đŸ’„Join UPSC 2027,2028 Mentorship (July Batch) + XFactor Notes & Microthemes PDF
Talk to Mentor

Civilsdaily

Login

Subject: Economics

  • Why is there a push for Asset Monetization?

    Finance Minister has recently announced the framework for the National Monetization Pipeline (NMP) and its process is under discussion.

    What is Asset Monetization?

    • Asset Monetization involves the creation of new sources of revenue by unlocking of the value of hitherto unutilized or underutilized public assets.
    • Internationally, it is recognized that public assets are a significant resource for all economies.
    • Many public sector assets are sub-optimally utilized and could be appropriately monetized to create greater financial leverage and value for the companies and of the equity that the government has invested in them.
    • This helps in the accurate estimation of public assets which would help in the better financial management of government/public resources over time.

    What is the National Monetization Pipeline?

    • The NMP names a list of public assets that will be leased to private investors.
    • Only brown-field assets, which are assets that are already operational, are planned to be leased out under the NMP.
    • So, to give an example, an airport that is already operational may be leased out to an investor.
    • Assets that are yet to be developed, such as an undeveloped piece of land, for example, may not be leased out.
    • Importantly, there won’t be any transfer of ownership from the government to the private sector when assets are leased out.
    • The government only plans to cede control over its assets for a certain period of time, after which the assets must be returned to the government unless the lease is extended.

    Will NMP help the economy?

    • Better control and utilization: Economists generally believe that scarce assets are better managed and allocated by the private sector than by the government. So to the extent that the NMP frees assets from government control, it can help the economy.
    • Freeing Capital: The government believes that leasing out public assets to private investors will help free capital that is stuck in these assets.
    • Infra generation: The government can use this money, in turn, to build fresh infrastructure under the National Infrastructure Pipeline (NIP).
    • Economic boost: In fact, the proceeds from the NMP are expected to account for about 14% of the total outlay for infrastructure under the NIP. The government believes all this spending will boost economic activity.
    • A perfect model: Analysts also believe that the government has now through the NMP found the right model for infrastructure development.
    • Source of finance: The government, they say, is best suited to tackle the ground-level challenges in building infrastructure, while the private sector can operate and offer indirect finance to these projects through the NMP.

    For example, say the government has invested thousands of crores in a road project. It may take the government decades to recover its investment through the annual toll revenues.  Instead, the government can recover a good chunk of its investment by leasing out the right to collect toll for the next 30 years to a private investor.

    What are the risks?

    • Political lobbying: The allocation of assets owned by governments to private investors is often subject to political influence, which can lead to corruption. In fact, many in the Opposition allege that the NMP will favour a few business corporations that are close to the government.
    • Burden of opportunity cost: The expected boost to economic activity due to higher government spending may also need to be weighed against the opportunity costs. For one, the money that the government collects by leasing out assets comes from the pockets of the private sector. So higher government spending will come at the cost of lower private spending.
    • Legal uncertainties: The NMP also does not address the various structural problems such as legal uncertainty and the absence of a deep bond market that hold back private investment in infrastructure.
    • Sheer Privatization: There are also concerns that the leasing of airports, railways, roads and other public utilities to private investors could lead to higher prices for consumers. If the government merely cedes control of public utilities to private companies without taking steps to foster greater competition, it can indeed lead to poor outcomes for consumers.
    • Policy compulsion: The government’s past disinvestment projects such as the sale of Air India did not catch the fancy of investors owing to the stringent conditions set by the government. In the case of Air India’s sale, the buyers were supposed to possess a certain minimum net worth and stay invested in the airline for at least three years.

    What lies ahead?

    • The success of the NMP will depend on the demand for brown-field government assets among private investors.
    • Many analysts also believed that the government was expecting buyers to pay too much for a debt-ridden Air India.
    • The pricing of assets and the terms of sale will thus determine the level of interest that private investors show for assets leased under the NMP.
    • In the past, doubts have been raised about the allocation of airports and other assets to certain private business groups (say Adani Group).
    • So the process that the government adopts this time to allocate assets may come under scrutiny. There is likely to be a demand for an open, competitive auction of assets.

    UPSC 2022 countdown has begun! Get your personal guidance plan now! (Click here)

  • Agrarian reforms should go beyond meeting demands of the agitating farmers

    Context

    The farmers’ agitation in India has attracted worldwide attention and support.

