💥Mains Ready By December. Smash Mains & Smash PYQ Admissions Open
Talk to Mentor

Civilsdaily

Login

GS Paper: GS2

  • The issue with criminalizing all adolescent relationships

    Why in the News?

    The Supreme Court of India’s May 2025 judgment in Re: Right to Privacy of Adolescents has come into the spotlight due to its landmark stance on adolescent sexuality, criminal justice, and the limitations of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act in dealing with consensual relationships involving minors.

    What about the POCSO Act?

    The Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act, 2012 is a comprehensive law enacted by the Government of India to protect children (below 18 years) from sexual abuse, sexual harassment, and pornography. It ensures a child-friendly legal process and provides for special courts to conduct speedy trials.

    Why is reforming the age of consent under POCSO being debated?

    • Criminalisation of Consensual Adolescent Relationships: The current age of consent (18 years) under the POCSO Act criminalises all sexual activity involving minors, even when it is consensual and non-exploitative. Eg: In the 2025 Supreme Court case from West Bengal, a 14-year-old girl in a consensual relationship faced legal action, despite her opposition to the punishment of her partner.
    • Disconnect Between Law and Ground Realities: There is a gap between the legal framework and social realities, as many POCSO cases involve romantic relationships rather than abuse. Eg: An Enfold study (2016–2020) found that 24.3% of POCSO cases in Assam, Maharashtra, and West Bengal involved consensual romantic relationships, with 82% of victims refusing to testify against the accused.
    • Need to Recognise Adolescent Agency with Safeguards: Critics argue that adolescents aged 16–18 are capable of giving informed consent under certain conditions, and blanket criminalisation undermines their agency. Eg: The UNCRC’s General Comment No. 20 recommends non-criminalisation of consensual acts between adolescents of similar age and calls for laws that address coercion, not curtail autonomy.

    How does the 2025 Supreme Court judgment reflect a rights-based approach?

    • Upholding the Right to Dignity and Autonomy (Article 21): The Court acknowledged the woman’s emotional and financial struggles, choosing not to impose a sentence on the accused to protect her well-being and dignity. This affirms the constitutional right to life with dignity and shifts focus from punitive justice to restorative justice.
    • Prioritising the Voice of the Affected Individual: By forming an expert committee to assess the now-adult woman’s preferences before sentencing, the Court ensured her voice and agency were central to the legal outcome, a key tenet of rights-based jurisprudence.
    • Recognising Systemic Failures and Suggesting Reforms: The Court acknowledged the collective failure of social and legal systems and directed the central government to consider reforms such as comprehensive sexuality education, life-skills training, and rehabilitation support — addressing structural rights violations beyond the courtroom.

    Case study: 

    • Canada – Close-in-Age Exemption: Canada sets the age of consent at 16, but allows consensual sexual activity between adolescents through close-in-age exemptions (e.g., a 14-year-old can engage in consensual activity with someone less than 5 years older).
    • South Africa – Teddy Bear Clinic Case (2013): The Constitutional Court ruled that criminalising consensual sex between adolescents aged 12–15 violates their rights to dignity and privacy.

    How can the law better balance adolescent protection with agency? (Way forward) 

    • Introduce a Close-in-Age Exemption: Laws can decriminalise consensual relationships between adolescents close in age (e.g., 16–18), while still penalising exploitation or coercion. Eg: Several countries (like Canada) apply a “close-in-age” defence to avoid criminalising consensual teenage relationships.
    • Differentiate Between Exploitative and Non-Exploitative Acts: Legal provisions should recognise that not all sexual activity involving adolescents is exploitative. The law must distinguish abuse of power from mutual adolescent relationships. Eg: General Comment No. 20 under UNCRC urges states not to criminalise non-exploitative, consensual adolescent activity.
    • Incorporate Adolescent Perspectives in Legal Processes
      Courts should ensure that adolescents’ voices and choices are considered, especially in determining intent, coercion, and consent. Legal procedures should be sensitive to their evolving capacities. Eg: In Re: Right to Privacy of Adolescents (2025), the Supreme Court consulted the adolescent before deciding sentencing.

    Mains PYQ:

    [UPSC 2024] Right to privacy is intrinsic to life and personal liberty and is inherently protected under Article 21 of the Constitution. Explain. In this reference discuss the law relating to D.N.A. testing of a child in the womb to establish its paternity.

    Linkage: The article talks about the  right to privacy of young individuals, particularly in the context of their relationships and the subsequent legal interventions that deeply impact their lives. The Supreme Court’s revisiting of its stance and prioritizing the voice of the young person under Article 142 demonstrates the judiciary’s role in interpreting fundamental rights like privacy in complex social scenarios involving adolescents.

  • The U.S. established and extinguished multilateralism 

    Why in the News?

