💥Join UPSC 2027,2028 Mentorship (August Batch) + XFactor Notes & Microthemes PDF
Talk to Mentor

Civilsdaily

Login

GS Paper: GS2

  • Discuss the role of the Vice-President of India as the Chairman of the Rajya Sabha.

    The Vice-President of India, under Article 64 of the Constitution, is the ex-officio Chairman of the Rajya Sabha (Council of States).

    Role of the Vice-President

    Presiding Authority – The Vice-President, as ex-officio Chairman, conducts proceedings, maintains order and decorum, and ensures smooth legislative functioning.

    Regulator of Debates – Allocates time, permits discussions, and ensures equal opportunity to both treasury and opposition benches.

    Interpreter of Rules – Decides points of order and interprets parliamentary rules to maintain procedural consistency.

    Casting Vote – Does not ordinarily vote but exercises a casting vote in case of a tie, ensuring impartial decision-making.

    Promotes Deliberation – Facilitates meaningful debates and consensus-building, enabling Rajya Sabha to act as a House of Review.

    Upholds Federal Balance – Protects state interests and ensures fair representation of diverse regional perspectives.

    Encourages Transparency – Ensures proceedings are open and accessible (e.g., live telecast of sessions) to enhance accountability.

    Maintains Impartiality – Expected to act above party lines, setting high ethical standards in conduct.

    Limitations of the Vice-President Compared to the Speaker of Lok Sabha

    Does not preside over joint sittings of Parliament (Article 118).

    The Vice-President cannot suspend or expel MPs for disorderly conduct, unlike the Speaker who can act under Rules 373 and 374A.

    No Role in Money Bills under Article 110.

    No Power Over Confidence Motions

    The Vice-President as Chairman ensures that the Rajya Sabha functions as the House of sober second thought, balancing federal interests and national priorities.

  • Discuss the role of the National Commission for Backward Classes in the wake of its transformation from a statutory body to a constitutional body.

    The 102nd Constitution Amendment Act, 2018 inserted Article 338B, elevating the commission to par with the NCSC and NCST.

    Role of the National Commission for Backward Classes

    Investigating Constitutional Safeguards provided to backward classes under the Constitution.

    Exercising Civil Court Powers to summon officials, demand public records, and examine witnesses during active inquiries.

    Inquiry into Rights Violations: investigates specific citizen grievances regarding the outright denial or subversion of rights belonging to SEBCs.

    Advising on Socio-Economic Development: Formulates policy guidelines and advises both Union and State governments on targeted welfare planning for backward communities.

    Evaluating Departmental Progress: Reviews and audits the grassroots performance and execution speed of central and state-level affirmative action schemes.

    Presents comprehensive structural review reports to the President of India regarding the operational health of welfare frameworks.

    The Union and State governments consult the NCBC on all major policy matters affecting SEBCs.

    Enforcing Reservation Compliance: Monitors and checks public sector recruitment pipelines to guarantee strict adherence to the mandated 27% OBC quotas.

    Aids the institutional procedure of identifying and reviewing communities for the Central OBC list under Article 342A.

    Case Studies

    Enforcing Creamy Layer Compliance in Public Sector Undertakings (PSUs)

    The commission played a central key role in implementation of the 27% OBC reservation within the All India Quota for undergraduate and postgraduate medical and dental courses (NEET).

    Major issues

    Recommendations are not binding on executive

    Overlapping jurisdiction with other bodies like NHRX, NCW etc

    Lack of administrative and financial autonomy

    Strengthening the NCBC is essential to achieve constitutional objective of Social Justice

  • The Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 remains only a legal document without intense sensitisation of government functionaries and citizens regarding disability. Comment.

    The RPwD Act, 2016 was enacted to align India’s legal framework with the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (UNCRPD) to promote equality, ensure dignity, and protect rights of PwDs.

    Key Features of the RPwD Act, 2016

    Expanded definition: Disability categories increased from 7 to 21, including autism, thalassemia, acid attack survivors, etc.

