Categories
Daily AWE

18th July 2019 | Daily Answer Writing Enhancement

Students are advised to post answers below in the main page itself. Kindly ensure that answer to each question is posted as a separate comment with the purchase ID provided by us.

Reviews will be provided in a week for. (In the order of submission- First come first serve basis). In case the answer is submitted late the review period may get extend to two weeks.

*In case your answer is not reviewed in a week, reply to your answer saying *NOT CHECKED*. If Parth Sir’s tag is available then tag him.  

For the philosophy of AWE and payment, check  here: Click2Join


Question 1)

Recent Farmers’ agitations and suicide once gain highlight the discrepancies in inclusive development. In this reference, analyze the factors behind famer’s suicide with a reference to NCRB report. What steps are needed to break the vicious cycle?

Question 2)

How can an efficient public transport system achieve dual objective of lower carbon emission and healthy population? Analyse.

Question 3)

KUSUM aims to provide energy sufficiency and sustainable irrigation access to farmers. How far has it been successful in achieving its objectives? Critically analyse.

Question 4)

You are professor as well as a social activist. There is an educated and well employed couple in your vicinity who often fight on their personal issues. One day they started fighting as usual, starting from arguments, turning loud, slamming doors and finally the male partner resorting to physical violence, the cry of wife and children started coming out. People come out, but do not dare to go to them citing that it is their personal matter, so any interference would be unethical and uncalled for. Answer the following questions based on the above case: (a) Would you agree to be a bystander on the advice of the people that it is a personal matter of the couple? Give reasons. (b) Suppose you go to the flat of the couple and enquire what is wrong but the male member insists that they be left on their own as it is their personal matter and you should mind your own business. What would be your reaction? (c) Can police help in curbing this social malady by using legal authority and provisions? (d) What is your moral and ethical locus standi on intervention of neighbours to stop the domestic violence?

 

By Root

Caretaker @civilsdaily

Subscribe
Notify of
67 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Ashok Reddy
1 year ago

MOJO9617700D58501398
Q1

Parth Verma
Editor
1 year ago
Reply to  Ashok Reddy

Hi Ashok
Good intro.
After intro, mention some of the stats from the NCRB report because its an important aspect of the question.
In the reasons, do mention issues like crop damage due to weather phenomenon and non universal access to formal credit.
rest of the answer is decent

Marks: 4.5

Mohsin Khursheed
1 year ago

Q2. MOJO9615J00A46183569

60B72351-B65D-4FA4-A371-4ED871515990.jpeg
04D7CFD8-EC6B-4A64-89C5-E32B3E94B954.jpeg
C8FF78AE-1F79-4ACB-AB47-82EA7AC872F3.jpeg
Mohsin Khursheed
1 year ago

NOT CHECKED

Parth Verma
Editor
1 year ago

Hi Mohsin
Dont change the font size in the mid of sentence. It looks like your scrambling for the space and gives a bad taste to your answer.
Rest of the answer is good.
Your second part of the answer is excellent.
You have covered all the angles and subheadings in perfect manner.
Work on your presentation.

Marks:5

Mohsin Khursheed
1 year ago

Q4. MOJO9615J00A46183569

C77A0412-E433-432B-9312-79C2329A9FB8.jpeg
1368153E-8408-4AB1-99DA-731D7A034C29.jpeg
A0C2BD06-BB99-4C61-B833-77AFD3FE11BD.jpeg
Mohsin Khursheed
1 year ago

NOT CHECKED

Parth Verma
Editor
1 year ago

In the c part, you have to provide the limitations of the approach as well.
Your overall discussion is good but you have to give arguments of other sides as well. Like what are the challenges that you will face in a and b. What are the limitations at your own end.
Rest of the discussion is good and detailed.
Last part is well written.

