💥Join UPSC 2027,2028 Mentorship (July Batch) + XFactor Notes & Microthemes PDF
Talk to Mentor

Civilsdaily

Login

GS Paper: Agriculture and related issues

  • Understanding curbs on rice exports

    What’s the news?

    • The Indian Government Implements Rice Export Restrictions to Stabilize Domestic Prices

    Central Idea

    • In a bid to control domestic rice prices and safeguard the country’s food security, the Indian government has implemented a series of measures that impact rice exports and production. These steps include prohibiting the export of white rice, imposing a 20% export duty on par-boiled rice and allowing the export of Basmati rice only for contracts valued at $1,200 per tonne or higher.

    What is the rice production estimate?

    • Rabi season: According to the third Advanced Estimate of the Department of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare, during the Rabi season 2022-2023, rice production was 13.8% less, at 158.95 lakh tonnes tons, compared to 184.71 lakh tonnes during Rabi 2021-2022.
    • Kharif season: Kharif sowing data show that rice is sown on 384.05 lakh hectares this year as on August 25 compared with 367.83 lakh hectares during the same period last year.
    • Shortfall in the south-west monsoon: In states such as Tamil Nadu, where the Samba crop sowing usually starts in August in the Cauvery delta area, now it will be delayed due to a shortfall in the south-west monsoon.
    • El Niño effects: Trade and rice millers say that new-season crop arrivals will start after the first week of September, and that El Niño effects are likely to impact arrivals to some extent. According to M. Sivanandan, secretary of the Tamil Nadu Rice Millers Association, paddy prices that were ₹27 a kg last year this month is at ₹33 a kg now.

    Rice Exports Overview

    • India’s Global Leadership: India boasts the position of being the world’s largest rice exporter, holding a significant 45% share in the global rice market.
    • Export Growth in 2023: During the months of April and May in 2023, rice exports surged significantly by 21.1% compared to the same period in the preceding fiscal year.
    • Basmati Rice Export Surge: Notably, the month of May saw a remarkable growth of 10.86% in Basmati rice exports as opposed to May 2022.
    • Non-Basmati Exports Rise: Despite the introduction of a 20% export duty on white rice and the prohibition of broken rice exports in September, non-Basmati rice shipments saw a noteworthy increase of 7.5% in exports.

    Trends and Data

    • Steady Non-Basmati Exports: The trend of rising non-Basmati rice exports has remained consistent over the past three years.
    • Basmati Exports Performance: Data from the All-India Rice Exporters’ Association indicates that exports of Basmati rice for the 2022-2023 period surpassed the figures from the previous year.
    • August 17 Exports: Up until August 17, 2023, the total rice exports (excluding broken rice) reached 7.3 million tonnes, showcasing a substantial 15% increase in comparison to the 6.3 million tonnes recorded during the corresponding period in the preceding year.

    Global Challenges and Impact

    • Challenges in Other Nations: Beyond India, several countries are grappling with challenges in rice production and exports.
      • Thailand anticipates a nearly 25% decrease in production in the upcoming year.
      • Myanmar has halted raw rice exports.
      • Adverse crop conditions are reported in Iraq and Iran, affecting their rice crops.

    How Will These Measures Help India?

    • Food Security Assurance: Banning rice exports ensures a steady supply of rice within the country.
    • Price Stability: By restricting rice exports, the government can prevent abrupt spikes in domestic rice prices.
    • Supporting Vulnerable Populations: The ban on exports helps maintain affordable prices for rice.
    • Managing Supply Chain Resilience: Export bans mitigate disruptions in the rice supply chain. This ensures that even in the face of challenges such as adverse weather conditions or logistical issues, the availability of rice in the domestic market remains consistent.
    • Strengthening Local Procurement: By redirecting rice to local markets, the government can enhance its efforts to procure grains for public distribution programs.

    Concerns Raised

    • Export Revenue Impact: Exporters might experience reduced revenue due to limited access to international markets. This can affect their financial viability and potentially lead to job losses within the export sector.
    • Trade Relations: Imposing export bans could strain trade relationships with countries that rely on India as a rice supplier. Diplomatic efforts might be required to manage any potential tensions arising from these restrictions.
    • Long-Term Export Effects: Prolonged export restrictions could result in a loss of market share over time. Competing rice-exporting countries might seize the opportunity to strengthen their presence in international markets, impacting India’s export potential once the ban is lifted.
    • Global Food Price Influence: Reduced rice supply from a major exporter like India could contribute to global food price volatility, affecting the food security of other nations.
    • Efficiency Concerns: In some cases, export bans might lead to inefficiencies in resource allocation. If farmers have surplus produce that cannot be exported, it could result in wastage or inadequate storage facilities.

    What can Indian farmers expect?

    • Minimum Support Price (MSP) Increase: The government has raised the Minimum Support Price (MSP) for rice, indicating that farmers can anticipate better returns for their crops. This ensures that the paddy purchased by rice millers will be priced higher than the MSP, providing farmers with improved income.
    • Price Stability for Farmers: Rice prices are not expected to decline for farmers due to the increased MSP and other measures. This stability in prices can contribute to more consistent and predictable incomes for agricultural producers.
    • Controlled Rice Price Climbs: The restrictions on rice exports are designed to prevent steep price increases in the domestic market. Farmers can expect that the government’s efforts to stabilize rice prices will positively impact their ability to fetch reasonable rates for their produce.
    • Better Income Prospects: With a higher benchmark price established by the government, farmers are likely to benefit from improved earnings. This elevation in benchmark prices is expected to translate into better market rates for their rice.
    • Secured Long-Term Availability: While there may be a minor current increase in rice prices for domestic consumers, the long-term availability of rice is secured. Farmers can anticipate a steady demand for their produce without fear of drastic price fluctuations.

