Introduction

Biosecurity refers to institutional and regulatory measures designed to prevent the intentional misuse of biological agents, toxins, or technologies. Unlike biosafety, which focuses on preventing accidental release of pathogens, biosecurity addresses deliberate threats to human, animal, and agricultural health. The expansion of biotechnology has increased human control over biological systems, simultaneously raising the risk of malicious exploitation and necessitating upgraded governance mechanisms.

Understanding Biosecurity in the Indian Context

1. Conceptual Scope: Ensures prevention, detection, and response to intentional misuse of biological agents across laboratories, agriculture, and public health systems.
2. Differentiation from Biosafety: Addresses deliberate misuse rather than accidental pathogen release.
3. Sectoral Coverage: Extends protection beyond human health to livestock, crops, and supply chains.

Evolution of Global Biosecurity Norms

1. Biological Weapons Convention (1975): Prohibits development, use, and stockpiling of biological weapons and mandates destruction of existing arsenals.
2. Normative Significance: Establishes the first global legal framework banning an entire category of weapons of mass destruction.
3. Implementation Gap: Lacks a verification mechanism, increasing reliance on national biosecurity systems.

Drivers of Biosecurity Risks in India

1. Geographical Exposure: Facilitates cross-border transmission of pathogens due to porous borders and ecological diversity.
2. Agrarian Dependence: Increases vulnerability of food systems to agro-terrorism and livestock disease outbreaks.
3. Population Density: Amplifies impact of biological incidents on public health infrastructure.
4. Non-State Actor Threats: Highlights risks from terror groups, illustrated by reported Ricin toxin preparation cases.

Role of Emerging Biotechnologies

1. Dual-Use Nature: Enables legitimate research while lowering entry barriers for malicious experimentation.
2. Technological Diffusion: Expands access to genetic manipulation tools beyond state laboratories.
3. Risk Amplification: Increases probability of low-cost, high-impact biological incidents.

India’s Existing Biosecurity Architecture

1. Department of Biotechnology: Oversees research governance and laboratory safety frameworks.
2. National Centre for Disease Control: Manages disease surveillance and outbreak response systems.
3. Department of Animal Husbandry and Dairying: Monitors livestock biosecurity and transboundary diseases.
4. Plant Quarantine Organisation of India: Regulates agricultural imports and exports to prevent pest and pathogen entry.
5. Legal Frameworks:
   1. Environment (Protection) Act, 1986: Regulates hazardous microorganisms and GMOs.
   2. WMD and Delivery Systems Act, 2005: Criminalises unlawful biological weapons activities.

Institutional and Legal Gaps Highlighted

1. Fragmented Governance: Dispersed responsibilities across multiple ministries without unified coordination.
2. Surveillance Asymmetry: Strong outbreak response but weaker preventive intelligence mechanisms.
3. Non-State Actor Focus: Limited emphasis on bio-terrorism preparedness compared to conventional security threats.

Conclusion

India’s internal security landscape is being reshaped by the convergence of emerging technologies, porous borders, and the growing role of non-state actors. While the country has built sectoral capacities in health, agriculture, and research governance, the absence of an integrated biosecurity framework leaves critical gaps in prevention and early detection. Strengthening biosecurity is therefore not only a public health or scientific necessity but a core internal security imperative, requiring coordinated regulation, intelligence integration, and sustained institutional preparedness.

Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024

Attend Now