    The 2025 BRICS Summit highlighted a significant shift in the global order, with the United States under Donald Trump bypassing multilateral institutions like the UN, promoting bilateralism, and weakening the Global South’s collective voice.

    What does the decline of multilateralism mean for India?

    • Reduced Collective Bargaining Power: With institutions like the United Nations (UN) being marginalised, India can no longer rely on multilateral forums to advocate for Global South interests. Eg: The BRICS 2025 Declaration failed to address the erosion of multilateralism or emphasize South-South cooperation.
    • Shift Towards Bilateralism and Strategic Autonomy: India must engage through commerce-driven bilateral deals and assert strategic autonomy between global powers. Eg: India’s loss in the UNESCO Vice-Chair election to Pakistan underlines the need for stronger bilateral influence and independent foreign policy.
    • Focus on Self-Reliance and Regional Partnerships: India should now concentrate on its own economic growth and build strong ties with nearby countries to reduce dependence on global powers. Eg: India linking trade deals with the U.S. to agreements with ASEAN nations shows a shift toward regional cooperation.

    Why is South-South cooperation crucial for India now?

    • Enhances Development Partnerships: South-South cooperation allows India to share low-cost technologies, development models, and capacity-building expertise with other developing countries. Eg: Through the Indian Technical and Economic Cooperation (ITEC) programme, India trains professionals from over 160 countries in fields like IT, agriculture, and governance.
    • Secures Access to Critical Resources: Collaboration with Global South nations helps India access vital natural resources and raw materials essential for its manufacturing and energy needs. Eg: India’s investment in lithium and cobalt mines in Africa supports its EV and battery manufacturing push under the Make in India initiative.
    • Builds Resilience Against Western Dependency: Strengthening ties within the Global South reduces overreliance on Western economies and institutions, especially in times of geopolitical uncertainty or trade sanctions. Eg: The India-Brazil-South Africa (IBSA) Fund supports poverty alleviation and post-conflict reconstruction, demonstrating a collective southern-led approach.

    How can India use its tech and industrial strengths globally?

    • Exporting Digital Public Infrastructure (DPI): India can leverage its success in building scalable digital platforms to assist developing countries in digital governance and financial inclusion. Eg: India’s Modular Open-Source Identity Platform (MOSIP), modeled on Aadhaar, has been adopted by Philippines, Morocco, and Sri Lanka to develop their own digital ID systems.
    • Promoting Green Industrial Innovation: India’s industrial base is increasingly oriented towards clean energy and sustainable manufacturing, which can be exported as part of global decarbonisation efforts. Eg: Indian companies like ReNew Power and Tata Power Solar are investing in solar and wind energy projects in Africa and Southeast Asia.
    • Becoming a Global Hub for Frugal Innovation: India’s expertise in low-cost, high-impact technology (also known as frugal innovation) can benefit developing nations with limited resources. Eg: The Jaipur Foot, a low-cost prosthetic limb developed in India, is being distributed in countries like Rwanda and Honduras through international collaborations.

    How can the 2026 BRICS Summit boost India’s leadership?

    • Revitalising Global South Unity: India can use the Summit to reposition BRICS as a platform for South-South cooperation, shifting focus from collective bargaining in forums like G-77 to mutual prosperity and strategic autonomy among emerging economies.
    • Showcasing Economic and Technological Strength: By highlighting its achievements in infrastructure, green energy, digital economy, and innovation (e.g. GenAI patents), India can project itself as a model for inclusive and sustainable growth, inspiring other developing nations.
    • Shaping a Post-Multilateral Global Order: With declining trust in traditional multilateral institutions, India can steer BRICS toward new frameworks of trade, finance, and diplomacy, boosting its global influence and cementing leadership in a multipolar world.

    What strategic shifts should guide India’s foreign policy? (Way forward)

    • Reinforcing Strategic Autonomy: India must maintain a neutral stance amidst intensifying U.S.-China rivalry by prioritising core national interests over bloc politics. This includes independent voting in global forums and diversifying strategic partnerships beyond traditional allies.
    • Pivot to the Global South: India should lead a rejuvenated South-South cooperation framework by promoting trade, technology, and development cooperation with developing countries, positioning itself as a voice and leader of emerging economies.
    • Geo-Economic Realignment: Foreign policy should focus on economic diplomacy securing supply chains, signing bilateral trade pacts, and enhancing infrastructure and digital connectivity with the Indo-Pacific and ASEAN to counterbalance Western economic dependence.

    Mains PYQ:

    [UPSC 2024] The West is fostering India as an alternative to reduce dependence on China’s supply chain and as a strategic ally to counter China’s political and economic dominance.’ Explain this statement with examples.

    Linkage: The article talks about the U.S. is “engaging countries with strategic commerce-related bilateral deals that fragment the global order” and that its national interest now includes “containment of China’s influence”. This question directly reflects the shift in U.S. (part of “The West”) foreign policy as described in the article.

