💥Join UPSC 2027,2028 Mentorship (August Batch) + XFactor Notes & Microthemes PDF
Talk to Mentor

Civilsdaily

Login

GS Paper: GS2

  • UDAN Scheme Revamp: Subsidy Extended to 5 Years 

    Why in News

    The Union Cabinet approved a revamped UDAN scheme with ₹28,840 crore outlay, extending airline subsidies and shifting funding to government budget support.

    About UDAN Scheme

    • Full form: Ude Desh ka Aam Naagrik
    • Launched: 2017
    • Ministry: Civil Aviation
    • Objective:
      • Improve regional connectivity
      • Make air travel affordable
      • Develop Tier 2 and Tier 3 airports

    Key Changes in Revamped UDAN

    1. Subsidy Extended

    • Earlier subsidy period: 3 years
    • New subsidy period: 5 years
    • Purpose:
      • Improve route viability
      • Prevent route discontinuation

    2. Funding Shift

    • Earlier: Subsidy funded through levy on airfares
    • Now: Subsidy funded directly from government exchequer

    Why Revamp Was Needed

    • Many routes became non viable after subsidy ended
    • CAG findings: Only 7% to 10% routes viable after subsidy
    • Status of routes:
      • Total routes launched: 663
      • Routes discontinued: 327
    • Airports revived: Total: 95
      • Discontinued: 15 airports
    [2024] Consider the following airports: 
    1 Donyi Polo Airport 
    2 Kushinagar International Airport 
    3 Vijayawada International Airport 
    In the recent past, which of the above have been constructed as Greenfield projects? (a) 1 and 2 only (b) 2 and 3 only (c) 1 and 3 only (d) 1, 2 and 3

  • [25th March 2026] The Hindu OpED: Deepening global corruption as a pointer for India

    PYQ Relevance[UPSC 2016] In the integrity index of Transparency International, India stands very low. Discuss briefly the legal, political, economic, social and cultural factors that have caused the decline of public morality in India.Linkage: The question tests integrity and public morality in governance, a core GS-2 theme linked to institutional trust. The article shows declining integrity through India’s low CPI score (39), reflecting weakened ethical standards and governance deficits.

    Mentor’s Comment

    The latest Corruption Perceptions Index (CPI) 2025 reveals that global corruption is worsening rather than improving, with the global average dropping to 42/100 and 122 out of 182 countries scoring below 50, marking a sharp deterioration. For the first time in over a decade, corruption trends show systemic decline rather than gradual improvement. The scale is significant: corruption costs are estimated at 5% of global GDP (~$2.6 trillion annually), making it not just a moral concern but a major economic constraint.

    What is the Corruption Perceptions Index (2025)?

    1. The Corruption Perceptions Index (CPI) 2025 is published by Transparency International in February 2026
    2. It ranks 182 countries by their perceived public-sector corruption levels using a scale of 0 (highly corrupt) to 100 (very clean). 
    3. The 2025 report shows a stalling global average score of 42/100, indicating widespread corruption, with Denmark (89) ranking highest and Somalia/South Sudan (9) lowest 
    4. Methodology: The index relies on 13 independent data sources, including surveys and expert assessments, to measure bribery, nepotism, and misappropriation of public funds.

    Why is global corruption worsening despite institutional advancements?

    1. Declining Global Average: Indicates systemic deterioration in governance; CPI average falls to 42, lowest in over a decade
    2. Widespread Underperformance: 122/182 countries score below 50, showing weak institutional integrity globally
    3. Reduced Democratic Oversight: Weakening of civic freedoms and oversight mechanisms enables corruption expansion
    4. Shift from Improvement to Decline: Earlier gradual improvement trends replaced by consistent backsliding
    5. Governance-Investment Link: Lower transparency directly impacts investment decisions and sovereign risk assessments

    Why does India’s performance indicate structural governance stagnation?

    1. Stagnant CPI Score: India scores 39 (rank 91); fluctuates narrowly between 38–41 over a decade
    2. Growth-Governance Gap: Economic expansion not matched by institutional strengthening
    3. Comparative Weakness: China scores 42, Sri Lanka comparable; Bangladesh and Pakistan lower but India trails many peers
    4. Missed Reform Momentum: Countries with similar starting points improved through regulatory and institutional reforms
    5. Persistent Institutional Gaps: Weakness in public procurement, judicial efficiency, and regulatory enforcement

    How does corruption impose measurable economic costs?