Marks: 5

avani k
1 year ago

Q1

New Doc 2019-07-19 01.40.54_1.jpg
New Doc 2019-07-19 01.40.54_2.jpg
New Doc 2019-07-19 01.40.54_3.jpg
Parth Verma
Editor
1 year ago
Reply to  avani k

Hi Avani
Good intro and first part.
Flow chart is ok but more content is needed there.
In the reasons, do mention issues like crop damage due to weather phenomenon and non universal access to formal credit.
You can skip the discussion on “impact”
You have already discussed the solutions in the 2nd part hence you dont need the sub heading of way forward. Way forward means what should be done in future.
Good discussion in 2nd part as well.
Marks: 5.5

avani k
1 year ago

Q2

New Doc 2019-07-19 01.40.54_4.jpg
New Doc 2019-07-19 01.40.54_5.jpg
New Doc 2019-07-19 01.40.54_6.jpg
Parth Verma
Editor
1 year ago
Reply to  avani k

Good intro.
Give better sub headings and try to write complete sentence. For example, rather than writing “Reasons” in the 1st sub heading, you can simply mention “Importance of public transport”
The content is ok but structure needs better flow.
Good way forwards.

Marks: 4

avani k
1 year ago

Q4

New Doc 2019-07-19 01.40.54_7.jpg
New Doc 2019-07-19 01.40.54_8.jpg
Parth Verma
Editor
1 year ago
Reply to  avani k

The arguments in all the parts are one sided. Though you mentioned some of the cons but their discussion needs more depth.
In the c part, you have to provide the limitations of the approach as well.
What are the challenges that you will face in a and b. What are the limitations at your own end?
Rest of the discussion is good and detailed.

Marks: 4

mud borne
1 year ago

Hi Team

Please review

mud borne
1 year ago
Reply to  mud borne

Please ignore. I have again posted answers to the questions separately

project _osiris
1 year ago

1

project _osiris
1 year ago

1.ans

15635113644898832990101102681659.jpg
15635113876454870058996952243065.jpg
Parth Verma
Editor
1 year ago

Hi Project Osiris
One page’s orientation is wrong and second pa not readable due to the shine of the flash of your device.
Good intro.
After intro, mention some of the stats from the NCRB report because its an important aspect of the question.
In the reasons, do mention issues like crop damage due to weather phenomenon and non universal access to formal credit.
Decent way forwards.
But answer ends abruptly.

Marks: 3

project _osiris
1 year ago

2.

sourav singh
1 year ago
Shivangi Uliana
1 year ago

Q3. MOJO9710800D30462641

1563650157207311737725604678371.jpg
15636501765872938237085568720428.jpg
Parth Verma
Editor
1 year ago

Hi Shivangi
The necessary balance in the discussion is missing.
You have to give arguments of both sides like what are the issues and challenges with the scheme.
rest of the answer is good.
Points in 1st and 2nd part are good and detailed.
Good conclusion.

Marks: 3.5

Shivangi Uliana
1 year ago

Q1. MOJO9710800D30462641

15636529967022143238304875589911.jpg
15636530164128163332520402079011.jpg
15636530453644703735457511000485.jpg
Parth Verma
Editor
1 year ago

Very large intro. Avoid it. Dont discuss the reasons in the intro itself.
1st part of the answer lacks necessary depth.
There are multiple reasons cited by the NCRB report. Use them.
Like banking sector exerting pressure for recovery of loans; problems in maintaining farm livestock; problem in getting credit at good terms and conditions; issue of crp damage due to bad weather; absence of mechanization, Insufficient transport facilities, Farm population per hectare increased whereas per-capita income has declined, Diversion of farm land into non-agricultural land, APMC and local traders exploiting farmers, High input cost and worsened quality of soil due to excessive use of fertilizers, Political incentives given to the farmers’ family after suicidal death by politicians further motivates other farmers to take the step at the cost of family welfare etc.
Decent way forward.

Marks: 4

Murari Jha
1 year ago

q1
MOJO9708E00A65259027

Parth Verma
Editor
1 year ago
Reply to  Murari Jha

Hi Murari
Quite a good discussion.
But avoid so much cutting in your answer.
Your coverage of the answer is good and detailed.
Keep it up.

Marks: 6

Murari Jha
1 year ago

q2
MOJO9708E00A65259027

Parth Verma
Editor
1 year ago
Reply to  Murari Jha

The issue of over cutting needs to be rectified.
Answer ends abruptly. Try to give conclusion.
Apart from that, the structuring and content of the answer are excellent.
All the major elements are covered.
Keep it up.