  • [pib] 10 Years of Skill India Mission

    Why in the News?

    The Ministry of Skill Development and Entrepreneurship launched a week-long celebration to commemorate 10 years of the Skill India Mission.

    About Skill India Mission:

    • Launch: It was launched in 2015 by the Ministry of Skill Development and Entrepreneurship (MSDE) to empower India’s youth with employable skills.
    • Training Target: The mission aims to train 40 crore individuals by 2022 across various economic sectors and make them job-ready.
    • Progress Achieved: Over 2.27 crore people have been trained under the programme, including rural youth, women, and marginalized communities.
    • Standardization and Quality Assurance: All training and certifications are aligned with the National Skills Qualification Framework (NSQF), ensuring uniform standards and industry relevance.
    • Digital Integration: The courses are digitally integrated with DigiLocker and the National Credit Framework (NCrF) for secure storage and seamless academic and career progression.
    • Employment and Education Linkages: It promotes formal recognition of skills, enhances industry alignment, and ensures better linkages with employment and higher education.

    Components of Skill India Mission:

    [A] Pradhan Mantri Kaushal Vikas Yojana 4.0 (PMKVY 4.0)

    • Focus: It provides short-term training, reskilling, and upskilling opportunities for the youth.
    • Target Age Group: The scheme targets individuals aged 15 to 59 years.
    • Courses Offered: More than 400 new courses have been introduced in emerging technologies such as artificial intelligence (AI), 5G, cybersecurity, green hydrogen, and drones.
    • Recognition and Mobility: It emphasizes international mobility and recognition of prior learning (RPL) to certify existing skills.
    • Alignment with Flagship Missions: It is aligned with flagship government missions like PM Vishwakarma, Surya Ghar Muft Bijli Yojana, and the National Green Hydrogen Mission.

    [B] Pradhan Mantri National Apprenticeship Promotion Scheme (PM-NAPS)

    • Objective: PM-NAPS aims to promote apprenticeship training across industries by providing financial support.
    • Incentive Structure: It offers 25% of the stipend (up to ₹1,500 per month) through Direct Benefit Transfer (DBT) to apprentices.
    • Sectoral Expansion: The scheme has expanded apprenticeship opportunities in sectors like AI, robotics, blockchain, green energy, and Industry 4.0.
    • Special Focus Areas: It gives special attention to small establishments, MSMEs, Aspirational Districts, and the North-East region.
    • Target Age Group: The scheme targets individuals in the age group of 14 to 35 years.

    [C] Jan Shikshan Sansthan (JSS) Scheme

    • About: It is a community-based vocational training initiative.
    • Target Beneficiaries: It focuses on empowering women, rural youth, and economically weaker sections through low-cost, flexible skilling programmes.
    • Target Age Group: The scheme is designed for individuals aged 15 to 45 years.
    • Integration with National Initiatives: The scheme is integrated with inclusive national initiatives like PM JANMAN and ULLAS (Understanding of Lifelong Learning for All in Society).
    [UPSC 2018] With reference to Pradhan Mantri Kaushal Vikas Yojana, consider the following statements:

    1. It is the flagship scheme of the Ministry of Labour and Employment.

    2. It, among other things, will also impart training in soft skills, entrepreneurship, financial and digital literacy.

    3. It aims to align the competencies of the unregulated workforce of the country to the National Skill Qualification Framework.

    Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

    Options: (a) 1 and 3 only (b) 2 only (c) 2 and 3 only* (d) 1, 2 and 3

     

  • Untouchability Cases Drop, Pendency Rises

    Why in the News?

    The 2022 Annual Report on the Protection of Civil Rights (PCR) Act, 1955, sheds light on the declining registration of untouchability-related offences and systemic inefficiencies in enforcing the law.

    Key Highlights of the 2022 Annual Report:

    • The report was released by Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment.
    • Only 13 cases were registered under the PCR Act in 2022, showing a decline from previous years.
    • No state or UT declared any area as “untouchability-prone.”
    • Courts had 1,242 cases pending; out of 31 disposed, ONLY 1 led to conviction.
    • In contrast, 62,501 cases were filed under the SC/ST Act, highlighting its growing use.
    • 18,936 inter-caste marriage couples received financial incentives, but data from several major states was missing.

    About Protection of Civil Rights (PCR) Act, 1955 and Its Provisions:

    • Enacted under Article 35 to implement Article 17 and criminalize untouchability.
    • Originally titled the Untouchability Offences Act, 1955, renamed and strengthened in 1976.
    • Key Provisions:
      • No provision for pardon; any conviction leads to disqualification from elections.
      • Penalties: Up to 2 years imprisonment, ₹2000 fine, or both.
      • Any right denied due to untouchability is considered a civil right under the Act.
    • Preventive Measures under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989:
      • Aimed at curbing atrocities and providing victim protection and rehabilitation.
      • Establishes special courts and police cells.
      • In some cases, allows firearms for self-defense by vulnerable SC/ST individuals.