    1. Global GDP Loss: Estimated at 5% of global GDP (~$2.6 trillion annually)
    2. Transaction Costs: Increases uncertainty and compliance costs for businesses
    3. Resource Misallocation: Diverts capital towards rent-seeking instead of productive investment
    4. India-Specific Impact:
      1. Direct Loss: ~0.5% of GDP annually
      2. Total Impact: 1-1.5% of GDP including indirect effects
    5. Development Trade-off: Losses equal funds required for health, education, and infrastructure investment

    How does regulatory complexity fuel corruption in India?

    1. Compliance Overload: Presence of 26,134+ imprisonment-linked provisions in business laws
    2. Entry Barriers: Example: Pharma unit requires compliance with 998 obligations before operations
    3. Criminalisation of Business: Nearly 49% provisions carry potential criminal liability
    4. Discretionary Power: Complex frameworks increase bureaucratic discretion and rent-seeking opportunities
    5. Cost of Doing Business: Regulatory burden raises operational costs and discourages entrepreneurship

    What role does digital governance play in reducing corruption?

    1. Direct Benefit Transfer (DBT): Reduces leakages in welfare delivery through bank-linked transfers
    2. Digital Payments Growth: RBI Digital Payments Index rises from 493.22 (March 2025) to 516.76 (Sept 2025)
    3. GST System: Enhances formalisation and tax traceability
    4. E-Procurement Platforms: Reduce human discretion in public contracts
    5. Institutional Technology Use: Demonstrates governance improvement through digitisation

    Why is corruption now a strategic economic vulnerability?

    1. Fiscal Inefficiency: Reduces effectiveness of public expenditure
    2. Regulatory Credibility: Weakens investor confidence and sovereign ratings
    3. Social Trust Erosion: Undermines public confidence in institutions
    4. Growth Constraints: Limits India’s aspiration to become a $10 trillion economy
    5. Institutional Imbalance: Rapid economic growth without governance reforms creates systemic risk

    Why should CPI be seen as a benchmark rather than a verdict?

    1. Perception-Based Measure: Reflects public sector integrity perception, not absolute corruption levels
    2. Institutional Strength Indicators: Captures judiciary independence, regulatory transparency, enforcement capacity
    3. Reform Sensitivity: Countries improving rankings show cumulative institutional reform, not episodic crackdowns
    4. India’s Strength Base: Strong democracy, digital capacity, and constitutional framework
    5. Policy Direction Tool: Helps identify governance gaps and reform priorities 

    Conclusion

    Corruption has transitioned from a governance issue to a structural economic constraint. India’s stagnant CPI performance underscores the need for systemic institutional reforms, regulatory simplification, and judicial efficiency improvements. Sustainable economic growth requires parallel strengthening of governance frameworks, ensuring transparency, accountability, and predictability.

  • When the Chief Justice steps away

    Why in the News?

    The recusal of Justice Surya Kant from the Chief Election Commissioner appointment case is significant because it raises conflict of interest concerns at the highest judicial level, especially in a Constitution Bench matter. The case exposes a systemic gap, India has no codified law on judicial recusal, despite repeated controversies, making this a critical moment for institutional reform.

    What is judicial recusal?

    1. To recuse in court means for a judge, magistrate, or juror to voluntarily remove themselves from a case due to a conflict of interest, bias, or the appearance of impropriety. 
    2. This action ensures impartiality and maintains the integrity of the judicial process, preventing a judge from deciding a case where they have a personal stake. 

    Why is judicial recusal central to natural justice?

    1. Natural Justice Principle: Ensures nemo judex in causa sua (no one should be a judge in their own cause), preserving fairness and legitimacy.
    2. Bias Prevention: Prevents both actual bias and reasonable apprehension of bias, as seen in evolving jurisprudence.
    3. Public Confidence: Strengthens trust in judicial outcomes by ensuring neutrality.
    4. Case Reference: Manak Lal v. Dr. Prem Chand (1957) shifted focus from actual bias to likelihood of bias. In Ranjit Thakur v. Union of India (1987) the court refined it further stating that, a reasonable apprehension of bias and not merely a remote possibility, justifies withdrawal.