    Suggestions provided by exporters

    • Reclassification for Export Decisions: Exporters suggest that the government should classify rice as either common rice or specialty rice for export policy decisions, rather than solely categorizing it as Basmati and non-Basmati. This approach aims to tailor policies to different rice varieties.
    • Geographical Indication Recognition: Trade policy consultant S. Chandrasekaran proposes that rice varieties with Geographical Indication (GI) recognition should be shielded from general market interventions. This measure aims to preserve the unique qualities of these specific rice types.
    • Basmati Rice Export Policy: A Basmati rice exporter, Mohit Gupta, recommends that the government should have allowed Basmati rice exports to continue or set a minimum value for exports, such as $900 per tonne. Gupta argues that such restrictions could impact both exporters and farmers, as demand influences paddy purchases.

    Conclusion

    • The Indian government’s recent measures to control rice exports and stabilize the domestic market exhibit a multifaceted approach. As stakeholders await further developments and clarifications on government policies, the long-term impact on Indian agriculture and rice exports remains an evolving narrative.

  • Gene-edited mustard: Less pungent, more useful

    What’s the news?

    • Scientists have used gene editing to create mustard plants with lower glucosinolate levels in seeds, improving their suitability for cooking oil and animal feed, potentially reducing India’s reliance on imported vegetable oils.

    Central idea

    • India’s domestically grown oilseeds, like rapeseed and mustard, provide cooking oil and protein-rich livestock meals. However, the pungent flavor from high glucosinolate levels limits consumer appeal, and an unpalatable meal poses livestock challenges. A genetic breakthrough offers hope, potentially transforming mustard’s applications.

    Rapeseed-Mustard: A Key Crop

    • Rapeseed-mustard plays a vital role in India’s oilseed landscape, accounting for 42.6% of vegetable oil production and 30.3% of meal production, second only to soyabean.
    • Glucosinolates in mustard seeds contribute to the characteristic pungency of their oil and meal.

    What is glucosinolate?

    • Glucosinolates are a group of sulfur- and nitrogen-containing compounds found in plants, including rapeseed-mustard.
    • These compounds contribute to the distinctive pungent taste and aroma of mustard seeds and other cruciferous vegetables.
    • The glucosinolates in mustard seeds are responsible for their characteristic flavor but can also limit their acceptability for consumption and livestock feed due to their strong taste and potential negative effects on animals.

    The Distinction Between GE and GM Crops

    1. Genetically Modified (GM) Crops:
    • Contain foreign genes from other species, such as Bacillus thuringiensis bacteria in cotton or Bar-Barnase-Barstar in GM hybrid mustard.
    • Subject to stringent environmental release regulations in India, requiring clearance from the Genetic Engineering Appraisal Committee (GEAC) under the Ministry of Environment.
    • GEAC’s approval is not solely binding; final authorization comes from the Union Government.
    1. Genetically Edited (GE) Crops:
    • Are transgene-free or non-GM, containing no foreign genes.
    • The Cas9 enzyme, used for gene editing, is eliminated in subsequent generations, resulting in transgene-free lines.
    • Benefit from an exemption provided by the MoEFCC on the requirement for GEAC approval for open field trials of GE plants free of exogenous introduced DNA.
    • Approval is now necessary at the level of an Institutional Bio-Safety Committee (IBSC) comprising scientists engaged in GE crop development and the DBT.

    A Breakthrough in Gene Editing

    • Researchers, including those at Delhi University and the Indian Council of Agricultural Research, have employed CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing to address the glucosinolate issue.
    • They edited 10 out of 12 GTR genes in the Varuna mustard variety, significantly reducing glucosinolate content in seeds while maintaining higher levels in leaves and pod walls.
    • This editing also improved resistance to fungal pathogens and insect pests, enhancing the plant’s defense mechanisms.

    Significance of this development

    • Reducing Edible Oil Imports: India’s significant dependence on edible oil imports, valued at $20.84 billion (Rs 167,270 crore) for the FY ending March 2023, underscores the need to curb foreign exchange outflow and enhance domestic production.
    • Addressing Economic Strain: The extensive import value strains India’s trade balance and foreign exchange reserves, making it imperative to boost self-reliance in edible oil production.
    • Promoting Agricultural Self-Sufficiency: This development aligns with India’s goal of achieving greater agricultural self-sufficiency by reducing reliance on imports and enhancing domestic oilseed production.
    • Impact on Oilseed Crops: Mustard and soyabean, cultivated across 9 million and 12.5 million hectares, respectively, are key to India’s oilseed sector. Mustard’s higher oil-extractable content of 38% accentuates its significance.
    • Nutritional and Livestock Benefits: Mustard’s improved suitability for culinary and animal feed purposes positively impacts both human nutrition and the livestock sector.
    • Scientific Innovation: The creation of genetically edited (GE) low-seed, high-leaf glucosinolate mustard lines and GM hybrid mustard showcases India’s scientific capabilities and innovation in agriculture.
    • Enhanced Food Security: By augmenting domestic oilseed production and quality, this development contributes to India’s food security and reduces its vulnerability to global market fluctuations.

    Conclusion

    • The genetic breakthrough in editing mustard genes offers potential to revolutionize India’s oilseed sector. By lowering seed glucosinolate levels and maintaining higher leaf levels, it improves culinary and feed suitability. As the GE variety undergoes trials, it addresses oil seed production, import reliance, and self-sufficiency needs.

     

     

  • Urea Gold

    fertiliser

    What’s the news?

    • Late last month, Prime Minister Narendra Modi officially launched Urea Gold fertiliser.

    Central idea

    • In a significant development, Prime Minister Narendra Modi unveiled Urea Gold, a novel fertiliser product, created by Rashtriya Chemicals and Fertilizers Ltd (RCF), a state-owned entity. This pioneering formulation involves enhancing urea with sulphur to address crucial agricultural challenges.

    What is Urea Gold?

    • Traditional urea primarily consists of 46% nitrogen (N). Urea Gold represents a leap forward by combining 37% nitrogen and 17% sulphur.
    • This innovative composition serves two primary purposes: bolstering soil quality and boosting nitrogen utilization efficiency.