    Understanding ‘Untouchability’ and Its Abolition:

    • What is it: Untouchability refers to social discrimination based on caste, historically excluding certain communities from public, religious, and social spaces.
    • Constitutional Safeguard: Article 17 of the Constitution of India abolishes untouchability and prohibits its practice in any form.
    • Legal Status: Any disability arising from untouchability is declared a punishable offence under Article 17.
    • Nature of the Right under Article 17: Article 17 is an absolute fundamental right with no exceptions, applicable to both state and private actors.
    • Lack of Definition: The term “untouchability” is not explicitly defined in the Constitution or in related legislation but is understood as referring to caste-based social discrimination.
    • Scope of Discrimination: Untouchability includes denial of access to public utilities, places of worship, public services, education, and market services.

    Various Judgments Related to Untouchability:

    • Devarajiah v. Padmanna (1961): This case reaffirmed that Article 17 is intended to eliminate inhuman treatment based on caste distinctions.
    • State of Karnataka v. Appa Balu Ingale (1993): The judgment likened untouchability to slavery and held that the caste system must be eradicated for democracy and the rule of law to survive.
    • Union of India v. People’s Union for Democratic Rights (1982): The Court ruled that violations of Article 17 by private individuals also warrant state intervention.
    • Union of India v. Safai Karamchari Andolan (2014): The Court directed the implementation of the Manual Scavengers and Dry Latrines (Prohibition) Act, 1993, and mandated rehabilitation, skill training, and compensation for families of victims of sewer deaths.

     

    [UPSC 2020] Which one of the following categories of ‘Fundamental Rights incorporates against untouchability as a form of discrimination?

    Options: (a) Right against Exploitation (b) Right to Freedom (c) Right to Constitutional Remedies (d) Right to Equality*

     

  • India’s strategic focus on West Africa

    Why in the News?

    Despite China’s increasing involvement in financing and infrastructure development, India continues to hold a significant position as one of Nigeria’s key partners in West Africa.

    What are the strategic objectives of India in West Africa?

    • Strengthening Bilateral Relations: India aims to enhance its strategic partnership with Nigeria, which is pivotal as Nigeria is both the largest economy and democracy in Africa. This partnership is expected to extend beyond Nigeria, influencing broader regional dynamics in West Africa.
    • Focus on Security Cooperation: Given the challenges of terrorism, piracy, and drug trafficking in Nigeria, India seeks to bolster security cooperation. This includes defence collaboration and joint efforts in counterterrorism operations against groups like Boko Haram.
    • Development Partnerships: India positions itself as a development partner by providing concessional loans and capacity-building programs, demonstrating a commitment to supporting Nigeria’s socio-economic growth.
    • Promotion of Global South Aspirations: Both India and Nigeria share common goals as leaders of the Global South, aiming to amplify their voices in international forums like the UN Security Council.

    How does India plan to enhance its economic ties with West African countries?

    • Diversifying Trade Relations: India plans to revitalize trade with Nigeria, which has seen a decline recently. Efforts include negotiating trade agreements such as the Economic Cooperation Agreement (ECA) and the Bilateral Investment Treaty (BIT) to facilitate investment and trade.
    • Sectoral Collaboration: The focus areas for economic collaboration include defense, energy, technology, health, and education. India’s PM discussions with the President of Nigeria emphasized leveraging India’s expertise in these sectors to foster mutual growth.
    • Infrastructure Development: India aims to support infrastructure development through concessional loans and technical assistance, building on existing projects that have benefited from Indian investment.
    • Cultural and People-to-People Exchanges: Enhancing cultural ties and promoting exchanges between citizens are also part of India’s strategy to strengthen bilateral relations, fostering goodwill and mutual understanding.

    What challenges does India face in its engagement with West Africa?

    • Geopolitical Competition: India’s engagement is challenged by China’s significant presence in Nigeria, where Chinese companies dominate various sectors including infrastructure and telecommunications. This competition complicates India’s efforts to establish itself as a key partner.
    • Economic Fluctuations: The decline in trade between India and Nigeria from $14.95 billion in 2021-22 to $7.89 billion in 2023-24 highlights vulnerabilities due to shifting global oil markets and increasing imports from other countries like Russia.
    • Political Instability: The political landscape in Nigeria can be unpredictable, posing risks for long-term investments and cooperation initiatives that require stability for successful implementation.
    • Capacity Constraints: While India offers developmental assistance, the effectiveness of these initiatives can be hindered by local capacity constraints in Nigeria, necessitating a tailored approach that considers local needs and capabilities.