    How has judicial recusal evolved in India?

    1. From Automatic Disqualification to Reasonable Apprehension: Earlier strict disqualification (pecuniary interest) expanded to perceived bias standards.
    2. National Judicial Appointments Commission (NJAC) Case Context: In Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Association v. Union of India (2015), recusal debates arose due to judges’ institutional stakes in judicial appointments.
    3. Justice Chelameswar’s View: Emphasized necessity doctrine, when no alternative forum exists, judges must hear the case despite conflicts.
      1. Doctrine of Necessity:  The Doctrine of Necessity is a legal principle ensuring that, if the only available authority faces a disqualifying conflict, the duty to act takes precedence over recusal. When all members of a body are involved or no alternative forum exists, they must decide the case to avoid a legal impasse
    4. Shift in Approach: Increasing reliance on judicial conscience rather than objective standards.

    What triggered the recent controversy?

    1. Chief Election Commissioner Appointment Law Challenge: Concerns over executive dominance replacing earlier judicial inclusion
    2. Conflict of Interest Concern: Justice Surya Kant cited possible perception of bias due to institutional linkage.
    3. Bench Direction Issue: Oral direction reportedly excluded judges likely to become CJI, raising questions of pre-emptive disqualification.
    4. Repetition of Recusal: Same judge had recused earlier in a related matter, reinforcing concerns about systemic ambiguity.

    What are the risks of discretionary recusal?

    1. Lack of Transparency: No obligation to disclose reasons consistently; creates opacity.
    2. Bench Composition Manipulation: Strategic recusals may influence outcomes indirectly.
    3. Institutional Instability: Frequent recusals in Constitution Bench cases disrupt continuity.
    4. Unequal Standards: Different judges follow different thresholds, leading to inconsistency.

    Does the doctrine of necessity justify non-recusal?

    1. Doctrine of Necessity: Allows judges to hear cases despite conflict if no alternative forum exists.
    2. Application in India: Used in NJAC case where the entire judiciary had a stake.
    3. Limitation: Overuse may dilute impartiality standards.
    4. Balancing Act: Necessity must be exceptional, not routine.

    Why is codification of recusal urgently needed?

    1. Absence of Statute: India lacks binding rules governing judicial conduct in recusal.
    2. Comparative Insight (US): Statutory framework (28 U.S. Code §455) mandates disqualification based on objective criteria.
    3. Self-Enforcement Problem: The Indian system relies on judges themselves to decide, without a review mechanism.
    4. Rising Frequency of Controversies: Repeated recusals in high-stakes cases highlight urgency.

    What institutional reforms can address the issue?

    1. Codified Guidelines: Defines objective thresholds for recusal (financial, personal, institutional bias).
    2. Reason Disclosure Norm: Ensures recorded justification for recusal decisions.
    3. Review Mechanism: Allows limited institutional oversight without undermining judicial independence.
    4. Roster Transparency: Strengthens trust in bench allocation process. 

    Conclusion

    Judicial recusal in India currently operates within a grey zone of personal discretion, creating risks of inconsistency and institutional mistrust. A calibrated framework, balancing independence with accountability, is essential to ensure transparency, predictability, and credibility in constitutional adjudication.

    PYQ Relevance

    [UPSC 2023] “Constitutionally guaranteed judicial independence is a prerequisite of democracy.” Comment.

    Linkage: The PYQ examines judicial independence as essential for democracy, including impartiality and institutional integrity. Judicial recusal ensures impartiality, but lack of codified rules creates gaps in transparency, affecting real judicial independence.

  • Ancient City of Tyre in Lebanon Threatened by Ongoing Strikes

    Why in News

    Ancient archaeological sites in Tyre, southern Lebanon, are under threat due to Israeli airstrikes amid the ongoing Israel–Hezbollah conflict.

