying tax jurisdiction

    • It is often tricky to identify the tax jurisdiction for crypto transactions as taxpayers may have engaged in multiple transfers across various countries and the cryptocurrencies may have been stored in online wallets, on servers outside India.

    [3] The anonymity of taxpayer

    • The identities of taxpayers who transact with cryptocurrencies remain anonymous.
    • Exploiting this, tax evaders have been using crypto transactions to park their black money abroad and fund criminal activities, terrorism, etc.

    [4] Lack of third party information on crypto transaction

    • The lack of third party information on crypto transactions makes it difficult to scrutinise and identify instances of tax evasion.
    • One of the most efficient enforcement tools in the hands of Income Tax Department is CASS or ‘computer aided scrutiny selection’ of assessments, where returns of taxpayers are selected inter alia based on information gathered from third party intermediaries such as banks.
    • However, crypto-market intermediaries like the exchanges, wallet providers, network operators, miners, administrators are unregulated and collecting information from them is very difficult.

    [5]  Physical goods/services may change hand in return for cryptocurrencies

    • Even if the crypto-market intermediaries are regulated and follow Know Your Customer (KYC) norms, there remains a scenario, where physical cash or other goods/services may change hands in return for cryptocurrencies.
    • Such transactions are hard to trace and only voluntary disclosures from the parties involved or a search/survey operation may reveal the tax evaders.

    Steps need to be taken

    • Statutory provision: The income-tax laws pertaining to the crypto transactions need to be made clear by incorporating detailed statutory provisions.
    • Awareness generation: This should be followed by extensive awareness generation among the taxpayers regarding the same.
    • Separate mandatory disclosure: The practice of having separate mandatory disclosure requirements in tax returns (as is the case in the United States) should be placed on the taxpayers as well as all the intermediaries involved, so that crypto transactions do not go unreported.
    • Strengthen international legal framework: Additionally, the existing international legal framework for exchange of information should be strengthened to enable collecting and sharing of information on crypto-transactions.
    • This will go a long way in linking the digital profiles of cryptocurrency holders with their real identities.
    • Training tax officers: the Government must impart training to its officers in blockchain technology.
    • The United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime’s ‘Cybercrime and Anti-Money Laundering’ Section (UNODC CMLS) has developed a unique cryptocurrency training module, which can aid in equipping tax officers with requisite understanding of the underlying technologies.

    Consider the question “What are the provision in Income Tax Act 1961 to tax the cryptocurrencies? What are the challenges in taxing cryptocurrencies? “

    Conclusion

    It is certain that cryptocurrencies are here to stay. A streamlined tax regime will be essential in the formulation of a clear, constructive and adaptive regulatory environment for cryptocurrencies.

    UPSC 2022 countdown has begun! Get your personal guidance plan now! (Click here)

  • MSP is necessary to make farming viable

    Context

    There has been debate on the issue of MSP with some arguing against it while some favouring it.

    The issues with MSP

    • The broad strands of argument against MSP are:
    • MSP hinders the price discovery: Providing MSP does not allow the market to discover the prices; if market cleared prices are less than MSP, then the only buyer would be the government; this would render the government bankrupt.
    • FPO as a mechanism to deal with markets: If markets have any distortions, the way to negotiate it is through Farmer Producer Organisations (FPOs) — as demonstrated by Amul.
    • Provide income support through DBT: A better way to address the possible income gap is to give an income support-based direct benefit transfer (DBT).

    Why MSP is necessary?

    1] Barriers in agri-markets

    • Through tariffs and other measures, we have built a national barrier on markets, where gates are opened on the basis of strategic intent.
    • If we were to open our borders for free movement of grains from elsewhere, we may even argue for unlocking agricultural land for more lucrative purposes without worrying about food self-sufficiency, buffer stocking and domestic food safety.
    • We may have to accept a national food safety for at least the essential foodgrains and pulses.

    2] Role of MSP as price signalling and why it needs to be given as legal guarantee

    • Disproportionate risk: If we were to look at farming, we realise that this exposes itself to disproportionate risks. 
    •  First, there is no stop-loss mechanism after sowing the seed, except for destroying the crop for the season.
    • This enterprise not only has the usual business risks but also has the enhanced risk of the force majeure elements that destroy the enterprise — a sudden hail storm, drought, unseasonal showers, a pest attack, a locust attack — there are too many things that the farmer cannot control.
    • Therefore, an MSP provides a powerful signal to the farmer to exercise the choice of sowing a particular crop because the farmer can back-calculate the expected margin.
    •  If MSP is a signal that helps the farmer to choose a crop, then it must remain a choice at the harvest time as well.
    • The significance of MSP is only when the markets do not clear the price.
    • In such a situation, the farmer gets a return less than the MSP and by this argument we are escorting the farm fraternity towards bankruptcy.
    • A legal guarantee is, therefore, needed.
    • The argument that the state will have to procure all the floating stock in the market and may become bankrupt is fallacious.
    • The intervention of the state in the markets usually covers information asymmetry, arbitrage and cools the markets when they get overheated.