    Way forward: 

    • Deepen Strategic Collaboration: Strengthen defence and security partnerships, diversify trade, and enhance collaboration in sectors like energy, technology, and health to counter China’s growing influence and foster mutual growth.
    • Focus on Regional Capacity Building: Expand developmental assistance with tailored initiatives addressing local needs, while supporting Nigeria’s stability through diplomatic engagement and joint Global South aspirations in international forums.

    Mains question for practice:

    Q Discuss the strategic objectives of India in West Africa, with a particular focus on its engagement with Nigeria. Highlight the challenges India faces in strengthening its ties in the region and suggest measures to address these challenges. (250 words) 15M

    Mains PYQ:

    Q Increasing interest of India in Africa has its pros and cons. Critically Examine. (UPSC IAS/2015)

  • [14th July 2025] The Hindu Op-ed: Secularism — implicit from day one, explicit in 1976

    PYQ Relevance:

    [UPSC 2024] Discuss India as a secular state and compare with the secular principles of the US Constitution.

    Linkage: The article talks about the concept of secularism was deeply embedded in India’s foundational principles long before the word was explicitly added to the Constitution. The question directly asks for a discussion of India as a secular state and a comparison with the secular principles of the US Constitution. This necessitates an understanding of the fundamental nature and historical evolution of Indian secularism, which aligns perfectly with the theme of “implicit from day one, explicit in 1976.”

     

    Mentor’s Comment:  Indian secularism is a core constitutional and civilizational value, not a foreign imposition. Secularism was always embedded in India’s political philosophy—rooted in Ashoka’s Dhamma, the freedom struggle, and Nehruvian ideals—long before the term was explicitly added to the Preamble in 1976.

    Today’s editorial analyses the ongoing national debate on secularism in India. This topic is important for  GS Paper II (Indian Polity) in the UPSC mains exam.

    _

    Let’s learn!

    Why in the News?

    Recently, the ongoing national debate on secularism in India, especially in light of rising Hindutva narratives, political calls to re-examine or delete the word “secular” from the Constitution, and broader questions about the role of religion in Indian politics and governance.

    What is the Indian model of secularism?

    • Equal respect for all religions: Unlike strict separation models (like in France), Indian secularism does not oppose religion but ensures that the state maintains a principled distance and treats all religions equally.
    • Religious autonomy with state neutrality: It protects religious communities from state interference, while also allowing the state to intervene in religious practices that violate fundamental rights (e.g., banning untouchability, regulating temple entry).
    • Rooted in pluralism and history: It draws from India’s civilizational ethos, including Ashoka’s Dhamma, and the ideals of the freedom struggle, ensuring a harmonious coexistence of diverse faiths within a democratic framework.

    Why did the Constitution’s framers reject a state religion for India?

    • Commitment to Equality and Non-Discrimination: The framers believed the state must treat all religions equally to ensure religious freedom and equal citizenship, irrespective of faith. Eg: The 1928 Motilal Nehru Report and 1931 Karachi Resolution explicitly advocated for state neutrality in religious matters.
    • Historical Legacy of Tolerance: India’s long tradition of religious pluralism, influenced by Ashokan edicts, emphasised coexistence and respect for all faiths, not state endorsement of one. Eg: Ashoka’s Rock Edict 7 promoted the idea that all religions should coexist peacefully.
    • Avoidance of Theocracy and Communal Division: After witnessing Partition and its communal violence, the framers feared that endorsing a state religion would deepen sectarian divides and weaken national unity. Eg: Even Syama Prasad Mookerjee and the Hindu Mahasabha’s 1944 draft constitution did not support declaring Hinduism as the state religion.

    What are the risks of redefining secularism in India’s current context?

    • Erosion of Religious Neutrality of the State: Redefining secularism could weaken the state’s impartial stance in religious matters, leading to preferential treatment for the majority religion and marginalisation of minorities. Eg: The growing demand to formally declare India a Hindu Rashtra could alienate religious minorities and threaten inclusive governance.
    • Undermining Constitutional Morality and Democratic Ideals: Secularism is part of the basic structure doctrine upheld by the Supreme Court. Altering it could compromise constitutional values like liberty, equality, and fraternity. Eg: The Kesavananda Bharati case (1973) affirmed secularism as an inviolable part of the Constitution.
    • Increase in Communal Polarisation and Social Instability: Shifting away from secularism may embolden majoritarian narratives, intensify hate speech, and provoke inter-religious conflicts, disrupting national unity. Eg: The Ram Temple consecration in 2024, influenced more by political decisions than theological consensus, reflects state intrusion into religious space.

    What can India learn from global models of religion–state relations?