    About Tyre

    • Located in southern Lebanon, around 20 km from Israeli border
    • One of the oldest cities on Mediterranean coast
    • Recognised as UNESCO World Heritage Site
    • Civilisations present in Tyre: Phoenician, Persian, Hellenistic, Roman and Byzantine

    UNESCO Protection Efforts

    • Blue and white emblems placed near sites
    • Initiative launched across 30 cultural locations
    • Based on 1954 Hague Convention

    1954 Hague Convention

    • Protects cultural heritage during armed conflicts
    • Prohibits attacks on heritage sites
    • Applies to all warring parties
    [2024] Consider the following statements: 1 It is the Governor of the State who recognizes and declares any community of that State as a Scheduled Tribe. 2 A community declared as a Scheduled Tribe in a State need not be so in another State. Which of the statements given above is/are correct? (a) 1 only (b) 2 only (c) Both 1 and 2 (d) Neither 1 nor 2

  • Supreme Court: Only Hindus, Buddhists and Sikhs Eligible for Scheduled Caste Status

    Why in the News

    The Supreme Court ruled that only persons professing Hinduism, Buddhism, or Sikhism can claim Scheduled Caste status, and conversion to any other religion results in immediate loss of SC benefits.

    Key Supreme Court Ruling

    • Conversion to Christianity or Islam leads to:
      • Immediate loss of Scheduled Caste status
      • Loss of reservation benefits
      • Loss of legal protections under SC laws
    • The ruling invoked Clause 3 of the Constitution Scheduled Castes Order 1950

    Constitutional Basis

    Constitution Scheduled Castes Order 1950

    Clause 3 states:

    • Only persons professing:
      • Hinduism
      • Sikhism added in 1956
      • Buddhism added in 1990
    • are eligible for Scheduled Caste status.

    Meaning of “Profess” Explained by Court

    The Court clarified:

    • “Profess” means:
      • Publicly declaring religion
      • Practicing religion openly
    • Private belief alone is not sufficient
    • Public religious practice determines eligibility
    [2024] Consider the following statements: 1 It is the Governor of the State who recognizes and declares any community of that State as a Scheduled Tribe. 2 A community declared as a Scheduled Tribe in a State need not be so in another State. Which of the statements given above is/are correct? (a) 1 only (b) 2 only (c) Both 1 and 2 (d) Neither 1 nor 2

  • [24th March 2026] The Hindu OpED: A decade of building India’s TB Championship movement

    PYQ Relevance[UPSC 2020] COVID-19 pandemic has caused unprecedented devastation worldwide. However, technological advancements are being availed readily to win over the crisis. Give an account of how technology was sought to aid management to the pandemic.Linkage: This PYQ tests application of technology in public health crises, focusing on diagnostics, digital tools, and governance outcomes in disease management. The same COVID-driven technological shift (AI, rapid diagnostics, decentralisation) is now being institutionalised in TB control to address early detection gaps and improve accessibility.

    Mentor’s Comment

    India’s fight against tuberculosis (TB) is entering a decisive phase. On the occasion of World TB Day (March 24), the focus has shifted from treatment expansion to a more critical bottleneck, early and accurate diagnosis.

    What is TB Diagnosis?

    Tuberculosis (TB) diagnosis involves identifying TB bacteria through sputum tests (smear microscopy, culture, or rapid molecular tests like GeneXpert), chest X-rays, and TB infection tests (skin test or IGRA blood test). Active TB, which causes symptoms like cough and fever, requires sputum analysis, while latent TB is detected by immune response tests

    Why is TB diagnosis emerging as the central challenge in India’s TB elimination strategy?

    1. High Burden Reality: India contributes the largest share of global TB cases, making early detection a critical bottleneck.
    2. Diagnostic Delay: Delays in diagnosis increase transmission, worsen outcomes, and raise mortality.
    3. Asymptomatic Prevalence: National TB Survey shows ~50% of TB cases are asymptomatic, making symptom-based screening insufficient.
    4. Low Sensitivity Tools: Traditional sputum smear microscopy fails to detect drug resistance and has low sensitivity.

    How has the TB diagnostic landscape evolved in the last decade?