    Soil Deficiencies Nitrogen Utilization Efficiency (NUE)

    • Soil Deficiencies in India
    • Indian soils suffer from deficiencies, particularly in key nutrients like sulphur (S).
    • This deficiency is particularly crucial for certain crops such as oilseeds and pulses, which play a significant role in India’s agricultural output. These crops require adequate sulphur for healthy growth and optimal yield.
    • The deficiency in sulphur can hinder their productivity and affect the overall agricultural landscape.
    • Nitrogen Utilization Efficiency (NUE) Challenge
    • NUE refers to the proportion of applied nitrogen fertilisers that is effectively taken up by crops for growth and yield production.
    • Only about 35% of the nitrogen from urea, a commonly used fertiliser, is utilized by crops in India.
    • The rest, roughly 65%, is lost through various processes, including ammonia volatilisation into the atmosphere and leaching into the ground as nitrate.

    Challenges in Urea Consumption in India

    • Import Dependency: India heavily relies on imported urea due to insufficient domestic production. Around 7.6 million tonnes of urea were imported out of the total 35.7 million tonnes sold last fiscal year.
    • Feedstock Dependency: The feedstock for domestic urea production, natural gas, is predominantly imported. This adds to the overall import dependence for the fertiliser.
    • High Consumption: Urea is India’s most widely used fertiliser, with consumption rising from 26.7 million tonnes to 35.7 million tonnes between 2009-10 and 2022-23.
    • Environmental Impact: Excessive urea usage contributes to environmental problems such as air and water pollution. Ammonia emissions and nitrate leaching are associated with these environmental challenges.
    • Higher Input Costs: Inefficient fertiliser use due to low NUE leads to higher input costs for farmers. They need to apply more fertiliser to achieve desired yields.

    Significance of Urea Gold

    • Nutrient Enrichment: Urea Gold is a novel fertiliser fortified with sulphur (S). It contains 37% nitrogen (N) and 17% sulphur, addressing soil deficiencies that are critical for crops like oilseeds and pulses.
    • Targeted Improvement: The sulphur content in Urea Gold addresses the specific nutrient requirements of oilseeds and pulses, which are crucial components of Indian agriculture and are significantly import-dependent.
    • Packaging and Pricing Shift: Urea Gold’s introduction might entail packaging in 40-kg bags, adapting to the preferences of farmers.While exact pricing remains undisclosed, market trends suggest Urea Gold could be priced between Rs 400 to Rs 500 per 40-kg bag.
    • Enhanced NUE: The sulphur-coated urea granules in Urea Gold facilitate a controlled and gradual release of nitrogen. This extended nutrient availability improves NUE, leading to reduced fertiliser application frequency and better crop health.
    • Sustainable Agriculture: Urea Gold’s dual focus on addressing soil deficiencies and improving NUE contributes to more sustainable agricultural practices. It reduces excessive fertiliser use and associated environmental impact.
    • Economic Benefit: The improved NUE offered by Urea Gold has the potential to reduce input costs for farmers, as they can achieve similar or better yields with lower fertiliser quantities.
    • Potential Yield Boost: The sustained nitrogen release mechanism of Urea Gold can potentially lead to increased crop yields due to longer periods of vibrant foliage and enhanced nutrient availability.

    Potential Hurdles

    • Pricing Uncertainty: Lack of clear pricing details for Urea Gold could impact its adoption among farmers.
    • Subsidy Disparity: The current additional rates offered by the government may not sufficiently incentivize companies to promote fortified fertilisers like Urea Gold.
    • Limited Farmer Incentives: Farmers might perceive fortified fertilisers as more expensive compared to traditional options, leading to reluctance in adoption.
    • Distribution Challenges: Ensuring uniform distribution and application of fortified fertilisers presents logistical complexities.
    • Regulatory Influence: Regulatory aspects, such as pricing controls and subsidy structures, can affect the feasibility of fortified fertiliser products.
    • Awareness Gap: Limited farmer awareness regarding the benefits and correct usage of fortified fertilisers might hinder their willingness to switch.
    • Production Scalability: Scaling up fortified fertiliser production to meet demand and ensure availability poses a significant hurdle.

    Way Forward

    • Price Rationalization: The government could consider revisiting subsidy rates to make fortified fertilisers economically attractive for both companies and farmers. This would encourage the adoption of innovative products like Urea Gold.
    • Subsidy Structure: Tailoring subsidies to reflect the enhanced benefits of fortified fertilisers, such as improved NUE and reduced environmental impact, could encourage their adoption.
    • Education Campaigns: Launching awareness campaigns about the advantages of fortified fertilisers, like Urea Gold, can educate farmers and dispel misconceptions about their higher costs.
    • Field Demonstrations: Organizing on-field demonstrations of the benefits of fortified fertilisers could provide tangible evidence to farmers, boosting their confidence in making the switch.
    • Long-Term Perspective: Encouraging farmers to consider the long-term economic and environmental benefits of fortified fertilisers could shift their focus from initial cost concerns.
    • Market Diversification: Exploring partnerships with private sector players and agribusinesses to promote fortified fertilisers could enhance market penetration.
    • Gradual Transition: Gradually phasing in fortified fertilisers while continuing to offer traditional options at subsidized rates can ease farmers into adopting the new products.

    Conclusion

    • Urea Gold’s introduction marks a significant step towards addressing the complexities of modern agriculture. To fully harness the power of fortified fertilisers, a multi-faceted approach is needed – blending cutting-edge technology with conducive policies – to steer Indian agriculture towards sustainable growth and heightened productivity.

     

  • Urea Gold: Making Urea more efficient

    urea gold

    Central Idea

    • The recent launch of “Urea Gold,” a fortified fertiliser by Rashtriya Chemicals and Fertilizers Ltd (RCF), has sparked interest as it combines urea with sulphur to enhance nitrogen use efficiency (NUE).
    • It seeks to tackle challenges of escalating urea consumption and declining agricultural efficiency.