    • Balance between Symbolism and Equality: Countries like England and Greece recognize a dominant religion symbolically (e.g., Anglican Church or Greek Orthodox Church), yet uphold equal rights and religious freedom for all citizens through constitutional guarantees. India can maintain its spiritual heritage while ensuring non-discrimination and equality in law.
    • Institutional Autonomy with Legal Safeguards: Ireland and Sri Lanka offer models where religion is acknowledged culturally, but the state cannot endow or control religious institutions, preserving religious autonomy and legal protection for minority practices. India can reinforce legal safeguards for all religions while maintaining a non-theocratic state.
    • Flexible Jurisdictional Models: In Western Thrace (Greece) and Sri Lanka, minority religious communities have the option to resolve disputes through personal or religious laws, within constitutional limits. India can explore plural legal frameworks that respect cultural autonomy without compromising constitutional supremacy.

    What are the steps taken by the Indian Government? 

    • Equal Treatment of All Religions: The state maintains neutrality in religious affairs — it does not promote or adopt any state religion, ensuring equal respect for all communities (e.g., no public funding for religious instruction in state-funded educational institutions).
    • Minority Rights Protection: Through Articles 29 and 30, the government protects cultural and educational rights of religious and linguistic minorities, allowing them to establish and manage educational institutions of their choice.
    • Personal Law Autonomy: The state allows different religious communities to follow their own personal laws in matters like marriage, divorce, and inheritance, reinforcing religious autonomy while also subjecting them to judicial review.
    • Legal Actions Against Communalism: The government has enacted laws like the Religious Institutions (Prevention of Misuse) Act, Places of Worship Act, 1991, and anti-hate speech provisions to prevent communal violence, hate speech, and religious polarization.
    • Representation and Inclusion: Reservation in educational institutions and government jobs for socially and educationally backward classes, including religious minorities, promotes inclusive development.

    Way forward: 

    • Strengthen Constitutional Literacy: Promote public awareness about secular values enshrined in the Constitution through education and civic outreach to counter misinformation and foster interfaith harmony.
    • Ensure Political Neutrality in Religious Matters: Enforce strict separation between religion and politics, preventing the misuse of religion for electoral gains and ensuring the State remains neutral in matters of faith.

  • Nominated Members to the Rajya Sabha

    Why in the News?

    The President of India has nominated Harsh Vardhan Shringla, Ujjwal Nikam, C. Sadanandan Master, and Meenakshi Jain to the Rajya Sabha.

    Nominated Members to the Rajya Sabha

    About Nominated Members to the Rajya Sabha:

    • Number and Tenure: The President of India nominates 12 members to the Rajya Sabha for a six-year term.
    • Purpose of Nomination: This provision is meant to honor individuals with exceptional contributions in the fields of arts, literature, science, and social service.
    • Constitutional Basis: This right is granted to the President under the Fourth Schedule, in accordance with Articles 4(1) and 80(2) of the Constitution of India.
    • Constitutional Provisions for Nominated Members:
      • Article 80(1)(a): Provides for nomination of 12 members to the Rajya Sabha by the President.
      • Article 80(3): Specifies that the nominees must have special knowledge or practical experience in one or more of the following fields: Literature; Science; Art; Social service.

    Composition of the Rajya Sabha:

    • Total Strength: The current strength of the Rajya Sabha is 245 members, comprising:
      • 233 elected members representing States and Union Territories
      • 12 nominated members by the President
    • Permanent Nature: The Rajya Sabha is a permanent body and is not subject to dissolution.
    • Biennial Retirement: One-third members retire every two years, and elections are held to fill the vacant seats.

    Powers and Privileges of Nominated Members:

    • Equal Rights in House Proceedings: Nominated members enjoy all powers, privileges, and immunities of an elected Member of Parliament.
    • Participation in Proceedings: They can take part in all debates, discussions, and committees in the House.
    • Voting Rights Exceptions:
      • They cannot vote in the election of the President of India.
      • They can vote in the election of the Vice President.
    • Political Affiliation Provision: According to Article 99, a nominated member is given six months to join a political party after being nominated.
    [UPSC 2014] Consider the following statements:

    1. The Chairman and the Deputy Chairman of the Rajya Sabha are not the members of that House. 2. While the nominated members of the two Houses of the Parliament have no voting right in the presidential election, they have the right to vote in the election of the Vice President.

    Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

    Options: (a) 1 only (b) 2 only* (c) Both 1 and 2 (d) Neither 1 nor 2

     

  • What are Autonomous District Councils (ADC)?

    Why in the News?

    Mizoram Governor has imposed Governor’s Rule in the Chakma Autonomous District Council (CADC) due to prolonged political instability and repeated leadership changes.

    About Autonomous District Councils (ADCs):

    • Basis: They are local self-governing institutions established under the Sixth Schedule of the Indian Constitution.
    • Coverage: ADCs are constituted in tribal areas of the northeastern states—Assam, Meghalaya, Tripura, and Mizoram (ATM2) [Sixth Schedule] 
    • Purpose: These councils aim to provide autonomy to tribal communities to preserve their culture, customs, and govern their local affairs.
    • Notification: Each tribal area notified under the Sixth Schedule is declared an autonomous district, governed by its respective ADC.
    • Objective: The primary objectives of ADCs are to promote tribal self-governance, ensure local development, and protect tribal identity and rights.