    Reservation: 4% in government jobs and 5% in higher education for PwDs.

    Accessibility: Mandates barrier-free public infrastructure, ICT accessibility, and universal design.

    Institutional Framework: Establishment of Central and State Advisory Boards, Chief Commissioner and State Commissioners for PwDs.

    Legal Protection: Punishment for discrimination, and provision of special courts to handle disability-related matters.

    Major Issues Hindering Effective Implementation

    Bureaucratic Issues

    Poor Institutional Implementation- As per Department of Empowerment of PwDs, only 23 of 35 States/UTs had constituted State Advisory Boards.

    Inaccessible Infrastructure- Under Accessible India Campaign (Sugamya Bharat), only 3% of government buildings were made fully accessible by 2024.

    Tokenistic Compliance- Disability cells in ministries lack funds and trained staff.

    Delay in appointing state commissioners and lack of special courts restrict legal recourse for PwDs.

    Fragmented Coordination- Overlap between ministries (Social Justice, Urban Affairs, HRD) causes slow execution of inclusive programs.

    Citizen Awareness and Social Sensitisation Issues

    Social Stigma and Prejudice- PwDs continue to face exclusion, pity narratives, and stereotypes in media and public life.

    Lack of Awareness Among Citizens and Local Institutions- Rural households and PRIs remain unaware of provisions such as disability certificates or reservation rights.

    Educational Exclusion- Despite RTE inclusion, schools lack special educators and assistive devices; enrolment gaps persist.

    Digital Divide and Communication Barriers- Most government websites and platforms fail web accessibility compliance standards (WCAG).

    Media Misrepresentation- Stereotyping of PwDs continues despite Supreme Court directives (2024) against derogatory portrayals in films and media.

    Way Forward

    Sensitisation – Conduct mandatory disability awareness training for civil servants, teachers, and health workers.

    Grassroots Awareness Campaigns: Use community radio, local NGOs, and ASHA/Aanganwadi networks.

    Institutional Strengthening: Fully operationalize State Advisory Boards, ensure adequate funding and monitoring.

    Accessibility Revolution: Enforce Sugamya Bharat milestones with real-time audits.

    True inclusion demands a “whole-of-society” approach-one that blends policy, participation, and perception change to realise the vision of “Sabka Saath, Sabka Vikas, Sabka Vishwas.”

  • Reforming the government delivery system through the Direct Benefit Transfer Scheme is a progressive step, but it has its limitations too. Comment.

    As per World Bank (2023), India’s DBT architecture is the largest social protection systems globally, covering over 900 million people.

    Progressive Aspects of the DBT Scheme

    Cost Savings – DBT system helped India achieve by eliminating ghost beneficiaries, duplication, and leakages. (BlueKraft Digital Foundation, 2025)

    Better targeting – Subsidy allocations reduced from 16% (pre-DBT) to 9% of total government expenditure.

    Transparency and Reduction in Leakages – DBT has significantly reduced ghost beneficiaries and duplication. Eg-In PAHAL (LPG subsidy)

    Financial Inclusion – PM Jan Dhan Yojana enabled over 50 crore accounts, empowering poor women and rural households to receive funds directly.

    Efficiency and Timeliness – Eliminated intermediaries and delays. Eg-MNREGA, PM-KISAN, and PMUY payments.

    Strengthening Governance Accountability – Real-time monitoring via Public Financial Management System (PFMS) ensures audit trails and transparency.

    Inclusive Welfare Delivery and targeted support during crises. Eg-20 crore women Jan Dhan accounts.

    Promotes Digital and Cashless Economy – Eg- UPI handles 85% of India’s digital payments, processing (June 2025).

    Limitations of DBT Implementation

    Exclusion Errors: Aadhaar authentication failures lead to denial of benefits. Eg- Jharkhand PDS (2017) saw 10-15% exclusion (NITI Aayog).

    Digital Divide: Only 43% rural households have internet access (NFHS-5, 2021).

