Is it as much of a mistake to define ‘right action’ as to define ‘good consequence’? (15 Marks)

The above statement captures the essence of consequentialist and deontological approaches. Consequentialism talks of a good consequence regardless of whether the action was right or wrong. It says ends justify means. 

  • Deontological view talks of the right action regardless of the end consequence.
  • Meaning, the end is not important, it’s more important to follow the right path. As an eg. – the Utilitarian perspective is consequentialist while Kant’s categorical imperative is deontological.
  • Both theories have their flaws. The utilitarian perspective is only concerned with the greatest happiness of the greatest number.
  • If killing a person gave happiness to 100 other people, it would be just to execute that one person.
  • On the other hand, Kant’s categorical imperative would condemn lying but there are many instances where lying can save one’s life. So it cannot be universally applied. 


From the above, we cannot say that defining ‘right action’ is a mistake and ‘good consequence’ should have primacy. There cannot be a narrative that can be universally applied. Their applicability depends on a case by case scenario. 

Gandhi was of the opinion that not only are the ends important but so are the means. It is not enough to fight for freedom but to have Dharma on our side which means right action. This implies that the right action and good consequence need not be in contradiction. They cannot be seen in dichotomous terms. A harmonious synthesis of the two is always possible and always think of solutions that do justice to both. 

Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
siddhant singh parmar
8 months ago

MOJO9b04S00N25297271. Please review

8 months ago

Please Review…My payment id: MOJO9a31400N58094558

AWE 4.jpg
amit ojha
8 months ago


Balakumaran Kand
8 months ago


swetha K
8 months ago


swetha K
7 months ago
Reply to  Parth Verma

Thank you for the review. But kindly advise, how to prepare for these ethics question?

Pankhuri Damele
8 months ago

Payment ID: MOJO9a24700A60815067

pratik anand
8 months ago

Payment I’d MOJO9a31100A58098507

Divya Murugesan
8 months ago


Yogeshkumar Prajapati
8 months ago

Mojo id-MOJO9908R00A36163556

8 months ago

Please review.
Payment id- MOJO9a05700D19953140

8 months ago

ID: MOJO9a29V00D61774546
Thank you.

Dikshant Chauhan
8 months ago


Deepanshu Gulyani
8 months ago


New Doc 2019-11-10 13.38.40_1.jpg
New Doc 2019-11-10 13.38.40_2.jpg
Deepanshu Gulyani
7 months ago
Reply to  Parth Verma

sir i can understand the workload on you and i really appreciate your efforts too. But it would be very helpful if you can put some addons by your side in the reviews itself as the comments you have given wont be making any difference if i would answer the same question again. Hope you get it what i wanted to convey.
Thank you sir