    Note: The Constitution provides for the reservation of seats in Panchayats for STs.

    Key Features of ADCs

    • Legal Status: ADCs are formed through constitutional provisions under the Sixth Schedule and are not governed by state laws.
    • Council Composition: Each ADC comprises up to 30 members, of which 26 are elected by adult suffrage and 4 are nominated by the Governor.
    • Tenure: The tenure of an ADC is 5 years from the date of its constitution.
    • Scope of Authority: ADCs have legislative, executive, and limited judicial powers specific to the needs of tribal communities.
    • Applicability of Laws: State and Central laws do not automatically apply in ADC areas unless explicitly extended by the Governor.

    Powers and Functions of ADCs:

    • Law-Making Powers: ADCs can enact laws on land management, agriculture, and forest use (excluding reserved forests).
    • Customary Regulations: They can regulate inheritance, marriage, divorce, and social customs, and appoint traditional chiefs and headmen.
    • Local Administration: It oversee services such as primary education, dispensaries, roads, markets, and fisheries.
    • Judicial Functions: Councils can establish village courts to try civil and criminal cases involving tribal members, with sentencing powers up to five years.
    • Regulation of Trade: They may regulate money lending and trade by non-tribals, subject to Governor’s approval.
    • Revenue Sources: It can levy taxes on professions, trades, animals, vehicles, markets, ferries, and public infrastructure like roads and schools.

    Autonomy and Limitations:

    • Degree of Autonomy: ADCs enjoy substantial legislative and administrative autonomy within their territorial jurisdiction.
    • Non-Applicability of General Laws: Parliamentary and State laws apply only when directed by the Governor, ensuring self-rule.
    • Governor’s Oversight: Despite autonomy, the Governor retains discretionary powers and can approve, modify, or annul council decisions.
    • Financial Constraints: ADCs often face limited revenue generation, which restricts their developmental effectiveness.
    • Administrative Challenges: Operational issues include leadership instability, shortage of trained personnel, and state-level interference in council functions.
    [UPSC 2015] The provisions in Fifth Schedule and Sixth Schedule in the Constitution of India are made in order to:Options: (a) protect the interests of Scheduled Tribes * (b) determine the boundaries between States (c) determine the powers, authority and responsibilities of Panchayats (d) protect the interests of all border States

  • In news: International Criminal Court (ICC)

    Why in the News?

    The International Criminal Court (ICC) has issued arrest warrants for senior Taliban leaders in Afghanistan over the persecution of women, a crime against humanity.

    About the International Criminal Court (ICC):

    • Established: 2002 under the Rome Statute (1998); headquartered at The Hague, Netherlands.
    • Nature: First permanent international court to try individuals for grave crimes.
    • Jurisdiction over 4 core crimes:
    1. Genocide
    2. Crimes against humanity
    3. War crimes
    4. Crime of aggression
    • Members: 124 States Parties
      • NON-members: India, China, USA, Russia, Israel, Ukraine
    • Structure:
      • Office of the Prosecutor – investigates and prosecutes cases.
      • 18 Judges – elected for 9 years.
      • Assembly of States Parties – governs ICC administration.
      • Trust Fund for Victims, Detention Centre
    • Languages: English, French, Arabic, Chinese, Russian, Spanish
    • Funding: Annual budget (2025) ~ €195 million (mostly from member states)

    Reach of an ICC Warrant:

    • Applicability:
      • Crimes by nationals of member states
      • Crimes committed on member state territory
      • UNSC referrals can extend jurisdiction to non-member states (e.g., Libya, Darfur)
    • Obligations on States:
      • Member states must execute arrest warrants and cooperate fully.
      • Non-compliance can be reported to Assembly of States Parties or UN Security Council (for UNSC referrals)
    • Challenges:
      • ICC lacks an independent enforcement mechanism
      • Non-members (e.g., US, Russia) are not bound to cooperate
      • Political and diplomatic constraints hinder the execution of warrants
    • Special Mechanisms: ICC established an Arrest Working Group (2016) to enhance warrant enforcement through better intelligence-sharing.
    [UPSC 2019] Consider the following statements:

    1.The International Criminal Court (ICC) has jurisdiction to prosecute nationals of even those States that have not ratified the Rome Statute.

    2. The International Criminal Court is a ‘court of last resort’ intended to complement national judicial systems.

    3. The United Nations Security Council can refer a situation to the Prosecutor of the ICC even if the State concerned is not a party to the Statute.

    Which of the statements given above are correct?

    Options:  (a) 1 and 3 only (b) 2, 3 and 4 only (c) 2 and 4 only (d) 1, 2, 3 and 4*

     

  • America is going back on all the things that made it great. India’s must seize the opportunity

    Why in the News?