    Story of land reforms in India

    • Being a state subject, various states implemented reforms with varying degrees of effectiveness and equity.
    • Objectives: The objectives were the same: Abolition of feudal landlordism, conferment of ownership on tenants, fixing land ceilings, distribution of surplus land, increasing agricultural productivity and production, etc.
    • However, owing to manipulations in land records, much surplus land was not available for distribution among the landless tillers.
    • Less than one per cent of the total land in the country was declared as surplus.
    • The relevant criteria for land entitlement should have been employment and main source of income.

    Change in social structure after land reforms

    • The ex-tenants, after getting land made use of several programmes —Green Revolution technology, bank nationalisation and priority sector lending, urbanisation and expanding urban markets.
    • They cornered a disproportionate share of various subsidies.
    • The tenant-turned-capitalist farmers formed political parties, which produced strong state-level leaders, who controlled state-level planning, fiscal policies and politics.
    • In place of a strong Centre and weak states, came a weak Centre and strong states.
    • Rich farmers have formed strong power blocs, with unquestioned clout and bargaining power, not only in north-western India but also in states like Maharashtra.

    Need for agrarian reforms

    • Farmers are seeking legal safeguards against market fluctuations, especially against any downward pressure on agricultural prices.
    • While they welcome every rise in prices, they demand legal protection against price falls, a legitimate stance.
    • Even as agricultural prosperity must be promoted,it should not be just shared between farmers (especially rich ones) and urban consumers, but by all.
    • Farm workers, in particular, must benefit from it.

    Reforms for farmworkers

    • Agricultural land should be pooled and equally distributed among farm households.
    • Non-farm households should not be permitted to hold farmland.
    • Land reforms should be a central subject; while agriculture can remain a state subject.
    • Such a programme will empower and enrich marginalised and excluded individuals and social groups.
    • It should be the kernel of a justiciable universal property right that must form an integral/inalienable part of Article 21 (Right to Life) of the Constitution.

    Conclusion

    The right to life is hollow without a right to livelihood. Through an effective land reforms programme, let’s build a prosperous India based on equity and justice.

    UPSC 2022 countdown has begun! Get your personal guidance plan now! (Click here)

  • Asset monetisation — execution is the key

    Context

    The government has announced an ambitious programme of asset monetisation. It hopes to earn â‚č6 trillion in revenues over a four-year period.

    About Asset monetisation

    • Unlike in privatisation, no sale of government assets is involved.
    • The government parts with its assets — such as roads, coal mines — for a specified period of time in exchange for a lump sum payment.
    • Asset monetisation will happen mainly in three sectors: roads, railways and power.
    • Other assets to be monetised include: airports, ports, telecom, stadiums and power transmission.
    • Two important statements have been made about the asset monetisation programme.
    • The focus will be on under-utilised assets.
    • Monetisation will happen through public-private partnerships (PPP) and Investment Trusts.

    Challenges

    1) Investors would prefer property utilised assets over underutilised assets

    • Suppose an asset is not being used adequately because it has not been properly developed or marketed well enough.
    • A private party may judge that it can put the assets to better use.
    • It will pay the government a price equal to the present value of cash flows at the current level of utilisation.
    • This is a win-win situation for the government and the private player.
    • The government gets a ‘fair’ value for its assets.
    • The private player gets its return on investment.
    • Increase in efficiency: The economy benefits from an increase in efficiency.
    • Monetising under-utilised assets thus has much to commend it.
    • However, in case of an asset that is being properly utilised, the private player has little incentive to invest and improve efficiency.
    • It simply needs to operate the assets as they are.
    • The private player may value the cash flows assuming a normal rate of growth.
    •  The cost of capital for a private player is higher than for a public authority.
    • The higher cost of capital for the private player could offset the benefit of any reduction in operating costs.
    • The government earns badly needed revenues but these could be less than what it might earn if it continued to operate the assets itself.
    • There is no improvement in efficiency.
    • The benefits to the economy are likely to be greater where under-utilised assets are monetised.
    • However, private players will prefer well-utilised assets to assets that are under-utilised.
    • That is because, in the former, cash flows and returns are more certain.