    Weak Banking Infrastructure: Shortage of bank branches and CSPs in rural and hilly areas.

    Data Privacy and Security Risks: Eg- Aadhaar and CoWIN data leaks.

    Technocratic Bias: Focus on automation sidelines those lacking digital literacy or documentation

    Administrative Delays: Verification and coordination issues cause payment rejections or delays. Eg- payment delays in MGNREGA

    Limited Grievance Redressal: Weak feedback mechanisms for correction of DBT errors.

    Way Forward

    Improve Authentication: Use offline Aadhaar, multi-factor verification, and local validation.

    Institutional Reforms: Apply Business Process Re-engineering (2nd ARC) for simpler workflows.

    Social Audits and Human Interface: Combine digital governance with local institutions for last-mile trust.

    Strengthen Digital Infrastructure: Accelerate BharatNet Phase-II to connect all Gram Panchayats

    Enhance Digital Literacy: Expand PMGDISHA and integrate digital literacy in school curricula (e-Kidz, IT clubs).

    India must move toward “Technology with Inclusion” – ensuring no beneficiary is left behind.

  • The most significant achievement of modern law in India in the constitutionalization of environmental problems by the Supreme Court. Discuss this statement with the help of relevant case laws.

    “The Constitution is not a mere lawyers’ document, it is a vehicle of Life, and its spirit is always the spirit of Age.”- B.R. Ambedkar

    Constitutionalization of environmental problems under Article 21 is the embodiment of this spirit.

    Constitutionalization is done through

    Expansion of Article 21

    Use of Directive Principles (Art. 48A, 51A(g))

    Development of Doctrines (Polluter Pays, Precautionary Principle, Public Trust, Absolute Liability, Intergenerational Equity)

    Expansion of Judicial Review & PILs

    Use of Continuous Mandamus

    Relevant case laws

    Industrial Pollution

    MC Mehta v. Union of India (Oleum Gas Leak, 1986) – Established Absolute Liability for hazardous industries.

    Indian Council for Enviro-Legal Action v. UOI (1996) – Applied Polluter Pays Principle.

    Water Pollution

    MC Mehta v. UOI (Ganga Pollution, 1988) – Ordered closure of polluting tanneries.

    Paryavaran Suraksha Samiti v. UOI (2017) – Directed installation of Sewage Treatment Plants (STPs).

    Air Pollution

    MC Mehta v. UOI (Delhi Pollution, 1998) – Mandated conversion of public transport to CNG.

    MC Mehta v. UOI (Firecrackers, 2024) – Imposed ban to ensure clean air.

    Deforestation & Forest Rights

    T.N. Godavarman v. UOI (1997-ongoing) – Continuous mandamus for forest conservation.

    Niyamgiri Case (2013) – Empowered Gram Sabha to protect tribal rights.

    Climate Change

    M.K. Ranjitsinh v. UOI (2024) – Recognised Right against adverse climate impacts under Articles 14 and 21.

    Natural Resources

    MC Mehta v. Kamal Nath (1997) – Applied Public Trust Doctrine to rivers.

    Reliance Natural Resources v. RIL (2010) – Declared natural resources as public property.

    Development Projects

    Narmada Bachao Andolan v. UOI (2000) – Integrated sustainable development into constitutional law.

    Vanashakti v. UOI (2024) – Stressed need for prior environmental clearance.

    As Justice P.N. Bhagwati observed, “Right to life includes the right to live with human dignity” – and dignity today is inseparable from a clean and healthy environment.

  • Right of movement and residence throughout the territory of India are freely available to the Indian citizens, but these rights are not absolute. Comment

    “Liberty means freedom to do everything which injures no one else.” (French Declaration of the Rights of Man, 1789). The Right to Movement and Residence under the Indian Constitution embodies this idea of liberty.

    Constitutional Provision

    Article 19(1)(d) – Right to move freely throughout the territory of India.

    Article 19(1)(e) – Right to reside and settle in any part of India.