    Recent U.S. domestic policies on universities, companies, and immigration are causing short-term economic pain for India. However, they also offer long-term strategic opportunities. These changes may indicate the end of Pax Americana.

    Why do U.S. policy shifts offer both risks and opportunities for India? 

    Opportunities for India: 

    • Manufacturing Opportunity: As U.S.–China tensions disrupt global supply chains, India can attract companies looking to diversify production. Eg: Apple shifting iPhone assembly to India reflects the country’s growing role as a China+1 manufacturing hub.
    • Chance to Implement Bold Domestic Reforms: With reduced global dependence, India can focus on strengthening its internal systems through deregulation, decentralisation, and investment in human capital. Eg: A proposed 180-day plan calls for cutting compliance burdens, empowering state governments, and granting autonomy to top institutions like IITs and IIMs.
    • Higher Education and Innovation Ecosystem: As American universities face political and financial pressure, India can position its institutions as global research and innovation leaders. Eg: Granting “poorna swaraj” (full autonomy) to institutions like IISc, Ashoka, and IITs can help them climb global university rankings and drive home-grown R&D.

    Risks for India: 

    • Decline in Remittances and Student Enrolment: Stricter U.S. immigration and visa policies can reduce the flow of Indian students and workers, affecting remittances and global exposure. Eg: H-1B visa tightening under Trump led to fewer Indian tech workers entering the U.S., impacting remittancesand brain circulation.
    • Disruption to Exports and Supply Chains: Protectionist trade measures and tariffs can disrupt India’s export-dependent sectors like software, pharmaceuticals, and electronics. 

    What impact has U.S. research and immigration had on India’s growth?

    • Skilled Immigration: Indian immigrants in the U.S. contribute significantly to tech and scientific advancement, creating reverse knowledge flow to India. Over 70% of H-1B visas (2022) were granted to Indians, many of whom later founded companies or returned with expertise. Eg: Infosys, Wipro, and TCS have benefited from U.S.-trained professionals in leadership and innovation roles.
    • High Remittances Fueling Economic Stability: Indian diaspora in the U.S. contributes a major share of remittance inflows, supporting India’s foreign exchange reservesand rural economy. According to the World Bank (2023), the U.S. contributed over $23 billion in remittances to India, nearly 25% of India’s total remittance receipts.
    • Advancing Indian R&D and Education: U.S. federal funding has indirectly boosted India’s scientific growth through collaborations and return migration. The National Institutes of Health (NIH) funded research contributed to 99% of new drugs approved between 2010–2019. Eg: Indian researchers trained in U.S. labs or funded via U.S.-India Science and Technology Forum (USISTEF)have driven innovation in biotech, vaccines, and AI in India.

    What does a weakening Pax Americana mean for India’s strategy?

    Pax Americana refers to the period of relative global peace and stability under the dominance of the United States, particularly after World War II.

    • Push for Strategic Autonomy and Multipolar Engagement: As U.S. dominance declines, India must strengthen ties with multiple global powers while maintaining independence in foreign policy. India’s active role in BRICS, QUAD, and IMEC reflects efforts to diversify strategic partnerships and avoid overdependence on any one nation.
    •  Accelerated Domestic Reforms for Economic Resilience: With global uncertainty, India needs internal strength through deregulation, decentralisation, and investment in infrastructure and skills. PLI schemes, Digital Public Infrastructure, Make in India, and self-reliance efforts show a move toward economic resilience.
    • Enhanced Role in Global Governance and Norm Setting: A weakening U.S. opens space for India to shape the global agenda in climate change, digital governance, and international trade. India’s G20 presidency and promotion of Digital Public Infrastructure as a global good underline its leadership in global norm-setting.

    What are the key reforms that can boost India’s global economic standing? (Way forward)

    • Simplification: Simplifying regulations for employers by reducing compliance burdens, redundant filings, and removing criminal penalties in business laws can foster a more business-friendly environment. A focused 180-day plan to cut red tape would significantly improve ease of doing business and attract global investors.
    • Decentralisation: Decentralising power to States and cities by transferring funds, functions, and personnel empowers local governments to drive regional economic development. This enhances capacity for targeted innovation and creates globally competitive manufacturing ecosystems.
    • Autonomy: Empowering higher education and research institutions like IITs, IISc, and IIMs through full autonomy allows them to innovate, form global collaborations, and improve their position in international rankings.

    Mains PYQ:

    [UPSC 2018] How would the recent phenomena of protectionism and currency manipulations in world trade affect the macroeconomic stability of India?

    Linkage: The rise of protectionism, which can be associated with policies like “Make America Great Again” mentioned in the article, signifies a shift in global trade dynamics. This question asks about the impact of such phenomena on India’s macroeconomic stability, underscoring the need for India to adapt and strengthen its economy in response to these global changes.