    2) Valuation challenges

    • It is very difficult to get the valuation right over a long-term horizon, say, 30 years.
    •  For a road or highway, growth in traffic would also depend on factors other than the growth of the economy.
    • . If the rate of growth of traffic turns out to be higher than assessed by the government in valuing the asset, the private operator will reap windfall gains.
    • Alternatively, if the winning bidder pays what turns out to be a steep price for the asset, it will raise the toll price steeply.
    • The consumer ends up bearing the cost.
    • It could be argued that a competitive auction process will address these issues and fetch the government the right price while yielding efficiency gains.
    • But that assumes, among other things, that there will be a large number of bidders for the many assets that will be monetised.

    3) Life of the returned asset may not be long

    • There is no incentive for the private player to invest in the asset towards the end of the tenure of monetisation.
    • The life of the asset, when it is returned to the government, may not be long.
    • In that event, asset monetisation virtually amounts to sale.
    • Monetisation through the PPP route is thus fraught with problems.

    Way forward: InvIT route

    • Infrastructure Investment Trusts (InvIT) are mutual fund-like vehicles in which investors can subscribe to units that give dividends.
    •  Monetisable assets will be transferred to InvITs.
    • The sponsor of the Trust is required to hold a minimum prescribed proportion of the total units issued.
    • InvITs offer a portfolio of assets, so investors get the benefit of diversification.
    • In the InvIT route to monetisation, the public authority continues to own the rights to a significant portion of the cash flows and to operate the assets.
    • So, the issues that arise with transfer of assets to a private party — such as incorrect valuation or an increase in price to the consumer — are less of a problem.

    Key takeaways

    • Low cost of capital for public authority: In general, due to the low cost of capital for public authority, the economy is best served when public authorities develop infrastructure and monetise these.
    • InvIT route: Monetisation through InvITs is likely to prove less of a problem than the PPP route.
    • Monetise under utilised assets: We are better off monetising under-utilised assets than assets that are well utilised.
    • Monitoring authority should be set up: To ensure proper execution, there is a case for independent monitoring of the process.
    • The government may set up an Asset Monetisation Monitoring Authority staffed by competent professionals.

    Consider the question “How asset monetisation is different from privatisation? What are the challenges in asset monetisation? Suggest the ways forward.”

    Conclusion

    Government must pay attention to the challenges in asset monetisation and use it in the proper way to increase the efficiency in the economy.

    UPSC 2022 countdown has begun! Get your personal guidance plan now! (Click here)

  • Govt’s clarifications on CSR Expenditure

    The Ministry of Corporate Affairs has clarified that companies have to ensure that funds transferred to implementing agencies are actually utilized for them to be counted towards mandatory CSR expenditure.

    What is Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR)?

    • CSR is a type of business self-regulation that aims to contribute to the societal goals of a philanthropic, activist, or charitable nature by engaging in or supporting volunteering or ethically-oriented practices.
    • It rests on the ideology of “give and take” i.e. to take scarce resources from the environment for running a business, and in turn to contribute towards economic, social, and environmental development.

    CSR in India

    • India is the first country in the world to make corporate social responsibility (CSR) mandatory, following an amendment to the Companies Act, 2013 in April 2014.
    • Businesses can invest their profits in areas such as education, poverty, gender equality, and hunger as part of any CSR compliance.

    All companies with a net worth of Rs 500 crore or more, a turnover of Rs 1,000 crore or more, or net profit of Rs 5 crore or more, are required to spend 2 per cent of their average profits of the previous three years on CSR activities every year.

    What is the recent clarification?

    • The MCA has clarified that excess Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) expenditure prior to FY21 cannot be set off against future CSR expenditure requirements.
    • Corporate donations to government schemes cannot be counted as CSR.
    • The ministry has also clarified that companies have to ensure that funds transferred to implementing agencies are actually utilized for them to be counted towards mandatory CSR expenditure.

    Impact of the move

    • This clarification may impact donations to state government schemes which are often done for the sake of managing relationships with the government.

    Earlier changes

    UPSC 2022 countdown has begun! Get your personal guidance plan now! (Click here)

  • [pib] Bharat Series (BH-series) for Vehicles

    The Ministry of Road Transport & Highways has rolled out a new series for vehicles registration ‘BH’ to avoid re-registration of vehicles while moving to another state.