Marks: 5

Murari Jha
1 year ago

q3
MOJO9708E00A65259027

Parth Verma
Editor
1 year ago
Reply to  Murari Jha

Do not write solution at the start. Its intrinsic that this is the answer!
Apart from cutting, excellent answer.
Your structuring is really good.
Your way of dividing discussion into various small sub headings are on good line and an unique practice.
The points are on right track.
All in all very good attempt.

marks: 6.5

Kunal Aggarwal
1 year ago

Q1

IMG_2273.JPG
IMG_2272.JPG
IMG_2271.JPG
Parth Verma
Editor
1 year ago
Reply to  Kunal Aggarwal

Hi Kunal
Good intro.
After intro, briefly mention points and stats given by the NCRB report as in the trend of increasing suicides and geographical areas etc.
Your discussion in 1st oart is OK but you can add more points like Like banking sector exerting pressure for recovery of loans; problems in maintaining farm livestock; problem in getting credit at good terms and conditions; issue of crp damage due to bad weather; absence of mechanization, Insufficient transport facilities, Farm population per hectare increased whereas per-capita income has declined, Diversion of farm land into non-agricultural land, APMC and local traders exploiting farmers, High input cost and worsened quality of soil due to excessive use of fertilizers, Political incentives given to the farmers’ family after suicidal death by politicians further motivates other farmers to take the step at the cost of family welfare etc.
Decent way forward.
Language is good.

Marks: 4

Kunal Aggarwal
1 year ago

Q2

IMG_2276.JPG
IMG_2275.JPG
IMG_2274.JPG
Parth Verma
Editor
1 year ago
Reply to  Kunal Aggarwal

A bit lengthy intro.
In fact all the paragraphs are on the wrong side of the prescribed length!
Avoid habit.
Coming to your content, it is good and balanced.
But after intro, briefly mention what is wrong with our current public transport system. Only then your answer will have some background and platform to build upon.
Language is decent.

Marks: 5

Kunal Aggarwal
1 year ago

Q3

IMG_2279.JPG
IMG_2278.JPG
IMG_2277.JPG
Parth Verma
Editor
1 year ago
Reply to  Kunal Aggarwal

Good intro.
But the main body has discussed only the challenges or issues with the scheme.
What are the intended benefits or success of the scheme?
This will bring necessary balance to your answer.
Rest of the discussion is wonderful.
Good conclusion.

marks: 3.5

Kunal Aggarwal
1 year ago

Q4

IMG_2282.JPG
IMG_2281.JPG
IMG_2280.JPG
Parth Verma
Editor
1 year ago
Reply to  Kunal Aggarwal

In the c part, you have to provide the limitations of the approach as well.
Your overall discussion is good but you have to give arguments of other sides as well. Like what are the challenges that you will face in a and b. What are the limitations at your own end.
Rest of the discussion is good and detailed.
Explanation is crisp yet detailed.
Avoid writing in one flow. Give some break in your discussions.

Marks: 5.5

pranab prakash
1 year ago

Payment ID MOJO9611300N14575632
Q1

Parth Verma
Editor
1 year ago
Reply to  pranab prakash

Hi Pranab
Good intro.
After intro, briefly mention points and stats given by the NCRB report as in the trend of increasing suicides and geographical areas etc.
Read the model answer for more points in the 1st part. When discussing something’s reason from a report, then do mention the reasons cited in that report.
Very good 2nd part.
Language is good.

Marks: 4

pranab prakash
1 year ago

Payment ID MOJO9611300N14575632
Q2

Parth Verma
Editor
1 year ago
Reply to  pranab prakash

There are multiple scope of improvements in the answer.
After intro, mention the issues of the present public transport system.
You discussed the way forwards right in the beginning. But you were supposed to give points regarding public transport system and dual objective of lower carbon emission and healthy population.
Only then you should come to the way forward part.
Points in way forward are ok.
Avoid half baked answers.
Marks: 1.5

pranab prakash
1 year ago

Payment ID MOJO9611300N14575632
Q3

Parth Verma
Editor
1 year ago
Reply to  pranab prakash

Structure of the answer is good but content needs more discussion and depth.
Read the model answer in that regard.
Try to be more detailed in your approach Pranab.