    What is Urea Gold?

    • Composition: “Urea Gold” blends urea with sulphur to create a fortified fertiliser aimed at improving NUE and crop performance.
    • NUE Enhancement: The fortified blend ensures gradual nitrogen release, sustaining plant health and potentially reducing fertiliser application frequency.

    Challenges of Urea Consumption and NUE Decline

    urea

    • Urea Consumption Surge: Urea consumption has risen from 26.7 million tonnes to 35.7 million tonnes between 2009-10 and 2022-23, making it India’s predominant fertiliser choice.
    • Import Dependency: Domestic urea production relies heavily on imported natural gas. India’s annual consumption trails only China’s, where coal-based production prevails.
    • Declining NUE: Only around 35% of nitrogen applied through urea benefits crops, raising concerns about resource wastage and increased fertiliser application.

    Fortified Fertiliser Solution

    • Coating Strategy: Fortified fertilisers entail coating primary nutrients (N, P, K) with secondary nutrients (S, calcium, magnesium) and micronutrients (zinc, boron, manganese, etc.).
    • Enhanced Benefits: Coated fertilisers act as “carrier products” for secondary and micronutrients, thereby increasing their N and P use efficiency and ensuring controlled nutrient release.
    • Innovation by Yara International: The “Procote” technology facilitates micronutrient coating, demonstrating improved fertiliser efficacy.
    • Efficacy Confirmation: The trials substantiated amplified paddy and wheat yields through micronutrient-coated fertilisers, potentially mitigating NUE concerns.

    Pricing and Distribution Challenges

    • Pricing Complexities: Existing subsidies for coated fertilisers like zincated urea and boronated DAP may not incentivise companies to promote fortified products.
    • Farmer Adoption Hurdles: Discrepancies in pricing between fortified and non-fortified fertilisers have deterred farmers from embracing coated options.
    • Optimal Implementation: Advocates suggest factory-level coating to ensure uniform nutrient distribution and user convenience. Freeing maximum retail prices (MRPs) for coated fertilisers could bolster adoption.
    • Striking Pricing Balance: Since traditional fertilisers receive substantial subsidies, fortified product premiums must remain reasonable to encourage affordability.

    Conclusion

    • Amidst the challenges of dwindling NUE and escalating urea consumption, the introduction of “Urea Gold” and fortified fertilisers holds promise for enhancing agricultural efficiency.
    • The journey to successful implementation necessitates addressing pricing discrepancies and distribution intricacies.

  • Issues related to Seeds in Indian Agriculture

    What’s the news?

    • Agriculture and allied sectors are central to the Indian economy. Keeping this and a sustainable future in mind, the Indian government, quite rightly, is promoting technology-enabled sustainable farming, including natural, regenerative, and organic systems, during its G20 presidency.

    Central idea

    • Despite achieving food security through the production of 330 MT of food grains, challenges persist in meeting the demand for coarse cereals, pulses, oil seeds, and vegetables. These shortcomings contribute to a large undernourished population, including a substantial child wasting rate of 19.3%.

    The Rise of the Indian Seed Industry

    • Strong Foundation (1960s): The National Seeds Corporation was established, setting the groundwork for the industry’s growth.
    • Policy Impetus (Late 1980s): Proactive policies and regulatory support boosted the industry’s development.
    • Legislative Landmark (2001): The Protection of Plant Varieties and Farmers Rights Act was enacted, bolstering intellectual property rights and innovation.
    • Technological Transition (2002): The introduction of BT cotton hybrids marked a shift toward technology-driven approaches for better productivity and sustainability.
    • Current Market Size: The Indian seed market is estimated at $4.0 to $6.0 billion, with untapped potential for global prominence.
    • Millet Leadership: India’s global leadership in millet production positions it to capture the international seed market.
    • Public-Private Collaboration: Collaboration between ICAR research institutions and private companies enhances the development of hybrid varieties.

    Major determinants of profitability in agriculture

    • Seed Quality and Varieties: High-quality seeds and improved crop varieties significantly impact profitability. Improved seeds can contribute to a yield advantage of up to 15-20% beyond the genetic potential under different cultivation conditions.
    • Input Costs: The costs of inputs like seeds, fertilizers, pesticides, and irrigation influence profitability. The cost of seed typically constitutes around 3 to 6% of the total cost of production, but it can provide up to a 15-20% yield advantage.
    • Land and Soil Management: Effective land preparation, soil health management, and crop rotation practices are critical for sustained profitability. Sustainable land practices help maintain productivity over the long term.
    • Water Management: Proper irrigation methods and access to reliable water sources impact profitability. Effective water management can reduce waste and increase yields.
    • Labor Efficiency: Efficient labor utilization, including timely planting, weeding, and harvesting, optimizes production processes and reduces labor costs.
    • Technology Adoption: Modern agricultural technologies like precision farming and mechanization enhance efficiency and reduce resource waste. Applied seed technologies can ensure good performance even under unfavorable conditions.
    • Market Access and Pricing: Access to markets and fair prices for agricultural products directly affect profitability. Public-private partnerships have improved Variety Replacement Rates (VRR) and Seed Replacement Rates (SRR) in field crops and vegetables.

    Challenges Ahead for the Indian Seed Industry

    • Climate Variability: Unpredictable weather patterns and shifting climate conditions challenge consistent seed production, impacting crop yields and resilience.
    • Resource Scarcity: Diminishing natural resources like water and arable land strain the industry’s capacity to meet the escalating demand for quality seeds.
    • Regulatory Framework: Navigating evolving and intricate regulations can hinder the timely release of new seed varieties, obstructing innovation.
    • Market Access: Equitable access to quality seeds, particularly in remote or economically disadvantaged regions, remains a significant challenge.
    • Global Competition: The fiercely competitive international seed market demands continuous improvement in quality and variety offerings.
    • Intellectual Property Protection: Safeguarding intellectual property rights while encouraging open innovation poses a delicate balancing act.
    • Consumer Preferences: Adapting seed varieties to evolving consumer preferences concerning nutrition, taste, and environmental impact is a dynamic challenge.