    Bharat series (BH-series)

    • There was a procedure of re-registration of a vehicle while moving to another state.
    • A vehicle bearing BH registration mark shall not require assignment of a new registration mark when the owner of the vehicle shifts from one State to another.
    • Format of Bharat series (BH-series) Registration Mark –

    Registration Mark Format:

    1. YY BH #### XX
    2. YY – Year of first registration
    3. BH- Code for Bharat Series
    4. ####- 0000 to 9999 (randomized)
    5. XX- Alphabets (AA to ZZ)

    Why such move?

    • Station relocation occurs with both Government and private sector employees.
    • Such movements create a sense of unease in the minds of such employees with regard to transfer of registration from the parent state to another state.
    • Under section 47 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, a person is allowed to keep the vehicle for not more than 12 months in any state other than the state where the vehicle is registered.

    Who can get this BH series?

    • BH-series will be available on voluntary basis to Defense personnel, employees of Central Government/ State Government/ Central/ State PSUs and private sector companies/organizations.
    • The motor vehicle tax will be levied for two years or in multiple of two.
    • This scheme will facilitate free movement of personal vehicles across States/UTs of India upon relocation to a new State/UT.
    • After completion of the fourteenth year, the motor vehicle tax shall be levied annually which shall be half of the amount which was charged earlier for that vehicle.

    UPSC 2022 countdown has begun! Get your personal guidance plan now! (Click here)

  • How to read the state of the economy

    Context

    GDP growth estimates range from a high of 11 per cent, as per the government, to 9.5 per cent as per RBI. The variation is stark. So, what should one look at to evaluate the state of the economy?

    Things to consider while evaluating the economy

    • First, since the economy contracted by 7.3 per cent in 2020-21, all numbers will be exaggerated in the upward direction.
    • Second, beware of interpretations based on single-month data.
    • Cumulative numbers are better at times, but can be misleading too.
    • Third, what is more important is how things will play out during September-December as this is the festival-cum-harvest season which engenders spending normally.
    • Several indicators are used as leading signals of the economy, but here, too, we need to be careful.
    • PMIs for manufacturing and services tell us if we are better off than the previous month.
    • But that is not how data is normally presented as we usually talk of year-on-year growth.
    • But it is an early signal for sure. The IIP and core sector numbers will be influenced by base numbers and come with a lag.

    Indicators to look at as signs of recovery

    • Credit growth: Bank credit is a good indicator of whether companies are producing more as all activity requires working capital.
    • Here, the picture is not good as growth is (-) 0.4 per cent as of July end, indicating that activity has not picked up yet.
    •  Therefore, credit growth is in the negative territory.
    • Investment:  Debt issuances are lower in the first four months at around Rs 1.25 lakh crore, which is half of the Rs 2.57 lakh crore mobilised last year.
    • Therefore, the investment scenario is still one where companies are watchful.
    • There is surplus capacity in industry with utilisation rate being at 69.4 per cent in March 2021.
    • Rural demand: Rural demand is an integral part of the story and presently progress on the kharif crop is satisfactory.
    • A good crop is also necessary to generate spending power besides augmenting supplies in the market as well as food processing industry.
    • The second wave has pushed back rural households with more expenditure on health care.
    • Employment generation: Employment generation is a trigger for higher income and spending and while the battle between CMIE and EPFO data remains unresolved, the market will finally reveal if people have more money.

    Inflation concern

    • Inflation is high and though there is a view that it is transient.
    • Several households, who are living on a fixed income have witnessed a double whammy in the form of lower returns on deposits and cumulative inflation of 6 per cent last year, and a similar number this year.

    Conclusion

    Investment will trail consumption and while the Centre has a good capex plan, it is only one piece in the overall puzzle. The private sector must get involved and with the banks being hesitant, the road can get longer.

    UPSC 2022 countdown has begun! Get your personal guidance plan now! (Click here)

  • Liberalized Drone Rules, 2021

    The central government has notified the Drone Rules 2021, a much more liberalised regime for unmanned aircraft systems than what existed previously.

    Key features of Drone Rules 2021

    These rules are built on a premise of trust, self-certification and non-intrusive monitoring. The policy is designed to usher in an era of super-normal growth while balancing safety and security considerations.