    1. Technological Transition: Shift from sputum smear microscopy,  molecular diagnostics (CBNAAT, TrueNat).
    2. Indigenous Innovation: TrueNat (2020) enabled decentralized molecular testing at primary care level.
    3. AI Integration: AI-enabled portable chest X-rays allow rapid screening and interpretation.
    4. Programmatic Expansion: NTEP deployed hundreds of portable X-ray machines under community screening drives.
    5. Non-Sputum Methods: Use of tongue swabs and alternative samples improves accessibility for vulnerable populations.

    What structural gaps continue to limit the effectiveness of TB diagnostics?

    1. Access Inequality: Limited availability of molecular testing in rural and hard-to-reach areas.
    2. Human Resource Constraints: Dependence on trained radiologists and technicians restricts scaling.
    3. Turnaround Delays: Delayed reporting reduces treatment initiation efficiency.
    4. Pediatric TB Challenge: Children often lack sputum; diagnosis remains difficult due to low bacillary load.
    5. Extra-Pulmonary TB (EPTB): Accounts for ~25% of TB burden; diagnosis remains complex and expensive.

    Why is a comprehensive diagnostic toolbox necessary for TB elimination?

    1. Diverse Disease Manifestation: TB presents in multiple forms (pulmonary, extra-pulmonary, asymptomatic).
    2. Population Diversity: Requires tools adaptable for children, elderly, and immunocompromised individuals.
    3. Drug Resistance Detection: Molecular tools enable early identification of resistant strains.
    4. Precision Targeting: AI and biomarkers help identify high-risk individuals for preventive therapy (TPT).

    What role do innovation and research play in strengthening TB diagnostics?

    1. Evidence-Based Procurement: Technologies evaluated by ICMR before scale-up.
    2. Cost-Effectiveness Focus: Need for affordable and scalable diagnostic tools.
    3. Biomarker Development: Enables prediction of disease progression and targeted interventions.
    4. AI-Based Solutions: Portable ultrasound and AI-driven screening tools under development.
    5. Real-World Validation: Need for field-based studies to assess performance in low-resource settings.

    How do community-led initiatives like TB Champions strengthen the TB response?

    1. Peer Advocacy: TB survivors act as communicators, reducing stigma and improving awareness.
    2. Behavioural Change: Community engagement improves treatment adherence and early reporting.
    3. The National Tuberculosis Elimination Programme (NTEP) Integration: Survivor-led model formally adopted under National TB Elimination Programme.
    4. Social Inclusion: Targets vulnerable groups, urban poor, tribal populations, socially marginalized.
    5. Anti-Stigma Impact: Increased confidence among patients; improved care-seeking behaviour. 

    Conclusion

    India’s TB elimination strategy is increasingly dependent on diagnostic transformation rather than treatment expansion. While technological innovation and community participation have improved detection capacity, systemic gaps in accessibility, inclusivity, and real-world implementation persist. A comprehensive, evidence-based, and decentralized diagnostic ecosystem is essential to accelerate progress toward TB elimination.

  • On the independence of EC

    Why in the News?

    The independence of Election Commission of India as an issue has resurfaced following allegations of large-scale irregularities in electoral rolls, particularly during the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) exercise in Bihar, where nearly 65 lakh voters were reportedly deleted. The Opposition has moved a resolution seeking removal of the Chief Election Commissioner (CEC), marking a rare and politically significant development. The controversy also follows the enactment of the Chief Election Commissioner and Other Election Commissioners (Appointment, Conditions of Service and Term of Office) Act, 2023, which altered the appointment process after the Supreme Court’s intervention in Anoop Baranwal v. Union of India (2023).

    Does Article 324 Provide Adequate Constitutional Safeguards for Electoral Autonomy?

    1. Constitutional Mandate: The Election Commission of India derives authority from Article 324 of the Constitution, which vests in it the superintendence, direction, and control of elections to Parliament, State Legislatures, and the offices of President and Vice-President. Ensures centralized electoral authority insulated from executive interference.
    2. Security of Tenure: CEC removal follows procedure identical to Supreme Court judges under Article 124(4). Ensures high threshold for removal.
    3. Protection of Conditions of Service: Service conditions cannot be varied to disadvantage after appointment. Prevents executive pressure.
    4. Institutional Permanence: Establishes ECI as a constitutional body, not a statutory authority. Strengthens structural autonomy.