    Emerging Seed Technologies

    • Priming and Enhancement Protocols: These protocols prepare seeds to excel under various growing conditions. Particularly valuable in regions experiencing stressors, they boost seed performance independently or in conjunction with the seed’s genetic attributes.
    • Film Coating and Pelleting: Film coating involves a protective layer applied to seeds, aiding precise planting and acting as a vehicle for pesticides, nutrients, and growth promoters. Pelleting shares similar benefits, enhancing seed protection and handling.
    • Seed Treatments: Seed treatments encompass the application of biological or chemical pesticides to seeds, with contact or systemic action against pests and diseases during germination and early growth stages.
    • Bio-stimulants and Nutrients: Integration of bio-stimulants and nutrients into seeds fosters improved germination rates and rapid seedling establishment, contributing to overall plant vitality and productivity.
    • AI-Responsive Sensors/Substances: Seeds infused with AI-responsive sensors or substances can adjust plant responses to external stimuli, bolstering adaptability and performance across varying conditions.
    • Clean and Green Planting Materials: This technology revolves around generating environmentally friendly and high-performing planting materials for horticultural crops, aligning with sustainable cultivation practices.
    • Genetic Advancements in Variety Development: Genetic enhancements play a pivotal role in creating seed varieties with amplified traits such as disease resistance, augmented yield, and enhanced adaptability to shifting environments.
    • Metabolic Cues and Molecules: Seed enrichment with molecules or metabolites that act as cues in biological pathways can augment metabolic processes and overall plant well-being.

    Way Forward: Embracing Seed Technology for Sustainable Growth

    • Research and Innovation: Invest in innovative research for climate-resilient, high-yielding seed varieties.
    • Quality Assurance: Guarantee reliable access to quality-assured seeds to bolster the seed market’s stature.
    • Tech Transfer: Facilitate technology dissemination to fields via farmer training and extension services
    • Empower Smallholders: Ensure affordable, quality seeds and provide capacity-building programs

    Conclusion

    • As India forges ahead with sustainable agriculture, embracing seed technologies emerges as a linchpin for progress. With robust regulatory mechanisms, India’s journey towards a Clean Green Mission can set the stage for a greener, more resilient agricultural future.

  • Is India’s sugar surplus leading to a crisis?

    What’s the news?

    • India’s top sugarcane-growing states rely heavily on groundwater for irrigation, leading to concerns over groundwater depletion.

    Central idea

    • India’s remarkable achievement of becoming the world’s top sugar producer in 2021-2022, surpassing Brazil, brings with it a significant challenge. The overcultivation of sugarcane has resulted in a sugar surplus and high exports, negatively impacting groundwater levels. To safeguard the agricultural sector and protect vital natural resources, addressing groundwater overuse in the sugar industry is of utmost importance.

    Factors Behind the Excess Sugar Production

    • Government Policies and Subsidies: The Indian government’s policies and subsidies play a significant role in encouraging farmers to cultivate sugarcane. The fair and remunerative price (FRP) scheme ensures that sugar mills pay a minimum price to sugarcane farmers, guaranteeing them fair profits for their crop.
    • Domestic Demand: India’s position as the world’s largest consumer of sugar creates a substantial demand for sugar and its by-products. To meet this demand, farmers increase sugarcane cultivation, leading to excess sugar production.
    • Export Incentives: The surplus sugar production in India has led to higher exports, and the government offers export subsidies to boost overseas sales.

    Impact of Excessive Sugarcane Cultivation on Groundwater

    • Water Depletion in Groundwater Reservoirs:
    • Excessive sugarcane cultivation contributes to the depletion of groundwater reserves.
    • In regions with inadequate rainfall, farmers heavily rely on groundwater from confined aquifers to sustain sugarcane crops.
    • This over-extraction of groundwater leads to a reduction in groundwater levels, depleting the available water resources.
    • Groundwater Stress and Drought Concerns:
    • The extensive use of groundwater for sugarcane cultivation puts immense stress on groundwater reservoirs. In regions already experiencing groundwater stress, the additional demand for water exacerbates the problem.
    • Moreover, sugarcane cultivation often occurs in areas prone to drought, and excessive water usage further exacerbates the vulnerability of these regions to water scarcity.
    • Environmental Impacts:
    • Groundwater depletion due to excessive sugarcane cultivation can have severe environmental consequences.
    • As groundwater levels decline, it affects the health of ecosystems dependent on groundwater sources, such as wetlands, rivers, and lakes. Reduced flow in rivers and streams can harm aquatic life and disrupt local ecosystems.
    • Impact on Farmers and Livelihoods: Groundwater depletion directly affects farmers who rely on it for irrigation. As water levels drop, farmers may face difficulties in accessing sufficient water for their crops, leading to reduced yields and economic losses. In areas where sugarcane is the dominant crop, groundwater depletion can impact the livelihoods of farming communities.
    • Long-Term Sustainability Concerns:
    • The continued excessive use of groundwater for sugarcane cultivation is not sustainable in the long run.
    • Depleting groundwater reserves can lead to permanent damage to aquifers and reduce the overall capacity to support agricultural activities in the future.