    • Several approvals abolished: Unique authorisation number, unique prototype identification number, certificate of manufacturing and airworthiness, certificate of conformance, certificate of maintenance, import clearance, acceptance of existing drones, operator permit, authorisation of R&D organisation, student remote pilot licence, remote pilot instructor authorisation, drone port authorisation etc.
    • Number of forms reduced: from 25 to 5.
    • Types of fees: reduced from 72 to 4.
    • Quantum of fee: reduced to nominal levels and delinked with size of drone. For instance, the fee for a remote pilot license fee has been reduced from INR 3000 (for large drone) to INR 100 for all categories of drones; and is valid for 10 years.
    • Digital sky platform: It shall be developed as a user-friendly single-window system. There will be minimal human interface and most permissions will be self-generated.
    • Interactive airspace map: with green, yellow and red zones shall be displayed on the digital sky platform within 30 days of publication of these rules.
    • No permission required in green zones: Green zone means the airspace upto a vertical distance of 400 feet or 120 metre that has not been designated as a red zone or yellow zone in the airspace map; and the airspace upto a vertical distance of 200 feet or 60 metre above the area located between a lateral distance of 8 and 12 kilometre from the perimeter of an operational airport.
    • De-licensing: No remote pilot licence required for micro drones (for non-commercial use) and nano drones. No requirement for security clearance before issuance of any registration or licence. Nano and model drones (made for research or recreation purposes) are exempt from type certification.
    • Foreign ownership: No restriction on foreign ownership in Indian drone companies.
    • Import: Import of drones to be regulated by DGFT. Requirement of import clearance from DGCA abolished.
    • Size of drones: Coverage of drones under Drone Rules, 2021 increased from 300 kg to 500 kg. This will cover drone taxis also.
    • Testing of drones: for issuance of Type Certificate to be carried out by Quality Council of India or authorised testing entities.
    • UID: Manufacturers and importers may generate their drones’ unique identification number on the digital sky platform through the self-certification route. Drones present in India on or before 30 Nov 2021 will be issued a unique identification number through the digital sky platform provided, they have a DAN, a GST-paid invoice and are part of the list of DGCA-approved drones.
    • Penalties: Maximum penalty for violations reduced to INR 1 lakh.
    • Permission: Safety and security features like ‘No permission – no takeoff’ (NPNT), real-time tracking beacon, geo-fencing etc. to be notified in future. A six-month lead time will be provided to the industry for compliance.
    • Drone corridors: will be developed for cargo deliveries.
    • Drone promotion council: to be set up by Government with participation from academia, startups and other stakeholders to facilitate a growth-oriented regulatory regime.

    UPSC 2022 countdown has begun! Get your personal guidance plan now! (Click here)

  • A way of diluting credit discipline

    Context

    Some bank borrowers have gone to court demanding that it quash the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) circular dated August 6, 2020 on opening current accounts.

    Background

    • Current accounts with non-lending banks are an important channel for diversion.
    • Diversion of funds is a major reason for large non-performing assets (NPAs).
    • Internal diversion is for non-priority purposes and funds can also be diverted to other firms, owned or controlled by the same group, friends or relatives.
    • To prevent this, the RBI mandates a No-Objection Certificate (NOC) from lending banks before opening such accounts.
    • Banks should verify with CRILC, the RBI credit database, and inform lenders. Banks should also obtain a NOC from the drawee bank when an account is opened through cheques.
    • Widespread non-compliance with mandated safeguards forced the RBI to bar non-lending banks from opening current accounts for large borrowers.
    • Thus, if borrowing is through a cash credit or overdraft account, no bank can open a current account.

    What are the current regulations?

    • If a borrower has no cash credit or overdraft account, a current account can be opened subject to restrictions.
    • If the bank’s exposure is less than 10% of total borrowings, debits to the account can only be for transfers to accounts with a designated bank.
    • If total borrowing is â‚č50 crore or more, there should be an escrow mechanism managed by one bank which alone can open a current account.
    • Other lending banks can open ‘collection accounts’ from which funds will be periodically transferred to the escrow account.
    • If the borrowing is between â‚č5 crore and â‚č50 crore, lending banks can open current accounts.
    • Non-lending banks can open collection accounts.
    • If borrowing is below â‚č5 crore, even non-lending banks can open current accounts.
    • The working capital credit should be bifurcated into loan and cash credit components at individual bank levels.