    How Has the 2023 Appointment Law Altered the Balance Between Executive and Institutional Independence?

    1. Legislative Intervention: The Chief Election Commissioner and Other Election Commissioners (Appointment, Conditions of Service and Term of Office) Act, 2023, replaced earlier executive practice. Regulates appointment and removal.
    2. Selection Committee Composition: Includes Prime Minister, Union Minister, and Leader of Opposition. Excludes Chief Justice of India (as mandated temporarily in Anoop Baranwal judgment).
    3. Judicial Background: Supreme Court in Anoop Baranwal v. Union of India (2023) directed inclusion of CJI until Parliament enacted a law. Strengthened interim institutional balance.
    4. Subsequent Change: Parliament removed CJI from the selection panel. Raises concerns regarding executive dominance.
    5. Institutional Impact: Alters equilibrium between executive participation and perceived neutrality.

    Do Allegations Regarding Electoral Roll Revisions Indicate Structural Weaknesses in Electoral Administration?

    1. Special Intensive Revision (SIR): Conducted to update voter rolls. Ensures accuracy and elimination of duplication.
    2. Reported Deletions: Approximately 65 lakh voters allegedly deleted in Bihar during SIR exercise. Raises questions regarding procedural safeguards.
    3. Democratic Significance: Article 326 guarantees universal adult franchise. Voter deletion directly affects representational legitimacy.
    4. Administrative Transparency: Requires verification, notice, and opportunity to respond. Ensures natural justice.
    5. Institutional Credibility: Large-scale deletion without adequate communication undermines public trust.

    What Is the Constitutional Procedure for Removal of the CEC and Other Commissioners?

    1. CEC Removal: Follows impeachment-like process under Article 324(5) read with Article 124(4). Requires special majority in Parliament.
    2. Other Commissioners: Removable on recommendation of CEC. Ensures hierarchical internal protection.
    3. Judges Inquiry Act, 1968 Framework: Provides investigative procedure in cases of misbehaviour or incapacity.
    4. Parliamentary Safeguard: High voting threshold prevents arbitrary removal.
    5. Accountability Mechanism: Balances independence with constitutional responsibility.

    Does Political Contestation Around the ECI Undermine Democratic Legitimacy?

    1. Bipartisan Respect: Constitutional bodies require cross-party legitimacy. Strengthens democratic culture.
    2. Opposition’s Motion: Indicates political dissatisfaction. Signals institutional strain.
    3. Majoritarian Context: Removal unlikely without sufficient parliamentary majority. Demonstrates structural protection.
    4. Rule of Law Principle: Ensures allegations are examined within a constitutional framework.
    5. Public Confidence: Perceived politicisation reduces electoral credibility.

    How Does the Doctrine of Basic Structure Protect the Election Commission?

    1. Basic Structure Doctrine: Free and fair elections form part of the basic structure (Indira Gandhi v. Raj Narain, 1975).
    2. Judicial Review: Courts can intervene if legislative action undermines electoral fairness.
    3. Constitutional Morality: Requires institutions to operate beyond partisan interests.
    4. Separation of Powers: Prevents concentration of electoral authority under executive control.

    Conclusion

    The constitutional architecture provides significant safeguards for the Election Commission’s independence. However, institutional credibility depends not only on legal protections but also on transparent processes, bipartisan trust, and adherence to constitutional morality. Ensuring free and fair elections remains foundational to India’s democratic order.

    PYQ Relevance

    [UPSC 2018] In the light of recent controversy regarding the use of Electronic Voting Machine (EVM), what are the challenges before the Election Commission of India to ensure the trustworthiness of elections in India?

    Linkage: It tests institutional accountability and public trust in elections, aligning with concerns over electoral roll revision and legitimacy.

  • Cabinet Committee on Security (CCS)

    Why in the News

    Recently, the Prime Minister of India chaired a Cabinet Committee on Security (CCS) meeting to review the global situation amid the West Asia conflict and assess mitigation measures across sectors.