    Solutions to address the problem of excessive sugar production

    • Crop Diversification: Encourage farmers to diversify their crops and reduce their heavy reliance on sugarcane cultivation. Introducing fair and comprehensive subsidy schemes for a variety of crops can help farmers diversify their cultivation, preventing monocultures and reducing the strain on groundwater resources.
    • Sustainable Sugarcane Cultivation Practices: Promote environmentally responsible sugarcane cultivation practices that prioritize groundwater conservation. Encouraging the use of drip irrigation, which reduces water consumption by up to 70% compared to flood irrigation, can be made mandatory in sugarcane-growing regions. The government can also offer subsidies to farmers for setting up drip irrigation systems.
    • Water-Saving and Management Systems: Invest in water-saving and management systems such as rainwater harvesting, wastewater treatment, and canal irrigation networks. These initiatives can minimize stress on groundwater reservoirs as alternative water sources become available for irrigation.
    • Groundwater Research and Mapping: Invest in groundwater research and mapping to better understand groundwater availability and distribution. This data can help in devising effective strategies to manage groundwater resources more sustainably.
    • Review of Export Incentives: Review export incentives and subsidies to ensure they are not leading to excessive sugar production and environmental degradation. Striking a balance between domestic demand and exports will help manage sugar production more efficiently.
    • Public Awareness and Education: Create public awareness campaigns to educate farmers about the importance of sustainable water management and the impact of excessive sugarcane cultivation on groundwater. Providing training and guidance on adopting water-saving practices can facilitate better resource management.
    • Government Regulations and Policies: Implement regulations and policies to control groundwater extraction and prevent overexploitation. By enforcing responsible water use, the government can protect groundwater resources and ensure their sustainability.

    Conclusion

    • Balancing sugar production with responsible water management practices is vital for the well-being of farmers, the preservation of natural resources, and the long-term stability of the agricultural sector. By implementing a multi-faceted approach that encourages crop diversification and sustainable cultivation practices, India can pave the way for a greener and more resilient future.

  • Monsoon and food inflation: a status check

    Monsoon

    What’s the news?

    • As of July 30, the current month has witnessed a significant 15.7% above-normal rainfall, transforming the cumulative deficit into an overall 6% surplus for the period from June 1 to July 30.

    Central idea

    • The southwest monsoon made a tardy start, arriving seven days late this year, resulting in 52.6% below-normal rainfall during the first two weeks. By the end of June, there was a cumulative deficiency of 10.1%. However, the scenario changed dramatically from the last week of June, as the monsoon recovered remarkably, covering the entire country by July 2—six days ahead of schedule.

    The monsoon’s erratic behavior and its impact on agriculture

    • Delayed Crop Planting: The late arrival of the southwest monsoon raised concerns among farmers about their ability to sow crops on time, potentially affecting overall agricultural productivity.
    • Uneven Rainfall Distribution:
    • During the first two weeks of the monsoon, the country experienced a substantial rainfall deficit, with the overall rainfall being 52.6% below the normal long-period average.
    • Eastern and southern India, except Tamil Nadu and Maharashtra, were among the regions that received insufficient rainfall, which can lead to water stress and impact crop growth and yields.
    • Cumulative Deficiency: By the end of June, the cumulative rainfall deficiency stood at 10.1%. This cumulative deficit further intensified worries about agricultural output and food security, as it could affect the availability of water for crops during crucial growth stages.
    • Crop Recovery: Despite the abysmal start, the monsoon showed signs of recovery. This turnaround led to increased kharif crop plantings, including rice, which had been lagging behind last year’s levels until mid-July.
    • Positive Impact on Sowing: The monsoon’s recovery improved sowing conditions for most major agricultural regions, except for certain areas in Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, Jharkhand, and West Bengal, where rainfall remained deficient.
    • Subsequent Impact on Yields: While the monsoon’s recovery positively impacted crop sowing, the ultimate impact on yields would largely depend on the rainfall during August and September.

    El Niño Concerns

    • The Oceanic Niño Index (ONI) in June exceeded the El Niño threshold of 0.5 degrees, reaching 0.8 degrees Celsius.
    • Many global weather agencies predicted that El Niño would persist and strengthen through the 2023-24 winter.
    • El Niño’s potential strengthening raised concerns about its impact on India’s monsoon in the coming months, particularly during August.
    • El Niño is known to suppress rainfall in India, which could lead to a weakening of the monsoon during this crucial period.
    • A weakened monsoon can adversely affect crop growth, yields, and overall agricultural productivity.
    • If rainfall activity becomes progressively weaker due to El Niño’s influence, the implications can extend beyond the kharif season and impact the rabi winter-spring crops as well.
    • Rabi crops, dependent on stored rainwater, might be more vulnerable to a weakened monsoon, leading to potential losses and food production challenges.

    Prospects of food security: Food inflation and stock situation

    • Rice and Wheat Stocks: As of July 1, rice and wheat stocks in government godowns were reported to be at 71.1 million tonnes (mt). This stock level is the lowest in five years for this date.
    • Impact of the Delayed Monsoon on Rice Planting:
    • Due to the delayed monsoon, rice acreage initially picked up only after mid-July. It is unclear how much of this acreage is under short-duration varieties (around 125 days from seed to grain maturity).
    • If the rice belt had received rain on time, farmers might have planted more long-duration varieties (around 150–155 days), which yield higher at about 1–2 tonnes per hectare.
    • Re-transplanting in Punjab and Haryana: There are reports of farmers in Punjab and Haryana having to undertake paddy re-transplanting in large areas along the Beas, Sutlej, Ghaggar, and Yamuna rivers. This re-transplanting is likely for shorter duration varieties that usually yield less.
    • Sugar Stocks and Exports: The estimated sugar stocks with mills at the end of September 2023 are projected to be 6.3 mt, a six-year low. The Indian government has already banned exports of sugar to manage domestic supply.
    • Pulses and Edible Oil:
    • Among pulses, arhar (pigeon-pea) and urad (black gram) have registered a dip in acreage due to rain deficiency in Maharashtra, Karnataka, and Telangana. However, Rajasthan is expected to deliver a bumper crop of moong (green gram).
    • Chana (chickpea) has ample stocks due to government procurement, and masoor (red lentil) is being imported at rates below the government’s minimum support price.
    • Edible Oil Inflation: Edible oil inflation is likely to remain low, supported by imports projected to exceed 15 mt, a new all-time high, by the end of the current oil year in October 2023.
    • Milk Production and Prices: The supply of milk is expected to ease with buffalo calvings beginning from August. This will reflect in increased milk production, peaking during the winter and remaining high until next March-April.
    • Vegetables: Vegetable inflation has been on the rise, contributing to an unacceptably high consumer price index inflation number for July. However, with faster supply responses, vegetable inflation is expected to fall as easily as it rose.