    Issues with regulations

    • If a borrower has an overdraft, how can there not be a current account?
    • An overdraft is the right to overdraw in a current account up to a limit.
    • The second issue is that the circular forecloses such operational flexibility.
    • Third, why should a bank with low exposure transfer funds to another bank when it can use it to adjust other dues with it?
    • Fourth, share in borrowing is not static. Crossing the threshold both ways could happen often.
    • Fifth, there is a mismatch between what a borrower needs and the regulations allow.
    • Support of non-lending banks through current accounts in other banks is required for large accounts.
    • Sixth, transactions in an active current account enables a bank to monitor a borrower’s account, however small.
    • The lack of such control was why large development financial institutions of yesteryear built up huge NPAs.
    • Seventh, the regulation mandates splitting working capital into loan and cash credit components across all banks.
    • Such a one-size-fits-all regulation does not factor in the purpose of the different facilities.
    • A large company might avail itself of loans in Mumbai, but require current accounts with another bank in Assam where it might have a factory.
    • Lack of flexibility: Rules are not flexible, do not provide for unforeseen circumstances, and can be easily circumvented.
    • Use more generic terms: Regulation needs to use more generic terms. Terms such as Working Capital Term Loan might mean different things in different banks.
    • Diversion of fund is risk better dealt by banks: Is it not better to leave management of exceptional risks such as diversion of funds to the banks?
    • The cost of regulation: the costs of regulation be justified by the benefits.

    Conclusion

    When regulation ignores market practices, it lacks legitimacy, a construct from neo-institutionalist literature. When legitimacy is wanting, compliance suffers.

    UPSC 2022 countdown has begun! Get your personal guidance plan now! (Click here)

  • Mandatory rice fortification policy should be re-examined

    Context

    To deal with the high prevalence of anaemia, the government has been pursuing the policy of food fortification with iron. This policy needs a rethink.

    Rice-fortification policy

    • There are high levels of anaemia in India, affecting women and children equally.
    • This is despite the corrective measures like mandatory supplementation of iron tablets through Anaemia Mukt Bharat programme of pharmaceutical iron supplementation.
    • To deal with the issue, the government has decided on compulsory rice fortification in safety-net feeding programmes like the ICDS, PDS and school mid-day meals.
    • This was announced by the Prime Minister in his recent Independence Day address to the nation.
    • The mandatory rice fortification programme is being piloted in some districts already.
    • Food fortification is considered attractive as it requires no behavioural modification by the beneficiary.

    Why iron fortification policy needs re-examination?

    1) Over-estimation of anaemia burden

    • High WHO cutoff for Hg levels: WHO haemoglobin cut-offs are used to diagnose anaemia in India.
    • There is a growing global consensus that these may be too high.
    • A recent Lancet paper suggested a lower haemoglobin cut-off level to diagnose anaemia in Indian children.
    • Using this will actually reduce the anaemia burden by two-thirds.
    • Capillary Vs venous blood sample: Haemoglobin level can be falsely low when a capillary blood sample (taken by finger-prick) is used for measurement, instead of the more reliable venous blood sample (taken with a syringe from an arm vein). The anaemia burden in India is estimated from capillary blood, which inflates the anaemia burden substantially.
    • If the recommended venous blood sample is used, it would halve this burden.
    • There is, thus, a significant overestimation of anaemia burden.

    2) Other nutrients and protein intake

    • A MoHFW national survey (Comprehensive National Nutrition Survey) of Indian children showed that iron deficiency was related to less than half the anaemia cases.
    • Many other nutrients and adequate protein intake are also important, for which a good diverse diet is required.

    3) Iron requirement over-estimated

    • The idea for iron fortification comes from the premise that a normal Indian diet cannot possibly meet an individual’s daily iron requirement.
    • This is wrong thinking, and is based on older iron requirements (as per National Institute of Nutrition [NIN] 2010), which were much too high.
    • The latest corrected iron requirements (NIN 2020) are 30-40 per cent lower.
    • The iron density of the Indian vegetarian diet, about 9 mg/1000 kCal, can thus meet most requirements.

    4) Challenges in rice fortification

    • Rice fortification is very complex.
    • It requires a fortified rice “kernel” or grain that is composed of rice flour paste, along with the required concentration of micronutrients and binders, extruded into a grain that exactly matches the shape of the rice it is intended to fortify.
    • The problem lies in making “matching” kernels for each rice cultivar that is distributed in the food safety-net programmes from year to year and state to state.
    • If it does not match, the instinct of a home cook will be to pick out and discard the odd grains, thereby defeating the purpose of fortification.