    However, it is not absolute as

    Reasonable Restrictions under Article 19(5) – interests of the general public or for the protection of Scheduled Tribes.

    Protection of Scheduled Tribes – Restrictions in 5th and 6th Schedules safeguard traditional culture, property rights, and protect tribes from exploitation by outsiders.

    Security of State – Eg – Restrictions under AFSPA in disturbed regions.

    Public Order – Curfews, preventive detention, or restrictions during riots.

    Judicial Endorsement – Eg – State of UP v. Kaushailiya (1964) upheld restrictions on movement of prostitutes to protect public health and morality.

    Pandemic Situations – During COVID-19 lockdowns, freedom of movement was restricted to control spread of the virus.

    Inner Line Permit (ILP) – Required in certain north-eastern states; prior approval of state government needed to protect local interests.

    Foreigners – Can be deported for violating rules, even though citizens enjoy freedom of residence.

    “Liberty is not a license, but is regulated freedom.” Ensuring individual liberty while safeguarding collective interests reflects balanced constitutionalism.

  • ‘Sea is an important Component of the Cosmos’. Discuss in the light of the above statement the role of the IMO(International Maritime Organisation) in protecting environment and enhancing maritime safety and security.

    The oceans cover nearly 71% of the Earth’s surface and are the foundation of planetary life. The IMO, a UN specialized agency established in 1959, plays a critical role in promoting safe, secure, and environmentally sustainable use of the seas.

    Sea as an Important Component of the Cosmos

    It regulates climate, supports biodiversity, and drives global trade (over 80% of international trade by volume)

    Oceans absorb about 30% of global CO₂ emissions, produce half of the world’s oxygen, and absorb 90% of excess heat generated.

    Biodiversity and Life: Marine ecosystems host nearly 80% of all life forms

    Moral Value as part of the “common heritage of mankind”

    Engine of the Blue Economy: fisheries, renewable ocean energy, tourism, and seabed resources

    Role of IMO in Environmental Protection

    Net-Zero Framework – a global mechanism to price carbon emissions from ships and use the proceeds to help developing countries transition to green shipping.

    Pollution Prevention through MARPOL convention:

    Regulates oil, chemical, sewage, garbage, and air pollution.

    Enforce low-sulphur fuel standards and Energy Efficiency Design for new ships

    IMO’s Initial GHG Strategy targets 50% reduction in ship emissions by 2050 (from 2008 levels).

    Promotes green shipping and alternative fuels (LNG, methanol, hydrogen), and carbon intensity.

    Prevents transfer of invasive aquatic species through Ballast Water Management Convention

    IMO’s Polar Code addresses safety and environmental protection in polar waters

    Role in Maritime Safety and Security

    IMO provides a legal and technical framework for cleaner and safer shipping.

    SOLAS (Safety of Life at Sea, 1974) is IMO’s flagship convention, setting global ship design and emergency standards.

    STCW Convention (1978): Mandates uniform global training and certification for seafarers.

    ISPS Code (2002): Strengthens ship-port security against terrorism and piracy.

    IMO assists regional frameworks like Djibouti Code of Conduct (Somalia Basin) and ReCAAP (Asia) to combat piracy.

    Introduced e-navigation and Global Maritime Distress and Safety System (GMDSS) to improve real-time communication.

    Challenges

    Weak Enforcement: IMO relies on flag states’ compliance.

    Developing countries face technological and financial limitations for meeting emission targets.

    Emerging Threats: Cybersecurity and illegal fishing.

    Slow Decision-Making due to consensus-based model.

    Climate-Trade Dilemma: Balancing decarbonization with global trade competitiveness remains difficult.

    Recently, negotiations on the net zero framework have been adjourned for a year after opposition from the US and Saudi Arabia.

    Way Forward

    Stronger Monitoring Mechanisms through real-time tracking.

    Capacity Building of developing nations under a “Common but Differentiated Responsibility” framework.

