💥Join UPSC 2027,2028 Mentorship (August Batch) + XFactor Notes & Microthemes PDF

Subject: Vaccines

  • Can a 100-Year-Old Vaccine Train the Brain’s Immune System?

    Why in the News

    A study gave two doses of the Bacillus Calmette Guerin vaccine a month apart to 23 older adults and tracked blood and cerebrospinal fluid for a year, finding monocytes switching on genes for a faster immune response. This is evidence of trained immunity operating within the central nervous system. The tension is between a cheap, decades old vaccine with a large safety record and a study too small to establish clinical benefit.

    Note: Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) vaccine is more than 100 years old. It was first given to a human on July 18, 1921. Two French scientists, Albert Calmette and Camille Guérin, made the vaccine to stop tuberculosis (TB).

    What is trained immunity?

    1. About: Trained immunity is the capacity of innate immune cells to mount a stronger response to a later, unrelated challenge after an initial exposure, through lasting changes in gene expression.
    2. How it differs from adaptive immunity: Adaptive immunity is pathogen specific and mediated by lymphocytes. Trained immunity is non specific and mediated by innate cells such as monocytes.
    3. Mechanism: The change operates through epigenetic and metabolic reprogramming rather than through antibody memory.
    4. Why BCG: BCG is the best documented inducer of trained immunity, which is why it is used to test the effect.

    What did the study actually find?

    1. Sample and design: 23 older adults were enrolled, roughly half with cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers of Alzheimer’s disease, given two BCG doses a month apart.
    2. Immune change: Monocytes switched on genes associated with a faster immune response.
    3. Functional test: Monocytes responded more strongly to lipopolysaccharide, a standard bacterial stimulus, confirming a functional and not merely transcriptional change.
    4. Amyloid movement: Amyloid fell in cerebrospinal fluid and rose in blood among participants without established Alzheimer’s, and not among those with it.
    5. Location of the effect: The change was detected in the central nervous system compartment, which is the finding’s principal claim.

    What are the study’s stated limits?

    1. Sample size: 23 participants is too small to detect a clinical effect.
    2. No control arm: The study had no placebo group, so observed changes cannot be separated from natural variation.
    3. No cognitive change: Cognitive scores were unchanged over the year.
    4. Directional ambiguity: Amyloid shifting from cerebrospinal fluid to blood is consistent with clearance and is not proof of clearance.

    Why does a cheap vaccine matter for this disease?

    1. Cost comparison: BCG is inexpensive and carries decades of safety data, against anti amyloid drugs that are expensive and require infusion infrastructure.
    2. Existing supply: BCG is already manufactured at scale for tuberculosis immunisation.
    3. Repurposing precedent: A five year BCG cohort in type 1 diabetes established the model of testing the vaccine for a non tuberculosis indication.
    4. Underlying hypothesis: Chronic low grade inflammation with ageing, described as inflammaging, is implicated in neurodegeneration, and trained immunity is one route to modulating it.

    Challenges in translating this finding

    1. Blood brain barrier access: Demonstrating that a peripheral vaccine changes central nervous system immunity requires invasive sampling. e.g. the cerebrospinal fluid collection this study depended on.
    2. Amyloid hypothesis contestation: Amyloid reduction has not reliably produced cognitive benefit. e.g. the modest clinical effect sizes reported for approved anti amyloid antibodies.
    3. Trial duration: Neurodegeneration progresses over years, so trials must run long. e.g. the five year design of the BCG type 1 diabetes cohort.
    4. Vaccine supply competition: Diverting BCG to a new indication competes with tuberculosis immunisation demand. e.g. periodic global BCG supply shortages affecting national immunisation programmes.
    5. Strain variability: BCG substrains differ in immunological potency, complicating replication. e.g. the differing efficacy estimates across BCG trials attributed to substrain variation.
    6. Diagnostic access: Identifying preclinical Alzheimer’s requires biomarker testing unavailable at scale in India. e.g. limited availability of cerebrospinal fluid and amyloid imaging assays outside tertiary centres.

    Conclusion

    The study’s contribution is the demonstration that trained immunity can be detected within the central nervous system, which extends a peripheral immunology concept into neurology. It establishes a mechanism, not a treatment, since 23 participants without a control arm and with unchanged cognition cannot support a clinical claim. The next milestone is a randomised controlled trial with a placebo arm and cognitive endpoints over a multi year horizon.