    Risks involved

    • Ingesting fortified salt (two teaspoons, 10 g/day) or rice (quarter kilo/day) will deliver an additional 10 mg iron/day each to the diet.
    • When the iron intake exceeds 40 mg/day, the risk of toxicity goes up.
    • The unabsorbed iron that remains in the gut can wreak havoc among the beneficial bacteria in the large intestine.
    • Iron causes oxidative stress, and more seriously, is implicated in diabetes and cancer risk. Men will also be more at risk.

    Way forward

    • We just need to absorb the existing dietary iron better and complement this with all the other nutrients that are required, by eating a diverse diet (with fruits and vegetables, for example), and improving our environment.
    • Indeed, it is well-known that the benefits derived from the nutrients in whole foods are greater than the sum of their parts.

     Conclusion

    We need to rethink our reductionist strategies if we are to deliver food and nutrition security to our people.

    UPSC 2022 countdown has begun! Get your personal guidance plan now! (Click here)

  • The dangers of India’s palm oil push

    Context

    On August 15, Prime Minister Narendra Modi announced a support of Rs 11,000 crore to incentivise oil palm production.

    National Mission on Edible Oils and Oil Palm (NMEO-OP)

    • Under NMEO-OP, the government intends to bring an additional 6.5 lakh hectares under oil palm cultivation.
    • The agro-business industry has said the move will help its growth and reduce the country’s dependence on palm oil imports, especially from Indonesia and Malaysia.
    • Indonesia has emerged as a significant palm oil hub in the last decade and has overtaken Malaysia.
    • The two countries produce 80 per cent of global oil palm.
    • Indonesia exports more than 80 per cent of its production.

    Reducing the import dependence

    • India imported 18.41 million tonnes of vegetable oil in 2018.
    • The National Mission on Oilseeds and Oil Palm are part of the government’s efforts to reduce the dependence on vegetable oil production.
    • The Yellow Revolution of the 1990s led to a rise in oilseeds production.
    • Though there has been a continuous increase in the production of diverse oilseeds — groundnut, rapeseed and mustard, soybean — that has not matched the increasing demand.
    • Most of these oilseeds are grown in rain-fed agriculture areas of Gujarat, Andhra Pradesh, Haryana, Karnataka, Rajasthan, Madhya Pradesh, Tamil Nadu and Uttar Pradesh.

    Issues with oil palm cultivation in India

    • Impact on biodiversity: Studies on agrarian change in Southeast Asia have shown that increasing oil palm plantations is a major reason for the region’s declining biodiversity. 
    • The Northeast is recognised as the home of around 850 bird species, it is also home to citrus fruits, it is rich in medicinal plants and harbours rare plants and herbs.
    • Above all, it has 51 types of forests.
    • Studies conducted by the government have also highlighted the Northeast’s rich biodiversity.
    • The palm oil policy could destroy this richness of the region.
    • To preserve the environment and biodiversity, Indonesia and Sri Lanka have already started putting restrictions on palm tree plantation.
    • Water pollution: Along with adversely impacting the country’s biodiversity, it has led to increasing water pollution.
    • Climate change: The decreasing forest cover has significant implications with respect to increasing carbon emission levels and contributing to climate change.
    • Against the notion of self-reliance: Such initiatives are also against the notion of community self-reliance:
    • The initial state support for such a crop results in a major and quick shift in the existing cropping pattern that are not always in sync with the agro-ecological conditions and food requirements of the region.
    • Against commitment to sustainable agriculture: The policy also contradicts the government’s commitments under the National Mission for Sustainable Agriculture.
    • The mission aims at “Making agriculture more productive, sustainable, remunerative and climate resilient by promoting location specific integrated/composite farming systems.”
    • The palm oil mission, instead, aims at achieving complete transformation of the farming system of Northeast India.
    • Studies also show that in case of variations in global palm oil prices, households dependent on palm oil cultivation become vulnerable.

    Consider the question “India depend on import for its vegetable oil requirements to a larger extent. What are the steps taken by the government to reduce the dependence? Can oil palm cultivation in India be a solution?”

    Conclusion

    Similar environmental and political outcomes cannot be ruled out in India. Apart from the possible hazardous impacts in Northeast India, such trends could have negative implications on farmer incomes, health, and food security in other parts of the country in the long run.

    UPSC 2022 countdown has begun! Get your personal guidance plan now! (Click here)