    Strengthening R&D : green shipping corridors, hydrogen fuel, and maritime innovation hubs

    Global Cooperation among IMO, UNEP, UNDP, and regional maritime bodies like IORA

    As seas sustain both life and livelihood, global cooperation under IMO’s leadership is essential to achieve a safe, secure, and sustainable ocean future.

  • The crucial aspect of development process has been the inadequate attention paid to Human Resource Development in India. Suggest measures that can address this adequacy.

    Human Resource Development refers to the strategic investment in education, health, and skills to empower individuals, foster productivity, and ensure sustainable national growth.

    Inadequate Attention to HRD in India

    Stagnant Public Spending: Education spending is ~2.9% of GDP (2024-25), far below the 6% target set by NEP 2020. (Economic Survey 2025-26)

    Learning Poverty Paradox: ASER 2024 reports that only ~43% of Class V students can read a Class II-level text.

    Acute Skill Mismatch: Only 56.35% of Indian graduates were found employable by industry standards in 2026. (India Skills Report 2026)

    Chronic Nutrition Crisis: 35.5% of children under five are stunted, affecting long-term human capital. (NFHS-5)

    Gender Participation Gap: Female Labour Force Participation Rate (FLFPR) stands at 32.7% compared to over 75% for males. (PLFS 2024-25)

    The Persistence of Digital Divide: Unequal access to tech-enabled learning alienates rural and economically vulnerable students.

    Vocational Stigma: Less than 5% of the workforce has formal vocational training. (NSDC 2024)

    Healthcare Infrastructure Gaps: Public health spending remains around 2.1% of GDP. (NHP recommended 2.5%)

    Mental Health Neglect: Rising student anxiety and workplace burnout are modern HRD barriers.

    Brain Drain: Failure to provide high-end research infrastructure leads to the flight of top-tier talent.

    Measures to Address HRD Inadequacy

    Capability Approach – increase spending on Health (2.5%of GDP) and Education (6% of GDP)

    Foundational Literacy Focus: Prioritize the NIPUN Bharat Mission to ensure every child achieves grade-level competency

    Vocational-Academic Integration: Mandate vocational training in secondary schools to bridge the gap between schooling and work. (NEP, 2020)

    Strengthening Primary Health: Expand the Ayushman Bharat Health and Wellness Centres to ensure preventative care is a “right.”

    Bridging the Digital Gap: Use BharatNet Phase-III to provide high-speed fiber connectivity to every rural school.

    Empowering Women Workers: Provide safe transport, childcare, and flexible work to boost female participation. Eg: Karnataka’s Shakti Yojan and free higher education for girls.

    Institutionalizing Mental Wellness: Make Socio-Emotional Learning (SEL) a core part of the school and office curriculum.

    R&D and Innovation Hubs: Establish the National Research Foundation (NRF) to fund deep-tech innovation and retain high-end talent.

    By integrating health, education, and skills into a holistic HRD framework, India can achieve inclusive growth and the vision of a developed nation by 2047.

  • “Development and welfare schemes for the vulnerable, by its nature, are discriminatory in approach.” Do you agree? Give reasons for your answer.

    As Dr. B.R. Ambedkar said, “Political democracy cannot last unless there lies at the base of it social democracy.” Development and welfare schemes are pivotal for uplifting vulnerable sections of society.

    Welfare Schemes – “Discriminatory”

    Targeted Beneficiaries – Eg- Stand-Up India provides loans only to SC/ST and women entrepreneurs.

    Resource Allocation Bias – Eg- Special Component Plan (SCP) and Tribal Sub-Plan (TSP) earmark fixed budgetary percentages.

    Political and Regional Disparities – Eg- 90% central funding to North East and Special Category states under CSS

    Dependency and Moral Hazard – Overemphasis on welfare transfers can foster dependency rather than empowerment.

    Bias and Perceived Discrimination – Non-reserved categories view these schemes as diluting meritocracy and unfair. Eg- Reservation Policies

    Welfare Schemes – Corrective, Not Discriminatory

    Constitutional Mandate for Positive Discrimination – Articles 15(4) and 46 empower the state to make special provisions for the advancement of socially and educationally backward classes.