    Back2Basics: Bacillus Calmette Guerin vaccine

    1. A live attenuated vaccine derived from Mycobacterium bovis, first administered in humans in 1921.
    2. Used primarily against severe childhood forms of tuberculosis, including tuberculous meningitis and miliary tuberculosis.
    3. Included in India’s Universal Immunisation Programme, given at birth or as early as possible thereafter.
    4. Provides limited protection against pulmonary tuberculosis in adults, which is why a new tuberculosis vaccine remains a research priority.
    5. Also used as an intravesical immunotherapy for non muscle invasive bladder cancer.
    6. Manufactured in India at the BCG Vaccine Laboratory, Chennai, among other facilities.

    Government Initiatives

    1. National Tuberculosis Elimination Programme: Targets tuberculosis elimination, covering diagnosis, treatment and nutritional support for patients.
    2. Ni-kshay Poshan Yojana: Provides direct benefit transfer for nutritional support to tuberculosis patients on treatment.
    3. Universal Immunisation Programme: Provides BCG and other vaccines free of cost, targeting infants and pregnant women.
    4. National Programme for Health Care of the Elderly: Provides dedicated geriatric health services including cognitive and mental health care.
    5. Indian Council of Medical Research clinical trial network: Supports multicentre trials, including for tuberculosis vaccine candidates.

    Way Forward

    1. Run a controlled trial: Replicate the finding with a placebo arm and a sample large enough to detect a cognitive effect.
    2. Standardise the substrain: Fix the BCG substrain across trial sites so results are comparable.
    3. Protect immunisation supply: Ensure any repurposing trial does not draw on doses allocated to childhood tuberculosis immunisation.
    4. Expand biomarker capacity: Build cerebrospinal fluid and blood biomarker testing capacity so preclinical cases can be identified for trial enrolment.
    5. Fund domestic replication: Support an Indian cohort, since India carries both the largest BCG immunised population and a rapidly ageing one.

    “[2022, GS3, 15 marks] What is the basic principle behind vaccine development? How do vaccines work? What approaches were adopted by the Indian vaccine manufacturers to produce COVID-19 vaccines?”

  • Viruses don’t respect borders: the case for timely, fair global vaccine access for zoonotic outbreaks

    Why in the News?

    An International Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (ICGEB) scientist has argued that timely and fair global vaccine access for zoonotic outbreaks, such as Ebola, Nipah and hantavirus, requires academia-industry partnerships and a shared risk funding model. This is because such vaccines are not commercially attractive to manufacturers.

    Why are zoonotic outbreak vaccines commercially unattractive?

    1. Small, unpredictable markets: Ebola, Nipah and hantavirus outbreaks are episodic and geographically concentrated, giving manufacturers no stable, predictable market to justify sustained investment.
    2. High development cost, low return: Vaccine development costs remain similar regardless of market size, so a vaccine with a small addressable market offers manufacturers a poor return relative to vaccines for widespread diseases.
    3. Outbreak timing mismatch: Vaccine demand spikes only during an active outbreak, while development must happen years in advance, a mismatch that discourages manufacturers from investing ahead of demonstrated demand.

    What would a shared risk funding model change?

    1. Risk redistribution: A shared risk funding model spreads the financial risk of vaccine development across academia, industry and public funders, rather than leaving it entirely on a manufacturer’s commercial judgment.
    2. Academia-industry partnership: Academic institutions like ICGEB can carry early stage research risk, handing over a de-risked candidate for industry to scale, lowering the barrier for private investment.
    3. Access consequence: A funding model that does not depend on commercial viability alone can keep resulting vaccines priced for equitable global access rather than for cost recovery in a niche market.

    Conclusion

    The central idea is that zoonotic outbreak vaccines fail a commercial viability test that has nothing to do with their public health importance. A shared risk funding model, built on academia-industry partnership, is the mechanism proposed to close that gap between epidemic risk and market incentive.

    Back2Basics

    International Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (ICGEB): An intergovernmental organisation with a component in New Delhi, conducting research in genetic engineering and biotechnology, including vaccine and infectious disease research.

    PYQ Relevance

    [UPSC 2022] What is the basic principle behind vaccine development? How do vaccines work? What approaches were adopted by the Indian vaccine manufacturers to produce COVID-19 vaccines?