Marks: 3.5

mud borne
1 year ago
Parth Verma
Editor
1 year ago
Reply to  mud borne

Hi Mud Borne
Good intro.
After intro, briefly mention points and stats given by the NCRB report as in the trend of increasing suicides and geographical areas etc.
Your discussion in 1st oart is OK but you can add more points like Like banking sector exerting pressure for recovery of loans; problems in maintaining farm livestock; problem in getting credit at good terms and conditions; issue of crp damage due to bad weather; absence of mechanization, Insufficient transport facilities, Farm population per hectare increased whereas per-capita income has declined, Diversion of farm land into non-agricultural land, APMC and local traders exploiting farmers, High input cost and worsened quality of soil due to excessive use of fertilizers, Political incentives given to the farmers’ family after suicidal death by politicians further motivates other farmers to take the step at the cost of family welfare etc.
Good way forward.
But answer ends abruptly. Give conclusion.

Marks: 4.5

mud borne
1 year ago

Please Review
Q2

Parth Verma
Editor
1 year ago
Reply to  mud borne

Answer starts and ends abruptly with least amount of discussion.
It is not clear whether it is 1st part or way forward.
After intro, mention the issues of the present public transport system.
Then you were supposed to give points regarding public transport system and dual objective of lower carbon emission and healthy population.
Only then you should come to the way forward part.
Avoid half baked answers.

Marks: 1

mud borne
1 year ago

Please Review
Q3

Parth Verma
Editor
1 year ago
Reply to  mud borne

What is the scheme about?
Your answer is again half baked and just finished under one page.
Read the model answer.
This kind of structuring and presentation is not good for actual exam.
You have to have proper structure and depth in your content.

Marks: 1

mud borne
1 year ago

Please Review
Q4

Parth Verma
Editor
1 year ago
Reply to  mud borne

Once again half baked answer.
There is no depth and width in the discussion.
In ethics answers, you have to look for arguments from both side and never present yourself as superior or rigid.
In the c part, you have to provide the limitations of the approach as well.
You have to give arguments of other sides as well. Like what are the challenges that you will face in a and b. What are the limitations at your own end.

Marks: 3

Parth Verma
Editor
1 year ago

Do not start the answer right away.
Give some intro.
Poor structure and flow.
Presentation needs lot of work.
Points are placed in haphazard manner.
What are the challenges in present day public transport system?
Read the model answer.

Marks: 2.5

Varsha Chauhan
1 year ago

MOJO9611C00A14581096

Parth Verma
Editor
1 year ago
Reply to  Varsha Chauhan

Hi Varsha
Your overall discussion is good but you have to give arguments of other sides as well. Like what are the challenges that you will face in a and b. What are the limitations at your own end.
Rest of the discussion is good and detailed.
Explanation is crisp yet detailed.

Marks: 5.5

Vishvjeet Holkar
1 year ago
Parth Verma
Editor
1 year ago

Hi Vishvjeet
Quite a good discussion.
But avoid so much cutting in your answer.
Your coverage of the answer is good and detailed.
Good flow chart

Marks: 6

Vishvjeet Holkar
1 year ago
Parth Verma
Editor
1 year ago

1st part is good.
Your discussion in that part is decent and has necessary depth.
But 2nd part needs more work.
Give proper way forward.
Try to explain a bit more.

Marks: 3.5

Vishvjeet Holkar
1 year ago
Parth Verma
Editor
1 year ago

Good balance and discussion in the answer.
Points are well placed.
Intro is decent
Conclusion can be made stringer.
Points in way forward are excellent.
But do explain bit more.

Marks: 5

vinay bhalekar
1 year ago

Q1 MOJO9620O00D18665402

image.jpg
image.jpg
image.jpg
Parth Verma
Editor
1 year ago
Reply to  vinay bhalekar

Hi Vinay
Near perfect answer.
Coupled with good handwriting, the presentation, structure and content are fine too.
Your points have necessary depth and width.
Discussion is all encompassing.
Very good attempt. Keep it up.

Marks: 7

vinay bhalekar
1 year ago

Q2 MOJO9620O00D18665402

image.jpg
image.jpg
image.jpg
Parth Verma
Editor
1 year ago
Reply to  vinay bhalekar

Excellent answer.
Your structuring is really good.
All the parts are dealt with nicely and perfectly.
The points are on right track.
All in all excellent attempt.

marks: 6.5