    Bridge Structural Inequalities and corrects historical injustices. Eg- 106th Amendment Act

    Inclusive Human Development – Programs like Ayushman Bharat, PM Poshan, and PM Matru Vandana Yojana address basic capabilities of health, nutrition, and education.

    Aligns with the UN SDGs (Goal 1: No Poverty, Goal 10: Reduced Inequality) which encourage special focus on vulnerable populations.

    Resource Optimization- Limited resources necessitate prioritizing those most in need, ensuring efficient use of funds.

    Impact Maximization- Eg- Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana (PMAY) for affordable housing.

    Social Cohesion- Inclusive growth fosters social stability and reduces tensions arising from socio-economic disparities.

    Impact

    India lifted 248 million people out of multidimensional poverty between 2013-14 and 2022-23 (NITI Aayog, MPI Report 2024).

    MGNREGA: Women’s participation stands at over 57%, reflecting strong gender inclusion.

    PM Ujjwala Yojana – Over 10.5 crore LPG connections provided since 2016

    PM Jan Dhan Yojana: 55 crore accounts opened, with 56% held by women

    Way Forward

    Capability Approach: increase expenditure on Health (2.5% of GDP) and Education (6% of GDP)

    Bottom-up Planning – Porto Alegre Brazil Model

    Welfare schemes for the vulnerable may appear discriminatory in form, but they are affirmative in purpose to realise the vision of “Sabka Saath, Sabka Vikas, Sabka Vishwas”

    Women Empowerment

  • Skill development programs have succeed in increasing human resources supply to various sectors. In the context of the statement analyze the linkages between education, skill and employment.

    Education, skill, and employment form the triad of human capital formation, driving productivity and inclusive growth.

    Education-Skill-Employment Linkages

    Education as Foundation: provides cognitive abilities, literacy, and numeracy, forming the base for advanced skill acquisition. Eg- NEP 2020 integrates vocational exposure from Class 6

    Formal education develops critical thinking, problem-solving abilities, and soft skills like communication and teamwork, essential for the workplace.

    Skill as Bridge: transforms theoretical knowledge into practical competence needed by industries. Schemes like PMKVY and DDU-GKY create job-ready youth.

    Employment as Outcome: Skilled and educated individuals meet the sectoral demands in manufacturing, services, and digital sectors, ensuring sustainable livelihoods.

    Circular Relationship:

    Employment reinforces education and upskilling through continuous learning.

    Promotes innovation, productivity, and entrepreneurship, especially in MSME and start-up ecosystems.

    Challenges

    Mismatch between academic curricula and industry needs.

    Regional disparity in training infrastructure.

    Lack of soft skills and digital literacy.

    Lack of continuous updating of curriculum to match evolving industry needs.

    Challenges in ensuring high-quality training and certification aligned with industry standards.

    Fragmented implementation (In-silos approach) of schemes like PMKVY, PM-NAPS, and JSS

    Low Formal Skill Penetration – Only 4.7% of India’s workforce has received formal vocational training (NSDC, 2025), compared to 52% in the U.S. and 80% in South Korea.

    Limited Apprenticeship Penetration – Only ~0.1% of the workforce is engaged in formal apprenticeships, due to low awareness and regulatory burdens for employers.

    Way Forward

    Evidence-Based Interventions – Enhance skill mapping to align training programs with evolving job market needs.

    Adopt Result-Based Financing (RBF) and Skill Impact Bonds to link funds with placement, wage gain, and retention outcomes.

    Strengthen industry-academia collaboration through apprenticeship models. Adopt Germany’s dual vocational system.

    Align education with the National Skills Qualification Framework (NSQF).

    Promote lifelong learning and digital reskilling.

    Strengthening this linkage is essential for realizing India’s demographic dividend and building an Atmanirbhar Bharat.