    Way forward

    • Monitor Monsoon Developments: Continuously monitor the progress of the monsoon and its distribution across regions. Timely and accurate weather forecasting can help farmers make informed decisions about crop planting and irrigation.
    • Crop Diversification: Encourage farmers to diversify their crop choices to reduce dependence on water-intensive crops. Promote the cultivation of climate-resilient crops that require less water and are suitable for specific agro-climatic zones.
    • Strategic Buffer Stock: Maintain a strategic buffer stock of essential food commodities like rice and wheat to address any temporary supply shortages and stabilize food prices during periods of volatility.
    • Supply Chain Management: Improve supply chain logistics to ensure smooth transportation and distribution of agricultural produce. This will help prevent post-harvest losses and ensure the timely availability of food in the market.
    • Price Stabilization Measures: Implement effective price stabilization measures to control food inflation and prevent price volatility. These measures may include regulating exports, imports, and MSP (Minimum Support Price) mechanisms.
    • Encourage Pulses and Oil seed Production: Provide incentives and support to farmers for increasing pulses and oilseed production. This can reduce the country’s dependence on imports and stabilize prices.
    • Support the Dairy Sector: Extend support to the dairy sector to enhance milk production and improve the availability of dairy products. This can help stabilize milk prices and ensure food security.

    Conclusion

    • The monsoon’s erratic behavior has impacted crop sowing and food inflation in India. While the recovery has been promising, concerns over El Niño persist, making it vital for the government to monitor the agricultural sector closely and implement appropriate measures to ensure food security.

  • NITI Aayog suggests changes to APMC System

    apmc

    Central Idea

    • Experts from NITI Aayog have put forth recommendations to revamp the existing Agriculture Produce Marketing Committee (APMC) system in India’s agriculture sector.

    NITI Aayog

    • NITI Aayog stands for the National Institution for Transforming India. It is a policy think tank and a government institution in India.
    • It was established on January 1, 2015, to replace the Planning Commission, which was the central agency responsible for formulating India’s Five-Year Plans.
    • PM serves as the ex-officio Chairman of NITI Aayog.
    • It has a full-time Vice-Chairperson, who is usually a renowned economist or policy expert, and also includes several full-time members and special invitees.
    • Its primary objective is to provide strategic and policy inputs to the central and state governments in India with a focus on sustainable and inclusive development.

    What is APMC?

    • APMCs are created by state governments, reflecting agriculture’s status as a State List subject under the Indian Constitution.
    • APMC’s existence aims to safeguard farmers from exploitation by large retailers and maintain reasonable retail price spreads.
    • All food produce must first be brought to market yards and then sold through auction as per the Agricultural Produce Marketing Regulation (APMR) Act.

    Establishments of APMCs

    • British Raj Influence: The regulation of raw cotton under the Hyderabad Residency Order in 1886 marked the beginning of agriculture produce market regulation in India.
    • Royal Commission’s Recommendation: The 1928 Royal Commission on Agriculture recommended the regulation of marketing practices and the establishment of regulated markets.
    • Model Bill and Independence: The Government of India prepared a Model Bill in 1938, but significant progress was made only after India gained independence.
    • Enactment of APMR Acts: During the 1960s and 1970s, most states enacted and enforced Agricultural Produce Markets Regulation (APMR) Acts, bringing primary wholesale assembling markets under their ambit.

    Working of APMCs

    • APMCs operate on two principles:
    1. Ensure that farmers are not exploited by intermediaries (or money lenders) who compel farmers to sell their produce at the farm gate for an extremely low price.
    2. All food produce should first be brought to a market yard and then sold through auction.
    • Each state that operates APMC markets (mandis) establish their markets in different places within their borders, geographically dividing the state.
    • Farmers are required to sell their produce via auction at the mandi in their region.
    • Traders require a license to operate within a mandi.

    Key Reforms Suggested by NITI Aayog

    (1) Alternative Marketing Options

    • App-Based Sales and E-commerce: The experts suggest leveraging technology for app-based sales of farm produce by individual farmers or farmer groups. Additionally, they emphasize the potential of e-commerce and digital commerce as alternative marketing avenues.
    • Subsidy Reforms: To address the over-exploitation of groundwater due to free or highly subsidized power, they recommend direct payment of subsidy amounts to farmers and shifting to the metered power supply.

    (2) Modernizing Agriculture

    • Corporate Investments: The paper highlights that about 80% of investments in agriculture come from private sources, mainly farmers. However, the corporate sector’s involvement remains low, and they believe there is significant potential for corporate expansion in agribusiness.
    • Market Integration and Competition: Encouraging corporate investment in areas like warehousing, logistics, cold chain, food processing, and value chain development would improve market integration and competition over time and space.

    (3) Enhancing Farmer Income

    • High-Value Crops and Livestock Activities: To boost the income of farmers with small land holdings, the experts suggest enabling them to focus on high-value crops and livestock activities while supplementing their agricultural income with non-agricultural sources.
    • MSP Reforms: The Minimum Support Price (MSP) system should be designed to avoid market distortions. The paper proposes using a combination of procurement and price deficiency payment to pay MSP to farmers, linked to public distribution system needs, price stability, and strategic stocks.

    Earlier reforms: Three Farm Laws

    Reforms were passed in the form of three acts in 2020 (later repealed) which led to massive protests.

    1. Farmers’ Produce Trade and Commerce Act: This act aimed to promote and facilitate trade and commerce of farmers’ produce outside the physical boundaries of APMCs, allowing farmers to sell their produce in other markets and directly to buyers.
    2. Farmers Agreement on Price Assurance and Farm Services Act: This act empowered farmers to enter into agreements with buyers, ensuring a guaranteed price for their produce and access to various farm services.
    3. Essential Commodities Amendment Act: This amendment sought to remove restrictions on the movement and storage of essential commodities, promoting a more open market.

