What were the circumstances that led to nationalization of banks in India in 1969. Critically analyse its impacts.

50 years ago, the Indian financial sector underwent a tectonic shift, when Indira Gandhi government nationalized the 14 biggest commercial banks in 1969. The impact of this decision is considered by some to be, even more than the economic reforms of 1991.

The factors that led to the nationalization of banks
 Nationalisation was in accordance with the national policy of adopting the socialistic pattern of society.
 Political and Economic Reasons-
o There were two wars (with China in 1962 and Pakistan in 1965) that put immense pressure on public finances.
o Two successive years of drought had not only led to food shortages but also compromised national security because of the dependence on American food shipments (PL 480 program).
o Subsequently, a three-year plan holiday affected aggregate demand as public investment was reduced.
o The decade of 1960-70s was the lost decade for India as the economic growth barely outpaced population growth and average incomes stagnated.
o Industry’s share in credit disbursed by commercial banks almost doubled between 1951 and 1968, from 34% to 68% whereas agriculture received less than 2% of total credit.
 Agriculture needed a capital infusion, with the initiation of the Green Revolution in India that aimed to make the country self-sufficient in food security.
 Other reasons responsible for the nationalization of banks were-
o Social welfare
o Controlling private monopolies
o Expansion of banking to rural areas
o Reducing regional imbalance to curb the urban-rural divide
o Priority Sector Lending: In India, the agriculture sector and its allied activities were the largest contributors to the national income.
o Mobilization of savings: Nationalisation aimed at mobilizing the savings of the people to the
largest possible extent and to utilize them for productive purposes.

However, with the looming banking crisis in current times, debates have emerged about the privatisation of banks. This raises the question of whether nationalisation of the bank in the first place was the right move or not.
 NPA crisis since 2012 is at least partly explained by the credit bubble that grew under political patronage that emerged out of government’s control over Banks.
 There were different rates of interest for different types of loans. The Indian central bank eventually ended up managing hundreds of interest rates.
 Nationalization of banks has led to lesser competition between the public sector and private sectors banks. This has created a bureaucratic attitude in the functioning, Lack of responsibility and initiative, red-tapism, inordinate delays are common features of nationalized banks.
 The experience of the nationalized banks has shown that banks are now facing the problems of heavy overdue loans and economically unviable branches.
o Extending loans to agriculture and small scale industries is risky and less remunerative. Such loans are against the sound banking rules and may weaken the economic viability of these institutions.
 Due to lack of performance audit of banks, policy-making failed to ensure that the finance from the public institutions are, in fact, going to productive uses in the large public interest.

Given the significance of a vibrant banking system in the growth story of the nation, privatisation of banks is proposed. However, privatisation of banks is not a panacea. India must not make haste in going for the privatisation of banks, rather it must focus on comprehensive governance reforms, resolution of NPAs and creating a free market so that investment can be reinvigorated and wheels of the economy can again get back on track.

14 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
SUMONA DEY
SUMONA DEY
3 years ago

MOJO9727T00D60304985

New Doc 2019-07-29 09.19.35_3.jpg
New Doc 2019-07-29 09.19.35_2.jpg
New Doc 2019-07-29 09.19.35_1.jpg
Parth Verma
Editor
3 years ago
Reply to  SUMONA DEY

Quite a lengthy intro. Avoid it.
Simply mention what is nationalization and then mention that in 1969 the Indian government nationalized 14 major private banks and these nationalized banks are the majority of lenders in the Indian economy.
Good 1st half. Division of it under two separate headings is unique approach.
Points there are well crafted and discussed.
The 2nd part is also as good as the 1st part and its has all the necessary elements in it.
Good ending with decent way forward.

Marks
6
Borne
Borne
3 years ago

Please Review

mycams (4)_3.jpg
mycams (4)_4.jpg
Parth Verma
Editor
3 years ago
Reply to  Borne

In the intro, briefly mention what is nationalization.
The discussion is ok.
You failed to mention the negative effects of nationalization which are evident now.

Marks
3
project _osiris
project _osiris
3 years ago

2

New Doc 2019-07-27 10.57.56_1.jpg
New Doc 2019-07-27 10.57.56_2.jpg
Parth Verma
Editor
3 years ago

You have covered almost all the major areas of discussion.
In the second part, its that you discussed the issue in two heads of +ves and -ves.
But work on your presentation.
Improve your hand writing.
And do not cut so many words. It creates bad impression of indecisive nature.

Marks
5
sourav singh
sourav singh
3 years ago

Q3

IMG_20190728_161123~2.jpg
IMG_20190728_161130~2.jpg
sourav singh
sourav singh
3 years ago
Reply to  sourav singh

Not checked

Parth Verma
Editor
3 years ago
Reply to  sourav singh

Decent discussion.
You have covered the topic in depth.
Presentation can be improved.
Points are exhaustive and well explained.
Good conclusion.
Do not overuse flow chart.

Marks
5
Murari Jha
Murari Jha
3 years ago

q4
MOJO9708E00A65259027

Parth Verma
Editor
3 years ago
Reply to  Murari Jha

In the intro, briefly mention what nationalization means.
The discussion in the 1st part needs more points, specially in the direction of rural settings.
The 2nd part is nicely dealt with and it is comprehensive.
Work on your grammar. Differentiate between has and had and have.
Good conclusion.

Marks
4
SUMONA DEY
SUMONA DEY
3 years ago

Pls review. MOJO9727T00D60304985

pranab prakash
pranab prakash
3 years ago

Payment ID MOJO9611300N14575632

Parth Verma
Editor
3 years ago
Reply to  pranab prakash

You have covered both positive as well negative affects of the nationalization.
The first part though needed more content.
You have good idea of topics and decent language but you tend not to discuss the issue in detail which hampers your overall score. Try to give more points in your answers. You have 3 pages to cover the answer. Use it to your advantage.

Marks
4