    3] Why not opt for income support instead of MSP?

    •  Income support does not address the issue of viability of the farming operations.
    • There is no doubt that we need to make farming viable.
    •  It is important to address the prices of each crop as a strategic signalling mechanism: For crops that would be encouraged and those that would be discouraged.

    4] Issues with drawing parallels with AMUL

    •  While the Amul model recognised the inherent power of markets, it took about five decades to make the system competitive — the investments were made in breed improvement, free veterinary services, better cattle feed, capital subsidy for processing plants, and return-free capital as investments.
    • The nature of subsidies was smart and innovative.
    • Dairying was the last bit to be liberalised, and it enjoyed protection even when we opened up in 1991.

    Way forward

    • Modernise the markets: We need to modernise the markets and storage and processing facilities.
    • There is no point in conflating modernisation with liberalisation.
    • Investment: If we need to take Indian agriculture on the path of Amul, we need to start making those investments now.

    Consider the question “What are the objectives of providing MSP? How legal basis to MSP could help in making agriculture viable in India?”

    Conclusion

    Let us use the MSP framework smartly on diversified crops, on a decentralised basis while we develop the markets. A legal guarantee will only assure the farmers that they will not be bankrupted.

    UPSC 2022 countdown has begun! Get your personal guidance plan now! (Click here)

  • A new form of socialism powered by cooperative economic enterprises is required

    Context

    Inequalities of wealth have increased around the world and India is becoming one of the world’s most unequal countries.

    Role of globalisation and privatisation in increasing economic distress

    • Economic despair is feeding the rise of authoritarianism, nationalism, and identity politics.
    • Role of Globalisation: Opening national borders to free trade became an ideology in economics in the last 30 years.
    • Taxes of incomes and wealth at the top were also reduced.
    • The ideological justification was that the animal spirits of ‘wealth creators’ must not be dampened.
    • With higher taxes until the 1970s, the U.S. and many countries in Europe had built up their public health and education infrastructure and strengthened social security systems.
    • The rich are now being taxed much less than they were.
    • The pie has grown larger but the richest few have been eating, and hoarding, most of it themselves.
    • Role of privatisation: ‘Privatisation’ of everything became another ideological imperative in economics by the turn of the century.
    • Selling off public enterprises raises resources for funds-starved governments.
    • Another justification is efficiency in delivery of services, setting aside ethical questions of equity.
    • When ‘public’ is converted to ‘private’, rich people can buy what they need.
    • The gaps between the haves and the have-nots become larger.

    How liberal economic policies are creating illiberal societies

    • Liberal economists, promoting free markets, free trade, and privatisation, are worried by nationalism and authoritarian governments.
    • They rail against “populist” policies of governments that subsidise the poor and adopt industrial strategies for self-reliance and jobs for their citizens.
    • Liberals must re-examine their ideas of economics, to understand their own culpability in creating authoritarian and identitarian politics.

    The failure of capitalism and communism

    • While communism had lifted living standards, and the health and education of masses of poorer people faster than capitalism could, communism’s solution to the “property” question — that there should be no private property — was a failure.
    • It deprived people of personal liberties.
    • Capitalism’s solution to the property problem — replacing all publicly owned enterprises with privately owned ones (and reducing taxes on wealth and high incomes) has not worked either.
    • It has denied many of their basic human needs of health, education and social security, and equal opportunities for their children.
    • The private property solution has also harmed the natural environment.

    Way forward

    • Climate change and political rumblings around the world are both warnings that capitalism needs reform.
    • Economic policies must be based on new ideas.
    • Thought leaders and policymakers in India must lead the world out of the rut of ideas in which it seems to be trapped.
    • Principles of human rights must not be overpowered by property rights.
    • A new form of “Gandhian” democratic socialism, powered by cooperative economic enterprises, is required in the 21st century, to create wealth at the bottom, not only at the top, and save humanity and the planet.

    Conclusion

    A new form of ‘Gandhian’ democratic socialism powered by cooperative economic enterprises is required.

    UPSC 2022 countdown has begun! Get your personal guidance plan now! (Click here)