    Conclusion

    • Balancing Farmer Interests and Market Efficiency: While the reforms aim to create a more competitive and liberalized market, it is crucial to address farmers’ concerns and protect their interests.
    • Dialogue and Collaboration: To find common ground, constructive dialogue and collaboration between the government and farmers are essential in shaping the future of agricultural reforms.

  • PM-PRANAM Scheme gets cabinet nod

    pranam

    Central Idea

    • The union cabinet has given its approval to PM-PRANAM scheme, which aims to promote the usage of alternative fertilizers and balanced utilization of chemical fertilizers.
    • This scheme, announced in the budget for 2023-24, reflects the government’s commitment to sustainable agricultural practices and the conservation of natural resources.

    What is PM-PRANAM Scheme?

    • PM-PRANAM stands for Prime Minister Promotion of Alternate Nutrients for Agriculture Management Yojana.
    • The scheme was proposed during the National Conference on Agriculture for Rabi Campaign in September 2022.
    • Its objective is to reduce the subsidy burden on chemical fertilizers by promoting the use of alternative fertilizers.

    Notable features of the scheme

    • Incentivizing States and UTs: The scheme incentivizes states and Union Territories to promote the usage of alternative fertilizers and achieve a balanced use of chemical fertilizers. States that demonstrate significant savings in funds due to reduced chemical fertilizer usage receive grants as incentives.
    • Subsidy Savings Allocation: Around 50% of the subsidy savings resulting from reduced chemical fertilizer consumption will be allocated as a grant to the state that exhibits the highest savings. This encourages states to actively participate in the adoption of alternative fertilizers.
    • Creation of Assets: A significant portion (70%) of the granted funds will be utilized for creating assets associated with the technological integration of alternate fertilizers. This includes establishing production units at the village, block, and district levels, facilitating local production and availability of alternative fertilizers.
    • Recognition and Incentives for Farmers: The remaining 30% of the granted funds will be utilized to incentivize and recognize farmers and other village entities for their contributions to reducing fertilizer usage. This recognizes their efforts in adopting sustainable agricultural practices.
    • Environmentally Friendly Farming Practices: The scheme aims to promote environmentally friendly farming practices by encouraging the adoption of alternative fertilizers. This reduces the dependency on chemical fertilizers, which in turn contributes to environmental conservation and sustainability.
    • Long-term Soil Health and Agricultural Ecosystems: By promoting a balanced use of fertilizers, the scheme ensures the long-term health and fertility of agricultural ecosystems. It emphasizes sustainable agricultural practices that preserve soil health and protect natural resources.
    • Technological Integration: The scheme supports the integration of technology into agriculture for the production and utilization of alternative fertilizers. This includes the establishment of production units at the grassroots level, encouraging local production and accessibility of alternative fertilizers.

  • Direct Seeding of Rice (DSR): A Water-Saving Alternative for Paddy Cultivation

    rice paddy direct

    Central Idea

    • The ongoing southwest monsoon season in India has registered a deficiency of 37.2% in rainfall.
    • Weak monsoon affects paddy cultivation, a water-intensive crop.
    • This article explores the Direct Seeding of Rice (DSR) as a water-saving alternative to traditional transplanting methods in the context of deficient rainfall.

    Understanding Direct Seeding of Rice (DSR)

    • DSR is the method of directly sowing paddy in the field without nursery preparation, puddling, or flooding.
    • Traditional transplanting methods use flooded fields to suppress weed growth and provide oxygen to the roots.
    • DSR replaces water with chemical herbicides for weed control.
    • DSR offers potential water savings and reduces irrigation dependency during early crop stages.

    DSR Technique and Water Savings

    • Field Preparation: Ploughing, laser levelling, and soil compaction to retain moisture.
    • Sowing: Using DSR machines for direct sowing in the field.
    • Weed Control: Application of pre-emergent herbicides to suppress weed germination.
    • Reduced Irrigation: First irrigation required 18-20 days after sowing, reducing water usage.

    Benefits and Cost Savings

    • Water Savings: DSR reduces the total number of irrigations compared to traditional methods.
    • Labor Savings: DSR machines cover larger areas in less time, reducing labor requirements and costs.
    • Herbicide Costs: Additional expenses for herbicides are offset by savings in labor costs.

    Challenges and Adoption of DSR

    • Subsidized Electricity: Availability of subsidized or free electricity for irrigation reduces incentives for DSR adoption.
    • Machine Design: Limited access to well-designed and efficient DSR machines hampers widespread adoption.
    • Proper Plant Spacing: Achieving optimal plant-to-plant distance is crucial for successful DSR.
    • Policy Incentives: State governments offering financial incentives for DSR adoption, such as in Haryana and Punjab.

    Environmental and Sustainability Benefits

    • Conservation of Water Resources: DSR reduces water consumption and contributes to water conservation efforts.
    • Reduced Carbon Footprint: DSR eliminates the need for flooding fields, reducing methane emissions.
    • Soil Health and Erosion Prevention: DSR promotes soil health by minimizing soil disturbance and erosion risks.

    Future Outlook

    • Government Initiatives: Promoting DSR through subsidies, awareness campaigns, and support for efficient machine development.
    • Research and Development: Continuous research to improve DSR techniques, herbicide efficiency, and machine design.
    • Farmer Education and Training: Enhancing knowledge and capacity-building programs to encourage wider DSR adoption.
    • Future Prospects: Increasing DSR adoption can contribute to sustainable agriculture and resilience against water scarcity.

    Conclusion

    • Direct Seeding of Rice (DSR) offers a viable water-saving alternative to traditional transplanting methods.
    • Adoption of DSR can mitigate the impact of deficient rainfall and water scarcity.
    • Development of efficient DSR machines, supportive policies, and continuous research are crucial for widespread adoption of this sustainable farming technique.