    About the Cabinet Committee on Security

    • Highest decision making body on national security (Executive Body) 
    • Headed by Prime Minister of India
    • Deals with:
      • Defence policy
      • National security
      • Strategic affairs
      • Intelligence matters

    History

    • First formed in 1947 after Independence
    • Created due to emerging national security challenges
    • Initial members included:
      • Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru
      • Home Minister Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel
      • Defence Minister Baldev Singh
    • After 1999 Kargil War
      • CCS evolved into formal high powered structure
      • Became apex national security decision body
    [2014] Which of the following is/are the function/functions of the Cabinet Secretariat? 1 Preparation of agenda for Cabinet Meetings. 2 Secretariat assistance to Cabinet Committees. 3 Allocation of financial resources to the Ministries. Select the correct answer using the code given below: (a) 1 only (b) 2 and 3 only (c) 1 and 2 only (d) 1, 2 and 3

  • Corporate Laws Amendment Bill 2026 Sent to Joint Parliamentary Committee

    Why in News

    The Lok Sabha introduced the Corporate Laws Amendment Bill 2026 and referred it to a Joint Parliamentary Committee (JPC) for detailed examination.

    Key Objectives of the Bill

    • Promote ease of doing business
    • Improve ease of living for corporates
    • Decriminalise minor offences
    • Rationalise penalties
    • Streamline regulatory procedures

    Laws Proposed to be Amended

    • Companies Act, 2013
    • Limited Liability Partnership Act, 2008

    Major Proposed Changes

    • Shift minor procedural violations from criminal offences to monetary penalties
    • Simplify compliance requirements
    • Address gaps identified by Company Law Committee (2022)

    CSR Controversy

    • Opposition raised concerns about dilution of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) norms
    • Current rule: Companies must spend 2% of net profits on CSR
    • Government clarification:
      • Only net profit calculation criteria being amended
      • CSR requirement remains unchanged

    Joint Parliamentary Committee (JPC)

    • The Joint Parliamentary Committee (JPC) is not a constitutional body. 
    • It is an ad-hoc (temporary) body established by Parliament through a motion passed in both houses, or by the Speaker/Chairman of both houses, to examine specific bills or investigate urgent matters, not established directly by the Constitution.
    [2024] With reference to Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) rules in India, consider the following statements: 
    1 CSR rules specify that expenditures that benefit the company directly or its employees will not be considered as CSR activities. 
    2 CSR rules do not specify minimum spending on CSR activities. 
    Select the correct answer using the code given below: 
    (a) 1 only (b) 2 only (c) Both 1 and 2 (d) Neither 1 nor 2

  • Centre Considers 2011 Census-Based Delimitation to Implement Women’s Quota

    Why in the News

    The Union Government is considering a delimitation exercise based on the 2011 Census to implement the Women’s Reservation Act, 2023 before the 2029 Lok Sabha elections.

    Key Proposals

    • Lok Sabha seats likely to increase from 543 to 816
    • 273 seats proposed to be reserved for women
    • State Assembly seats may also be expanded
    • Amendment Bill may be introduced in:
      • Ongoing Budget Session, or
      • Special Session of Parliament

    Reason for the Move

    • Women’s Reservation Act, 2023 requires:
      • Census
      • Delimitation
      • Then implementation of 33% quota
    • 2021 Census delayed due to COVID-19
    • Without amendment, implementation could be delayed beyond 2030
    • Government aims to implement quota before 2029 elections

    Concerns of States

    • Southern States worried about loss of representation
    • Government proposal:
      • Maintain existing proportion of seats
      • Around 50% increase in seats across all States
      • Pro-rata distribution to avoid regional imbalance

    Constitutional Background

    • Article 82: Delimitation after first Census post-2026
    • Proposed amendment:
      • Use 2011 Census data
      • Avoid waiting for latest Census completion 
    [2024] Consider the following statements regarding ‘Nari Shakti Vandan Adhiniyam’: 1 Provisions will come into effect from the 18th Lok Sabha. 2 This will be in force for 15 years after becoming an Act. 3 There are provisions for the reservation of seats for Scheduled Castes Women within the quota reserved for the Scheduled Castes. Select the correct answer using the code given below: (a) 1, 2 and 3 (b) 1 and 2 only (c) 2 and 3 only (d) 1 and 3 only