    Linkage: The PYQ examines the scientific principles of vaccine development and the challenges in developing vaccines for emerging infectious diseases. The article explains why vaccines for zoonotic diseases require shared-risk funding and academia-industry partnerships to overcome weak commercial incentives and ensure equitable access.

  • What is the basic principle behind vaccine development? How do vaccines work? What approaches were adopted by the Indian vaccine manufacturers to produce COVID-19 vaccines?

    Vaccines are biological preparations that provide immunity against infectious diseases by training the immune system to fight pathogens. India has emerged as a global vaccine hub, supplying over 60% of global vaccine demand through indigenous vaccine development.

    Basic Principle Behind Vaccine Development

    Mimicking natural infection: Vaccines imitate infections to safely activate the body’s immune defenses.

    Antigen as the key component: Vaccines contain antigens that trigger antibody production. These may include:

    Weakened or killed pathogens

    Pathogen fragments or genetic material

    Inactivated bacterial toxins (toxoids)

    Types of vaccine platform:

    Live-attenuated vaccines: Use weakened living pathogens, providing strong immunity but posing risks to immunocompromised individuals. Eg- MMR and Chickenpox vaccines.

    Non-live vaccines: Use killed pathogens or subunits, making them safer but requiring booster doses due to shorter immunity. Eg- DTaP vaccine.

    Addressing viral mutations: Vaccines for rapidly mutating viruses are periodically updated to maintain protection. Eg- Seasonal flu vaccines and COVID-19 boosters.

    How Vaccines Work?

    Immune system activation: Vaccine antigens are recognized as foreign threats, activating white blood cells to multiply and respond.

    Antibody production: White blood cells produce antibodies that specifically identify and neutralize the pathogen.

    Immunological memory: After the antigen is removed, memory cells remain in the body, providing long-term immunity.

    Protection against disease: On future exposure, memory cells rapidly produce antibodies, preventing severe illness or death.

    Approaches Adopted by Indian Vaccine Manufacturers for COVID-19

    Inactivated whole-virion platform (Covaxin): Bharat Biotech and Indian Council of Medical Research developed a vaccine using chemically inactivated SARS-CoV-2 virus to safely trigger immunity.

    Viral vector platform (Covishield): Serum Institute of India(SII) used a harmless chimpanzee adenovirus carrying spike protein genetic code to stimulate immune response.

    Recombinant protein subunit platform (Covovax & Corbevax): SII and Biological E developed vaccines using purified spike proteins with adjuvants to induce antibodies.

    DNA plasmid platform (ZyCoV-D): Zydus Cadila developed the world’s first human DNA vaccine using plasmid DNA delivered through a needle-free injector.

    mRNA platform (GEMCOVAC-19): Gennova Biopharmaceuticals developed an mRNA vaccine using lipid nanoparticles to deliver spike-protein instructions safely into cells.

    India’s diverse COVID-19 vaccine response-from inactivated vaccines to DNA and mRNA platforms-has strengthened its role as the Pharmacy of the World. Expanding indigenous R&D and ensuring timely immunization remain vital for achieving United Nations SDG 3(Good Health and Well-being)

  • What is the importance of using Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccines in India

    What is the importance of using Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccines in India?
    (1) These vaccines are effective against pneumonia as well as meningitis and sepsis.
    (2) Dependence on antibiotics that are not effective against drug-resistant bacteria can
    be reduced.
    (3) These vaccines have no side effects and cause no allergic reactions.
    Select the correct answer using the code given below:

  • With reference to recent developments regarding ‘Recombinant Vector Vaccine,’ consider the following statements

    With reference to recent developments regarding ‘Recombinant Vector Vaccine,’ consider the following statements:

    1. Genetic engineering is applied in the development of these vaccines.
    2. Bacteria and viruses are used as vectors.
    Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

  • In the context of vaccines manufactured to prevent COVID-19 pandemic, consider the following statements

    In the context of vaccines manufactured to prevent COVID-19 pandemic, consider the following statements :
    1. The Serum Institute of India produced COVID-19 vaccine named Covishield using mRNA platform.
    2. Sputnik V vaccine is manufactured using vector based platform.
    3. COVAXIN is an inactivated pathogen based vaccine.
    Which of the statements given above are correct?